LESS THAN ONE FUCKING DAY!

And this is a *Russian* source.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it also includes copious cope stripes

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      remember the days of the cope squares which covered half of Ukraine? kek

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Ah yes. “We yeeted a cruise missile into a field 50km away so this territory is contested”

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The anus is gapping

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Thh gag reflex is building.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Thh gag reflex is building.

      The air fryer is warming

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The eyebrow has been singed off

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      the troony is dilating

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The dick is shitting.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        kek saved

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous
  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    A few weeks from now the macro frontlines-over-time videos will start to emerge. If only to emphasise the pace of Russian progress the last few months.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >if I paint a thin corridor of cope stripes to Balalaika, it means we haven't lost it!
    >no need to panic

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Very good Ukraine
    HOWEVER

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >south pincer cut off
      >south pincer going right through a marsh
      Actually, I would love to see this happen.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Can you imagine watching them try to get through that swamp?
        Frick it would be insane to watch.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >4 river crossings
      Kek

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >>4 river crossings
        DO YOU WANT A TOTAL PONTOON?!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Za Caoldronu...
      the Kiev-Kharkiv omega-feint was in the plan all along...
      Putin sama... I kneel...

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >We wanted st Petersburg to become an independent state anyway, it never truly understood the Russian vision.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Vatnik
      >Geography
      Choose one

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          People forget Ukraine has the advantage of top tier NATO intelligence. Russia's strength in this war has been in massive numbers, not once has it been craftiness. You'd have to be on krokodil to think Russia has something up their sleve that isn't known already. In the meanwhile, if they lose their numbers advantage by wasting units, they'll be properly fricked.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Also those conscripted DPR/LNR troops will pull this off easy

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/vy6m00m.png

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        would probably be 300% more effective than the Russhits are rn

        Of course we will give our Latvian allies F-35, Minutemen IV and SR-72 to help accomplish their great peacekeeping endeavor against the Russian Terrorist state.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Is this Latvian humor? Also what's with the a1's

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Latvians don't use Cyrillic. It's clearly from a Russian show of some kind. Could be comedy, news, anything really.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The famous Savyntsi feint will be known for decades.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        How can Ukraine compete with such tactical genius? It's just not fair.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This maneuver will be known in military parlance as the "Klink Dipsy Doodle!"

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Checkm8 rooski

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Two pontooning

      Aaaaaaaa!!!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Caludron is back on the menu

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >t: when Rybar paints ukrainian victories, he's cool.
    >when he doesn't, he's an FSB project/vatBlack person
    Mhm.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You can do the math anon

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He is a vatBlack person. Thus, them reporting Ukrainian victories is damning. I know logic isn't vatBlack folk' strong suit, but try to keep up.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      have a nice day you fricking autist, we're not saying he's cool, we're saying that the russoid "army" is so shit that even your homosexual propagandists have to admit they're shit. they can't even spin it any other way. i fricked your mother's throat.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >he has a clear R*ssian bias
      >DESPITE that EVEN HE admits to massive R*ssian losses
      Is that actually too hard to grasp for you?

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    we're reaching wwII levels of breakout now

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >we're reaching wwII levels of breakout now
      The nazi/commie LARP is perfect to the point of reconstructing ww2 battles

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Hemmed into a narrow area, the 250,000-strong Soviet force inside the pocket was exterminated from all sides by German armored, artillery and machine gun firepower as well as 7,700 tonnes of air-dropped bombs.
        Here's hoping.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Does anyone know of any YouTubers who shill Russia? I need someone to make fun of

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      CovertCabal

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That guy doesn't really shill anyone he just takes the le analytical stance

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      there was some brownoid with history in his channel name. forgot it though, maybe someone else knows.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        historylegends?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      theinfographics or whatever is still putting out videos about a month ago shilling that rus could take NATO. shitty animation and not recommended. like other guy said covert cabal still shills their systems pretty hard.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      HistoryLegends. *Very* thinly-veiled vatnik cheerleader larping as "is of just honest analyze of war, comrade."

      CovertCabal

      CovertCabal is less a shill and more an autist that had been well taken-in and fooled by years of bad/outright fabricated specifications and capabilities of Russian and chinkoid hardware and doctrine. The fricking sock puppet, Binkov I think, now there's a candidate for russoid shill.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >HistoryLegends

        Just looked at his channel, latest video is how uaf failed in kherson and there's a pol on community where most of his audience think the russians will encircle and counter all the ukie troops that advanced

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          On second thought, I might give his shit another sample when Ukrainians take back Kupiansk and Izium. A sheer, absolute fricking vatnik cesspool, complete with thirsty vatnik fans. I can only imagine his comments section to be a fine rainbow coalition of thirdies and assorted tankie delights.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Jordan Peterson

      HistoryLegends. *Very* thinly-veiled vatnik cheerleader larping as "is of just honest analyze of war, comrade."
      [...]
      CovertCabal is less a shill and more an autist that had been well taken-in and fooled by years of bad/outright fabricated specifications and capabilities of Russian and chinkoid hardware and doctrine. The fricking sock puppet, Binkov I think, now there's a candidate for russoid shill.

      >HistoryLegends

      God, what a fricking disappointment, I actually enjoy his non-Ukraine PrepHole content, but the dumbass seems to think that the Russian Army of 2022 is still the Red Army of 1945-1991 and not a horde of cargo cultists wearing its rotting skin. That or he's just milking the Vatnik crowd for views, which is possibly even more despicable.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Jordan Peterson
        That homosexual still makes videos?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          His Ukraine video is basically him ranting for an hour about how the war is the fault of the West because muh Globohomosexual and how Ukraine should just capitulate to the Gulaghomosexual instead.

          Now, I actually agree with a lot of Peterson says most of the time but can we turn off the Culture War shit for like ten fricking seconds please? If the Russians had their way, they would exterminate every last one of us and wouldn't be a culture left to fight over.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Peterson is inherently a neocon talking head so he will have a lot of party line opinions that are downright moronic.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              To be fair. All parties have those among their ranks.

              But yeah he should stick to psychology not geopolitics and war commenting.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >But yeah he should stick to psychology not geopolitics and war commenting.
                Psychology was never anything but a stepping stone for him.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Peterson fell hard

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Really? He fricked up that hard?

              [...]
              Jordan Peterson during his biblical series time was amazing, post drug coma Jordan is just a caricature of his former self

              https://i.imgur.com/t53e8gg.png

              Even the top comments question him.
              Man, I used to look up to him, even have the lobster book, JP was based back in the bible days.
              Before anyone asks yes, my father was pretty absent in my upbringing.

              One frick-up does not invalidate his previous good work. Good deeds do not erase bad deeds, nor do bad deeds erase good deeds. He's flawed like we all are and in this case it showed particularly clearly.

              Don't go to him for geopolitical takes but his anti-wokism crusade remains relevant. The dismantling of the institutions of the West from within needs to be stopped or we're the next R*ssia.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            you're such a fricking Black person dude. Why do I keep running into you here.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            He fricking lost if over all the culture war bullshit. None of that is even relevant when faced with an invading totalitarian empire

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Wasn’t he in a full on covid coma at one point? I can’t imagine you ever completely come back from that, mentally speaking

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                i think he went into coma after his moronic daughter sent him to a russian hospital for his benzo addiction.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >I actually agree with a lot of Peterson says most of the time
              moron.

              Why the hell are people getting their opinions on this war from a washed up psych professor in a questionable mental state?

              Calm down, trannies, remember that he will actually use your pronouns if not compelled by law.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I hate people like him
            >DUDE WEST SHOULD JUST GIVE IT TO RUSSIA WELL BECAUSE YOU KNOW?
            frick these parasites if anything west should nuke russia and chink and get them down on their knees.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              The reasoning for a lot of that was that Russia was a strong country and a potential US ally against China.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Jordan Peterson
            The way he smugly asserts shit while talking about things he very clearly has no fricking clue about makes me so fricking mad
            I wish he'd just go back to being a statistic on drug use

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Really? He fricked up that hard?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Frying your brain with benzos and then going into a medical coma in a dodgy russian drug clinic while your moron daughter feeds you raw meat will destroy anybody, and Peterson was never that smart to begin with, he was just good at affecting a collegiate attitude and being a surrogate dad for fatherless NEETs.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                [...]
                >his moronic daughter sent him to a russian hospital for his benzo addiction.
                This is actually a good point, he probably feels beholden to Russia for helping him.

                I had a coworker send me on a date with a friend of his girlfriend once. I kept shilling for the guy at work even when he fricked everything up horribly.

                I never saw him as a father figure, given that I have a father and a wonderful family, but I liked him for being the closest thing to an intellectual of the past, even if he was overly emotional and I didn't agree with him on everything. He stood up for western civilization and classical values, which I something I could respect, and he did it in the face of overwhelming criticism. He was a breath of fresh air.
                I just don't understand how he can fall for propaganda as blatant as what the degenerate Russian savages produce.

                I guess his recent bullshit explains why he's plastered his walls with Soviet propaganda. He claimed it was to remind him of evil and to oppose authoritarianism, but I guess that was just a lie. I mean, there was no nazi art on his walls.
                So much for his proselytizing Solzhenitsyn. Now he's supporting the spiritual successors of the genocidal regime he so vehemently criticized.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Peterson was never that smart to begin with, he was just good at affecting a collegiate attitude
                wrong; he was a good prof who rebelled against the prevailing collegiate attitude which is "keep your head down and don't annoy the globohomos"

                most of what he says in his chosen battlefield is sound. he just shouldn't ever have commented on military matters

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              https://i.imgur.com/47eS3F5.jpg

              His Ukraine video is basically him ranting for an hour about how the war is the fault of the West because muh Globohomosexual and how Ukraine should just capitulate to the Gulaghomosexual instead.

              Now, I actually agree with a lot of Peterson says most of the time but can we turn off the Culture War shit for like ten fricking seconds please? If the Russians had their way, they would exterminate every last one of us and wouldn't be a culture left to fight over.

              i think he went into coma after his moronic daughter sent him to a russian hospital for his benzo addiction.

              >his moronic daughter sent him to a russian hospital for his benzo addiction.
              This is actually a good point, he probably feels beholden to Russia for helping him.

              I had a coworker send me on a date with a friend of his girlfriend once. I kept shilling for the guy at work even when he fricked everything up horribly.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/0zmjJSj.png

            >Jordan Peterson
            The way he smugly asserts shit while talking about things he very clearly has no fricking clue about makes me so fricking mad
            I wish he'd just go back to being a statistic on drug use

            Jordan Peterson during his biblical series time was amazing, post drug coma Jordan is just a caricature of his former self

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Peterson is a pretty decent social psychologist. Just like Chomsky is regarded as one of the best linguists alive.

              But why the frick do these intellectuals think that they can have a robust opinion on geopolitics is beyond me. Chomsky has outright genocide denial point of views.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Same with Peter Zeihan. He keeps trying to pretend to be a military strategist on his Twitter account now.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Zeihan

                Top kek - he literally thought as late as May that Russia would be able to march to the Polish border. A moron like me worked out in less than a week into the war once my depression cleared up that 200k troops wasn't going to take jack shit when Sarajevo held out while completely surrounded for several years.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >I actually agree with a lot of Peterson says most of the time
            moron.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Even the top comments question him.
            Man, I used to look up to him, even have the lobster book, JP was based back in the bible days.
            Before anyone asks yes, my father was pretty absent in my upbringing.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Why the hell are people getting their opinions on this war from a washed up psych professor in a questionable mental state?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              celebrity mentality. for the same reason celebrities also get a lot of likes on tweets despite saying nothing out of the ordinary

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Every
            single
            fricking
            pro-russian westerner
            fricking frames a conflict that is at it's core a conflict of one nation, with it's own cultural identity, rejecting the historical, literal and secondarily cultural imperialism of it's bully of a neighbor, who is essentially telling them that they have no right to exist and do not exist
            as
            "This is the culture war's next step, and western civilization and the white race is at stake if we don't oppose the globalists!!!11!!"

            Fricking shut the frick up
            And the people who believe this shit should be labeled as having Low-IQ
            This is just the next thing in a long line of things where "western civilization and the white race is at stake and being destroyed by the globalists;" It's all a fricking grift.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Ukraine should just capitulate to the Gulaghomosexual instead
            It's a moronic video full of non-sequiturs and lots of idiocy but he doesn't actually say or imply that. He apparently unironically bought into the MUH NOOOOKS narrative (including the tsunami nook, kek) and argues that Pootin is some kind of Godemperor who could make his nation commit thermonuclear suicide if he wanted to, completely ignoring the reality of R*ssian power structures and nuclear C&C.

            He's simply talking out of his ass because he got too comfy more or less successfully speaking on things he has no expertise on.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Peterson says that NATO and Ukraine should be “having dialogue with Putin” instead of saber-rattling because he MIGHT use nukes, which as far as I’m concerned is a de facto demand for Ukrainian capitulation.

              Any Russian threats of using nuclear weapons should be met with threats from NATO of equally brutal nuclear retaliation in kind. The only thing these people understand or respect is force.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The war is the fault of the West only in the context that they refused to properly protect Ukraine from Russian aggression and overall bullshittery.
            NATO gave ample space for Russia to misbehave instead of properly dealing with them in order to appease them and Russia, like the sociopathic country that it is decided to exploit it to its maximum extent.

            Fortunately, it seems that NATO is finally done with their bullshit, even Macron finally realized its useless to try to talk to Putin like civilized humans do.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I agree with the basic premise of the video In that the west is facing a choice where it must pick it's own madness. That' it's confronted with the fact that it can't have it's cake and eat it too.
            I will also agree that this isn't one of his best video lectures.

            [...]
            [...]
            [...]
            One frick-up does not invalidate his previous good work. Good deeds do not erase bad deeds, nor do bad deeds erase good deeds. He's flawed like we all are and in this case it showed particularly clearly.

            Don't go to him for geopolitical takes but his anti-wokism crusade remains relevant. The dismantling of the institutions of the West from within needs to be stopped or we're the next R*ssia.

            I agree. Ukraine is not JP's fight. His is a much higher one.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        extracrispi, shut the frick up

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Silence Reznov

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >the dumbass seems to think that the Russian Army of 2022 is still the Red Army of 1945-1991
        >or he's just milking the Vatnik crowd for views
        Probably a little bit of both, really. I gave him a shot for Ukraine content as I'd subscribed to him way back, but his commitment to the notion of Russian competence somehow still existing wound up tainting his objectivity, especially once things developed well enough for hindsight to really abuse a lot of his past takes on things.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Basically every alt righter

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Military Summary is a propaganda shill from Russia who's literally paid to do it.
      Military and Foreign Affairs Network is some LOLbertarian from America who tries to come off as impartial but plainly wants Russia to score a crushing victory to spite his domestic enemies.
      And if you like laughing at literally who completely clueless amateurs who do it for free, the funniest one I found is Weeb Union.
      Now get this. He's a second generation shitskin immigrant, islamic commie, squatting in Denmark, simping for Russia. And he looks literally like the swarthoid on this pic.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >russia planning counter-counteroffensive

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        does russia really have orthodox larpers on their side? Have they not heard of the state and history of the russian orthodox church?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Don't lump Orthos in with those people. The Orthodox world is already pissed at the Russian Church for supporting the war.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          My GF is polish so I went to a pro-ukraine rally when this shitshow began.
          The most level headed but also heartwarming person was the OrthoPriest. Great man.
          Also my ex is Ukrainian and she warned me back then that the Russian Church SPECIFICALLY was a KGB and now FSB branch.
          In fact, putting all the pieces together, the Patriarch of Constantinople blessed the separation of the Ukie church from the Russian one some time ago. The shitheads got mad.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        image ain't even a strawman

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >how many levels of being a subverted failure are you on
          >like 5 or maybe 6 my dude
          >you are a little baby

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      scott ritter

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >asking KKK to embrace the Black person loving culture
        this guy is delusional

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Isn't Scott Diddler the chomosexual who was dumb enough to walk in to same honeypot twice?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          seems like it kek, i hadn't heard that

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >After this information was made public in early 2003, Ritter said that the timing of the leak was politically motivated in order to silence his opposition to the Bush administration's push toward war with Iraq.
            Uh ya man, you're still a kid diddler.... Like, why would he say that as if it excuses anything? "O ya well you weren't actually supposed to know that so it doesn't matter"

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Arch Vatnikhammer just released a video chuckling and doomposting about EU freezing and starving and how it was all a genius master plan by based Putin.
      Sargoy and his homosexuals made three videos basically saying Two Weeks at the start of the war, then pretended it didn't happen until recently when they started crying about gas prices and how UK is a small cottage island who dindu nuffins and should not get involved.
      Throw a stone into the whole pack of Gamergate alt-right Black folk and you'll hit a vatnik.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What went wrong with the alt right dudes Jesus Christ. I thought they supported individual freedom? Why are they sucking Russian wiener? I’d be disappointed if I didn’t have better things to do than be mad about morons I used to watch on YouTube when I was 13

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          because they are literally "i oppose the current thing" meme

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          None of these homosexuals get more than 200k views per video on YT and more than 10k on other le based free speech EVER GROWING YA HEAR ME platforms. That's pocket change ad revenue assuming they get any, nor they have any other jobs or shit like patreon because they got kicked out even back when I used to watch them. Sargoy even has a studio and employees. Who do you think pays their bills?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Very very few /misc/tards have independent thoughts or original opinions on anything. Useful idiots and contrarians the lot of them.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >UK is a small cottage island who dindu nuffins and should not get involved.

        The invasion happened because the US and UK told Ukraine in 1994 "Get rid of the nukes, we'll protect you." This crisis 100% involves the US and UK by any metric.

        I'm nationalist right but there's a reason that the /uhg/ and /chug/ war's been happening on /misc/, which as far as I can see is the first time there's been a serious narrative war there since the Lolbertarian vs Nazi wars of 2013. A majority of people in the nationalist right in the West are evidently just anti-current thing and have little plans about how to actually make themselves appealing to the population. East European nationalists by contrast were significantly more anti-Russia, because they didn't want to have their cultures and languages obliterated by le savior of the white race.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >The invasion happened because the US and UK told Ukraine in 1994 "Get rid of the nukes, we'll protect you." This crisis 100% involves the US and UK by any metric.
          NTA and not disagreeing but I feel it should be mentioned that Russia also was on that agreement to protect Ukraine.
          The involvement that those "nationalist right" people refer to though regularly is that the the moronic culture war bullshit that is more existent in US/UK politics (barely so on the fringe of right and left, I'd fricking argue) is a bigger factor in a conflict that has historical context going back a hundred years at least, if not more.
          Basically I'm saying that the relating of this conflict to the moronic culture war and savior of the white race shit is a lot of pundit like sargoy attempting to partly coop something in order to grift more from moronic people.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Even if they kept the nukes they wouldn't have had the budget to maintain them.
          Even if they HAD the budget, they wouldn't have the capability to launch them because the control centers are in Russia.
          You're a fricking moron and should stop talking about things you don't understand.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            ... Yes? There was an actual debate in Ukraine at the time and the decision was solidified when the US and UK brokered the Budapest Memorandum, a decision that almost every Ukrainian thinks was a mistake - source: talked to them when I was over there.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          > East European nationalists by contrast were significantly more anti-Russia, because they didn't want to have their cultures and languages obliterated by le savior of the white race.
          Non-rus slav here. I'd be careful with this claim. A lot of our right and far-right saw Putin as a father figure that needs to be copy-pasted locally, along with the whole state apparatus. Same goes for leftists and ironically enough lolberts. Coincidentally every time audit happens to them for being homosexuals, it turns out they've been getting a lot of money from businessmen with connections to other businessmen further east.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Coincidentally every time audit happens to them for being homosexuals, it turns out they've been getting a lot of money from businessmen with connections to other businessmen further east.
            Funny that.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Same shit in Romania. Eastern Europe, with the exception of some moronic boomers, seems to generally be more right leaning as sort of a slingshot reaction to its communist past, that explains why it gives some westerners the impression that our right is somehow less contrarian than theirs.
            But the more extremist morons are still heavily tied to Moscow. They think young people having dyed hair and riding electric scooters will obviously lead to societal collapse, so they think the solution is to yet again live under a repressive regime lead by borderline morons.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        i HATE Arch homosexualhammer but hes not pro-russian, hes been very critical of russian strategies from day one

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      if you speak Taco language, check Canal Conocimiento Militar, biggest russian shill around and he is coping HARD

      >jajajaja Kherson offensive failed according to russian cope maps
      >jajajaja the Ukranians might have advanced a lot in Kharkiv but its only a matter of time before glorious rasha attacks their supply lines
      >jajajaja yes Ukraine advanced in Kharkiv but its ok because that front was defended by third grade troops and theres nothing of value there so it doesnt count
      >jajajaja ok maybe russia didnt hit the supply lines, but they will surely fall before the russian counter attack THAT IS TOTALLY HAPPENING AMIGOS

      and now, the biggest cope atleast in spanish pro-russian circles, is that winter will somehow save russia, either because they will make a great winter offensive or europe will freeze without russian gas or something

      they have been reduced to begging for favorable weather, no different from natives performing a rain dance

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Better start sacrificing babies and ripping out hearts to Tlaloc and Mixcoatl if the Mexicans want any effect on Russian weather, lmao.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Binkovs Battlefield doesn't seem like a shill, but his videos have a very strong "The gloves have yet to come off!" tilt when talking about Russia.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >his videos have a very strong "The gloves have yet to come off!" tilt when talking about Russia
        most generous take I can give him is that his entire schtick was reading Wikipedia TOEs and matching them up against each other, so he probably unironically buys into the "3,000 tanks ready, and 10,000 more well on the way" bullshit

        that or he's a closet vatnig

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Every day until Strelkov kills himself

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    If the Ukies win, I will print out and cum on any picture of RU colaborators getting killed and/or tortured. I will then mail those pictures to their families.
    Screencap this.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Holy trips.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >those digits
      i do not habeeb it

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >777
      At long last, the kek is coming for monke

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Done 🙂

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      DIGITSAMA, I KNEEL

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      based

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Based coomer

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Well. Get the phonebook out I guess, lmao.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >globohomosexual ready to deploy Coomberg
      Vatniks are FRICKED.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      TRIP-GODS are watching
      You better deliver anon

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Disgusted but intrigued

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Trips of Artillery
      A blessed post.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Based vengeance wanker

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Trips of Truth
      I hope you've got plenty of lithium in your diet, anon

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      bruh

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Include pregnant Anne Frank in the screencap

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Put me in the screencap.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Numbers never lie

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      do it

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      dangerously based

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >777
      This post was supplied by NATO

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        on a pallet

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Checked, keked and Based.
      I was here when the coomer Terrorist made his promise to terrorize an entire country by cumming on the pics of dead soldiers.

      What do we call you : The Coomer of Kyiv?
      The memes are starting to break into the real world.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Based and cum-pilled

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >those digits
      you must now
      no backing out

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Holy fricking jackpot

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      t. most moderate man in Poland

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This is absolutely disgusting, anon.

      Godspeed and luck on completing this noble task.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      And so it is.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Vatniks dying, and traitors have their legacies literally stained forever.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Witnessed.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They say that we die twice. Once, when you stop breathing. And then again when the Coomer of /k/yiv cums on your photo and sends it to your grieving family.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Based deranged coomer. I'll hold you onto that promise.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      And a guy said he would eat his own shit if Ukraine was still standing at the end of February or something. It never happened. Who cares.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Eating shit is disgusting. Cumming all over the place is pleasant.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      BASED
      We will be watching your career with great interest. The /k/ouncil will be watching.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    But how many vatniks dead?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not enough

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Never enough

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Reinforcements are coming

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      why is that moron wearing a bulletproof vest if he is in r*ssia and stuff?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Gopniks could be everywhere.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        He wanna be taktikool

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This particular guy wasn't wonded in combat. He was born that way. He's a Ukrainian member of old Yanukovich party who served in their Rada before maidan, then betrayed Ukraine in favor of Russia. He's assumed to be a rich guy, so him being dressed in uniform and riding in an old-school wheelbarrow instead of a wheelchair is pure cosplay.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Truly, the modern-day Ephialtes.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Rooks arike you haff the man you used to be!

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like Oskil was taken

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Oskil is the name of the river.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Oskil is the name of the river.
        There's also a small pond with the same name closeby.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >pic on the right is literally a thumbs down
    Poetic

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Are there any recent developments?
    Can the Ukrainians make any more flash gains? What about Izyum?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Some Ruskie collaborators were asking for reinforcements on telegram saying Izium would be defenseless with troops being redeployed north.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        If they had any brains or initiative they'd be attempting a withdraw in good order out of Izyum right fricking now in order to preserve some fricking equipment from just being given to the UA.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >If they had any brains or initiative they'd be attempting a withdraw in good order out of Izyum right fricking now in order to preserve some fricking equipment from just being given to the UA.
          Yeah, Izyum is gone at this point. I mean, not literally yet of course, but you can't hold something like that with primary supply cut and remaining lines under direct enemy fire control with roads/rivers zeroed in. It might well seem to them like "if only they just get some reinforcements!!" they can hold it but that isn't how logistics works it merely delays the inevitable while wasting more resources.

          Fortunately vatniks are highly centralized and what little central brains they possessed have been getting rapidly blown out.

          shit apparently some high command in Izyum already fled with the wounded

          >"bravely initiated a tactical withdrawal"

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        shit apparently some high command in Izyum already fled with the wounded

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >If they had any brains or initiative they'd be attempting a withdraw in good order out of Izyum right fricking now in order to preserve some fricking equipment from just being given to the UA.
          Yeah, Izyum is gone at this point. I mean, not literally yet of course, but you can't hold something like that with primary supply cut and remaining lines under direct enemy fire control with roads/rivers zeroed in. It might well seem to them like "if only they just get some reinforcements!!" they can hold it but that isn't how logistics works it merely delays the inevitable while wasting more resources.

          Fortunately vatniks are highly centralized and what little central brains they possessed have been getting rapidly blown out.

          [...]
          >"bravely initiated a tactical withdrawal"

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >he took the difficult personal decision (I would say an act of strongest will) to evacuate Izyum
            lmao
            lol even

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              it's sarcasm, Russians are of the opinion that the military is bungling it up, but incorrectly believe it's lower commanders being cowardly/treasonous and refusing hard positions
              in reality, even if they did not flee, no reinforcements are coming - Russia's military is being crushed

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            ?t=140

            Even if it's obvious I hope to see someone do a riff to this featuring russ "commanders".

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >CO of the 2nd Guards Motor Rifle
            >The Taman Guard
            >The literal honor guard of the Kremlin since 1953
            >legs it at the first sign of trouble

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              already got BTFO'd in the Chernihiv sector

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Who was it again…I’m thinking it was the 2nd Tank Guards commander who fled with the wounded. Apparently leaving up to 22K worth of troops and equipment behind to lead from further in the rear.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    if true, how are they able to do this with light and motorized infantry? was all the shilling and striking around kherson just a ploy?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      TEMPO TEMPO TEMPO

      The russians are even less well equipped, and their heavy units are stuck in contact, or ambushed moving trying to put out fires. Light Cav tactics my man

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >light and motorized infantry?
      We’ve seen T-72 tanks as well as M270 MLRS and PzH 2000 as part of this assault. These aren’t merely humvees giving the Russians issues. The first breakthrough was accomplished by 17 T-72 tanks smashing through the OMON units holding the line.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Since Ukraine has exactly one bataillon of PzH 2000, do they use them in a single area or are some of them deployed in Kherson?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I wish I knew. I too thought they were all down south but then a couple of days ago that webm pops up of a column of IFVs and two PzH 2000 in Kharkiv.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Confidential. They are most likely used in 2 pairs of 6 or 6 pairs of 2.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            They have 18 in total because they have 18 SPH in a bataillon. They also have 18 Krab and 18 CAESAR for that reason.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Glorified riot cops vs seventeen MBTs
        What the frick are the Russians thinking

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >was all the shilling and striking around kherson just a ploy?
      No, UA is absolutely serious about both, Kherson is very important. They have multiple theaters of command though and are capable of multitasking and trying a few things at once at this point, so they're doing a one-two punch. Kherson did attract more vatnik forces, so western command saw an opening and went for it, and then it went really well, so now they're focused on exploiting that and establishing a solid new front with the river while cutting a critical depot.

      But iof instead Russia had left another area weak they'd have done that instead. And by the same token if Russia now rushed back up to try to defend/take back this, well UA is ready to move aggressively on any further voids that appear. Russia has suffered enough logistical and command damage that they have become over extended without any defensive depth, so they can rob peter to pay paul but that doesn't help their overall strategic situation and once their initial positions collapse they are liable to get routed which is super wasteful.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Kherson did attract more vatnik forces, so western command saw an opening and went for it, and then it went really well, so now they're focused on exploiting that and establishing a solid new front with the river while cutting a critical depot.

        so reinforcing success instead of the typical military thinking of forcing a push where they want it?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Right, probably one of the biggest things NATO gave Ukraine since 2014 was training and thinking on how to be more decentralized and allow local commands straight down to troop level to have more initiative with central helping to coordinate and determine overall strats, but not trying to micromanage or insist dynamic unpredictable stuff goes their way. I mean obviously all the advanced weapons and such are super helpful too at this stage, but it's that difference in command structure and thinking that helped the UA punch way above their weight early on when all they were getting was some TOWs/Javs, and is radically different then the old soviet organization they used to be on and Russia still is.

          So basically don't extrapolate retroactively too much, UA was doing it right by having plans for no matter what happened. They kept hitting logistics and poking here and there, helped of course by very advanced intel. They were looking for "something" not a single specific thing, so Russia could have reacted differently but still gotten fricked merely somewhere else because they'd been steadily getting more and more stretched. Those pokes weren't "feints" if vatniks had showed the right openings or collapsed at Kherson they'd have been perfectly happy with it. But they were trying to create a situation where inevitably SOMETHING had to give because Russia could just no longer be everywhere at once. And then they were ready to move, and not cautiously and hesitantly but move move move for tactical high value objectives.

          It's still ballsy of course and stuff can still go wrong, full credit to the forces at the tip of the spear. But a lot went on leading up to this moment as well (which no doubt makes it sweeter for them).

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      MuttBlack person shills and fed mods already changed are already back to coping about successful evacuation mission after exposing how weak Donetsk and Russia are and how strong American terrorist have been for one day of getting sorrounded

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I can't even tell what you are with a post as schizoid as this.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >was all the shilling and striking around kherson just a ploy?
      No, they are pushing into Kherson as well. However, because this was widely anticipated by everyone including Russia for the last month or more, Russia moved a shitload of troops and equipment south to defend Kherson, leaving other fronts ripe for collapse.

      Ukraine is, quite wisely, taking these opportunities while they can. Unfortunately, that overshadows Kherson, and it's going to make things much harder on the troops fighting to take back Kherson.

      Eventually Russia is going to have to mooooobilize if they don't want to just give up (or go nuclear), and at that point things will get REALLY HARD.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        problem with mobilization is that the russian train system will effectively force all mobilized troops to pass through moscow. This happened in 1917. Problem with nukes aside from pissing off literally everybody is that not only does it invite NATO escalation but lots of powerful Muscovites have close family in Western cities. They may not be particularly interested in the prospect of being nuked, nor of nuking their own progeny.
        I actually think Putin just needs to keep the war going without actually doing any fighting. He has total control of the state and can keep it on a wartime footing even if there is no actual war going on. Who will challenge him, so long as Muscovites get their three meals a day and internet?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Eventually Russia is going to have to mooooobilize if they don't want to just give up (or go nuclear), and at that point things will get REALLY HARD.
        They can't supply the troops they have right now anon. They're in a vastly worse supply and kit position then they were at the start too. This isn't pre-WW1, you can't just throw mass meat at a war and expect it to make the slightest difference vs mechanized infantry with HMGs and artillery, let alone hyper advanced satellite and drone surveillance support supplied by the most developed nations on the planet.

        And they can "give up" without publicly "giving up" like other anon said. They can claim the special operation is ongoing but just, not have anything more than forces at the border. Turn it back into a frozen conflict. Would be a lot easier then people think, like, suddenly they don't even have to cover up death totals anymore because there wouldn't be any! Surely a sign of how much they're winning! If you look at how insulated from this average Russians are right now it's entirely believable, nobody can gainsay the Kremlin's story. Giving up while claiming they didn't would be a very straight forward move, far more then mobilization or nooks.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >And they can "give up" without publicly "giving up" like other anon said. They can claim the special operation is ongoing but just, not have anything more than forces at the border. Turn it back into a frozen conflict.
          Cannot occur now because Ukraine does not want a frozen conflict. The separatists and Russia alike are now depleted, making rolling back to past borders or freezing current borders untenable, it only works if you have force to back it up.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Cannot occur now because Ukraine does not want a frozen conflict. The separatists and Russia alike are now depleted, making rolling back to past borders or freezing current borders untenable, it only works if you have force to back it up.
            Wrong. How can you be this fricking ignorant here and talk when you've apparently never heard of "Korea" before!? You know that we're literally still legally at war there? No peace treaty was ever signed. It's a frozen conflict, one of the most dangerous hardest borders on the planet but zero of each other's forces on the other side of it, both stick to their own while waving swords once in a while. Russia could easily use that model for this, and just fricking lie. They already are lying, constantly!
            >The separatists and Russia alike are now depleted
            They can literally just claim they have separatists anyway! Just make it all up like they are right fricking now!
            >it only works if you have force to back it up.
            lol? We can literally see in real time that's not the case anon. Russians accept being lied to either because they actually believe it or the culture of cynicism/nihilism the government has worked to cultivate. Kremlin can claim there is a war when there is no war and it'd literally be easier, an improvement.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Russia cannot choose to stop Ukraine from marching. The entente in North Korea is because North Korea has enough manpower and external support that South Korea does not WANT to invade North Korea.
              If North Korea depleted its military or alienated China, South Korea would likely invade North Korea.
              UKraine DOES want to retake its land, and Russia has no say in whether they do this.
              Attempting to "freeze" the conflict, as they did in 2014, would have only worked while Russia's military was a deterrent force.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Russia cannot choose to stop Ukraine from marching
                Of course they can. Ukraine INVADING Russia is very different from completely booting them from their own borders. Russia's inability to push far beyond its own borders is very different from internal defense on their own territory. And this is a case where the Nuke Card actually for real comes into play. Using nukes against someone else for aggression is an ultimate bad. But using nukes on your own territory against a literal land invading army? That's the core legitimate argument for them. Ukraine isn't going to do that.
                >UKraine DOES want to retake its land, and Russia has no say in whether they do this.
                Yeah? Which is fine. And doesn't affect their ability to have a frozen conflict at all wtf?
                >Attempting to "freeze" the conflict, as they did in 2014, would have only worked while Russia's military was a deterrent force.
                It's absolutely a deterrent force for the invasion of Russia still. Just like North and South Korea are 100% independent sovereign countries. Russia can retreat right back to their own borders, then just claim the battle is ongoing anyway and simply never declare it over, even though nothing is happening. That's the literal definition of a FROZEN conflict anon. If anything was happening it wouldn't be "frozen" now would it?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Ukraine INVADING Russia is very different from completely booting them from their own borders.
                >Russia can retreat right back to their own borders
                Completely booting Russia out from Ukraine's borders is a total failure for Putin and will not go over well with the Russian people. Russians would tolerate a break-even and "denazification" stalemate silently, but if Russia was pushed out of Ukraine entirely (or past Belgorod for funzies) then it would be a new level of humiliation.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Completely booting Russia out from Ukraine's borders is a total failure for Putin and will not go over well with the Russian people
                Why not? What are they going to do about it vs their inaction already? Particularly if he simply makes the official line that Russia hasn't been booted at all but won and has now left it to local elements. And it's 15 years in prison if you say otherwise. And unlike right now, there is literally no one being killed anymore, no more money being pissed away there.

                What's anyone going to do anon? You think THAT will be the time the russian population suddenly gains introspection? Or you think there will be a military coup, when the military was just further hollowed out and the security services made stronger? Oligarchs are under his boot already in favor of security services.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >If North Korea depleted its military or alienated China, South Korea would likely invade North Korea.
                Doubtful. South Korea doesn't want the expense and trouble of assimilating millions of mindfricked Norks.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It might be more accurate to imagine South Korea's forces being depleted at the same time as the U.S. is distracted/isolationist. In that situation, North Korea would almost certainly invade South. Meanwhile, even if the U.S. was not a factor, if South Korea's military was still robust, the North would tolerate a stalemate.
                Russia has no more men and no backup, out of Ukraine they go (whether they want to or not).

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >expense and trouble
                you kidding? it would skyrocket the Seoul economy

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                No, it really wouldn't. It would take a decade or more before the Norks were anything but a drain. Look at the reunification of Germany; the Osties didn't understand how to function in a capitalist economy, their skills were decades behind, and they were starting from financial zero. West Germany had to commit to feeding, educating, and training them before they could be economically beneficial.

                Even today the eastern parts of Germany are relatively economically depressed.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >It would take a decade or more
                but it would be a shot in the arm, eventually

                it's like making the developing-nation-middle-income transition all over again. all those Norks to get consooming

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >They can't supply the troops they have right now anon.
          Good point. but as

          >And they can "give up" without publicly "giving up" like other anon said. They can claim the special operation is ongoing but just, not have anything more than forces at the border. Turn it back into a frozen conflict.
          Cannot occur now because Ukraine does not want a frozen conflict. The separatists and Russia alike are now depleted, making rolling back to past borders or freezing current borders untenable, it only works if you have force to back it up.

          notes,
          >Turn it back into a frozen conflict.
          the Ukrainians won't allow this and neither will anyone else. Ukraine has brought the Russian military to its knees; there's no "ok we'll let you rest for a decade while you prepare for invading us again."

          >If you look at how insulated from this average Russians are right now
          Ukraine has noted this, and has written that it intends to bring the war to the average Russian in 2023. See the paragraph below the image of the ATACMS in this article:
          https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-ato/3566162-ak-zabezpeciti-voennu-kampaniu-u-2023-roci-ukrainskij-poglad.html

          I personally found the translation of this that I read to be chilling. Russia either gives up or it's going to get forcibly escalated by Ukraine next year.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >the Ukrainians won't allow this and neither will anyone else. Ukraine has brought the Russian military to its knees;
            see

            >Russia cannot choose to stop Ukraine from marching
            Of course they can. Ukraine INVADING Russia is very different from completely booting them from their own borders. Russia's inability to push far beyond its own borders is very different from internal defense on their own territory. And this is a case where the Nuke Card actually for real comes into play. Using nukes against someone else for aggression is an ultimate bad. But using nukes on your own territory against a literal land invading army? That's the core legitimate argument for them. Ukraine isn't going to do that.
            >UKraine DOES want to retake its land, and Russia has no say in whether they do this.
            Yeah? Which is fine. And doesn't affect their ability to have a frozen conflict at all wtf?
            >Attempting to "freeze" the conflict, as they did in 2014, would have only worked while Russia's military was a deterrent force.
            It's absolutely a deterrent force for the invasion of Russia still. Just like North and South Korea are 100% independent sovereign countries. Russia can retreat right back to their own borders, then just claim the battle is ongoing anyway and simply never declare it over, even though nothing is happening. That's the literal definition of a FROZEN conflict anon. If anything was happening it wouldn't be "frozen" now would it?

            . Neither Ukraine nor anybody else has the combination of capability and will to stop it from being a frozen conflict. A lot of you clearly have not internalized what that actually means despite me giving an example. A frozen conflict is literally just two countries officially in a continuing state of hostility and faceoffs, with maybe occasional pot shots at each other, while nothing happens. Both stay to their own borders. But they aren't at peace either, the borders are rock hard, mined, walled, covered in emplacements etc. That's it. Russia of course could do this, merely by leaving Ukraine entirely and consolidating in their own country. UA's ability to make headway in their own country isn't the same as the ability to counter-invade another.

            UA might want to counter-invade even, but there the US and others really would say "hey hold up, don't pull a Hitler". Russia has land to give up temporarily, Ukraine has been seriously economically hurt. In fact
            >ok we'll let you rest for a decade while you prepare for invading us again
            You've got this backwards anon: it's Russia that is now going to be more hurt by the passage of time, not Ukraine. It's Ukraine who will get stronger, faster, given the chance. They'll have time to fully integrate with Europe and NATO, to fully update their military, to restock, to rebuild their industrial base faster and better. They're far more industrious, are now fully united, working hard on corruption. If Russia went back to their own borders and did a frozen conflict tomorrow, in ten years I wouldn't be surprised if Ukraine literally has a bigger economy and is utterly unassailable.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Both stay to their own borders.
              Average Russians view Crimea and Donbas as "their own borders" and view the continued existence of Ukraine/Belarus with skepticism. Ukraine is going to invade Crimea by mid 2023. That is not a "frozen conflict" in the minds of Russians, because Ukraine will not let it be one.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Average Russians view Crimea and Donbas as "their own borders" and view the continued existence of Ukraine/Belarus with skepticism. Ukraine is going to invade Crimea by mid 2023. That is not a "frozen conflict" in the minds of Russians
                Russian minds "can be changed" by state decree. If the Kremlin declares it then it is so. I don't see anything significant at this point domestically that threatens them. The population has been cultured to "nothing really matters everything is shit" anyway.

                CONTEXT anon: you're claiming that using nuclear fricking weapons is LESS risky then declaring victory and leaving while claiming the battle continues, with only internal dissent to suppress? Get fricking real. Monke isn't facing any particular threat from the masses unless maybe he actually tries to mobilize them. Or invites nuclear retaliation. If he goes for frozen conflict instead life will literally get better for the average Russian.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >you're claiming that using nuclear fricking weapons is LESS risky
                I didn't see anyplace where he claimed that. He's pointing out, correctly, that the Ukrainians aren't going to tolerate leaving things frozen after having lost 21% of their territory. They did that for eight years after losing 7% in 2014 and look where that got them.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >I didn't see anyplace where he claimed that.
                Follow the thread back up to the beginning anon and

                >was all the shilling and striking around kherson just a ploy?
                No, they are pushing into Kherson as well. However, because this was widely anticipated by everyone including Russia for the last month or more, Russia moved a shitload of troops and equipment south to defend Kherson, leaving other fronts ripe for collapse.

                Ukraine is, quite wisely, taking these opportunities while they can. Unfortunately, that overshadows Kherson, and it's going to make things much harder on the troops fighting to take back Kherson.

                Eventually Russia is going to have to mooooobilize if they don't want to just give up (or go nuclear), and at that point things will get REALLY HARD.

                . What I was responding too was
                >Eventually Russia is going to have to mooooobilize if they don't want to just give up (or go nuclear)
                Mobilization or nuclear are absolutely not the only options here, by any means. And both are vastly riskier then merely freezing it combined with more propaganda.

                >He's pointing out, correctly, that the Ukrainians aren't going to tolerate leaving things frozen after having lost 21% of their territory.
                They don't have a choice. They can't stage an effective invasion and conquest of Russia and force a total surrender that removes the current Kremlin regime alone, and the West isn't going to support that either. If Russia wants to negotiate a peace legitimately in exchange for reparations or something maybe Ukraine would consider it, but otherwise they'll have to be satisfied with gaining 100% of Ukraine (including Crimea) back and then rebuilding and buffing up to make it impossible to ever pull this shit again.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Neither Ukraine nor anybody else has the combination of capability and will to stop it from being a frozen conflict.
              That's the dumbest thing I've seen written. What stops Ukraine from just continuing to shell occupied territory? If Russia freezes, Ukraine can keep manufacturing shells and keep on bombing. Thus, the conflict won't be "frozen" and eventually Russia will be forced to unfreeze as well.

              The reason the Norks and Worst Koreans aren't constantly shooting it out is because both sides AGREED to stop. There isn't a formal written treaty, but neither side wants to continue. If EITHER ONE said "frick it, I'm not putting up with this any more", the conflict would go hot again.

              >If Russia went back to their own borders and did a frozen conflict tomorrow, in ten years I wouldn't be surprised if Ukraine literally has a bigger economy and is utterly unassailable.
              Russia can go back to its USSR-tier command economy, and just demand that everyone churn out artillery shells. They have oil, gas, population, and territory. Sure, they won't have iPhones or Chryslers, but they can churn out steel and explosives all that they want.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >That's the dumbest thing I've seen written
                No, you're just inventing some make believe definition of frozen conflict to knock down anon.
                >The reason the Norks and Worst Koreans aren't constantly shooting it out is because both sides AGREED to stop. There isn't a formal written treaty, but neither side wants to continue. If EITHER ONE said "frick it, I'm not putting up with this any more", the conflict would go hot again.
                DUH? That's why it's still a CONFLICT, just FROZEN. What the frick? And you think Ukraine wouldn't "agree" to halt at Russia's borders but rather try to counter-invade?
                >Russia can go back to its USSR-tier command economy, and just demand that everyone churn out artillery shells. They have oil, gas, population, and territory. Sure, they won't have iPhones or Chryslers, but they can churn out steel and explosives all that they want.
                Which would mean jack fricking shit as we've literally seen vs an actual fully modernized military fighting a defensive war. Hell in 10 years Ukraine could literally be a NATO and EU member state if things went well. It's not about "iPhones or Chryslers" it's about "high performance aircraft" and "high precision ranged weapons" etc. And Ukraine can invest in serious emplacements too, which absolutely can work very well if they can't be bypassed or have support cut off.

                Also, Russia's oil, gas, and population are all going to be worth a lot less in 10 years. Their demographics are utterly fricked. They themselves with this conflict have wrecked their biggest gas customer, and it's very non-trivial to redirect gas elsewhere. They could easily spend a decade just trying to match western pipeline capacity to go to China instead. Oil is somewhat more insulated, but the switch to BEVs is starting to accelerate hard at this point. Time is not on their side on that one either.

                Ukraine would be perfectly well served by booting Russia back to their own borders and freezing it even if officially they stay at war.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Here's the quote:

            Only in this case it is possible to discuss the influence on the real center of gravity of the Russian Federation in this war. It lies in its "remote" - in the understanding of most Russians - character. Thanks to this distance, the citizens of the Russian Federation do not so painfully perceive losses, failures, and most importantly - the cost of this war in all its meanings. A convincing example of the correctness of this approach in the current year is the successful efforts of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to physically transfer hostilities to the temporarily occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. We are talking about a series of successful missile strikes on the enemy's Crimean air bases, first of all, on the Saka airfield [4] . The task of the Armed Forces of Ukraine for 2023 is to make these feelings sharper, more natural and quite tangible for the Russians and in other occupied territories, despite the significant distance from the goals.

            Frick me.
            Imagine explaining to someone back in February 24 that after 6 months of war the ukies plan is basically "take back Crimea and make them feel the pain"

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    How is /chug/ taking this? I could go and look myself but I don't wanna.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I looked earlier, and they're either in pure denial phase or writing fan fiction like pic related

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Doesn't sound like fan fiction, just presenting the Russian situation.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >"Ukrainian messages talk of panic and heavy losses at Kupyansk and a belief they've fallen into an ambush on a strategic scale. Demanding to know where aviation and artillery support is"
          how is that not fan fiction again? they're plugged into Ukrainian comms, I take it? if so, then surely they can provide any evidence to back up these radical statements that seem to contradict literally everything else we're seeing coming out of that region

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It's just taking the Russian problems and pretending the Ukrainians face them.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Ohh I misinterpreted your first reply, yes I agree with you, it seems like they just swapped "Ukraine" and "Russia" in whatever battlefield assessment they read on TG

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >this level of denial

        jesus christ this must be trolling
        how deep has the monke penetrated this dude

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine the type of person who types all that complete bullshit

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        May the Queen curse him from beyond the grave.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        There is no paniK

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      brown /chug/gers getting clowned on by /uhg/

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      There is no panic. Let your enemy think they are winning and then crush them.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      they're holding up well

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Hey little guy, how are you doing?
        >picrel
        >Yea

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They don't even bantz any more. They just keep shrieking about troons any time anyone posts. I'd say over half the posts are trolling them. I gave up, it was just too sad trombone noises to bother any more.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Any serious update from kupjansk in the last 2 hours?

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What are the implications if Kupyansk and Izyum fall?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      1st Guards Tank Army is fricked. That's about 22k men fricking gone with their equipment. That would be a huge loss for the Russians in men and equipment they can't afford to replace.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If Izium falls that's maybe 10-20% of Russian men and equipment in Ukraine.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        they could just withdraw in relatively good order like they did from Kiev

        some equipment losses but the men can be redeployed elsewhere

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Can't now, Ukrainians have direct fire on their escape routes. They'll have to abandon most of their heavy equipment.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >They'll have to abandon most of their heavy equipment.

            you mistake ukronazis for russys

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Depends how they fall
            If Russians manage to evac 80-90% of their soldiers then it's a small tactical victory for Ukraine and perhaps the beginning of a strategic victory
            If Ukies manage to actually encircle them then the north eastern front will be pretty much fricked

            1st Guards Tank Army is fricked. That's about 22k men fricking gone with their equipment. That would be a huge loss for the Russians in men and equipment they can't afford to replace.

            Has there been any other conflict where one side has abandoned so much useful and useable material to the enemy? As in, Ukraine uses so much Russian equipment that they can directly use all types of ammo, vehicles and equipment straight off the battlefield.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They might already be cut off. Their options for retreat are either through the forest or another pontoon adventure. Either way, casualties will be high and most heavy equipment will need to be abandoned.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Kupiansk IS the escape route though. Sure Izyum isn’t completely surrounded, but Kupiansk is the only route that has the infrastructure necessary to efficiently move all of the heavy equipment. Any other route taken would require either abandoning things that can’t be properly replaced or try to take it all at a glacial pace that would probably be rip for artillery/airstrike/ambush/etc.

          Tbh it remains to be seen if Ukraine can actually hold onto their gains, it’ll depend on how they withstand the inevitable countattack. Even so, all this definitely shows that Russia is having fairly serious problems maintaining a frontline over the entire country. They push back here and a gap opens up somewhere else.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Kupiansk IS the escape route though
            this
            >how they withstand the inevitable countattack.
            thats another funny thing, the only sensible route (bar an Izyum breakout) for a counterattack is head on through Kupiansk

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Kupiansk IS the escape route though.
            Not any more, not with the bridge shot up. 🙂

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The entire Donbass pincer is fricked.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The pincer was never going anywhere. Even Russians learned that endless attempts to produce an encirclement won't work.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Depends how they fall
      If Russians manage to evac 80-90% of their soldiers then it's a small tactical victory for Ukraine and perhaps the beginning of a strategic victory
      If Ukies manage to actually encircle them then the north eastern front will be pretty much fricked

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >If Russians manage to evac 80-90% of their soldiers then it's a small tactical victory for Ukraine and perhaps the beginning of a strategic victory
        Nah anon. Kupyansk is super important for logistics. If that and Izyum fall Russia's entire front there is pretty fricked. Highly, highly defensible too. And at this point it's too late to evac well while also preserving their heavy equipment, abandoning all that is more losses they cannot replenish.

        Yeah saving man power would be better than nothing but this is a bad blow and if the UA consolidates a significant strategic loss. And that's ignoring soft factors, huge morale boost for Ukraine AND a significant geopolitics win to show Western donors which ensures aid keeps coming and that the West won't push for any sort of early peace negotiations where Ukraine gives anything up. All very important goals. Victory papers over a lot, Europe will definitely suffer somewhat this winter, not the "freezing in their homes" moronic bullshit vatBlack folk spew out since they cannot envision functioning governments, but there will definitely be some economic pain particularly in Germany as they work to wean themselves of Russian gas in a hurry. And that could in theory promote political pushback.

        But people are a lot more willing to engage in solidarity if they can see it's actually working and worth it and they think they'll win in the end. Ukraine making some big visible breakthroughs before winter is therefore an even bigger deal. I'm sure they've considered that, and of course the risk of over extending by being too aggressive and desperate to show something. But if they pull it off then yeah that could tip the scales in important ways.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Also, if they (the Russians) do decide that manpower > equipment and get the boots out without their gear then all they do is replenish Ukrainian war supplies.

          Ukrainians have more men than equipment (see: waiting lists for volunteers) so every single tank, howitzer, IFV or APC they capture is worth its weight in gold.

          Furthermore, hypothetically speaking, if their offensives in the North and South do work. They will then hold two extremely defensive positions that will free up lots of manpower, especially in the South where hundreds of km's of frontage will be reduced to zero because water obstacle with no bridges. They can then use that manpower to develop local advantages in other areas to do more offensives which in turn can lead to a snowballing effect.
          >shaping the front

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Furthermore, hypothetically speaking, if their offensives in the North and South do work. They will then hold two extremely defensive positions that will free up lots of manpower, especially in the South where hundreds of km's of frontage will be reduced to zero because water obstacle with no bridges. They can then use that manpower to develop local advantages in other areas to do more offensives which in turn can lead to a snowballing effect.
            Good point, and this is the logic of a military route. Gains pile up for more gains, because forces start to get concentrated in useful ways and geography can get taken advantage of to protect flanks with less or no war power devoted to it. UA is going into their own territory so unlike Russia they also don't face the same risk of partisans. In fact in another delicious bit of irony Russia themselves have helped ensure that by using separatists and cannon fodder and force drafting much of the male population that could evade it and would otherwise potentially be more trouble, they've made the locals hate them AND cleared the way for the UA on all fronts! Not that UA doesn't still have to be very careful about their own supply lines and accidentally falling into tactical inferiority despite strategic superiority, history shows instances where that can lead to bad losses. And UA doesn't have much experience with this even if they're learning fast.

            But even there having NATO intelligence and advisors with them is a huge help in avoiding slip ups, as is the Russian army's continued utterly outdated command structure. They simply can't react very well at the tactical level even if opportunity presents itself because they don't have the decentralized initiative and authorization. So while UA undoubtedly will make mistakes I honestly doubt Russ army is even capable of capitalizing on them fast enough, even ignoring that moving the front forward moves HIMARS etc forward too and they keep losing commanders.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Huge loss of equipment and soldiers if Russians don't evacuate
      Logistics around the northeastern front completely fricked
      End of any chance of encirclement of Ukrainian troops in Donbass
      Ukrainians can now use kupyansk as base to launch offensives in Luhansk
      Tl;Dr northeastern front gets fricked

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Huge loss of equipment and soldiers if Russians don't evacuate
        AND it's an injection of supplies to Ukr.
        > same caliber and all

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      1st Guards Tank Army is fricked. That's about 22k men fricking gone with their equipment. That would be a huge loss for the Russians in men and equipment they can't afford to replace.

      Kupyansk Bridge allegedly got blown up

      https://i.imgur.com/QjSiwJD.jpg

      Just saw on /chug/ that the critical bridge got destroyed, too. It's not even worth trolling them at this point, they're so suicidally demoralized that they can't even bantz.

      so there's a good chance. Here's hoping!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If Amerimutt terrorists zergrush it then it's super important.
      If Donetsk and Luhanks and Russian allied forces continue to control it its not important.

      t. glowBlack folk invading /k/

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >bruh the only thing backing around here, are my swollen, backed up nuts. I can't wait to bust a fat one on the lifeless face of some pro-Ru rat humanoid and send it to his loving family.
    If only I could be so grossly based.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Currently Russia is having a massive twitter offensive, about every bot they have fires messages about their big reinforcements arriving at Kupyansk and Ukraine taking massive losses in their failed counter offensive...

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    If the Ukies win, I will print out and cum on any picture of RU colaborators getting killed and/or tortured. I will then mail those pictures to their families.
    Screencap this.

    For when you gaze long into the abyss. The abyss gazes also into you

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Don't hold back, after this is done we'll have our whole lives to find peace and humanity again, meanwhile the vatniks will be dead lmao

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What did we learn today? Losing some of your best forces and machines early in the war will have repercussions, sustained numbers =/= sustained quality, untrained and unmotivated forces will collapse and a small number of veterans cannot carry the burden themselves.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    If the Ukies win, I will print out and cum on any picture of RU colaborators getting killed and/or tortured. I will then mail those pictures to their families.
    Screencap this.

    I've already informed The Hague that they have a new warcrime they should write a ban against. And also to shove it up their ass because as far as I'm concerned when it's Russians the list of warcrimes is an achievement list.

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation turned off comments on its social networks after the loss of Balakleya

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    49.72278093788284, 37.60798088080834

    Photo by a civilian

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That looks pretty north of the city. If the ukies have direct fire on the bridge already the Russians are cooooooked

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Never mind. That bridge is already dropped

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like Ukraine took the gloves off.

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What’s actually going on I don’t understand

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Second Battle of Kharkov. Team blue even has the crosses on their vehicles.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Russia moved the majority of their troops south to head off the hyped up Kherson offensive. They left behind homosexual riot police and DNR conscripts to guard the front near Kharkiv, Ukraine has broken through the front and found no resistance in the rear areas. Now Russia's main supply line to Izyum is cut.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This image will have me chuckling for a while even if original is old, the eternal pontoooner continues to feature in this war and it's great.

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Kupiansk torwards the East side
    Of the River
    49.72278093788284, 37.60798088080834

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Apparently from some minutes ago taken by a civilian

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Which way is this pointing?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Torwards the East side of the city across the River, so from this morning

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The bridge is down
      There is no way to escape out of the Kupyansk

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Bridge is down
        LET'S FRICKING GOOOOOOOO

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        that is a small river they can just quickly throw up some pontoons and encircle the pigs and put a lid on them hohols will be done. WELL done!

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >just pontooon comerade

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          That's The Same River where the pontooning (never) happened.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >mind
          Pontooning isn't something Russians want to do right about now.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Slaughterhouse Copeyansk

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That can still escape north, but it’s a really bad option, they will have to ditch a lot of equipment. Bigger problem for them is the reinforcements at svatove have to detour to help out now

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Kupyansk bridge is falling down, falling down

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Bros...

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      give me ONE good reason why this wouldn't work

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the russian navy

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          > russian navy
          > loses warship to a couple of row boats
          inb4 "but one row boat was steam powered"

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Y'ever think it's crazy how for like 2,000+ years, the entire fate of the world has consistently been decided by the contents of this box

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'm all in on western exceptionalism but that's a clinically moronic take on world history

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    So did the Ukrainians completely break their supply lines or did the Russians just not bother to build secondary defensive lines?
    It seems like they didn't even plan for the possibility of Ukraine breaking through and now that the butthole is wide open they just keep on giving

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They didn’t think Ukraine would attack let alone break through.

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ok, you’re directed by Putin to unfrick this shit.
    He will allow you to cede territory to Ukraine for more favourable defensive positions, he doesn’t want a repeat of Kyiv.
    What do you do? Where do you reinforce your troops to prevent a complete rout?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Ok, you’re directed by Putin to unfrick this shit.
      I immediately defect to the West and enjoy the billions of dollars I've stolen and are now safe in a Sw*ss bank account.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not much you can do, Ukranians have been working on setting victory conditions for months now. The two "offensives" are just the little paragraph that concludes a long essay.

      What is going to happen is going to happen, all you can do is try to mitigate as much damage as possible.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      what they always should have done, take Lysychansk/Sieverodonetsk, Toshivka, and form a line up to Duvanka. To make the cities more defensible, a fluid deployment trying to take everything East of Bakhmutka river (to Zarichne) is appropriate, but no hard combat or heavy armor.
      Stop there, regroup, try again in 8 years.
      As far as the South, literally unsustainable. Taking everything except Kherson was viable, they should have held Nova Kakhova to Vasylivka and turned Oleshky into a fortified position. Depopulate the western delta, because it is going to be nonstop partisan and guerilla warfare if held.
      After Vasylivka, the new line should be Tokmak-Chernihivka-Rozivka-Volnovakha-Dokuchaevsk with a mobile line. This is a sustainable position.
      Everything around Donetsk is a pointless bloodbath but Russia is not in the pilot seat. Donetsk partisans would be acting like spergs there even though Russia has old them not to. The best target would have been Avdiivka as the sole goal for those irregulars.

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Is thereany chance this was done on purpose to then encircle them?

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    A10 WARTHOG KINO FROM THE GROUND IN UKRAINE
    https://t.me/u_now/66077

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'm sorry, anon, but it's an edited video 🙁
      There's always hope, though.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >1000 dead American terrorist later
      >MuttBlack folk winning so much they need to spam fake videos and twitter.gov cope about "likely future potential successess"

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    time to sticky the suicide hotline on /misc/

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I see the ukropiggies are dilating hard, their nato "training" is finally paying off

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Just saw on /chug/ that the critical bridge got destroyed, too. It's not even worth trolling them at this point, they're so suicidally demoralized that they can't even bantz.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      didnt wagner blow it up?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/XcWpEuz.jpg

      >BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
      BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
      >BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
      BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
      >BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
      BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
      >BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
      BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK

      WHAT BRIDGE DEFENSE DOING

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      thats what you say!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I refuse to take anyone with this username, handle and pfp combo seriously.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Boy, the ruskies have utterly failed to protect every strategically important bridge they had didnt they?

      Makes ya wonder whats gonna happen once the Ukis get within range of the Crimea bridge

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Nice trips!

        Not a lot of wondering, they're gonna blow the Kerch Strait Bridge apart. Some of the comments from the UA command structure make me think it's just a few weeks away.

        If you want to bet on timing, there are a couple of bets up on Betmoose about it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/XcWpEuz.jpg

      >BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
      BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
      >BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
      BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
      >BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
      BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
      >BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
      BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK

      Good. Now that they can't run away, the Russians will have to fight and win.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >fight and win.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        There's been some surrendering, so that's always an option

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
    BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
    >BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
    BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
    >BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
    BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
    >BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK
    BRIDGE IN KUPIANSK

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      why worry, tovarisch Steinerov had already crossed this location with his army

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Oh, Hi Mars.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        bruh

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >hello, is this the pontoon deparment?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You have a simple choice
        >VDV
        >Engineering Regiment: Pontoon Specialist
        Which choose?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Now yous can't leave.

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The next mental barrier that will have to be overcome in western (and Ukrainian) consciousness is the idea that territories occupied by Russia in 2014 can't be won back. If the current offensive succeeds, the next or the one after that could perhaps target Donetsk or Luhansk. If ukies take one of those, it will be a psychological blow unliked any before.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If they ever get to a point where thats viable the Russian army will be long gone so its moot.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I heard from one of Ukrainian politicians, that a blow to Donetsk was discussed back in April, as part of a supposed operation to break the encirclement of Mariupol, but it was ultimately decided to be too risky of a maneuver, since if the attack failed, the defensive line in Donbass would collapse.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Problem is that for every visible victory like that you're almost forcing Putin to escalate. And the only thing he has left is nukes. Initially it might be a nuke test on Russian soil just to send a message. This isn't some side conflict like Afghanistan where ultimately the Russians can claim some fabricated victory and move on. Putin has invested way too much political capital into this. He quite literally can't afford to lose this war

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Putin got into power because the last guy got thrown out cuz Chechnya. Just saying, things get bad enough for the Russians maybe the Oligarchs choose a new guy.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          He's keeping the oligarchs well fed and in line. No evidence that the security apparatus or military leadership is abandoning him. I believe he still controls every facet of policy

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        So what? I'm not spreading my cheeks for a crazed dictator just because he has a powerful bomb. Ukies would not, either.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          If there's a reasonable suspicion that Putin will resort to nuclear arms, the US would use all their weight to pressure Zelensky into stopping the war. There is no strategic threat to the US here which means politically a nuclear conflict is a complete non-starter

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            There is a strategic threat of the world and the human civilization itself being held hostage by a maniac with a bomb. At this point, the objective would be not to defeat Russia in Ukraine, but to de-nuclearize Russia, in the interest of all humanity. Even Chinese would hop on board with it, since they wouldn't want a madman with nukes to exist, either.

            However, I still believe that no nukes will be used in any case, as long as NATO is not involved directly, and perhaps even then.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Why didn't he just do this from the start?

            Spoiler: He can't

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Because at the start it wasn't obvious that the Russians would be BTFO in a conventional conflict

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >The United Fricking States
            >Giving into Nuclear pressure
            You do realize that if the US backed down in that case, it's completely over for the West, right? If Putin threatened nukes and the US backed down, Putin would just continuously threaten nukes and get everything he wants without any stopping them.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              It's obvious that Russia is in no state to continue threats to other countries. This isn't a slippery slope, at least in a span of a couple decades. Democracies don't tend to think that long ahead. If this war can be ended relatively quickly with Ukraine fighting the Russians to a heroic draw, this is a narrative that the West can run with.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Russia is in no state to threaten other countries with invasion but they still have nuclear fricking bombs, and they have been CONTINUOUSLY threatening to use them for the last few months. There should never be a moment where any nation gives in to such threats.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I completely agree with you in a strategic sense but in politics very often up is down. Look at Germany's moronic energy policy

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            That's Russky cope you're swallowing. Whats the point of nukes, strategically? If you concede to someone threatening their use because X is not worth MAD, what else in the world is not worth MAD, either, and is now fair game?
            If Russian nukes fly for the sake of international coercion, Russia is getting glassed, simple as

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >If there's a reasonable suspicion that Putin will resort to nuclear arms, the US would use all their weight to pressure Zelensky into stopping the war
            Pure vatBlack person wishful cope.
            >There is no strategic threat to the US here which means politically a nuclear conflict is a complete non-starter
            You literally identified the strategic threat you fricking moron: allowing nuclear weapons to be used by nuclear powers to threaten direct wars of aggression and conquest. That's a HUGE strategic threat, it completely undermines the world. It ALSO completely undermines non-proliferation, because if it's allowed now everyone HAS to have nukes of their own, no question. If you don't, you're directly at risk from those who do.

            That's just utterly unacceptable vs defensive possession. American can never allow it. And the politics of forcing Ukraine to SURRENDER to Russia (that's what your cute little "stopping the war" actually means), while they are winning (!!!), over monke's IM GUNNA NOOOKKKEE would destroy Biden plenty well by themselves.

            So yeah, they'll be "diplomatic" about it but they'll simply ignore it. And then if Russia actually uses nukes they'll "be forced to respond". You're also an obvious vatnik moron because you're assuming Ukraine is some Western puppet because that's how you view relationships, but it's not. If Russia nukes them why would they submit to "pressure" to do anything but fight tooth and nail, to immediately attack Russian cities across the border? Why hold back at all? Why not use their nuclear waste to make dirty bombs and use those? UA actually has been trying to follow the rules overall, unlike Russia. They really DO have "gloves they could take off".

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The rest of the world cannot allow Russia, or anyone else, to win just by threatening to go nuclear.

            It's one thing to let Kim Jong Un keep his existing enslaved population, quite another to let him invade South Korea just because he threatens to nuke Seoul if he doesn't get his way.

            Same thing with Putin. If you let him take Ukraine because otherwise he'll start lobbing nukes, then he can take Poland, Germany, and Finland too.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You don't understand the nuclear taboo and why it exists. No, I repeat, no state actor wants to live in a world where using nukes is actually on the able outside of defending the homeland. If Putinist R*ssia is actually moronic enough to do it anyway they sign their doom. Even if they "just" use a single tactical one, the consequences would be catastrophic for them. And that's assuming there would be no retaliation in kind. They would get isolated more than even Iran and North Korea, dropped by even Ch*na and Ind*a. New sanctions would be drawn up that would make the current ones look like a joke. Kid-sniffer Biden would no longer be able to veto R*ssia being designated a state sponsor of terrorism.

            The current war fricked R*ssia for a decade at least, even if Pootin got couped and sanctions reversed. If they go nuclear they'll frick themselves for the rest of the next half-century at a minimum.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Have you considered that this forces the west to escalate, as well? So far they have been dumb but not outright irrational. Putin and Lavrov can't enjoy blow and hookers freely if Moscow is glassed

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Putin is in a much more precarious position than any western leaders. It's reasonable to assume he will become desperate first. As to glassing Moscow, my point is it will be stopped before that. If he shows willingness to use nukes the war has to end immediately, politically speaking

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >If he shows willingness to use nukes the war has to end immediately
            You can frick right off. The US doesn't get to have anything it wants by flashing nuclear penis, and neither will Russia.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              The madman theory is a legitimate thing in nuclear politics

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        But nuking won't win the war.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It might stop it in its tracks which, when you're losing, is the best you can hope for

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Problem is that for every visible victory like that you're almost forcing Putin to escalate.
        "almost" lol. It's not forcing Putin to do jack shit. And he won't, because it'd be 100% suicide.
        >And the only thing he has left is nukes.
        No, he also has left a million propaganda options where he abandons Ukraine and paints it as some kind of partial victory over HATO contrary to your assertion this can't be done. Of course it can be done. If he stops this shit he'll be able to spend less on the army and more on pacifying important groups of the pop. He'll paper the whole thing over. And who is going to stage a coup? The military was just further wrecked! He has a loyal praetorian guard. He has the oligarchs either under control or bound to go down with him. NATO isn't actually going to just invade Russia. If he retreats back world will be done with him. That's WAY better odds then
        >Initially it might be a nuke test on Russian soil just to send a message. This isn't some side conflict like Afghanistan where ultimately the Russians can claim some fabricated victory and move on. Putin has invested way too much political capital into this. He quite literally can't afford to lose this war
        If he uses nukes he's done, and that's IF they work. Given how rotted out Russian military and tech is, it's very possible he uses nukes, and then they DON'T work. Or like, 1/4 work. And NOW they're well and truly fricked, because their big deterrent is fully exposed as well, AND they're shown as mad enough to try using it anyway. At that point it becomes legitimate to contemplate a US nuclear first strike.

        Putin and co are survivalists. They can try to go nork or something. China won't want to see them completely collapse either. Nuking would be true suicide.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Given how rotted out Russian military and tech is, it's very possible he uses nukes, and then they DON'T work. Or like, 1/4 work. And NOW they're well and truly fricked, because their big deterrent is fully exposed as well,
          Even 1/4 of the Russian nuclear arsenal working is a significant deterrent. Even 1/10th is plenty.

          I don't think anyone understands why the frick Russia made so goddamn many nuclear weapons. Unless there's an invasion by space aliens, there's no point in having an arsenal that large.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            trips of moronation
            >Even 1/4 of the Russian nuclear arsenal working is a significant deterrent. Even 1/10th is plenty.
            No it isn't. They're down to like 1500 officially ("warheads in storage" are worthless, none of them can be made useful in time for a second strike). A first strike will take out a huge percentage of those, that's precisely why countries want so many. If 1/4 work (let alone 1/10) they're down to 375. 1st strike takes out another 75-90%. Now you're down to as little as ~40 working ones. Are ALL of them going at America? If not cut that further, but even if so proceed. The US does have BMD at this point, not enough for a huge saturation attack absolutely, but we're no longer talking a huge saturation attack. Can it deal with dozens? And will Russia have programmed ALL of the warheads for counter-value? That'd be unlikely, the default includes a ton that are counter force, ie., aimed at American military infrastructure including bases and our own ICBMs. But lots of THAT is very, very purposefully placed in the middle of nowhere. Part of the whole point of which is precisely to "absorb" inbound nukes far away from populations.

            There is now a chance literally zero make it through to anything very important.
            >I don't think anyone understands why the frick Russia made so goddamn many nuclear weapons. Unless there's an invasion by space aliens, there's no point in having an arsenal that large.
            It's clearly you who don't understand the math here, what the modern forces look like, or why only having a fraction work is a big threat. You're exactly right they have a lot for a reason. But that reason isn't "well, maybe only 10% work before we even launch" it's to ensure enough get through even after lots are wiped. But if you START by cutting by a factor of 4-10? Buh-buy.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              You're looking at it from the wrong direction. No one in power wants to lose NYC. I personally wouldn't mind, but Biden, Pelosi, and Schumer wouldn't risk it.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >You're looking at it from the wrong direction. No one in power wants to lose NYC. I personally wouldn't mind, but Biden, Pelosi, and Schumer wouldn't risk it.
                Only Biden matters here, right or wrong he doesn't need any further permission to use our nuclear arsenal whenever he wants. But all of them would anyway if they think they won't lose NYC and that also there is a risk the US will get nuked and/or their careers destroyed anyway. They're capable of long term thinking as is our own military. If Russia is willing to use nukes offensively for conquest the domino effects are obvious if they get away with it. And if it turns out they show a major weakness in doing so proving objectively that only a fraction works, then the right decision to defend NYC is to act immediately. With the state of the Russian military I guarantee you the US probably knows exactly where 97% of Russian active nukes are located and are actively tracking and tailing most if not all of their functioning boomers. If the JCS can tell Biden with assurance that there is a limited window before Russia disperses where they can eliminate nearly everything and BMD + Russian failures can mop up the rest, and Russia is already engage in nuclear escalation? Sure we don't know exactly what Biden would decide, but that works both ways.

                And there are other escalators too. Eastern Europe will demand military response out of self preservation. Now Russia nukes them too, etc etc.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Only Biden matters here, right or wrong he doesn't need any further permission to use our nuclear arsenal whenever he wants.
                Biden has pudding for brains and everyone knows it. He may be legally required to be the figurehead who launches the nukes, but he's not the one making the decisions.

                He can't even read a TelePromTer without fricking it up.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                CIA told the Russians through various contacts and channels that If Putin used a tactical nuclear weapon in Ukraine, their nuclear capabilities would be rendered useless by such devastating and humiliating missile spam that the US wouldn’t need to escalate to the nuclear option.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I actually believe it now

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >CIA told the Russians through various contacts and channels that If Putin used a tactical nuclear weapon in Ukraine, their nuclear capabilities would be rendered useless by such devastating and humiliating missile spam that the US wouldn’t need to escalate to the nuclear option.
                If the US could actually eliminate Russia's nukes conventionally then this is even easier. I don't think the US actually has that capability yet, while we experimented with HGVs and the like in the 60s/70s I'm pretty sure all our ICBMs/SLBMs are conventional and air breather hypersonics aren't ready yet. I don't think conventional cruise missiles, or new stealth bombers capable of getting where they need to go, would work either. And I don't think CIA would actually do any such reveal.

                But if the capability is there then 100% it'd be immediately used in that case, there is no reason to hold back at all then if it's not even nuclear. And then if Russia counters with nuclear launch and any make it and work, well THEN it's still inviting a counter strike.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >you're almost forcing Putin to escalate
        Or the Russians could literally just go home.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I wish
        a homie
        would

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        omg i can only be so hard

        set off a nuke on russian soil??!! I am signing up for the Foreign Legion now!

        ps. it's officer to you

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Putin quite literally can't afford to win this war either.

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    New cope just dropped.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >a bunch of civilians with fresh r*ssian passports are gonna get tortured & slaughtered
      God I hope.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Sadly it's more likely gonna be another
        >Look! This dead civilian is surrounded by russian military gear!
        >Clearly they were shot for accepting russian aid!

        Though there is already some screaching about a collaborationist mayor being arrested.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >a bunch of civilians with fresh Russian passports are gonna get tortured & slaughtered

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >happy crowds out on the streets
      >babushkas tearing up and kissing Ukie soldiers
      t-terrible optics guys

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >slaughtered
      They use that word ALOT. It's almost as if they can't think of people as anything but cattle

  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  46. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the russians are melting

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Mattis would be proud

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This swift and tempoful advance makes me wonder, where are all the forces that captured those areas to begin with? Are they all in Kherson?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Sure looks like it. Which is an incredibly moronic move but the ruskis did it anyway.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The Izyum direction was the main avenue of attack, then they were turned over into the severodonetsk and lysychansk front before the line stagnated. With heavy casualties along all these steps and the Kherson pivot it makes sense that it ended up so depopulated

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      hitler would be proud

  48. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    is 'pontoon' an inherently funny word, or did it just become hilarious due to the events of the past few months?

    I can no longer tell

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      English words containing double o are inherently funny.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        'doom'?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        'doom'?

        troon
        balloon
        coon
        soon
        abandoon

  49. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I"m gonna clooose, uh oh I'm cloooooooooooooosing

  50. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Im gonna abandooooon

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      These gestures of good will are getting bit overwhelming.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      USA engineers must be drolling over oportunity to get their hand on those.

      Theu didn't have chance to disassemble Russian top secter hardware since cold war.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What can they do with all the info from Russian tech, since their own is already superior?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          electronic countermeasures go from "jam" to "disable"
          In the 80's some clown stole the Navy's encryption codes for the Sparrow and the Phoenix, and until new ROMs were made and distributed through the fleet, the Navy was afraid that if they shot one of those at anyone they would just drop from the sky by ECM.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Anon, they captured a Krasukha EW complex outside Kiev in March.
        It was sent to the US for inspection already.
        They’ll pick apart this radar as well.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I think they're starting to lose their appetite. After all, it's not like R*ssia is likely to ever deploy these again. It's really just more of a curiosity now, reverse-engineering it now doesn't really get them anything anymore.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Those poor Polish airport workers. So many overtime shifts.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Why don't they sabotage it before retreat?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        this would take time they don't have and competence and forethought that they lack

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        because its not a retreat, its a rout

  51. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Where have we seen this before?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Youre right

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      except this time the US is not supporting the Soviet army and as it turns out it is not capable of advancing too far from its borders on its own capabilities

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Russians are not Soviets and do not have the skill, morale, or raw manpower to die 2-for-1 and retake a strategically difficult position. Pic related is closer to the current situation from a force deployment standpoint.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Do you have any fricking idea how much of manpower and logistics Operation Ur anus actually took and how long it was being prepared?

  52. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I was at work for two hours what the frick happened?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >MOL-1
      Space Force gooooooo

  53. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >muh nukes
    threatening nukes over an aggressive conflict when the existence of your state is not in danger (the russian nuclear doctrine) would alienate russia not just from the west but also from india and china
    nobody is interested in nuclear escalation because it affects everyone

  54. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    A Zoopark-1 1L219 counter battery system was capped somewhere in Kharkiv recently

  55. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      nice post ironic meme, zoomer

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Russian MOD vs UK tabloid

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Anon, I...
      The guy on the left is a Russian propagandist.
      It's THAT bad.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Rybar is now globohomosexual propaganda
      Neat.

  56. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    For better visualization, animated.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ukraine/comments/x9ym5k/animated_map_of_ukrainian_counter_attack_in/

  57. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Russian armor protection working as intended

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      so, wait, what the frick happened?
      Troops riding the BVM got sprayed down with fire, with the tankers being fricking oblivious, then driving into a tree trying to take a corner because they can fricking see where they're going, injuring whoever was left hanging on for dear life?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This is another one that would be great with a Benny Hill Show soundtrack.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        i gotchu senpai

        https://twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1568282616373059586

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The original video does have it.
          https://twitter.com/praisethesteph/status/1568283061644627970

          The memes really write themselves.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The original video does have it.
        https://twitter.com/praisethesteph/status/1568283061644627970

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      OOF

      so, wait, what the frick happened?
      Troops riding the BVM got sprayed down with fire, with the tankers being fricking oblivious, then driving into a tree trying to take a corner because they can fricking see where they're going, injuring whoever was left hanging on for dear life?

      >injuring whoever was left
      if they took a fricking tree to the face they're not just "injured"

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >if they took a fricking tree to the face they're not just "injured"
        I was being generous, because they probably already have been sprayed down by AR or MG fire before then; getting impaled by a branch wouldn't be pleasant either though

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      what the fugg :DDD

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You can even see Zs painted on teh era on the front of the turret so it is def a Russian tank

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      NO WAY

  58. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Nyet panik. Nyet panik! NEYT PANIK!!

  59. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    https://twitter.com/Gadzhega/status/1566531398885859328?s=20&t=kCrP5rA8k2CFKY6qLNK-VA

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Is this a warcrime?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        possibly falls under "cruel and unusual" punishment, but a rather low-tier one, considering
        >I was made to eat a Ritz cracker piled with hot sauce back in junior high

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It's not even hot sauce. Mild-medium salsa at best.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        And kind of an attack where you hurt the prisoner for no reason is a war crime even if you just slap him lightly after he surrenders.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        War?

  60. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I just want to say I love you anons. The level of shitposting and stuff coming out of this war is mind blowing. I never expected this level of entertainment to happen back in February.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *