Did you, moron? >CV90-120 uses a RUAG gun and turret >RUAG Holding (originally Rüstungs Unternehmen Aktiengesellschaft; Joint Stock Defence Company) is a Swiss company
Did you, moron? >CV90-120 uses a RUAG gun and turret >RUAG Holding (originally Rüstungs Unternehmen Aktiengesellschaft; Joint Stock Defence Company) is a Swiss company
Ladies ladies calm down. You’re both beautiful just the way you are
There was never a buyer for the 90120, so there was never a production run. The one in your picture is the one that exists. As it is just standing around and never going to a customer, it is often used as a mannequin for various new systems that Hägglunds Vehicles is developing.
That's why I said "handful"
Reason people want to send them as a coalition in the first place is to cushion the loss of them
If every operator sends 10 tops that's still a hundred tanks
no balls
Archer delivery to Ukraine to be announced tomorrow according to published official documents. Will also include “armoured vehicles” of unknown type.
Is it finally fricking time boys? Is asstank finally getting its time to shine?
Got damn. She's got an ass like a shelf.
it'll be a bunch of old mtlb shitboxes if anything
>“armoured vehicles”
only thing they could send is old patria xa-180
that thing is pure sex, but no replacement for an MBT
>CV90120-T
>Swiss ordinance.
Not a great thing to read when I bring up the wiki on it.
>Swiss
Does anyone actually finish junior high over there?
Did you, moron?
>CV90-120 uses a RUAG gun and turret
>RUAG Holding (originally Rüstungs Unternehmen Aktiengesellschaft; Joint Stock Defence Company) is a Swiss company
Ladies ladies calm down. You’re both beautiful just the way you are
?t=212
OH NO NO NO NO SWEDEBROS!
There was never a buyer for the 90120, so there was never a production run. The one in your picture is the one that exists. As it is just standing around and never going to a customer, it is often used as a mannequin for various new systems that Hägglunds Vehicles is developing.
Swedes wtf did you put on top of your ifv?
With the talk of Leopards by Finland and Poland I wouldn't be surprised if they're considering a small amount of Strv 122
sweden only has 120 of those and they are more modern than the a4's pledged by the other countries
That's why I said "handful"
Reason people want to send them as a coalition in the first place is to cushion the loss of them
If every operator sends 10 tops that's still a hundred tanks
sweden needs to build up its military not get rid of it, it already did too good of a job on that front for the past 25 years.
The lead you gain by killing Russia's military is greater than just keeping the shit in a hangar somewhere.
T. Swede