https://militaryview.com/russian-mi-28nm-attack-helicopters-receive-new-vikhr-missiles/
Opinions about the undefeated Mi-28 Havok? one of the main reasons Nato counter offensive was stopped in Robotyne.
Russian Mi-28NM attack helicopters receive new Vikhr missiles.
Good morning sir, do not redeem the mi 28
Is this spam some kind of bot?
/k/ has been bots screaming at bots since the war in Ukraine began. Meat bots or code bots makes little difference.
Nah, it's pretty much just glavset drones trying to nest here and failing miserably, like you're doing right now.
GOOD MORNING SIRS!
They're hardly "undefeated" Ramesh. I hope they take the rupees back off you for that one. Where's the curry posting police when you need them ?
13 Mi-28 attack helicopter: (1, destroyed) (2, destroyed) (3, destroyed on the ground) (4, destroyed) (5, destroyed) (6, destroyed) (7, destroyed) (8, destroyed) (9, destroyed) (1 and 2, damaged on the ground) (3 and 4, damaged on the ground)
GOOD MORNING SIR
GOOD MORNING SERS. I
Here some pictures
Is that duct tape?
>Year of start of using 1985
9 years younger than the AH64 then.
Good morning sir, thank you for doing the needful
>Undefeated
https://nitter.net/UAWeapons/status/1509867710892711939#m
Good morning sirs
Sir please do not redeem the MANPADS
>Russian helicopters don't need their tail
>Still undefeated!
this
Unironically some pretty impressive flying.
the Ka52 can fly without a tail because it does not have a tail rotor, the Mi28 does.
>people on k don't understand /s
Anyway. Losing the tail probably means that other systems are damaged too by shrapnel/rods, so they "can".
known spammer
>all within 4 hours
jfc, this has to be a paid shill. I remember seeing this homosexual last summer too, so he's been at it for months.
BLOODY BENCHOD DO NOT REDEEM THE A2A MISSILE
Why? I was told Ukraine doesn't have an Air Force anymore.
>one of the main reasons Nato counter offensive was stopped in Robotyne.
So are you just posting to be a retard, or do you have an actual assertion to make? Because last I heard, the KA-52 was getting all the credit for doing things, and the last I saw of the Mi-28 was one getting cut in half by Starstreak sometime last year. Has the bullshit machine pivoted to the Havoc after ATACMS deleted the KA-52 fleet, or has there been footage of the Mi-28 in use that keeps getting pruned because you fucks can't make a thread that doesn't reek of curry?
yeah, wind.
>starstreak
Has zero 0 confirmed kills in Ukraine, it hasn't been heard of in over a year. They probably gave up using them
It was literally caught on video chopping OP's precious chopper in half lmao
I've seen the video, there is nothing to say that it was starstreak, it was most likely another stinger as they are the most popular platform in the conflict
ground resonance is a bitch
That isn't ground resonance, the landig gear needs to touch the ground for that. Look it up if you don't believe me.
so not many ka52 left huh?
Good morning sirs!
Tell me about your israelite hate!
>shitty beamriders from late 80's
>now attached to a discount apache that has its engines produced in Ukraine
Truly a weapon to surpass the alligator with parkinsons
>all the KA-52s have been shot down or written off so we were forced to finally integrate Vikhr on Mi-28
>clicks link
well, thanks for the trackers, but holy ESL batman, this is actually how the article opens. I don't think I've ever seen English this broken out of a "serious news source" ever before.
It wasn't the main reason. The reasons why advancing is so hard in Ukraine:
1) Very flat terrain with barely any cover
2) Everpresent drones in air spotting any significant force way before it can reach battlefield and point artillery at it.
3) Less significant but, Ukraine hasn't received enough aid.
Don't these attack helicopters usually have stupid good optics? Like you loiter and engage from very far away?
Anyways, I think you're right, heard on Mover podcast that Ukraine is fucking AA hell right now, for both sides, which is why stuff like A10c II WOULD tear shit up, they just can't operate in any decent capacity. Think same is true for Frogfoot.
No, no they do not.
Oh, well then they probably shouldn't be there. Isn't that whole place portable AA city?
The vikhrs is without doubt a long range missile but the optics arent the best.
They suffer from bad installation jobs. They are French thermals which are good but the static is horrible.
They do acheive long range hits but the optics leave much to be desired.
>Don't these attack helicopters usually have stupid good optics?
Not the case with Russian helicopters usually. Most of the footage I've seen on TG showed pretty low resolution image.
I think, AA can be mostly circumvented via precise munitions launched at standoff ranges but none of the sides have those in sufficient number to employ them on tactical level. But then you start dealing with enemy's air force and here Russia, despite all shortcomings, has enough capability to deny constant use of aviation by Ukraine beyond occasional strikes against strategic targets like air fields or Kerch Bridge, for instance.
To spend a lot of time loitering, they need to launch relatively close do they not? Haven't the Ruskies continued to move air vehicles further and further away from the front lines?
It's a waste of gas to get all the way up there and all the way back.
>retards embarrasses himself trying to shill the KA-52 for a few months
>accidentally admits to being a redditor
>intentionally admits to ban evading
>waits for the heat to cool down
>let me try shilling this different piece of shit now
your life is a failure.
Didnt that thing famously get snapped in half by a starstreak
It's so shit even the KA-52 is preferred despite having been hunted to endagered status.
Helikopter ni benchod bakala fuck you bitch
Ah geez, do the like 5 they built still exist? I remember one getting clapped early on by a starstreak. Tore the tail clean off.
>it was defeated
>NATO isn't fighting in Ukraine
>counteroffensive stopped?
More like on hold, gotta get the vatniks flesh out of the treads. All in all, you made zero true claims. Go back.
>NATO isn't fighting in Ukraine
LMAO, "We did´t lose, it´s just Ukraine" lol the cope is unreal.
please come and invade an actual NATO member, zigger. See what happens
You would do nothing polekek
then do it, rusnagger
They wouldn't have to. That said do you have any idea how much eastern Europe hates you?
Show me proof that an actual NATO unit is in Ukraine.
And before you ask, no, individuals that volunteer outside of their country are not NATO troops.
Oh. And trainers don’t count either, unless they are actually out there killing vatniks
awesome
>Piorun enters the chat
I’m still waiting for proof of active NATO troops in Ukraine Ivan.
>Columbia made it into NATO before Sweden
Cocaine is a hell of a drug