New russian anti drone armor just dropped

Cope edgehogs?
supposedly they trip up the drone by taking out rotors, and causing it to point the flying rpg charge in the wrong direction when it discharges.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    smelkaka)

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing that these morons do works. We've seen plenty of vehicles blasted off with cope cages and other field mods. Remember that these sub humans are asian rape horde babies with 70 iq

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nice. But mine looks cooler.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Man if we got a drone drop video down the hatch of a submarine I would literally die laughing

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >giant hazard to crew + any infantry nearby
    >parallel to an incoming drone's rotors to ensure minimum possible effectiveness
    Epic

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    clive barker's bmp1

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I see you anon, good reference

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ah yes, thin wire will stop the inertia of a 20kg brick of battery/explosive/drone diving in at 100kph

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If it were made of rebar it might (emphasis on 'might') work.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're meant to trigger the wire igniters on some drones early, not halt the drone itself. Have any of you people ever worked with metal?

      What matters is what is shot at it. A vertical grenade drop pretty much negates it. A horizontal attack would give it the effect of a crappy barrage balloon.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But the wire ones are all anti personnel, so it wouldn't matter. The ones they use against armor are rpg warheads.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Those look thin. How long until they bent out of shape due to movement, wear and tear?

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    These stalks are car radio antennas for cars that have a radio set installed. Taxis used to have these before the developement of mobile phones.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    For a second I thought the barrel had an RPG-22 or RPG-26 stuck into it lul

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That looks very uncomfortable for the mobiks that will ride on top.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We had Cope Cages.
      Now for Coper Pokers.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Cope grass

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >coper pokers
        kek

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Secret Russian anti-drone technology.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Classy reaction image anon, Imma save that shit

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Here's another for you. I have a lot of Teddy, since he was the best president.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You mean cope feelers?

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think it is a nice idea, even if it need some refined. But it would make hard to put meat armor on it.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >smegmalka armor injures your own people and turns any drone into a air burst drone

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I get the idea behind it but to work slat armor has to cover maximum possible area. Cope cages only cover maybe 30% of possible attack vectors, these spikes even less.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait to see a burning mobik's gear snag on this smekalka as he tries to bail off his BMPBBQ and gets pinned to the flames as the drone view slowwwly zooms in.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >hostile architecture to force vatniks inside.
    bloody hell

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      underrated

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      adam something is about to freak out

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No walkable battlefields for him

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >bmp-1 obr.2024 with anti-homeless mobik spikes

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how are the infantry supposed to ride on top of it now?

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this one actually makes sense and might actually work.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No it won’t. FPVs are moving with enough momentum at their terminal phase that some wires aren’t gonna interfere with its trajectory if its rotors clip them. Plus there’s too much dead space between each wire to have them act as a catch. Shit is pointless.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        its not meant to stop the rotors, but detonate the older style wire triggers on drones before their close enough to penetrate the vehicle.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          do you morons understand BMPs have no armor so increasing the distance is pointless?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Still pointless since those types of drones have fallen out of favor plus it will be ineffective against those ones if they are encountered. The circuit is completed by crushing the wires, these do not have the rigidity to do that. These will do nothing.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Is that not exactly what the cope cages are for? They worked in Afghanistan because all the insurgents had were very old RPGs and warheads that would actually detonate when hitting the slat armor. The same armor does seem to work very well in Ukraine.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            thats not how slat armor works, and a shaped charge being slightly further away actually makes it more dangerous which is why modern ATGMs have laser triggers and detonate a full meter away from their target

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              wut. slat armor is expressly designed to trigger a premature explosion and to disrupt jet formation.

              Is that not exactly what the cope cages are for? They worked in Afghanistan because all the insurgents had were very old RPGs and warheads that would actually detonate when hitting the slat armor. The same armor does seem to work very well in Ukraine.

              I think we see less slat armor because neither side has the industrial capacity to roll out armor kits like the US can, plus they might not be prioritizing it since they’re fighting mostly in open fields and not in urban areas, so most kills are done by arty, drones, and advanced ATGMs.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >wut. slat armor is expressly designed to trigger a premature explosion and to disrupt jet formation.

                you are just wrong, look up statistical armor and do your own research

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I think we see less slat armor b
                Slat armor was a 'gimmick' of the 1980s-2010s specifically made to reduce the effectivity of the RPG-7/2 by far the most common AT weapon in the world because soviets and russia never fixed its fuse. An add-on that can stop 50%-60% of the most common AT weapon (+90% in middle east) makes sense. In Ukraine it's dead weight.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/i43PrgV.png

                you're also confused, slat armor works against specific POINT FUSES its not about the type of shaped charge at all but only the fuses

                modern weapons use crush fusing, or laser fusing and are not vulnerable to slats

                This is the correct answer. Slat armor was designed to defeat the fuzing on the most common anti-tank warheads in the sandbox. It was apparently highly effective in this role; I recall a story of one particular Stryker ~20 years ago eating almost two dozen RPGs without taking serious hull damage or casualties among its mounted troops. Slat armor would provide little or no protection against a modern ATGM or an EFP warhead.

                https://i.imgur.com/qTBdL9e.png

                personally I still think the original cope cages could destruct an overfly ATGM like certain tow models or an NLAW as they fly over the target and fuse downward

                it should be possible to physically disrupt the warhead before the magnetic fusing activates

                EFPs may be a form of shaped charge, but their mechanism of penetration is more "conventionally kinetic", you could say. The slug operates at totally different pressures than a HEAT jet, which dramatically reduces its penetrating capability in comparison (which is why direct-impact warheads don't use EFP). This relative weakness is offset by using EFPs against much thinner top armor, and making their liners considerably thicker and heavier than with HEAT.

                With a HEAT warhead, the velocity and pressure of the jet can cut through a cope cage; its only hope is to somehow cause the fuze to fail, which really only works with certain RPGs. With an EFP, the larger, slower mass can bash a hole through the Cope Cage and then straight on through the roof armor.

                Now, if a Cope Cage can somehow catch or bounce a munition, and cause it to face a less dangerous direction before it detonates, then it would be a success; I could see this possibly working against unpowered grenades or bomblets dropped from a drone... maybe. If the Cage were tailored towards a weakness in that specific munition. But there's such a wide variety of munitions out there, with all kinds of different warheads and fuzes, and no one-size-fits-all defense except some kind of tank CIWS, which Russia doesn't have the sensors or computing power for.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                im not talking about defeating the EFP or heat jet, im talking about physically distrupting an overfly missile before its sensors fuse it

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                In what way?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                In case of NLAW, if the missile hits the cage, the impact fuze will detonate it. Depending on the size and shape of the cage, this may cause the missile to detonate above tracks or front hull armour which will lead to suboptimal effect on target. But the shooter can just aim above the cage and get good results anyways.

                I believe TOW-2B has similar fusing.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >wut. slat armor is expressly designed to trigger a premature explosion and to disrupt jet formation.
                That is intensely dependent upon the specifics of the warhead you're optimizing against. Slat armor is not blanket protection against all shaped charges, it's protection against extremely specific models of shaped charges which are designed to have an ideal operating circumstance which slat armor prevents. Most basic armor kits are optimized for sandbox work E.G. RPG-7s.
                Some kits are optimized against more modern stuff.
                More modern shaped charges are designed such that increasing the detonation distance by a modest amount does basically nothing.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you're also confused, slat armor works against specific POINT FUSES its not about the type of shaped charge at all but only the fuses

                modern weapons use crush fusing, or laser fusing and are not vulnerable to slats

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >you're also confused, slat armor works against specific POINT FUSES its not about the type of shaped charge at all but only the fuses
                It's both. It disrupts the fuse but early model shaped charges did not account for variable detonation distance.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >slat armor is expressly designed to trigger a premature explosion and to disrupt jet formation.
                Boomer fuddlore.

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Chaos-kino

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    was this done to stop the FPV drones with the wire detonator in front of them? If thats the case, this might actually work, but it wont stop the newer setups Ukraine is fielding.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They can change the wire loop shape to make that useless. That's the advantage of those crappy no-mass-produced detonators.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        either way it seems outdated since ukaines already moved on to different active detonators.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm sure operators will simply target other bits not covered in cope wires.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Or dive bomb at a steeper angle, seems to be the prefered attack against stationary targets already.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          i understand what their trying to do with this, but the way they did it probably doesnt really work. Something similar with thicker wire, on an angle might have a better effect.

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's like those spikes they put on signs to make birds not shit everywhere

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Miniature barrage balloon cables to deal with miniature planes
    ngl there is a twisted logic there.

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Did some blast-testing of a similar concept against M42 AT submunitions a few years ago.
    It works - even a much shorter rod poking up inside the cone increases standoff and disrupts jet formation to reduce penetration significantly, the rod diverting the direction of the jet/slug even moreso.
    Even much shorter rods are effective, the long antennae is excessive.
    >Armoured Brass auto-rejected the idea before further testing because it "didnt look shiny" to have spiky top surfaces on their toys

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >reduce penetration significantly
      so it doesn't work on a fricking BMP

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Funniest bit: It doesnt need to be sharp steel.
      Even soft rubber spikes are enough to disrupt the jet, and are 'walkable' by the crew.
      >Tfw the Brass see the top of their AFVs looking like a camo-coloured version of those squishy spiky rubber balls

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        see

        do you morons understand BMPs have no armor so increasing the distance is pointless?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's capable enough to stop explosion of rpg 7, like explosion not the penetrating thingy in particular

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >It's capable enough to stop explosion of rpg 7
            lol no the drones can explode from a gentle bump

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >even a much shorter rod poking up inside the cone i
      RPG7 nades tied to drones have closed cone.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      german SPG already have the same armor you're describing

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://www.reddit.com/r/TankPorn/comments/c7d9s2/panzerhaubitze_2000_with_rubber_hedgehog_armor/

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/sebastienroblin/2022/11/29/hedgehog-armor-saves-ukraines-german-built-super-howitzer-from-russian-kamikaze-drone/

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >rod poking up inside the cone
      That is the very important bit - unless the drone gently drops it's rpg payload (without the nosecone) directly vertical atop one of those antennae it is a useless gimmick.
      Might help against the submunitions in cluster shells, but that would require a certain amount of luck, e.g. not getting penned by a malformed jet or the debris/shrapnel from all the other bomblets that came with the shell.

      And I think the Ukies are using (usually) heavier loads against vehicles and use scavenged submunitions against personnel. But my impression stems from the consumption of their videos, so that might be false.

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The roof there has like ~10mm, I don't it would help against an RPG-7 size warhead anyway.

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    To be honest at least this one doesn't prevent them from getting out or obstruct the field of view too much.

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Could work, although it seems like a real pain to set up and maintain

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Explain to me how this would not be effective.

    Careful you don't end up being the one wearing the cope cage.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Explain to me how this is any different from cope cages

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the principle is solid

        Also jury is still out on whether cope cages help or not. Even the filthy israelites are using them.

        Reminder that there isn't a SINGLE PIECE OF FOOTAGE of a Javelin taking out a vatnig tank that's not disabled and abandoned. It's been 2 years and the Javelin was being talked about like it was the savior of Ukraine early on in the war but there's frick all footage of it.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I agree that javelin is not a GAME CHANGER and is rare, but there is footage of it killing moving tanks

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            the only footage i have seen of it is Ukrainians firing it at an abandoned tank from the first year of the war, very very early if i am remembering right. Like at the time there were still armor columns heading to Kyiv. Do you have any webms?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              not gonna go digging around, you can google just as well as I can

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                if i could i would bother with this board at all. Thus war is the only thing still bringing me back to this website.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Also jury is still out on whether cope cages help or not.
          moron besides all the videos proving otherwise
          >Even the filthy israelites are using them.
          only over hatches you moron
          >Reminder that there isn't a SINGLE PIECE OF FOOTAGE of a Javelin taking out a vatnig tank that's not disabled and abandoned.
          moron

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >I AM TRIGGERED!!!!
            Shut the frick up.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            the morons claiming this will work are probably just vatnik shills like this

            Could you be any more overt? What a fricking mong.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the morons claiming this will work are probably just vatnik shills like this

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1501464791222824966?s=20&t=T168SySQP_hmtYGoV1uVLQ
          Enjoy

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Frick all footage
          We've seen like 10 videos of it in action anon.
          Most of them on tanks.

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Those things aren't meant for drones...

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Stupid bird shit making my tanks heavier and thereby reducing the amount of shield points I can mount.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wanted to post this. At least they don't have to worry about flying rats.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      birds = drones
      WAKE UP

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    personally I still think the original cope cages could destruct an overfly ATGM like certain tow models or an NLAW as they fly over the target and fuse downward

    it should be possible to physically disrupt the warhead before the magnetic fusing activates

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      no they can't stop coping

      [...]
      Could you be any more overt? What a fricking mong.

      >I AM TRIGGERED!!!!
      Shut the frick up.

      stop coping moron

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >no they can't stop coping
        why?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >the deafening sound of silence

          LMAO

          To answer your question it's because it contradicts the narrative on his script.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      TOW 2B warheads are easily twice the weight of most RPG shells so they'll tear open cope cages through brute force alone. NLAWs operate off of some kind of Swedish space magic because we've consistently seen cope cage tanks get knocked out by them.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        nothing is 'physically tearing through' the original welded steel bar cope cages that the t72b3 were wielding

        the current random chicken wire bullshit yes

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >nothing is 'physically tearing through' the original welded steel bar cope cages that the t72b3 were wielding
          And pray tell what happened to all of those T72B3s that were rolling around at the start of the war?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            idk go back and read my original post though because you appear to be arguing against a strawman... anycringe....

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >physically disrupt the warhead before the magnetic fusing activates
      Theoretically yes, but the cope cage is also steel so itself plus the vehicle steel will still trigger the fuzing before impact, and EFPs arent as range specific as HEAT jets so the standoff gain is less relevant.
      >maybe Ivan should have gone cheaper with a CC made of logs like the Truck 'spaced logs armor' to be less detectable

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    literal ork teknologee

  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We got these boomers that put zip ties on their bike helmets as spikes to try to stop the magpies. Look like absolute drongos while the birds go for their neck.

  33. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >supposedly they trip up the drone

    those are welded on the body and they are small antennas

    so no they are probably using the body as an amplifier to drive more energy in order to try and jam

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      moron

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        thats a 25mm2 cable on the second photo

        moron they obviously are charging up the body

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          they are charging your ass

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        [...]

        imagine being this moron

        >home on jam

        lmao yes good luck with that
        >more antennas=more jamming

        yes by using the body as an amplifier you canfricking juice up a lot more distributed power

        but hey physics isnt your strong suit

        >all these zero effort posts
        What blew up?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Wait you moron actually believe it's a jammer?
          I assumed you were trolling, like nobody could be this moronic.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            do me a solid and try to find the length of them if they are between 5 and 7 inches then yes they are most certainly antennas to block 2.4ghz and 5.7ghz

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              you are a fricking moron holy shit

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                before i go into details as to why i know that this is a jamming device i want you to explain to us why you think its not moron

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Are you just trolling? Pray tell how a steel plate couples into metallic sticks welded to it, or have they ran a mile of SMA inside the vehicle to connect each "antenna"

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                as i said before you can LITERALLY see a 25mm2 cable on the SECOND pic welded on the fricking plate carrying it to the body and then going back to whatever that dude is holding

                so unless they are members of the local ham radio club that lost a bet and they had to make the world largest dipole that can also attract lightning from jupiter
                then no

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                before i go into details as to why i know that this is a jamming device i want you to explain to us why you think its not moron

                if they are actually using this for jamming they are as moronic as you

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so basicly you know jack shit got it

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >going back to whatever that dude is holding
                A welder.
                >>as i said before you can LITERALLY see a 25mm2 cable on the SECOND pic
                Work cable, for the welder.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >more antennas = more jamming
      Ork moment, also good way to learn about home on jam.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        imagine being this moron

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >home on jam

        lmao yes good luck with that
        >more antennas=more jamming

        yes by using the body as an amplifier you canfricking juice up a lot more distributed power

        but hey physics isnt your strong suit

  34. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Rajeesh, why are you trying to derail this thread about high quality Russian anti-drone smelkalka?

  35. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they could at least commit to the idea

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the ideal armor of warturder
      That's why people shouldn't allow zoomers near the workshop

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia, 2034

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        nafo rats will understand all when Ford Model T obr 2034 covered in tetanus spikes shows up near Ukraine-controlled Ural mountains *~~

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Funny enough, in the movie they do speak Russian.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The buzzards even spoke Russian in the movie and the game. This totally checks out.

  36. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    PWOARH
    Imagine plopping down a mobik one of of them during the dedovshchina 'sesh.

  37. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Won't they just aim for the gaps or the side and hit anyway?

    Most anti-vehicle drones are FPV's and they work by crashing into the vehicle anyway. All this is doing is creating a larger kill zone for the shrapnel as spikes fly everywhere.

  38. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Watch General Dynamics make an up armor kit like this that costs $700,000.

  39. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Russia left their equipment laying out so long it's begun to sprout like a potato

  40. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Those may trigger the coil-and-post fuses on inbound drones before they contact armor. They're easy to push away when dismounting.
    Not really a safety hazard other than tripping.

    Not great, probably futile, not worse than nothing depending on opponents fusing.

  41. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    inb4 US military introduces cope cages, but with secret enriched copper technology, or some shit, for $100k a piece and it'll suddenly become the smartest idea ever

  42. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they obviously work by triggering the explosives too early. Most of the videos we see the drones having wires in front, and crashing into whatever, makes two wires touch, closing the circuit.

    The ziggers hope to close the circuit too early for it to penetrate. Will it work? With some luck; maybe against the FPV drones with the wire trigger setup. But useless against anything else.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they could also use the shorter version of the hedgehog armor like the pzh2000 uses (see my forbes link above). it saved it from lancet's jet.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Those have to be made in a factory though. The ones in op are just like the wooden armor on the trucks at the beginning of the war, feel good armor.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the armor on the pzh2000 works on a completly different principle and is designed specifically against falling submunitions that land on the vehicle and detonate

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        These are useless for anything with a conical diameter above a dpcm munition size.

  43. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's an interesting idea and might have some validity but this thing can't fire with those on there.
    An interesting insight into how armored vehicles are faring in this war. I'm surprised they're willing to totally abandon this thing's combat capability.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Are you being fricking retareded on purpose or something? It can't shoot thru little tiny coat hanger wires?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Can this car be driven, anon?
        Shooting contact-fused low velocity PG-9 warheads through wires isn't a good idea. Even if they don't go off, their ballistics are probably ruined.

  44. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Unleash the big, white wieneratoo

  45. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    is it so mobiks will not make a nest when driving on top of it?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's to keep the mobiks in place when used as armor.

  46. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >by taking out rotors
    no, but to trigger the charge early

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Are the trigger mechanisms really that sensitive? Even if so, it wouldn't be difficult to modify them to counter this, since there is a big difference between an armor plate and a piece of wire hastily welded to the tank.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What, are you saying that they connected the armor plate to the radio, or that each individual "antenna" is connected to the radio? Neither actually works but one is spectacularly worse

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Are the trigger mechanisms really that sensitive? Even if so, it wouldn't be difficult to modify them to counter this, since there is a big difference between an armor plate and a piece of wire hastily welded to the tank.

      >trigger the charge early
      completely pointless

  47. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its amazing how for once we are witnessing a war that is actually inventing stuff so fast that the military complex cant keep up

  48. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    same energy

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *