Pretty clear "Full Mobilization" is just Girkin wishful thinking, because WEAPONS, correct?

I mean Strelkov thinks if Russia just magically grabs everyone up and mobilizes for mass warfare, that will magically restore all Russia's lost WEAPONS. What WEAPONS does Russia even have left at this point besides "Muh Nooks"? A lot of Russian advanced weapons-manufacturing was reliant on Western components.

And all the manpower in the Vatnik universe cannot erase a simple fact: without fuel, vehicles cannot move. Without food + water, soldiers die. Without ammo, weapons cannot fire. Disable Russian logistics and the entire house of cards fucking collapses, like a body with all its arteries cut.

Stelkov's "Muh Mass Mobilization" is just a pathetic self-delusion at this point. Russia doesn't have the weapons and far more importantly, it does not have the logistics or the supplies for them.

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    At month 5 I'm honestly surprised that Russian troops aren't going full Potemkin and killing their officers.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They were in the Kiev front there for awhile. A symptom of why that whole objective just collapsed. Little more difficult now that the front is more concentrated and heavily monitored.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They have Kadyrov for this case.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        When does he start a Twitch channel?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lmao PrepHoleopers know oinkraine is finished so the only thing they can do is pathetic pay ops against Russian soldiers

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You keep saying Ukraine is finished, yet it keeps taking more and more of your military just to stay in the fight at all, lol.

        Pathetic.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    despite all their fuck ups russians still have a lot of equipment. ofc strelkov is seething but he's not wrong.
    but mobilisation isn't going to solve their logistics problems and stuff like that. also mass mobilisation is ordered if country declares war and as we see, russia is still hiding behind muh speshul operation.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Throwing all that equipment into the fray results in them burning through their decreasing supplies that much faster.

      Which, of course, is why I advocate the most complete destruction of Russia's logistical system NOW.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Them declaring war essentially confirms them as naked aggressors. It also comes with a lot of stipulations about other countries not helping you and shit now a days

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >that will magically restore all Russia's lost WEAPONS
    Nah, it's all about WW2 cult and larping it in the real war. Yes, this also include human wave tactic.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The problem with mobilization isn't the guns i'm pretty certaint russia has enough guns and bullets for every man woman and child not good guns but guns regardless.
    No the problem with mobilizing all those people is everything else.

    How do you feed and water all those mouths?
    Where do you keep them?
    How do you move them around and how do command them?

    Russia is already struggling with all of that, if it mobilizes it dies.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Truly they're nothing without lend-lease.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Lend lease was less than 10% of all the Soviet unions war production

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Quality, not quantity. We've seen what havoc HIMARS has unleashed on Russian invasion forces.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >We've seen what havoc HIMARS has unleashed on Russian invasion forces.
            YES himarsisters the potholes will cripple the Russian economy!

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              post FIRMS

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's the issue Strelkov's brain refuses to advocate, because then he'll see it really is fucking hopeless for Russia.

      You cannot fight without a fucking supply chain.

      Ukraine can find all manner of unseemly ways to disrupt that even without HIMARS: cut fuel lines, cut brake lines, sand/water/sugar (and most critically bleach) in Russian gas tanks, IEDs in the roads, drone strikes, portable derailers, tire shredders police-grade, simple insurgent attacks, fucking nails thrown all over a road, etc.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >How do you feed and water all those mouths?
      Let them starve.
      >Where do you keep them?
      In the gulags.
      >How do you move them around and how do command them?
      Shoot those who refuse to cooperate, others will move forward out of fear of being killed.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If you do that then you don't have an army anymore

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      live off the land like napoleon

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Napoleon's problem is that eventually his troops ran out of shit to pillage.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    War is logistics and economics.
    Will mobilization allow Russia to transport supplies to the front and import western parts? There's your answer.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Monke declaring mass mobilisation could get him toppled because of how much people would resist it. The war is deeply unpopular among Russians despite those "polls" you see. It's a "special military operation" purely for legal reasons. This allows the Russian masses to live their lives without being impacted by the war (aside from sanctions). Monke may be retarded, but he knows how to cling to power

Your email address will not be published.