S-400 unsuccessfully intercepted air targets and got hit

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Who remembers claims the s-400 would shoot down stealth planes with ease?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Turkey must be very satisfied with their purchase lmao

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Conspiracy tard here.
        Turkey bought those systems to the US could analyze and test them.
        The whole F-16 theater was just to sell it to the Russians and they gave them some design notes for the Kaan instead.

        That or goatfrickers are stupid, which honestly is the more reasonable explanation.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Turkey
          >who were setting their interest rates to zero because muh Islam during height of their inflation
          >smart enough for some crazy schemes
          Lol, no

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Interest rates aren't the only way to control inflation if you give the reserve more power than just interest rates.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              yet they yielded to bog standard macro economic reason and raised interests
              curious

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Well you could ban most imports, disable foreign currency purchases on credit cards, and make currency trading illegal. Works great, except you're basically sanctioning yourself from global markets

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Turkey bought those systems to the US could analyze and test them.
          The US doesn't need to. They literally watched every step of the design, production, test and operation of the S-400. They know its capabilities way better than the russians

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The conspiracy to kick the turks out of the program began when the israelites were allowed to join the program, and they started to complain and connive that the turks couldn't have the same advantage that they have in the eastern Mediterranean. Erdog probably got fooled into backing out of the program by some of his (crypto) advisers because the israelites were going to be able to shut them down from satellites or whatever, and the S400 was a convenient way of throwing a wrench into the works. Otherwise you would have seen them ramping up their s400 purchases and not just buy two units and keep them in a shed.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I do

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It proved itself to be useless in Syria. The Russian cope at the time was that Putin had ordered them to be turned off.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This is very nice quality. Russians should use smartphones more often 🙂

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Today is a heavy shill day so the freedom boys must be doing some fricking work

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Today is a heavy shill day so the freedom boys must be doing some fricking work
      Refineries, Beograd incursion, IL-76 going down (potentially with an A-50 crew) and the wounds from the actual A-50 are probably still fresh.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    yobany ro-ACK!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He also screams "I was hit in my legs, again!", just before the "yobany rot".

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >again
        Ahahahahahahahahaha

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Its was tungsten dildos and the guy filming got some spicy balls in the leg

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Thanks OP, this is amazing. The clearest raw footage I’ve ever seen of anything like that firing. There’s lots of promotional material and official footage but a smartphone makes it feel much more real.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I hate CMO so much.

    >S-300? 90% intercept rate
    >S-400? 90% intercept rate
    >SM-6? 90% intercept rate
    >SM-2? 90% intercept rate
    SOME OF THESE ARE NOT LIKE THE OTHERS YOU FRICKING ANIMALS

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No matter the advertising, it's still just a game for entertainment. Not a super-realistic simulator.
      Is it moddable btw? Stuff like those numbers should be easy to tweak.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >a game for entertainment
        It's not entertaining to see a S-400 battery magdump on 20 missiles and kill every single one when we have literal years of evidence showing that that's not the case IRL.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, they take all Russian/chinkshit at face value and just arbitrarily assign 'values' to them based on when the technology was developed.

      It's what makes sinking any Russian/Chinese ships basically impossible because they have a billion SAMs all with an absurd PK against anything coming towards them, hypersonic & ballistic targets included.

      I get why they do it, it isn't like you can get 'real' values for any of this shit, but the game really does just devolve into 'object with missiles fires missiles at other object' and any sort of real differences between technologies is completely lost (except for stealth I suppose).

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The paywalling/non-implementation of any comms/commander-pov stuff is fricking enraging too. They arbitrarily give ships reaction times based on like two criteria (one of which, the vessel type, is hard coded) and the moment one ship detects something another ship can immediately prepare to fire on it. Which completely nullifies any differences in engagement processes between ships.

        Like, a Moskva class in 2010 would probably have to call over a radio net to notify other ships of a target. One ship would probably not be able to transmit, immediately, good data on a contact. IFF would be a real issue. Since all the missiles are semiactive one ship having a firing solution/lock doesn't necessarily mean another ship has one too.

        A 2000s tier Arleigh Burke though would spot the target, datalink it more or less instantly to anyone in its network, and could proceed with the engagement basically without making any radio calls. Maybe some calls in the CIC but that's it. One ship could spot a target, cue another ship, that ship could acquire the target, and an SM-2 could be fired at it without any radio calls. That's the entire point of the systems architecture.

        CMO does not simulate basically any of this. I think this is why Chinese and Russian ships are so fricking annoying to fight. Every single example of a Russian ship or SAM battery conducting an actual engagement we've seen has shown them being undertrained (not a fault of the simulation sure) and reacting to random ass missiles popping up out of nowhere and just magdumping as a result. We have seen, with reasonable numbers of cruise missiles expended, Russian intercepts done so slowly that the third last missile made it through. In CMO every missile is intercepted.

        They need to do something about it really badly anon.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >entire fleet has telepathy
          Same kinda problem as most 4X games. Your society just does what you tell it to, and everything is shown to you in clear quantities.
          Or how most vehicle games don't force you to view the world through an actual periscope or porthole binos, but give 3rd person.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I hope AI in the future can make up for it. I'd pay a lot of money for say, a divisional level Graviteam Tactics where you're stuck in a bunker giving orders like Radio Commander but it's GT scale and subordinate commanders follow them out like the normal game. This would ONLY work if the AI was really, really, really, really, really good. God tier by modern standards.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            For a game that ostensibly prides itself on 'realistic implementations' it's a massive & completely compromising oversight.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Didn't CMO only get proportional navigation like last year? IDK why anyone would consider it uber realistic, it just has a broad scope in terms of what it tries to do

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >just devolve into 'object with missiles fires missiles at other object' and any sort of real differences between technologies is completely lost (except for stealth I suppose).
        Surprisingly realistic.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Not really, IRL the people responsible for targeting missiles and handling EW know autistic things about the enemy ships and can exploit them. "x ship will run at 100% theoretical performance based on statistics fed with to our random made up numbers" is fricking boring and leads to flawed results. An Aegis ship might be able to get nearly 90% intercept rates but that's because it's been developed with billions of dollars over decades.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I mean, how would you model all the human factors in vidya? At the massive scale of CMO?
            It has to come down to something simple like arbitrary percentages deciding binary outcomes. And even that is already too complex to get just right.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              That's the problem. The game needs entirely new electronic warfare, command and control, and radar models. The stealth aircraft literally have static flags set per aircraft type with effects on RCS/EW if they have "S-ducts" and shit. It's so simplistic, so hard coded, and so deterministic that you can't actually use it for anything complicated. You use it as basically an automated calculator so that you can be like "ok what happens if I have these ships vs those ships, but I introduce cruise missiles at x heading during the engagement" or whatever.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >The stealth aircraft literally have static flags set per aircraft type with effects on RCS/EW if they have "S-ducts" and shit. It's so simplistic
                Rather than simplistic, that sounds needlessly complex. I would lazyass my way with one float for RCS and use 1/(RCS**(1/4)) as a range factor for radars.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >one float
                An autist rotates an F-16 around, notices that it doesn't have an increased RCS, then throws a molotov through your window.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That's okay I can just add directional and other situational multipliers to the RCS.

                The point is you don't have to input so much needless data for every vehicle. You can simulate stealth just from a single very easily available marketing number like frontal RCS.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >You can simulate stealth just from a single very easily available marketing number like frontal RCS.
                You can't though. Are you baiting?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Adding a bunch of boolean flags like "hasSDucts" does not make it any better.
                Neither are realistic simulations but I would get similar practical results with less wasted effort.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                shouldn't ray tracing optimization be usable for something like this?

                >one float
                An autist rotates an F-16 around, notices that it doesn't have an increased RCS, then throws a molotov through your window.

                you've already got a model that will interact with a lighting engine, couldn't you use the radar system as a light source, put a fake surface offset from the aircraft towards the radar system and use reflected illumination as an indication of effective RCS?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Simulations of RCS are horrendously complicated to the point they use workstations, minimum, and are generally featured in scientific papers.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                so are very advanced computational fluid dynamics simulations, but you can still get water to splash and look good in videogames without getting cluster time. if it's off 20% from real life in a video game that's fine, as long as it uses real physics and enables emulation of real tactics. that's what people want out of simulators.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                No, like you don't understand. Anything realistic enough to be used in this context would have to be precomputed. If you did something like, say, a simulation on each radar band for a every azimuth in 10 degree steps and maybe 25-45 degree steps for elevation, reduced it to a number or two and then added on loadouts, and then added every single aircraft, you'd be looking at a truly horrendous amount of data and compute time.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Goddamn moron... almost no game has realtime fluid dynamics simulation and the ones that do, usually write papers about it because it's so exceptional. I can't think of a single game that has 3D fluid dynamics simulation.

                COOL GRAPHICS != SIMULATION
                In fact, the better the graphics the less likely it's to be a realistic physics simulation.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >COOL GRAPHICS != SIMULATION
                man, I'm so glad all graphics are totally abstract dot-matrix numerical printouts and not the best simulation of how real world lighting works that can be done.
                that'd be nuts. better go back to reading tables of pixel illumination values, since they can't be used to generate some sort of 3 dimensional lighted and textured graphical representation of objects.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                If you want something to be realistic military simulation and not just lol CoD then yes you have to actually simulate complex things like radar.

                No, like you don't understand. Anything realistic enough to be used in this context would have to be precomputed. If you did something like, say, a simulation on each radar band for a every azimuth in 10 degree steps and maybe 25-45 degree steps for elevation, reduced it to a number or two and then added on loadouts, and then added every single aircraft, you'd be looking at a truly horrendous amount of data and compute time.

                Most wargames don't even attempt to this however and work at a higher level. Everything is abstracted because the people running it don't necessarily care about the performance of a given radar system. But they do care about the operational viability of different approaches. For that purpose its good enough to make assumptions about systems if those assumptions serve goals of the simulation.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >COOL GRAPHICS != SIMULATION
                Up to the ps2 era that statement was more or less true.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That's what they do in that one KSP mod. I wouldn't call it realistic though, it's a easily understandable analogue that gets some geometric trends right, but misses a frickload of the physics

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Just precompute and ship a lookup table for frick's sake.

                No, like you don't understand. Anything realistic enough to be used in this context would have to be precomputed. If you did something like, say, a simulation on each radar band for a every azimuth in 10 degree steps and maybe 25-45 degree steps for elevation, reduced it to a number or two and then added on loadouts, and then added every single aircraft, you'd be looking at a truly horrendous amount of data and compute time.

                That's the right idea, you could treat loadouts in a simplified way as added rcs (so a single table for each of them).
                10 degrees azimuth, 30 degrees elevation, and 5 radar bands means each table is just 1500 numbers, even if you use double precision floats that's a bit less than 12 kB per table, a trivial amount.
                You could probably improve things with variable step sampling, but for CMO it would be completely overkill.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >you could treat loadouts in a simplified way as added rcs (so a single table for each of them).
                That's what VTOL VR does and it only sorta works. Different munitions have different impacts on RCS and all of this data is classified for obvious reasons.

                >even if you use double precision floats that's a bit less than 12 kB per table, a trivial amount.
                Have you considered the level of computation required to come up with these numbers? Let alone the money and time required to make models, check them for consistency, verify results, etc?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                what are you going to use to verify them? your own RCS calculations? you don't have those because all you do is b***h at people trying to do better. all they have to do is work IN GAME.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                No shit it won't be perfect, but it would be more than good enough for CMO compared to a gigaswitch with 1000 flags plus plane-specific data anyways.
                >computation required
                Even Flyout can manage decent single-direction RCS checks, it's not that hard when you don't have to deal with all the complications of real life and can tolerate a few oddities.
                Considering all the other work that goes into adding a plane, letting one mid-range PC chug at a crude 3d model for a couple minutes is nothing.
                >money and time
                Less than jury-rigging more and more special cases on top of the existing clusterfrick.
                >consistency check
                The existing model is a good starting point, again it's a matter of improving the as is not a complete shot in the dark.

                Then again, I work as an SWE for a major online fashion store and they've spent literal millions monkey-patching shit for decades, so I wouldn't be surprised if CMO just kept adding flags till the end times.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    CATBOX LINK IS KILL

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Verizon is blocking catbox. Has been for weeks.
      Clear cache no help.
      Someone suggested change DNS server. Too lazy to test tho.
      Maybe I'll try it now.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        (me)
        Tried, no helpy me.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Verizon is blocking catbox. Has been for weeks.
        First world problem.
        As a thirdie I can't relate to that.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Point of privilege!!! Point of privilege!!!!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        you can use the built in tor mode in brave to easily get around it

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Oooh when not phonegayging I will do Le That.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          catbox blocks tor

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Verizon is blocking catbox. Has been for weeks.
            Clear cache no help.
            Someone suggested change DNS server. Too lazy to test tho.
            Maybe I'll try it now.

            fatbox.moe

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >braveshill too moronic to understand the difference between DNS, proxies and tor

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >and got hit
        where?

        use a VPN/proxy

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I am fully, self-admittedly too lazy to do anything beyond clicking "Update" on Tor every month or so.

          try pomf if Catbox is fricked

          Ooh yes, this vorks.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >thump
            >thump
            >cykaaaaa
            Ya love to see it

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              ... voice cracking like a teenager XD

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Tor
            Tor should work if it works for other websites, problem might be catbox blocking Tor.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Tor
            Catbox is extremely slow so it might just not work with the shit network Tor uses.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        try pomf if Catbox is fricked

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Verizon is blocking catbox. Has been for weeks.

        try pomf if Catbox is fricked

        >try pomf if Catbox is fricked
        WEBM.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          thank you anon

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >thank you anon
            You're welcome; it obviously lacks the original audio of the Russian crew speaking throughout the video. I wasn't able to find a translated copy of the video with English subtitles.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Here, these guys got the gist of it

              >thump
              >thump
              >cykaaaaa
              Ya love to see it

              https://i.imgur.com/MhZZ3Hr.jpg

              ... voice cracking like a teenager XD

              And when the vatnigs fire missiles its all loud and grainy

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Verizon is blocking catbox.
        No. You have some other problem, but Verizon don't give no fricks about catbox. I've been using it almost daily for two years, both to upload & download. Including just now.

        catbox is fricking solid. It's going to hurt if we lose it.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    tungsten rain?

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >the last ditch spam launches right before the ordnance they were trying to intercept starts landing
    /k/ino

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >>the last ditch spam launches right before the ordnance they were trying to intercept starts landing

      Its not even last ditch attempt at defence, its getting rid of tubes filled with devils soup of chemicals and fragmentation warheads.
      Having enemy missile explode over your head is bad, but having few additional tons of fuel and explosives detonating nearby is even worse.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They only launched 3 split between two TELs, that doesn't seem like a "get rid of all the missiles" launch but rather a launch against a target

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What were they shooting at and what did he said?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      this, can anyone translate plox?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >bitch
        >bitch
        >my leg!!!!
        >bitch!!!
        >frick
        It's a beautiful language

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Along the lines of:
        >pantsir is firming
        >should we hide? Get the body armor
        BOOM
        >my legs were hit again. b***hes!
        >Indecipherable profanities

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      oпять мнe пpилeтeлa пo нoгaм, cyкa!

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    i wonder how little trouble a b-2 would have had entering russian airspace circa 1992

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      A B-52 could fly unhindered and probably undetected all the way to Moscow at any time during its existence

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        He was detected, they just had no idea what to do with it happening.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Lel if I saw this in a movie I'd say it's unrealistic

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        funnily enough several high profile aparatchniks committed suicide by jumping out of windows shortly after mr Rusts great adventure

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The chud was batshit insane
          >On 24 November 1989, while doing his obligatory community service (Zivildienst) as an orderly in a West German hospital, Rust stabbed a female co-worker who had rejected him. The victim barely survived. He was convicted of injuring her and sentenced to two and a half years in prison, but was released after 15 months.[19] Since then he has lived a fragmented life, describing himself as a "bit of an oddball".[2] After being released from court, he converted to Hinduism in 1996 to become engaged to a daughter of an Indian tea merchant.[20] In 2001, he was convicted of stealing a cashmere pullover and ordered to pay a fine of 10,000 DM, which was later reduced to 600 DM.[9][19] Another legal incident occurred during 2005, when he was convicted of fraud and had to pay a €1,500 fine.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >aparatchniks committed suicide by jumping out of windows
          Name one for me.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Geronimo.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Did he trip while getting out? How drunk are they?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He's complaining he's got his leg injured.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He slipped on all those tungsten balls on the ground.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Out of curiosity, what's the Nose Aspect RCS of a 227mm GMLRS missile? Asking for a friend.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      a conductive ogive nose cone would be about 0.02m2, the pointy tip really helps

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      tihs source is for a 107mm rocket
      https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA622300.pdf

      tl;dr -20 dbsm ish

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    There's a chapter in Harry Turtledove's Worldwar where the Germans bombard an alien landing site with the Schwerer Gustav. They aliens detect the shell and think its an SRBM. They try to shoot it down with SAMs but the big ass shell no sells it and takes out a landed cruiser. I this is something like that scene. Must be scary trying to shoot something down that's trying to kill and utterly failing to stop it.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Got hit
    May i see it?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >May i see it?

      oпять мнe пpилeтeлa пo нoгaм, cyкa!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      no because the cameraman just got raped by M30A1-sama

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I think the camera man got lucky diving under the truck. Unless its someone else giving the suka at the end and he's dead outright.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The camera guy yells "Ah, they got me in the leg again!"

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    0:15
    > ah, pantsir is also shooting
    what shorad doing?

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    working hard but hardly working

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >shitbox
    stop using this shit it doesn't work

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Russia "hits" Patriot
    >Russia is unable to provide more than a shitty thermal video and a 240p picture, even after a few days have passed
    >Ukraine hits S400
    >Russia provides a close up, first person video of the event, mere hours after it happened
    this war is a fricken clownshow

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia "hits" Patriot
      They hit an S300 that was placed on a MAN truck, nothing more

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I should've put
        >"Patriot"
        in quotation marks
        my bad

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >They hit an S300 not a patriot
        I don't want to be that guy, but how do you know it was S300? It really looked like a patriot to me.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          There's a lot of vehicles it could have been given the terrible ass quality the video was shot in.

          For example, there are other guesses that it was actually an RM-70 (basically the Czech version of a Grad) that got hit.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            So only ones that know are Ukrainians and maybe Russians.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          There's a lot of vehicles it could have been given the terrible ass quality the video was shot in.

          For example, there are other guesses that it was actually an RM-70 (basically the Czech version of a Grad) that got hit.

          You sayin zees.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      opsec is unknown technology

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    What do you think this failing was?

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Cool guys don't film explosions

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >that panic missile spam
    >still get whacked
    Just like my vidya

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    https://web.archive.org/web/20240312165422/https://files.catbox.moe/5y84zp.mp4

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The Shit-400

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Piss-400

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What's going on in this video? Watched the webm posted but still can't make sense of it

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Missiles launch.
      Young vatniks blabs and shouts Yeah Boi! (Literally) in excitement.
      All is quiet.
      Gloating tone more babbling.
      <THUMP. THUMP>
      Vatnik goes belly to the grass.
      Syka! Syka! Babbling with high pitch voice cracking.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        S-400 battery under attack by, presumably, GMLRS. Got overwhelmed by them, no clue what the number of GMLRS fired was but it's an embarrassing display by the "premier" AD system in Russian service. Cameraman took shrapnel for daring to defame glorious Russian AD with his obviously edited footage, after all no way uberSAM complex S-400 can get hit by MRLS.

        Is this recent or just a playback of something that happened a while ago because I do remember that some s400s have been blown up before

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Judging by the vegetation this is recent, and I haven't seen a strike against a S-300/400 battery with this arrangement before

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          But, but this...is old.... right, right?
          Understanding delusion: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016695/

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      S-400 battery under attack by, presumably, GMLRS. Got overwhelmed by them, no clue what the number of GMLRS fired was but it's an embarrassing display by the "premier" AD system in Russian service. Cameraman took shrapnel for daring to defame glorious Russian AD with his obviously edited footage, after all no way uberSAM complex S-400 can get hit by MRLS.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous


    You definitely need to see it on catbox or /wsg. You appreciate it much better with sound.

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I love his voice and cute little giggle at seeing the TEL launch a missile. I bet he's a cute russian twink.

    I hope he survives the war so I can mail order him.

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >buncha autists arguing about how to up-autismo an rcs sim
    >without the necessary expertise & data to ever make it accurate

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    STOP
    FILMING
    IN
    FRICKING
    PORTRAIT
    YOU STUPID ASS FRICKING TIKTOK ZOOMER

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Its easier to hold with one hand.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Also he might've been intending to capture the whole exhaust plume in frame more easily.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Easier to hold phone that way and 90% of sites people who film on their phone use are vertical. Phones should by now film two separate files so you could also get a normal screen version.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >AA gets taken out by the weapon it is supposed to counter
    Abstract kind of feel.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Fire of ~$12,000,000 in missiles against a swarm of cheap drones (they're about $1.5m each to Russia, $3.5m to their export partners based on past orders)
    >Still get fricked up.

    That might put a dampener on future sales.

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Those rocket noises tho. Also that cute giggle right before it all goes wrong.
    Hehe~ vvvvvvvrrrrrRRRRRRRR

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    at minimum ukes fired off 12 HIMARS and probably had other shit in the air as well like drones/malds/grads to decoy. still the young lads shot down 10 of 12(83%) bravo what an valiant effort lads

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They fired the whole truck at Russian AA?
      Fellow westerners, we can't accept such wasteful behaviour from the ungrateful crests. I propose we stop production and pull the remote switch on the BoJo clones. No more SAS squads and hyperdrugged mulatto soldiers either.
      It's time to focus on our own, or my daughter will have to eat hamster again this Christmas.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      How serious is tungsten wounds?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        must have not been to serious considering the laddy uploaded the video. sure he'll have a good laugh telling the story of the deadly himars at family events over potatoes and vodka

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          meh, not so sure about that

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >12 HIMARS
      ...but Stu, that's 72 GMLRS!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      A BBW ate them.

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    My guess is that thi unit was targeted because it was vulnerable; NATO noticed that it was behaving abnormally in its emissions or it was being actively jammed. S-400s are designed specifically for ABM and there’s no reason that it shouldn’t be able to detect and lock incoming ballistic missiles. The fact that it was only 1 or maybe 2 missiles is a clue; the Ukies KNEW this one was vulnerable.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The "reason" is that the S400 has always been shit, anon, despite whatever cum slurping you've done today from the Russian MoD.

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >That pained cyka at the end

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why not flood the sky with cheap ass drones to trick these things into wasting all their ammo?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They do that. They send out decoys when they send out cruise missile attacs.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *