Remember that two hundred year period where we had sheriffs and deputies instead of cops and everyone was strapped 24/7 but we also had exponentially less violent crime?
Less crime? My brother in allah there were gangs of bandits and cannibals in the hills. The frontier was where you got capped for looking at a guy wrong and people hunted you just for your scalp
t. didn't grow up in farm country
the hatfields and mccoys isn't just a story, some motherfuckers will create generational blood feuds simply because they can't control their family or themselves
>watched no country for old men on loop >allah, oh k buddy go find a 7yr while you're at it Kashmir
either ARAB that fantasizes over american western/horror im guessing.
while all the >gangs of bandits and cannibals in the hills. The frontier was where you got capped for looking at a guy wrong and people hunted you just for your scalp
are at LAS
The only places that applied to was in Northern Mexico where they had a large nomadic native population coupled with a central government that was busy with over a century of constant civil war to help. The US pacified its "wild" west incredibly early. Also i'm assuming you got that retarded take from the wendigoon vid and totally tuned out where the vid is on a book a year AFTER a major war in a freshly annexed area and the crazy shit was not even in America. That'd be like using the chaos following Mao's civil war victory as the bench line of all of Chinas modern history and living conditions
>stupid cartoon reaction image with an iPhone name >retarded take with no basis in reality
Yea, a cannibal in the hills that ate one dude a year is indeed the same crime rate as thousands of moron murders every year just in blue shitholes that have banned guns.
My child of Zeus don't believe that Bones Tomahawk was the norm. Usually, the simple fact that bounty hunter existed and was more or less anyone was enough to reduce the problem of bandits and indian cannibals to dust pretty quick.
The real thing that was a gamechanger was that you could choose to arrest a criminal or killing him. 90% of the time, killing was more simple.
>everyone was strapped 24/7
This is a meme that really needs to die. Most cities or states had extremely restrictive laws about carrying firearms. Today's laws are much better for CCW, but worse for owning stuff in your house (which laws didn't used to care about much.)
yeah and you know what? my trash cans will stay undisturbed and my commute to work will be short. also if i want to go to the store or a restaurant, they're all 5 minutes away.
Yep, north of Milwaukee but I'm situated between two cornfields, a horse farm, and some local manufacturers. I get to have my cake and eat it too. Also golf courses, and the taxes are a bit high with makework municipal projects, but I think that's the price of holding the line against Milwaukee riff-raff moving into a home near you (morons).
>Levels of violence there were considered unacceptably high by contemporaries: in the 1340s, the homicide rate was around 110 per 100,000. (In the UK in 2011, it was 1 per 100,000.)
gay
>the homicide rate was around 110 per 100,000
Even El Salvador, which has the highest murder rate in the world, has about half that according to most sources I'm seeing. 110 per 100k is absolutely ridiculous.
So basically 0.1% of people are murdered, if I am getting it right. 1000 being 1%, 100 being 0.1%. That doesn't feel like a lot but if you imagine a college class of 100 people and you had a 1% chance to get fucking murdered it's pretty nasty. Basically guarantees you know someone who got murdered or you know someone who knows someone who got murdered.
>the homicide rate was around 110 per 100,000
Even El Salvador, which has the highest murder rate in the world, has about half that according to most sources I'm seeing. 110 per 100k is absolutely ridiculous.
Shit, I didn't mean to post that image. I initially thought you said South Africa when I first replied.
Oh wow, I think I'm a bit too tired right now. Mixing up South America and South Africa wasn't the only thing I misread.
>two hundred year period where we had sheriffs and deputies instead of cops and everyone was strapped 24/7 but we also had exponentially less violent crime >Murder rates in the Middle Ages >Middle Ages >In the US during westward expansion
This is the safest, most stable time to be alive. >muh unrest
Did anything actually happen to any of you gays other than having to wait in line for toilet paper and sit inside your homes for 2 weeks? It was fucking nothing. The doomsayers were wrong. The doomsayers are always wrong.
Less crime? My brother in allah there were gangs of bandits and cannibals in the hills. The frontier was where you got capped for looking at a guy wrong and people hunted you just for your scalp
[...]
[...]
[...]
I bet you fags will also rail against "historical revisionism" while using it without hesitation as long as it's politically convenient.
Is it just retard hour now? How much of a larper are you to believe the wild west was better?
t. 'rural' anon who lives 25 minutes from a major city
>strawmanning this hard
Someone's butthurt. Post proof of your situation. Bet you don't even have a wife, you're just imagining problems up ahead to cope with your inceldom.
The most violent towns of the "wild west" were less violent per capita than any US city today. Post your guns or get the fuck out.
I don't have any guns. You can have an old picture of my cat. Also it probably makes more sense to compare frontier settlements (low crime) to modern rural areas (basically no crime)
>Also it probably makes more sense to compare frontier settlements (low crime) to modern rural areas (basically no crime)
Not if people say the "Wild West" was too violent with one hand and that modern cities are acceptable with the other.
Yeah, I'm not saying that. I'm saying that if we are comparing crime rates between time periods it's all or nothing and we should either compare regions with similar population densities or not.
I don't have any guns. You can have an old picture of my cat. Also it probably makes more sense to compare frontier settlements (low crime) to modern rural areas (basically no crime)
Gee almost as if the problem was guns, not black people like
https://i.imgur.com/mFV45fz.png
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
The most violent towns of the "wild west" were less violent per capita than any US city today. Post your guns or get the fuck out.
pretends, you imbecile
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
You need to go back.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
The rate of bridge suicides are orders of magnitude higher in locations with tall bridges than in ones without them. Is the problem then with the bridges?
Another picture of my cat. That's definitely not my gun though
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Oopsies. And before you ask, yes. I did read the manual.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>The rate of bridge suicides are orders of magnitude higher in locations with tall bridges than in ones without them
Interstingly not, it's actually correlated with red states
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Explain to me how your graphic demonstrates that proximity to a tall bridge has less predictive power than living in a red state for bridge related suicides.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>13% percent of the population >Somehow dies to guns more than 50% of the population across the board
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
sir this is the gun+ board
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Tell that to
https://i.imgur.com/mFV45fz.png
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
The most violent towns of the "wild west" were less violent per capita than any US city today. Post your guns or get the fuck out.
and his weird ass axis scaling
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Let me school you a bit brother. Fitting a strait line on a logarithmic axis is no different than fitting a logarithmic curve on a linear axis, and actually is a legacy technique for determining relationships from the days before computers and numerical analysis.
What this graph implies is that there is a sigmoidal relationship between 0% black, a flat line at the bottom, and 100% black. As soon as you introduce black people into a society, crime explodes until it plateaus at a rate that 100% black societies typically see. Seeing as the fit is quite good compared to other fits you might see while dabbling in the softer sciences, that implies a causality. Of course, more research would be necessary before you could make such a definitive statement.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
https://i.imgur.com/mFV45fz.png
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
The most violent towns of the "wild west" were less violent per capita than any US city today. Post your guns or get the fuck out.
didnt even fix the whole thing, it was so dumb. it jumps from 20 to fucking 40 in the last fucking fraction of that chart just to keep that line up
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
What the fuck am I looking at?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
It's called log scaling.
Attached is a linear scale. Notice the straight line.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
https://i.imgur.com/bDH4NXv.png
Now an exponential scale. Notice the upward curve because of the positive integer.
https://i.imgur.com/1ALeGig.png
And now the logarithmic scale. When looking at a log curve it is often helpful to scale the graph in such a way that the line becomes straight.
There's nothing wrong with the scaling, you just don't like the conclusion.
oh fuck off, ya wanker. the original graph's axes are about as regular as a septuagenarian with IBS
the distances aren't regular and neither is the numbering
I know you chucklefucks hate facts, but this is ludicrous
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
No gun no opinion fag
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>the original graph's axes are about as regular as...
Except it's a log plot and you just don't understand basic math. The distance between the hash marks goes down at a consistent RATE. If you paid attention in math class you might understand what is going on here. The facts are that black people in this country commit crime at a disproportionate rate and gun ownership is not correlated with higher crime. In the other post you made claiming that "red" states have higher crime all of those states are in the south, where there is a higher percentage of black people to other ethnic groups, or have very low populations, making their rates for everything very sensitive. Montana, Wyoming, and Alaska all have populations below 1M so any pertubation will have a significant impact on the rate. If a community of 10 people go 99 years with zero murders then have a single year with 1 murder, they will have a murder rate of 100 per 100,000 over that century. 100 people aren't being murdered each year, and it's not a violent community, it's just very small.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>The distance between the hash marks goes down at a consistent RATE
the fucking hell they do
shove your per-capita cope up your ass too
if you shove 9 million motherfuckers literally on top each other and some bumpkin ass motherfuckers that live minutes to miles from one another are still killing each other faster, that's fucked up, friendo.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
You have obviously never taken a calculus class in your life.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
An example of log graph paper. You are wrong. Accept it.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Now an exponential scale. Notice the upward curve because of the positive integer.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>anon reveals he's a dumb motherfucker
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
And now the logarithmic scale. When looking at a log curve it is often helpful to scale the graph in such a way that the line becomes straight.
There's nothing wrong with the scaling, you just don't like the conclusion.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
I can't imagine a funnier way of revealing you're fucking retarded than this kekw
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Be nice, he is clearly legitimately retarded.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>logarithmic
that graph is about as logarithmic as a bears ass is hairless.
the graph is an indefensible lie
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>suicide rate is higher due to illness issues across the nation >people with guns use the easy way out if they fall into the above category
fuck off, even if that is bait.
Gee almost as if the problem was guns, not black people like [...] pretends, you imbecile
Tell that to [...] and his weird ass axis scaling
https://i.imgur.com/in0kAGe.png
>The rate of bridge suicides are orders of magnitude higher in locations with tall bridges than in ones without them
Interstingly not, it's actually correlated with red states
You really are paid to be here, get with the times, no one gives a fuck about party politics, stay away from me and my property while i make enough money to avoid you sub 90 iq fags.
it's mostly about wealth as he pointed out
well behaved and educated old money will obviously have less violent crime than hillbilly white trash and most moroned cities
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
The black upper 30% commit crime at or exceeding the rate of the white lower 30% of income.
Tell me about Vermont, what make them the best state? They seem like progressives yet are whites and have guns and they seem to want to keep both of these.
>very nice 5 months a year >looks like Russia 7 months a year >liberals everywhere >our "republican" governor is more liberal than some actual democrats >very high COL >very nice land >past 5 years have an insane amount of traffic on road compared to the past 30 years >terrible economy >terrible roads >you can buy weed with just a drivers license
We had more reliable record keeping back then than we do today since we had competent and intelligent people in charge of it, rather than brainlet dysgenic freaks like you.
>I agree that it had less crime because of the lack of morons, but it wasn't like it was paradise.
Why does every fag who hears an objectively correct fact have to "temper" it by responding to something that the fact didn't say?
>9mm is too weak >we need 10mm >our college grad and femoids cant deal with 10mm recoila >we make it a weaker 10mm calles 40sw >its almost identical to 9mm in terminal ballistics >we go back to 9mm
yeah.
>biggest police shootout maybe ever >created massive changes to police departments across the nation >no cops or bystanders were killed
why did anyone give a shit again?
The North Hollywood bank robbery. The cops didn't have any weapons that could penetrate body armor and they were borrowing rifles from local gun stores while it was going on.
>9mm is too weak >we need 10mm >our college grad and femoids cant deal with 10mm recoila >we make it a weaker 10mm calles 40sw >its almost identical to 9mm in terminal ballistics >we go back to 9mm
yeah.
>The North Hollywood bank robbery. The cops didn't have any weapons that could penetrate body armor and they were borrowing rifles from local gun stores while it was going on.
Let's be honest, the real problem was that the cops were 67-117 yards away and couldn't even get rounds on target. Both robbers would have went down quite quickly if the cops could actually get rounds on target even if they couldn't penetrate the robber's armor. No armor is going to save you if you're standing out in the open taking fire from someone who can at least reliably put shots somewhere on your body.
The militarization of the Police was already happening for a while. The people telling you it was the North Hollywood shootout are missing the larger context of what was happening in large cities across the United States and what was beginning to happen in rural Southern Border regions.
The North Hollywood shootout was a big deal for two main reasons: It happened in Hollywood and was televised live as it happened nationwide, and it was only a year removed from the '92 LA Riots - which were also televised nationally. So a lot of people who never had to think about what the Police had to face at the time got front row seat to the "What Happens When you Give an Immigrant and a Retard a Gun" show. A show that had been playing a lot more in larger metropolitan areas for over a decade but no one cared about. After the Hollywood Shootout and seeing the National Guard have to be called in because they had the firepower to deal with the '92 riots, people had to think about how cops do their jobs more and the tools that they are given to accomplish that compared to what a criminal could use with less effort.
Further compounding this was Police forces in the Southern border states were starting to run into serious issues in combating drug traffickers who had essentially an unlimited budget and had no rules of engagement. In most occasions unless the SWAT guys or a SWAT equivalent were the ones engaging a cartel, the average Sherrif or State Trooper would be outgunned and out matched. The Federal government was not immune to this either mind you. Compare the resources of the DEA in 1980 who were stopping boats occasionally and performing raids with local departments, to 1995 when they were hunting Escobar using AWACs and satellites.
Just like the Military, domestic law enforcement needed to meet or exceed their opposition and the US already had the world's greatest industrial complex so why not ask it to lend its resources to the Homefront.
>militarization of the Police
It's more accurate to say the modernization of the police IMO. The police were already intensely militarized. They wore military uniforms (see your pic? it's military.) and used shoot-first tactics. Old school police had no qualms laying lethal ambushes, beating people up at the drop of a hat and had the legal right to shoot anyone who ran for a long time - until a late 1970s supreme court case IIRC.
Their weapons used to be military grade to. But time moved on and the cops' arsenals didn't, so eventually things got to a point where they needed an update.
>work 9 to 5 >come home >wife pissed about something dont recall what >toddler busy practicing fortnite dances infront of mirror. no idea where the kid picked it up. Cant be bothered to care. >down a bottle of the cheap ass winking owl from aldi followed by a six pack of bud light >only thing left to do is post retarded slide on PrepHole until 2am. >go to bed >wife sighs and rolls overa
Life is good. Post some more from the phone.
>work only when I feel like it >always home >wife dead >Kids grown and off somewhere not doing a fucking thing Mom and Dad recommended like oh, say, college >down a bottle of homemade cider followed by a six pack of Sierra Nevada >only thing left to do is masturbate and browse 4chins >go to bed >wife rolls over in her grave >Tomorrow I get picrel out of jail >Life is good at least what's left of it
>strawmanning this hard
Someone's butthurt. Post proof of your situation. Bet you don't even have a wife, you're just imagining problems up ahead to cope with your inceldom.
sheriff in my county has both. They have their handgun on them always, 12 gauge pump and a AR pattern rifle in the center rack of the car.
Live in Cali by the way, in a lib area
I love anonymous posting but it sucks when there's a love triangle argument going on
I think things are safer now than they were, but I also think that guns are cool and I don't particularly care how many people are shooting each other with them. I want to also add that comparing gun deaths is stupid without looking at overall homicide rates. No shit people are shooting and killing each other and themselves when they have access to guns. It's easy. That is the point. But is restricting access to firearms actually reducing overall homicide and suicide rates? That is the more important question. Not that I personally care what the answer is because I am willing to sacrifice every single one of you in order to keep punching holes in paper at distance.
>Not that I personally care what the answer is because I am willing to sacrifice every single one of you in order to keep punching holes in paper at distance
100x this
Or be licensed weapons users, or be primarily interested in military weapons, or whatever. Stop pretending PrepHole is exclusively for right wing American wiggers, it never was.
I'm not pretending that, I'm a right-wing Canadian. But if you think that >gun-free society is something to brag about
then you're a gay and you're going to be made fun of on the weapons board, might as well get used to it.
>Rember back in the days > shotguns
Through the use of magic mushrooms in my youth
I have remembered many of my past lives
and the deaths. I have been clubbed. speared
with flint tips, hacked by bronze swords and one
of my last deaths.... By shotgun. see pic.
But By Far, The worst death was by a giant
cave bear... Eaten alive and Shitted off a cliff.
i've watched hundreds of police shootings and body armor is basically a non-issue. people love to hype it up because the idea that there's invincible iron man criminals running around that cannot be killed is really scary
being a cowboy was like being a fruit picker, it was a shi, lowly job that people hired literally anyone for. it was the most ethnically diverse job you could find in the west, full of chinese and blacks and yadda yadda. some cool movies, sure, but those were just movies being romantic about it.
its like the "the women behind the moon landing" whatever movie. yes, rooms full of people doing the bitch work for the real mathematicians existed. it was grunt work, they chose black people because they could...pay them less. the movie hilariously missed how shitty of a situation it really was.
I saw one in one of those videos of people doing 150+ on the interstate. Guy’s shifter stopped working so he pulled over and a motorcycle cop stopped to check on him and didn’t notice or mention him not having a plate lol
Cops here have both. If they are on the SWAT team, they might have extra in the truck, something like an MP5 unironically. Also one of the reasons shotguns were so prolific for police, is that the average American kid probably grew up with shotguns in some capacity. Whereas rifles was much more a toss up. There was a time though where a good percentage of 12 year old American boys was already proficient with a shotgun. Also ARs have just become so accessible, cheap, versatile, commonplace, etc, that there's almost no reason not to.
Differences is wealth where smaller. It'll be harder and harder to keep system as US one stable over time and we'll se cops being more and more militarized.
I predict in 30 years cops will drive around in fully armored vehicles, wear full body armor and full auto rifles.
I don't give a fuck what your gay basedboy youtuber liberals say bruh west was wild end of story. Go cry about it to the twitter mafia if you don't like it snowflake.
This channel and the very real history it discusses single handily blows the fuck out of of all you gay revisionists that claim the west was never wild
Looking through the videos it appears to be almost entirely about Indian wars. Comanche, Apache, Cheyenne, Blackfoot, etc. attacking, enslaving, and killing settlers. When gun control advocates say the west was wild they mean that a well armed population was driven mad by the guns in their presence and committed crimes at a greater rate than settled people in the eastern US, and that just isn't true.
If you want to know the real history of gun control in the old west the best example is probably the Wounded Knee Massacre. On December 29, 1890 the US Army 7th Cav tracked down a group of a little over 300 hungry Lakota at Wounded Knee. The soldiers confiscated all of the rifles the Lakota had, then started shooting into the camp. By the end of the "battle" over 300 innocent Lakota were dead, murdered by agents of the state.
I get what you're saying about contemporary political takes on the wild west. But my point is that, gun crimes, or no, it was an incredibly violent and wild place/time in history and whitewashing it as this kumbaya fairytale land is disingenuous and disrespectful to the decedents of the settlers and especially the natives that fought them.
nah, its less violent than anywhere blacks lived in the 70s, 80s, or now. Because the majority of black males in the usa do murder, rape and cannibalism
If it's comparable to the more dangerous cities today then it was pretty wild as a resident of Birmingham Alabama that regularly, and occasionally contributes to, hearing gunshots
When I was a cop (93-03) I was psyched I got selected to be one of the two guys on my squad with a shotgun. Plain Jane 14” 870, wood furniture, bead sight. I remember being on post during the DC sniper and thinking how nice a rifle would be if I’m watching a wood line at 100M+. When I went to a fed agency, we still only had shotguns and select guys who had MP5’s.
for historical context, this is why the fbi tried to adopt 10mm. take a look at how many "lethal" hits matix and platt took and kept fighting. not even on any drugs.
Remember that two hundred year period where we had sheriffs and deputies instead of cops and everyone was strapped 24/7 but we also had exponentially less violent crime?
That's more to do with we had way less minorities to cause havoc
>morons suck to live near
fixed that for you dude.
I'm pretty sure almost everyone that was not an American Indian was an immigrant minority at the time, Anon.
Less crime? My brother in allah there were gangs of bandits and cannibals in the hills. The frontier was where you got capped for looking at a guy wrong and people hunted you just for your scalp
retard take
LMAO
>durr thats why they called it the wild west!
fuck off tourist
You believe too many movies.
t. didn't grow up in farm country
the hatfields and mccoys isn't just a story, some motherfuckers will create generational blood feuds simply because they can't control their family or themselves
bro that's just your average scots-irish
In the western US all feuds can be traced to water rights.
based red dead redemption enjoyer
I bet you fags will also rail against "historical revisionism" while using it without hesitation as long as it's politically convenient.
I didnt rail against anything. The only thing I rail is your mom, gf, bf, wife and husband. Gg no re mr serious.
Surely not at the same time?
>I didnt rail against anything. The only thing I rail is your mom, gf, bf, wife and husband. Gg no re mr serious.
What
in odins name please shut the fuck fuck up
also im stealing that pic
fuck islam and its barbaric people
>watched no country for old men on loop
>allah, oh k buddy go find a 7yr while you're at it Kashmir
either ARAB that fantasizes over american western/horror im guessing.
while all the
>gangs of bandits and cannibals in the hills. The frontier was where you got capped for looking at a guy wrong and people hunted you just for your scalp
are at LAS
the wild west was literally less violent than any given major city in the USA in the 1970s
this
The only places that applied to was in Northern Mexico where they had a large nomadic native population coupled with a central government that was busy with over a century of constant civil war to help. The US pacified its "wild" west incredibly early. Also i'm assuming you got that retarded take from the wendigoon vid and totally tuned out where the vid is on a book a year AFTER a major war in a freshly annexed area and the crazy shit was not even in America. That'd be like using the chaos following Mao's civil war victory as the bench line of all of Chinas modern history and living conditions
>stupid cartoon reaction image with an iPhone name
>retarded take with no basis in reality
Yea, a cannibal in the hills that ate one dude a year is indeed the same crime rate as thousands of moron murders every year just in blue shitholes that have banned guns.
T. Retard that got all of his knowledge of the past from red dead redemption
My child of Zeus don't believe that Bones Tomahawk was the norm. Usually, the simple fact that bounty hunter existed and was more or less anyone was enough to reduce the problem of bandits and indian cannibals to dust pretty quick.
The real thing that was a gamechanger was that you could choose to arrest a criminal or killing him. 90% of the time, killing was more simple.
Yeah and then we made one terrible mistake.
letting women vote?
two terrible mistakes.
remember everything before 1865 and how much better it was
>everyone was strapped 24/7
This is a meme that really needs to die. Most cities or states had extremely restrictive laws about carrying firearms. Today's laws are much better for CCW, but worse for owning stuff in your house (which laws didn't used to care about much.)
Cities are for gays.
t. 'rural' anon who lives 25 minutes from a major city
Say what you will, but when you go to sleep tonight, it will be within 80 feet of 8 other households.
yeah and you know what? my trash cans will stay undisturbed and my commute to work will be short. also if i want to go to the store or a restaurant, they're all 5 minutes away.
Holy cope
The nearest major city to me is 2 and half hours away.
I like it that way, too.
WY or AK
Most of the US.
Post backyard
yeah, ok
you dont actually live in america, do you?
Yes I do in south america
thats a different fucking continent you make me wish i was a dog and the atf was invading my house
>brown
opinion discarded
Yep, north of Milwaukee but I'm situated between two cornfields, a horse farm, and some local manufacturers. I get to have my cake and eat it too. Also golf courses, and the taxes are a bit high with makework municipal projects, but I think that's the price of holding the line against Milwaukee riff-raff moving into a home near you (morons).
>Most cities or states had extremely restrictive laws about carrying firearms.
They actually didn't, especially not for open carry
>exponentially less violent crime?
Murder rates in the Middle Ages exceeded that of South America on a good day...
and that's why we strong af, boy
>Levels of violence there were considered unacceptably high by contemporaries: in the 1340s, the homicide rate was around 110 per 100,000. (In the UK in 2011, it was 1 per 100,000.)
gay
>the homicide rate was around 110 per 100,000
Even El Salvador, which has the highest murder rate in the world, has about half that according to most sources I'm seeing. 110 per 100k is absolutely ridiculous.
Shit, I didn't mean to post that image. I initially thought you said South Africa when I first replied.
So basically 0.1% of people are murdered, if I am getting it right. 1000 being 1%, 100 being 0.1%. That doesn't feel like a lot but if you imagine a college class of 100 people and you had a 1% chance to get fucking murdered it's pretty nasty. Basically guarantees you know someone who got murdered or you know someone who knows someone who got murdered.
They relaxed
>source
>"Expert" or "academic"
so the people who actually know?
Oh wow, I think I'm a bit too tired right now. Mixing up South America and South Africa wasn't the only thing I misread.
>two hundred year period where we had sheriffs and deputies instead of cops and everyone was strapped 24/7 but we also had exponentially less violent crime
>Murder rates in the Middle Ages
>Middle Ages
>In the US during westward expansion
This is the safest, most stable time to be alive.
>muh unrest
Did anything actually happen to any of you gays other than having to wait in line for toilet paper and sit inside your homes for 2 weeks? It was fucking nothing. The doomsayers were wrong. The doomsayers are always wrong.
>Did anything actually happen
hes one of those guys who still thinks BLM riots are happening and half the country was burned down.
T.
The most violent towns of the "wild west" were less violent per capita than any US city today. Post your guns or get the fuck out.
I don't have any guns. You can have an old picture of my cat. Also it probably makes more sense to compare frontier settlements (low crime) to modern rural areas (basically no crime)
>Also it probably makes more sense to compare frontier settlements (low crime) to modern rural areas (basically no crime)
Not if people say the "Wild West" was too violent with one hand and that modern cities are acceptable with the other.
Yeah, I'm not saying that. I'm saying that if we are comparing crime rates between time periods it's all or nothing and we should either compare regions with similar population densities or not.
Modern cities are tame as fuck. You're just an utter fucking pussy
>Enters thread
That is a fucking ugly ass cat...
>Refuses to elaborate
>Leaves
Shut up,
is a fucking cute cat
hey don't make fun of another's cat
Wanna see my pussy?
That's a nice pussy anon.
the fuck is that axis scaling, how can you talk about correlation with that shit
>murrican education
That's a noguns euro he admitted as much.
because everything still clusters around a line going up, dipshit.
You gotta be very brave now
>states with higher rates of gun ownership have more people killing themselves with guns
Brilliant observation.
Gee almost as if the problem was guns, not black people like
pretends, you imbecile
You need to go back.
The rate of bridge suicides are orders of magnitude higher in locations with tall bridges than in ones without them. Is the problem then with the bridges?
Another picture of my cat. That's definitely not my gun though
Oopsies. And before you ask, yes. I did read the manual.
>The rate of bridge suicides are orders of magnitude higher in locations with tall bridges than in ones without them
Interstingly not, it's actually correlated with red states
Explain to me how your graphic demonstrates that proximity to a tall bridge has less predictive power than living in a red state for bridge related suicides.
>13% percent of the population
>Somehow dies to guns more than 50% of the population across the board
sir this is the gun+ board
Tell that to
and his weird ass axis scaling
Let me school you a bit brother. Fitting a strait line on a logarithmic axis is no different than fitting a logarithmic curve on a linear axis, and actually is a legacy technique for determining relationships from the days before computers and numerical analysis.
What this graph implies is that there is a sigmoidal relationship between 0% black, a flat line at the bottom, and 100% black. As soon as you introduce black people into a society, crime explodes until it plateaus at a rate that 100% black societies typically see. Seeing as the fit is quite good compared to other fits you might see while dabbling in the softer sciences, that implies a causality. Of course, more research would be necessary before you could make such a definitive statement.
didnt even fix the whole thing, it was so dumb. it jumps from 20 to fucking 40 in the last fucking fraction of that chart just to keep that line up
What the fuck am I looking at?
It's called log scaling.
Attached is a linear scale. Notice the straight line.
oh fuck off, ya wanker. the original graph's axes are about as regular as a septuagenarian with IBS
the distances aren't regular and neither is the numbering
I know you chucklefucks hate facts, but this is ludicrous
No gun no opinion fag
>the original graph's axes are about as regular as...
Except it's a log plot and you just don't understand basic math. The distance between the hash marks goes down at a consistent RATE. If you paid attention in math class you might understand what is going on here. The facts are that black people in this country commit crime at a disproportionate rate and gun ownership is not correlated with higher crime. In the other post you made claiming that "red" states have higher crime all of those states are in the south, where there is a higher percentage of black people to other ethnic groups, or have very low populations, making their rates for everything very sensitive. Montana, Wyoming, and Alaska all have populations below 1M so any pertubation will have a significant impact on the rate. If a community of 10 people go 99 years with zero murders then have a single year with 1 murder, they will have a murder rate of 100 per 100,000 over that century. 100 people aren't being murdered each year, and it's not a violent community, it's just very small.
>The distance between the hash marks goes down at a consistent RATE
the fucking hell they do
shove your per-capita cope up your ass too
if you shove 9 million motherfuckers literally on top each other and some bumpkin ass motherfuckers that live minutes to miles from one another are still killing each other faster, that's fucked up, friendo.
You have obviously never taken a calculus class in your life.
An example of log graph paper. You are wrong. Accept it.
Now an exponential scale. Notice the upward curve because of the positive integer.
>anon reveals he's a dumb motherfucker
And now the logarithmic scale. When looking at a log curve it is often helpful to scale the graph in such a way that the line becomes straight.
There's nothing wrong with the scaling, you just don't like the conclusion.
I can't imagine a funnier way of revealing you're fucking retarded than this kekw
Be nice, he is clearly legitimately retarded.
>logarithmic
that graph is about as logarithmic as a bears ass is hairless.
the graph is an indefensible lie
>suicide rate is higher due to illness issues across the nation
>people with guns use the easy way out if they fall into the above category
fuck off, even if that is bait.
No gun no opinion lol.
You really are paid to be here, get with the times, no one gives a fuck about party politics, stay away from me and my property while i make enough money to avoid you sub 90 iq fags.
Now do all murders/violent crimes per state
I wonder if there's another factor that correlates better...
West Virginia has more than double the crime rate and is only barely beaten by Maine in the least diversity.
it's mostly about wealth as he pointed out
well behaved and educated old money will obviously have less violent crime than hillbilly white trash and most moroned cities
The black upper 30% commit crime at or exceeding the rate of the white lower 30% of income.
Democrat crime cities in republican states
now break it down by cities
Tell me about Vermont, what make them the best state? They seem like progressives yet are whites and have guns and they seem to want to keep both of these.
>very nice 5 months a year
>looks like Russia 7 months a year
>liberals everywhere
>our "republican" governor is more liberal than some actual democrats
>very high COL
>very nice land
>past 5 years have an insane amount of traffic on road compared to the past 30 years
>terrible economy
>terrible roads
>you can buy weed with just a drivers license
that's cause the sheriff would take your guns when you came into town, lmao
>Citing Wikipedia
No gun no opinion LOL
Fuck off fags, this raid has gone on long enough.
no actually I wasn't born yet
hes a vampire cowboy
>but we also had exponentially less violent crime?
>if we don't record it, it never happened
Brainlet hours tonight
We had more reliable record keeping back then than we do today since we had competent and intelligent people in charge of it, rather than brainlet dysgenic freaks like you.
When you say "strapped" you are talking about these things, right? Go commit a mass shooting with a flintlock, I'll wait.
You know the former prime minister of Japan was just killed with a home make muzzle loading scattergun right?
Also post gun.
Just go strapped like black beard
A pirate with a keg full of black powder could unironically do more damage than any mass shooter in history.
>Go commit a mass shooting with a flintlock, I'll wait.
Already happened
>https://yewtu.be/watch?v=LORVfnFtcH0
Really tho the government's weapons have changed too, ours aren't even on par because we've already accepted cucking laws.
>we also had exponentially less violent crime
we did not. bear in mind that before the 1920s-30s crime reporting rates were much lower, too.
Your graph literally shows the opposite, gay.
No gun no opinion.
What happened in the 60s/70s to cause the spike?
Start of heroin epidemic for 70s, and all that diversity and racial unrest in late 60s.
Everything possible.
%3D
%3D
%3D
%3D%3D
%3D%3D
The civil rights movement. I'm not even memeing.
Drug epidemics, cultural undermining disguised as "free love," MK ULTRA, uppity minorities, etc. It was a good time to be a serial killer though
they let morons into the cities
Statistically we are safer today and with less crime than we were a hundred years ago anon.
And then SOMETHING HAPPENED in the 1960s
Non-lard here. What is it about mentioned act?
Post gun or go back where you came from.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Old_West_gangs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Old_West_gunfighters
I agree that it had less crime because of the lack of morons, but it wasn't like it was paradise.
>I agree that it had less crime because of the lack of morons, but it wasn't like it was paradise.
Why does every fag who hears an objectively correct fact have to "temper" it by responding to something that the fact didn't say?
You do realize that Sheriffs and Sheriff's deputies exist today also. Fucking moronoid
t. Sheriff's Deputy
Retard, learn what the word "instead" means.
Cops are the only thing keeping most morons alive you dumb gay.
1964 immigration act
you mean back when we kept morons in chains and didnt allow non whites into the country?
The only mistake was buying the blacks from ~~*(merchants*~~) to begin with.That was never going to end well.
>everyone was strapped 24/7
>everyone
Hah.
Man this post really exposed how many commie gays are raiding PrepHole right now.
>used to have shotguns
they still do in many municipalities
better times. return to tradition. crown vics and an 870
What's the reason for the shift? Easy access to body armor?
The Hollywood shootout was a big determining factor because of the time it took to actually deal with the robbers
>9mm is too weak
>we need 10mm
>our college grad and femoids cant deal with 10mm recoila
>we make it a weaker 10mm calles 40sw
>its almost identical to 9mm in terminal ballistics
>we go back to 9mm
yeah.
>biggest police shootout maybe ever
>created massive changes to police departments across the nation
>no cops or bystanders were killed
why did anyone give a shit again?
easier to shoot a rifle
Well would you rather have a shootout with an armed criminal with a pump action shotgun or a semi automatic rifle?
The North Hollywood bank robbery. The cops didn't have any weapons that could penetrate body armor and they were borrowing rifles from local gun stores while it was going on.
Wrong shootout friendo.
>The North Hollywood bank robbery. The cops didn't have any weapons that could penetrate body armor and they were borrowing rifles from local gun stores while it was going on.
Let's be honest, the real problem was that the cops were 67-117 yards away and couldn't even get rounds on target. Both robbers would have went down quite quickly if the cops could actually get rounds on target even if they couldn't penetrate the robber's armor. No armor is going to save you if you're standing out in the open taking fire from someone who can at least reliably put shots somewhere on your body.
Yes sorry that was the south bollyeood shootout
north hollywood
Need to have excuse for more funding/gibs/toys
The militarization of the Police was already happening for a while. The people telling you it was the North Hollywood shootout are missing the larger context of what was happening in large cities across the United States and what was beginning to happen in rural Southern Border regions.
The North Hollywood shootout was a big deal for two main reasons: It happened in Hollywood and was televised live as it happened nationwide, and it was only a year removed from the '92 LA Riots - which were also televised nationally. So a lot of people who never had to think about what the Police had to face at the time got front row seat to the "What Happens When you Give an Immigrant and a Retard a Gun" show. A show that had been playing a lot more in larger metropolitan areas for over a decade but no one cared about. After the Hollywood Shootout and seeing the National Guard have to be called in because they had the firepower to deal with the '92 riots, people had to think about how cops do their jobs more and the tools that they are given to accomplish that compared to what a criminal could use with less effort.
Further compounding this was Police forces in the Southern border states were starting to run into serious issues in combating drug traffickers who had essentially an unlimited budget and had no rules of engagement. In most occasions unless the SWAT guys or a SWAT equivalent were the ones engaging a cartel, the average Sherrif or State Trooper would be outgunned and out matched. The Federal government was not immune to this either mind you. Compare the resources of the DEA in 1980 who were stopping boats occasionally and performing raids with local departments, to 1995 when they were hunting Escobar using AWACs and satellites.
Just like the Military, domestic law enforcement needed to meet or exceed their opposition and the US already had the world's greatest industrial complex so why not ask it to lend its resources to the Homefront.
>militarization of the Police
It's more accurate to say the modernization of the police IMO. The police were already intensely militarized. They wore military uniforms (see your pic? it's military.) and used shoot-first tactics. Old school police had no qualms laying lethal ambushes, beating people up at the drop of a hat and had the legal right to shoot anyone who ran for a long time - until a late 1970s supreme court case IIRC.
Their weapons used to be military grade to. But time moved on and the cops' arsenals didn't, so eventually things got to a point where they needed an update.
They still do. Shotty gives so many options. Ideally you have both.
Is it just retard hour now? How much of a larper are you to believe the wild west was better?
>work 9 to 5
>come home
>wife pissed about something dont recall what
>toddler busy practicing fortnite dances infront of mirror. no idea where the kid picked it up. Cant be bothered to care.
>down a bottle of the cheap ass winking owl from aldi followed by a six pack of bud light
>only thing left to do is post retarded slide on PrepHole until 2am.
>go to bed
>wife sighs and rolls overa
Life is good. Post some more from the phone.
least alcoholic gen x-er
I too work a 9 to 5. Granted I usually for every 2 weeks drink 2 PBR tall boys once a night for about 3-4 days.
we understand each other friend. may you be a happy alcoholic with dilenquent taxes and a passion for binge watching home improvement by age 50
>work only when I feel like it
>always home
>wife dead
>Kids grown and off somewhere not doing a fucking thing Mom and Dad recommended like oh, say, college
>down a bottle of homemade cider followed by a six pack of Sierra Nevada
>only thing left to do is masturbate and browse 4chins
>go to bed
>wife rolls over in her grave
>Tomorrow I get picrel out of jail
>Life is good at least what's left of it
>strawmanning this hard
Someone's butthurt. Post proof of your situation. Bet you don't even have a wife, you're just imagining problems up ahead to cope with your inceldom.
So this is the life of the average PrepHole white supremacist.
Shotguns are a US police feature. In Europe they always used submachine guns or bolt actions rifles for example.
Submachine butt plugs bolt action butt plugs no doubt
sheriff in my county has both. They have their handgun on them always, 12 gauge pump and a AR pattern rifle in the center rack of the car.
Live in Cali by the way, in a lib area
Same. Did you find that out by getting arrested? That's how I found out
No, I was on a run and I saw the sheriff with his window open and I said hi and made some small chitchat
They do the same in Canada
What are you talking about, they still have the shot gun. The rifle was added.
I do but then we didn't have the Patriot Act to defend our freedom.
God bless biden
Remember when criminal elements weren’t running around with fully automatic rifles killing people?
Holy shit what the absolute fuck happened to this board.
Remember that time when the squid totally beefed it?
I want to lick those boot plz
I love anonymous posting but it sucks when there's a love triangle argument going on
I think things are safer now than they were, but I also think that guns are cool and I don't particularly care how many people are shooting each other with them. I want to also add that comparing gun deaths is stupid without looking at overall homicide rates. No shit people are shooting and killing each other and themselves when they have access to guns. It's easy. That is the point. But is restricting access to firearms actually reducing overall homicide and suicide rates? That is the more important question. Not that I personally care what the answer is because I am willing to sacrifice every single one of you in order to keep punching holes in paper at distance.
>Not that I personally care what the answer is because I am willing to sacrifice every single one of you in order to keep punching holes in paper at distance
100x this
Yep, back before youtube when shotguns stopped being effective and ARs became the only guns capable of killing future astronauts
If you claim morons are the problem, why the fuck are you arming morons with guns? Fucking retard Americans.
Because if they misuse the gun they can be shot legally.
Also, they shoot each other more than anyone else.
Not an efficient system but it does work.
You have no rights whatsoever and come here to brag about it?
Can a good slug fuck up an enemy with body armor?
Hell yes it can. The raw inertia even if body armor stops the projectile is gonna break a bone or do some deep tissue damage
batekun if you post something retarded again online for attention im raping you.
Russian detected. Иди нaхyй.
>Not all of us interested in weapons trust ourselves enough to actually touch them, we just want to look at pictures of them on PrepHole
Or be licensed weapons users, or be primarily interested in military weapons, or whatever. Stop pretending PrepHole is exclusively for right wing American wiggers, it never was.
I'm not pretending that, I'm a right-wing Canadian. But if you think that
>gun-free society is something to brag about
then you're a gay and you're going to be made fun of on the weapons board, might as well get used to it.
>noguns gay
Opinion discarded. Go have a nice day or screech in the war shilling threads
GO BACK GET OUTTA HERE moron
>Rember back in the days
> shotguns
Through the use of magic mushrooms in my youth
I have remembered many of my past lives
and the deaths. I have been clubbed. speared
with flint tips, hacked by bronze swords and one
of my last deaths.... By shotgun. see pic.
But By Far, The worst death was by a giant
cave bear... Eaten alive and Shitted off a cliff.
i've watched hundreds of police shootings and body armor is basically a non-issue. people love to hype it up because the idea that there's invincible iron man criminals running around that cannot be killed is really scary
being a cowboy was like being a fruit picker, it was a shi, lowly job that people hired literally anyone for. it was the most ethnically diverse job you could find in the west, full of chinese and blacks and yadda yadda. some cool movies, sure, but those were just movies being romantic about it.
its like the "the women behind the moon landing" whatever movie. yes, rooms full of people doing the bitch work for the real mathematicians existed. it was grunt work, they chose black people because they could...pay them less. the movie hilariously missed how shitty of a situation it really was.
Shitskin take
ah yes, "white" men like Goldstein and Sachs lmao
>posing for camera looking like a gay porno actor in a store that has already been looted and defaced
To protect and serve
do motorcycle cops even still exist because i don't think i've seen one in the wild in 20 years
They're on the highways doing 110 mph on the lookout for people going 5 over
I saw one in one of those videos of people doing 150+ on the interstate. Guy’s shifter stopped working so he pulled over and a motorcycle cop stopped to check on him and didn’t notice or mention him not having a plate lol
Cops here have both. If they are on the SWAT team, they might have extra in the truck, something like an MP5 unironically. Also one of the reasons shotguns were so prolific for police, is that the average American kid probably grew up with shotguns in some capacity. Whereas rifles was much more a toss up. There was a time though where a good percentage of 12 year old American boys was already proficient with a shotgun. Also ARs have just become so accessible, cheap, versatile, commonplace, etc, that there's almost no reason not to.
Differences is wealth where smaller. It'll be harder and harder to keep system as US one stable over time and we'll se cops being more and more militarized.
I predict in 30 years cops will drive around in fully armored vehicles, wear full body armor and full auto rifles.
Remember back in the days when free living Americans used to have shoot outs with cops and win? Yeah well they all carry rifles and wear plates now.
No, the narrative is completely broken. Indians misbehaving is not "wild" in any sense of the word.
I don't give a fuck what your gay basedboy youtuber liberals say bruh west was wild end of story. Go cry about it to the twitter mafia if you don't like it snowflake.
This channel and the very real history it discusses single handily blows the fuck out of of all you gay revisionists that claim the west was never wild
https://www.youtube.com/@historyattheokcorral/videos
Looking through the videos it appears to be almost entirely about Indian wars. Comanche, Apache, Cheyenne, Blackfoot, etc. attacking, enslaving, and killing settlers. When gun control advocates say the west was wild they mean that a well armed population was driven mad by the guns in their presence and committed crimes at a greater rate than settled people in the eastern US, and that just isn't true.
If you want to know the real history of gun control in the old west the best example is probably the Wounded Knee Massacre. On December 29, 1890 the US Army 7th Cav tracked down a group of a little over 300 hungry Lakota at Wounded Knee. The soldiers confiscated all of the rifles the Lakota had, then started shooting into the camp. By the end of the "battle" over 300 innocent Lakota were dead, murdered by agents of the state.
I get what you're saying about contemporary political takes on the wild west. But my point is that, gun crimes, or no, it was an incredibly violent and wild place/time in history and whitewashing it as this kumbaya fairytale land is disingenuous and disrespectful to the decedents of the settlers and especially the natives that fought them.
>no you don't get it, injins attacking is the same thing as crime today, even though injins were a separate nation
>goalposts, moving, etc etc
It was violent as shit and you'd piss your pants and cry now fuck off
nah, its less violent than anywhere blacks lived in the 70s, 80s, or now. Because the majority of black males in the usa do murder, rape and cannibalism
If it's comparable to the more dangerous cities today then it was pretty wild as a resident of Birmingham Alabama that regularly, and occasionally contributes to, hearing gunshots
I work in corrections and all I get is a M&P and a 870 at work. They get the job done I guess.
You ever shot somebody with the 870? What's it like?
When I was a cop (93-03) I was psyched I got selected to be one of the two guys on my squad with a shotgun. Plain Jane 14” 870, wood furniture, bead sight. I remember being on post during the DC sniper and thinking how nice a rifle would be if I’m watching a wood line at 100M+. When I went to a fed agency, we still only had shotguns and select guys who had MP5’s.
i remember the miami dade fbi shooting, yes.
turns out when feds only have handguns and criminals have mini-14's and shotguns, you have a bad, bad time.
for historical context, this is why the fbi tried to adopt 10mm. take a look at how many "lethal" hits matix and platt took and kept fighting. not even on any drugs.