Remember that time a non-nuclear state attacked a nuclear power and nothing fucking happened?

Remember that time a non-nuclear state attacked a nuclear power and nothing fucking happened?
Yeah nukes only exist on paper.

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not how deterrence works. If it was an instant "I win" button that current nuke powers could use to bully any non nuke powers into getting whatever they want, you would have total global proliferation overnight.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What’s the point of using nukes on a bunch of 16 year old conscripts when you can just send Royal Marines to slap the shit out of them and they I’ll run away?

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >nothing fucking happened?
    Besides Argentina getting its ass kicked, yeah. But I guess that's practically nothing given how much of a foregone conclusion that was when no other great power stepped in on her behalf.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >total global proliferation overnight

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >but muh nooks
    That's because the British aren't assholes.

    Nuclear weapons are for deterrence against other nuclear powers, not for killing third-worlders.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >That's because the British aren't assholes.
      The British are assholes. They have always been assholes.

      They didn't use nukes because there was no tangible benefit to doing so and would have cost them a significant amount of political capital at home and abroad.

      You might as well ask why they didn't bomb school buses in a terror campaign.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >no tangible benefit to doing so and would have cost them a significant amount of political capital at home and abroad.
        Well exactly. Which makes bongs not-arseholes. Unlike Russwana, which is doing exactly that.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >You might as well ask why they didn't bomb school buses in a terror campaign
        Because Argentina was too poor to have schools, let alone buses for them?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why use nukes when you can just as well win without them?

        >That's because the British aren't assholes.
        I mean they are, but at least they aren't nuclear assholes.

        >That's because the British aren't assholes.
        citation needed

        kek none of you defended Argentina against my calling them third-worlders

        Exactly the response I expected, too. 🙂

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Because they are third worlders? Did you think they were first or 2nd worlders? Do you even know what it means to be third world? Here is a hint. It doesn't mean poor shithole even though that is what a majority of them are.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        oooh someone is salty for being a loser.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why use nukes when you can just as well win without them?

      >That's because the British aren't assholes.
      I mean they are, but at least they aren't nuclear assholes.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >That's because the British aren't assholes.
      citation needed

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >not for killing third worlders.
      They should be though.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >why is a weapon of last resort not used as the first resort?

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Man the West cannot stop winning.

    >Armenia gets bombed from Azerbaijan
    >Russians immediately refuse to assist and tell them to fuck off.

    Conversely
    >Couple of Islands of absolutely no value get invaded
    >Uk sends a carrier and fucking fights

    West>Alles

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/7LNDEZ0.jpg

      >Why did Reagan allow the British to do whatever they want in the Americas
      1. The people living on the island didn't want to be under Argentina's rule. Go figure.
      2. S P E C I A L R E L A T I O N S H I P

      anglosphere literally too powerful

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/7LNDEZ0.jpg

        >Why did Reagan allow the British to do whatever they want in the Americas
        1. The people living on the island didn't want to be under Argentina's rule. Go figure.
        2. S P E C I A L R E L A T I O N S H I P

        >be Reagan
        >say "Yeah we're staying out of this conflict, guys! We're neutral in this!"
        >Meet up with the Brits and exchange intelligence daily while you laugh at Argies getting owned

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        [laughs in NATO]

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I hate Vatniks to but this has to be one of the cringest pictures I’ve ever seen.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >of no value
      The waters are full of oil.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That's a environmental disaster! What is happening to all the penguins, are they ok?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Why do you think they're black?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They're dressed for fancy parties?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They're being towed outside of the environment

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            into another environment?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Weren't those found after the war?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jun/14/declassified-files-reveal-british-interest-in-falkland-islands-oil
          >In 1975, an energy department official wrote: “Our ministers are very interested in the possibility of exploiting offshore oil around the Falkland Islands.”
          >Britain protested again in 1981 when Argentina auctioned more exploration licences. A Foreign Office official wrote: “We must maintain that any oil in the Falkland Islands continental shelf is British, without specifying whether we mean HMG or Falkland Islands have the right to exploit it. The important point is that it is ours not Argentine.”

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How is South America not the West? They're Catholics who speak romance languages.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why does the island belong to the British when it's so close to Argentina? Why did Reagan allow the British to do whatever they want in the Americas despite the existence of the Monroe Doctrine.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      T.Seething Argie

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nah, just legit questions.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Because they owned it for a 100 years and before then it was owned by the Spanish and French. This is like claiming Mexico should claim Puerto Rico because their close to each other and used to be controlled by Spain

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >This is like claiming Mexico should claim Puerto Rico because their close to each other and used to be controlled by Spain
            It makes sense, tbh and the US wouldn't be losing anything.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Puerto Rico wouldn't be happy about losing out on American gibs, and they've even been making noise about statehood, so it's very apt comparison right down to the locals hating it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >They've been making noise about statehood.
                No they haven't. They have rejected statehood multiple times. There are a few gays pushing for statehood and doing everything including removing "remain a territory" from public voting options.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I never said it was going to happen since it's up to Washington and not them, but you're quite flatly wrong about them rejecting it. There has been multiple referendums on the topic, with the most recent in 2020 being a quite simple
                >Should Puerto Rico be admitted immediately into the Union as a State?
                53% yes, 47% no

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rico_statehood_movement#2020_referendum

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The 2020 referendum was boycotted specifically because there was no "remain a territory" option, retard. Less than 10% turnout

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Puerto Rico population
                >3.194 million
                >votes
                >655,505 yes
                >592,671 no

                That would be 30% turnout of the entire population, not all of who're of voting age, and puts them right around the turnout rate of the US in a midterm election. You know that you're anonymous here, right? You can just stop posting, and no one will know you're retarded the next time you open your mouth unless you say something equally as stupid then.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not responding to water Hispanics sorry.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i can excuse retardedness. what i can't excuse is confident retardedness

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I never said it was going to happen since it's up to Washington and not them, but you're quite flatly wrong about them rejecting it. There has been multiple referendums on the topic, with the most recent in 2020 being a quite simple
                >Should Puerto Rico be admitted immediately into the Union as a State?
                53% yes, 47% no

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rico_statehood_movement#2020_referendum

                why doesn't Puerto Rico want to become a territory? iirc rich expats from USA messes up PR's local economy. Plus, wouldn't they get seats in Congress if they become a state? They'd still get gibs from the government since a bunch of states get federal funds.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They'd get more gibs but also pay more in taxes and have to live up to a bunch of US regulations from my vague memories, but I could be wrong. They also would have to find some way to convince the Republicans and Democrats that letting them in won't change the balance of power, or try it when the government is being run by a singular party and pander to them.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >it's so close to Argentina
      !!!!!!!!!!
      Interesting geofact:
      When Argentina first made the claim on the Falkvinas, its southern border was further away from the islands than the US is from Bermuda.
      The F belongs to A no more than Japan belongs to China.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      why does northern Argentina belongs to Argentina when it's so close to Brazil?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Why did Reagan allow the British to do whatever they want in the Americas
      1. The people living on the island didn't want to be under Argentina's rule. Go figure.
      2. S P E C I A L R E L A T I O N S H I P

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The US should have been the one to slap Argentina. The British had no reason to do a military operation in the America's and Reagan was a fucking cuck who should have been assassinated for allowing the British to operate in the Americas, showing weakness of the United States.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >The US should have been the one to slap Argentina.
          No that's weird. Why should American troops enforce an island's right to remain a British territory when Thatcher is willing to spend the cash (and buy from the US, btw) to do it herself? Weird.

          The US would step in to break it up if things got out of hand, but Britannia is a capable nation, she can take care of her own business and foot her own bill in blood and treasure.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why would the USA give a shit about one of it's foreign airstrips fucking over Argentina.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Underrated

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >it’s so close to me so therefore it belongs to me

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Why does the island belong to the British
      Because they can defend it.
      Simple as

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Argentina belongs to Chile

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The same reason for BIOT

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It doesn't belong to Argentina.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nobody was going to cause WW3 over the fucking Falklands and Britain showed it didn’t have to use them anyways from how quickly they slapped Argentina. Using nukes on Argentina would be a complete and total waste when the British goal was only securing Malvinas back and it became apparent that Argentina was in no shape for a prolonged conflict anyways.

      They were a British territory for long before all of that and specifically voted to continue being a British territory because anyone with a brain could see how much of a shithole Argentina was right from their house.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Based Exocet missiles killed lot of britcucks and destroyed more ships than argies lost.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Who controls the island right now?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Falkland Islanders, protected by British forces. (Because F'ers are Brits of course)

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So the k/d ratio isn't what decides the winner?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Didnt the Argenchuds get trounced?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yes.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Argie are you okay? Are you okay argie?

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Most US nuclear weapons would not work either way, nuclear readiness overall is fairly limited

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?519954-1/hearing-nuclear-readiness-amid-russia-ukraine-war

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      bruh.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Most US nuclear weapons would not work either way
      That's not what your link says, you dollar store glavset cock.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You know I was going to make fun of you for suggesting that the reasonable reaction to the Falklands war was to nuke Argentina into dust
    But that actually sounds like a really interesting alt-history scenario, so I'll let it slide

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The only reason the bongs did not nuke beunos nachos was that the Argies were CIA lapdogs and had to kept alive against commie neighbours.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Remember that time Hiroshima and Nagasaki existed and the USAAC was just like "nah"

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because only mongoloid savages threaten muh nooks over a territorial dispute.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The nuclear power threatened nuclear usage, genuinely considered the use and won conventionally (nullifying the need to use them)
    They also didn't call NATO in

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that Argentina won politically.
    >Argentinian and British dictators go to war over some Islands in order to win popular support
    >Argentina loses, Argentinian dictator loses popular support and is ousted, Argentinian people thrive
    >Britain wins, British dictator gains popular support and is reelected, British people suffer
    inb4 I get called brown or an Argie; I'm a white American. Thatcher kindly provided the world a public unisex bathroom in her death.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >UK
      Gdp $2.7T (6th)
      Life expectancy 81.5 years
      Minimum wage $1800 per month
      >Argentina
      Gdp $383bn (57th)
      Life expectancy 76.6 years
      Minimum wage $370 per month

      You should step outside you fucking mongoloid.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Irrelevant to losing the chains of your dictatorship vs having to live under it for longer.
        >Ohhh but THIS dictatorship had a higher GDPppp
        Then give up your guns and knives if you own any and start licking boots, fag.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Lmao get off 4chan you daft incel.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Hating tyranny and Thatcher is 4chan
            Hello tourist. Fresh off the fucking boat, it seems?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Tyranny and Th-thatcher
              >PrepHole weapons board
              Gtfo you dumb cunt

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Fighting tyranny
                >Not PrepHole
                Fuck off newfag albion

                Imagine being american and caring about a british prime minister that much

                Imagine being a Brit and caring about a United States President that much.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Continues to post 4chan tripe
                Still no signs of anything weapon related? Did Thatcher bully you personally or something? Kinda cringe your angry at a lady that's been dead for 9 years lol

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Where's the '4chan tripe,' newfag? It's clear you've never fucking browsed PrepHole before.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Thatcher
                >Muh Tyranny
                >Cringe IRA song
                Thats all 4chan bro, Thatcher was pretty based and inspired the most kino of that era not that you would know because you were too busy on ancestory DNA crying because you got 75% Mexican when you wanted Irish and German genes.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm american, but yeah it does make more sense that Brits care about who the US President is because america is more important to the average brit than britain is to the average american. They are our client state

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Pretty sure he didn't, but you have obsessed over a British one for the last few posts?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine being american and caring about a british prime minister that much

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why should the bongs use nukes?
    The Argie junta fell for the classic
    >a quick successful war will fix all our internal issuess

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Nuking a county you could btfo with just your Navy in a few weeks
    Why would you do that?

Your email address will not be published.