Russia loading Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant REACTOR ROOMS with heavy weapons and ammo

Tl;dr if a smooker happens it might be chernobyl 2.0
The russians aren't lettingvthe technicians scram the reactor or perform maintenance. They're also torturing employees supposedly and a bunch of Russians may also have mysteiously died recently, probably after looting radioactive materials
https://t.me/energoatom_ua/8306
https://t.me/energoatom_ua/8293

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I was under the impression they got booted out after that firefight happened a few months ago

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No that was Chernobyl

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Then you're not up to date.
      https://www.wsj.com/articles/russian-army-turns-ukraines-largest-nuclear-plant-into-a-military-base-11657035694?

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The russians aren't lettingvthe technicians scram the reactor or perform maintenance.
    Look, that makes no sense. I might be pro-Ukie, but this is retarded.
    There no reason to SCRAM the reactors. The Ukies just want to shut it down so military operations in the area are less dangerous to them. But for Russia, keeping the reactors working means they can both claim to provide power & be benevolent, as well as discouraging military engagement anywhere near it.
    In the meantime, Russia uses it to shield various units. Not doing preventative maintenance is probably due to fear of Ukie sabotage that could bring down the reactors and lower the value of this poker chip.

    Anyway, Russia currently gains nothing from a nuclear mishap.
    I refuse to believe what your claiming is anywhere near true. It makes no sense and sounds like pure makebelief propaganda.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If you're willing to believe russia more than Ukraine, go ahead, but thst telegram is from the state company responsivle for the reactor
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energoatom

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >If you're willing to believe russia more than Ukraine, go ahead, but thst telegram is from the state company responsivle for the reactor
        That doesn't prevent them from spreading propaganda.

        You, unlike the average Russian, have some idea how nuclear power works.
        The average Russian on the other hand embodies the worst redneck stereotypes, including the deep seated desire to never let any "experts" tell him what to do.
        The only way to avoid a nuclear mishap is to make sure there educated officers from Moscow or Petrograd tard-wrangling the soldiers because the officers of the Zaporozhye front are barely literate subhumans.

        I guess time will tell. I find that hard to believe.

        Nuclear reactors produce shittons of hydrogen gas. Even driving a truck in that building is huge risk not to mention packing it with even more explosives.

        >Nuclear reactors produce shittons of hydrogen gas. Even driving a truck in that building is huge risk not to mention packing it with even more explosives.
        That's not how any of this works. Most reactors are built to withstand a crashing airliner without damage to the reactor... The worst you'll do is damaging the containment building which is only necessary in case of leaks. It merely serves to contain harmful radiation products in case of a reactor breach.

        Please, do some research.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >That's not how any of this works. Most reactors are built to withstand a crashing airliner without damage to the reactor...
          Are old Soviet reactors built like that? I know they are in the USA, but USA's standards are not international.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Are old Soviet reactors built like that?
            The Russians claim all VVER-1000 pressurized light water nuclear reactors were built with missile shielding. So yeah, I'm going to assume they can take a hit.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              kinda like that claim that RBMK-1000 doesn't explode?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah, they're clearly delusional

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >The Russians claim
              Always assume the opposite of whatever a russian says to be true.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Are old Soviet reactors built like that?
            Most likely. USSR was very paranoid about such things. They could blow up thing by themselves but never give such an opportunity for someone outside.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'm not willing to assume everything 'will be just fine' in same country that chernobyl erupted in. These are old, janky, Soviet built reactors and who knows what corners were cut.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >protection against an exterior hit is the same thing as against an interior explosion (even ignoring that these reactors aren't built to western standards)
          Please go back and finish your GED at least anon.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >driving a truck is totally an interior threat to the reactor, yo.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You, unlike the average Russian, have some idea how nuclear power works.
      The average Russian on the other hand embodies the worst redneck stereotypes, including the deep seated desire to never let any "experts" tell him what to do.
      The only way to avoid a nuclear mishap is to make sure there educated officers from Moscow or Petrograd tard-wrangling the soldiers because the officers of the Zaporozhye front are barely literate subhumans.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The average Russian on the other hand embodies the worst redneck stereotypes, including the deep seated desire to never let any "experts" tell him what to do.
        Don't they always use several titles to address themselves?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        As if the average russian is calling the shots at this power plant

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You're right, the officer in the Zaporozhye front are significantly bellow the Russian average.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nuclear reactors produce shittons of hydrogen gas. Even driving a truck in that building is huge risk not to mention packing it with even more explosives.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So much of this is dumb. No, nuclear reactors don’t create sufficient concentrations of hydrogen gas to pass the LEL.
        t. Work in nuke plants and had to decon reactor cavity

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >No, nuclear reactors don’t create sufficient concentrations of hydrogen gas

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What event are you referring to? Am I supposed to know what every image of a destroyed building means?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              If you actually knew anything about NPP-s you would know. Go back

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Got it, it’s fucking nothing.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Its Fukushima retard, which suffered three (3!) Hydrogen explosions.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Its Fukushima retard, which suffered three (3!) Hydrogen explosions.
                Which suffered failures entirely unrelated to the topic at hand, and uses an entirely different design. So yeah, very relevant.

                its smart in a dickish way, since its the best way to defend against himars blowing your ammo up

                Ukies love to use hospitals, malls and schools.
                Orks love to use powerplants.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You work in a npp but dont know the iconic photo of fukushima and think it's impossible to generate enough hydrogen until you are proven wrong and move the goalpost. Got it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You work in a npp
                Not the same guy, dumbass.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Nuclear reactors produce shittons of hydrogen gas.
        lmao. that only happens when there's a loss of coolant accident and steam comes into contact with zirconium. in normal operation, there's only a tiny amount of hydrogen produced.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Look, that makes no sense. I might be pro-Ukie, but this is retarded.
      >There no reason to SCRAM the reactors
      There no reason to commit war crimes and post about it on telegram.
      There no reason to think Ukies are going to welcome you with open arms.
      There no reason to spend 100 days failing an invasion into a second world nation that shares a big border with you as the supposed second strongest military grrr russian bear stronk lmao

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Anon, Russia retardation is beyond human comprehension.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >They wouldn't do something stupid around nuclear radiation
      >Soldiers ordered by their educated officers to dig trenches in the Red Forest

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia uses it to shield various units
      Yeah, that's unironic war crime, not like killing civilians and all that boring stuff.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Like they care. It's not like they're all gonna be carried off to The Hague unless WW3 starts and Russia is completely nuked into oblivion.

        What I'm trying to say is that we should unironically nuke Russia and see what happens.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          based warmonger

          seeing putin hung for crimes against humanity would be tantalizing

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They don't have the death penalty in Europe. If you want to die due to their verdict you need to pull a Praljak.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Or just pull a Hitler, which will inevitably happen when Putin is outed as a weak chim like man

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Hanged. You hang a person. Hung is used as past-tense only for objects, not for a person. The man was hanged at dawn. The man hung the painting.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Hung is used as past-tense only for objects, not for a person.
              I see no problem.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Anon, you are forgetting the key fact that russians are functionally retarded.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Russia is BY FAR the single worst entity ever devised in regards to nuclear safety, and you seriously expect them not to nuke themselves after filling reactor rooms with a shitton of munitions and explosives? They already ordered conscripts to dig up radioactive dirt without so much as a respirator, nothing is outside the realm of stupidity with them. Christs sake they completely skipped over the idea of containment buildings until it became too politically unstable not to do so with Chernobyl. Whether on land or at sea Russians and nuclear material is a very bad combo.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Make believe propaganda... on K/ope? No way!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        YWNBAH

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >K/ope?

        It's a strange kind of insult if you think about it. You admit that you're a shill astroturfing the board, but you claim to be more truthful than the people from the board itself.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You know it will be hillarious if it blows up, and since it's a west wind zone the entire dust goes into russian direction and Russia will also be condemned by everyone as a terrorist state that will increase NATO involvement even further

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's incredible how the poorest country in Europe ended up owning the biggest nuclear power plant in it. The breakout of Soviet union was western Roman empire fall tier event. I wonder how will this look like when United States balkanize and start fighting each other.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Robert Smith of Texas oblast here, I of am wondering the same thing often

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ukraine was the USSR engineering dept.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What is even going on there? Has there been any kind of attack or occupation of the city of Zaporizhzhia itself? AFAIK it's been under Ukrainian control the whole time

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just check https://liveuamap.com/

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I get that Russia over-estimated the whole "Ukrainians would welcome them with open arms" thing, but I was in ZP back in 2015 (had an ex from there). Hoooo boy the people there loved to talk about the good old days and what a horrible thing is going on with the removal of all the communist symbols/statues etc. There is also a large hydro-electric dam in the city that I believe 100+ people died in constructing and it was also touted as one of the greatest gifts Lenin gave to the people there.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I believe 100+ people died in constructing

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Builders%27_rites
          >Grimm remarked "It was often thought necessary to entomb live animals and even men in the foundation, on which the structure was to be raised, to secure immovable stability."[2]

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >During World War II, the strategically important dam and plant was dynamited by retreating Red Army troops in 1941 after Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union.

          >The flooding surge killed 20,000 to over 100,000 unsuspecting civilians, as well as Red Army officers who were crossing over the river.

          Russian stupidity will never cease to amaze me.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dnieper_Hydroelectric_Station

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Be a shame if there was a "mysterious" radiation leak at the plant. Just localized enough to force the Russians to leave.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Be a shame if there was a "mysterious" radiation leak at the plant. Just localized enough to force the Russians to leave.
      That's no doubt what they're trying to prevent, by denying preventative maintenance from being carried out.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        that might very well be what they cause by preventing preventative maintenance from being carried out.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they probably made a base their so ukrainians wouldn't pollute their homeland with attacks

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        *there
        im retarded in the morning

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Any radiation leak significant enough to require evacuation of Russian personnel would be a disaster level event. Radiation doesn’t just leak out of a reactor. You could perhaps argue contamination but even then any such contamination would be highly localized, so it would just be “hey don’t go to this area.” Still you could sit on a pile of trash with a contamination level of 100k dpm for an hour with little total absorbed dose, main issue is breathing it in or eating it.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    reactor rooms are highly fortified
    that's why
    at no point what so ever does russia think about the hesitancy of nazi druglords to shoot at nuclear power plants because they will they are evil and really bad people

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >nazi druglords
      lol. fuck proud boys and related retards, but they can die for my freedom any day

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >m-m-muh proud boys are le national socialist
        You will NEVER be a real healthcare, bernie lost.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          hillaryously, bernie didn't run

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So are these "nazi druglords" in the room with us now?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Reactors are NOW heavly fortified how many of the VVS-1000s have a concrete container? Let alone the VVs-440s?

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >probably after looting radioactive materials
    But the precious, we wants it!

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >39 posts
    >not one "please let it happen"
    I'm disappointed in you, gays.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I live way too close to there to be happy about it, sorry.
      this kot on the other hand...

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Tl;dr if a smooker happens it might be chernobyl 2.0
    it cant be chernobyl 2.0
    chernobyl was a live reactor, that was operated out of its safety parameters. chernobyl was also an RBMK reactor while zeporizhzhia is PWR. the only way to create a nuclear explosion is to put the nuclear material in a very specific configuration, which is not possible accidentally.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      idk how to break this to you...
      but chernobyl wasn't a nuclear explosion either.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        chernobyl was a nuclear explosion

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you can't be this dumb
          chernobyl was a steam explosion.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You think you know wtf you are talking about, but you don't.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              well never mind then, you're actually this dumb.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >water is outside the fuel
                >water becoming steal causes fuel to disintegrate and disperses the radioactive material into the air
                wow that makes literally no sense

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The blast that took off the core cap (the second one) was a criticality event of about 0.3 kilotons. Reactors are fairly tough structures to contain the forces within so a 152mm shell or two hitting a plant is not an issue reallly

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              no it wasn't, stop spreading bullshit, there are theories about there being a minimal nuclear event inside the fuel rods, but those are theories, and not what caused the reactor vessel to rupture:
              https://phys.org/news/2017-11-theory-rewrites-moments-chernobyl-disaster.html
              also again, it's a theory.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >which is not possible accidentally
      >"Hey, Ivan, you really shouldn't put this stuff into the reactor in order to save space. It might blow up the reactor."
      >"Blayt, fuck yourself, I do whatever I want!"
      Wow, that was easy.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Russians just keep amazing me with their incredible ability to be dastardly devils who keep managing to lower the bar for human decency further and further into the abyss.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You can thank the Mongols for that. They still haven't overcome the rape trauma.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        what rape trauma? russians love that shit.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Normal people don't. That's the difference.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i know it's their lands and that there are alot of civilians left in ukraine. BUT why don't they just fucking blow up that plant so the russians can pay for their dumbass mistake. Both sides will suffer, but atleast ukraine would get international help to remove radiation from the land, and russia would have to deal with radiation poisoning on their own (they would fail miserably)

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If anything it's wind. Ukraine and Belarus are on the west end of a low-pressure area, and LPAs turn counterclockwise.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what the fuck is vatnik's problem?
    anons i'm ngl this shit is kinda scary, even if nothing hits that fallout ammo dump, i'm not gonna be surprised if russians fuck something up themselves. we all saw on countless videos how competent they are.
    and this is the biggest nuclear power plant in europe

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Eh. If it goes off it's the Turks who'll get the fallout. And who gives a shit about them.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Turkey is NATO
        know what that means?
        Article 5

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >was of accident, we of no control the wind

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            extreme negligence like that may not have triggered war back in the 80s but we're already in a war and it's easy to see Russia's fuckups contaminating other countries at this point
            You could easily conscrue a meltdown event or similar as an attack, or a severe breach of your borders unintentional or not

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >we're already in a war
              Ukraine is. NATO is not.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well, true, but point still stands that Russia can accidentally hit shit outside of its own borders and you can still call it an unprovoked attack done out of negligence

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                NATO doesn't want to engage a war with Russia though if it can be avoided. That is exactly why NATO countries are supplying Ukraine with all that fancy shit right now - they want to make sure that the Russian army dies in Ukraine so that monke can't even think of going against Poland or Romania.

                If one lone reactor blows up and starts contaminating one NATO country or two that's a tragedy, but probably not enough to unleash the dogs of war.

                Sadly.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's literally exactly the thing you'd declare a war over. Russia contaminating your country for decades because they couldn't keep themselves in check? No fly zone, bomb their everything and let Ukraine clean up the rest.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You wouldn't, if the alternative is straight up WW3. A little bit of fallout is still better than the entirety of Eurasia breathing gamma radiation for the next couple weeks.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, you don't. Letting Russia get away with blowing up a nuclear reactor and forcing the creation of a second exclusion zone would create precedent that you can somehow get away with irradiating another country for thousands of years in war.
                Instead you give him a clear ultimatum, ranging from "pull back to these lines or we will destroy your invasion force" or "pull out of the country or we will destroy your invasion force."
                You don't know when the next time they'll claim an accident happened close to European borders and irradiated an entire small country, like the Baltics.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >would create precedent
                I'm talking about one lonesome incident. Once is an accident, twice is a coincidence, thrice enemy action.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So letting a country that purposegully terrorizes the other ruin the literal earth for thousands of years should be permitted 3 times before we get mad because it could've been an accident? Despite it being entirely facilitated by Russian cruelty, guile and neglect.? No. Crack their skulls.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm sure HATO will consider your suggestions.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                As a voting and tax paying HATO citizen my voice is heard and im calling for rolling nuclear extinction barrage from st petersburg to vladivostok. For world peace and global human prosperity.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, you don't. Letting Russia get away with blowing up a nuclear reactor and forcing the creation of a second exclusion zone would create precedent that you can somehow get away with irradiating another country for thousands of years in war.
                Instead you give him a clear ultimatum, ranging from "pull back to these lines or we will destroy your invasion force" or "pull out of the country or we will destroy your invasion force."
                You don't know when the next time they'll claim an accident happened close to European borders and irradiated an entire small country, like the Baltics.

                So letting a country that purposegully terrorizes the other ruin the literal earth for thousands of years should be permitted 3 times before we get mad because it could've been an accident? Despite it being entirely facilitated by Russian cruelty, guile and neglect.? No. Crack their skulls.

                What are the chances if something does happen, other countries will get directly involved, can't imagine "nuclear terrorism" being a divisive target on stopping

                Perhaps the United States should publicly declare that any destruction (intentional or otherwise) of Ukrainian nuclear reactors will be regarded to be an act of nuclear terrorism, "requiring a full retaliatory response" (as JFK put it) on the Russian Federation.

                If they still don't get the message at that point, then immediate First Strike is not only warranted, but essential.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Joe Biden, in Marlon Brando impression
                >"I am a superstituous man"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Basically this.. its so weird Russia keeps getting away with demands as the weaker position
                >we know you're nukes will completey wipe us out, but some of you will still die!
                It's like they're aware how little value their lives hold compared to a westerner

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >then immediate First Strike is not only warranted
                midnight 24th of February warranted a full overwhelming nuclear first strike

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I fully expect a nuclear fallout within three months.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How does taking over a nuclear power plant work? You have to keep it running or a big oopsie happens, but it seems like it would be difficult at best to have that happen when all the engineers are civilians of the nation you're invading.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you surround the area and have checkpoints to see who enters and exits

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What caliber is an nuclear power plant?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      6 gorillion megatons

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If it seriously looks like the Russians are about to cause yet another Chernobyl, NATO should just start massive airstrikes on all Russian troop concentrations in Ukraine immediately, followed by a demand for complete and unconditional withdrawal or we start bombing Russian soil.

    >inb4 nukes

    If the Russians seriously think this geopolitical chimpout is worth starting a nuclear war over, then we're wasting our time trying to reason with these people and should have struck first already.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What are the chances if something does happen, other countries will get directly involved, can't imagine "nuclear terrorism" being a divisive target on stopping

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Let's paint a picture.
    >be vatnik command
    >ukies keep blowing up your depots
    >distant monke screeching ia getting louder
    >suddenly, brilliant idea
    >start storing fuel and explosives at nuke reactor you captured
    >ukies don't blow it up
    >smugvatnik.txt
    >soon, reactor depot is the only depot left on the Southern front
    >all shells and rockets for everywhere between Kherson and Mariupol are stored here
    >all 50+year old munitions thrown everywhere like a landfill
    >smoooooker strikes again, but for real this time
    >Halifax 2: Nuclear Boogaloo happens

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its smart in a dickish way, since its the best way to defend against himars blowing your ammo up

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Every country with nukes uses them as a deterrence. not just russia. You attack us we end the world, the viewpoint of almost every major country. Uk for example. Right now they have the lowest number of People in the Military. the lowest in the past 300 years infact. yet there still a major Power in the world due to the fact they gave zaddy America the gluck gluck 9000 for a shit ton of nukes. i say Britain is just the first country to do this. id say soon, probably not in our lifetime though. everyone is gonna Ditch big armys and just horde nukes to get what they want, the more nukes the country has the more they can dominate. always inchs from pulling the trigger, the only thing stopping them is the fact they will give them selfs a long long painful death compared to the country that there shooting at/ like a gun the instantly kills your enemy but there another barrel always pointing at your thigh. In that i wouldn't be surprised thats how we get world peace,

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      risky strategy, what if some country suddenly develops the ability to 99-100% reliably intercept/somehow neutralize nukes?

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just had a thought... what if this was all some ploy from Russia to encourage further fossil fuel dependence
    >"da, look how dangerous nuclear plants are if the enemy takes them, buy our gas yes?"
    Real rabbi strategy if true.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There is nuclear energy commission or something like. Every country using nuclear energy has to give free access to guys from the commission. Am I wrong?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The IAEA. But IAEA safeguards are mostly there to keep people from stealing uranium/plutonium and making atom bombs. They don't oversee the day to day safety of plants.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this

    [...]

    might explain why they're moving shit into the plant now

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      nah, russian stupidity explains it.
      otherweise they'd just fall back and leave.

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what are the chances of somebody purposely
    do a demon core inside and wipe out a platoon?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Ukrainian mayor shares cryptic post about deadly 'incident' at Russian-controlled plant
      >"In the afternoon, 9 soldiers of the terrorist country were urgently delivered to the city hospital with injuries of varying degrees of severity," Orlov said. "Some are treated on an outpatient basis, some are hospitalized. One of them in serious condition — in intensive care. There are also dead people, but we cannot name their exact number at the moment. We will not guess what caused the simultaneous 'thinning' of the ranks of the occupiers at the facility, which they seem to carefully 'guard'. I think the competent services will say about this later."
      https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/foreign/ukraine-cryptic-deadly-incident-russian-controlled-power-plant
      May have actually happened a few days ago. Apparently they just 'dropped dead'.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Already happened

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    not great, not terrible

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why hasnt this been flooded on 4chan yet?

    didnt check out? once again.... 🙁

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >russkies blow up nuclear plant
    >cause nuclear winter
    >cools down EU heatwave

Your email address will not be published.