All of these are complete trash, at least in the hands of the Russians, the T90-S, the SU-34, the TOS-1, and the VSS Vintorez.
All of these are complete trash, at least in the hands of the Russians, the T90-S, the SU-34, the TOS-1, and the VSS Vintorez.
Russians
>"It wuz monkey models, dey wuz sandBlack folk and shiet."
>t. soviet russians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Rimon_20
HAAHA, we you the anon I was replying to a couple of days about that? Regardless, I love when I see it posted. The Russians are ignorant jackasses and deserved every loss.
Don't talk shit about the VSS Black person
I'll never understand /k/'s obesstion in the past 5 years of sucking off Israelis. I get trolling Armatards was hysterical but now youse are unironically simping for the IDF, the worlds mortal enemy. Board fell off completely
As fricked as Israel is, you cannot deny that they are an effective fighting force.
Whether you love em or hate em, there's no denying israelites are insanely smart.
>recognizing competence = simping
If you hope to challenge "the worlds [sic] mortal enemy", you should drop that unproductive mentality.
Little did they know, that they were the monke models all along
>SU-34
Didn't these frickers already lose like 2 dozen of them?
The Su-34 looks so sexy FRICK
I always thought the VSS would make a great woods gun.
russians are like those guys with max lvl toons that only care about design instead of strong armor and weps
i never realized how tiny the range of the TOS was, its practically worthless
It's great for demolishing apartment blocks full of non-combatants.
Id trust the danes or sweeds or brits with 50 T-90s before Id trust the russians with 50 M1a2's
>The VSS Vintorez is useless
VSSbros... we got too wienery...
It’s over
It’s hard to give any sort of accurate assessment of most of the weapons systems Russia uses because of how poorly the Russians have used them.
The exception to that I would say is their long range pgms. They should have wreaked I higher toll in the opening phase of the war.
All of those could be useful weapons in the hands of a NATO country. Except maybe the TOS, I dont' see the function being worth the cost. That said, they are all cumulatively rendered useless by:
>Russia going it alone due to diplomatic isolation
>Being crippled in the design phase by a lack of funding
>Built by the most corrupt people on earth
>Serviced by thieves when maintained at all
>Crewed by guys who can barely operate it
>Commanded by morons known for slavish loyalty rather than competence.
again, skill issue
that one lost T-90M was abandoned without even being deactivated by a simple grenade
That's boring.
At some point I'd rather see a thread about Warsaw pact stuff that worked (or works).
I'll say something I'll probably get crucified for:
Individual weapon systems don't matter nearly as much, as the way they are implemented.
Replace Abrams with modern T-90 variants and the US wont have much of an issue making it work.
Give Turks Leopard 2s and they will get roasted by IEDs.
That said, I will never forget the abysmall reviews the Vintorez got. I really loved that lil moron, until Ukraine that is.
What are the reviews?
>T90-S
there are only a couple of dozen left.
>SU-34
there are only a couple of dozen left.
>TOS-1
the range of this artillery is only five kilometers lmao
>VSS Vintorez
the bullet is not able to penetrate body armor