no they did that too by accident and it has most likely caused the wild ones to go extinct. There’s supposedly 5 subspecies of Chinese giant salamander. But the farmed ones are all genetically homogeneous mutts. So when they were released and started breading with the wild population they were all replaced and muttefied as well. Kinda similar to what to wild horses
There' a reason they're slowly trying to move away from Soviet inspirations. Doesn't mean they'll suddenly start making amazing stuff, but at least they're starting to steal from better designs.
India would need to cross the Himalayas and is in no better shape. Russia is fricked for the next 1000 years. Pakistan would probably starve to death in Tibet and Xinjang before they ever got close to anywhere important. North Korea is in no better shape than China.
Everybody else needs to go through China's coastal antiship missile defense designed to take out the entire US Navy, unless you're positing an invasion of Russia or Iran first and then a long, long, long overland march to China.
>China is an authoritarian shithole.
The best form of government is known to be a benevolent dictatorship. China has a leadership that is focused on progress and isn't saddled by needing to cater to Flat Earthers and climate change deniers.
>Ywn take the 20th Century Limited from your office in Chicago to NYC on a busness trip >Ywn walk into a random gunstore and buy a Thompson submachine gun no questions asked
>benevolent
Its only been 30 years since they were literally machine gunning their own people in the streets wumao. But you never learned that in history did you
Tallest Buildings are a losing game and we've been in multiple real estate crashes since then. Since only Real Estate dumbasses build the damn things, they gave up.
Meanwhile, Dubai already beat China's tallest buildings. Guess that means the slave-using desert land speck is apparently stronger than all of mainland China.
Lmao their skyscrapers also sometimes shake uncontrollably because the engineering and construction isn't great.
I've seen videos of this several times, with crowds of people fleeing in the street because they're certain the fricking things are vibrating too much to remain standing.
I don't think any have actually collapsed, but it's probably only a matter of time.
Can you find one thing to be proud of in that country that doesn't have a glaring, obvious problem?
Seriously, anything at all?
>Clinton, the opposition candidate wins in 1992. >Bush, the opposition candidate, wins in 2000. >Obama, the opposition candidate, wins in 2008. >Trump, the opposition candidate wins, in 2016 >Biden, the opposition candidates wins, in 2020.
Control of the presidency has switched five times in the last thirty years. What part of this is a "one-party system", Chang?
2 years ago
Anonymous
The part where you voted for a violent insurrection leading to a permanent one-party system that was only thwarted because Trump was utterly incompetent.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Thank god we were saved from becoming a one-party, non-democratic state like China!
2 years ago
Anonymous
One under Trump.
China actually has competent leadership aimed at the improvement of the country, not the leader's ego.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>not the leader's ego
Is that why they're about to elect Xi president-for-life? To reward him for being so humble, I mean?
2 years ago
Anonymous
When was the last time Xi complained about not being on Twitter?
2 years ago
Anonymous
We're talking about Dear Leader's unambitious nature and lack of ego right now, wumao. Now do you think Xi will start using the title of Emperor after he's reelected?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Do you not notice the difference?
>MUH TWITTER ACCOUNT! MUH TWITTER ACCOUNT! WAAAAAAAAAH I WAS BANNED FROM TWITTER! MUH TWITTER! MUH TWITTER! MUH TWITTER!
>We need to protect our population from deadly diseases and Islamic terrorism; build railroads, roads, renewable energy, semiconductor manufacturing, modern housing, agricultural advancements, educate our population, and work on fusion power.
2 years ago
Anonymous
We're STILL talking about Dear Leader's unambitious nature and lack of ego right now, wumao. Do you think he will declare war on the sparrows and make everyone melt down their tools like in Great Leap Forward? How many millions do you think will starve this time? Mao's high score was 15-40 million but China only had 650 million people back then, so I think Xi can kill at least 75 million no problem.
2 years ago
Anonymous
One under Trump.
China actually has competent leadership aimed at the improvement of the country, not the leader's ego.
You are both homosexuals tbh.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>competent leadership >builds themselves into the worst property bubble on the planet and triggers a mass capital exodus by not allowing people to buy property, only lease
>alienates and bullies every single surrounding state into the arms of their greatest rival through a feat of monumental diplomatic incompetence
>completely fails to export culture, gets mogged by countries with 1/40th their population
2 years ago
Anonymous
Having too much wealth is the absence of a problem.
China's borders are still secure and their factories are still running.
2 years ago
Anonymous
and bullies every single surrounding state into the arms of their greatest rival through a feat of monumental diplomatic incompetence
North Korea is a Chang b***h. Russia is fast becoming China's b***h. Mongolia is Neutral. The Stans are in China's pocket, especially now that Russia is tanking. Laos & Cambodia are China's b***hes as well. Thailand is Neutral (as usual). Burma technically is Neutral but gets a lot of defense spending from China. India is secured by the Himalayas anyway (and China's allies in Pakistan, Nepal, and friendly countries like Bangladesh) and thanks to Russia's tanking, is gonna get neutral rather soon.
Nothing really is different that much besides Russia's decline. In the anti-China camp you still only have Japan (a pacifist power), Taiwan (relies on the US for defense), Vietnam (ostensibly anti-China but its Commie party relies on China for trade and business) and the Philippines (whose corrupt leaders are compromised by Chinese money).
2 years ago
Anonymous
I wonder what your next wutaboutism is going to be.
This is flatly not true the ZTZ-96 has been exported to Africa and has seen plenty of combat there. In Sudan they were involved in an engagement with T-72's and performed better than the Russian exports, and that's with moronic African crews.
You'll have to excuse the blurry photo as it is EXTREMELY hard to find pics of African ZTZ-96's (called VT-1 through 4's over there)
>inferior copies
This has not been true for several years (literally since the early 90s), please inform yourself, and no I'm not a fricking chink shill. It's true most of their stuff is loosely based off Russian shit but a lot of it has been upgraded with western derived tech packages. It's wrong to think of them as inferior copies but rather improved copies, even if only minutely.
They're basically western tech in a Russian package.
They might do better if they can actually produce it, since Russia makes shit products and then doesn't produce them anyway. However, pretty much every Chinese design suffers from asterisks around components that aren't as good as Russian spec when they're produced domestically. That paints a pretty grim fricking picture. We also have seen what years of Chinese "maintenance" has done to their imports and leases. China has been outspending itself on military development, and when the costs of that development come and get ignored like they've ignored maintenance costs before, they'll be the same sack of hollow shit Russia turned itself into.
Just over 50 years ago Chinese people were butchering and cannibalizing each other in the street by the tens of thousands because of some off-hand comments by dumb frick mao, they aren't a threat to anyone but themselves
the tor copy is better than the russian one and has a datalink to link with other chinese vehicles. any moron who thinks copying a vehicle is easy never passed engineering class.
Chinese stuff is probably better. They got Russian stuff as base architecture and also steal stuff from the west and are also sometimes just genuinely creative and have good ideas. They're not all drones, but a fair share of their legit smart people end up defecting to the west because they have more liberty to try weird shit here. Chinese defectoids who idealize the US is a whole weird demographic we have here. Fricking sucks that the KMT lost. We'd have a whole weird Asian USA if the CCP was McNuked.
Hey China, if your weapons are everything you say they are, send Russia some so we can see how they do on the battlefield.
No?
Then shut the FRICK up chink monkey.
-Sincerely, NATO
>Is China fricked?
That remains to be seen. My guess is "Probably"
It’s over for china
Wanna see a dude cook one of those?
NO!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_giant_salamander
Wikipedia says this is a critically endangered species... Fricking godless asiatics
No the wild ones are critically endangered (from eating) but they farm them now
Instead of needing them for releasing back into the wild they simply just eat them…Good job China.
no they did that too by accident and it has most likely caused the wild ones to go extinct. There’s supposedly 5 subspecies of Chinese giant salamander. But the farmed ones are all genetically homogeneous mutts. So when they were released and started breading with the wild population they were all replaced and muttefied as well. Kinda similar to what to wild horses
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/04/science/giant-salamanders-china.html
Nooo not the mini godzilla, why are asians so soulless?
>"hello everyone this is Wang Gang"
can't make this shit up
china on that kung flu 2.0 speed run
looks pretty good actually but I'm a floridaman and I've eaten gator before, shit's good.
He's a good chef, I've made dishes based on some of his videos, they turned out well.
noooo not the meme aminelllll, kill and cook a cow instead aaaaa
If india goes to war with china we can find out and nothing of value would be lost.
ukie airforce and their tb2 fleet all gone by russian sams though 🙂
>being proud your AD has finally figured out the problem of shooting down a slow, low flying non-stealthy drone
Are vatniks really like this?
>all gone
You've claimed this since February, they're still flying sorties.
Bait aside, ukies fly planes that is even older than those SAMs, how the hell they still fly?
fake news, last uaf airplane was destroyed on 6th of may!
There' a reason they're slowly trying to move away from Soviet inspirations. Doesn't mean they'll suddenly start making amazing stuff, but at least they're starting to steal from better designs.
At this point, the chink knockoffs probably work better than the russ originals. Which isn't saying much.
China is a century ahead of Russia in terms of electronics & software. So their shit might actually work.
>is china fricked?
From who?
India would need to cross the Himalayas and is in no better shape. Russia is fricked for the next 1000 years. Pakistan would probably starve to death in Tibet and Xinjang before they ever got close to anywhere important. North Korea is in no better shape than China.
Everybody else needs to go through China's coastal antiship missile defense designed to take out the entire US Navy, unless you're positing an invasion of Russia or Iran first and then a long, long, long overland march to China.
>still believing in the missile system that only exists on paper
You thought Russia was strong, didn't you?
>Highly-maneuverable, hypersonic anti-shipping ballistic missiles.
>No, you can't see them.
>pakistan
Bro
>From who?
Chinese
I mean, Ukrainians have improved their tank designs with automatic transmissions and modern optics, so the chinks could potentially do the same.
their cloned tech might actually be better than the russian brand at this point. Thats not saying much though.
If they can produce them is already an upgrade.
China is an authoritarian shithole. That vehicle's armor is probably aluminum, and it won't go 10 miles before having a flat tire.
Better than being made of aluminum, going nowhere, and still getting a flat tire.
>China is an authoritarian shithole.
The best form of government is known to be a benevolent dictatorship. China has a leadership that is focused on progress and isn't saddled by needing to cater to Flat Earthers and climate change deniers.
>muh trains
Every time.
This was the American railroad network in 1890, your map is legitimately pathetic, bug person.
I want to go back in time and kill the automotive lobby
>Ywn take the 20th Century Limited from your office in Chicago to NYC on a busness trip
>Ywn walk into a random gunstore and buy a Thompson submachine gun no questions asked
I wanna go back
this homie doesn't know about the bad emperor problem
>benevolent dictatorship
So not china, then?
>benevolent
Its only been 30 years since they were literally machine gunning their own people in the streets wumao. But you never learned that in history did you
The US has had the exact same 30 years to add to this list. Interesting that only one country has been successful at it.
>Benevolent governments is when buildings are tall and absolutely nothing happened on June 4th, 1989
Managed to avoid the devastation of Western Imperialism that wracked the rest of the Third World.
What's that got to do with tall buildings and publicly massacring several hundred of your own people?
Tallest Buildings are a losing game and we've been in multiple real estate crashes since then. Since only Real Estate dumbasses build the damn things, they gave up.
Meanwhile, Dubai already beat China's tallest buildings. Guess that means the slave-using desert land speck is apparently stronger than all of mainland China.
Lmao their skyscrapers also sometimes shake uncontrollably because the engineering and construction isn't great.
I've seen videos of this several times, with crowds of people fleeing in the street because they're certain the fricking things are vibrating too much to remain standing.
I don't think any have actually collapsed, but it's probably only a matter of time.
Can you find one thing to be proud of in that country that doesn't have a glaring, obvious problem?
Seriously, anything at all?
>The best form of government is known to be a benevolent dictatorship.
Ok, but what about corrupt one-party authoritarian oligarchies?
I don't know. You voted for Trump, so you tell me?
>Clinton, the opposition candidate wins in 1992.
>Bush, the opposition candidate, wins in 2000.
>Obama, the opposition candidate, wins in 2008.
>Trump, the opposition candidate wins, in 2016
>Biden, the opposition candidates wins, in 2020.
Control of the presidency has switched five times in the last thirty years. What part of this is a "one-party system", Chang?
The part where you voted for a violent insurrection leading to a permanent one-party system that was only thwarted because Trump was utterly incompetent.
Thank god we were saved from becoming a one-party, non-democratic state like China!
One under Trump.
China actually has competent leadership aimed at the improvement of the country, not the leader's ego.
>not the leader's ego
Is that why they're about to elect Xi president-for-life? To reward him for being so humble, I mean?
When was the last time Xi complained about not being on Twitter?
We're talking about Dear Leader's unambitious nature and lack of ego right now, wumao. Now do you think Xi will start using the title of Emperor after he's reelected?
Do you not notice the difference?
>MUH TWITTER ACCOUNT! MUH TWITTER ACCOUNT! WAAAAAAAAAH I WAS BANNED FROM TWITTER! MUH TWITTER! MUH TWITTER! MUH TWITTER!
>We need to protect our population from deadly diseases and Islamic terrorism; build railroads, roads, renewable energy, semiconductor manufacturing, modern housing, agricultural advancements, educate our population, and work on fusion power.
We're STILL talking about Dear Leader's unambitious nature and lack of ego right now, wumao. Do you think he will declare war on the sparrows and make everyone melt down their tools like in Great Leap Forward? How many millions do you think will starve this time? Mao's high score was 15-40 million but China only had 650 million people back then, so I think Xi can kill at least 75 million no problem.
You are both homosexuals tbh.
>competent leadership
>builds themselves into the worst property bubble on the planet and triggers a mass capital exodus by not allowing people to buy property, only lease
>alienates and bullies every single surrounding state into the arms of their greatest rival through a feat of monumental diplomatic incompetence
>completely fails to export culture, gets mogged by countries with 1/40th their population
Having too much wealth is the absence of a problem.
China's borders are still secure and their factories are still running.
and bullies every single surrounding state into the arms of their greatest rival through a feat of monumental diplomatic incompetence
North Korea is a Chang b***h. Russia is fast becoming China's b***h. Mongolia is Neutral. The Stans are in China's pocket, especially now that Russia is tanking. Laos & Cambodia are China's b***hes as well. Thailand is Neutral (as usual). Burma technically is Neutral but gets a lot of defense spending from China. India is secured by the Himalayas anyway (and China's allies in Pakistan, Nepal, and friendly countries like Bangladesh) and thanks to Russia's tanking, is gonna get neutral rather soon.
Nothing really is different that much besides Russia's decline. In the anti-China camp you still only have Japan (a pacifist power), Taiwan (relies on the US for defense), Vietnam (ostensibly anti-China but its Commie party relies on China for trade and business) and the Philippines (whose corrupt leaders are compromised by Chinese money).
I wonder what your next wutaboutism is going to be.
This is flatly not true the ZTZ-96 has been exported to Africa and has seen plenty of combat there. In Sudan they were involved in an engagement with T-72's and performed better than the Russian exports, and that's with moronic African crews.
You'll have to excuse the blurry photo as it is EXTREMELY hard to find pics of African ZTZ-96's (called VT-1 through 4's over there)
pee pee in your coke
lel drunk changposting
they started switching to copying NATO awhile ago.
Anon, Russian tech has shown to be alright, so long as it isn't made by Russians.
>inferior copies
This has not been true for several years (literally since the early 90s), please inform yourself, and no I'm not a fricking chink shill. It's true most of their stuff is loosely based off Russian shit but a lot of it has been upgraded with western derived tech packages. It's wrong to think of them as inferior copies but rather improved copies, even if only minutely.
They're basically western tech in a Russian package.
well, russian derived designs with ~20ish year old western tech, but that’s both 20ish years further than russian gear and also not totally awful
They might do better if they can actually produce it, since Russia makes shit products and then doesn't produce them anyway. However, pretty much every Chinese design suffers from asterisks around components that aren't as good as Russian spec when they're produced domestically. That paints a pretty grim fricking picture. We also have seen what years of Chinese "maintenance" has done to their imports and leases. China has been outspending itself on military development, and when the costs of that development come and get ignored like they've ignored maintenance costs before, they'll be the same sack of hollow shit Russia turned itself into.
Just over 50 years ago Chinese people were butchering and cannibalizing each other in the street by the tens of thousands because of some off-hand comments by dumb frick mao, they aren't a threat to anyone but themselves
I thought China didn't like Tor?
Of course they don't.
It's basically an improved HQ-7 is derived from Crotale
>produces inferior copies of already shit russhit tech
That ended in the early 2000s they're all about copying from everyone now.
the tor copy is better than the russian one and has a datalink to link with other chinese vehicles. any moron who thinks copying a vehicle is easy never passed engineering class.
Chinese stuff is probably better. They got Russian stuff as base architecture and also steal stuff from the west and are also sometimes just genuinely creative and have good ideas. They're not all drones, but a fair share of their legit smart people end up defecting to the west because they have more liberty to try weird shit here. Chinese defectoids who idealize the US is a whole weird demographic we have here. Fricking sucks that the KMT lost. We'd have a whole weird Asian USA if the CCP was McNuked.
>produces inferior copies
ah yeah yet another
>i know every spec of the russian counterpart
>i also know every spec of the chinese copy
/k/ user
Hey China, if your weapons are everything you say they are, send Russia some so we can see how they do on the battlefield.
No?
Then shut the FRICK up chink monkey.
-Sincerely, NATO