schizo post

What challenges would Ukraine have with this kind of maneuver?

Also, how do you manage to lose the entire northeastern front? specifically and not just "lol Russia moronic"?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Pretty sure all that red already retreated behind the river.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yes, they all swam with all their equipment across a 1km wide river, very orderly, stealthily and without losing a single piece of gear. russia is truly a badass army

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        it's common for completely fricked enemies to drop their gear and leave their vehicles behind. some even try to wear civilian clothing. there's been multiple instances of this happening already in the past week. wouldn't surprise me if the russians broke up their ammo crates and made make-shift paddleboards.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the flat open plains there are difficult to overcome as an attacker

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    bad terrain, well entrenched enemy, not to mention the fact that Russia moved their best (lol, lmao even) troops to this sector

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      To be fair the trench diggers in kherson has better experience in trench digging than in kharkiv

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Southern Ukraine is all fields, and as you get close to the sea, lots of lagoons/swamps. Not mention roads are shoddy, especially through the fields, as those are usually only used by tractors. A rainstorm will turn it all to mud

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Has anyone ever tried laying down high voltage cables in said lagoons and swamps while the enemy tries to cross it? Just asking for a friend..

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Saddam did that in the Iran-Iraq war, which I presume your referencing. I see no real reason it wouldn't work here.
        Given that's the only time I've ever heard of it being used, there's probably some specific reason it worked there, while being impractical almost anywhere else.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Water isn’t actually a great conductor and shoes are really good at stopping electricity (even cheap shoes).
          You’d need at least ankle deep water and a shit ton of amperage and it would cover a huge area from where the electricity was being piped in.
          There’s better use for the power honestly.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          That's an unsupported myth and it doesnt even make sense. Do you have any idea how much current you need to even make 1square km of brackish water lethal?

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The mongols lead the russians on a wild goose chase, and let them over extend themselves. finally the mongols stopped running at a river, and fricked up the advancing russians. Maybe the Russians are trying to over extend the Ukies.

    Or maybe they're just getting their shit pushed in.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >comparing Mongols during their golden age to 2022 Russians

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >comparing Mongols during their golden age to 2022 Russians

      but its the Russians who are packed tight against the river

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Russia sent significant number of its best troops that are motivated and can fight as they expected attack on Kherson. Some people say Ukrainian strategy there is to apply pressure on Russian troops so that they need more ammo than they can transfer through rivers. Direct Ukrainian attack is what Russia actually wants because then Ukraine would take big losses

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Artillery, a lot of artillery on the orher side of the river.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      this will be probably the biggest pain in the ass since RU moved back to have frontline insight.

      Unless There would be some sort of hardcore combined arms with HARM/HIMARS and planes/choppers going behind enemy frontine to hunt them.

      But that would provide some valuable losses

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Russia has withdrawn behind the river.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >lol Russia moronic
    but that's literally the answer

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    To the second part:
    Base your defence off lies, when your enemy has nearly a million fighter formally, and informally more because of the wingnuts continuously probing your shit both out of fury and a desire for legitimacy in the eyes of the Armed forces. Combine that with terrible comms and appalling leadership.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >a million fighter formally
      >fighter
      ESLness aside, even if they have a million enlisted, only a fraction of those will be on frontline combat duty. Maybe a third or fewer.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >specifically and not just "lol Russia moronic"?
    I'm really not sure that is even possible at this point. Shitting on the Russians has become so habitual that I wouldn't be surprised if most people had no clue what was going on.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I've been reading some news articles on how the war is going and it's bewildering, to the point of being ridiculous.

    >Ukrainian forces have penetrated Russian lines to a depth of up to 70 kilometres (43 miles) in some places and captured over 3,000 square kilometres (1,100 sq. miles) of territory in the past five days since September 6. This is more territory than Russian forces have captured in all their operations since April.
    >Ukraine seized more land in five days than Russia took in 5 months

    I actually can't believe it. Either Russia is insanely incompetent or Ukraine is full of Ubermen.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      really i do look forward to all the post-war books that try to explain what happened in ukraine
      there really are a lot of intangibles a midwit neverserved like myself would know nothing about and i do look forward to some officers explaining it

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's going to be classified and kept hidden for a long time when all of this is over. The worst days of the Russians are nowhere near the worst days for the Ukrainians.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >The worst days of the Russians are nowhere near the worst days for the Ukrainians.

          What is that supposed to mean?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Honestly it's not that complicated. US military intelligence 24/7 satellite coverage of Russian forces makes it pretty easy to see where Russian lines are weakest, plus while the Ukrainians were building up the yanks were no doubt listening in to Russian communications to make sure it wasn't detected.

        It's also why I'm ignoring all claims that this is some kind of feint meme trap, the US knows where every single Russian unit is at all times and is sharing it to Ukrainian forces. It is physically *impossible* for any Russian forces to "sneak" anywhere. They are fricked.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Thats more or less a plan but its very densely fortified, small area and russians brought a lot of artillery so you cannot just bypass the fortifications without getting pounded to death.

    So for now dill combatants are splitting russian units and cutting their supplies, village after village

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i love how the Ukies just fricking absorb the epithets the Russians come up with. pigs? have some dancing Ukrainian pigs with ATGMs while we play a song about getting sucked off. dill? guess we're pickles now

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Google translate fails are just too funny to not use:

        Dill cotton near Raisins, mushroom hunt in the Sherwood forest.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    question: if russians are loosing then why is macron begging russians to stop the operation?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nobody needs total russian collapse and civil war

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He's begging them to not kill themselves and leave the rest of the world stuck cleaning up the mess of Russia fricking dying.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He's French, and so it's in his primal instinct to go directly to concessions.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm not saying Ruskies are in control here or that they are doing well, but seems to me the Russians sounded a general retreat to behind the river to regroup and resupply before the rainy season hits and then winter. Perhaps they will strike during the rainy season or winter when it's harder for the Ukrainians to maneuver or maybe they will strike for a truce and seek to keep the land they have. Whatever the case it seems to me to be difficult for the Ukes to push further but who the hell knows with this war

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >We'll attack during the rainy season after they dig back in

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >they dig in
        >their trenches melt in the Raspubreastsa

        Raspubreastsa happens in spring AND fall

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >trenches are made of sugar and dissolve in the rain
        Yeah, crazy how trench warfare just straight-up stopped and everyone stood around in open fields whenever it rained during WW1.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They are staying in Kherson, ruskies just pulled back few kilometrrs to get within umbrella of artillery on the other side of the Dneper

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/4cWI0z0.png

      What challenges would Ukraine have with this kind of maneuver?

      Also, how do you manage to lose the entire northeastern front? specifically and not just "lol Russia moronic"?

      >Russians sounded a general retreat to behind the river
      The general retreat was on Kharkiv.
      There's literally nowhere for the Russians to go. They are trapped in Kherson because Ukraine blew all the bridges and keeps blowing up the pontoons they try to put in place.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The Ukrainians have left pedestrian crossings intact. The Russkies CAN leave. Just without any of their heavy gear.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    None, russians are already running

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Their best troops are in Kherson, which partly explains why they're fricked in the East, and why they will struggle in Kherson. Not sure what they can do besides negotiate safe passage and then flatten the place from a safe distance. I suppose if they clear out Donetsk and Luhansk they could possibly convince these guys to surrender.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine is content slowly grinding away at Kherson which keeps the 20K+ Russian army group pinned there with the river to their back. They could rush it but for what purpose?

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Well, the primary challenge would be you'd be fighting through fricking Eastern European hedgerows. You want to push via the highways.

    Can nobody read maps anymore?

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >go where the russians are strongest
    Stupid plan. Mine is much better

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      God, I wish
      What defences do they even have there, really?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Russia probably won't collapse as a result of this invasion. Search throughout history and you won't find many examples of a country collapsing because they were repelled from a nation they invaded.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Russia collapsed twice due to that

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Source?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Bolshevik revolution was caused by fail in RussoJapanese and WW1 war.
            Fall of SU happened partially due to failure in Afghanistan.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          russian disaster in ww1 -> fall of tsarist russia
          russian disaster in afghanistan -> fall of soviet union

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            At the very least, Putin's gonna go. Russia's economy is shot, their army's smashed, and Russian survivors of the war are going to come home with VERY bad stories.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Afganistan collapse of USSR
            Ur double digit iq should waddle back to plebbit. It collapsed due to massive sunk costs to contain Chernobyl disaster

            God damn your stupid, cum stain of a human

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              genuine moron here.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Correct. The reality is that Russians are used to forced to eat shit and moving on with their lives. Defeat will be a deep psychological blow but they know there's nothing they can do about it that will make anything better.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ruskies retreated and left lots of tanks and ammunistion behind, im guessing they arent payed and fricked off back home.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No point in taking the city for now. Just keep blowing up the bridges and keep the 35k troops stuck there.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *