Nuclear option???

What nuclear weapons could be stored so close to the border?
What capabilities Ukraine can get if they succeed in this operation?
Could even anything be there in the first place?
Are there historic precedents of country becoming a nuclear power via the gypsiean means?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >RUSH NUKES

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nuke Belgorod! Only based option, it's full of vatniks and unusable land

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It would be really funny if Ukraine actually gained access to a Nuke during this war

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it would be the single largest victory in recorded history

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it would be the single largest victory in recorded history

      Just owning a nuke and actually being able to perform a nuclear strike are very different things

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Them taking a non functional nuke is even funnier

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      <<This twisted game needs reset>>

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        <<We'll start over from "Zero" with this V2 and entrust the future to the next generation.>>

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sadly, none whatsoever. They will open the bunkers with bated breath, but a brief inspection of the "weapons" stored at this facility will soon reveal them to be completely non-functional.

    You know, like the other ones.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe it's where russians decided to store the orb of pisskey and ukies decided to get their hold back onto it

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That doesn't matter, Russia will never reveal that they don't work so Ukraine has the option of claiming to have functional nukes if they want to.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    fuck around and learn how you talk and then youwill see

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >village storage of nuclear weapons
    Is this a common feature in Russian villages?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      On the border, yes.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well, they had modernized BUKs stored in Donbabwean sheds

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, they are kept among the serfs far from important people of moscow and st peter

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Most nuclear silos are in the middle of nowhere anon.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think Ukraine would be stupid enough to throw away all of the goodwill they've built up by actually using a nuke

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But having that card in their deck is extremely valuable nonetheless

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      maybe not using, but promising to use. I wonder how all retards screaming "GIVE RUSSIA EVERYTHING THEY WANT BECAUSE THEY HAVE NUKES AND IM SCARED" will talk now.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah i don't even know how the allies would react to them stealing the nukes for deterrence let alone use the damn thing.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >i don't even know how the allies would react to them stealing the nukes
        Laughter I guess.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Wait ... you're saying that we can laugh even harder than we are already?

          I'm going to have to get a better medical insurance policy I want to live long enough to see the end of this timeline.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Capture nuke
        >Give it to NATO
        Win win

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I don't know how to break this to you, but NATO already had nukes.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What do you mean? Ukraine isn't a nuclear state, the disarmament was witnessed and confirmed by international observers. We have nothing to do with whatever nuclear accident happened in Russia, you know how shitty their maintenance is it was bound to happen eventually. Isotopic examination of the fallout proves that the nuclear material came from Russian reactors, our hands are clean and we hope no civilians were injured.
      Russia would be wise to cease their expensive, aggressive war and focus their limited funding on maintaining their unstable nuclear arsenal, who knows how many more horrible accidents could happen in major Russian cities until they do?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Isotopic examination of the fallout proves that the nuclear material came from Russian reactors
        this is the most hilarious part, if this shit about them still having tactical nuclear artillery was true, the russian separatists could probably get away with putting one smack dab in the middle of belgorod as basically nobody outside of intelligence officials or nuclear autists would even know that's still a thing, let alone located that close to the border.
        it's like if someone suddenly began to randomly shoot police in your area, then someone told you they thought it was your neighbor doing it. you never thought your neighbor was a violent person, let alone that he had 12 rifles in his basement and was a bloodthirsty murderer, and you're not likely to believe it even if you see the cops hauling him out the next day. the narrative of "those ukrainians stole our own nukes and used them on us" is so comically outlandish nobody will believe it.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You can't use a nuke you stole, unless you intend to use it as a dirty bomb.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >You can't use a nuke you stole
        you just have to moronrig the explosives

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You're not going to get the timings right unless you are an actual professional. The best they could even hope for is a partial detonation that spreads the majority of the fissile material around.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm sure if Ukraine actually captured a nuke and wanted to use it they have physicists and engineers that can do it? Especially considering that just iver 30 years ago Ukraine was a part of the Soviet Union where the nukes were made.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Anon, they've been maintaining russian nukes even post-2014. As in Russia doesn't have the technological capability to do so. Ukies do.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >unless you are an actual professional

            Reminder that a sizeable portion of soviet nuclear technicians and scientists were ukrainian. In fact, Ukrainians actually kept being hired by the Russians to maintain their nukes up until 2014.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The hard part of making a nuke is getting the fissile material and shaping the explosive lenses, in the modern day the electronics controlling the detonation are pretty trivially simple. Could easily capture, disassemble, rebuild.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You are now aware the Ukraine used to produce, use and/or service several Soviet/Russian nuclear delivery platforms.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Dirty bomb in the center of Moscow or Piter sounds pretty appealing. And you won't ever prove it was me.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >You can't use a nuke you stole
        I think you overestimate the complexity and competence of any controls russia would have on their tactical warheads.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >That book
          Nightmare fuel, is what that is.

          "So what's the chance one of these goes off on accident? Like a full-scale detonation."
          "Well, if we keep handling them, loading, unloading, transporting, etc. over the next 50 years.... For an H-bomb, about 1 in 20."
          "And a garden-variety A-bomb?"
          "Just about a hundred percent."

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >That book
          Nightmare fuel, is what that is.

          "So what's the chance one of these goes off on accident? Like a full-scale detonation."
          "Well, if we keep handling them, loading, unloading, transporting, etc. over the next 50 years.... For an H-bomb, about 1 in 20."
          "And a garden-variety A-bomb?"
          "Just about a hundred percent."

          Looks intriguing. Is there a download for this?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why would you think they'd use the nuke? They had to disarm themselves and it caused them to be invaded so it stands to reason if they keep nukes on them now Putin starts getting worried and it gives them leverage to get Russia to go away. Even if they don't touch the nukes outside of rolling them into Ukraine it sends a message that they now have them.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What do you mean? Ukraine isn't a nuclear state, the disarmament was witnessed and confirmed by international observers. We have nothing to do with whatever nuclear accident happened in Russia, you know how shitty their maintenance is it was bound to happen eventually. Isotopic examination of the fallout proves that the nuclear material came from Russian reactors, our hands are clean and we hope no civilians were injured.
      Russia would be wise to cease their expensive, aggressive war and focus their limited funding on maintaining their unstable nuclear arsenal, who knows how many more horrible accidents could happen in major Russian cities until they do?

      You can't use a nuke you stole, unless you intend to use it as a dirty bomb.

      They don't want to use the nuke. The Ukrainians have conscripted Romanian volunteers into a special force with the Objective of stealing every Nuclear weapon in Russia, so that NATO can rush Moscow without issues while China and Japan reclaim their lost territories.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Also, guys, consider the following :
    > ukraine captures functioning nuclear shell
    > moron rigs it to sneed shadow
    > nukes the fuck out of crimean bridge or some russian nuclear facility or even fucking kremlin

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >LIVE AZOV REACTION

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >russian rebels get their hands on a nuke
      Moscow is gonna blow, I'm willing to bet money on it

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >nukes the fuck out of crimean bridge
      Ukraine isn't Belka in this war

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And these aren't Ukrainians.
        The Free Russian Legion will restore the honor of The Motherland.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >functioning
      That'll be the hardest part of the operation considering the state of everything else in the russian inventory.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Thread theme: https://youtu.be/y8VfziFZMGY

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      LET THE WORLD MOCK US ALL
      ITS HOW IT SHOULD END

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You now remember that Russia pulled guards in charge of protecting the nukes to send more troops to Ukraine

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    there is no fucking way that nukes are there , and if there are there is no fucking way ukraine manages to capture one , and even if then they won t use it as nuclear blackmail to end the war a day later .
    this is not a fucking manga guys

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >this is not a fucking manga guys
      manga characters also say this all the time

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Or is it

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Anime Prighozin? Post more if you have it

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > they won t use it as nuclear blackmail to end the war a day later
      I agree, see

      Also, guys, consider the following :
      > ukraine captures functioning nuclear shell
      > moron rigs it to sneed shadow
      > nukes the fuck out of crimean bridge or some russian nuclear facility or even fucking kremlin

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >this is not a fucking manga guys
      My dude, we're just starting the arc where the Vlasov Army comes back from the dead and begins liberating Russia from soviet glowmorons. Anything is possible.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >no fucking way ukraine manages to capture one
      Dudeanon, there is a small convey of Ukrainian farm equipment en route as we speak, manned by Gypsies seeking scrap metal.

      Yeah. Fucking way.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Hispanicy scrap metal that makes the guy in yellow rubber hazmat suit look somewhat concerned.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >this is not a fucking manga guys
      Exactly, fiction has to make sense and be believable, reality is not limited by such constraints.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Russia doesn't actually have functioning nuclear weapons. They're safe.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >blow out my birthday candles
    >see this
    truly a gift from god

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      happy birthday anon!

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      happy birthday, anon!

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You picked a helluva wish.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >National-level storage facilities
    >Belgorod-22 Object 1150, Golovchino 25624 - 50°33'47"N 35°44'9"E
    >Associated with:
    >Morozovsk, Unit 55796 (AF: tactical aviation)
    >Novorossiysk, Unit 52522 (N: Black Sea Fleet)

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    chances of nukes being still stored there are increasing

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      do it, you mad lads, capture the lot and come back home

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't belive it but I want it to be true.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        same. I wonder if any of it is actually true anot not a psy-op of a nuclear scale. Still most fun I've had on months.
        t. ukie

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >not only did they not remove all their nuclear weapons from an active warzone, they brought in more

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Lose Bakhmut
      >Gain Tactical nuke.

      SON OF A BEETCH
      They will technically end this war in one move

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The longer this goes on the more it becomes like a videogame or action movie plot.

        And it is really fucking hard to remain prefessional and somber about the whole thing.
        All those stories about the 2nd Pacifi Fleet etc suddenly start to make sense.

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's a storage for tactical nukes, I think

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well, see

      Also, guys, consider the following :
      > ukraine captures functioning nuclear shell
      > moron rigs it to sneed shadow
      > nukes the fuck out of crimean bridge or some russian nuclear facility or even fucking kremlin

      even if they capture nothing but cruise missiles, it's a huge win

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    pyfw the Free Belgorod Republic becomes a nuclear power nation on its first day of existance

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ace combat is becoming real

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    HO-LEE-SHIT
    turns out, nukes actually were stored there.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The nukes were actually still there.

      Someone's gonna fall out of a window for this.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >potential to go from wunderwaffen to atomwaffen in a single day
      just do it™

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Eyebrow status ?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      See
      Even vatniks aren't retarded enough to let one of their nukes get captured. If Ukrainian forces get anywhere near where a nuke is being kept or Russia even suspects they might have SF in the area that shit is getting moved.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ...
        Anon, I...
        The mind-blowing incompetence we have seen so far is only the tip of the shitburg.
        Google Project Sapphire.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Anon, they already took that base. We'll know if it had nukes in a few hours

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Both parties have incentives to deny Ukraine's capture of nukes.
        Russia wants to save face and would deny it even if ukies livestream their operation "cheeky snatch". Just like thry do with everything else.
        Ukraine, on the other hand, has incentives to keep strategic ambiguity about the situation : "we don't have nukes bt we'll use em if we need to"
        Also, do you think they always keep vehicles there, prepared for emergency evacuation? Do you think they can successfully do everything in a span of couple hours, even before monke got notified? Do you trust them not to paint capture of nukes as "evacuation"?
        Think carefully, moskva initially didn't sank too.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Stupidity of this magnitude should just collapse and form a stupidity singularity.

      I just don't know anymore, man.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I think that's what we're witnessing. There's some sort of spacetime distortion around the area of the SMO that ensures that the stupidest course of events always happens.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The nukes probably don't work but you could still make a dirty bomb out of them.

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Our so-called leaders prostituted us to the east
    >...Destroyed our culture
    >...Our economies...
    >Our honor.
    >Our blood has been spilled on our soil.
    >My blood... On their hands.
    >They are the invaders
    >All Putinist and Kadyrovite forces will leave Russia immediately
    >...Or suffer the consequences...

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    do you really think they know where their nukes are

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Russian roulette with nukes.
      Is the rocket nuclear or nothing? Even we don't know!

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If 'Object 1150' was about to be compromised, do you think remaining security forces would martyr themselves and detonate a nuke on site to prevent anything from getting captured?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >would vatniks disregard self-preservation
      lol
      lmao

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >russian soldiers an-heroing themselves
        You're right, that never happens.

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Could Ukraine just make their own nuke? Surely they are a latent nuclear power.

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nuclear artillery shells

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_artillery
      >At the end of the Cold War, Russia followed the United States lead and deactivated its nuclear artillery units in 1993. By 2000, Russia reported that nearly all nuclear artillery shells and missile warheads had been destroyed

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I suspect the word "nearly" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          probably, it would be naïve to think they would completely dismantle every single shell
          but also do you trust the random telegram post that says 'according to my information' to be a better source?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yeah telegram is 100% a better source than any bullshit ass thing a Russian official has ever said

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              the best source is always inverting official Russian sources
              and uh
              i am not encouraged by the results currently

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Oh, lovely.

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I know the nuke thing is probably BS but I fully intend to have a wet dream tonight where Russian anti-Putinists donate a nuclear weapon inside Moscow next week.

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    steal 10 nukes, give 1 to uncle sam to take apart at Los Alamos or Oak Ridge. Recieve 100 bn in gibs for a functional ruskie nuke bounty. get freedoms.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >10 Nukes, Only 2 works
      If they manage to pull that off.
      Russia Gonna be tha lauging stock of the world for the next 100 years in military strength
      Nobody will take them serious anymore

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    According to some ukies
    There were some explosion at the Russian Base with the tactical Nuke.
    But according to their intelligence there are no nuke.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If you want to support the work that I'm doing

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      there was shelling aroudn that whole area retard

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Any nukes the Ukies do recover will be handed over to US/NATO glowies pretty much at gunpoint

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *