Russian Su-25 transitions to was/were.

Russian Su-25 transitions to was/were.
https://nitter.net/eideticeye/status/1569265871448678402

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    BANK ANGLE
    BANK ANGLE

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      RETARD
      RETARD
      RETARD

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    simply regrouped into the soil

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Tactical feint, fooled you gullible westerners

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    left engine failure ?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe. DCS might have to update their flight models because I've brought a Su 25 back missing a lot more than just one engine.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        having an engine fail on takeoff while you're heavy and just barely above stall speed is different from having one fail when you're high and fast. if you stall at this altitude there is generally no recovery. the only time I've recovered a stall this low in DCS was in the P-51, did an accelerated stall on the deck and managed to level it out after 2-3 pirouettes. but that shit was only possible because I was going like 300mph to begin with.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe. DCS might have to update their flight models because I've brought a Su 25 back missing a lot more than just one engine.

      I doubt it, some right stick to level out the plane and the aircraft could at least coast on one engine. Instead, it just nose dives.

      https://i.imgur.com/lEvACRt.png

      Russian Su-25 transitions to was/were.
      https://nitter.net/eideticeye/status/1569265871448678402

      Hydraulics failure in ailerons maybe? Claps out during the bank meaning the pilot can't reorient the aircraft, aircraft yaws over as it stalls?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        something happened before the bank started, the plane jerked upwards mid-corner
        >ohshitformationtooclose
        >pull stick
        >dipped wing stalls
        >so that's how you do a hammerhe-ACK

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      most likely vortex generated by squad leader

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        My thought, bad position.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/lEvACRt.png

      Russian Su-25 transitions to was/were.
      https://nitter.net/eideticeye/status/1569265871448678402

      Pulls up quickly to gain altitude/distance from the other jet

      >loses speed

      then initiates a hard turn with the wings close to 90' to the ground

      >loses lift

      The aircraft is now going too slow and at the wrong angle to generate enough lift and it's control surfaces are unable to turn it over because it's now falling towards the ground sideways and the airflow isnt fast enough to impart force on the aircaft.

      This is what happens when you have pilots with next to no flight hours in an aircraft and when you can't afford/don't have the technology for a simulator. It's like watching someone try to fly on KSP with a keyboard for the first time.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        KSP planes are harder than any real life plane to fly. It's either 0 or 100% turns unless you have a joytick lmao

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You can press caps lock and turn on sensitive controls which make the control axis increase gradually instead of instantly...

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            not anon you replied to but what the fuck why has nobody ever told me this

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Because you went to a Russian flight school

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I have like 200 hours on that game and i didn't know this? Am i just stupid... don't answer that.

              >lol, reading is for nerds, time to do some sickass stunts
              >WE GAAN

              https://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/wiki/Key_bindings

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                OUTTA THE WAY KERBAL FUCKING SHITS

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                no way he's king, SkyKing is King.
                At least SkyKing only killed himself and didn't break the runway.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I have like 200 hours on that game and i didn't know this? Am i just stupid... don't answer that.

              absolutely based

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I have like 200 hours on that game and i didn't know this? Am i just stupid... don't answer that.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I’m a professional pilot and while I have my suHispanicions about this wreck I can’t really be too sure. Could have been an engine problem, control problem, wingtip vortices off the lead, or even spatial disorientation. All that being said I am unsure at best. But good on you for one man NTSBing your way to the truth, nice work.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Well if I put my NTSB hat on... My primary cause for the crash was pilot error-induced overbank leading to a loss of lift close to the ground. Contributing factors included spatial disorientation, pilot fatigue, pilot inexperience, and lackluster training.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Lmao that's some "it's my first time playing Microsoft's Flight Simulator"-tier shit. Russia really is just a cargo cult.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it was a storm

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >with a keyboard
      All the best pilots in arma fly with keyboard tho

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That's because ARMA lets you pull sick 15g turns into post stall maneuvers, it's not exactly a flight sim.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    imagine the ammount of vodka this retard drank before flying

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Tactical feint

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pilot took a smoke break

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    no panic

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why would they upload this

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      can't stop gopniks from sending everything on telegram

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ivan films and sends the video to his friend sergei,
      >blyat sergei look what just happened in our base
      Sergei sends it to his friends, and so on ...

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >opsec? Never heard of it

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      showing off the most skilled russian pilot

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    is he OK?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He suffered a significant emotional event.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        t. chieftain

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I think some Russian aircraft are fitted with automatic ejection systems specifically because this shit keeps happening, but I don't know if SU-25s are afforded them.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He was inverted by the time he would know to eject. Definitely deadeded

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        At that angle and altitude? The ejection will just put you in the ground faster.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I thought Russian ejection seats were famous for "0/0" performance.

          I can't imagine a pilot stress level on hearing some of these warnings.
          >terrain, terrain, terrain, pull up, pull up

          Most of the time the warnings aren't needed. It takes serious incompetence to ram into a mountain without noticing it a bit beforehand.

          Note the "most", that means "not all".

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            0/0 implies being on the ground and not upside down. If the pilot ejected the moment he started the overbank he might've been successful, but the moment he went inverted he was already dead.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ukrop planes

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      hahahahahahaa
      C
      O
      P
      E

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >do stupid fancy "let's take off at the same time really close together" formation for no reason
    >kill a pilot
    I really want Russia to stop existing so this embarrassing shitshow can finally be over.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Honestly the loss of a qualified pilot is even worse than losing the jet.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        """""qualified"""" pilot

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Qualified pilot

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You can meme about the quality of their pilot training all you want, but it doesn't change how the RUAF probably spent a good amount of money on this unfortunate pilot, and all of that money is now in the trash. On the bright side, at least some oligarch gets to embezzle the pilot's life insurance payout for a new yacht.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The plane crashed because of pilot error. The pilot banked too hard while flying too slow and forgot that wings only pull you up when flying level or in a high speed turn.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >do stupid fancy "let's take off at the same time really close together" formation for no reason
      you stupid fucking reddit invader, I know you're one. shut the fuck up. military planes take off in pairs all the fucking time. it's literally bog standard practice that has been going since before ww2. there's nothing fancy about it, it's basic airmanship

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It also adds a considerable amount of risk for metal hitting metal. There are very few practical reasons for combat aircraft to perform a wing takeoff these days. Only one I can think of is that they're taking off into weather, and the aircraft doesn't have the capability track the lead aircraft with radar or other electronic means. Otherwise for a clear day, there's no reason to take off in an interval then reassemble the formation in the air.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Time, it's done for time. You take off separately it requires two aircraft to taxi and be cleared for take off separately and then time for linking up in the air.

          In war seconds matter.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Even if taking off in an interval, the takeoff clearance is always for the formation. Also formation assembly is not time-consuming process at all, especially if there are turns along the route of flight that allow 2 to easily catch up using geometry.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You take off separately it requires two aircraft to taxi and be cleared for take off separately
            Incorrect. The formation will taxi together and be cleared for takeoff together regardless of the takeoff method. ATC always treats formations like one plane even if they're a mile apart from one another.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >It also adds a considerable amount of risk for metal hitting metal
          No, it adds a negligible amount of risk because militaries do it literally all the time. By literally I mean it, nearly every flight with more than 1 plane will take off in pairs, very few exceptions. And multiple pairs will take off one after the other.

          Stupid dilettante moron gay. You already exposed yourself, stop talking out your ass on topics you know nothing about. Back to whichever /r/shithole you crawled out of yesterday.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Watch videos of Red Flag or other large military air exercises, and most if not all fighter aircraft take off in close intervals instead of on each other's wing. Only exception would be the A-10, since they don't have radars to track their leading aircraft. Wing takeoffs are only done for training or to maintain formation integrity when taking off into weather. Also frig off I know what I'm talking about >:(

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Arma footage

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    look how fucking dirty them engines burn
    are they using coal?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      russian subhumans don't understand the concept of mainteinance

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nah, they come like that from the factory. And russian engines don't really live long enough for them to put off maintenance. Overhaul is every like 40 hours or some shit.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Shit happens. Got back and check US aircraft losses during the Vietnam era and see how many are non operational.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Russians are well known for burning coal, Anon.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Russian engines are smokey. Smokeless engine tech is weirdly difficult to develop and needs a lot of metallurgical knowledge. Hence only a few western countries have them. The Chinese have been bragging about devloping their first smokeless engines recently.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Convenient pan away.
    No proofs of crash.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, explosion after pan was just detonation of confiscated cigarettes. SU-25 made it back to base under its own power.

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    .webm

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Holly ducking sit
      Also ty webm poster

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Damn, are russians just idiots, unfit for living?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the average IQ in russia is lower than 80

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Bank angle!
      >Bank angle!
      >Terrain terrain, pull up!
      >Terr

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what a fucking camera operator

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      God damn, at least it only killed the pilot these machines are blenders.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        even marine slayer 22 has fewer crashes per sorties even if this was the only russian su-25 crash of the war

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You couldn't pay me to fly in an Osprey, it's an interesting concept but the complex maintenance required for contra rotation combine that with tilt mechanisms and add in the total mass, it's a disaster waiting to happen as we've seen time and time again.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >helicopters are insanely dangerous
            >something between a helicopter and a plane is in between the safety levels of the two
            i am fully demoralized and have completely forgotten that russia is hemorrhaging pilots and airframes at an insane rate due to the distraction before me

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Helicopters are insanely dangerous
              Wrong, helicopters can autorotate to emergency landing if their engines fail.

              Planes have redundancies and and can with the APU manage to glide into an emergency landing which is exactly what Captain Sully did when he crash landed in the Hudson River.

              .S.CoastGuard

              The problem with an Osprey, when hovering it relies on contra rotation in place of a tail rotor to control torque.
              When tilting the Blades from hover to verticle flight mode and reverse is when most accidents have occurred.
              The opposing forces creating bad air around the aircraft to cause a loss in lift and tragically a loss in life.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                moron i don't care about your pet buggaboo, and no helicopters are not suddenly super safe simply because autorotation exists
                make your osprey thread and sperg out there

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                ^ This is why the PrepHole is going/ gone to shit. The average i.q. here is in the double digits.

                You try and have a discussion on the matter of what is a stall, why it occurred, previous examples of, and use examples of other military aircraft that suffer (have a reputation for) from constant stalling and you get a post that thinks the world is based on video game physics.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >literally just post distractionbait.jpg
                >NOO I WAS HAVING A DISCUSSION ABOUT STALL
                dude... anyone can see your posts and prove that's not the case. besides which, why the fuck would you post about a weirdo bird like osprey to talk about a conventional stall?

                Looks that way, I've seen it before
                Here is a B52 doing the exact same manoeuvre and as it's larger we can study exactly what happens almost frame for frame.

                here's a post actually using a proper allegory to talk about stall

                https://i.imgur.com/vt1pi5j.jpg

                God damn, at least it only killed the pilot these machines are blenders.

                here's you being a fucking moron posting distraction bait

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >here's a post actually using a proper allegory to talk about stall

                Exactly.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so?
                >i posted that thing you used as an example of a decent post, so you can't call out my shitpost as a shitpost
                what?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You have posted nothing but low effort shitposts, you're hardly the one to be the arbiter of what other anons post.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                your mom is the arbiter of sucking my dick, now kindly shut the fuck up

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Go back to your discord and get your updated narrative. You have no interest in PrepHole or guns or military machines, you're here simply to shitpost and it shows in every post you make.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                sorry i don't make quality posts like "literally every airframe crashing is an excuse to bitch about the Osprey" like you, wow incredible

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Aaaaaaaaand.... what happens when you lose your tail rotor?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What happens when you lose your main rotor? What even is this question?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What happens to a plane when it loses its tail control surfaces? It's fucked either way if you go that far.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >When titling blades is when most accidents happen
                This isn't true though, I can't think of a single accident in wich that was the case. The vast majority of osprey accidents happen when one turbine transmission slips and forces the combining gear from the other engine to drive the rotor who's engine slipped. Actually it's when the chud greengages that causes the issues. One side loses power for a split second and then suddenly regains power. If it happens close to the ground on say landing or takeoff the pilot has a fraction of a second to register what's happening and correct. Otherwise the plane will dip it's wing into the ground or even flip over, as you can see in a couple videos of crashes

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You now remember that Chinook rotors pass in between each other during operation aka 225 near-misses a minute.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Everyone survived that crash though

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The guy in front of the camera at the very end has a nice jacket.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        stolen

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Full payload, no speed or height(enemy AA ack), still immediately banks, probably looking at flight leader rather than thinking, right into his vortexes. Zero lift, height or speed resources to use, so splat. Must be less than 100 TOTAL flight hours to be doing this.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I want to smack the cameraman in the back of his head.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wing clipped, you can clearly see it. round 10 sec mark.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      did the pilot try to eject at the very last second?

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    PULL UP PULL UP

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's a Ukrainian su25. Russian air superiority is like Haki in One-piece, not every airplane can stand near it.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      All Gray + Russian flag on tail = UA Air Force 100% Trust Me Bro

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They were on a vital mission to false-false flag Belgorod in order to mobilize russia and thusly reenact 1917. No amount of murder will convince a russian to move unless he believes his own country is doing while pretending not to.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, Ukrainian. Russia uses rocket artillery and cruise missiles instead. Just as deadly, but more efficient since you don't have to train pilots.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I can't imagine a pilot stress level on hearing some of these warnings.
      >terrain, terrain, terrain, pull up, pull up

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Soviet war machinery having any kind of safety warning to increase survival
        lol
        lmao even

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Maybe this will help with imagining:

        ?t=117

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >German pilot
          >Italian copilot
          Wholesome

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's Russian though.
        That means the speaker for the warnings is broken.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous
        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Terrifying.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There probably isn’t any form of EGPWS on a frog foot. It’s really more of a gps based transport category airplane thing that started with western airliners a few decades ago.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous
      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ?t=34
        Probably most accurate out there

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If you are flying for a non-shit airforce the autopilot will save you from such a death.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >davai, davai, blyat, blyat, WOOP WOOP

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's just regrouping comrade

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Are we getting down to kamikaze level of poliot skill?

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    NEW CHARACTER
    Russian FOOOOOORMATIONER
    >cant take off without formation

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    also, picrel (presumably su-34) is a confirmation of third russian jet downed due to friendly fire

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not so friendly, I'm affraid

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous
        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Go in like the US Marshal and his three daughters.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      and this one is a su-30 shot down over izyum. It looks like ukrainians developed revolutionary tactic (moving your AD assets along with advancing troops)

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Truly ISIS-American tactics.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Funfact: That was done by a Gepard.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          proofs?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            thats what ukrainians said

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'm sorry Gepard. I'm sorry Krautbros.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >It looks like ukrainians developed revolutionary tactic (moving your AD assets along with advancing troops)
          What a novel concept!
          [...]
          I'm sorry Krautbros

          If Germans weren't such pussies about giving them Gepards earlier, it probably would have saved hundreds of Ukranian lives.
          I think Germany and France are just beyond redemption at this point. They fucked up.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You need training to operate specialized anti aircraft weaponry.
            Just kill your self retard.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Fuck off, retard.
              Ukraine JUST recently, like the past 2 weeks, got their first Gepards.
              Germany dragged their feet on it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                moron

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >It looks like ukrainians developed revolutionary tactic (moving your AD assets along with advancing troops)
        What a novel concept!

        Funfact: That was done by a Gepard.

        I'm sorry Krautbros

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      .webm

      Interesting that the SU-25 and SU-34 crashed around the same time in friendly territory. Is this a case of bad luck or have the airframes been degraded enough that they're now more likely crash?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        given the apparent state of Russian corruption I would bet some variation of the latter. wouldn't be surprised if there are more accidents that don't get reported and that they don't have as many air frames as they claim.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Given it's Crimea, they have probably heavily overused them to stop ukr offensive. Also rus maintenance is shit

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Russian aviation is nearly as bad as their navy.
        It’s clear that their airforce is a shadow of the “official” size, with most active elements being in rough shape as well.
        Oryx is not a reliable count of air losses since they happen far from the attacker and rarely get recorded.

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    HAHA STUPID HOHOLS now you can't claim you shot it down

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    SAMIR, LISTEN TO ME, YOU MUST LISTEN TO ME SAMIR, YOU ARE BREAKING THE PLANE

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like too much bank and he may have got into his lead wingman's wake turbulence which made the bank put him in a stall.l 50ft AGL. RIP in pieces.

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaha

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    WOOP WOOP

    RETARD

    WOOP WOOP

    RETARD

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why is the Orlan drone filming it so close to the ground?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      For the tourists, this is what happens when higher-ups protect hotdogging assholes from being thrown off pilot status because "muh hard-charging Real Pilot!!"

      WHY DOES THESE FUCKING moronS ALWAYS AIM THE CAMERA AWAY AT THE CRITICAL MOMENT????

      Shock.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what was he thinking

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Fairchild_Air_Force_Base_B-52_crash

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >On 10 March 1994, Holland commanded a single-aircraft training mission to the Yakima Bombing Range, to provide an authorized photographer an opportunity to document the aircraft as it dropped training munitions. The minimum aircraft altitude permitted for that area was 500 feet (150 m) AGL; during the mission, Holland's aircraft was filmed crossing one ridgeline about 30 feet (10 m) above the ground. Fearing for their safety, the photography crew ceased filming and took cover as Holland's aircraft again passed low over the ground, this time estimated as clearing the ridgeline by only three feet (1 m).
          >Clearing the ridgeline by only three feet (1 m).

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >ooh a penny

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Wow, I look SO cool! >Nyeeaarrrrrowwwwww!
        >I bet everyone wishes they
        ELEVATION. PULL UP

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        look mom, no hands!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      For yuge planes and even C-130s can't everyone just abandon plane and jump with parachutes?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        In a low altitude manoeuvre? No chance.
        Think of the time it takes to unbuckle your safety harness, to open the rear hatch, to strap on a parachute, not to mention the time to actually get from the front to the rear of the aircraft when it's flying steady it takes a good two minutes because it won't be a straight line there will be equipment and doors in the war.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Parachutes also have a deployment time as they actually fill with air and this even takes time to slow you

          at low altitude, unless you're using the correct type of parachute, it's going to be useless. Less than useless, if you need to take a bunch of time to suit up.

          It's why pilots in a lot of situations generally prefer to try for a crash landing

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        B-52 has ejection seats, and if you squint you can see an ejection attempt made just before the plane smacks the ground. Way too late for it so the crewmember just splattered into the ground anyway.

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Remember kids, you can stall an aircraft at any speed or altitude.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >you can stall an aircraft at any speed
      no you can't, only up to maneuvering speed (Va)

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    WHY DOES THESE FUCKING moronS ALWAYS AIM THE CAMERA AWAY AT THE CRITICAL MOMENT????

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Probably too distracted with the view to focus on filming

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    turning flight stall?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Looks that way, I've seen it before
      Here is a B52 doing the exact same manoeuvre and as it's larger we can study exactly what happens almost frame for frame.

  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No wonder they canceled the airshow. Had these fuckups tried making an z formation they would likely lost a couple of planes

  33. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What the fuck are they doing? Russia is losing the war against fucking gravity, trees and roads at this point

    https://twitter.com/TpyxaNews/status/1569253480321396736

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      NATO weather control weapons are capable of creating gentle breezes up to 3 km/h in speed.
      Inflatable russian weaponry is no match.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      iirc tip angle was a major issue when MRAPs were initially coming out in the US, apparently Russia isn't very far along in this regard

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I never thought it would be as much of an issue on Russian MRAPs because they don't seem like the centre mass would be as high up as it is on western MRAPs. Perhaps at a cost to standoff distance between the hull and an IED.
        By and large they seem to have similar profiles to normal trucks

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I have heard it was said the Taliban overcame the bottom shaped V hulls of the MRAPs by detonating their IEDs on the left or right outside of the vehicle as to tip the vehicle in the opposite direction, knowing they couldn't blow it up they changed tactic into simply overturning them knowing the logistics required to right them would bog (tie up) down a convoy allowing their fighters to move in for an assault.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          which makes the taliban smarter than russians

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus, what lack of training and discipline does to a mf.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I suddenly remember my Charlemagne: "Let my armies be the rocks, and the trees, and the density of air in the sky"

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wait until their greatest ally turns on them.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It already has turned on them in February. There were reports of russian soldiers getting frostbites and cold because they didn't have winter clothing and boots.

  34. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I doubt there the primary cause of the crash was a mechanical issue, these types of accidents are almost always pilot error.
    My first guess is that 2 got out of position and tried to overcorrect back to lead's wing, then got spatial disorientation leading to that sick over-bank. Once he passed over 80-90 degrees he was already dead.
    I don't think wake turbulence played much of a factor, since it doesn't appear from the camera angle that 2 was directly behind lead's wings at any point. He appears to go really high on lead, then dip down and overbank leading to the crash.

  35. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No day without Ruzzians being a complete and utter embarrassment

  36. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  37. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    fighterbomber confirmed the pilot died

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thanks for the confirmation, but duh
      He was too low to the ground to have survived
      S

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Always with the fucking Ladas

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the flames from the crash aren't put out yet and his car is already stolen by his squadmates
      You can't make this shit up

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Is Russian way cumrad.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Be russian pilot
      >Have keyring with english word on it

      What?

  38. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ummi, flyboyz die sometime
    flyboyz don't like feet on ground like real way
    noting to see here

  39. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ZAnon sisters??????

  40. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ive heard of ground attack aircraft but this is ridiculous

  41. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Someone in a different one of these threads that showed a green Su-25 getting rekt said that Russian Su-25s are green and all gray Su-25s are Ukrainian. So which one is it? At least one of the two crashes is Ukrainian, and at least one of the posters was lying.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You do realise neither country's air force has uniform camos, right? Both Ukraine and Russia have full grey and green/brown camo Frogfoots (Frogfeet?)

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the two tone color scheme with the lighter belly is easily distinctive, retard. yes it "should" look green, that's because it's a shitty unsaturated video

        [...]
        You can clearly see the star if you pause at the right frame

        Three posts, three different answers. Which of you are lying?
        >hint: all three

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          All me

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Both Ukraine and Russia have full grey and green/brown camo Frogfoots (Frogfeet?)
        So you mean the guy in that other thread was lying when he claimed the footage of a Ukrainian Su-25 pilot ejecting into the ground was actually Russian because of the paint scheme?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the two tone color scheme with the lighter belly is easily distinctive, retard. yes it "should" look green, that's because it's a shitty unsaturated video

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Doesn't ukraine use that grey camo? Vid quality sucks ass so I can't tell what the flag is on the tail

      You can clearly see the star if you pause at the right frame

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You're clearly a lying piece of shit.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          [...]
          [...]
          Three posts, three different answers. Which of you are lying?
          >hint: all three

          I'm sorry that you can't afford glasses with your russian salary.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nice damage control, lying shill.

  42. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn't ukraine use that grey camo? Vid quality sucks ass so I can't tell what the flag is on the tail

  43. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The Russians meme magic'd "it was an accident, Ukraine doesn't blow up our shit" into an actual plane crash
    God help us if they figure out how to weaponize it.

  44. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Tower, this is Voldkachug One, my wingman is of having just gone down, please be of advising, over.
    >Roger that, Voldkachug One, proceed with mission, over.
    >... Da, tower, Voldkachug One out.

  45. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    .webm

    look how fucking dirty them engines burn
    are they using coal?

    You can see that the black smoke stops leaving the engine during the sharp bank before it crashes.

    So it looks like BOTH engines cut out, perhaps because of the wake of crossing close behind the other aircraft or just because it was too much of a maneuver to make at that low speed.

  46. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The Ukraine shills disappeared real fast after getting exposed.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      "exposed"
      bro you got fucking quiet for a few days after the breakthrough at balakliya
      Like actually quiet
      It was better that way
      Maybe you should smash your router or go lay down flat in a hole somewhere so you can continue to be quiet

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >if you don't like obvious shills lying on the internet then you're a russian

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          or a russian shill, yes.
          The people who are tired of ukraine posting just want people to shut up, they don't say stupid dramatic shit like "UKrAInE SHiLLs GoT QuEIT AFteR GEttING ExPosed!!!11!"

  47. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    stalled

Your email address will not be published.