1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How will anyone take us seriously after this?

    Stay strong sistas

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    china’s kitbash aesthetic usually looks pretty ok but the j20 is WEIRD AND UGLY.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      like most Chinese equipment, it looks great from some angles and looks shitty from others

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        someone posted a sneak shot of the 2 seater version and it seemed ok looking, but the vanilla j20 looks ugly basically from every angle, even the front it looks meh

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      like most Chinese equipment, it looks great from some angles and looks shitty from others

      the j-20 just looks like cheap knockoff chinkshit from every angle. speaking of,is that chink j-20 top gun rip off movie out yet? it looked like cringe kino.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Tasteless gay

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          eat shit, bug. the j-20 looks like a cheap knock off. chinks can't build anything original.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No u

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            you're a tasteless gay

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Looks like there's still space underneath for a couple more missiles. Can't they make those rotating carousels like the US has? Maybe make the belly protrude a little to give more leg room

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                probably too much work.
                I think they'll do a folding fin version of the PL-12/15.

                The J-20 would look fucking awesome if they kept the back, made the cockpit smaller and the nose more tapered, and decreased the size of the canards and air intakes. Most of the wrongness comes from the front of the aircraft, with those weirdly boxy air intakes, weird canard placement, and too-wide nose.

                > Most of the wrongness comes from the front of the aircraft, with those weirdly boxy air intakes, weird canard placement, and too-wide nose.
                Nah. Intake looks BEEFY. Very MiG25ish The DSI bulge is bretty bigg tho.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Intake looks BEEFY. Very MiG25ish

                It doesn't work with those weird canards that look like a dog's ears. MiG-25 aesthetics work because each part of the aircraft from the wings to the engines to the nose is unapologetic and bold, with uncompromising straight lines and pointy edges. J-20 reeks of compromise, those forward-canting air intakes look laughable with the weird off-angle canards and the nose is the worse of all, it's divided into angles at the bottom and makes the cockpit look even more awkward.

                Backside is pure kino tho, I love the straight delta wing and the little tail finlets under the twin vertical stabilizers.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I like how the J-20 looks from the side. Sort of reminds me of the J-8II.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The design of the J-20 came from the J-9 first designs.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Canard is really good. Makes it so it can take off from a short runway, acts as brakes too when landing. Plus it looks good from the front

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      actually, J-20 and some Russian-licensed knockoffs are the only things in their arsenal that don't look like shitty plastic mockups

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        J20 like most modern weapon designs just looks soulless

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          J-20 looks good what are you talking about https://youtu.be/vKpLuyFHxRA

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Best video of J-20 so far https://youtu.be/6aiyJbDXvPk

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            To me peak fighter jet aesthetic is the mig 25.

            These new 5th gen stealth fighter jets look like someone took an actual plane, sanded off the pointy edges and corners then submerged it into wax to make it safe for children.
            Just sovlless compared to kino like this:

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The wings look too thin its ugly

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        why does he need 4 microphones? is it in case 3 of them break?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The J-20 would look fucking awesome if they kept the back, made the cockpit smaller and the nose more tapered, and decreased the size of the canards and air intakes. Most of the wrongness comes from the front of the aircraft, with those weirdly boxy air intakes, weird canard placement, and too-wide nose.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't like the look of most Chinese designed fighters (I think the J-10 has to be one of the ugliest planes ever designed), but I like how the J-20 looks. it's like a Saab 35 Draken took a bunch of steroids and then got some sort of transhumanist cyborg shit built into it.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thankfully the J-31 is peak aesthetics.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    People dont realize what sort of barns flankers are. They have an internal fuel capacity that fucking eagles have with all 3 external tanks. They were designed to do missions in USSR backwater tier distances

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    For me, it's the JF-17, the best looking Chinese fighter. It's sad they don't fly it themselves.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i prefer the looks of the j10. it just looks… different, but not in an ugly way, you know? Like a rejected Gripen design from the mid 90s

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Kind of a trend that pretty much all of China's jets look like rejects or knock offs of other jets.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          to be fair, there’s only so many directions you can take aircraft design. but the mashup of eurofighter and gripen does af least LOOK nice.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        IAI Lavi knock-off developed in the 1980's is why

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          so the kitbash aesthetic, in your view, works better because it cribbed more of the design of the lavi than other designs? I can see that, although aerodynamically there are enough differences that a wholesale copy of the design is probably not what went on. regardless in my view it looks like China did the China thing and copied Israel’s homework, but had to do enough different where they actually came up with something that looks reasonably attractive.

          Bet it’s electronics suite is still ass though. And the rectangular intake definitely works better than the newer DSI.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Retard

          so the kitbash aesthetic, in your view, works better because it cribbed more of the design of the lavi than other designs? I can see that, although aerodynamically there are enough differences that a wholesale copy of the design is probably not what went on. regardless in my view it looks like China did the China thing and copied Israel’s homework, but had to do enough different where they actually came up with something that looks reasonably attractive.

          Bet it’s electronics suite is still ass though. And the rectangular intake definitely works better than the newer DSI.

          > Bet it’s electronics suite is still ass though.
          Big dumb

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Retard

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              yes, you're an absolute retard.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The only thing the Lavi and J-10 have in common nowadays it's looks.
              EVerything else it's completely different from each other.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you're a fucking dumbass.
                have you EVER worked on a complex engineering program?

                the j10 is literally a copy of the lavi airframe modified to accommodate chinese engines avionics.

                of course they probably copied what was in the lavi as well or made copies of other systems.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Retard
            except the other anon is correct.

            there isnt single aircraft china has that isnt a copied from another.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              you're a fucking dumbass.
              have you EVER worked on a complex engineering program?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Reminds me of a Herman Miller office chair.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          my aeron gets fucking covered in dust. the fabric is like a cheese grater. i think it shreds your clothes or something when you move around. it's gross.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            interesting, I was thinking of getting one. haven't heard many bad reviews of it. maybe I'll look into something else.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              dude it's great don't let me dissuade you. if it broke today i'd buy another one tomorrow. it was one of the best decisions i've ever made. bought one used on craigslist, cleaned it up and it's been fucking golden. i'm exaggerating about the dust, it's just that i'm a lazy shitass and don't wipe it off. a normal chair probably does the same thing, you just can't see it since it's not mesh.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's an F16 drawn from memory

      https://i.imgur.com/O81IfBw.jpg

      i prefer the looks of the j10. it just looks… different, but not in an ugly way, you know? Like a rejected Gripen design from the mid 90s

      Eurofighter designed by drunkards

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It's sad they don't fly it themselves.
      they do, china operates the mig 21.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        "modern" J-7s are not MiG21s, my boi. They're far superior. And the PLAAF operates probably less than 50 at this point.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          j7 is a license built mig 21 lmfao. china has other mig-21 copies.

          when did this board get flooded with chink shills.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            there was never a license for the MiG21 since intellectual property wasn't really a thing for the Soviet Union between communist states.
            J-7 has close to a dozen variants, and the production line was active until a few years ago for the Bangladesh export order.
            I would suggest you peruse some real literature on the topic since you're a fucking moron.

            [...]
            the j10 is literally a copy of the lavi airframe modified to accommodate chinese engines avionics.

            of course they probably copied what was in the lavi as well or made copies of other systems.

            >the j10 is literally a copy of the lavi airframe modified to accommodate chinese engines avionics.
            Then it's not a literal copy, retard.
            Airframe is the SIMPLEST THING on a 4th gen combat aircraft. Why don't you go take a look at the top down view of all the close coupled 4th gen delta canard designs and tell me who copied from whom.

            china produced them until 2013. they are still operational in the chinese air force.

            Outside the JJ-7s, the number of active airframes is very low, and I don't think any are in real frontline service.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              license built means they literally gave you the plans and tooling, sent advisors to set up facilities aid in manufacturing and probably supplied other parts too.

              >Then it's not a literal copy, retard.
              >Airframe is the SIMPLEST THING
              it is a dead copy. israel even admitted in 1995 it transfered the design to china. its a slightly lengthened single seat lavi to accommodate chinese engines, you must be blind.

              also airframe design also isnt "simple", you have no idea what you are talking about.

              also the j7 is still in service, look it up. china hasnt retired it. go be chinese on www.chinadefenseblog.com or something.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it is a dead copy
                dumb. real dumb.
                > israel even admitted in 1995 it transfered the design to china
                false
                you're a fucking moron.

                >also the j7 is still in service
                How many brigades?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        China is retired their J-7's a few years ago.
        Their mainly operate J-11's and J-10's now.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          china produced them until 2013. they are still operational in the chinese air force.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The flanker always was so big?

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Phonefag

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why is it so small?

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Damn, and the J20 is big compared to the F-35.
    USAbros...

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what PrepHole does think of the FANTAN Q-5?
    popular in BF4.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's my SL printer in WarThunder, so i like it.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine these two scissoring

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *