100% doubt. I used to believe this BS just like I used to believe the Ancap/Nosteponsnek homosexualry as a teen. Fact of the matter is, only if moral and intelligent people were armed and everyone else disarmed, would the world be a better place. So though I wouldn't take away some shitbags right to own a gun, I wouldn't be like an oblivious NRA boomer trying to get Jamal, Jose, and Cletus to own a lot of AR15s.
I was thinking of buying one next year if Bolsonaro wins again. But I already have other firearms (Taurus/CBC and Imbel), so you should follow his advice
>living on minimum wage >buying a Glock as first gun
Black person, get a G2C and save for your rifle. Glocks are good, but if you are patient you can get glocks for half that price if you import
Tauruses have that dystopian corporate brown mutt mystery meat soulless, cheap but somehow work good enough for government work feel. From the way they look, to the way they shoot. It's really quite charming and feel extremely utilitarian, something you can buy multiples off and use and abuse like a tool without worry. Unfortunately this is the route all firearm makers are going as they've noticed that quality firearms isn't where the $$$ is, cheap and mass produced barely working firearms make more money.
It’s not ideal but yes, especially with the supreme court trying to frick him up at every way possible and impossible
Before no one could get a gun, now you can get anything up to .50 bmg and not being full auto if you’re 25yo
Carrying is also legal now due a loophole he did, if you’re stopped by the police you simply have to say you’re on your way to the shooting range
He wants to make a new constitution where gun ownership is a right if he wins the reelection
Thanks fren, if we lived in a fair world i would have no doubt about him winning but when you see shit like international magazines like The Economist and American Senators like Bernie Sanders saying he already lost and will try a coup and trying to force the world to instantly acknowledge Lula as the president it makes me a bit suspicious of what may happen
>Doesn't fricking explode if you use +P ammo. >Actually supports micro-red dots. >Actually bothers to improve the design. >Actually has a switch safety. >Uses a disassembly lever instead of tabs, like a sane design. >Barrels are just as easy to swap as a Glock, and polygonal barrels exist; Sig just doesn't do them by default cause it doesn't fricking matter at the ranges you use pistols for.
>Doesn't fricking explode if you use +P ammo.
Yes it does >Actually supports micro-red dots.
So does Glock and a bunch of other brands >Actually bothers to improve the design.
Meaningless >Actually has a switch safety.
This is a downgrade >Uses a disassembly lever instead of tabs, like a sane design.
This is a downgrade >Barrels are just as easy to swap as a Glock, and polygonal barrels exist; Sig just doesn't do them by default cause it doesn't fricking matter at the ranges you use pistols for.
There are no aftermarket polygonal barrels for the Sig P320. They provide significantly higher muzzle velocity for the same barrel length. It's nearly the difference between +P and standard pressure ammo. Sig doesn't do them because they're cheap and low volume.
>Option of a safety isn't an improvement >Requiring a trigger pull to disassemble isnt a design flaw >Velocity bump of a polygonal barrel is totally meaningful
Not even that gay, don't personally like the p330 either but lmao >But muh personal responsibility
The Glock design is the equivalent of releasing a new model of car requiring you turn it on and put a brick on the accelerator to pop the hood. There's no excuse for such lazy and accident prone engineering when alternatives exist.
>Option of a safety isn't an improvement
No, having the option to integrate a design flaw is not an improvement. At best it's neutral for the people who don't select it and at worst it's a downgrade for the people that do. >It's too dangerous to unload your guns before taking them apart! What if you're so moronic you forget 1 of the 2 steps?
The same person at risk of this would be at risk of trying to swallow the takedown lever and choking to death.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>A safety feature that literally doesn't effect performance is a design flaw.
What the frick are you smoking, anon?
Glock is the only handgun that has survived and thrived without military adoption. The p320 was out for almost a decade and nobody gave a frick because its a fat ugly piecr of shit that does nothing special but now the military uses it so it gave it some street cred. Sig which discontinues everything will discontinue your gun. Glock will live on. Die mad about it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Glocks also never fricking changed a damn thing with every re-release despite clear design flaws and outdated engineering principles.
AKA: The fricking reason no military uses the damn thing.
Glock literally only thrives because of Black folk who hear about it in rap all the time.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Glock is the only handgun that has survived and thrived without military adoption. The p320 was out for almost a decade and nobody gave a frick because its a fat ugly piecr of shit that does nothing special but now the military uses it so it gave it some street cred. Sig which discontinues everything will discontinue your gun. Glock will live on. Die mad about it.
Every Special Forces in the world uses Glocks
2 years ago
Anonymous
They also use Sig, and HK, and FN-Five Sevens, and basically anything.
The ONLY advantage Glocks have is a safety that can't snag or be forgotten, which is a niche use that ONLY Special Forces have.
2 years ago
Anonymous
lol, they overwhelmingly use Glocks
saying special forces still use shit like the Mk23 or the Mk11 is mega disingenuous, it’s like saying infantry use Remington 700s instead of M4s, those use cases are suuuuper niche
When I was in the Rangers, literally the only sidearms I saw anyone use were 17s and 19s, and that was six years ago, it’s probably even more slanted towards Glock now
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Special Forces overwhelmingly uses Glocks >Trust me, I was a Ranger
Disregarded.
2 years ago
Anonymous
USSOCOM has unified procurement for nearly all of its subordinate commands' firearms and TA-50, moron.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Tell me you don't know what you are talking about without telling me you don't know what you are talking about
2 years ago
Anonymous
lol, they overwhelmingly use Glocks
saying special forces still use shit like the Mk23 or the Mk11 is mega disingenuous, it’s like saying infantry use Remington 700s instead of M4s, those use cases are suuuuper niche
When I was in the Rangers, literally the only sidearms I saw anyone use were 17s and 19s, and that was six years ago, it’s probably even more slanted towards Glock now
>be me frog ex-intel few years ago >used to work with a lot of SOF that are deep into guns and can play with anything available on worldwide market because they are spoiled children of the military >ask most of them "which handgun would you advise me to buy for civilian use ?" >answers were all the same "go for a Glock and you are set"
So maybe.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Sig, and HK, and FN-Five Sevens
yeah sure they do
>Switch safeties are infinitely better than "Muh Trigger Discipline" especially since Glock keeps being recommended to newguns.
As they should be. Glocks and other similar striker fired guns without manual safeties are the simplest and least finicky guns to learn on. If they want extraneous crap like manual safeties, it's better for them to learn they're unnecessary early on and view them as a quirk similar to magazine safeties. >Disassembly lever is also what EVERYONE ELSE does, because it's a more robust, safer, and efficient design.
The PPQ and PDP don't have one. The P10C doesn't have one either. It's neither safer, nor is it more "robust", In the case of the P320 or other guns where the lever can be removed from the frame, it can be lost or the user can forget to install it when reassembling. This requires the user to pull the trigger to separate the FCU from the slide (unless they have tools) thereby negating any "safety" benefit from the takedown lever.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Lots of people who can shoot circles around you carry with safeties. The fact your gun doesn't have a safety doesn't make you an "elite opr8tur", did you really think you were? lol
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Lots of people who can shoot circles around you carry with safeties.
You're purposefully mixing together guns that actually need a manual safety to be carried safely with a round chambered (like a 1911) with troglodytes who buy a striker fired gun like a P320 with a manual safety. Yes, of course there are people who carry 1911s who could outshoot me. Many 1911 carriers tend to be enthusiasts and very dedicated to learning the ins and outs of their gun. A person who carries a striker fired gun like a P320 with a manual safety though is almost by definition an incurious person with a lack of familiarity with firearms. I have no problem claiming I could outshoot anyone who carries in this configuration.
don't drop it! I'll take a taurus over a 320 any fricking day. Dumbasses tried to take their 250 hammer fired gun and do as little work in as short a time as possible to enter MHS trials and shit out that abomination. Don't bother replying, I don't give a fraction of a frick
Have a little peek into the 2017 army report of the xm17 program >Incapable of going through 200 rounds without stoppage >The "upgrade" trigger breaks because it's too thin
[...]
I love this one because in a few lines they admitted that Glock performed better in the trial and they just massaged the results to get what they wanted
can you post more, i wasn’t being snarky i’m genuinely curious
Sure thing, I love this one, apart from the drop safety concerns which are old news >The handgun double ejects live rounds, the more it's shot, the more it does this >More stoppages >They choke with ball ammo
Have a little peek into the 2017 army report of the xm17 program >Incapable of going through 200 rounds without stoppage >The "upgrade" trigger breaks because it's too thin
I love this one because in a few lines they admitted that Glock performed better in the trial and they just massaged the results to get what they wanted
G19 is your best all around glock. Actually easier to conceal than a full size grip, with 99% the shooting ability of it's G17 sized competitor. You can also throw in the standard 17 round mags in a 19.
Second to the 19 I'd say the 34, good enough for competition and duty use. And if you can CCW a 45, you can CCW a 34 since grip length is really the only factor when concealing and they have the exact same grip length.
>G19 is the best
That was my initial take too, but grip is really too small, I have large type hands. So 45, because its not as long as 17 when suppressed. My personnal ranking for all-around would be 45 > 17 > 19. For cool factor only, longslides like 34 or even 40 are just my game and beat the rest.
Cops get themselves killed. First and foremost for taking the job to the elites castle guards. And second of all because most cops have the shooting skills and understanding of guns as a hunting only fudd boomer.
I hate Glocks but deep down I really want one. I mean I already own a G48, but I want a real Glock. Considering buying a police trade-in G22 just to quench my thirst.
I'm just wondering if it's worth it. .40 S&W ammo isn't a problem for me since I already handload 10mm, so I just need to get some brass which there is always tons of it at my range (think the local PD shoot there). I'm just wondering if it's truly worth the $350 or not, since if I'm not mistaken they used to be a lot cheaper in the past. Granted, those prices will never come back but still.
Maybe I should just say frick it and do it. I've become really interested in .40 lately and I feel the urge to get something in it.
They were roughly $50 cheaper back in 2019/early 2020, but so was everything else.
If you want a Glock and don't mind things like holster wear, I'd get the police trade in .40 for that price.
There is no LEM trigger for the VP9 imbecile. So since you've been found out as a transient troon homosexual, can you just tell us what your purpose here is on this site? Part of the Ukraine shills?
Like an ar, you were boring when i first got you but your modularity has let you grow with me as my skills increase and due to the shared growth you are now my favorite and i spend more time with you touching you cleaning you playing with you than i do with all my other nicer more expensive shit. Cheers to growth and the ability to adapt.
Having the registered component being entirely plastic, and having such a simple design with a huge market for parts makes it an exceptional platform for DIY gunsmithing. Easiest handgun out there for 3D printing and 80% kitting.
I don't like the blocky grip, wish it had more of a beavertail, the grip angle still feels weird to me despite training with one, and the stock trigger is pretty mediocre. But it's fairly reliable (this aspect somehow manages to get overhyped and underappreciated), and I still trust my life to with with the only modifications I ever make is replacing the stock sights and getting it milled for a particular optic. I can also buy a brand new one for under $400 with the Glock Sports program.
no the only reason to get a glock 10mm now is the g40 bc it has the long slide, if I wanted any other barrel length I would get a smith and wesson, and i would not buy a compact 10mm that sounds awful
You say awful, I say comical.
10mm in a compact is getting close to noisy cricket levels.
The G29 really isn't that bad if you have some good handgun experience. I always shoot my handguns at least once without ears also to be aware of what kind of report it's putting off. Crazy thing is only 45ACP gives me instant tinnitus without ears.
I have a G29, i hate it. Its too short of a grip for how much recoil it has. Im 6ft 4 so i have a big hands and penis, i can shoot my G20 all day, but i rarely ever even shoot my G29 anymore due the short grip.
ah yes the humble gen 5 glock what a specimen of a handgun for not only is it streamlined and gets rid of the god awful finger grooves of both the gen 3 and 4 models but brings forward slide serrations and an ambidextrous slide release! ITS BAD ITS BAD WHY WON'T GLOCK UNDERSTAND THAT THE "THUMB" INDENT ON THE GRIP IS USELESS BECAUSE GUESS WHAT GLOCK YOU KNOW WHERE YOUR THUMB GOES WHEN YOU PRESENT THE GUN??? NOT THERE!!! AND BY GOD WHY THE FORWARD SLIDE SERRATIONS?? WHY SO IF MY HANDS ARE WET I CAN STILL PERFORM A PRESS CHECK?? WELL GUESS WHAT GLOCK THATS ONLY USEFUL IF MY HANDS ARE COVERED IN BLOOD AND I STILL NEED TO SEE IF A ROUNDS CHAMBERED BUT OH GOD OH FRICK IM BLEEDING OUT AND CANT EVEN GET MY GUN OUT OF ITS HOLSTER AHHHH!!! FRICKING USELESS AND THE STUPID AMBI SLIDE RELEASE GOD GET IT OUT OF HERE!! THE LEFT HANDED DONT EXIST AND IF THEY DID WHY WOULD THEY EVEN BE ALLOWED TO OWN GUNS??? PLEASE GLOCK JUST RE-RELEASE THE GEN 2 IT WAS THE BEST AT MOST ALL IT WOULD NEED IS AN ACCESSORY RAIL ON THE DUST COVER BUT THATS IT WHAT NOW GLOCK WHAT ARE YOUR ENGINEERS LOOKING TO FRICK UP FOR GEN 6 HUH???? WHEN WILL THIS END??????
Mostly moron proof, reliable, abundant mags and aftermarket, not many parts.
It "works" ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Out of all guns I used it's my favorite.
Here in Brazil, this weapon costs a year's minimum wage (14000 reais or approximately 2800 dollars). I've accepted that I'll never have one of these.
>living on minimum wage
>buying a Glock as first gun
Black person, get a G2C and save for your rifle. Glocks are good, but if you are patient you can get glocks for half that price if you import
that sucks, if everyone was armed the world would be a nicer place
100% doubt. I used to believe this BS just like I used to believe the Ancap/Nosteponsnek homosexualry as a teen. Fact of the matter is, only if moral and intelligent people were armed and everyone else disarmed, would the world be a better place. So though I wouldn't take away some shitbags right to own a gun, I wouldn't be like an oblivious NRA boomer trying to get Jamal, Jose, and Cletus to own a lot of AR15s.
I was thinking of buying one next year if Bolsonaro wins again. But I already have other firearms (Taurus/CBC and Imbel), so you should follow his advice
Tauruses have that dystopian corporate brown mutt mystery meat soulless, cheap but somehow work good enough for government work feel. From the way they look, to the way they shoot. It's really quite charming and feel extremely utilitarian, something you can buy multiples off and use and abuse like a tool without worry. Unfortunately this is the route all firearm makers are going as they've noticed that quality firearms isn't where the $$$ is, cheap and mass produced barely working firearms make more money.
hey brazil bro, did bolsonaro really make a difference for your gun laws and ease of carrying? everything you read about him in english is propaganda
It’s not ideal but yes, especially with the supreme court trying to frick him up at every way possible and impossible
Before no one could get a gun, now you can get anything up to .50 bmg and not being full auto if you’re 25yo
Carrying is also legal now due a loophole he did, if you’re stopped by the police you simply have to say you’re on your way to the shooting range
He wants to make a new constitution where gun ownership is a right if he wins the reelection
thanks for the rundown brazil friend, o hope you get such a constitution, brazil is the israeliteel of south america
Thanks fren, if we lived in a fair world i would have no doubt about him winning but when you see shit like international magazines like The Economist and American Senators like Bernie Sanders saying he already lost and will try a coup and trying to force the world to instantly acknowledge Lula as the president it makes me a bit suspicious of what may happen
It let Sig make a better copy.
>less reliable
>less accurate
>no polygonal rifling
>better
>Doesn't fricking explode if you use +P ammo.
>Actually supports micro-red dots.
>Actually bothers to improve the design.
>Actually has a switch safety.
>Uses a disassembly lever instead of tabs, like a sane design.
>Barrels are just as easy to swap as a Glock, and polygonal barrels exist; Sig just doesn't do them by default cause it doesn't fricking matter at the ranges you use pistols for.
>Doesn't fricking explode if you use +P ammo.
Yes it does
>Actually supports micro-red dots.
So does Glock and a bunch of other brands
>Actually bothers to improve the design.
Meaningless
>Actually has a switch safety.
This is a downgrade
>Uses a disassembly lever instead of tabs, like a sane design.
This is a downgrade
>Barrels are just as easy to swap as a Glock, and polygonal barrels exist; Sig just doesn't do them by default cause it doesn't fricking matter at the ranges you use pistols for.
There are no aftermarket polygonal barrels for the Sig P320. They provide significantly higher muzzle velocity for the same barrel length. It's nearly the difference between +P and standard pressure ammo. Sig doesn't do them because they're cheap and low volume.
>Option of a safety isn't an improvement
>Requiring a trigger pull to disassemble isnt a design flaw
>Velocity bump of a polygonal barrel is totally meaningful
Not even that gay, don't personally like the p330 either but lmao
>But muh personal responsibility
The Glock design is the equivalent of releasing a new model of car requiring you turn it on and put a brick on the accelerator to pop the hood. There's no excuse for such lazy and accident prone engineering when alternatives exist.
>Option of a safety isn't an improvement
No, having the option to integrate a design flaw is not an improvement. At best it's neutral for the people who don't select it and at worst it's a downgrade for the people that do.
>It's too dangerous to unload your guns before taking them apart! What if you're so moronic you forget 1 of the 2 steps?
The same person at risk of this would be at risk of trying to swallow the takedown lever and choking to death.
>A safety feature that literally doesn't effect performance is a design flaw.
What the frick are you smoking, anon?
Glock is the only handgun that has survived and thrived without military adoption. The p320 was out for almost a decade and nobody gave a frick because its a fat ugly piecr of shit that does nothing special but now the military uses it so it gave it some street cred. Sig which discontinues everything will discontinue your gun. Glock will live on. Die mad about it.
Glocks also never fricking changed a damn thing with every re-release despite clear design flaws and outdated engineering principles.
AKA: The fricking reason no military uses the damn thing.
Glock literally only thrives because of Black folk who hear about it in rap all the time.
Every Special Forces in the world uses Glocks
They also use Sig, and HK, and FN-Five Sevens, and basically anything.
The ONLY advantage Glocks have is a safety that can't snag or be forgotten, which is a niche use that ONLY Special Forces have.
lol, they overwhelmingly use Glocks
saying special forces still use shit like the Mk23 or the Mk11 is mega disingenuous, it’s like saying infantry use Remington 700s instead of M4s, those use cases are suuuuper niche
When I was in the Rangers, literally the only sidearms I saw anyone use were 17s and 19s, and that was six years ago, it’s probably even more slanted towards Glock now
>Special Forces overwhelmingly uses Glocks
>Trust me, I was a Ranger
Disregarded.
USSOCOM has unified procurement for nearly all of its subordinate commands' firearms and TA-50, moron.
Tell me you don't know what you are talking about without telling me you don't know what you are talking about
>be me frog ex-intel few years ago
>used to work with a lot of SOF that are deep into guns and can play with anything available on worldwide market because they are spoiled children of the military
>ask most of them "which handgun would you advise me to buy for civilian use ?"
>answers were all the same "go for a Glock and you are set"
So maybe.
>Sig, and HK, and FN-Five Sevens
yeah sure they do
Switch safeties are infinitely better than "Muh Trigger Discipline" especially since Glock keeps being recommended to newguns.
Disassembly lever is also what EVERYONE ELSE does, because it's a more robust, safer, and efficient design.
>Switch safeties are infinitely better than "Muh Trigger Discipline" especially since Glock keeps being recommended to newguns.
As they should be. Glocks and other similar striker fired guns without manual safeties are the simplest and least finicky guns to learn on. If they want extraneous crap like manual safeties, it's better for them to learn they're unnecessary early on and view them as a quirk similar to magazine safeties.
>Disassembly lever is also what EVERYONE ELSE does, because it's a more robust, safer, and efficient design.
The PPQ and PDP don't have one. The P10C doesn't have one either. It's neither safer, nor is it more "robust", In the case of the P320 or other guns where the lever can be removed from the frame, it can be lost or the user can forget to install it when reassembling. This requires the user to pull the trigger to separate the FCU from the slide (unless they have tools) thereby negating any "safety" benefit from the takedown lever.
Lots of people who can shoot circles around you carry with safeties. The fact your gun doesn't have a safety doesn't make you an "elite opr8tur", did you really think you were? lol
>Lots of people who can shoot circles around you carry with safeties.
You're purposefully mixing together guns that actually need a manual safety to be carried safely with a round chambered (like a 1911) with troglodytes who buy a striker fired gun like a P320 with a manual safety. Yes, of course there are people who carry 1911s who could outshoot me. Many 1911 carriers tend to be enthusiasts and very dedicated to learning the ins and outs of their gun. A person who carries a striker fired gun like a P320 with a manual safety though is almost by definition an incurious person with a lack of familiarity with firearms. I have no problem claiming I could outshoot anyone who carries in this configuration.
don't drop it! I'll take a taurus over a 320 any fricking day. Dumbasses tried to take their 250 hammer fired gun and do as little work in as short a time as possible to enter MHS trials and shit out that abomination. Don't bother replying, I don't give a fraction of a frick
>"I'll take a taurus"
And just like that your opinion is invalid, and your copium is replaced with mustard gas.
My brother has a g2c and honestly it's just not that good. Yeah it shoots but it just feels so eh and cheap
citation?
I can start dropping all the document from the DOD where the lay down what a massive frick up of a purchase they made
ok do that then
Have a little peek into the 2017 army report of the xm17 program
>Incapable of going through 200 rounds without stoppage
>The "upgrade" trigger breaks because it's too thin
can you post more, i wasn’t being snarky i’m genuinely curious
Sure thing, I love this one, apart from the drop safety concerns which are old news
>The handgun double ejects live rounds, the more it's shot, the more it does this
>More stoppages
>They choke with ball ammo
I love this one because in a few lines they admitted that Glock performed better in the trial and they just massaged the results to get what they wanted
its a gun for a diverse community
It works
It’s the second best Glock model, so almost all Glock advantages apply.
What's the best glock model?
Glock 30, not SF
The original, the one and only G17.
Model 17
Glock 45 MOS threaded barrel is your best all-around Glock.
G19 is your best all around glock. Actually easier to conceal than a full size grip, with 99% the shooting ability of it's G17 sized competitor. You can also throw in the standard 17 round mags in a 19.
Second to the 19 I'd say the 34, good enough for competition and duty use. And if you can CCW a 45, you can CCW a 34 since grip length is really the only factor when concealing and they have the exact same grip length.
>G19 is the best
That was my initial take too, but grip is really too small, I have large type hands. So 45, because its not as long as 17 when suppressed. My personnal ranking for all-around would be 45 > 17 > 19. For cool factor only, longslides like 34 or even 40 are just my game and beat the rest.
>17
>19
>34
these are all correct but for me, its the 19x. Come at me.
34 unless you want to carry it
no
the long one kind of slaps
Actually kinda aesthetic unlike regular block glocks.
>the long one kind of slaps
It gets a lot of cops killed
Surely its not their lack of training skill and preparation or piss poor understanding of the weapons they carry.
Don't call me surely
Cops get themselves killed. First and foremost for taking the job to the elites castle guards. And second of all because most cops have the shooting skills and understanding of guns as a hunting only fudd boomer.
love mine, accurate, reliable, easy to use, mags are cheap and you can mod it in minecraft with the auto mod
I like the thumb rest and simplicity. everything else sucks, but I still have 3 glock pattern gats...fricking Gaston.
I hate Glocks but deep down I really want one. I mean I already own a G48, but I want a real Glock. Considering buying a police trade-in G22 just to quench my thirst.
Those are like $350; what's stopping you?
I'm just wondering if it's worth it. .40 S&W ammo isn't a problem for me since I already handload 10mm, so I just need to get some brass which there is always tons of it at my range (think the local PD shoot there). I'm just wondering if it's truly worth the $350 or not, since if I'm not mistaken they used to be a lot cheaper in the past. Granted, those prices will never come back but still.
Maybe I should just say frick it and do it. I've become really interested in .40 lately and I feel the urge to get something in it.
They were roughly $50 cheaper back in 2019/early 2020, but so was everything else.
If you want a Glock and don't mind things like holster wear, I'd get the police trade in .40 for that price.
It's light and shoots fairly decent once you get used to it.
>Say something nice about it.
It fits my hand marginally better than a 3rd gen Smith?
VP9 with a LEM trigger is so fricking nice though
There is no LEM trigger for the VP9 imbecile. So since you've been found out as a transient troon homosexual, can you just tell us what your purpose here is on this site? Part of the Ukraine shills?
wut
CZ 75s and 92FSs are unironically better than glawks
Like an ar, you were boring when i first got you but your modularity has let you grow with me as my skills increase and due to the shared growth you are now my favorite and i spend more time with you touching you cleaning you playing with you than i do with all my other nicer more expensive shit. Cheers to growth and the ability to adapt.
How wholesome.
: )
Having the registered component being entirely plastic, and having such a simple design with a huge market for parts makes it an exceptional platform for DIY gunsmithing. Easiest handgun out there for 3D printing and 80% kitting.
I'm glad you mentioned that.
You get a sticker.
I don't like the blocky grip, wish it had more of a beavertail, the grip angle still feels weird to me despite training with one, and the stock trigger is pretty mediocre. But it's fairly reliable (this aspect somehow manages to get overhyped and underappreciated), and I still trust my life to with with the only modifications I ever make is replacing the stock sights and getting it milled for a particular optic. I can also buy a brand new one for under $400 with the Glock Sports program.
I like Glocks
I think Glocks look good
Contrarians tongue my anus
Doesn't look elegant and slick, just a fricking box with a handle.
Zero imagination on the side of designers
Bet you think M&P looks good homosexual
I hope they make a carbine
It's the best utilitarian gun out there. Only 34 parts. It's also the classic gun that is still relevant.
The grip texture is good.
I thought I was the only one who liked it.
It is not a Hi-Point and it is more reliable than a 1911.
Accurate, reliable, small enough to hide but big enough to hold. And it finally has a picatinny rail slot.
why wont glock make a lever action
its patent expired??
i got a model 45 as my first gun after trying one out at a range for a bit
It goes bang every time I pull the trigger like my 92fs
Famas?
Automatic pistol of choice for most of the planet.
It werks, also the longslide models look pretty cool to me
So much room for upgrades
Is it true that the 19 suppresses better than the 17?
Nothing nice to say.
Literally every gun copying it nowadays bar for a few does what it does but better.
t. CZ P10C enjoyer.
enjoy your chink tier heat treating
It’s the best gun for CENTIMETERS
I fricking hate the Glock trigger however. Feels like dragging through sand.
completely correct
Sold my g20 to a friend, now I want a G29.
Should I?
If you want. I had one once. It's fun for a little while. Then I moved on.
no the only reason to get a glock 10mm now is the g40 bc it has the long slide, if I wanted any other barrel length I would get a smith and wesson, and i would not buy a compact 10mm that sounds awful
You say awful, I say comical.
10mm in a compact is getting close to noisy cricket levels.
The G29 really isn't that bad if you have some good handgun experience. I always shoot my handguns at least once without ears also to be aware of what kind of report it's putting off. Crazy thing is only 45ACP gives me instant tinnitus without ears.
I have a G29, i hate it. Its too short of a grip for how much recoil it has. Im 6ft 4 so i have a big hands and penis, i can shoot my G20 all day, but i rarely ever even shoot my G29 anymore due the short grip.
I like how their irons have little wiggle room. Inexperienced shooters know where their bullet is going
They're really easy to 3d print with a kit
It butters my biscuit
cool chinese part makes it go fast
It's popular for a reason. If we weren't autistic with obsessions for Eastern European milsurp we'd have no problem with it
It’s common and it works , that’s it
It goes off without you ever having to touch the trigger, due to superior striker design
No unmodified glock has ever gone off without the trigger being pulled though. It's the safest possible handgun design.
I kinda think the Glock 17/19 looks cool.
G26 is cute. Cute!
They are adorable but I don't know anyone that can shoot these well.
It is a gun
it's not as gay as a bmw.
Glocks without the frame rail are extremely aesthetic, and I'm tired of pretending they're not.
There are gen 1 Glocks on gunbroker going for $1.7k-$2.7k.
Guess collectors want those.
I love glocks but collectors are weirdos
You could probably find a P80 gen 1 repro for under $1k.
There fine and I get the appeal but I wouldn't pay for one. I like rails.
ah yes the humble gen 5 glock what a specimen of a handgun for not only is it streamlined and gets rid of the god awful finger grooves of both the gen 3 and 4 models but brings forward slide serrations and an ambidextrous slide release! ITS BAD ITS BAD WHY WON'T GLOCK UNDERSTAND THAT THE "THUMB" INDENT ON THE GRIP IS USELESS BECAUSE GUESS WHAT GLOCK YOU KNOW WHERE YOUR THUMB GOES WHEN YOU PRESENT THE GUN??? NOT THERE!!! AND BY GOD WHY THE FORWARD SLIDE SERRATIONS?? WHY SO IF MY HANDS ARE WET I CAN STILL PERFORM A PRESS CHECK?? WELL GUESS WHAT GLOCK THATS ONLY USEFUL IF MY HANDS ARE COVERED IN BLOOD AND I STILL NEED TO SEE IF A ROUNDS CHAMBERED BUT OH GOD OH FRICK IM BLEEDING OUT AND CANT EVEN GET MY GUN OUT OF ITS HOLSTER AHHHH!!! FRICKING USELESS AND THE STUPID AMBI SLIDE RELEASE GOD GET IT OUT OF HERE!! THE LEFT HANDED DONT EXIST AND IF THEY DID WHY WOULD THEY EVEN BE ALLOWED TO OWN GUNS??? PLEASE GLOCK JUST RE-RELEASE THE GEN 2 IT WAS THE BEST AT MOST ALL IT WOULD NEED IS AN ACCESSORY RAIL ON THE DUST COVER BUT THATS IT WHAT NOW GLOCK WHAT ARE YOUR ENGINEERS LOOKING TO FRICK UP FOR GEN 6 HUH???? WHEN WILL THIS END??????
Mr. Cohen has entered the chat