Maginot line bros... WE ARE SO BACK!

Maginot line bros... WE ARE SO BACK!

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bunkers?

    Mines!
    This are true cryptonite of the Slavs. They have no counter. Just charge head first into minefield.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      russian tactics somewhat closely resemble interwar military doctrine, making me think 1930's fortifications could be very effective. After all, they are built to withstand artillery bombardment and deter meat waves

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Today direct fire weapons are too abundant and strong.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          But they're also extremely vulnerable to drones, be they an infantryman with a launcher or a tank. Pillboxes with drone screening are an evolution of the present trench networks that are screened by drones.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Question: Why not put ablative armor on the pillbox?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Add a laser.

            Done.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Lithuania makes lasers

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        how many human waves does it takes to defeat that?
        asking for a russian general friend of mine

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Too much for modern day militaries. Developed countries having an average age of 40-45 makes human waves very expendable.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I meant to say expensive.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Not complete, no squat latrine.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that Russia has ZEROOOO (0) ZILCH NADA NOTHING TO COUNTER F-35s
    They are objectively SHIT and FINISHED even without all this prep.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I mean, the Russians detected drones coming from Ukraine and didn't manage to shoot them down for 3 hours until these exploded into their Baltic Sea oil/gas port. F-35s will be impossible to counter for them.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I miss Dumbledore-posting.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >some Russian war blogger made a Sorting Hat meme to mock Ukies on Telegram
        >ends up getting killed in Krynky

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah but you need something to stop them from just bumrushing across the Baltics before the F-35s can stop them.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah it's an impossibility to FLY a PLANE that FLIES to where it needs to be faster than r*ssians can amass a land invasion force. Truly an impossible feat for any country, least of all to one that is 2 tech levels ahead of any near peers and keeps throwing money at the MIC.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Bumrushing with what? horse drawn wagons?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I hope so

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        S300 s400 have continuously failed to detect 5th gen planes.
        Since they can't.

        NATO would enjoy total and complete areal superiority as even a small fleet of 5th gens can wipe out their entire air force and air defence systems given they can be maintained.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Holy shit blessed digits

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Wasn't the F35 designed by diversity hires?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Really? As john from iowa oblast that is really upsetting

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        yup and the entirety of the US military is trans how ever will we survive such blistering mean words
        I love these insults because when you shaved apes inevitably get dunked on by the DEI-powered Trans Machine it makes it even funnier to realize how much seething you have self-inflicted making impotent libz jokes

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Nah, US defense industry is one of the whitest industries in the US thanks to clearance requirements

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Russia has nothing to counter a handful of funny little trucks, let alone hundred million dollar fighter jets.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Said Dumbledore as he stretched his legs calmly

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What about J20

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How dare those Baltics warmongers bully poor little Russia this way...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That was Finnish leftist mindset during the Cold War they argued against civilian nuclear bunkers because they're apparently a provocation against USSR.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's also the Finnish leftist mindset today.
        >noo you can't pull out of the Ottawa treaty! Your fascist mines could kill refugees and innocent Russian children!

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Your fascist mines could kill refugees and innocent Russian children!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Collectivist never fail to be insufferable gays

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That was Finnish leftist mindset during the Cold War they argued against civilian nuclear bunkers because they're apparently a provocation against USSR.

      It's also the Finnish leftist mindset today.
      >noo you can't pull out of the Ottawa treaty! Your fascist mines could kill refugees and innocent Russian children!

      If these "leftists" you speak of were communists then it makes perfect sense, commies are materialists, they think matter can talk and think. So to them if you have mines you WILL use them. If you build a defensive line you WILL use it. If you have money, you WILL spend it. If you have a gun you WILL shoot it at someone. Keep this in mind and it all starts making sense.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Deng: I am sure that the Soviet Union will not stop in Afghanistan if we do not stop them. And it’s next target will be either Iran or Pakistan. And, even if it’s not possible to know which of these two countries they will choose first, I think it’s important to concentrate our attention on Iran.

        Fallaci: But don’t you think that the drama of the American hostages, the chaos in which Iran is drowning, the madness of Khomeini and his followers — in short, what has happened in that country over the last ten months — is an advantage for the Soviets?

        >Deng: Listen, I don’t understand what is happening down there very well. I can tell you only that Iran is not just a hot spot; it’s boiling. Let’s not forget that the Soviet Union has a very strong influence in Iran. Eh! — very strong. And this should show you why we have every intention of maintaining the best possible relations with Iran. Whatever happens in Iran, you will see that a Chinese embassy in Tehran will be very useful.

        Fallaci: It wasn’t very useful to the Americans.

        >Deng: The Americans are completely incapable of doing anything in Iran. But the heart of the matter, as I see it, is not Iran; it is war — the inevitability of war. I am not talking about Iran; I am asserting that war will break out, sooner or later. And whoever thinks differently is making a tragic mistake, because they are failing to enact effective measures. But really! — the Soviet Union talks about the SALT agreements incessantly, and yet it never stops arming itself. Its collection of atomic bombs and nuclear weapons is incredible, and its armories are filling up with conventional weapons. These weapons are not food; they are not shoes; they are not clothes; they are not things that will spoil if not consumed immediately. Sooner or later, they will be used.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Why would Luol Deng be talking about iranian politics?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          source?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >when you can post ~80 year old political cartoons and they are still as relevant as ever
        Russia, Russia never changes.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    mighty russian bear will not stand for these offensive provocations against russian peoplez...!

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bunkers?
    Albania likes that! Build hundreds of bunkers first, take Kosovo a few decades later. This is the way!

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Clearly a warcrime and a violation of Russian independence, Russia has no choice but to go to war
    Send the VDV to drop into the Gulf of Riga and the mobiks to charge the bunkers

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    More like Russia does not have balls to fight NATO, and if it had they would find out that it does not matter if their nukes work or not because Moscow is a glass crater before they can even think about firing one.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Its against rapefugees

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >russia is awfully stuck in ukraine
    >everybody else starts bunkering up and building fortifications
    russians are almost as bad at international politics as the germans.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    WaLLS dOn'T WoRk

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Mines do.
      Aslo underground bunkers to hide your artillery and stuff.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Mines do.
        Mined NATO eastern border when!?
        A buffer zone must be created from NATO up to the urals, its the only way to be sure!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      they work against thirdies

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It is worth it, total annihilation of the whole russian population that took part in attacking the west without provocation.

    Thus, the main antagonist in the axis of evil will fall, once again.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Russia has to attack the first because NATO is not an offensive organization regardless what turdies might think.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      At this point, Russia has attrited themselves in Ukraine to a point where they couldn't face Europe, even without US joining. And in 1-2 years more of this attrition, they'd be unable to capture the Suwalki gap even against Balts+Poles alone.
      But they've put themselves in such a corner that they still might want to try. In such a case, rest assured they'd desperately try to make it look like they are attacked first.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Dude. With Russias performance in 2022? They were never in any position to face Europe in the first place.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Be the NATO turdies want you to be

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >doesn't understand the concept of deterrence
    are you a woman?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Women excel at deterrence.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Top of the morning, sar

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The ever-elusive Irish Indian..

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Up the RA(jeesh)!

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    how many times has a NATO member state been attacked since its creation?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Do things outside of NATO jurisdiction like the Falklands War count?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Obviously not.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >substantially fewer times than the times NATO bombed random shitholes around the globe
    fewer than 0? seems hard to achieve.
    fun fact: countries that are part of NATO doing things != NATO doing things

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Remind me, how many NATO countries were "defended" from aggression
    All of them
    European NATO Countries Russians invaded since NATO creation: 0 (zero).
    European countries Russians invaded since NATO creation: you do the count.

    NATO stops Russian aggression dead in its tracks. There is nothing like NATO that makes Russians seethe helplessly so much.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nice

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >muh goatfrickers
    So what you're saying is NATO will utterly rapestomp the entire russian military in a week, occupy all of Russia, dissolve the russian government and imprison or execute vast swathes of the current ruling class and then occupy Russia for 2+ decades before leaving and letting them sort it out themselves again.

    Sounds fun.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The saddest part is that us allowing them to self govern is their best cope

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        even sadder they think we wont dissolve russia

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How much does putin eat up his own propaganda? Do generals really just go
    >yes, Mein Monke, we are winning against banderite troony israeli nazi HATO mercenaries, our hundreds of thousands of functional tanks can defeat little Baltics, please open a second front.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    About fricking time.
    Defensive tacticool nooks when!?

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    My sweet summer child, when did NATO declare itself as offensive alliance?
    As for offensive nature of the USSR they literally had communism as a goal in their Constitution.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Nah, why bother with the expense when the Ukrainians are already grindin g the Russian Army into dust with just some couch money and a few gift baskets of surplus euqipment. It's win-win: More profitable for the west, and much more humiliating for Russia.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I don't understand, you've just given me three examples of operations that NATO is not in any way involved in and this is somehow an example of NATO being bad?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >an example of NATO being bad
      inb4seething Serboids

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Putin is as quickly forgotten
    He's not, though. You're just being a moron and are making the utterly moronic assumption that NATO and its members can only do one thing at a time.

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >we lost to goatfricker
    You realize that Russians also "lost to goatfrickers", right? I swear you people are the stupidest morons alive, you can't even come up with arguments which don't contradict themselves.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Russia lost exponentially harder to them too.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You're right. With how hard Russias balls are being crushed by the Ukrainians with just a litte western aid, they won't be recovering this half of the century.

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >burgers doing burger things and blowing up goatfrickers
    >NATO BAD!!!!!111111

    >commie russkis getting blown up by goatfrickerss
    >WOAH, SO ZAZED ZISTERS!!!!!!111

    inb4 THAT DOESN'T COUNT!!!!!111

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You didn't address my arguments.
    Try again, child.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    When will you start using the toilet instead of the streets?

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Please let Russia be dumb enough to "invade" Alaska.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That would leave a big chunk of land up for grabs west of the Urals considering how much hardware would be needed to even attempt that 🙂

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They have no means to do that.
      They have 0 infrastructure that far East.
      Those fancy landing craft they have are stuck in NATO Sea.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Of course NATO can do two things at a time: do nothing effective and scratch its ass
    >t. ztard whose government is so terrified of NATO involvement that they are completely cucked and don't dare lift a finger to strike NATO aid pouring into Ukraine and killing 10s of thousands of Russian soldiers

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    No, because the americans forced them into collapsing you mong

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Well that's nice, vatBlack person. Meanwhile, Russia it seems can only do one thing: Die slowly.

    It seems western global hegemony is secured for another century, given the incompetence of all it's loudmouthed wannabe-rivals. Much like (You), Russia, China, India etc. remian all bark and no bite while anyone daring to militarily attack NATO or the West is then smashed into pieces and thrown into dissarray for decades at a minimum.

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Russian people have thousands of years of history and culture! You must respect us!
    >USSR? Nothing to do with us

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      About 1400 years total. Not "thousands".

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Moscow was only founded in the midst of the 12th century. They still need over a full century for their first millennium.

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >ztards have to celebrate downing one (1) drone with 150,000 Russians KIA
    When will Putin find his balls and strike NATO supply convoys into Ukraine? We're all waiting.

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Ha, we destroyed US drone. We totall avenged those 300,000 dead Russians trying and failing to take our neighbor.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe we can do the tally of US aircraft downed by brave strong Russian action vs Russian aircraft downed by US-supplied air defense systems, kek

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The US can just build another one. We aren't Russia where we need to go crying to Iran and North Korea for weapons

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    How is wagner by the way? What happened when they attacked Americans in Syria again? Whatever the case, I'm sure the musicians will turn the tide and be remembered forever as heroes.

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Two more red lines!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Is just many gestures of good will, da?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Should NATO be doing something about all these threats?
      Special Russian demilitarization operation, yes?

  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Meanwhile, Boris Johnson has personally destroyed 500 tanks, several oil refinery's, and the Russian flagship.

  42. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    no because it collapsed after losing to goatfrickers

  43. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >The drone was a wink to NATO, which is totally not part of the war. No, sir.
    This is always a great cope. I would love to understand the vatnik thought process here. We all know NATO is giving supplies and ISR to Ukraine, but what's the fevered vatnik mind saying here, that NATO is also participating in the war directly but somehow not taking any casualties?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >somehow not taking any casualties?
      What are you talking about, anon? NATO has lost 5 million of their Demon infantry and even more of their hyper-dimensional tanks powered by the aborted fetuses of white, christian, unwed mothers.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      To them what NATO is doing is participaing directly in the war, yes. It's not a question of just idiocy, its a question of the different meanings of "participating directly".

  44. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >They did take 20% of Ukraine, though
    Which is an embarrassing performance for "the second military of the world", and they took most of that 10 years ago.
    >Still holding ground, too
    less and less ground lmao

  45. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Cool. You gonna ignore that Russian pilot getting cussed out by his co-pilot for almost shooting an English jet?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      "almost" doesn't count, anon. think cuban crisis - it was avoided, so it's all fine

  46. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >WE DOWNED A PLATFORM EXPRESSLY CREATED TO BE DISPOSABLE BECAUSE ITS LOSS DOES NOT INVOLVE THE LOSS OF HUMAN LIFE! THE WEST HAS FALLEN, RUSSIA HAS WON

  47. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >And ukrainian loses are a small fraction of Russian losses
    FTFY

    >The drone was a wink to NATO
    And the western equipment killing tens of thousands of vatBlack folk was a wink to Russia.

  48. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >this is what ztards actually believe
    No wonder your government is putting up one of the worst military performances of the past fifty years.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >past fifty years
      Of all time. 2nd army of the world cant beat the poorest country in Europe LMAO.

  49. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Like, I know this is just translations in English not doing Russian justly, but God, I wish this is actually what they were saying. An entire language of nonsensical metaphors

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Every language has phrases that don't translate well directly (It's raining cats and dogs), but russia absolutely has the weirdest ones.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          My favorite was when I visited Japan for work (My company has an office in Tokyo) and I used the word "Dipshit" in conversation. Suddenly, three of the 4 people I;m talking to all break out their phones to translate "Dipshit". It was quite surreal.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            We had Japanese exchange students in High School. Swearing in front of them was always fun, because they'd very quietly mutter it back and forth between themselves before realizing you were cursing and then start giggling.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Make that the cat wise

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Go read some Dostoevsky if you really want a laugh

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I mean, they make sense in the language. That's how languages work.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Like, I know this is just translations in English not doing Russian justly, but God, I wish this is actually what they were saying. An entire language of nonsensical metaphors

      If the meaning of the phrase is to willingly (or knowingly) accept facts which disguise a more pressing reality then I totally get it.

      Like "is the war going well?" being answered with "our troops outnumber the enemy". Some people would happily accept that as an answer even if they knew it didn't answer the question.

      Any Russian speakers confirm what the phrase means?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >If the meaning of the phrase is to willingly (or knowingly) accept facts which disguise a more pressing reality
        I think it's just a fancier way of saying "drop the fricking copium, shit's fricked"

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yes but I'm wondering whether it refers to any deception, or self-deception. And whether the information needs to be true or false, or it doesn't matter.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            He's talking about "taking sedatives", so I'd say it's about self-deception to distort reality and make it more bearable.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Dude, it's "copium"

  50. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Yeah, nah. Giving the ukies the tools to do the job is an important contribution and deserves credit. NATO is killing the Russian Army just by providing a bit of charity. Really drives home how utterly outclassed Russia is.

  51. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >and the talibans were armed with russian AKs.
    Nah.

  52. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    uh-huh. and the mujahideens were armed with american M1s. a little bit of charity and russia leaves (got poor or whatever).
    i'm fine with that. charity is cool.

  53. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >uh-huh. and the talibans were armed with russian AKs.
    Yeah. The ones they took off of the soviet soldiers they killed by the thousands and thousands. LMAO.

  54. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    At best it'll be a Mannerheim line

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This. The goal won't be to stonewall Russia, just delay them 48 hours until NATO b***hslaps glorious Russian army with airpower and rapid reaction forces.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      So to Russians it will be an impregnable fortress. To quote Molotov from his speech after the Winter War.
      >"the Finnish authorities had erected numerous strong reinforced concrete and granite-ground fortifications armed with artillery and machine guns. The number of these fortifications ran into many hundreds. These military fortifications, particularly, reinforced concrete structures of high military strength, with their underground thoroughfares, surrounded by special anti-tank trenches and granite pillars, supported by a set-up of countless mine fields, constituted what was known as the "Mannerheim Line" which was constructed under the supervision of appropriate foreign experts to bear a likeness to the "Maginot Line" and "Siegfried Line". It should be mentioned that these fortifications were up till now considered as impregnable i.e. as fortifications never broken through by any army."

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It was amusing quite because in reality it was basically just some foxholes and trenches, maybe fortified with cement here and there.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Maginfaux Line

  55. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >20%
    12%. Drop the Crimea cope. That was not taken by "Russian might" in 2022.

  56. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    This guy's posting style absolutely oozes seethe, it's quite funny.

  57. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Between that and killing russians, its honestly a good year to be a tax payer. In russia and pajeetistan do you just pay them so big bad daddy popo doesnt rape you again?

  58. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    How do you fricking Black folk not comprehend that "countries that are NATO members doing things" =/= "NATO doing things"? How is that so hard to comprehend??
    If you are in the chess club and Billy is in the chess club and you decide to play checkers after class, that is not the chess club playing checkers as an institution, that is you and Billy playing checkers. But I guess having actual agency and autonomy is also incomprehensible for a turdie.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You're missing the typical quasi-communist way of seeing things these people have, where NATO is just a vehicle through which the biggest super-structure, the most powerful monolith, does things. Yes, it's a macro-focused worldview where agency, individuality doesn't exist and and everything is determined and planned. You know, like Russia imagines itself and how things were "supposed" to be ran like in the USSR.

      You're dealing with a proper third worlder, my friend. To him America = most powerful so if they're part of NATO that just means NATO is just a vehicle for the US to act. Russia sees itself this way too, but them being the driving motor of things like East Europe and the CSAT so of course they treat "allies" and neighbours like slaves they're dominating. They see the US as doing the same thing because that's their whole view of what relations between groups is like.

      Dominated-Submissive, Powerful-Weak, Opressor-Oppressed. It's how they see the world and life itself.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Also, Russians like to think of themselves as a super power (yes, I know…), and their idea is that only super powers can truly have personal agency in the world. For them, it’s inconceivable that smaller nations could have their opinions or individual actions without a super power forcing them to act so.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, but less in terms of personal agency and more in terms of collective, material agency. Russia and the US gets to dictate things because they have more, the smaller collectives (Estonia, Latvia etc) doesn't get to say shit. This is why they genuinely see what we're seeing in Ukraine and fully interpret it as the United States fighting them directly.

          They're not seeing something we're not seeing. They don't know more than we do. It's in fact, a different perspective and hence, interpretation of the same information and situation. Putin, Gerasimov, Shoigu, Mededev, they're are NOT people like you and me. They don't see the way we see. To them, a Ukrainian soldier in a Bradley or an Abrams tank might as well be an actual American soldier.

          Keep this in mind and you also understand all the pussy bullshit regarding giving Ukraine military gear and equipment. Yes, they ones feeling this way are pussies but their sensitivity makes them more privy to the way the ex-KGB mobsters ruling Russia see this war.

          In fact, I'd go as far as saying that Putin doesn't just see himself fighting a war against the United States and NATO today. He seems himself fighting a war against the US and NATO since, at least 2014. Maybe since Georgia.

  59. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It is and will forever remain rightful ukrainian clay. Cope and seethe more, vatBlack person.

  60. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Crimea is Ukrainian.
    the cope is saying capturing it is an example of the ""successes"" of the 2022 invasion

  61. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'm ready

  62. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I can't wait for the day king monke finally snaps and tries to hit a NATO country. Watching Russia be turned to rubble in a day will be 500 years of comeuppance for those humanoid rats.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      won't happen lol
      1. russia won't* attack a NATO country. why get into a nuclear war over that?
      2. if Russia attacked a NATO country nobody cares about (like a baltic state), NATO countries won't* send in armies. again, why get into a nuclear war over a tiny baltic shithole? the article 5 response will be to send material aid but not any personnel

      *here, won't is like a 99.99% probability or so that it doesn't happen.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Already a done deal that Baltics will be defended. Maybe US will only send planes/missiles in and give satellite info support if Trump gets elected. But most European NATO countries have tripwire troops already on the ground and those are numbers are being currently increased. These troops are there to facilitate a rapid troop transfer into the area if war comes.
        Nobody realistically thinks nukes will be used.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Nobody realistically thinks nukes will be used.
          The entire danger in such a scenario is that nukes would conceivably get used. The danger that Russia presents in any kind of Baltic land grab isn't that they defeat NATO in a conventional war, but that precisely BECAUSE victory in a conventional sense would be impossible that nukes and the threat of escalation become the primary way Russia would seek to win the confrontation. If Putin did decide to try to take the Baltics it wouldn't be because he thinks that NATO doesn't have the conventional might to defend them, but that politicians in the West would be unwilling to risk Berlin over Riga, and the way to make this threat serious would be limited and tactical nuclear strikes with the overt threat that any further NATO response will be met with strategic strikes. It's exactly a situation where nukes COULD get used.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I mean, it’s possible that they could try that, and it’s also possible that western politicians are too soft, but rationally thinking you can’t really bend to nuclear extortion because bending doesn’t remove the means of extortion. I agree that numes guard Russia from the kind of flattening it would otherwise receive by starting a war, but the idea that someone makes a landgrab and then holds that grabbed land through nuclear extortion alone would instantly crush the current world order, send a message that *everyone* needs to get nukes because they’re the only real security guarantee left.

            It would be a dangerous situation, especially if Russians really believed their own ”xaxaxa are you hato warmongers ready to start a nuclear war over this plot of the land, how can you be so evil” kool-aid.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >especially if Russians really believed their own ”xaxaxa are you hato warmongers ready to start a nuclear war over this plot of the land, how can you be so evil” kool-aid.

              If? Funny you still have that much faith in them by this point.

              Anyway, have this very blessed image.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            the moment you allow a nuclear strike to go unpunished is the moment you allow a hundred. everyone in the world has an interest in keeping that status quo.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >if Russia attacked a NATO country nobody cares about (like a baltic state), NATO countries won't* send in armies. again, why get into a nuclear war over a tiny baltic shithole? the article 5 response will be to send material aid but not any personnel
        Given how much it's been wargamed it'd be political suicide to not come to their defense. Russia banking on the alliance not doing shit is so fricking moronic, especially when we know that "not helping baltic shitholes" is just another way of saying "we'll keep going until you do something"

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Also there's no need to nuke anything. That's what Russia will try to find an excuse to do, instead. If they attack, all that's happening is the F-35s raping the air defense and air radar that Russia has, then raping their artillery with a combined 4th gen fleet. Then the ground forces and logistics suffer their deletion right after.
          What happens after that depends on if Russia wants to commit suicide or not.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I would have thought about a scenario of some NATO countries chickening out before the Ukraine war, but not now. Russia has lost too much already to look frightening to NATO.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The reason why it'd be moronic not to push a full defense is also because it'd push down faith in NATO as a whole. If all but the core members of NATO stop having trust in NATO because of a botched genuine defense in a land war (all previous NATO actions have always been in less extreme circumstances, e.g 9/11) that just fricks over the point of the alliance as a whole.
            Why be in NATO if NATO doesn't do shit to stop the very thing it was meant for? It's a completely moronic delusion that could only work if a bunch of Russian fraudster parties took over every NATO country.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >could only work if a bunch of Russian fraudster parties took over every NATO country
              But they have, though it took them half a century to infiltrate. We are in really deep shit.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                We're in the rooting out process currently.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >NATO countries won't* send in armies
        there are already forces from other NATO states in the baltics moron, unless Russia has a plan to teleport them out before invading

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Not to mention that the usual NATO response for Russian force build up near baltics would be to increase the forces there and run "practice training" with tens of thousands of troops.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You could build a pretty big skull throne out of the heads of all the shithole tyrants who thought the west wouldn't honour their alliances and died for that mistake.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >again, why get into a nuclear war over a tiny baltic shithole?
        Good question Vladimir, why get Russia into a nuclear war over a tiny Baltic shithole?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        No anon, nobody is interested in appeasing Russia anymore. If they touch NATO, we kill you all.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >why get into a nuclear war over a tiny baltic shithole? the article 5 response will be to send material aid but not any personnel
        You really are fricking stupid but I don;t expect much from someone who can't even understand the very basic concept of NATO. Why the frick do you third world morons even fricking post here? You have zero insight or understanding and come across as borderline moronic. Does whatever shithole you are from even have sewers? You third world morons ruined the fricking internet.

        >if Russia attacked a NATO country nobody cares about (like a baltic state), NATO countries won't* send in armies
        You stupid fricking simpleton, you utter moron, your moron.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No need to nuke anything, nukes are bad. They're always bad. I'll make a call to my friend Putin, he's a great leader, he'll understand. I'll negotiate a great deal that will benefit both of our great nations. A very great deal.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Who said anything about nukes? NATO could turn the entirety of Moscow and St Petersburg into a parking lot with conventional weapons, and there's not a damn thing ziggers could do about it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Trump could easily be one of the greatest academics of the United States with how much he speaks and says nothing.

  63. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Russia being the nazi germany reincarnate will attempt to use the same tactics and use their navy to flank.

    Are you ready for the last russian mobik of the Baltic invasion fleet to die of dysentery off the coast of Madagascar after they fail to land a single soul on the beaches?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They might be dumb enough to try Z-day somewhere, but you can’t die of dysentery if someone sinks you before you get to land.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Its funny you come with this dumb narrative straight from the headlines when they'll likely just do what they did last time they, you know, invaded the Baltics themselves.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_the_Baltic_states

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >when they'll likely just do what they did last time
        Pressure baltics to let in unspecified amount of russian troops to "guard against nazis"? The last time invasion was basically political shitshow from baltics and if they had actually fought against soviets they could probably have fought them to standstill like Finland did.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Baltics were ruled by traitors, as always.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I mean, they certainly try to at least plan for that with all the political meddling they do inside the Baltics.

          [...]
          >lost
          >dominated two countries on the other side of the planet, kills a million people there, and lost only 7000 people
          >in two whole decades
          Meanwhile Russia loses more men than the US did in 20 years, in individual battles. This is a win, because Russians still have not learned that losing more men than the enemy doesn't mean you are better than them.

          Reminder that the state the US made after defeating Saddamn is still standing and so is the respective armed forces of that state.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/aBTnUGO.jpg

        I mean, they certainly try to at least plan for that with all the political meddling they do inside the Baltics.

        [...]
        Reminder that the state the US made after defeating Saddamn is still standing and so is the respective armed forces of that state.

        As a Lithuanian, let me give you some context.

        It all relied on our then dictatorship gaining power and whole Vilnius debacle, and us alienating Weimar republic, and later on nazis as well. We basically had no allies, and since Soviet union was a new entity, we sort of thought they can be reasonable. We were politically immature as well, and thus our politicians were morons being wiretapped by soviets 24/7.
        After molotov-ribbentrop, they gave us a factitious treaty with false promises, which our morons believed, which let soviet union station in some troops. Then, Ultimatum came, and when taken into consideration troops were already in the country, we knew it's impossible to win. If we haven't taken in the troops earlier and refused the treaty and be invaded, we probably would've survived. We had army of 150k in active service back then, as much tanks as France at that point, as well as our own self-sufficient military-industrial complex. We also manufactured most modern bomber and recon planes in Europe, used by both soviets and nazis (ANBO).

        That's why post 1990 Lithuania was built on different grounds. Give no quarter to Russians, never trust them, and try to interact with them as little as possible.
        Our Army and paramilitaries were also made politically independent; Our army actually has a directive to fight no matter what, even if politicians would surrender. We won't get occupied ever again, because we won't survive it. And the army doctrine, autonomy and society trust in it also exemplifies that.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          That's very interesting. Also very laudable. I wish other countries had that much compromise in defending themselves. Too bad about the horror show with your politicians back then though.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          How has Lithuania been able to keep the pidor out so consistently, even during soviet times? Latvia is like more than a quarter pidorized, and Estonia isn't far behind.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Unironically brutality against soviet colonizers and soldiers, and our own commies being somewhat disillusioned with Moscow and it's policies.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Less industrialisation than the other Baltics + a bit higher population made it unnecessary to import foreign labour. Our partisans were also more brutal, numerous and better organised, thus making us unattractive for sovoks to immigrate to. And our commie-in-chief was a nazbol through and through.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Nazbol

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >nazbol
              Meme ideology among meme ideologies.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >We had army of 150k in active service back then, as much tanks as France at that point, as well as our own self-sufficient military-industrial complex.
          What have you been smoking your active army was about 25k,police 4k, border guard 3.5k and 55k in self-protection unit. You had about 120 field artillery (french 75mm) what were very outdated allready back then and 1 tank battalion with 27 Renault FT and some Carden Loyd tankettes not sure how many. number.
          Your text is reliable as " I don't care what they tell you in school, Cleopatra was Black".

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            And you write like a thirdie kek, i see you got too mad about being dunked on in the other thread

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            pff, our carden lloyd tanks had actual guns, and radios

  64. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Sure, vanya, old rugged soviet losttech is still useful lol

  65. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It's the worlds most expensive bird, cloud, dust, everything detection system.

    A mk2 eyeball is more reliable.

  66. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >You know vatniks use VHF 2m wavelength radars, right? It's an old technology not used in the west, but it doesn't give a frick about stealth.
    Oh shit, they'll know some small bees are flying along the horizon.
    Too bad they can't actually triangulate the location of those planes with the "paired" radars that work in higher frequencies and will thus still not target anything.
    Reminder: Russia does not have stealth technology. They have ZERO (ZILCH, NADA, 0!!!!!!!) ability to even TEST anti-stealth technology.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Reminder russia honestly believes su57, a plane with exposed engines, rivets, 0 stealth plane made for outmanouvering bf109's is a stealth plane since their radars have trouble picking that up.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >It should also be added that radars operating in the meter range have an additional advantage that their designers probably did not expect. Radio waves of this length have different scattering characteristics than waves in the microwave range, which means that the currently used techniques of reduced radar detection ( stealth ) have little effectiveness against them. Paradoxically, it turned out that the methods of reducing the detectability of aircraft by radar means, developed since the mid-1970s, do not protect them from detection using radars operating in ranges abandoned in the West due to their inferior parameters.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, they'll see something in the general direction of the horizon and won't be able to target it or even know how fast it's moving.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Modern meter wave radars like russian 1L119 Nebo-SW have ability to track an object in 3d with ~30m accuracy. That's enough.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        As evidenced by this image, these supposed HATO """""stealth""""" fighters are plain by day when hit with 400-700nm radio waves rendering them completely inept and exposing stupid western technological inferiority.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          alright that got a good laugh out of me

  67. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    The audacity to say this while the pride and joy of the third world is committing national suicide broadcasted in hd.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I don't even know what the frick are you trying to say, i'm not even a vatnik, serb or pajeet lol. I want russia to end in nuclear hellfire my homie. People neglecting enemy capabilities are absolute fools. You're one of them.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Their capabilities have been degraded to the point where they are irrelevant. Theyre struggling to produce 80s shit while we're working on ngad with 1k f35s already in service. The gap is just fricking wild.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          That doesn't really matter when we're talking about taking over the Baltics. Their zerg rush tactics with ancient T-80s may well be enough for conquering those countries

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Those countries are in NATO and has stuff like F-35.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Estonia and Latvia have jack fricking shit

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You forget Lithuania, which does have some shit, as well as military industrial complex, aka they produce their own rockets, drones, anti drone stuff and gun ammo.
                Which also has German batallion, American bases and Nato coalition troops on permanent basis. Which also has about 130k troops if we include active reserve, paramilitary and active service.
                Not to mention, Baltics are part of Baltoscandia so Nordics will join in, as well as Poland and afteromentioned countries which has troops in it.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Nordics will join in
                The Nordics have next to no force projection capability right now, not even to areas close by like the Baltics

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Didn't the Nordics reach some kind of agreement to pool their entire air force together for military deployments? That's an air fleet of hundreds of fighters alone.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, pooled into a force of 250 planes.

                https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2023/03/24/nordic-countries-move-toward-linking-their-air-forces-250-planes/

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Doesn't work in Ukraine so it absolutely would not work against Nato countries.
            They can't do zerg rushes because western air superiority would just slaughter them all.

  68. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Russia showing themselves to be absolutely incompetent for 2 years just means that no one will be afraid to curb stomp them when they hit the tripwire.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      if you think Russia is incompetent, wait until you see NATO. I remember some highlights from NATO instructors training Ukrainian troops.
      >A minefield? Just go around it, minefields are just 100 meters wide right?
      >Um, drones in combat? Sorry idk anything about that

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        yeah I'd hate to see NATO

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          By the way, in any realistic scenario nowadays the Nighthawks here would be replaced by a frickton of F-35s, probably aided by a vanguard of F-22s and then a final set of B-2s rushing into shit all over Russian airfields.
          Then the F-15s, F-16s, Eurodoritos and the rest roll in to complete the enshittening, and then Russia can only cry nooooook.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >even included the lone MiG-25
          zozzle

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous
          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That's pretty good. Should be narrated by some western solovyov (alex jones?) for better effect

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Alex Jones

              Please. NATO has an actual budget. We get Morgan Freeman

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >implying it's propaganda
              the only unrealistic part of that webm is that we'd let King Monke go to trial

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Alex wouldn't do it, the script doesn't include any mention of LGTBQ individuals or supplements.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Tucker Carlson would be a better fit. Plus, he's the type of grifter that'd gladly ignore the years of Russia shilling if the appropriate paycheck was given.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >MAGA communism
                Really?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Joe McCarthy would be rolling in his grave if he saw that.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Last time I remember Jonesy was shilling for pidorstan.

  69. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Russian vodka magic VHF radars "detect" the F-35s as blotches covering a significant tract of the sky
    >"nah i'd win da" the russian says as his nebo-m radar turns on and tries to gain a lock for his AA missile, but since the F-35s are stealth, these other radars completely fail to detect the plane
    >F-35 enters 40km range, drops HARM and annihilates the S-400 before it can even gain enough of a radar return to even hope to target the plane
    >rinse and repeat until Russia has no air defense

  70. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I hope they attack the Baltics, I really want to see English, Italian, Norwegian and Danish F-35 squadrons flying together to absolutely dab on the dysgenics.

  71. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >you're completely wrong here. lower-frequency radars are accurate enough to get an active radar homing missile close enough to a stealth fighter to lock on to it.
    Lol sure

  72. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    When you are an complete fricking idiot, you, yourself are fine to you but it is everyone around you who truly suffers.

    Same happens when you are dead.

  73. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Nebo-SVU (also known as 1L119) (in Cyrillic: Heбo-CBУ, 1Л119) is a very high frequency multi-functional radar and first radar with an active electronically scanned array antenna operating in the metric wavelength. It can locate aircraft or other flying object with 0.1 m2 radar cross-section at 100 km (62 mi).
    >0.1m^2 RCS
    >0.1m^2 RCS
    >0.1m^2 RCS
    Damn son, they only need to improve it 100-1000x to see a F35 dropping glide bombs on it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I really wouldn't want to turn that obsolete "SEAD me" beacon on if I knew enemy had anything newer than 90s tech.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'm glad wikipedia has true and up to date info.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You're welcome they even have a cite for it: https://www.arms-expo.ru/news/novye-razrabotki/rls-1l119-nebo-svu-/

        That's the manufacturer's official advertising specs so knowing Russia the actual performance could be worse. Thirdie.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah I sure as shit would trust Russia's superior specs, except those are Russian specs and they tell us that they suck even before the trademark russian corruption

  74. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    At this point it doesn't matter if stealth works or not. NATO airforce and navy would dominate by sheer numbers.

  75. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Do you honestly believe russians can defend their airspace when drones hit their gas infrastructure in fricking St Petersburg?

  76. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Youre getting the way these two sides lie about specs mixed up so I'll help you
    >west: lies about specs, stuff is better than published info
    >russia: lies about specs, stuff is way worse than published info

  77. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How the frick are people still shilling Russian IADS when it cannot entirely deny the airspace to a military flying barely updated Soviet era MiGs and Flankers. For fricks sakes Storm Shadow has been shitting on Russian IADS for a while now. Are people really so knobheaded to believe the USAF could not, at the bare minimum, conduct operations at the same level as the Ukrainians have these last two years? Like really Ivan, you're going to tell me some Ukrainians in ratty old Su-24s with a radar cross section the size of a fricking barn can launch cruise missile strikes against S-300/400 sites but the US cannot? Really? Even assuming
    >muh smekalka VHF radar
    can detect stealthy aircraft you mean to tell me the Russians would shoot down all of the Amerkkkanskis but somehow when faced with a handful of Soviet scrapheaps they can't do the same? 2 years in?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, that's the thing. Unless Russia has magically been holding back for no reason there's basically no evidence their AA isn't completely unfit to fight stealth aircraft.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Also, I think the performances are quite telling. Ukraine seems to be able to shoot rockets at Russia with abandon but Russia's own rocket assaults are shot down ad infinitium. Comparing western AA to Russian AA is a different ball-game from what we've been shown.
        They might have a lot of AA, but no way am I believing it's anywhere near good enough to do what is advertised.

  78. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    How many times have you posted this image since it was taken?

  79. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >everything in this image was recovered
    >even if it wasn't, the point is moot because it's not even NATO forces and none of these were used in Desert Storm.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What do you think ODS means in m2a2 bradley ODS that ukrainians recieved?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Sorry anon I don't speak third worlder.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You apparently do

  80. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Maginot did the job, actually. It's just that the point of failure where nothing was built was seen as provocative, as it would be akin to build a wall against Belgium, and Belgians would be in the right not liking it. Also mountains, but that was only part of it, there were mountainous bits elsewhere after all, which didn't prevent the Maginot line to be built on these parts.
    It's too bad that it failed, as it sucked up a lot of resources, time and money that could've been put into other uses for war preparations. If it was completed from north to south, it would probably have been successful, or at least moderately.

  81. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >implying they would need to make any numbers public to advertize
    homie you realize they can just get countries to evaluate their program and give them confidential information to advertize when they do right?
    what kind of moron would think they would put any useful info out in the open?

  82. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Ofcourse, if even a moron like you knows what band and wavelength they use, no way the people who actually got an education, would know about it and account for it in the design.

    You sir, are a moron and a bellend.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No u

  83. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >he really thinks the west is going to design a stealth jet that can easily be spotted by their own adversaries anceint radar

  84. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You understand there's already thousands of US troops over there right? Yeah, maybe the politicians are too pussy. Will they keep being pussies after hundreds of US troops die at the hands of Russians?

    https://i.imgur.com/z3MiMCF.jpg

    Tucker Carlson would be a better fit. Plus, he's the type of grifter that'd gladly ignore the years of Russia shilling if the appropriate paycheck was given.

    Get the frick outta here, Carlson sounds like a pussy, he wears bowties. He doesn't have them madman Texan voice Jones has.

  85. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How will it help when these two clowns will let Russia move through their countries?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Russia will have to actually reach those two countries first lmfao

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Do you know where those countries are anon?

      Russia could not even secure Kiev, which is within walking distance of the point they invaded from. So how exactly are they going to make it to Hungary?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Move through
      Yea, they will stay

  86. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >lost
    >dominated two countries on the other side of the planet, kills a million people there, and lost only 7000 people
    >in two whole decades
    Meanwhile Russia loses more men than the US did in 20 years, in individual battles. This is a win, because Russians still have not learned that losing more men than the enemy doesn't mean you are better than them.

  87. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >if I was a politician who wasn't too inclined on sending a bunch of my country's troops to death, I'd be biased towards the second option.
    Frog or israelite?

  88. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >we may live to see mobiks charging concrete forts
    grim

  89. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    this thread in an ass shell
    >CSTO didnt help armenia
    >that means NATO wont help balts

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >CSTO didnt help armenia
      Just means that NATO gained a friend.

  90. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Baltic
    Let me guess, they contracted a Russian company to build it

  91. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >"Americans building trenches around copebelt"

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *