Russia has now lost 1/3rd of its initial number of tanks

How long can it keep this up?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    t-55 us still perfectly capable tank btw

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      honestly t-34s are perfectly adequate for the needs of the special military operation

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        what needs are those?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          to embarrass your military in a grandiose manner

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          vatBlack person coffins

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Coffins

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Scrap metal donations.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Portable dogfood dispensers.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Special.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            jej

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          bulletproof, has cannon and treads.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          special needs

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Meat cauldrons

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Existing

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          banan

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          scrap metal

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Needs?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Special needs for special military operation.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Special needs for special military operation

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >t-34
        You mean the T-26 surely comrade?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Toyota with mashine gun, still relevant.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            BS…a Toyota Hilux with ten slingers in the back.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Imagine a Hilux with a turret with 4 groups of 4 RPGs synced up

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Toyota with mashine gun, still relevant.
            Lada granta with machine gun when?
            This step seems obvious.

            REAL FIGURES
            Details: Total combat losses of the Russian forces between 24 February and 18 July 2022 comprise approximately:

            38,450 (+150) military personnel

            1,687 (+3) tanks

            3,886 (+7) armoured combat vehicles

            849 (+3) artillery systems

            248 (+0) multiple rocket launchers

            113 (+3) pieces of air defence equipment

            220 (+0) planes

            188 (+0) helicopters

            690 (+2) operational-tactical UAVs

            166 (+0) cruise missiles

            15 (+0) ships/boats

            2,753 (+7) pieces of automotive equipment and fuel tanks

            70 (+2) pieces of special equipment

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >38,450 (+150) military personnel
              that's twice what we lost in Nam in 78

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/XXEvvgs.jpg

                Or Bees

                Basically Russia has lost half its tanks, half its ground force personnel, 1/5th of its air force and 1/5th of its artillery (if you count vast worthless reserves that go bang). In reality Russia has lost ALL of its 1200 tanks modernised since 2000, ALL of their professional contract forces that were in the 120,000 sent in the initial invasion. They now euthanise the severely burned and injured in military hospitals due to disruption in the medical supply chain. The suicide rate amongst doctors and nurses in military hospitals has doubled. Grim Grim Grim stuff. Congratulations Vlad you completely fricked up Russia.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I feel like some of this may be exaggerated

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >I feel like some of this may be exaggerated
                If you were feeling that the Ukrainians are understating Russian losses by about 20% you would be nearer reality

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >I feel like some of this may be exaggerated
                Is that because it is not a war but just a special military operation?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                None of this matters though due to nooks.
                >Captcha: NJGGR

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I really wish they'd separate it by losses by branch of military as well.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The vast majority are concentrated in the ground forces where are approaching 50% kia/mia/wia and by wia I mean properly maimed for life missing limb/tarded/melty monster

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I know, but saying they've lost 85% of initial invasion forces then following it up by saying 18% of their total military personnel creates a distorted image when the Russian Ground Forces is only about 31% of their total military personnel.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >source: some Horilka-drenched butthole

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Eh, the BT-5s will do.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        No comrade, we need our t-34s for war movies. Is serious business, you know.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Russia has fewer than a dozen working T-34s strictly for parade duty.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >the needs of the special military operation
        more like special needs military operation

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This is no big deal when the Chinese, Venezuelans and North Koreans show up Ukraine and NATO are doomed.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Venezuelans
      Yeah, umm, they all moved to Miami.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Worse burgers have been cutting deals to bring them into their sphere.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >The first batch of T-14s will be delivered shortly

    We are more likely to see a unit of Cho'ma'hos than Armatas, those at least can move under their own power.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Probably until Ukraine surrenders.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The only actual answer.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Probably until Ukraine surrenders.

      So when He’ll freezes over? Got it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Even if Ukraine was to surrender (which it won't, considering how much support they are getting) Russia would still need more tanks, the IED these people would make in an insurgency would probably be the most advanced ever seen. This isn't the kind of war that ends with a surrender.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It’s dumb projecting the insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan onto Ukraine. Zelensky’s regime has recruiters driving around conscripting unsuspecting citizens at gunpoint, like a South American kidnapping.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          man, what a scary regime
          that's probably why people greeted russians as liberators with bread and flowers instead of javelins and artillery shells

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            There are plenty of cases where locals greeted Russian troops with open arms.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I remember that
              Early on in the war the NLAW was their favourite arm to greet russians with, but an impressively wide variety of other arms were used as well

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Underrated

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >It’s dumb projecting the insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan onto Ukraine. Zelensky’s regime has recruiters driving around conscripting unsuspecting citizens at gunpoint, like a South American kidnapping.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          eat shit and die zigger

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous
        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Zelensky’s regime has recruiters driving around conscripting unsuspecting citizens at gunpoint, like a South American kidnapping.

          Main rule about russians: they are always guilty of whatever they are accusing you of doing.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            That's conservatives in general.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              post guns

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Back to your safe space/containment board, troony:

              [...]

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Eat shit.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >source: my HIV-riddled prolapsed butthole

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Cope and seethe, but it sounds like you’ve done enough dilation already.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >still no source
              You GOTTA come up with better bait than this if you wanna avoid looking like a complete fricking tool, vatBlack person.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                This is the part where you cry “NOOO not that source, these proofs are not proving anything” like a good little shill who will earn their Elgin AFB monkeypox service badge

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Where is the actual video, you absolute dipshit? Anyone can post a non-descriptive screencap and slap on a caption with whatever they want.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          There's literal video evidence of this happening in donbabwe.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            At least you understand that DPR is not part of Ukraine, even if the rest of your argument was moronic whataboutusm 🙂

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              It's not under the control of Ukraine, so it's not Ukraine, yes. It's not the Ukrainian authorities doing it over there.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Lol at the hohols denying this and yet seething so hard over it….

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          LMAO, vatBlack folk projecting yet again, I see.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Even shilling from a script can’t hide how much of a dumb frick you are personally lol

            NY Times even mentioned questionable “street recruiting” practices in Ukraine
            https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/25/world/middleeast/ukraine-soldiers-recruitment-draft.html

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              This is a fricking war of national survival against total extermination. Everyone who can fight should be fighting anyway.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                So we have come full circle with hohol coping

                >Ukraine will have an insurgency even if Russia wins
                Then why do they have to drive around abducting people and forcing them to fight now?
                >they don’t! You made that up! VATNIK VATNIK VATNIK!!!1!!!!one!!!1
                proofs provided
                >well that’s what they should be doing anyway

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Ukraine will have an insurgency even if Russia wins
                Which is what's happening in Kherson

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >My source is that I made it the frick up

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Blow it out your ass

            Even shilling from a script can’t hide how much of a dumb frick you are personally lol

            NY Times even mentioned questionable “street recruiting” practices in Ukraine
            https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/25/world/middleeast/ukraine-soldiers-recruitment-draft.html

            https://i.imgur.com/3zMm8IY.jpg

            https://i.imgur.com/oe2ktkr.jpg

            This is the part where you cry “NOOO not that source, these proofs are not proving anything” like a good little shill who will earn their Elgin AFB monkeypox service badge

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I mean you're right but for the completely wrong reasons. There's nothing unusual about a draft of male citizens when your country is being invaded, literally every fricking nation in the world would and has done it.

          That said insurgencies in Afghanistan had very favorable terrain, were fighting an enemy that was literally on the other side of the world, and were religious fundamentalist extremists.

          Ukraine has terrible flat terrain for a defense, is on Russia's doorstep, and the regions Russia is trying to hold have a sizable Russian population already in them. Insurgency in the eastern regions is kind of a dumb meme. Ukraine will probably only win this conventionally, which they very well might.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            what are the current odds for Ukraine?
            they seem to have an unlimited supply of shit and Russia kinda seems like its running out of shit.
            Like, 100,000 conscripts won't help much if all your armor is dead...right?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              depends on how well their upcoming counteroffensive in Kherson goes.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Blow it out your ass

          [...]
          [...]
          [...]

          [...]

          >recruiters driving around conscripting unsuspecting citizens at gunpoint, like a South American kidnapping
          >proofs: oh heres a single news article saying Ukraine is handing out conscription notices
          kek. Next time read your own links before posting them moron.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Oryx has kind of given up btw
    He's far, far behind the real number

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      More like far, far ahead of it tbh

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        no

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            nope

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Oryx's number is a confirmed lowest possible estimate. It is always below the actual number of losses. Deal with it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He's only counting the ones people send in photos or videos of. IIRC people were estimating he was counting about 40% of actual losses.

      Minusrus says the Russians have lost 1738 tanks so far, which is far above what the Russians originally committed to the invasion last February. The fact that they're sending T-64's to the front lines now pretty much proves they've run out of modern tanks in their reserve rustpiles.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        you mean t-62 ? cause t-64 are still a very capable tank, better than early t72 variants like urals

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Oryx has kind of given up btw
      >He's far, far behind the real number
      See

      https://i.imgur.com/np67R4t.jpg

      >Toyota with mashine gun, still relevant.
      Lada granta with machine gun when?
      This step seems obvious.

      REAL FIGURES
      Details: Total combat losses of the Russian forces between 24 February and 18 July 2022 comprise approximately:

      38,450 (+150) military personnel

      1,687 (+3) tanks

      3,886 (+7) armoured combat vehicles

      849 (+3) artillery systems

      248 (+0) multiple rocket launchers

      113 (+3) pieces of air defence equipment

      220 (+0) planes

      188 (+0) helicopters

      690 (+2) operational-tactical UAVs

      166 (+0) cruise missiles

      15 (+0) ships/boats

      2,753 (+7) pieces of automotive equipment and fuel tanks

      70 (+2) pieces of special equipment

      And that does not clue:
      Radiation poisoning
      Friendly fire
      Suicide
      Fratricide
      Desertion
      Accidents
      Missing
      Prisoner of war
      And remember we are talking about Russians here literally the world leaders in self irradiation, suicide, fratricide, accidents and friendly fire.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Or Bees

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    look, its the low IQ hohol cope posters. Back in March, Russia had already lost half their tanks, remember

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      at a point when T-62s are being deployed, maybe it's time to stop being a smug c**t?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        kek, Ukraine getting BTFO by tanks that are twice as old as their "Country". The only thing older than those tanks might be Ukraine's latest batch of draftees

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          why deploy ancient trashcans that get blown by RPG-7 when you have hundreds of armatas? hmm?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          ukraine precedes russia by countless centuries and really, most 'russian' territory up to the urals is rightful ukrainian clay

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, and this original Ukrainian nation, countless centuries ago, allied with Egypt in the great kangs war, being the first to deploy laser weapons. This is why Ukraine should be paid royalties on any laser diodes manufactured today.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              do you dispute that Kievian Rus was a thing before the Dutchy of Muscovy?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Kievan rus is a term coined in 19th century, Kiev was an extension of the Rus state which started in Novgorod after Novgorodians captured Kiev from some brown slavs

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >which started in Novgorod after Novgorodians
                Ie, not in Moscow.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                So...Ukrainians are the real Russians? Idk, mite b based. Ukrainian revanchists sweeping across the central plains in steel chariots...

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >ukraine precedes russia by countless centuries

              russians are gypsies 🙂

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              The successor state of Kievan Rus will forever be the nation formed around the city of Kyiv, cope and seethe mongoloid.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Kievan Rus
                Its Kyivan Rus, fricking bigot

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Ruthenian was part of Poland longer than it was part of Russia.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >ukraine precedes russia by countless centuries

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Russia: We sent the first man to space
              USA: We sent the first man to the moon
              Ukraine: We wuz kangs countless centuries ago we swear

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                USSR was Ukraine and Russia moron lmao

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                kek, modern day ukraine's only claim to dignity is being part of Russia a few decades ago

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Be real here, that's all Russia can claim too.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >dignity
                >Russia
                Russia has always been a failure. To the average citizen from the Czar to the Reds to the current Mafia state, poverty has been the order of the day. Ukraine sees what direction all the real dignity is and that is why it is desperate to escape to Europe. Ukraine is worse than Russia because of Russia, same with every country in it's rapidly dwindling sphere of influence.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                the soviet union send the first man into space, russia just likes to take credit for it

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The head of the soviet space program, Korolev, was ukrainian. What the frick are you talking about?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Russian tanks have long since stopped being formed into armor spearheads. They now sit in the back like pussies and wait for artillery to clear the way, lest they get an NLAW to the ass from behind any bush.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      And back in February Ukraine had supposedly already lost the war.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >First batch of 14 Armata tanks will be delivered shortly
    Lol, how much you reckon they've gimped it just to get it to work

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!! This is old tanks, we don't need it!

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i think its telling that russia is buying hundreds of drones from iran instead of buying ground vehicles like tanks or apcs. it's clear that the future of war now revolves around drones. tanks are old and busted, literally.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Now that Russia is starting to use T-62s the only people who can help Russia with tanks is the DPRK since they are the only nation capable of making replacement parts. The only compatible parts Iran has come from North Korea or are made in joint ventures with them.

      We are holding to the mutual agreement Trump made with the North to ignore each other so it is unlikely Russia can get parts that way without paying a price in goods and pride they are unwilling to make.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Drones can’t occupy a town.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You’ve clearly never been to Delaware..

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    russia have more tanks and disposable crew than the NATO has ATGM and artillery shell. plus they repair some anyways
    russia's cause is just, victory will be theirs

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      LMAO, no.

      Russia's cause is moronic, extermination will be theirs.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What is Russia's cause at this point anyways, it seems to have changed multiple times

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Nothing has changed, stop lying.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          https://web.archive.org/web/20220226051154/https://ria.ru/20220226/rossiya-1775162336.html

          >"The period of the split of the Russian people is coming to an end. Did someone in the old European capitals, in Paris and Berlin, seriously believe that Moscow would give up Kiev? That the Russians will forever be a divided people?"
          Posted a day or so after invasion, retracted shamefully shortly thereafter, archived for posterity and to BTFO disingenuous homosexuals like you

          >seriously believe that Moscow would give up Kiev?
          That one in particular has got to sting, hm?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Even if the article was true, what changed in the stated objectives?

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    As long as it have too

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        to think images like this was russian government sponsored propaganda all along

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        to think images like this was russian government sponsored propaganda all along

        Russian shills were taking over fricking bigfoot forums back in the 2000s in an effort to radicalize boomer conspiracy theorists. Their propaganda goes deep, anon.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    considering half of it are tanks from the videos cutting in the end or same tanks filmed multiple times i thin kthe number is closer to 300

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Black person, you lost an entire tank BTG ina single river crossing

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        correct me if i'm wrong but russians now control this crossing and area around it, what stops them from repairing damaged and abandoned tanks?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          the same thing that prevents them from repairing 10k tanks stored in siberia

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            So nothing?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              so where's the 10k tanks crushing ukraine under their threads?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                probably undergoing modernisation at UVZ

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                and what do you think is the throughput of UVZ? It's the 6th month of war, mind you

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              nothing except the inevitable consequences of their own culture lmao

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              the same thing that prevents them from repairing 10k tanks stored in siberia

              so where's the 10k tanks crushing ukraine under their threads?

              probably undergoing modernisation at UVZ

              Probably Kim waiting for the grain/oil/non palletized gold bars to arrive in exchange for the spare parts that Russia can't make any more.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I don't think you've noticed, but all soviet and russian tanks store ammo inside the hull and usually blow up catastrophically after a penetrating hit. Also ukrs had access to those tanks for quite some time.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    How many M1A1s has the US lost?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Less than they can produce

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >meanwhile
    >deep in the Siberian taiga
    >the storage of ten thousand tanks
    >The Secret of Ukraine Island.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm sure many of their good tanks are still up, and they've got a near endless supply of T-80s before they start dragging out the older T-72s. The T-62s are just for their Ukrainian militias.
    I predict Russia will have manpower problems before they have serious material problems.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Buddy, you realize they STARTED with T-80s, right? They even kept it going after they didn't reach their three day deadline and still kept it going for like a month after that.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No, majority of their early loses were T-90A, T-80BVM and T-72B3. Only modern tank category that didn't get blasted is T-90m (only 2 losses).

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I don't know why NATO people are celebrating this? Ukraine is never going to become a safe space for gays and trannies.
    At this point Ukraine and Russia speak eye to eye, like brothers do. But in 5 years time or so, Ukraine and Russia will remember they're brothers again, and then Russia will have access to all the NATO goodies you're sending over.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Bait

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Wow, anon, you don't say? What gave it away? The obvious fricking pic?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >At this point Ukraine and Russia speak eye to eye

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      At least a generation will have to pass before Ukrainians will forget that vatniks came to murder their kids and rape their women.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        > murder their kids and rape their women
        you've got that the wrong way around, these are russians not mongols

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They already do, they've been capturing one a week and can buy them all off the black market.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Get fricking real Vatnik. Ukrainians will never forgive Russia for this war. You maybe had a chance if you were actually able to capture Kyiv in 3 days like Putin planned but after 5 months and tens of thousands at the very least dead Ukrainians will never forgive Russia. Probably every single Ukrainian knows a family member or friend who was killed or maimed by a Russian missile, bullet or bomb. Regardless of who wins this war the hate will run deep and never truly fade.

      This war will be Ukraine's founding mythos. From the horror of this war Ukrainians will abandon the narrative of Russian brotherhood in favour of a distinct Ukrainian history, language and culture. Any idea of a united Russky Mir is dead. Killed by a seventy year old manlet in the Kremlin whose dementia made him dream that he was the restorer of the Soviet Union.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, just how Japan hates us for firebombing all their citizens and nuking them twice.
        Founding mythos. Jesus fricking christ the fan fiction fantasies.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, but the USA won that war and could impose their version of history. Russia isn't going to win this one.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Impose their version of history? What medications are you on? I want some of those.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              What is hard to understand about the fact that America occupied Japan and was able to compel them to accept the American version of how the war started, progressed and finished?
              I didn't think that was difficult to understand, myself.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You mean exactly how Russia is going to occupy Ukraine?
                Good thing you are coming around to it.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Nah, Russia's going to lose. You don't even sound convinced yourself of your position to be honest senpai.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Russia will occupy Ukraine any day now says increasingly nervous Vatnik on his 170th day, 3 day operation.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                doubt.jpg

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Jesus, I legitimately can't tell if there are any differences between those last two pictures.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                in between those pictures is the total collapse of the UAF and 6 gorillion dead hohols

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Cope vatnik. Ukraine is taking back those territories despite your denials.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You fricking moron. How fricking stupid do you have to be to think that the circumstances between Japan and America in the Pacific conflict could be contrasted with the present war in Ukraine?

          You ruined your own fricking argument by brining up WW2 Japan in the first place anyhow. Why don't you think for a second and look at how Korea and China, two nations that actually experienced invasion much like Ukraine is now view the nips.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Pure vatnik seethe.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            But what about the founding mythos? That's some pretty heavy shit. You should write a book.
            Shit maybe even get a pulitzer.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Says the Vatnik whose understanding of history begins and ends with "But we nuked Japan twice and they still like us lul".

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Japan and Germany were actually liberated from a criminal regime and got the benefit of freedom of speech and the American way of life. If Russians took over Ukraine it would be nothing like that. There would be guerilla forever.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Ehh in Japan and Germans case both got uplifted and invested in heavily by America that objectively turned them into economic power houses. So the bigger relations they are allies is all the help and aid given afterwards to let them stand on their feet instead of just suffering under the boot.
            Burgers attempted that in Iraq Africa and Afghanistan but the locals were kind of too useless to actually accomplish anything compared to Japan and Germany with the same amount of aid.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Why do you vatnik project with gays and trannies

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's all they fantasize about sexually. Even their torture sessions are full of gay subtext.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Even their torture sessions are full of gay subtext

          No subtext needed.
          Just gay rape all day, every day.
          Don't even get me started on how their conscripts are raped and sold as prostitutes.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Honestly Ukraine could get at least half the Russian army to defect by simply promising they'll never be raped again.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            FSB had the woman who wrote that article assassinated too after she learned too much.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yes look at the balkans we all really love each other now decades after the wars

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >will remember they're brothers again
      Oh yeah, surely they won't hold any grudges against Russia. Just like none of the old soviet satellites did. This war, rape and abuse will actually bring Ukraine closer to Russia and not make them want to have closer ties to countries that have not invaded it. Lmao. Russia is a barren shithole with a dictator running the show. The people are dumb serfs who are kept in check by propaganda and border wars. Anyone with a brain is fleeing to west :3

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine will run out of able bodied men before Russia runs out of conscripts and tanks.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >we will wait until they run out of men then they will surrender
      france took 5 million casualties in ww1 with a very similar population to modern ukraine, and that cost millions of german lives to accomplish
      vatniks can't even mobilize their reserves because the oligarchs think it will start a civil war lol
      the only hope for puccia is to pull off a miracle on the vistula level breakthrough at this point

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They can just make more dumbass
    It's Russia, after all
    Holy shit /k/ is moronic

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Vatniks can’t makes shit any more due to sanctions. Your cope is unbelievable russBlack person

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Russia's tank factory isn't able to make any more. Russia relies entirely on the west for high tech components like FCS, night vision, computers etc. It can't make it's own and Chinese copies can't compensate. Also, Russia uses exclusively Western machine tools, with service contracts with Western companies. It can't service it's machine tools now, so they're steadily breaking down and they are not able to replace them, either with domestic versions or Chinese.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They can just make more dumbass
        It's Russia, after all
        Holy shit /k/ is moronic

        >Chinese copies
        >Digging out T-62s

        China never produced or used the T-62, North Korea is the only nation besides the USSR that ever produced it and the only place you can get new components.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Russia relies entirely on the west for high tech components like FCS, night vision, computers etc.
        You don't need those for older models
        Again you're an idiot, same with the rest of this board

        Remember when morons argued about Russia running out of ammunition in no time, then it turned out they still had the production capacity to make more

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Remember when morons argued about Russia running out of ammunition in no time, then it turned out they still had the production capacity to make more
          No, I don't remember this. I've heard people say they will run out of missiles or shells but haven't seen anything to suggest they're actually producing more than they use.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You're a liar
            >Russia will run out of ammunition in two weeks!
            was an oft-repeated statement in this board
            have a nice day

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I can remember seeing about 0 claims they would run out of bullets. Notice you haven't event tried to answer the point about missiles or artillery shells so yeah I think you might just be a /misc/ tourist with learning disabilities.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >an oft-repeated statement in this board
              Surely you can provide proofs of this then, vatnik, right? After all, it was oft-repeated.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Russia hasn't produced a new tank for over 20 years, they lost a year of production because they had to send a lend lease machine made in 1942 back to Ohio to be fixed in the 1990s.

          The one time they tried to make prototypes in the last 3 decades it caught fire in a victory day parade. By their own numbers they have managed to make one T-14 for every year the USSR has been gone.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >The one time they tried to make prototypes in the last 3 decades it caught fire in a victory day parade.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Remember when morons argued about Russia running out of ammunition in no time,
          If you are referring to some of the posts I made I suggest your recollection is lacking (you should have a test for early onset dementia) What was said was that the rus would run out of what was allocated for the war, which they did and were forced to dip into their reserves to continue.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >OMG RUSSIA HAS 6 GORILLION 40 YEAR OLD SHELLS THAT HAVE SPENT THE LAST 40 YEARS SITTING IN THE SUN

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Russias ammunition shortage at the front has gotten so bad it is literally visible from space
          You can watch them running out in real time via FIRMS

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    GUYS I JUST READ ON REDDIT THAT RUSSIA IS RUNNING OUT OF [insert thing] HOW MUCH LONGER WILL THEY HOLD OUT???? GHOST OF KIEV BLESS THIS POST!!! I PRAY TO SAINT JAVLIN EVERY NIGHT BEFORE BED!!!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Didn't Russia run out of combat power and have to retreat from Kiev and Karkhiv?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That was a gesture of goodwill.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        merely a feint

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >he fell for the feint
        xaxaxa

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That was so they could launch a devastating encirclement to take .3% of Ukrainians territory over the course of a month.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          most of the army was given extended leave and has been on vacation. trust the plan

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            rare footage of russian soldiers going on their well deserved vacation
            https://twitter.com/BlaszczykArtur/status/1552355775317790721

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              the shores of the acheron are beautiful this time of year

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                grateful novorussian civillians helping russian liberators to board a train home
                https://twitter.com/ChristopherJM/status/1550832661278638081

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        yea, they retreated all the way back to moscow, the ukraine should be done clearing moscow of all the defenders in the next hour psure

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      But what does the reddit frog have to do with that?

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >How long can it keep this up?
    700 years

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i don't think so

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >700 years of vatniks shitting up europe comes to an end with demographic collapse
        would have preferred to let the germans finish the job 80 years ago but I'll take it

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          yes, but there's one problem. While ethnic russian population is collapsing, muslim minorities have positive TRF. There'll be a russian caliphate before a french one.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Can't be much worse than the current Russian government.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Tatar. It will be Tatar, anon.

            There is no Russian future.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    CROSS THE DNIEPER

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The 115mm gun was exclusively used by the T-62 right? Do they even have the ability to make new ammo for it?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I mean they probably have an enormous stockpile of spare rounds. The T-62 was never as widely exported as the T-55 and T-72. The question is: In what condition are those rounds? That's a real concern. In 2003 the US Army assessed some of its old 105mm stockpiles for use in the M1128 MGS and found that a good chunk were beyond usability.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Most tanks were used for parts or written off, wouldn't they have sold off alot of those ammo stocks to the nations that did use it?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Russia still has significant stock of stuff it considers "obsolete".
          Remember how they claimed they no longer had T-62s or BMP-1s and suddenly they showed up in Ukraine? Tochka?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >beyond usability
            i don't think there's a word for that in russian military jargon

            I mean they probably have an enormous stockpile of spare rounds. The T-62 was never as widely exported as the T-55 and T-72. The question is: In what condition are those rounds? That's a real concern. In 2003 the US Army assessed some of its old 105mm stockpiles for use in the M1128 MGS and found that a good chunk were beyond usability.

            I have doubts regarding the safety status of ammunition subjected to 15-20 years more 'deep storage' than the reserves Russia is currently using.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >beyond usability
        i don't think there's a word for that in russian military jargon

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ignore hohol propaganda

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >ignore hohol propaganda
      strong RUSSIAN tanks are made of pure stalinium, indestructible
      https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1552405685387812875

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      this

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        1 and 3 are true, they just had a moronic number of tanks in storage since Soviet Union was doing little else than stockpiling weapons through their entire existence

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Russia having to dip into their Cold War stock after five months in Ukraine kinda fricks Putin's "In a day, I could be in Warsaw, Riga, Kyiv, etc." speech that he gave a few years ago.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        So what if Russia's gas delivery cuts by 80% aren't caused by deliberate action, but due to their equipment breaking down and them being unable to replace and/or maintain it?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          last time the wells froze up it took 20 years to get their production back to 80s volumes. All work done by western companies and maintained by western companies. They will remember the 90s as happy times compred to 2020s lul.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >last time the wells froze up it took 20 years to get their production back to 80s volumes
            Thirty years, and that was oil, not gas - until December of 2021.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              frick Im getting old, 1991 was like yesterday

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            what are the odds that this will happen again?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              The thing that never ceases to amaze me were the shortages on ANYTHING in the USSR. In the 1920s and 30s the Communists clearly demonstrated that they weren't above simply confiscating food and shooting those whom they thought would be working against government orders and quotas, and that worked somewhat. Why didn't they keep at it when people had to wait literally hours in breadlines?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Because it doesn't work? You can only steal until there's nothing left to steal. You can only execute "saboteurs" until there's no one left to do the work. Pure emotion does not change reality, no matter how much schizos (religious or commie) would like it so.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >You can only execute "saboteurs"
                Then relocate some frickers from frick knows where to the place where you expected your food to be grown, and don't even attempt to clean up the blood.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                As Russia is so kindly demonstrating to us: you can lead a (few ten thousand) fools from the most backwater oblast of Russia to a place, but you can't make them think. Whip the mule all you like, it's still not going to win a race.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not suggesting to whip the mule. I'm suggesting to kill it, get a new one, and leave the rotting carcass as a warning. If that doesn't work, go to 10.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                While I'm a great fan of the old "use violence, if that doesn't work use more violence" adage, it just doesn't work when the problems are technical or scientific in nature. Reality doesn't care how much blood you sacrifice to it, it won't budge unless you do it right.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I don't see the problem here:
                >agriculture is neither technical nor scientific
                >so you can just kill your moronic peasants if they don't work
                >if they can't work because agriculture is industrialized and requires stuff like fuel or spare parts, then kindly remind the people in charge of those that they'll be the first ones to go hungry if food shortages occur

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >then kindly remind the people in charge of those that they'll be the first ones to go hungry if food shortages occur

                If the people in charge of those are unable (as opposed to unwilling) to access fuel or tech, then they'll go hungry because they can't do otherwise.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                This is the fricking Soviet Union we're talking about. If they had one thing it's oil (Siberia) and tech (Ukraine). Apparently the USSR really had gone soft at some point and just stopped showing the consequences of workers not working - no wonder they lost the Cold War.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                carrot or the stick but they only had sticks in the first place.certainly not a sign of a working system.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >agriculture is neither technical nor scientific
                Now you're just being disingenuous. Agriculture is 100% technical in nature. If you want an example of non-technical agriculture, refer to the CHAZ community garden (amusingly also done by commies).

                >if they can't work because agriculture is industrialized and requires stuff like fuel or spare parts, then kindly remind the people in charge of those that they'll be the first ones to go hungry if food shortages occur
                That is a bit closer to the actual root of the problem: communism fails at market efficiency because it tries to regulate everything top-down. It's not just micro-management, it's micro-management by idiots who are more interested in making sure no (other) idiots threaten their position.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                commie morons like this help me remember why every commie revolution ends with millions starving

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >they just weren't radical ENOUGH
                >if they had killed more people brutally and publicly it would've worked

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Well, if commies would 100% exterminate themselves it would definitely solve all the problems associated with it

                >Commies are proto-Chaos worshippers

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >agriculture is neither technical nor scientific
                Okay, so you're just moronic. You would have fit in well in S*viet R*ssia. Their Powers That Be were full of drooling mouthbreathers such as yourself.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Actually, no, agriculture can be neither technical nor scientific, but in that case it resembles more than what the Chinese did before the Open Door policy, which was just large-scale gardening. Very labor-intensive, but if all you have are moronic peasants who want to die anyway ... well, the yields are pretty good.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yields are terrible, you mean. You then need 99 peasants to produce enough food for 100 people.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You're exaggerating, but yes, as I said it's a labor-intensive process. But it also requires the least amount of land and resources since each plant is given individual care.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Still wont work. you need correct seeds, correct fertilizers, correct irrigation system. Modern agriculture is 100% technical. sure you can grow crops the old way, but you can only sustain a pre industrial population with that method. That means closet to 80% of your population dies

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Even pre-industrial agriculture was incredibly advanced. Shit like crop rotation and such took centuries (or millennia) to figure out for a reason. It's not an easy endeavor.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                If you want agriculture woth no technical skills whatsoever you could go all the way back to the nomadic hunter-gatherer lifestyle, living in an area for a season or two and then moving on for a while so that the land can regenerate.
                Of course that requires a deeply intimate knowledge of the landscape and ecosystem that your tribe is a part of, accumulated over thousands of generations of experience and tradition - but at least you don't have to know how to drive a tractor!

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >then kindly remind the people in charge of those that they'll be the first ones to go hungry if food shortages occur

                If the people in charge of those are unable (as opposed to unwilling) to access fuel or tech, then they'll go hungry because they can't do otherwise.

                might i introduce you to this tremendous homosexual?
                He basically thought that genes are a degenerate western bourgeoisie invention and gulag'd hundreds of other scientists who dared critique his pet Lysenkoism theory.
                In the end a solid chunk of responsibility for massive famines in the USSR and China can be awarded to him

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                He does look a little bit like Rasputin.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                That Rasputin-Lysenko-Dugin phenotype. A returning curse throughout the ages.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                He does look a little bit like Rasputin.

                That Rasputin-Lysenko-Dugin phenotype. A returning curse throughout the ages.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I hope that there is an afterlife so Fritz Haber can beat you up for eternity.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >agriculture is neither technical nor scientific
                oh really... so that's why commies always create famines

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                the wall was the biggest confession that this system will not survive.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              p=1, pretty much.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Not very high they have food its just too fricking expensive to by going by some of the Russians living in Rostov. He was saying all the shelves are pretty full but no one is really buying anything due to the prices. They have a bigger shortage of electronics and car parts but everything else is plentiful just fricking expensive.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                He also mentioned Food quailty also went to shit for example 73-80 milkfat butter has been replaced with 40-56% abomination butter mixed with some awful filler but for the same price.
                He additionally mentions importing electronics is awful because no one accepts rubles official value so they are basically paying an extra 50-100% and have to wait several weeks for shipments

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The cuts they just made aren't entirely voluntary, they still haven't gotten that turbine back.

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Vladivostok is encircled!
    Putin has Ebola and stage 6 cancer and is moments away from death!
    Slowly losing land for months is merely part of the counter attack!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Slowly losing land for months is merely part of the counter attack!
      Tell me about WW2, vatnik

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Give up frenchies, you're practically finished. Look how much territory we captured.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        frick off krautBlack person shill

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >actually the royal navy blockade has only made the fatherland stronger stupid frogs!!!

        check intel kaiser Z on telegraph for info entente media is trying to bury

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >intel Kaiser Z
          God I'd love seeing that shit lmao

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Vladivostok is encircled

      SOON

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Vladivostok you say?

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Speaking of losses, Oryx's team added 145 new Russian losses today, mostly old undocumented ones.
    The count as of now is 4966.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If the ukranians actually manage to blow up over 9000 russian vehicles I will make an honest to god good faith attempt to revive the meme

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Third fuel train added got damn.

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >a White House briefing says over 75,000 Russians have been KIA or WIA since the invasion started
    Happy 5 months everybody

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That number is far too low, vatnik shill.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That number is far too low, vatnik shill.

      US estimates had them at like 45-50k russian dead, which is a shit ton for so little gained. The US lost 2448 in Afghanistan and 4491 in Iraq. And that was with 20+ years of war, russia is 5 months in and is having a disastrous causality rate.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        No, that's ukr estimates
        and mind you, this doesn't include vaginers and banana separatists.
        Vaginers - about 12k
        donbabweans - about 25k

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Does that number include russian mercs like wagner and other foreign volunteers?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            No, they try to count them separately

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            here's a quote from Strelkov from 1.5 months ago btw
            >Therefore, by leaning on these fortifications they are counting on stopping and exhausting us. The Donetsk infantry is 70% gone, at least the professionals
            https://wartranslated.com/igor-girking-predicts-a-battle-for-the-initiative-10-june-2022/

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        in Afganistan, soviets lost 14k men with following equipment losses, we could try to extrapolate it with oryx list
        451 aircraft (includes 333 helicopters)
        147 tanks
        1,314 IFV/APCs
        433 artillery guns and mortars

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      check incel slave Z for the real casualty figures the western media is trying to hide

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not enough.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/2v4aphh.jpg

      No, that's ukr estimates
      and mind you, this doesn't include vaginers and banana separatists.
      Vaginers - about 12k
      donbabweans - about 25k

      I wonder if this war is actually going to match or even surpass the casualty rates of the original Crimea War (1853).

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I love when a /k/ thread pops up on the frontpage, always a good laugh to read your delusions

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      2 weeks and billions will die from the vax
      go back /misc/troon

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        what are you even trying to say kek

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          /misc/ promised me billions of dead sheeple from the vax

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >I love when a /k/ thread pops up on the frontpage, always a good laugh to read your delusions

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I mean UVZ can just pump some more out everyday, like they are doing.

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >How long can it keep this up?
    It is never just Russia.
    >"There are no upper limits to military coordination between our two countries."
    It's Russia and Red China. If they aren't cheating and selling things on the side - as the Chinese have with '70% of the world's grain reserves' - then the PRC supposedly has enough energy and raw materials for maybe half a decade of war/isolation.

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why did you quote me? I never denied that Ukraine was conscripting random men but that's not particularly out of the ordinary for a country being invaded.

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wew, Americlaps sure like to elect some of the most moronic amongst them. And we thought they couldn't get anyone dumber than Palin; boy, were we wrong ...

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Boebert is a stripper with glasses. Dumb as a rock and fueled by hate. Same goes for Greene, Gatz and all those other morons that voted AGAINST a human trafficking bill just recently.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Based, she agrees with more and more Americans. Stop wasting tax dollars on shitholes like Ukraine and Somalia. If anything, a Russian takeover of Eastern Europe would drastically reduce the amount of garbage and spam from butthurt belters polluting American sites like mosquito larvae

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Am Kevin from Ohioblast I much agree.

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    NATO why so pathetic?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      ?

      Your own lil' infographic shows R*ssia outnumbering Ukraine in every regard but long-range artillery and personnel, although of course this completely neglects LDNR forces where most of the fighting is actually taking place.

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Projection: The Post
    Guess you also recognize R*ssians' obsession with wienersucking then, huh?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      None of these ''''''sources'''''' (LMAO@the random captioned screengrab) detail conscription of, I quote, "unsuspecting citizens at gunpoint, like a South American kidnapping". Not that one would expect a R*ssian to know the difference.

      ?

      Your own lil' infographic shows R*ssia outnumbering Ukraine in every regard but long-range artillery and personnel, although of course this completely neglects LDNR forces where most of the fighting is actually taking place.

      there it is, the mind broken butthurt belter, who is too afraid to even spell the name of Russia, like a israelite writing G-D.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Hahaha, nah, vatnik, more like someone not wanting to defile themselves by taking such a filthy word in their mouth.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          More various squeaking sounds from a prey animal watching its cohorts being consumed by Russia, and knows its next on the menu

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            My sides, not even him, but you realise this is exactly why the rest of the world makes fun of you?
            The whole
            >No it's all Russophobia, we would never... etc
            >You will be next!

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Ukraine and Russia will remember they're brothers again

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You might wanna check again who's doing the consuming. Also, yes, I definitely am next on the menu. The decrepit, thoroughly corrupt shithole that is R*ssia and its piss-poor excuse of an army, which couldn't even conquer its tiny neighbor after almost half a year, is definitely gonna come after my nation next, a NATO member. Dream on, you vodka-pickled prick.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >who is doing the consuming
              ??
              Which country has lost control of territory to the other in this war? You are doing the fetal alcohol Poland style of arguing where everything is repeated back as a “no u” without even checking if it makes sense. NATO might offer protection for now, But it’s an interesting long term strategy when your country is about as important to US voters as dolphin safe tuna fishing

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Ackshually Europe and the Pacific are the only regions Americans give a shit about, based on boots on the ground.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                interesting take, since there's tens of millions of voters in the US with polish ancestry

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Which country has lost control of territory to the other in this war?
                That's like a German asking this question of a R*ssian in 1943. You're too blind to see which way the wind blows and thankfully the same is apparently true of your leadership class. R*ssia is hemorrhaging troops, equipment and money whereas Ukraine is getting bankrolled by the largest, wealthiest political bloc in human history. I wonder who's gonna be victorious in the end. The latter or Snow Nigeria with its economy the size of Italy and a population as AIDS-riddled and drug-addicted as any third world country? Not to mention its incredibly corrupt and mismanaged military. Tough call.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Why are Russian's still trying to pull this? You've been reduced to trench warfare tactics against a country you have a massive Armour and aircraft advantage over, a country which is still mostly using soviet hand-me downs. Good luck winning against the Alliance that outnumbers you with modern tanks, modern fighter jets, and modern naval vessels.

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    None of these ''''''sources'''''' (LMAO@the random captioned screengrab) detail conscription of, I quote, "unsuspecting citizens at gunpoint, like a South American kidnapping". Not that one would expect a R*ssian to know the difference.

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Zelensky lies to his western vassal about the successes of the Ukrainian army and makes a show of it. The Second Stage will end with the capture of Slavyansk and the battle for Donbass will end with the victory of the Russian army. Then the counterattack of the Ukrainian army on the Kherson-Nykolaiv direction will have a catastrophe. Russia will take Odessa and make a corridor to Pridnestrovie. The troops of the Western Military District will take Kharkov. Then, like the cherry on the cake, the Russian-Belarusian group will go to Kiev and force Zelensky to sign the surrender.

    In 2024 special agent Donald Trumpov will arrange civil war in the United States.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Then the counterattack of the Ukrainian army on the Kherson-Nykolaiv direction will have a catastrophe.
      >have a catastrophe
      Sure, Vatnik.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, everyone wil be OK for Putin once Steinerowski attacks.

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Looks like the dying Zelensky regime's increasingly desperate "recruitment" / kidnapping measures is a VERY sore spot for the frantic /k/opers

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >still zero (0) proofs of kidnappings

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Where is the actual video, you absolute dipshit? Anyone can post a non-descriptive screencap and slap on a caption with whatever they want.

          [...]
          None of these ''''''sources'''''' (LMAO@the random captioned screengrab) detail conscription of, I quote, "unsuspecting citizens at gunpoint, like a South American kidnapping". Not that one would expect a R*ssian to know the difference.

          >still refusing to link to the video

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *