Russia just deployed their own version of the GLSDB

>NEW RUSSIAN GLIDE BOMB:The bomb is called UMPB D-30SN (Universal'nyy Mezhvidovoy Planiruyushchiy Boyepripas) which means Universal Interspecific Glide Ammunition.
>The bomb can be both air-launched and ground-launched using a Tornado-S rocket and has a 100kg warhead.
>It’s similar to the US GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb (SDB) which is also a dedicated glide bomb that can be air-launched or ground-launched from HIMARS rocket launchers.
https://twitter.com/VerumReports/status/1766449215389966663?t=ky1Kr1podf3RDAH-pIzmEA&s=19

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    someone post the pics of the home brew boards found inside that Russian cruise missile.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >BLYAT BLYAT WE HAVE OF GLIDE BOMB TOO!!!!!!!!!
      Yeah, whatever.

      This kek, the ones with the D-SUB connector or whatever that they soldered loose wires to.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        there we go!

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Thanks anon!

          Daily reminder to all vatniks here that the SDB is not technically impressive, it was an INS glide bomb with a low explosive yield made to be cheap, long range (important for stand off), relatively stealthy (the size and shape of it), usable in large numbers (F-16s can carry 8 vs 2 or 4 JDAMs) and easily adoptable by all US aircraft. The GLSDB configuration was proposed in the 2000s and ignored because the job of dropping SDBs was assigned to the plentiful fighters available.

          Some drunken Russian subhumans figuring out how to do something vaguely similar is not impressive. Come back when you have something similar to StormBreaker, then you can claim to be stuck in roughly 2012.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            i am still trying to find that absolutely hand built board fished out of the crash site of a hypersonic missile. It looked like something someone with no idea what they were doing would put together.

        • 1 month ago
          Caius

          Oh hai someone actually saved it.

          I'll get u guys some guts of this new baloney as soon as the shill meme heat dies down. It's technically interesting that they're trying to push the same feature branches across two distinct products (powered and unpowered) with at least three distinct BOMs in circulation, but the powered glide bomb itself isn't tactically interesting. It's pure bloat on top of a product they were kinda sorta beginning to refine to reasonable levels. The russian MOD has a preternatural ability to sabotage projects in this way.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I remember making boards like that in grade 7 for the meme

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It now makes a lot of sense that the first glide bomb both looked like crap and looked super expensive to make with that machined block of aluminum.

          It was an interim design, created just so the Russians have something while the proper one was cooking.

          Thought that raises the question of why the Russians haven't bothered to build a proper SDB during the past decades.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Monke wanted propaganda weapons: hypersonics, the T-14, Su-57, doomsday torpedoes, etc. Glide bombs weren't on the list.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Russia develops (read: steals) new thing.
    >It doesn't work

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Wait. It's already being used in the war?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's already in a field.
      Having failed to detonate.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder when will the PLA start adopting something similar for their PHL-03 and PHL-191, it would give them cheaper long range strike capability against targets located in Taiwan for a fraction of the price of the existing 300mm guided rockets.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why would it be cheaper? The entire point of the American version is that it's made out of old stockpiled parts that would otherwise have gone to waste. Unless China and Russia have similar stockpiles of similar parts that would similarly have gone unused, then it stops being cheap.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    No, you're a bunch of animals who can't do anything correctly. You're making brag threads about something that was kinda outdated in 2006.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    this isnt DIY though, this is supposed to be military hardware. It being built to shit specifications means it will preform poorly, or not work at all. The above pic found in similar bombs shows its not at all standardized in manufacturing or in even utilization in the final product. Its garbage, no other fighting force other than insurgents should be stooping to this level.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >I understand its about looksmaxxing for most people, but come on. If a guy can get a girl with absolutely no effort, you wouldnt tell the guy he should invest more time and effort into trying to get a girlfriend.
    Oh, you're an incel. Yeah nobody cares about your opinion on military procurement buddy.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Haha, you used an analogy, that makes you an incel. Checkmate bro.

      This board man, you tourists have ruined it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's the choice of analogy, the use of "looksmaxxing", and the bit about MICs wanting billions for "space tech that does exactly the same".

        If the entire combined might Russian Federation can't figure out laser/millimeter radar/uncooled thermal guidance and put it in a single package, that's ok, but you need to stop making it out to be a fault of the west. It is your own fault that you can't build these things.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You're moronic and know nothing about military tech.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >at the same time you are also belittling the Ukrainian one.
    Reminder that Ukraine is the POOREST country in europe. When the scrappy little guy is making old tech work to kill thousands of invaders, it gets cheered on. When the global superpower that has been threatening to destroy the world for years uses busted old tech, we can see their superpower budget just paid for dachas

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    God I can't wait for Ukraine to get F-16s so you can see what proper western tech can do. All you'll have is troony porn.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >win a war
    Steady on mate, you can say that once you’re occupying kyiv, so far it’s a slow grinding advance over years with the loss of hundreds of thousands of russian lives. (I know Russian lives are completely worthless to russians, but I think that’s bad)

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    (nta)
    You have a point. Why over complicate things when 'rock' works?
    The problem here is 'rock' isn't working.
    Before this conflict, countries at least respected Russia militarily. Now, they are less than Pakistan tier (has nukes, nothing much else).
    It has been a disaster. And to pretend that the ancient, low tech weaponry we're seeing on the front line is a choice 'because it works' is a lie.
    tl;dr You are either a troll, or haven't been watching the same war.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >n-nooo we’re actually the underdog
    Pathetic

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    we normally teach this to 6 year olds but it seems you need it

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    > You have focused all of your military tech to precisely destroy vehicles and troops. Both things Russia cares little about.
    OK I have no fricking idea how to argue against this. This is sub-insect level thinking.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      My favorite part is that he has no idea why you'd want a seeker that does millimeter radar, infrared and laser guidance in one package. If he was acting any smarter I'd say that he was baiting but I think he's serious.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >nothing is going to change the outcome
    the only way America could change the outcome is supporting Russia, because otherwise they're fricked

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >using the fricking Zerg as an example
    This has to be bait.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Ok, so they’re going to try and genocide every single remaining ukranian at the expense of taking further horrible losses themselves? You’re damn right it’s not going on forever

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      At the attrition ratio they're enduring, they'll all be dead long before the Ukrainians.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Gaahhh I’m being baited but I can’t stop replying Russians aren’t breeding like zerg…

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Ah yes, zerg has to do no resource management. That is why they generally need to have one extra base compared to protoss or terran or they get curbstomped.
    Maybe consider breathing through your mouth sometime since clearly your nose isn't allowing enough oxygen to reach your brain.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Does it have fuze options?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Depends on yourt definition. The fuze is optional, depending on who stole the funds and/or hardware.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    A couple more years of this and Russian oligarchs will all have smaller, shabbier yachts than Nigerian oligarchs and when that happens Putin is in danger. You can't steal from the government if the government is throwing all its material possessions into a bonfire.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    They have plenty of problems equipping their forces, regardless of where they're from. You're grasping at straws, it's not going to change anything.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >modern warfare is just like my vidya
    You have to go back

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Definitely. They will pave the way for columns of T-14 tanks entering Kiev while Su-57s fly unimpeded. Meanwhile any Western nation who threatens the mighty Russia will get a Poseidon launched at their shores. I believe Russia is strong and not weak and pathetic at all.

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Russia is going to be poorer than Nigeria in your lifetime

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Ideally, you should kys. It’s what zigger subhumans do

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >A couple years from now Russian oligarchs will laugh all the way to the bank while their yachts now dwarf US aircraft carriers

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    If only Russia had done this at the start of the war.
    Imagine how many lives would have been saved.
    Think of the equipment they'd still have available.
    And they'd still have some respect as a military power.
    I'll never understand Russian military planning. Or propaganda for that matter.
    It's all so, ad hoc.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I mean they legitimately thought they could just roll into Kiev in a couple of days like it was the 1956 Hungarian revolution all over again.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You are moronic and this has to be bait I can't believe you're this dumb.
    The EU, without the USA, Can, UK or Ukraine, alongside various other potential allies has 3.5x the population of Russia. With them its almost 10 times the population of Russia.
    If you were Chinese you'd have a point because youd be almost 1:1 population wise with the west, but Russia has 145million people, this is not enough to just zerg Europe, especially with a negative birth rate.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >You are moronic and this has to be bait I can't believe you're this dumb.
      Dude /misc/ went nuts and celebrated this as is Russians had just first landed on Mars.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        for real?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yes. This was celebrated last night as further proof that Russian rocket engineering is decades ahead of the West.

          >Soviet Union’sMars 3, which landed in 1971, was the first successful Mars landing
          They actually did

          Kek I'll give you a technical win, which is the best kind of win, but you know what I meant.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Soviet Union’sMars 3, which landed in 1971, was the first successful Mars landing
        They actually did

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      and it's not as if they can just throw the entirety of that population in the meat grinder. putin would be strung naked upside down by his feet in red square if he were dumb enough to do that.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >this is what third worlders actually believe
    Lol. Lmao even.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why are they still dying in droves if they already won?

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    hilarious! this is the dribble the german AFD russlanddeutsch usually spew.

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >neutroooler

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I have some issues with presentation of the "neutrooler", because I believe the assumption that they're pro-russian is completely false

      nothing they say is pro-russian, they're trying to make killing russians socially acceptable

      a false flag operation

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Bruh, a GLSDB costs something like $40,000, it's made entirely of off-the-shelf parts, and we have enough parts to make a couple hundred thousand of them. I don't think you understand the situation. That is "rock" for the drinkable tap water club.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >make a couple hundred thousand of them
      Russia makes nothing only sadness!

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Russia just deployed their own version of the GLSDB
    top secret intel photo hot off the presses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *