Latest US aid package includes over 100 new bradleys and 100 m113.

Latest US aid package includes over 100 new bradleys and 100 m113. This more than replaces any Bradley that has been destroyed, damaged, or abandoned

https://www.forbes.com/sites/vikrammittal/2024/05/17/ukraine-is-receiving-more-m2-bradleys-and-m113s-from-the-us/?sh=76e03b2c4799

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >M113
    Gavin bros we're so back.

    >verification not required

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      luv me gav's
      simple as

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    moar
    MOAR

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    God the Bradley is so good bros

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    NATO forces will once again be destroyed by the sadly superior Russian military. I do not understand why NATO continues to try invading. Our military has been gutted by "diversity" and has forgotten how to fight. This is something we should avoid against an opponent like Russia

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, you are saying truth NATO bro. We must stop that embarrassment and concentrate on our own problems like for example black people and chinamen.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        stop encouraging low-effort b8 moron

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      (you)

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >100 m113
    THE COWARDS, THE FOOLS!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      WE
      *Asthma attack*
      WE SHOULD TAKE AWAY
      THEIR METAL BAWKSES

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >100
    seeing all the numbers of what russia has lost this war makes these kinds of donation seem almost insulting. but sure, better than nothing.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    good for the Bradley
    but warriortard is still a sad pathetic homosexual

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Praise be his name, Omar Bradley

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >100 tin cans and 100 mobile coffins
    Add those 20 F16's Ukrainians have been begging for the last 2 years and war is basically won

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Bradleys have had an outsized effect and this package includes more Bradleys than Russia has managed to destroy or damage put together.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >outsized
        Yeah the Bradley is definitely outsized aleright. It's just a fat BMP, what effect did it have? List the achievements of the Bradley in Ukraine.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Well right if the bat they used Bradley’s to liberate robotyne from Russia. It was hard to ignore the images of every major media outlet in the world showing Bradleys evacuating civilians who were stuck in robotyne under heavy artillery fire. There is no denying Bradley supremacy

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/09/05/europe/ukraine-zaporizhzhia-robotyne-bradley-intl-cmd

          https://www.newsweek.com/bradley-fighting-vehicles-ukraine-avdiivka-47th-brigade-russia-1857732

          https://www.businessinsider.com/ukraine-credits-us-bradley-armored-vehicles-holding-back-russian-forces-2024-1?amp

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >When dropping barely a brigade's worth of american 30-years old surplus is enough to hold the soviet tank rush
            Reagan really was outplayed by Gorbatchev : the old commie knew his country didn't stand a chance and still manage to get a better deal than they deserve.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          > The Russian military would've overrun Ukrainian positions on a key part of the front line if Ukraine didn't have US-supplied Bradley armored vehicles, a soldier told CNN.
          > The report said the Bradley armored vehicles had been vital in holding off Russian attacks near the town of Avdiikva, eastern Ukraine, which has been the target of fierce Russian attacks.

          https://ca.news.yahoo.com/bradley-armored-vehicles-us-stopped-123156870.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAE0Wjigkl9cje7vZQS-L-mWMGOw5yUjqOyVdcJLkPoxu3zz32bDl_BKhinYquEb2YkLtX9mnBfYxQVfxZl0-rpBEoIvgOC0xE_iRSHD2zj9NuyVv81LI2VlrXM0WvGyqQxiE9Z3mW6-Ke-zvf_YoL4-oh7kInbdlNI5wANIivKa5

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >List the achievements of the Bradley in Ukraine
          Well there's that one video where you can see a vatBlack person's head explode like a watermelon as a 25mm hits it, pretty fricking cool if you ask me.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >List the achievements of the Bradley in Ukraine.
          1. kino
          2. more kino
          Why has the Bradley succeeded while the Abrams and Leopards were less effective? I don't think it is just based on numbers of vehicles

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >young Russian hottie pounded into submission by grizzled American stud

            K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK K-CHUNK

            GET DISABLED GET DISABLED GET DISABLED GET DISABLED GET DISABLED GET DISABLED GET DISABLED GET DISABLED GET DISABLED GET DISABLED GET DISABLED

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Probably the same reasons they claimed more armored vehicle kills in Iraq than the MBTs. Generally you don't want to have tank-on-tank fights, you want to use your forces fighting things they can crush with minimal cost. So given the choice, you send tanks to fight light vehicles and AFVs rather than MBTs. Hence, the Bradley is supporting exactly the kind of units you'd rather deploy a tank against, therefor it met and destroyed more enemy tanks. Gross oversimplification but you get the idea.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Well numbers aside i suspect the following
            >ease of maintenance, keeping the tracks rolling
            >high mobility, less weight means it can easily drive through terrain that would bog down a tank
            >outstanding survability, its not a tank, but there isnt much on the battlefield right now capable of disabling a bradley, that wouldnt also disable a tank, meanwhile its perfectly capable of taking hits that would disable a BMP
            >versatile, it can do recon, transport, evac, assaults, it slices, it dices, move usage means more oportunities to ruin someones day with a 25mm autocannon

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Need more M109s, 155mm shells and HIMARS units.

    Probably more Patriot clips too.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    In other news Ukies are still experimenting with M1A1 and Kontakt 1 ERA on how to properly cover some week spots

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >cope cages on the Abrapps
      Ahahahahahaga I thought cope cages were a stupid Russian invention that doesn't work

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It don't work agiasnt fricking javelin missiles shitskin. FPV and RPG with kornet and arty it does

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The idea was nice.
        The implementation was shit.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Well for starters this design doesnt cover the hatches, meaning the tank performance isnt particularly degraded, the US has already used similar armor packages in Iraq

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Huh, turns out you can make a cope cage that doesn't look like it was fabricated by an Oakland crackhead at 3am

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait to see new Barpley kino. New himars shit would be good to see as well.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >New himars
      They already have a backlog of several systems, which won't be there until 2025 because the US refuses to use their own stock. This has been known for two years at this point. The ones that were suppose to arrive in 2025 are only 'theorised' to arrive then. There is no actual date. But it was three years to produce one. The issue is that these systems were suppose to be for Ukrainian military rebuild, as in the US expected the war to be done by 2025. So will it be delivered? We don't know.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And just like that NATO is being demilitarized in Ukraine. You fools are falling for it, T14 will eat your hardware for lunch.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >100 m113
    Call me when we get some VADS.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    b-but what about our S-s-southern border???
    >haha jk based
    >TZD

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And they all have trophy systems installed on them this time

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *