OUCHIE

OUCHIE

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Very cool, now let's see Paul Allen's numbers

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >0 slava ukraini losses
      updoot or else you are a vatnik shill

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Take my heckin updooterino! Slava Ukraini! Monkey man bad.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    This tbh
    But these numbers are still huge for a post WW2 conflict. This is like warfare in Africa

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Literally frick off comparing this to a war in Africa. African wars are 95% either pop starvation or cruelties against civilians. Their casualty numbers mean nothing.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    don't worry, mom said russia got enough tanks at home

    russian tanks at home

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >don't worry, mom said russia got enough tanks at home
      Yeah....

      T-54's and T-34's....if you scrape 10 layers of rust off....and replace all the gaskets...and replace all the wiring that was sold for vodka and krokodil....and lube every part....and find new batteries and sparkplugs...mayve superglue some fake "ERA" on it....then, maybe, maybe, with luck, it'll be in tip top shape....
      to be blown to bits by all the Javelins the Yooks have on standby.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >and lube every part
        comrade conscriptovitch is lubed and ready

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Amazing that this is a picture of literal corruption in the flesh, who would be responsible for selling the ceramic plate or whatever and who are they even selling it to?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >who are they even selling it to?
          More like sold, years ago. Or never produced in the first place and just pocketed the money.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Ironically no, the T-34s were almost all sold off by the 1970s. Russia had to import several from Cambodia or Laos a few years ago for their Victory Day parades because all of the ones still left in Russia are irreparably fricked. Interestingly enough, they still have some "modernized" T-55s and PT-76s in storage, mainly because their naval infantry units still used them until recently.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This is unironically in Ukraine, it's an old photo of a collection of T-64BVs, T-64Bs, T-64As and T-80s.
      That said, Russians nowadays ain't much better, at least the ukros only kept a few hundred in semi-active reserve instead of this these last years.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Waitaminute....

      Are those the spare barrels for the tanks just left on the ground?

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    is that the same source as the Iraqi WMDs ?

    trusting a Western source is like trusting a israelite

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Reminder: we recovered a large number of WMD'a in Iraq, it's just that the nuclear program didn't exist.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Ok israelite

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Well mein Black person, if they didn't have, let's say, chemical weapons, why did Iraq order artillery that was designed to use Sarin and Mustard Gas?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Jews don't like socialist dictators? Bases israelites.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Cold war artillery shells with no no compounds that were never disposed of are not WMD's you horrible caricature of a man.
        No wonder the world hates your warmongering ass.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Chemical weapons aren't chemical weapons.
          Yeah

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Artillery shells =/= WMD
            Sorry

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        False. A large number of chemical weapons (mostly ancient artillery shells) we discovered. The wmds based on the intel sauce watching The Rock were never recovered.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Isn't that what he just said?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Nope. You may be moronic. See your doctor.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Chemical weapons are wmds

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Nope. But then US definitions are so nebulous that a pressure cooker with black powder sometimes counts as wmds. If you were old enough to remember the build up to Iraq war, zoomer, you’d know that a few, rusted, useless artillery shells were not what was promised.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >UN:"atomic explosive weapons, radioactive material weapons, lethal chemical and biological weapons, and any weapons developed in the future which might have characteristics comparable in destructive effect to those of the atomic bomb or other weapons mentioned above."

              Find me one definition of WMD that excludes chemical weapons

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >US Military
                > Chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapons capable of a high order of destruction or causing mass casualties
                >high order of destruction
                >or causing mass casualties
                Yeah. Unusable scrap doesn’t cut it. Why do you plebbitors do this?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Ok, israelite

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    visually confirmed are 1825 tank losses, this is already quite much

    https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >visually confirmed
      i.e. we paused a video and pretended active tanks are destroyed

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        any example of them doing this

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No. Nearly all oryx seethe is cope.
          Sometimes a Russian shill posts something like that to try and discredit but it's very quickly noticed and taken down in minutes, but so far most if not all are vetted before then.

          The Russian shill fears the open source intelligence.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >muh disinfo
            no one believes censorship is done in good faith fashion
            if people say something that's wrong, and you could prove them wrong, you'd do it publicly to delegitimize their position
            whenever you delete stuff you're giving it credibility.
            you'd think you'd learn that lesson after so many examples

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Removing information you know to be inaccurate from your own website is censorship?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          History Legends talks about it around 12:55

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >History Legends

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              just delete my comments Black person you know you're going to do it eventually.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            does he know the current whereabouts of copelord?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I don't hang out here a lot and your jargon has a learning curve to it
              who is copelord? Lira?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >1. i'm not oryx
                wtf is an oryx
                why do you homosexuals speak in this indescipherable web is moronic slang that only you homosexuals understand
                >2. i'm not going to do your job of looking up the original video to prove whether he miscounted something
                I don't want you to do that
                >the shitty youtuber video you posted proves no such thing since there's no evidence anyone started their count of destroyed tanks at the arbitrary point where he paused before going on to show two of the tanks getting destroyed
                that's fine, trust Globohomo, I don't care.

                the video isn't about pointing out a specific instance, its a common repeated tactic.

                lurk moar

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            ? the footage he's playing itself seems to show the tanks getting abandoned and/or destroyed kek, his argument is that the crew survived so it's not a loss or something

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >please please don't watch it, assume I'm not lying
              lololol
              no he mocks how NATO copers pause video, count "dead" or "damaged" tanks but then you can just unpause the video the damaged tanks are much less

              Of the 4 tanks shown, only one was actually damaged.

              its just an example, no need to get your panties in a knot

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                and once he presses play, at least two of the tanks run into mines right away and we never see what became of the rest so what the hell was the point of pausing it before that

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >at least two of the tanks run into mines right
                just 1
                why would you say "at least" when you're watching a video

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                he seems to skip the explosion but according to his narration another tank seems to get damaged and abandoned at 13:50 and looking at how far those two got it doesn't instill faith in the rest going much further

                >so what the hell was the point of pausing it before that
                to mock you homosexuals and demonstrate your tactics

                so any specific example of oryx using those "tactics"?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >so any specific example of oryx using those "tactics"?
                yeah right here
                >he seems to skip the explosion but according to his narration another tank seems to get damaged and abandoned at 13:50 and looking at how far those two got it doesn't instill faith in the rest going much further

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                1. i'm not oryx and 2. i'm not going to do your job of looking up the original video to prove whether he miscounted something
                the shitty youtuber video you posted proves no such thing since there's no evidence anyone started their count of destroyed tanks at the arbitrary point where he paused before going on to show two of the tanks getting destroyed

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >1. i'm not oryx
                wtf is an oryx
                why do you homosexuals speak in this indescipherable web is moronic slang that only you homosexuals understand
                >2. i'm not going to do your job of looking up the original video to prove whether he miscounted something
                I don't want you to do that
                >the shitty youtuber video you posted proves no such thing since there's no evidence anyone started their count of destroyed tanks at the arbitrary point where he paused before going on to show two of the tanks getting destroyed
                that's fine, trust Globohomo, I don't care.

                the video isn't about pointing out a specific instance, its a common repeated tactic.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the record of visually confirmed losses that this discussion started with

                visually confirmed are 1825 tank losses, this is already quite much

                https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html

                >the video isn't about pointing out a specific instance, its a common repeated tactic.
                any one example, preferably from oryx since they're the ones this whole discussion was about

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                rather than pretending that you need to disprove pro NATO stats, its really this easy, NATO has again and again lied about things small and large, as soon as one side lies a lot, they lose credibility
                ANYTHING pro Nato should be assumed to be a lie until properly demonstrated
                there's no reasons to take anything the pro NATO side says after the Ghost of Kiev

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                oryx isn't nato and yes, if you make an accusation of them pausing videos ahead of time to pretend intact tanks are losses you're going to have to prove it
                i can't think of many nato lies either though
                >there's no reasons to take anything the pro NATO side says after the Ghost of Kiev
                what about starting with "there will be no invasion"
                even the ghost of kyiv was a logical conclusion from trusting russian claims of the ukr airforce being destroyed in the first hours of the invasion, if you took that as a true premise in the initial days then any ukrainian plane sighting after that had to be some kind of lone straggler's last stand

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >in the initial days then any ukrainian plane sighting after that had to be some kind of lone straggler's last stand
                True. It only became utterly-beyond-belief after we learned just how incompetent the Russian Air Force was.

              • 1 year ago
                The sign is a subtle joke. The shop is cal...

                I don't hang out here a lot and your jargon has a learning curve to it
                who is copelord? Lira?

                KWABOunderageB&B, FOAD

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Orchestra
                >Picrel

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >wtf is an oryx

                The guy that is the main cataloger of visually confirmed losses? The one that everyone points to that you're arguing against right now? Why are you trying to argue a point about what someone else does when you don't have any idea who they even are?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I was criticizing the concept of "visually confirmed losses" generally
                I don't follow cope-sources that count gas-tanks destroy and whose methodology is "trust me bro"

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I was criticizing the concept of "visually confirmed losses" generally

                Yeah which is almost sole done by oryx

                >I don't follow cope-sources that count gas-tanks destroy and whose methodology is "trust me bro"

                It's visually confirmed and is attached to an image database for it to be cross checked, it couldn't be soured any better other than actually going to Ukraine and finding the loss on question.

                If you're going to criticize something you should actually look into it rather than just repeat whatever a random youtuber says.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >so what the hell was the point of pausing it before that
                to mock you homosexuals and demonstrate your tactics

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    this just in, i have fricked approximately 2,000 b***hes (source: me)

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >source: kyiv ""independent""
    its like asking a pig about rocket science

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      original source is ukrainian mod

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >vehicles and fuel tanks
    >helicopters
    these are such fricking garbage categories I unironically get a little upset every time I see them

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You can call them "soft-skinned general purpose/ utility/logistical support vehicles" and "rotary-wing aviation assets" if the unnecessary specificity and awkward phrasing makes you feel better.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how long until russians fight with sticks and stones?

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine has started using Turkish cluster ammo.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Source: just trust me, bro.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      saved

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >8 artillery systems

    man i really hope someone is collating all of these, i want a full interactive google maps timeline at the end of the war

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I know that we have to divide by two this numbers but what the frick happened to go back to +1000 again?
    >lurked the catalog for 5 minutes
    oh...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >but what the frick happened to go back to +1000 again?
      Vuhledar and also Bakhmut.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    gb2/gaia/

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >gb2/gaia/
      I have no idea what that means

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Of course you don't, newfriend.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >if they're pumping pro-NATO stats, they're NATO
    i'm waiting on you to prove they're pumping stats with a pro-nato bias
    >I hadn't even heard of Oryx until this thread, if you believe the side that told you about mug snake island that's you
    kek like picrel?
    >who are you alleging said that? Russia has been trying to prevent this conflict since 2014
    the kremlin and russhills swore there wouldnd't be an attack until the day the smo started even as western intelligence was calling the invasion
    backing militant separatists, the green men and finally invasion were very conflict averse
    >it was. Ukraine never had any success with any its airforce at all, again what are you talking about?
    they're flying to this day, however if you took russian lies about the destruction of ukro aviation and anti-air as true then any activity from those would've had to be some kind of lone anomaly (which it wasn't because the russian always lies)

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >if the stats present a positive view from NATO's perspective, it's pro nato

    What will you do when you realize reality presents these stats?
    Oh frick its a Pro-NATO reality

    More seriously though, you're too much of a moron and a homosexual to realize this, but the core of "visual confirmations" of losses in this war come from Oryx, who also takes very seriously claims of mis-identifaction and audits existing counts regularly.

    Pic related is a snapshot of a recent audit based on claims from vatnik telegram channels. If you have any such similar claims, forward them along.
    But you wouldn't know this, nor would you do this, because you are a homosexual moron.
    No (you)s for homosexuals.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >my play is for the lurkers
    You know the rest of us aren't making "plays" right? Like, we're not paid and don't really care who's winning, it's just that reality is clearly telling a story about the Russian military being dysfunctional and incompetent.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Ukraine never had any success with any its airforce at all
    That's because the Russians completely destroyed it all on the first day... and they've destroyed it again since then... several times.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      based and correct pilled

      [...]
      define globohomo

      pic rel

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >can't even define what he is against

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >>can't even define what he is against

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            But it is russian state that enforces homosexuality with gay rapes

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Stop watching porn

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    define globohomo

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      "Globohomo" means whatever "bad" is in their individual minds.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >if the stats present a positive view from NATO's perspective, it's pro nato
    You don't believe in the existence of an objective reality, do you?

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >I don't care to convince a propagandist
    >you cannot convince a man of something his paycheck requires him to not understand.
    >I play for the lurkers
    I'm just here to laugh at Russians and read the funny-type of schizo posting.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >The surname "Rothschild" exists.
    >This means something.
    Boy, we sure do live in a society, don't we anon?

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >i.e. depicting massive casualties on the Russian side.
    visually confirmed, reality is what it is
    >The entire implication of Minsk was that if NATO didn't abide by their side of the agreement there would be a conflict.
    nato? neither the separatists or the ua gov side were able to stop fighting following misk, however especially during zelensky's presidency the ceasefire violations and casualties were declining and the conflict was cooling down until the final separatist spergout that served as pretext to russia's invasion

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    tons of deleted comments
    troony jannies seething

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ooops
    https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/12/01/eu-commission-deletes-references-to-100000-ukrainian-combat-losses-in-presidents-speech/amp/

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why are russian shills so stupid?
    They are pulling 70 year old tin cans from storage. This alone is evidence enough russia ran out of modern equipment.

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    teeeheeeheee*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~))

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *