Moon Debunkers are a joke

We went to the moon. Period. Why can't you just accept it? Are you that stupid?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Canada has never been to the moon you fricking moron

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Humanity went to the moon leafbro

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Humanity went to the moon leafbro

      Stop taking credit for what amerinigs did, poutine Black person.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        we couldnt have done it without the germans
        if more people were cognizant of that fact, moon landing denial wouldnt be nearly as prevalent

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nice shitflag. It gives me a seizure looking it too long.

        You're right though, Canada has never done anything. Most white Canadians just wish we were Americans.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The moon isn't real. Ain't nothing real

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    they don't understand bespoke parts and welding not recreated for official documents.
    Those rocket engines were engineered on the fly.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    its flat earthism in disguise. same kind of mental deficiency.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I also just happen to think you have that mental deficiency thing what do we do now?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        now you get to once again trot out your lying memes and avoid ever engaging in an honest discussion. thats how these things usually pan out.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Wait you tried to engage in an honest discussion?
          Let's try one. Explain the picture in the OP. Can gold foiling survive the vacuum of space?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            yes, homosexual. and the structure under it that makes up the primary body of the lander can survive it too.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Can gold foiling survive the vacuum of space?
            find out exactly what the material was and then come back to talk about it. you can frick yourself with all this gay vague muh foil bullshit. Thats how you'd do this is you were honest.

            Why no star map pictures from the moon? So fricking easy. Dark side of moon, point camera up. Extremely valuable scientifically. The answer is they can't. Whatever projection they put up would be found fake with computers and math showing where each star is on earth and could or should be on the moon and relative to each other. They can't do the math and fake the whole sky and so they never show it. The amount they never show, their narrow lens, proves it is fake.

            thats all bullshit, and they did take a photographing telescope along on a couple missions. plenty of star photos taken.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Can't you just see the flag and a foot mark and a rover there if you have a good enough telescope?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you's need a telescope the size of a small city, but multiple new shot have taken of landing sites by multiple nation's various probes in the decades since the landing so it's not like it's some mystery

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      no, the angular resolution needed is too great. there is supposed to be one optical interferometer telescope which might about have whats needed but because the moon is so close the tracking can't keep up with the relative motion.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Then how are we able to see objects billions of years ago with telescopes?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          they are really big

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          because those objects are extremely far away, so much so that our movement relative to them is practically nonexistent on timescales that humans find relevant. the moon is a lot closer than that.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Why no star map pictures from the moon? So fricking easy. Dark side of moon, point camera up. Extremely valuable scientifically. The answer is they can't. Whatever projection they put up would be found fake with computers and math showing where each star is on earth and could or should be on the moon and relative to each other. They can't do the math and fake the whole sky and so they never show it. The amount they never show, their narrow lens, proves it is fake.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              we've never landed on the dark side because it turns out when you have a shit ton of rock between you it's hard to maintain radio communications you absolute inbred Black person, and landing on the dark side of the moon to take pictures of stars is absolutely inane when you get pictures just as good from LEO. Even so, china landed a probe on the dark side for the first time in 2019.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Light from a galaxy that's ~100,000 lightyears across and ~10 billion light years away
          Angular resolution of 0.00001
          >Light from a lander that's ~4 meters across and ~400,000,000 meters away
          Angular resolution of 0.00000001

          It's the difference between spotting a tree on a distant hill vs spotting a flea on the other side of the street

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            thanks for that, couldn't be bothered to drag that info up right now.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      chinese fly-bys have spotted this. same for india.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings

      we also left a fricking mirror array that multiple countries use to bounce lasers off.
      OP is a motherfricking moron.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        all of that could have been done remotely with robots

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        the mirrors you can reflect off of are remotely placed and no humans did them. also, you can bounce a laser off any part of the moon without them. sto pwatching big bang theory for science.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Moon landings are real, the best achievement of America and humanity.
    Space exploration is a strictly white man hobby that's why Black folk and israelites want you to believe it's fake.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why didn't the Soviets ever go to the moon and confirm our landing?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Read a book Black person.
        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don’t know what to believe anymore from what I heard is that Ukraine has been one of the biggest sex, tourism industries in the world, and also a hotbed of satanic rituals, and they just want to blow up the whole place to destroy any evidence and then leave the whole world into a war to put people back in line
    If this is real, then, are we actually living in hell

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    people like that are as stupid as flat earthers. or even more.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://rumble.com/search/all?q=Taboo%20conspiracy

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    When someone is talking about this you can be completely sure they have never used a telescope.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I believe this is video proof of zero gravity. But yes, you frickers love to see puppet strings in your little brains

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That's the best you got? Dude is adjusting his watch.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I watched this movie a year ago. Before that (for 33 years), I also thought the Moondlanding was real, and I started to watch it with scepticism.
      But by the end of the movie, it convinced that the moon landing was fake. Guy has some really valid points

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        no, he doesn't. put in any effort at all researching any of them and you'll find they're all easily shown to be zero effort lies or moronic misunderstandings.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        im sorry you were taken in by their highly propagandizing techniques and never bothered to do any checking out of each and each point they raised. Overwhelming the target with point after point after point is a well worn method of brainwashing people anon, and they got to you.

        Take a look at the facts they left out
        https://www.moonhoaxdebunked.com/

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          anyway i'm done arguing with people either trolling or legitimately more moronic than downs syndrome whites. look at and it'll have answers to the vast, vast majority of any GOTCHA shit you want to bring up, and if you don't accept those answers then you won't accept any answer and there's no point in posting here other than to jerk off yourself about how clever and smart you are for being right while all the normies are wrong, and masturbation is a sin so you should stop

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I watched this movie a year ago.
        That explains everything. Try looking at the actual evidence.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Guy has some really valid points
        name one. Just one.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Moon Debunkers are a joke
    No, they're demotivator shills.

    There's nothing that would please The israelite more than convincing White people that every great accomplishment in their history was a lie. It's the same reason they're so desperate to blackwash White history.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Space exploration has a very narrow lens. That is why it is obviously fake to those who can see. It's not about proving this or that. The field of view, what they could present to us if they were really up there, is so wide and awe inspiring that moronic believers don't even realize fictional films are the buffer to cement the illusion. They see Nasa and it's garbage and the watch interstellar and gravity and have no fricking clue they are mentally merging the two to allow themselves to believe the garbage real space exploration shits out.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Are you that stupid?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Flat earthers don't understand that UTM is a projection for localized operations only. They took it literally.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Moon landing denial is third world cope

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie-1/

    Everyone needs to read this.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Bros, I've been to Kennedy Space Center. How do you moon landing Debunkers explain the giant fricking rockets they have sitting in the amusement park? Who would build that shit for no reason.

    The moon landings are real. Accept it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Adult Rocket Club.

      We're on the Moon, what you see is a reflection of Greater earth.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This is some low IQ shit, even for a leaf

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://www.youtube.com/user/godgevlamste/videos

          you're welcome.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That means they didn't fake the moon landings. We landed on the moon because we are the moon. They love telling the truth with willful misrepresentation

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Correct. they just flew sideways.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Map derived from the topology of the moon matches the moon
        Amazing!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That's called cognitive bias. You're just stupid.

      https://i.imgur.com/Q643Eqq.jpg

      yes, homosexual. and the structure under it that makes up the primary body of the lander can survive it too.

      Fine if gold foiling and duck tape survive the vacuum of space and protect from the van Allen belt. Were the people from 60 year ago far more intelligent and we're just too stupid? I mean. Gold foiling taped with duck tape is enough to come back from the moon. What kind of special technology can't we reproduce? We can reverse engineer the world. We're writing codes on a computer we inject massively into people to modify their DNA. Somehow we can't make another gold foiled 80 years old technology that worked so well.

      >Can gold foiling survive the vacuum of space?
      find out exactly what the material was and then come back to talk about it. you can frick yourself with all this gay vague muh foil bullshit. Thats how you'd do this is you were honest.

      [...]
      thats all bullshit, and they did take a photographing telescope along on a couple missions. plenty of star photos taken.

      Dude I don't need anyone to tell me what I see. It's duck taped gold foiling.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Dude I don't need anyone to tell me what I see. It's duck taped gold foiling.
        dishonesty and evasion it is then, as always.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Do it moron. Find it and prove me wrong.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            no c**t, im sick of playing your queer game of 'catch me catch me' you little homosexual.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapton
            less than 10 seconds of effort.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              my sides
              dude a fine foiling of Kapton duck taped is all it take to block the van allen belt and the moon radiation
              I 100% believe you
              I believe you so hard
              I wonder why they just didn just make it again and went back. They have to constantly lies about it.

              why would foil be incapable of surviving in a vacuum? why dont you get access to a vacuum chamber, order some of the fricking stuff (which they still make and use) to find out for yourself dickhead?

              Because it genuinely fricking don't look pressurized how the frick do you pressurize duck taped foiling moron? How about you try to duck tape foiling on a ball and you put in a vacuum chamber and you look at what happen

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >it genuinely fricking don't look pressurized
                what the frick do you even mean

                >block the van allen belt and the moon radiation
                fricking lying dickhead. you don't even believe what you're saying here. you're just doing this shit to wind people up you homosexual troll

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >fricking lying dickhead
                that's exactly why they said they put the foiling on to begin with

                https://i.imgur.com/LhqSe3F.jpg

                >Because it genuinely fricking don't look pressurized how the frick do you pressurize duck taped foiling moron? How about you try to duck tape foiling on a ball and you put in a vacuum chamber and you look at what happen
                the pressurization wasn't provided by the foil (which was a multi-layered system of which the kapton was the outermost layer) it was provided by [...]. As for the belts
                >For the Apollo missions, exposure during the crossing of the Van Allen belts was calculated and measured by means of uncrewed test flights: specifically, Apollo 6 (April 1968) carried into Earth orbit an Apollo capsule equipped with instruments for measuring the capability of the spacecraft to block the radiation from the belts. It was found that the exposure was comparable to the effects of a few medical X-rays and therefore was quite tolerable for short periods.
                >The very first human beings to fly beyond the Van Allen belts were the astronauts of Apollo 8. According to NASA’s Biomedical Results of Apollo report (1975), over the course of the entire flight Lovell, Borman and Anders accumulated a radiation dose of 1.6 millisieverts. This is the equivalent of about twenty chest X-rays and is therefore far from being immediately lethal as some conspiracy theorists argue.
                >In other words, the actual level of risk entailed by the Van Allen belts was well-known and tested long before the Moon landings.
                I'm sorry you're too moronic and stubborn to admit you're wrong.

                You're genuinely moronic if you think that happened the frick do you want to tell me. Even the unmanned crew story is patently moronic they would have to send a complete 1 on 1 reproduction of the space prob. Releasing it in space unmanned. Have it comeback to see it's exposure. That never happened. They didn even test successfully the space probs they supposedly used to comeback the first time.
                Full of shit from start to finish. If you can't see that you're moronic.
                Is there gold foiling all around the international space station?
                Do you see any fricking foiling at all?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Black folk will never understand spacetravel,
                its a white man's thing.

                They really can't understand it, so they must tell lies about the white men.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                says the country who never went to space
                your israelites flew to the US to sell the technology your country paid during the last central bank world war
                a golem can't cry so you don't have any problems right

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                how to say you have no idea what you are talking about, without saying you have no idea what you are talking about.

                Explain my questions smart guy

                https://i.imgur.com/TNMJSm9.jpg

                wow must be a giant vacuum chamber, imagine doing all this just to fake perfect Parabolic trajectory on dust and forgetting adding some stars lul

                How do you explain this? did they really film all of this in a giant vacuum chamber,

                and how did they create the microcraters of the surface the moon closeup looks really cool.

                Then you mentioned the van allen belt, i bet you can show me the path (in 3d space) they took, and which parts of the belt they travelt though and how long was the exposure.

                There are so many questions a smart one like you can answer.

                https://i.imgur.com/cLrnwR5.png

                yes they filmed it at wind, which does not affected the dust, only the flag.

                you understand this makes no sense?
                maybe just maybe there is a different answer to the moving flag than wind,
                If you believe this, explain why the dust isn't affected by the strong breeze moving the flag.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                But yet the designs can't be reviewed as they were ((lost)). The technology that got us to the moon was not thoroughly documented and the relics of such accomplishments were left to rot while only recreations exists. Secondly, all first hand recorded footage was surprisingly lost. For such a great achievement it was treated as if it was a murdering Black person.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                explain in detail which technolgy was "Lost".
                explain the process the first images from the moon where sent to earth and how they got on the television.

                Spoiler:
                You can't because what you just said came from a random youtube video with clickbait title.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The designs for the moon lander, space suits, all the electronics used for the navigation and relaunching of the moon lander. The blueprints for rockets used on the lander. The design and specific parts used on the rover. They have repeatedly admitted all of these are lost and can not be recreated as they have no idea how it was done. But they are sure there was a female Black person behind the scenes checking all the calculations of the white men.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                provide links to the exact times someone representing nasa in an official capacity has said exactly this.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Here is a start. You can find the rest. They were ((honest)) about this at the least. https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/Apollo_11_TV_Tapes_Report.pdf

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the telemetry tapes are not any of what you mentioned in that post, nor are they anything important. that telemetry can be recreated at any time (and has, by enthusiast nerds)

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I said it was a start and it does prove half of what I posted. Trying to dismiss actual evidence doesn't look good.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                explain how tapes showing the calculated telemetry (which is useless after the actual mission is completed, and, again, can be recreated and has been by people who aren't even professionals) is at all proving even half of
                >The designs for the moon lander, space suits, all the electronics used for the navigation and relaunching of the moon lander. The blueprints for rockets used on the lander. The design and specific parts used on the rover.
                you can't, because it doesn't.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Random youtube video said this so it must be true.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No, NASA themselves admitted it. It is a simple search away.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Dude, you can watch people reverse engineering the guidance computer for the lander on youtube. Kind of interesting actually. You can download the code (assembly language) for the guidance computer on github. It is all well documented.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                But yet the actual electronics they used were not disclosed and stated to be lost. The actual process to create the moon lander can not be replicated and the original blue print is lost. I am sure there are tons of people who can use current day technology to do fantastic things but I would assume most of it was not available during the moon landing.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                start here. There are plenty more videos of real NASA hardware from Apollo

                Here is the source code for the guidance computer.
                https://github.com/chrislgarry/Apollo-11

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Thank you. I will look into this but I am more concerned about the crafts themselves than the code.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The video link I provided is an intro to a multi-part series of engineers bringing a real Apollo guidance computer back to life. Pretty cool stuff.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >the actual electronics they used were not disclosed and stated to be lost.
                false. guys make identical copies of the entire navigation computer used on the missions, and it works.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the designs weren't lost, the tooling to make them, the millions of man hours of expertise on the people assembling them, and the tens of thousands of people involved who did things by hand are gone. go make a spitfire for me, if you can't then the spitfire never existed and was fake. tv was not an archival medium in the 60s because it still looked like shit, photography was, which is why they still have all the photographs and not the shit ass 320x240 resolution crap video on expensive tapes

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Just because I can't create something doesn't mean it can't be done. But for nasa who spent millions of tax payer dollars on these things to suddenly lose all the documents when questioned about them and to not have a steady process to make them is pretty far fetched. It is standard practice to first document all designs and items needed to create a project before building it. This way if it is highly successful it is easily recreated or improved upon.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The "lost" part is the engineering notes. These were smart men that had to do a lot of "fine tuning" for each and every F1 engine on the Saturn V. NASA has the bluerprints and schematics. They don't have the old engineers anymore.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                no see it doesn't matter than the holes in the mixing chambers were drilled by hand by expert metallurgists, nasa can't just whip up a new one so it's ~FAKE~

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                If they were extremely smart would they not include these items in the documentation for easy recreation? Surely they wouldn't simply randomly drill holes, just mention them offhand while not documenting exactly what they did and how.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                because 'hey the metal here was mildly weaker in this specific bulkhead so i drilled a millimeter to the right instead' isn't at all relevant to any other bulkhead. a ton of the equipment in the apollo program was hand made, hand machined, and hand assembled by some of the foremost experts in the world at the time, and that means each piece was unique in certain ways. why is this so hard for you to understand, Black person?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Only a Black person believes blindly. That sounds like a wonderful excuse to pass off to midwits. "I am smarter than you and you simply don't understand why or how I had to drill a hole here.". Why would they not simply include a short summary of why it was needed and how they made the part and why it was necessary. If they were keen on actual exploration then surely they would want to keep everything well within record.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >literally using 'i'm so much smarter because i don't believe, sheeple'
                yeah man, people document all that shit all the time, just look at any large business' it infrastructure, it's all perfectly documented. no problems understanding their coding there.
                if it's all fake how come none of the tens of thousands of people involved spoke up about it with their proof? if it's all fake why did the us spend 5% of its gdp for a decade straight on it? if it's all fake why have no other nations came out and offiically claimed so with their proof? tons of the world would love to grab the us' nuts and twist. the simplest explanation is that, yes, the moon landings were real.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >What is a Government NDA for 200 alex
                >But none of the thousands spoke up
                Have you ever heard of a masonic lodge?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Do you see any fricking foiling at all?
                the iss doesn't spend days at a time loitering in direct sunlight so it doesn't fricking need the added insulation from reflective foil, Black person.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's exactly precisely what it does. Unless you don't believe it's orbiting a ball.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                it orbits you moron, it's never in the direct sunlight for more than an hour at a time, because half of the orbit is spent with the entire goddamn earth between it and the sun. i hope to god you're trolling because otherwise you're more moronic than a black.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >How much sunlight does the ISS get?
                That means it orbits Earth every 90 minutes—so it sees a sunrise every 90 minutes. Thus, every day, the residents of the ISS witness 16 sunrises and 16 sunsets.
                stop making shit up moron you're two click away

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                it gets 16 sunsets which means it's in the dark radiating heat half the fricking time it's in orbit so it doesn't need covered in reflective layers you GOD DAMNED ABBO Black person

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >that's exactly why they said they put the foiling on to begin with
                you can;t do anything but lie can you? very sad. look at the state of you.

                >Do you see any fricking foiling at all?
                the iss doesn't spend days at a time loitering in direct sunlight so it doesn't fricking need the added insulation from reflective foil, Black person.

                the ISS is covered in a highly reflective (>90%) outer layer, but its not foil. look into it. some good materials engineering.

                They still have to explain how a camera that I own and have used many times works in conditions on the moon where when the sun hits temps rise massively and same when it doesn't hit it gets massively cold. Like -160° celcius cold. That camera stops working at -60°, celluloid melts at 60° and the only thing that was "protecting" the camera was "special paint". Also the camera was attached to them, they were shooting blindly yet took incredibly well framed pictures so not only were they astronauts, they were also professional photography geniuses !

                None of the crew saw any stars but the Gemini team later did so one of them has to lie. None of them swore on the bible they actually went.
                Bottom line, we went to the moon only it wasn't the one that was on the telly

                you don't own one of the heavily modded hasselblads they took. Also, have you ever put the effort into working out how long it would take the camera to cool down when theres no air to carry the heat away?

                Thats a pretty big detail you missed.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                dude
                we can't go to space sorry
                the planet is a prison
                we only go to high altitude
                the freemasons are liar
                there's only two possible explanation for space exploration
                they're lying about how easy it is to go in space or they're lying about how hard it is
                in both case do you truly trust them?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                like i said at the beginning

                now you get to once again trot out your lying memes and avoid ever engaging in an honest discussion. thats how these things usually pan out.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You're not going to the moon dude sorry. Nor to Mars. It's all bullshit.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                its far more believable than your flimsy lies and evasion tactics.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Because it genuinely fricking don't look pressurized how the frick do you pressurize duck taped foiling moron? How about you try to duck tape foiling on a ball and you put in a vacuum chamber and you look at what happen
                the pressurization wasn't provided by the foil (which was a multi-layered system of which the kapton was the outermost layer) it was provided by

                https://i.imgur.com/Q643Eqq.jpg

                yes, homosexual. and the structure under it that makes up the primary body of the lander can survive it too.

                . As for the belts
                >For the Apollo missions, exposure during the crossing of the Van Allen belts was calculated and measured by means of uncrewed test flights: specifically, Apollo 6 (April 1968) carried into Earth orbit an Apollo capsule equipped with instruments for measuring the capability of the spacecraft to block the radiation from the belts. It was found that the exposure was comparable to the effects of a few medical X-rays and therefore was quite tolerable for short periods.
                >The very first human beings to fly beyond the Van Allen belts were the astronauts of Apollo 8. According to NASA’s Biomedical Results of Apollo report (1975), over the course of the entire flight Lovell, Borman and Anders accumulated a radiation dose of 1.6 millisieverts. This is the equivalent of about twenty chest X-rays and is therefore far from being immediately lethal as some conspiracy theorists argue.
                >In other words, the actual level of risk entailed by the Van Allen belts was well-known and tested long before the Moon landings.
                I'm sorry you're too moronic and stubborn to admit you're wrong.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >it genuinely fricking don't look pressurized how the frick do you pressurize duck taped foiling moron?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the frick do you think happen in a vacuum genius?
                explain it like I'm a Black person since you're that fricking good
                you mean not pressurized or depressurized duck taped foiling and survive a vacuum and will not be pushed against the surface it envelop?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >can survive* a vacuum

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Do you think the astronatus are sat inside a foil bag or something, homie there's no need for the outer foil layer to be pressurized, its not containing anything

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                which one
                the international space station is just orbiting in very high orbit not in space
                if you genuinely believe the first space suit used to land on the moon can survive the vacuum of space and radiation exposition I don't know what to say man. You're just fricking moronic.

                it gets 16 sunsets which means it's in the dark radiating heat half the fricking time it's in orbit so it doesn't need covered in reflective layers you GOD DAMNED ABBO Black person

                dude you're moronic give up

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You've lost it

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I don't know man. There's one of us wrong that's for sure.
                What's your point?

                holy shit you're stupider than abbos

                Kek Black person. NASA pretend they won't go higher because it cost too much to resuply.
                Then they started saying "The international space station has been literally falling".
                Not that you would know you're just a fricking moron pretending he's smart.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                of course the iss is 'falling', it's not 100% outside the atmosphere so there's residual drag effects. every so often it needs boosted again so its orbit won't degrade so much it re-enters entirely. that's what LEO is. it's still space, it's just not deep space, hence it being low earth orbit.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >of course you're right but let me tell you why you're not
                redditor moment

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                holy shit you're stupider than abbos

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Fine if gold foiling and duck tape survive the vacuum of space and protect from the van Allen belt. Were the people from 60 year ago far more intelligent and we're just too stupid? I mean. Gold foiling taped with duck tape is enough to come back from the moon.
        you disgusting lying deceiver, this is exactly how you homosexuals twist and misrepresent things in every image, book or 'documentary' you vile b***hes ever produce.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          beside schoolyard name calling do you have any argument?
          gold fricking foiling
          in the vacuum of space
          bro

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            why would foil be incapable of surviving in a vacuum? why dont you get access to a vacuum chamber, order some of the fricking stuff (which they still make and use) to find out for yourself dickhead?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        my sides
        dude a fine foiling of Kapton duck taped is all it take to block the van allen belt and the moon radiation
        I 100% believe you
        I believe you so hard
        I wonder why they just didn just make it again and went back. They have to constantly lies about it.
        [...]
        Because it genuinely fricking don't look pressurized how the frick do you pressurize duck taped foiling moron? How about you try to duck tape foiling on a ball and you put in a vacuum chamber and you look at what happen

        >ignores the couple centimeters of aluminum

        https://i.imgur.com/Q643Eqq.jpg

        yes, homosexual. and the structure under it that makes up the primary body of the lander can survive it too.
        I finally figured it out - you guys literally lack object permanence. Someone puts a piece of tinfoil over brick and the brick stops existing in your mind
        >it's just a wafer thin flimsy little piece of foil - sure, go ahead and throw it at my face
        3-4 mm of aluminum is enough to block 90% of beta particles, a centimeter will cut that down to 99.9% or better.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >How did Apollo get past the Van Allen belt?
          >So how did NASA solve the problem of crossing the Van Allen belts? The short answer is they didn't. To get to the moon, a spacecraft needs to be travelling quickly to climb far enough away from the Earth such that it can be captured by the moon's gravity.
          If you believe in the moon landing you believe in freemasonic fairytale

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >protect from the van Allen belt.
        Why do you morons keep saying this? It didn't protect them. The Apollo astronauts have a higher incidence of illness as a result.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No one denies the rocket launch, but they didn't landed on the moon.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Prove they didn't. There are literally pictures. Are you going to say Stanley Kubrick made those? Prove it

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Proof? Just use logic thinking. It was 1969, 54 years ago. The Soviets launched Sputnik two years before. The US had to come up with something and so the Apollo program was created. After some point they realized, that a landing isn't possible and to not lose their face, they instructed Hollywood to do the 2nd part of the mission..

          Watch the interview with Armstrong and the rest after they "returned" from the moon. They wanted to sink into the ground and were full of shame.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Watch the interview with Armstrong and the rest after they "returned" from the moon. They wanted to sink into the ground and were full of shame.
            I love that one

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I've watched that interview. And again I'll ask you for proof. I know you don't have any though, so I'll continue to laugh in your face. Anyone can make up stories.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Alright, but why did you made that thread then, if you refuse anything against your belief?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I asked for proof. I ridiculed you frickers from the first post. Why are you here without proof? You just want to add nothing to the table? Typical..

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's the hen-egg problem. Prove that they went! You can't. Use your own brain and be open minded to find the truth..

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It would have been very easy for the Russians to disprove the moon landings if they were faked. You can bet they had lots of directional antennas pointed at the moon receiving the same signals everyone else heard. You can't fake that.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This is true and they knew it, but who would have believed them if they have stated that the landing was fake? The US population would have believed it was cheap soviet-propaganda back then and both sides knew that.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >who would have believed them if they have stated that the landing was fake?
                Gee, if only the rest of the world had some way of verifying such claims themselves. You're right, we must only believe what someone in authority says. We are good obedient sheeple. Thinking is forbidden.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The frick kind of signal can do that. 1 prob is able to send a signal from the moon so strong the whole planet can receive it. Kek if that shit was true the whole fricking moon would be one giant fricking satellite.

                its far more believable than your flimsy lies and evasion tactics.

                Yeahh. I just wonder why they always have to lie so much.
                I find it repulsive for some reason.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No, the chicken and the egg is not relatable. The moon landing came first. morons who think they are experts on moon shadows came second.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You made this thread to fortify your dogmatic believes it seems, so be happy and keep staying in your bubble..

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That's a /x/ thread and a shit one not even fun to troll. I wonder how it's still up somehow.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Again bro, the platform is yours. How lonely are you? You crave human interaction it seems, but add nothing. No proof yet again.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Amazing

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              In one answer it is stated, by the guy that stayed in orbit around the moon, that he doesn't remember seing any stars. If that doesn't do it you are lost.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Suppose it were the other way round. That official history were that no one has set foot on the moon and the conspiracy were that they did a secret manned moon landing. NOW TELL ME YOU'D ACCEPT YOUR (easily shooped) PIC RELATED AS EVIDENCE.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you show that "moonlanding" video to anyone who knows about physics, and they laugh. University professors see it and say
      >yep, it is fake
      Remember how they said Stanley Kubrick had nothing to do with NASA, for years? And now they say
      >well, he filmed a moonlanding just in case there was a problem with the real one (which is totally real, chjd)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      fun fact
      the original footage needs to be slowed down by 33%

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        you know who's behind it
        they also claimed the moon and founded the tranquility lodge 2000

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        there are many articles where some filmmaker debunks the "slow down" theory by saying that there was not a camera that could film the necessary framerate for the overcranking
        >https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/apollo-landing-footage-would-have-been-impossible-to-fake-a-film-expert-explains-why

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          you mean this guy?

          >it was impossible to fake it back then!
          >gets exposed by jarrah white

          >attempts damage control and moves goal post from impossible to fake to "not bloody likely"

          >gets told by jarrah some more and shuts up

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            jarrah fricking white, the great blunder from dahn andah, what a massive lying homosexual.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              his work exposing the moon landing is top notch
              too bad is website got taken down recently

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                its not. he's been taken to pieces so many times its laughable he has the lack of integrity to continue showing his face anywhere.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                its not. he's been taken to pieces so many times its laughable he has the lack of integrity to continue showing his face anywhere.

                just checked and the site is back up
                http://moonfaker.com/faqs.html
                go debunking bro

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                pick an issue, he's absolutely full of shit.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the VLT-I

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >ad hominem
              you need to read the sticky before posting on /misc/. Then come, and we can have a conversation

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                suck a wiener. every single moonhoax poster breaks all the rules pertaining to honesty of discussion so you can frick yourself. all they do is come here posting their pasta and acting like c**ts.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >it's okay when I do it
                sure thing, kid

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I went to Moon yesterday to get a nap (wife wouldnt stop b***hing, you know how it is!), some alien came to me and said ",sir you cant sleep here" so I KNOCKED IT OUT!

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >falling for the fairy stories of the birthplace of Hollywood

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      wow must be a giant vacuum chamber, imagine doing all this just to fake perfect Parabolic trajectory on dust and forgetting adding some stars lul

      How do you explain this? did they really film all of this in a giant vacuum chamber,

      and how did they create the microcraters of the surface the moon closeup looks really cool.

      Then you mentioned the van allen belt, i bet you can show me the path (in 3d space) they took, and which parts of the belt they travelt though and how long was the exposure.

      There are so many questions a smart one like you can answer.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Kubrick filmed it in a hanger and outside.
        He used cement powder to simulate Moon dust.
        The van Allen belt is the Firmament you cannot pass through. You live in a Realm.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >You live in a Realm.
          no, you live in a realm. a moronic realm of fantasy and lies.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >a moronic realm of fantasy and lies.

            Pretty much, the parasites have control of it..

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Nice proof you got there. The evidence is amazing. Have you even heard Bart Sibrel talk outside his shit documentaries? The guys who lead this fake moon misson charge are literally moronic.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          except the moon missions went around the outskirts of the belts. not through.
          For the same reason there's ozone holes on the poles..

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          you have good intentions, but you are a moron. Here, there's some good evidence regarding Kubrick's involvement here
          >https://odysee.com/@PressingTowards:3/Kubricks-Odyssey-I--Kubrick-and-Apollo-2011:9

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Kubrick filmed it

          you have good intentions, but you are a moron. Here, there's some good evidence regarding Kubrick's involvement here
          >https://odysee.com/@PressingTowards:3/Kubricks-Odyssey-I--Kubrick-and-Apollo-2011:9

          >Kubrick's involvement

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not surprised

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Clown show anon
              HAHAHA

              As an anon said in another thread:
              'Watch the Earth rise in this video. It's hilarious.'

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                what did I just watch? People think that is real? No wonder they believed in covid. Have you seen the video of some old nasa saying
                >yeah kubrick filmed a moonlanding, but it was a backup, in case there was a problem with the real thing
                I can't find it anymore. It was after a conference

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Have you seen the video of some old nasa saying

                No but that seems like something the ~~*clowns*~~ would say.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sure moon landing is real. We just conveniently quit going when the average joe could watch and see for himself and cameras upgraded in quality. NASA can't manage to scrape together a mission to return in modern era. Modern images released are proven to be salami and photoshop. No mars mission yet. Every televised space launch of satellites has multiple cuts and camera "outages". We watch billionaires launch into "orbit" on TV and come back down via parachutes after just going up to cruising altitude. China is still using balloons even though they supposedly have satellites in space. GPS uses towers to triangulate not actually communicate with a satellite.

    Lol
    Lmao even

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Whats really out there in space? What is nasa so afraid of?

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why is there wind on the moon? I was told there was no, or very little, atmosphere there which means no wind/air. How could the flag flap if not for wind?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      there's no atmosphere so there's no atmospheric drag to dampen motion. you can't erect a flag without making it move. so it kept moving for far longer than a flag would in still non moving air.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This seems like a very israeli lie. In a vacuum there would be 0 motion. Even with just a tiny influence of gravity, in the face of 0 atmosphere and wind that tiny bit of gravity would pull the flag down and not let it stand erect.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >there's zero motion in a vacuum
          what the frick are you saying, moron. just because there's no atmosphere there's no motion?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      its not flapping idiot, it is static. no one ironed flat.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The flag flapped in the broadcast of the moon landing. It moved continuously through the filming as well. This is in direct contradiction to what is "known" about the moon and it's atmosphere.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yes they filmed it at wind, which does not affected the dust, only the flag.

          you understand this makes no sense?
          maybe just maybe there is a different answer to the moving flag than wind,
          If you believe this, explain why the dust isn't affected by the strong breeze moving the flag.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            That is why it is a question and not an answer. I thought that was pretty clear.

            >there's zero motion in a vacuum
            what the frick are you saying, moron. just because there's no atmosphere there's no motion?

            In a vacuum there is no motion unless a force is applied. If you stand a flag in the middle of a vacuum the flag will not move. Pretty self explanatory. Another israeli tactic of name calling and trying to install fear through intimidation instead of simply answering the question.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              mhhh maybe just think how the flag was mounted, was it like a really strong steel rod?
              Or maybe just maybe it was a lightweight flimsy rod connected to another flimsy rod?

              mhhhh hard really hard, if there would be something to "Simulate" this, ahh noo just don't think about it.
              I bet it was wind.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                A flimsy rod would not allow the flag to move while remaining stationary itself. That is an extremely poor explanation.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                then it MUST be wind on the set!
                not possible you can't see the motion of the rod in the 200x144p video footage.

                The explanation of them filming it on a set with a strong breeze that NOT affects the dust in any shape of form is a way better explanation!

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Maybe, I don't know. But it is pretty obvious that they are contradicting themselves no with sufficient explanation but still able to get millions of people to believe their lies constantly. These are the same people saying integrating with Black folk is a good thing.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We didn't land on the moon because it doesn't exist and the earth is flat

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >We went to the moon.
    Not an argument. And the USSR beat ya to the first rocket in space contest, which we all know was the real competition, and you lost. Also the first man in space, so double whammy, loser.

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    N

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The trouble here is that nobody can go to the moon anymore... 54 years later and counting.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      there's been plenty of missions to the moon since, just none with people on them because including a human being makes it insanely more complicated to do for zero actual benefit. the only reason we did it back then was to wave our dick at the commies so we could go USA NUMBER 1

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        How much goyslop do you consoom? Reckon it's a lot. Head on down to Dall E 2 to generate some of your source trust me bro heckin robot moon photos

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      "we don't do this because it is easy. We do this because it is hard". - Kenedy

      Men/engineers were better back then.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Because the israelites running the world decided to redirect the vast resources and manpower of the human empire towards frying bottomless buckets of fried chicken for shiftless Black folk.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        yeah, basically. it's not profitable at all to send dudes to the moon just cause you can, while throwing buckets of money at the MIC while cutting taxes on the rich is very profitable.

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Moon debunkers are either israelites looking to demoralize us by taking away our greatest achievement or (far more common now) the fricking morons that take every conspiracy pill because they can't think for themselves.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Capitlizes israelite
      Uh huh

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I believe the bible

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You pile of shit.
    >be NASA
    >lie about radiation belt
    >lie about rockets creating thrust in a vacuum
    >like about temperature
    >fake moon landing
    >record over original live footage
    >lose all 500 boxes of the moon landing tapes in 2006
    >magically find them in time for the 40th anniversary
    Your circle jerk NASA power fantasy is a fricking.
    >MOON LANDING WAS FAKE
    AMERICAN MOON

    What Happened on the Moon? - Part 1

    What Happened on the Moon? - Part 2

    KUBRICK'S ODYSSEY

    >International Space Station is FAKE
    ISS Hoax - The International Fake Station

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >NO STARS IN PICS
      go outside during the day and take some pictures of stars for me. if you can't then stars are fake

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        take it up with NASA

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        There's no light pollution in the moon you moronic Black person normie homosexual. Go fellatiate DeGrasse

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yeah man the sun pointing at the giant white orb that they were standing on isn't light pollution.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The pic moronic but American Moon is an interesting doc

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A few low budget videos, and voila you're convinced? I've watched them all.

      Yawn...Where are the credible Debunkers? Oh wait, there are none. Just a stupid fricking leaf in his mom's basement.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It doesn't matter if you've watched them or not. Your opinion is fricking worthless because you take the side of liars. Goes perfect with the covid vaccines you took.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We didn't.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It isn't something you can land on.
    The video of the lander blasting off back into orbit? Motion tracking automated camera that can relay full motion video 278,000miles. Okay.
    It gets funnier every year that we did this amazing thing six times, 55 yrs ago and we never went back with all the tech we have now. We also destroyed all of the files, telemetry data from the greatest accomplishment of man.
    There are hundreds of movies showing how it was all faked. In 2023 there is no excuse not to know this was faked.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    its very easy to go to the moon

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What game is this?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        kerbal space program, which reminds me ksp2 early release just came out today!

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >We
    >Flag
    The only somewhat significant place you went are the finals of the IIHF ice hockey olympics, leaf.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They still have to explain how a camera that I own and have used many times works in conditions on the moon where when the sun hits temps rise massively and same when it doesn't hit it gets massively cold. Like -160° celcius cold. That camera stops working at -60°, celluloid melts at 60° and the only thing that was "protecting" the camera was "special paint". Also the camera was attached to them, they were shooting blindly yet took incredibly well framed pictures so not only were they astronauts, they were also professional photography geniuses !

    None of the crew saw any stars but the Gemini team later did so one of them has to lie. None of them swore on the bible they actually went.
    Bottom line, we went to the moon only it wasn't the one that was on the telly

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Most damning evidence that it happened is that not even the soviets denied it

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Then you don’t know Russians and Russian politics.

      https://i.imgur.com/rtYJqAZ.jpg

      Everything’s perfect here, the model building round-shaping strip technology.
      Not one teaspoon of moon dust in the soup bowl landing gear.
      But the actual smart thing and purpose of the foil: wherever you could have reflections of more than one light source in an relative angel to the camera pov, everything’s taped up nicely with dull gloss foil.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Then you don’t know Russians and Russian politics.
        Why don't you explain to us then Ivan, while you take a break from posting pro-Putin shilling.

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Real eyes
    Realize
    Real lies

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      wow, one rotation per 24 hours?
      Damn we would all fly away!

      this is enough shitposting for one day.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >what is this "radius" you speak of?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Does gravity take this force into account?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Well, yes. Your apparent weight is a little lower when you're closer to the equator than when you're closer to the poles. That's, like, physics 101.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >That's, like, physics 101.
            Are there experiments confirming this postulation?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Realize inertia, Black person.

      Imagine being on a bus, train, or plane and it’s traveling 40-500 mph. You get up from your seat and walk down the aisle just fine, moron, yet “you” are going 500mph. This is what’s going on with the earth spinning. Now, if the bus, train, or plane comes to a sudden stop and you’re in the isle, your inertia will hurdle you to the front. Imagine if the earth suddenly stopped what would happen. Use your brain and realize that flat earth is impossible and anyone who thinks the earth is flat is a blithering idiot.

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The foil was there to shield from radiation. Very light-weight protection.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Just because all of the nations and scientists on Earth lied about Covid, doesn’t mean they would lie about other stuff. Right???

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If the US was able to go to the moon with computers as powerful as today's calculators, then why we can't do that today? Why can't a manufacturing giant like china send people to the moon if it's that easy?

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The biggest counter -argument is that the traces should still be visible on the moon. Wouldn't the Chinese or Russians whistleblow?

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    single most important event in human history they erased the tapes of it - to "save money" lol
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nasa-tapes-idUSTRE56F5MK20090716

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yeah man they erased the grainy videotape originals that were only there for propaganda purposes instead of archival purposes, this PROVES it was fake. ignore the thousands of high quality photo negatives though those don't matter

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Real eyes
    Realize
    Real lies

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      We are talking about the moon leafbro. M-O-O-N is called moon, not MARS.

      Trudeau's education system continues to show cracks. Frick

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It’s further evidence they’re lying about space travel which is related to going to the moon, leaftard.

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Actual moon landing

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It’s all so tiring

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We sure "did" goyim, take your boosters and trust science too

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/cM8SZjl.jpg

      It’s all so tiring

      Slightly off topic but related.
      Anyone who thinks crop formations are made by aliens or some magic earth energy is a dumb fricking donkey.
      Same israeli shit that gave everyone the holocaust, the fake moon landing, 9/11, and covid.
      The stupid virus looking formation came out in may 2020. Just in time for the covid psy-op.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nice pic mutt. Some freemasons took a pic in front of a test platform on earth. Wow, masons want some sort of gay clout.

      You've proved frick all, which is what I'd expect from a Brazilian.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Why don't you prove the moon landing happened. Do it with nasa.gov

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >bla bla bla i'm a stupid moron bla bla bla
        You are the reason of why the israelites are so powerful these days, stupid vaxxed moron.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I am unvaccinated and white. You cannot claim 2/2 there mutt.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Curious. How did you challenge the mandates to remain unvaccinated?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Not that hard. Don't live in the city and work for yourself. This issue never effected the farmers where I live.

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >We went to the moon
    Humans can't survive further than LEO

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This, I find moon hoaxers even more obnoxious than flat earthers

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It’s too much of a black bill for schizos and other conspiracy gays. White men of the 1960s sent white men to the moon with pocket calculator computing. These men are dead, the technology is lost and we wouldn’t be able to go back even if we wanted to. The black pill is too much for people to handle.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I think the fact that a nazi engineer who invented the liquid-fueled rocket, is the one who led the Saturn V team. That is too much for a lot of people. They want to deny that part.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That too

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    what a newbie

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      People that believe this shit don't even watch their hero's. What a fricking embarrassment.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      hahaha

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That "horizon" is like 80 meters away kek

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Please show your calculations for how high the moon man should jump please. I will entertain your arguments with proof of work.

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    what were their space suits made of again ?

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    NO israeliteS DON'T GO TO THE MOON IT IS IWS OWN LIGHT ALL OF IT DEBUNKED AND ADMITTED FALSE CONVEX VECTORS AREN'T A PLANE ERIC DUBAY AND OTHERS
    ITS EGYPTIAN CANNIBAL RELIGION WITH BUZZ ALDRIN'S SATANIC ANTI CHRIST ASS

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder if they guy who filmed this ever made it back

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That was filmed by equipment left on the surface for that purpose. This is all documented.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Who grabbed the film to be developed? They didn’t have digital cameras back then. Everything was on film that needed to be processed and developed back on earth

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/1cOiDTX.jpg

        what if i told you the button that activates the thrusters also trigger a second mechanism ? i know its so bizzare for ppl in the 60s to have that kind of technology, they just fought a world war where technology exoloded 10 fold but ok...

        Equipment strapped to the lunar module, just automatically zooms out, and keeps it in center frame the entire it lifts off, perfect tilt, even after 2 other failed attempts, thankfully on the last time we have ever been - it not only worked, but it worked absolutely flawlessly. Lets just completely disregard that cinematographers at the time had a hard time doing this type of shot on earth with state of the art camera equipment that required multiple people to work, they just did it automatically and that was that.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      of course he did

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      what if i told you the button that activates the thrusters also trigger a second mechanism ? i know its so bizzare for ppl in the 60s to have that kind of technology, they just fought a world war where technology exoloded 10 fold but ok...

  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So...we went to the moon with less tech than a Atari 2600...and promptly destroyed the tech because...

  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Are you already vaxxed i hope? And get your boosters?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why don't you read the fricking posts bro. Man I hate you shit flag frickers. Lowest IQ of the day award goes to you.

  73. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    why havent we gone back? no memes. why have no humans been back to the moon with all tech advancements. we could get soil samples, rock samples (recall NASA gave out rocks and they turned out to be petrified wood when examined), use various new chemical and biological advancements to search for life or remains or ground penetrating radar or other experiments.

    instead we went once, played golf and went home and the stuff we brought back turned out to be fake rocks and we vow never to return because we dont have the tech and nasa destroyed it all. bizarre is only way to describe that.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >(recall NASA gave out rocks and they turned out to be petrified wood when examined),
      lie. it was never given out by nasa. it was a fake made by some dutch guys. see, this is the kind of thing you heard in lying youtube video, never checked out even a little bit, then find yourself repeating, mindlessly, for years to come.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I agree with you there. But that doesn't debunk anything.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Human IQ has been in free fall for 150 years

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If they can send a rover to mars (which they can’t) why not send a rover to the moon? That would one and for all prove or disprove the moon landing.

  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why are there no stars, does moon have light pollution problem?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      its a camera exposure setting problem and, in a more general sense, a problem that moonhoax believers have in understanding anything at all.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        So they sent a shitty potato camera to the moon, why haven't they gone back with better cameras?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          those are still about the best camera you can get. digital equivalent of 30-100MP for color/black and white.

          the VLT-I

          dont be shy, explain the point.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            you wanna debunk jarrah so go to http://moonfaker.com/faqs.html and search for vlt

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            So if the entire point of the trip was to take pictures, did they not teach them how to use a camera? My iphone can take movies of the stars.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          we cant even get non potato quality from ukraine war today on earth with every person using some 16k apple phone in their pocket. all 360p artifact tiktoks and youtube clips for reddit. no real combat video like iraq or anything. all space videosa re fisheye rendered from data after the fact nonsense. the world is fricked and people just accept it.

  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    kys

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    this always cracks me up
    >conspiracy theorists, you have a problem.
    and then they never delivered

  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >"the simulations were so real that no controller could discern the difference between the training and the real mission."

  78. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  79. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    galileo was right guise

  80. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Have none of you morons seen this?
    >say something israelite glowBlack folk.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There is nothing wrong with this footage. It's sped up so you think it looks unnatural but you are wrong.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  81. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The moon landing is the myth of this age. It's only allegorical.

  82. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    These threads just convince me more that earth is flat or at least nasa is full of lies

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      flat earth is meant to discredit moon landing realism

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      These threads convince me our educational system is a joke. You people are legit moronic.

  83. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Peter Hyatt is a forensic statement analyst who was paid to analyze this interview of Neil Armstrong. He concluded the astronaut was being deceptive throughout.
    starts at around 4 minutes in

    https://odysee.com/Analysing-The-Astronauts-Part-1:c

  84. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    homie, we just went to war with a wind blown ice fishing tent but yeah "moon" in the 60's.

  85. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >B-b-but muh galaxy is millions of light years away
    >Muh-my mass calculations!
    >Gravity alone cannot be the only force present.
    I know what you're all thinking.
    >This is where any >80 IQ White Man would figure out his mass estimates fricking suck.
    BUT NOT THE israelite, NO SIR.
    >M-muh ~~*dark matter*~~ must exist
    -No evidence
    -No reason to think this
    -No detection, ever
    -No theory which makes sense
    -No fricking dark matter.
    Shlomo>Black folk are dark, Sethy, let's call it dark matter!
    And laugh at the goyim, while we eat bagels and take their shekels.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *