Parts Kits and Conversion Jigs to Hoard Before They Become Illegal

I've got multiple M16 conversion jigs, a couple of which also work on AR-10 lowers, and tons of M16 parts kit. What are some other conversion jigs and parts kits I should buy before they become illegal to sell to the general public?
https://www.opticsplanet.com/doublestar-lower-parts-kit-m-16.html

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    anon the AR-15 is one of the most common weapons in civilian hands, its NEVER getting banned. you just want to hoard things to appease the rat part of your brain.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >you just want to hoard things to appease the rat part of your brain.
      They may eventually ban the sale of select fire parts kits and conversion jigs to the general public. I made a thread a couple days ago that highlighted magazines with higher than 10 round capacities. It would only take a single incident where a converted AR-15 was used to commit a crime to get leftists and cuckservative politicians to ban their sale to the general public.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Wtf are you gonna do with some banned parts satan? You aren't gonna do shit because you're a fat pussy who can't even walk a mile. Get that shit out of your head and get some b***hes homosexual

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          this, not even baiting. you're gonna build a bunch of full auto ARs and they will sit in your house/shed/barrel and never get used because you're too afraid of dying or spending the rest of your life in prison.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >you're gonna build a bunch of full auto ARs and they will sit in your house/shed/barrel and never get used because you're too afraid of dying or spending the rest of your life in prison.
            I regularly shoot mine. I'm not some paranoid moron afraid of the police magically spawning on top of me on my bed while I'm sleeping.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >1920s
      >Alcohol is the next most common beverage to water. It is NEVER getting banned.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        anon alcohol hasn't been banned for almost a hundred years.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Neither have extended mags

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Alcohol isn't constitutionally protected but guns are and many have been banned for nearly 100 years

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Alcohol isn't constitutionally protected
            It literally is via the 21st Amendment.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              No it isn't. The 21st repealed the 18th, it didn't offer any protections.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Right, and then what happened anon?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Not that anon, but the Mafia became super influential and a major threat to the police, and prohibition resulted in ridiculous amounts of tax dollars being wasted to enforce prohibition. Also, the ATF wouldn't exist today had it not been for prohibition.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, and then what happened?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              We got the 21st Amendment, which legalized alcohol. This wouldn't happen with gun control surrounding select fire parts kits and conversion jigs.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you used to be able to buy solvent traps, which aren't completed suppressors. but, now you can't because the atf said they're actually completed suppressors.
                therefore, it seems like exactly the same steps of logic to say that select fire parts and conversion jigs are actually completed machine guns.
                because while you'd still have to put the parts together and drill them out, that's the same for solvent traps. which are illegal now.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Well, in that case, I hope you've got plenty of parts kits and conversion jigs, anon.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                sounds like a good way to have someone knock on your door, or send you a letter in the mail. maybe nothing would come of it, but that's the chilling effect at work.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >sounds like a good way to have someone knock on your door, or send you a letter in the mail.
                I have never had this happen to me. At the worst, the ATF would pay you a visit, but they wouldn't be able to get a warrant, so they would try to guilt you into letting them in your house or say something like "hand us those machine guns!" You could literally just ignore them until they leave.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you used to be able to buy solvent traps, which aren't completed suppressors. but, now you can't because the atf said they're actually completed suppressors.
                therefore, it seems like exactly the same steps of logic to say that select fire parts and conversion jigs are actually completed machine guns.
                because while you'd still have to put the parts together and drill them out, that's the same for solvent traps. which are illegal now.

                Except Bruen and the recent ruling on Chevron pose a real threat to the ATF's ability to arbitrarily make things illegal or legal.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                kinda sorta,

                in the case of full auto parts, i think it's more likely to get stepped on than to have bruen help it. bruen relies on what was legal way back when

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >bruen relies on what was legal way back when
                Wrong. Bruen stipulates that 2nd amendment regulations must have historical precedence. Therefore something must have been expressly illegal rather than not specifically permitted. Very important distinction.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i don't think that would apply in this case anyway. i don't know the law, but taking it exactly as your word and nothing else, automatic weapons are illegal and have been. so you just say that your classification is being clarified, and parts kits were always illegal, we just are enforcing it now.
                e.g. pistol brace sbr

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Except historically, there weren't restrictions placed on the type of firearm that people were permitted to own.
                >automatic weapons are illegal and have been
                Automatic weapons weren't banned until the GCA. You could buy Thompsons from Sears.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i didn't even look up "bruen" further than reading the summary on a single link on google, and that it had something to do with pistols and new york. i am not going to look it up, and i don't want you to explain it, i'm just saying some shit.

                >sounds like a good way to have someone knock on your door, or send you a letter in the mail.
                I have never had this happen to me. At the worst, the ATF would pay you a visit, but they wouldn't be able to get a warrant, so they would try to guilt you into letting them in your house or say something like "hand us those machine guns!" You could literally just ignore them until they leave.

                i don't know anyone who has ever had any authorities show up asking about anything, but, i still don't like the idea of it. but i am also the type who doesn't even like that you have to get a background check to buy a gun, or that i have a credit score, or that my bank has a history of all my purchases. i want to be a ghost.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >automatic weapons are illegal and have been
                No, that's the distinction. Automatic weapons did not exist circa 1780-1880, at least en masse, so there was no legislation addressing them. The lack of legislation means they are not expressly prohibited, and therefore the argument can be made under the Bruen standard they are legal. If the opposite were true, that something not explicitly prohibited must still be illegal, then you could not make such an argument.

                Semantically, it's a very important distinction. e.g. "Well, you didn't say that I couldn't xxxxx".

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                it's ANALOGOUS, so an analogous law would be if breach loading black powder singleshots were banned due to being too dangerous or something
                (they weren't, everybody jumped on the breach loading and cartridge bandwagons as fast as possible)

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                well that sounds nice but every bruen arguement i have heard has always referenced available technology.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Then every Bruen argument you have heard is misunderstanding it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ok well if you were 100% right the arguements would only be about the restrictions that existed back then. and yet, ever bruen arguement i have heard, they talk about what guns existed back then

                something doesnt add up, i think you are wrong. or the courts are interpreting bruen wrong. i do see people in the gun community overexaggerating what bruen is.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >the arguements would only be about the restrictions that existed back then. and yet, ever bruen arguement i have heard

                Are you talking about court filings or internet arguments here? Most people don't have the backround to understand Bruen and the exact application of the ruling is still to be determined. It is highly unlikely to repeal the NFA, but it will likely rollback mag and semiauto bans in many circuits, though it will take years.

                If you don't think Bruen is a big deal, I would direct you to the governer of California currently sperging on Twitter over Benitez's coming ruling under the Bruen standard.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >every bruen arguement i have heard has always referenced available technology

                Who is arguing? The state of California has been referencing laws prohibiting slaves from possessing weapons to argue against Duncan V. Bonta. Liberal state AGs are desperately trying to misinterpret Bruen.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It doesn't rely on what was legal then, it says restrictions should be evaluated based on those that existed then.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >another fafcg honeypot thread
    They're all traps, just build an AK parts kit or make a dias if you're going full moron in minecraft

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Friendly reminder for passers-by, it is never a good idea to store all of your eggs (whatever they may be. Especially literal eggs) in one basket. Caching gear is cheap insurance, both for normal incidents like structure fires, and less likely situations like civil unrest, divorce, and future legal issues. The Boy Scout motto "Be Prepared" should be your watchword. You don't have to bury 55gal drums of dry staple goods, your bodyweight in silver, emp-proofed commo gear and connex boxes of ammo deep innawoods. But stashing a weapon or two, some currency, tools, spare parts, etc outside the confines of your normal abode is cheap insurance against theft, loss and calamity.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Where can I find that DHS message?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you put into words what ive been thinking about doing for years. never done it though, all my shit is in my house.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    rifling makes guns too accurate, you never have a reason to shoot beyond 50 yards, why do you NEED a 200 yard musket anon give up your guns

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Bump. I really want to know of other parts kits and conversion jigs.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    why would they become illegal?
    is there some bullshit bill you can reference?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Some leftist gun control organizations might highlight how "easy" it is to make a conversion by pointing out that you can buy parts kits and conversion jigs online easily, never mind the fact that hood chimps and psychopaths are too fricking moronic to convert their rifles. They are in contact with top democrats and the president. I'm pretty sure Vice has already come out with a documentary pointing this out, but I don't watch them. As soon as some mass shooting is committed with a converted gun, the banning of sales of such items to the general public will likely happen.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So installing said parts kit makes ar’s automatic? And they’re completely legal to buy? Not to install of course but to own

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Not to install of course but to own
      Yes. You can buy parts kits and conversion jigs, and they're entirely legal to buy and own.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >So installing said parts kit makes ar’s automatic
      No. You can install the full-auto compatible trigger, hammer, disconnector, and safety selector, but you need to drill the forbidden hole - which is the illegal part - and install the auto sear to actually make it full auto.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *