Only 7 of the 14 Challenger tanks transferred to Ukraine are still combat-capable. >the tanks are unreliable

Only 7 of the 14 Challenger tanks transferred to Ukraine are still combat-capable

>the tanks are unreliable
>five tanks have broken
>there are no specialists
>need to wait for several months for spare parts
>poor mobility
>stuck in the mud all the time

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >shit tank is shit
    woah!

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >too lazy to get the source article from the Sun
    >repeat vatnik telegram instead

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >repeat vatnik telegram instead
      frick you Black person, BTVT is a ukrainian blogger who has devoted his whole life to tanks

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        no matter how much you kiss his ass, you're still too lazy to get the source

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >BTVT is a ukrainian blogger who has devoted his whole life to tanks

        Link plz? Take this cute kitty as an advance payment.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Link plz? Take this cute kitty as an advance payment.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >V-vatnik source
        You're a disingenuous homosexual.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >You're a disingenuous homosexual.
          FRICK OFF
          https://twitter.com/AndreiBtvt

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Doesn't matter. He said a bad thing about western equipment so he's a vatnik.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/KZUlm2C.png

          >You're a disingenuous homosexual.
          FRICK OFF
          https://twitter.com/AndreiBtvt

          Keep crying and shitting for us Armatard. Your tears are not fooling anybody. Instead, everyone is hoping for more storm shadow to be sent. Your cope thread about gun laws got deleted again, even though the /misc/ gun larpers dont even support you due to such unsavory actions?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >repeat vatnik telegram instead
      frick you Black person, BTVT is a ukrainian blogger who has devoted his whole life to tanks

      BTVT isn't a vatnik, far from, it and here's the original article:

      https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/26509818/ukrainian-soldiers-brit-challenger-2-tanks-russia/

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Aww loov the sun mate, tho to be fair its all bin a bit downhill since they took the knockers off page 3 innit. Anyway im going to greggs, does anyone want anything? Reply wiv what you want an ill pick it up
        -Baz from Worcester

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        thanks for the link, it's much better than reading a machine translated summary of it.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    general question: can you chop off blocks of composite armor and applique it to a t72?

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Only 7
    Russians lose 10 tanks per day.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >>Only 7
      >Russians lose 10 tanks per day.
      Russian losses last 24 hours and totals, personnel is Russian killed and does not include wounded
      10.03.2024
      Tanks — 6731 (+19)
      Armored fighting vehicle — 12850 (+27)
      Artillery systems — 10466 (+38)
      MLRS — 1015 (+3)
      Anti-aircraft warfare — 709 (+2)
      Planes — 347
      Helicopters — 325
      UAV — 8082 (+41)
      Cruise missiles — 1919
      Ships (boats) — 26
      Submarines — 1
      vehicles and fuel tankers — 13752 (+69)
      Special equipment — 1672 (+6)
      Military personnel — aprx. 424060 people (+900)

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    A whole seven tanks! In a war!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >A whole seven tanks! In a war!
      no reason to compound the embarrassment with more

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Considering that those comes free of charge, as well as all the other goodies USA and their allies are sending to Ukraine (unless the very expensive and almost irreplaceable shit vantinks are losing on a daily basis) it still seems a very good deal to me.More will be sent as needed, while russia is scraping the barrel, and deploying golf carts lol.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >British engineering
    Is it more reliable than a Range Rover?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Those are Indian now.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Land Rovers used to be pretty reliable before they got designated. There's a reason why ancient Land Rovers are so popular.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    There are actual tanks, and then there are souped up t90s. The challenger is a souped up t90, so is the leopard, so is everything else made without blowout panels.

    The Abrams is the world's only actual tank.
    >inb4 those 3 pics
    Yeah ok, a few eventually got destroyed when they sent it to a giant siege zone Leroy Jenkins style without infantry support. The moronic crew STILL survived instead of being launched in to orbit.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >souped up
      ESL detected, opinion discarded.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        An esl wouldnt understand the meaning of that word

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >ESL detected, opinion discarded.
        dumb fricking moron airmen moment^
        doesnt know what "souped up" means

        so what part of poland are you from?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >this is what passes for intellectual discussion in a land where shitting in the street is acceptable
      Fricking christ how do nonwhites keep from roping themselves...

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No nnnnooooooo you can't just say that noooooooooooooooo they're literally the avengersss

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I remember when our local shill was saying they never get used at all because there was no footage, let's just memoryhole that for now then.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I remember that.
      There seems to be a concerted spamming effort today of various shit threads.
      I heard another A50 was wrecked (on the ground). Funny if true.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >believing the sun
      The truth is they were never used at all, but the rest about having them broken and shellless is true

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    A big heavy vehicle rolling around the fields of Ukraine for a year is going to need servicing, that's just the laws of physics.
    If only they could have maximized their operational window with that whole counteroffensive thing.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >ctrl+f warrior
    >0 results

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      rent free

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >drone producer
    Why would a drone producer say this???
    Could there be an alternate motive??
    hmmm

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It'll be a challenge to effectively use those thanks.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    it is, as mentioned at the start of the post in OPs pic. Learn to read moron

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it might be shit but it's still the coolest looking tank

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >western warfighting tactics are outdated
    No offense to the man, I know he's fighting as hard as he can with what he has, but Ukraine does not employ western warfighting tactics. Not just because their force integration is poor, not just because they do not know how to coordinate units at a platoon level, but because they basically don't have an air force.

    The US fought the war Ukraine is fighting now in the 80s. They did it with older technology a planet away against a belligerent with a superior army that was well-equipped and battle-hardened. The lesson of that war is aircraft are God. I sincerely wish we had a more aggressive government that would properly leverage our aircraft in this conflict. Our pilots could use the live-fire training for the future war with China. Simulations are nice, actual killing is better.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >but because they basically don't have an air force
      Bitch, give us the air force, motherfricker, give us the air force, come and fly here, b***h, show us what you got. stop fricking around. You got airplanes and pilots? Just send them here, you fricking homosexual. why can't you show strength, you fricking nato homosexual, frick you.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        For what benefit?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >not just because they do not know how to coordinate units at a platoon level
      why would you concentrate forces when this entire war is defined by drones+artillery killing mass concentrations you moron? ukraine also doesnt have air superiority

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >platoon level coordination
        of force
        are you joking? it's literally the smallest unit of organization

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I am more interested in the Ammo situation when it comes to the Chally since it uses Three piece ammo for some fricking reason
    and thats ignoring the complication with APFSDS and rifled barrels which just increases the problem further
    They really went balls to the walls when it came to ignoring all Nato Standards and Britain isnt exactly a Shell production power house especially considering the state that their tank fleet is in which may be considered even worst than germanies

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why do you randomly capitalize certain words for no reason?
      And then write 'germanies'?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Why do you randomly capitalize certain words for no reason?
        because I am a ESL german

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I see.
          Opinion disregarded then.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            well frick you too then

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >ESL
          wtf does that even stand for

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            E-Sports League.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Extremely Stupid Lawyer

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'm surprised it's that many. It's been a year now and it's a small tank fleet at the best of times.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What a poor combat record. 50% losses is vatnik levels of bad

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Sorry you have to hear this but bong shit is still shit

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >>your source is invalid
    yes, actually, vatBlack person telegrams are so untrustworthy that you're better off believing the exact opposite of anything they say

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >itt, morons on twatter realise that tanks need maintenance and repairs
    50% avaiability rate during high-intensity operations is downright good. Way better than any russian gabrage can, I'd wager.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >high-intensity operations
      May we see them?
      Unlike Leo, Challenger has not been involved in the summer offensive, and Ukraine didn't really have any serious tank operations since then.
      Pretty sure the one and only piece of combat footage involving Chally had it on fire.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >for no reason
    You know what was the reason you fake posting curry smelling shit eating shill

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >not enough spare leopard 2s
    >Not enough challengers or Leclercs all together
    >Enough Abrams sitting in storage, however the US is completely unreliable for support even if they do send them.

    Not looking great on the tank side.

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >14
    wtf are they supposed to do with 14 fricking tanks on a 1000km front? fricking useless support they're getting. there are hundreds of MBTs collecting dust in the west

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Especially underpowered shit tanks

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >wtf are they supposed to do with 14 fricking tanks
      That's a whole company worth of tanks with spare units to boot.
      Fricking war tourists I swear.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Well they haven’t done shit with them so it’s a fair question.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It's not even a question, it's just a moron showing he knows jack shit about the topic at hand. It was always clear that Ukraine wouldn't have unified logistics and identical equipment across the whole front. And why send 14 specifically? Because they are supposed to equip a single company with them. That's why bongs sent a dozen plus spares instead of, say, 6 or 25. More is always better but as long as you have unified equipment and logistics for a single company/battalion it's fine.

          Ukies they have done plenty with them. Now, the problem is that 2 spares wasn't enough. It has proven delicate compared to many other western assets ukies have gotten, but it still removes Z and is leagues above any soviet equipment.

          TL;DR
          >“Thank you, Britain, for sending them.
          >“Please, if you can, send more.”

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Ukies they have done plenty with them.
            May we see

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You say plenty of spare parts but they’re waiting months for parts to repair the 5 broken down ones. A single tank company with two spares isn’t going to be able to do much in attritional warfare over six months. They can’t commit their seven remaining to anything other than long range support because they can’t replace and they’re running a half strength company.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >You say plenty of spare parts
              Frickoff moron, he literally said the opposite.
              >>the problem is that 2 spares wasn't enough

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >ukies they have done plenty with them
            may we see the proof?

            >You say plenty of spare parts
            Frickoff moron, he literally said the opposite.
            >>the problem is that 2 spares wasn't enough

            no he didnt homosexual

            >wtf are they supposed to do with 14 fricking tanks
            That's a whole company worth of tanks with spare units to boot.
            Fricking war tourists I swear.

            >That's a whole company worth of tanks with spare units to boot.
            it was directly implied there
            >"was an entire outfit of tanks, so much so, they even had spares"
            then it devolved into
            >"we have spares, but the spares werent enough spares you see"
            cope when his shit moronic boasting about the shit terrible bong tank was called out

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Warriortard, why are always such a homosexual?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It’s not warriortards fault that 7 of the 14 challengers are not currently operational.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Are you OP?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          No

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >replies within 25 seconds
            Go frick yourself, warriortard.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              You are insane

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >insult that is nothing but a projection
                And i already know how this will end: The alledged bystander that totally isn't warriortard *wink* *wink* will fight tooth and nail for the next 3 hours with anyone saying anything even remotely negative about warriortard.
                Yeah, never seen that uncanny horse shit before.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Thats because bongs (there are presumably multiple of you, because if its just you replying all the time it would be very sad) take the indefensible position (X shit bong equipment is actually ...le not shit!) and insist on having the last word even when everything has been said. Thats how (you) are consistently able to get in long chain arguments with random people, and because its a problem that lies with you, you think its one person responding.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >you must all be bongs
                There are two posibilities here: You are either the schizo warriortard or you hop in to defend the schizo warriortard. You think this will get you any praise or sympathy?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >X shit bong equipment is actually ...le not shit!
                Ever considered this happens because it is just the simple truth and when warriortard decides to make the mirror opposite of this the OP of multiple threads almost every day this wouldn't create any counterreaction? That he's at it for years by now and usually does it in a very disingenious way is just the cherry on top. Clearly no one could take offense in this. Of course it must be some grande conspiracy by brits.
                >insist on having the last word even when everything has been said.
                Again, warriortard is way worse at this in all aspects when it comes to that. No word of that from you, not even mentioning how much he samegays, falseflags, etc.
                You are so close to the truth and then you botch it by applying what you know completely wrong and turning the whole thing on its head in the process.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I am convinced that the guy complaining about warriortard is just some weird American schizophrenic, and there is no such thing as warriortard.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >American
                Nope seems absolutely British. Defends their food and can’t post guns

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                This "person who complains about warriortard" is half the board. You can't shill the board with the same shitty threads full of yoir samegayging for two years and not get people hating you.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        No

        Since you aren't warriortard, what is your opinion on him? And what caused your unnatural reaction to a schizo getting shat on?

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    how many of the BMPTs are still combat-capable

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Uh huh. You go and fight a massive high-intensity war for months on end and take a look at the state of your tank force at that point, moron.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Instead of always trying to damage control, why don't bongs just, idk; not produce shit? Seems like the better long term solution instead of seething all the time whenever someone points out the emperor has no clothes.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It happened again!

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    > 7 "DESTROYED!!!!"
    2 repaired
    1 assigned as a training vehicle
    1 got its paint chipped by a lanclette

    So, what we're looking at here is three Challenger 2s out of 14 that were damaged so much they seem permanently non-combat capable. In an entire year of service in a brutal war.

    Go sniff your fricking poofinger and take your fricking slide threads leave, (You) fricking Black person.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Not even 3, from the sun article it's 1 destroyed beyond repair. 1 sent to a training unit then 2 seriously damaged and repaired.

      There are 5 awaiting spare parts from the UK, so of the original 14 sent 7 are currently combat capable in that unit, 5 are awaiting minor repairs due to a spare part bottleneck, 1 is working but no longer in that unit and only 1 is actually a total write-off which is the one that hit a mine and got spammed here a few months ago.

      Of course the resident fart Huffer will try and spam this as somehow the fall of western civilization, but that's just his schizoid shill nature. Most people are capable of ignoring him.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >parts bottleneck
        >for 14 tanks
        >minor repairs please believe
        Desperate

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >incapable of reading a short article, comprehending details and drawing logical conclusions
          extremely brown behaviour, if not in skin then certainly in spirit.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >you’re brown
            A parts bottleneck for 14 tanks is unacceptable

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Without question

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Without question

              The bottlneck is sending and applyling the repairs over 2600 km outside of the regular NATO logistics structure, moron. Your attempts to phonepost samegay are laughable by the way armatard.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                He's a bit pissy about being called a kiss less virgin in the CV90 thread...
                😀

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Sounds about right lmao, explains why he's being even more autistic and deluded than usual in this one.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                having an "airmen moment" = having a "woman moment"
                Example?
                >hurrrr durrrrr unknown technology! blyat! nafo-meme.jpg
                >Ruzzia cannot into pallets+logistics, the mighty uber-wunderwaffe from HATO
                here we are 3years into Putin's 48hr brunch in keev, and now
                >uk cant supply fricking 7 tanks, for two weeks worth of "combat"
                lmfao, all of a sudden

                >The bottlneck is sending and applyling the repairs over 2600 km outside of the regular NATO logistics structure, moron
                airmen moment™^

                its probably time for another 'message discapline' stand-up meeting before the next power-point presentation monday morning

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Uh oh here comes the cope train

    The country you're shilling for is losing to Ukraine.

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bong kit getting more bad pr

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This was rather predictable.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This guy was more delusional than Jihadi Julian, David Axewound and the Institute for the Study of Cope, put together

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I don’t care about your opinion on reporters.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I don't care about your opinion on my opinion on reporters.

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Even when he said he can do whatever he wants with impunity and the mods can't ban him, but then mods put an end to it and he shut up saying it?

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'm demoralized
    We should hand over Boris Johnson to interpol, and negotiate unconditional surrender of HATO to based tsar Putin
    I'm John Smith from Amazon Police

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The real joke is that they only sent 14 tanks of that type. Anyone can see logistics will be terrible at that scale.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >The real joke is that they only sent 14 tanks of that type
      It was a political move, breaking a taboo and showing everyone that there would be no noooks in response to sending METAL BAWXES.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >breaking a taboo
        This means absolutely nothing

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >REEEEEEEEEEEEE

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >This means absolutely nothing
          Anon, you're either interested in knowledge or drama.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Someone said 14 tanks was nothing and I’m replying to the guy who said it was some kind of taboo thing

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              At that time, there was a taboo about sending armor as it was considered a potential "escalation" that would result in "conflagration". By demonstrating that it was neither Boris set the stage for meaningful transfers of modern tanks.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Not at all. People just sent tanks when they wanted to. Have you really been holding on to that bit of pomp for all of this time? Holy shit that’s funny

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Have you really been holding on to that bit of pomp for all of this time?
                Why would I?

                >People just sent tanks when they wanted to
                >Britain to send 14 of its main battle tanks to Ukraine
                >Jan 15, 2023
                >Ukrainians to Get U.S. Tanks by Fall
                >March 21, 2023
                >Ukraine war: Germany sends much-awaited Leopard tanks
                >28 March 2023
                Prior to that it was only soviet-era surplus, or modernized soviet surplus. It was a political move, nothing more.

                Knowledge has been provided, but it seems your only interested in drama
                >Have you really been holding on to that bit of pomp for all of this time? Holy shit that’s funny

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah they sent a handful of tanks first, this is absolutely not in question. Did you think this was noteworthy? Did you think No tanks would have been sent if the UK didn’t send 14 tanks?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Nta, but holy shit, just tell us where the anglos have touched you or your mom.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Did you think No tanks would have been sent if the UK didn’t send 14 tanks?
                probably.

                [...]
                [...]
                What kind of post is this? The dude didn’t answer you for a few minutes and you have to re-reply. Strange behavior

                Did you just out yourself for samegayging because two of those posts are my posts responding to, what i thought, were two different anons.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You are delusional. I am in awe of this subset of poster that seems to have created a narrative around foreign tank aid. Baffling

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                If you're criticism is "you recall a period of time in the past" then consider me critiqued.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                No I’m directly referring to your statement that if the UK didn’t send 14 tanks then no one would have sent tanks. You’re passing off your interpretation of it as fact

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >No I’m directly referring to your statement that if the UK didn’t send 14 tanks then no one would have sent tanks
                This is the realm of speculation.

                >You’re passing off your interpretation of it as fact
                I'm recalling what happened. I didnt say no one would do it, I said that at that time no one was prepared to do it so they did it as a political move.

                Seems you're here for the drama, perchance human interaction is a facet of life that you have in short supply.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Your inability to process what people mean and attempts to twist what was said is not an argument nor ever was one, warriortard. Not even that anon.
                You are a bit of a Cathy Newman when it comes to that whole thing.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >warriortard
                Why is this always the go to response with these people

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                post guns.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Why would I when you couldn’t?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Please, I insist: After you.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I don’t own any guns. I’m not sure what that has to do with the thread topic.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Why would I when you couldn’t?

                I don’t own any guns. I’m not sure what that has to do with the thread topic.

                >I don’t own any guns

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yes why would I post guns in an unrelated thread when you couldn’t post guns despite being the one to bring them up

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Yes why would I post guns
                Because, as you just said, you have none?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Correct.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >why can people recogise one of the biggest lolcows and schizoid posters on this board who plagues the board for many hours almost every day
                Truely a mystery.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >You are delusional.
                Look who is talking.
                >I am in awe of this subset of poster that seems to have created a narrative around foreign tank aid.
                You say this while you are pretty much alone with that opinion and act like the whole thing is personal for you.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I didn’t realize I was talking to the collective consciousness of /k/

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Well, i on the other hand realized a long time ago i'm talking to schizo that takes great offense when anyone has a opinion that diverts from his own.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                see

                Warriortard, why are always such a homosexual?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                ah yes, it's the "escalation" that medvedev likes to trot out that is promptly memory-holed by vatniks when the next red line is breached.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >when the next red line is breached.
                The russian red lines are so overused and blurry they started to look like pink lines.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                bingo. I remember the time quite well, there was much pearl clutching and hand-wringing in the West about sending modern tanks. But then the Brits did it and everyone realized Putin isnt going to end the world because of some METAL BAWXES. Ironically, quite recently some interal docs got leaked that show what their actual Red-lines for a strike are: the loss of 3/4 their cruisers, the loss of 1/3 their boomers etc.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >The real joke is that they only sent 14 tanks of that type
                It was a political move, breaking a taboo and showing everyone that there would be no noooks in response to sending METAL BAWXES.

                see [...]

                What kind of post is this? The dude didn’t answer you for a few minutes and you have to re-reply. Strange behavior

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >schizo rambling
                Weird flex, but okay.

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >the tanks are unreliable
    >when the spare parts have to travel very far and there is a lack of trained mechanics since Ukraine is very VERY hastily bringing them into action
    It's a fricking nothingburger

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >nothingburger
      Ukies have Issues with getting Spare Parts for their Leo 2s too but atleast they didnt call it having serious reliability issues or have shit Mobility

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >warriortard damage control intensifies

  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why does this current conversation sound so much like warriortard talking to himself to opt out of the discussion from before?
    Maybe it is because that is exactly what happens.

  42. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The Brits are well known for their engineering just like their cooking.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Sheppard's pie
      >fish and chips
      >full English
      You own a passport right?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        kek what is this bong doing vehemently defending the crown at like 5 am

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >kek what is this bong doing vehemently defending the crown at like 5 am
          The question about owning a passport was a clue. You should save up and go sometime. Great place.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            New low for you

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >New low for you
              International travel?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        If those foods are Britain's best then I feel sorry for them.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >I feel sorry for them because their most notable meals are comfort foods
          I very seriously doubt you're American

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            3, they have 3 notable meals that they pull out anytime their food gets critized. It's pathetic. Am I supposed to be amazed that they can fry fish, make some eggs and beans, and cover some ground meat in potatoes?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >their food is shit
              >here are three globally known meals
              >is this supposed to impress me
              Nah, the point is to make you look like the assblasted clown that you are.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I am not the one who said it was shit. I just said that it wasn't impressive. Maybe take the limey wiener out of your mouth so you can think straight?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >nta

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That's correct. Now keep coping britcuck and tell me all about how jellied eels are the epitome of gastronomy.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >That's correct.
                Post guns.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                you knoe the rules

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                And so do I.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >frickin suck
                >subsequently Sneed's

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                bump

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I see dog bowls. Clean dog bowls.
                Dog on a diet? Or dog dead from heart attack?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >post guns
                >he posts guns
                >but those dog bowls are clean!
                ????

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                My dog eats twice a day, I don't just leave food in his bowl like a moron so he can get fat as frick.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >I don't just leave food in his bowl like a moron so he can get fat as frick.
                That's wise. Letting a dog get fat as frick is abuse. It's not just the years it takes off their lives, it put pressure on their hips and knees. Poor little guys can end up needed serious surgery. Or dying prematurely from a heart attack ;_;

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yes exactly, also he is a dachsund so being overweight is even more of a problem. He gets a half cup of food in the morning and a half cup at night to keep him at a good weight. I guess some dipshits think you should let your animals eat themselves to death.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >he is a dachsund
                Why do you have a raised bowl then?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Recommendation from the vet. It is only a few inches off the ground so he doesn't have to bend his head all the way down to get the food.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That's more than a few inches. Also, with his front end raised, and his back end lower, he'd have to bend his head lower to get to food.
                Are you sure your not... full of shit?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Nah

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Post dog with timestamp.
                I want to see the cute little guy.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That is cute. Though I have never seen a long haired Dachshund. Is it a mongrel cross of some sort?
                Almost looks like a spaniel.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Dachshunds come in three coats. Smooth, long, and wire.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Ah, similar to Labradors. Cool.
                Thanks for the education Anon.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I didn't realize lab's had different coats. We both learned something today.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Post dashsund with timestamp.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Warriortard you are as using your dog

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >esl schizo ramblings

  43. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Fais-le

  44. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It does not mean they are broken down, they just don't have enough shells for 14 tanks but only for 7.

  45. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    bongshit is worse than krautshit??
    a humiliation for the island monkeys with foul breath!

  46. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Warriortard used to annoy me. And that's his reason to live.
    He's been mocked openly on any site that does not allow anonymity. Whether it be wikipedia, touhou chat rooms (his favourite retro game), twitter, etc, etc...
    He's not lying when he says he loves this place. And this is the point.
    Anytime he annoys you, do something you enjoy. Go plinking, call the lads and do some lamping, take your wife/gf out for meal. In short, do the things he can't, and never will. Don't let yourself become the sad, lonely, individual who has made ragebaiting his life.

    tl:dr dubs decides what the British did to him.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Allowed his weapons grade autism to alienate the only woman who could put up with.
      After she left, he spiraled into a depressive rage. Rather than analyzing his own actions, he decided "somehow the British are to blame".
      Simple as.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They invaded his country. Installed democracy, roads, railways, schools, toilets...
      Then left.

  47. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    ...woah, I thought russia was weak because they are driving literal golf carts into battle, but they are actually very strong...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Crimean war?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Crimean war?

      Don't tell her

  48. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >50% attrition rate
    Grim

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That’s pretty high, no?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It’s unsustainable

  49. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Oh. Here we go.
    Already started talking to himself.
    What is it in that pasta that breaks you so bad I wonder?

  50. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They should have sent warrior to fight alongside it. They were designed to support eachother, and when these two awful AFVs are side by side they are equivalent to the Bradley Abrams duo.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know what it is, maybe it's the Soviet heritage, but they seem to either send single tanks for probing attacks, or entire convoys that get ambushed, and destroyed/disabled.

      Russia is bad for it, I hoped some of the training Ukraine got over the last 2 years would have changed their approach, but it hasn't

  51. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Virgin chally be like
    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/26509818/ukrainian-soldiers-brit-challenger-2-tanks-russia/
    >one which was destroyed by a Lancet suicide drone in September — luckily the crew survived and the tank’s burnt-out hull was recovered

    Meanwhile chad CV90
    https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/cv9040_is_the_deadliest_ifv_against_russians_soldiers_of_ukrainian_21st_mech_brigade_about_the_swedish_combat_vehicle-9657.html
    >The armor is very robust, it withstood the frontal [hits by] Lancets, FPVs, and when a 120mm hit in the "a*s," it withstood, basically.

    Bork IFVs outtanking bong MBTs

  52. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Classic British Leyland reliability.

  53. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    british tanks were already shown to be trash in the iran-iraq war

  54. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Very typical of Russian propaganda to cite a 3rd party source and then not link to the source. Mostly because the source is made up or they didn't say what the Russian propaganda says.

  55. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    This your problem. Well, one of your problems, projection.
    Just because, you spend your time talking to yourself, doesn't mean other people do.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah that exchange was absolutely one person, most likely using 2 devices.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Nope. Wrong again virgin.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Have you considered that just because you are nearly always alone in your terrible takes doesn't mean that you're always screeching against a single person as well? This might be a low traffic board, but you shouldn't be surprised when more than one person is here to call out your horseshit, especially on a Sunday when real people aren't working. Of course, you don't know about real work, do you?

  56. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    more projection from the armatard. I guess the programme finally getting put out of its misery broke you

  57. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    a British person in a thread about British equipment, say it ain't so! Heaven forbid I have a bit of fun calling armatard out on his horseshit.

  58. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why not put some of this energy into getting a girlfriend?
    I mean, if you managed to get laid, you might not be such a bell end. (might not)

  59. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >more zigger fakes and spam
    Frick off Armatard, this behavior is why everyone fricking hates Russia. You didn’t post anything interesting to the board with this spams. instead you could have posted one of thousands of destroyed Russian equipments instead of embarrassing yourself by seething about the UK on a pro UK board. TZD. nobody wants to see this shit. Frick you.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You should learn some respect.
      He'll come round your house with all his imaginary friends and lecture you about 'firing on the move'..
      LMAO

  60. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I mean it's much better than a T-64 or T-72 but it's the worst western MBT and 14 tanks isn't much.

  61. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >more like Challenged

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Armatard samegayging agaij
      Why do vatniks ALWAYS seethe about the United Kingdom? Russia has the worlds biggest insecurity complex because you have historically lost to a tiny island? You can always kys vanya if not having your empire any more is such the kicker…

  62. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Seems like the bongs and Russians are both very insecure
    You spend your life on here. Talking to yourself.
    And you want to declare other people insecure?
    Seriously. Save some of the money you spend on pay-as-you-go sims and go see a hooker.
    Hell, go see a troony hooker if that's your thing.
    But stop making your sexless, sad existence, everyone else's problem.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      How is it even possible for you to be cyber bullied so hard? Hahahaha homie Just Walk Away From The Screen Like homie Close Your Eyes Haha

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Real curious how any could want to hear your latest brain farts about challenger tanks and others who bullied you, and created this crying mess for everyone to mocked you and Russia after all. Yeah, real curious. It’s not like any believed you or followed these inorganic threads, long knowing your antics.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Warriortard really didn't like this post.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yup. If I were to call him "An early 19th century steam locomotive", he wouldn't care. Because it isn't true.
        Say he's 'never been touched by a women', and he cries himself to sleep.
        Truth hurts more than lies.

  63. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >can’t handle criticism
    You are yet to criticize me.
    Don't conflate your wizardhood with other people hating your existence.

  64. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    How is it even possible for you to be cyber bullied so hard? Hahahaha homie Just Walk Away From The Screen Like homie Close Your Eyes Haha

    >post guns
    >he posts guns
    >but those dog bowls are clean!
    ????

    Come on now virgin. I don't know if you were bullied too much or too little, but you need to understand people are not as moronic as you.
    Your sad posts stand out.
    Try tinder at least. You might get lucky.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This. They always put themselves as the lowest credibility poster by talking to themselves. Everyone sees a seethe thread about the UK, and knows. It’s just Armatard talking to himself again as if any would notice or be fooled by it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Bad narrative build attempt

  65. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Challenger can't survive a Lancet hit
    Lmao. What the frick.

  66. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Ultimately they're both suicidal post-communist hellholes desperately pretending to still be relevant so it's not surprising that they hate each other so much.

  67. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That attrition rate is alarming

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      LMAO
      You are incapable of learning.
      Loser.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I just want to applaud this guy for diligently monitoring the thread and replying to slights within a minute.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You always take the greatest offense when someone does something similar to you, even when it is just by accident. Deep down you know how unhinged your own actions are, now act that way.

  68. 1 month ago
    MaHdicK

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1766916194882236825

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *