I keep seing this Russian wonderwaffen pop up like it's special, it isn't even good
RASIT from France.
1975.
Detects personnel from 14km away.
It's been replaced by the MURIN radar in 2019, picrel.
This one also serves as a counter-battery radar.
Do you still get paid if one of your post back-fires spectacularly like this ? I feel you shouldn't cos it was just lazy but maybe your handler won't notice ?
You haven't provided any specific model for us to compare so no example would serve as a comparison.
Name the model you think is superior to NATO models and some anon might waste some time naming the competing model that out does it.
Not that you'd accept those proofs of course, you're just here to shitpost.
>You haven't provided any specific model for us to compare so no example would serve as a comparison.
did you? >Name the model you think is superior to NATO models and some anon might waste some time naming the competing model that out does it.
it seems like you already knew their perfomance so post it >Not that you'd accept those proofs of course, you're just here to shitpost. >proofs
where in your original post were those? >you're just here to shitpost
says the dude that concluded two systems he has no clue about that one was clearly inferior because...of reasons
You still won't be specific because you're just shit posting.
You want to be vague, have someone else be specific then you can say that you weren't talkin about that or it doesn't count or some other proof roostering.
The attempt is transparent because everyone's seen it dozens of times before.
Why are you even doing this anon, what do you get out of it?
>You still won't be specific because you're just shit posting.
oh yes?
Nothing as shitty as this
ukraine has NATO counter battery radar, even personnel detector radar
It's all significantly better than whatever shit pussia fields
>Nothing as shitty as this >ukraine has NATO counter battery radar, even personnel detector radar >It's all significantly better than whatever shit pussia fields
>You want to be vague,
ill ask again since you clearly tested both give us the info or at least stop being a girl tht gaslights everyone >The attempt is transparent because everyone's seen it dozens of times before.
it seems like we reached an impasse
you cant seem to back your own words and you are too immature to have any sort of adult conversation without resorting try and paint me some the usual suspect to escape the hard position you put your self into
and im too mature to continue giving you fuel for your bullshit that you obviously will never back up
To sum up the last thread, russian ground radar is complete ass and is a necessity based on the fact steppemorons cannot into widespread issue of night vision and thermals.
If one country has something that nobody else copies (if it’s something that could easily be copied) it’s a pretty good indicator that the object in question is dogshit.
>Nato fields nothing like this.
Correct, NATO does not routinely use radar that requires a parabolic dish, it's all AESA and successor technologies now.
>How can they compete?
we had this thread already and what people pointed out is that the civilized world already completed that research tech tree and found that individual thermal and night-vision was better. but Russia is too poor of a shithole to afford their troops appropriate equipment, so they use that garbage instead. it's 1980s tech.
>NATO >"competing" with Russia
The premise is ridiculous. A major league baseball team doesn't "compete" with kids in fucking Little League. Russia's true peers are with the other thirdie kleptocracies.
Nothing as shitty as this
ukraine has NATO counter battery radar, even personnel detector radar
It's all significantly better than whatever shit pussia fields
>even personnel detector radar
>It's all significantly better than whatever shit pussia fields
May we see it?
Search for
>AN/PPS-5A Radar
From the 70's
Retard
I keep seing this Russian wonderwaffen pop up like it's special, it isn't even good
>AN/PPS-5A Radar
MFW the 5C can even discern between a T-72 and a Caterpillar D7
Rusmorons will never
RASIT from France.
1975.
Detects personnel from 14km away.
It's been replaced by the MURIN radar in 2019, picrel.
This one also serves as a counter-battery radar.
Do you still get paid if one of your post back-fires spectacularly like this ? I feel you shouldn't cos it was just lazy but maybe your handler won't notice ?
They get whipped for every reply
>It's all significantly better than whatever shit pussia fields
im assuming you have a source or we can trust that somehow you were able to field both of them and you conluded that?
You haven't provided any specific model for us to compare so no example would serve as a comparison.
Name the model you think is superior to NATO models and some anon might waste some time naming the competing model that out does it.
Not that you'd accept those proofs of course, you're just here to shitpost.
>You haven't provided any specific model for us to compare so no example would serve as a comparison.
did you?
>Name the model you think is superior to NATO models and some anon might waste some time naming the competing model that out does it.
it seems like you already knew their perfomance so post it
>Not that you'd accept those proofs of course, you're just here to shitpost.
>proofs
where in your original post were those?
>you're just here to shitpost
says the dude that concluded two systems he has no clue about that one was clearly inferior because...of reasons
You still won't be specific because you're just shit posting.
You want to be vague, have someone else be specific then you can say that you weren't talkin about that or it doesn't count or some other proof roostering.
The attempt is transparent because everyone's seen it dozens of times before.
Why are you even doing this anon, what do you get out of it?
>what do you get out of it
rubles
>You still won't be specific because you're just shit posting.
oh yes?
>Nothing as shitty as this
>ukraine has NATO counter battery radar, even personnel detector radar
>It's all significantly better than whatever shit pussia fields
>You want to be vague,
ill ask again since you clearly tested both give us the info or at least stop being a girl tht gaslights everyone
>The attempt is transparent because everyone's seen it dozens of times before.
it seems like we reached an impasse
you cant seem to back your own words and you are too immature to have any sort of adult conversation without resorting try and paint me some the usual suspect to escape the hard position you put your self into
and im too mature to continue giving you fuel for your bullshit that you obviously will never back up
here is your (you)
Simple, by continuing as normal, because these are a meme at best
https://www.defenceweb.co.za/land/land-land/cassidian-has-developed-the-most-powerful-ground-surveillance-radar-worldwide/
https://kurier.plus/en/node/1167
This again?
It hasnt even been 3 weeks.
To sum up the last thread, russian ground radar is complete ass and is a necessity based on the fact steppemorons cannot into widespread issue of night vision and thermals.
If one country has something that nobody else copies (if it’s something that could easily be copied) it’s a pretty good indicator that the object in question is dogshit.
It's a shame the USSR copied it from the ebil wect kek
Exactly this when I see the gazillionth exoskeleton thread on PrepHole
>Nato fields nothing like this.
Correct, NATO does not routinely use radar that requires a parabolic dish, it's all AESA and successor technologies now.
*checks radar*
Comrades something is coming
"we don't have shit sir let's fall back"
>move to new position
>rinse and repeat
>How can they compete?
we had this thread already and what people pointed out is that the civilized world already completed that research tech tree and found that individual thermal and night-vision was better. but Russia is too poor of a shithole to afford their troops appropriate equipment, so they use that garbage instead. it's 1980s tech.
only one?
>NATO
>"competing" with Russia
The premise is ridiculous. A major league baseball team doesn't "compete" with kids in fucking Little League. Russia's true peers are with the other thirdie kleptocracies.