PFFFFT HAHAHHAHAHA. You literally can't make this shit up

PFFFFT HAHAHHAHAHA
You literally can't make this shit up
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_destroyer_Guangzhou_(160)

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >read story
    >some disgruntled guy blows up the armoury
    OP misled me into thinking there was some actual interesting story

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    ??????

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Man breaks up with woman to pursue life in the navy
      >Political officer determine man is disloyal
      >Man begs to stay in Navy
      >Political officer fires him anyway
      >Navy still employs him
      >Man uses ship ordinance to commit suicide.
      Political officers are bullshit.

      This sounds like CCP bullshit.
      >If the political officer would have had his the guy wouldn't have been on the ship, aka political officer is always right.
      >we have no idea what happened or what munitions started it or where or if he bored a hole in the ship, but it's definitely the fault of this one guy
      >no it wasn't our shitty ships, shitty ammo, or shitty sailors - it was one entire Chinese soap opera of backstory details that led to this
      It was obviously a bullshit story for the idiot Chinese public. It checks all the boxes. And, they don't even know what happened or exactly where - half the crew died, presumably everyone near the explosion died, so instead of even questioning if any bit of Chinese training, protocol, weapon design, ship design, or maintenance was the problem we'll assure everyone it was this one guy who just happens to have a dozen Chinese drama tropes none of which are remotely the fault of the government or the military.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        On the contrary, the official story castigates the Polical Officers, PLAN personnel management, the base commander, and to a lesser extend the post-cultural revolution culture of China. Rather than this being just an isolated issue of faulty munitions storage, we have a massive case of negligence enabled by the PRC's political structure.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >On the contrary, the official story castigates the Polical Officers, PLAN personnel management, the base commander, and to a lesser extend the post-cultural revolution culture of China. Rather than this being just an isolated issue of faulty munitions storage, we have a massive case of negligence enabled by the PRC's political structure.

          you are looking at it with a very western perspective

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            And how would the Chinese see this?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Just squint at the green text really hard

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I laughed. I'm not proud of it, but I laughed.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Well I'd imagine they wouldn't understand the language

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Special Face-Saving Opelation

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              they'd follow the lead of authority. and blame the character with the most familial shame

              Yeah, the Navy is notorious for pushing the blame for accidents into character attacks on whichever junior enlisted sailor was closest to it, like how they claimed the Iowa turret explosion was caused by the two gunners having gay buttsex or the Oriskany fire in Vietnam was caused by a disgruntled sailor when there was actually a design flaw in an aircraft generator.

              >they claimed the Iowa turret explosion was caused by the two gunners having gay buttsex
              kek If this was really what happened theres no way they'd ever admit to it

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If you think that's great, you should see what the British got up to

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/l1NEgsH.png

      The Moskva if we're staying within the topic of this thread.

      Source?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Source for the first one is ARRSE, as stated within it at the top. It's a British military wiki, as far as I know it's largely run by British servicemen.
        As for the Porter, here:
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_William_D._Porter_(DD-579)
        We can laugh at ourselves you know. The Russian (authoritarian) way would be to cover it up in red tape and execute anyone who knew anyone associated with it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Source for the first one is ARRSE, as stated within it at the top. It's a British military wiki, as far as I know it's largely run by British servicemen.
        As for the Porter, here:
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_William_D._Porter_(DD-579)
        We can laugh at ourselves you know. The Russian (authoritarian) way would be to cover it up in red tape and execute anyone who knew anyone associated with it.

        ?si=CtAEZ4CIzczNwtxo

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          thanks for homosexual stickman youtuber that blogs offtopic for half the video

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    what blew up in Ukraine?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The Moskva if we're staying within the topic of this thread.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        DON'T SHOOT, WE'RE REPUBLICANS

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Even funnier since it happened just 4 years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Bonhomme_Richard_(LHD-6)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Before the article 32 hearing, the accused sailor's attorney stated that the portrayal of his client has been unfair and that he looks forward to proving his client is innocent. Dozens of Navy officials, including several admirals, "have faced disciplinary action for failures that investigators said prevented the blaze from being put out sooner." He said there is "evidence that the fire was started because of negligence and the improper storage of lithium batteries close to crates of hand sanitizer."[46]

      On 19 September 2022, Mays's trial began at Naval Base San Diego.[47] On 30 September after a two-week trial, a military judge acquitted Mays on both charges (arson and willful hazarding of a vessel).

      wait, so he was acquitted?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah its just like the gay sailor that blew up the battleship turret

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, the Navy is notorious for pushing the blame for accidents into character attacks on whichever junior enlisted sailor was closest to it, like how they claimed the Iowa turret explosion was caused by the two gunners having gay buttsex or the Oriskany fire in Vietnam was caused by a disgruntled sailor when there was actually a design flaw in an aircraft generator.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Miss the good old days when we just blamed those things on some loser country and stole their stuff.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That bituminous coal was working for those dastardly Spaniards!

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Kinda like people want to blame McCain for the Forestall fire when he was on the end of the deck getting hit by a Zuni.

          Turns out, the fire was because Zuni safety procedures were actually dogshit and WW2 surplus bombs are super unsafe.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Man breaks up with woman to pursue life in the navy
    >Political officer determine man is disloyal
    >Man begs to stay in Navy
    >Political officer fires him anyway
    >Navy still employs him
    >Man uses ship ordinance to commit suicide.
    Political officers are bullshit.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I think it was actually made up.

    >I can't go back to the village because they all know me and hate me
    >for that whole forcing the village girl to suicide thing
    >so I'll sink our proud nearnew vessel that hasn't so much as a bullethole
    >along with whomever has the bad luck of being on duty with me
    >ensuring that their families and possibly the rest of Guangdong province will hate me
    >all the way to Beijing

    There were rifles and pistols recovered from the wreck; this dummy could have just dramatically ate a pistol with a locket in his hand.

    But he chose to eat a sea mine or torpedo.

    It's so high effort and meticulous for a suicide.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Considering how these things go, maybe he just decided to shoot himself in the privacy of the weapons locker, not sparing one thought as to what his bullet would hit after it left his skull.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      This sounds like CCP bullshit.
      >If the political officer would have had his the guy wouldn't have been on the ship, aka political officer is always right.
      >we have no idea what happened or what munitions started it or where or if he bored a hole in the ship, but it's definitely the fault of this one guy
      >no it wasn't our shitty ships, shitty ammo, or shitty sailors - it was one entire Chinese soap opera of backstory details that led to this
      It was obviously a bullshit story for the idiot Chinese public. It checks all the boxes. And, they don't even know what happened or exactly where - half the crew died, presumably everyone near the explosion died, so instead of even questioning if any bit of Chinese training, protocol, weapon design, ship design, or maintenance was the problem we'll assure everyone it was this one guy who just happens to have a dozen Chinese drama tropes none of which are remotely the fault of the government or the military.

      On the contrary, the official story castigates the Polical Officers, PLAN personnel management, the base commander, and to a lesser extend the post-cultural revolution culture of China. Rather than this being just an isolated issue of faulty munitions storage, we have a massive case of negligence enabled by the PRC's political structure.

      Not everything has to be a conspiracy or false flag, sometimes random schizos do very damaging things with significant prior planning for reasons that seem petty to non-schizos. Think about the Malaysian Airline and Lufthansa pilots who crashed their planes deliberately because they were depressed, or the Mandalay Bay shooter who ferried several guns and thousands of rounds of ammunition to an expensive suite overlooking a major concert & killed 50+ people for reasons that remain a mystery. Sometimes the simplest explanation (someone who was mentally unstable and shouldn't have been trusted was trusted) is the right one.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        This homie incandescent

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >muh everything is glowies
          We get it, you can't bear the thought of random uncontrollable bullshit that nobody can predict happening. Far more comfortable to believe that everything is a conspiracy and could be stopped if you just managed to deal with THEM, evne though it's copium.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    am i ugly

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        get murdered

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Pic related got memeryholed very quickly, this happened last year.
    >inb4 achually it was a fire drill exercise!
    Lol cope.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *