>Kherson is collap-

>Kherson is collap-

APOLOGIZE RIGHT FRICKING NOW

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That's right Zisters, we're not losing as fast as we thought we would! Ukrops BTFO!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Kherson is literally designed to soak up ukronazi attacks and be a meat grinder. The dumb Ukies fell for the trap

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >TH-THE PLAN WILL WORK THIS TIME, PROMISE!

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It is working, moron

          Of course, there is no bridge to flee like in Karkhiv.

          They are doomed.

          You've been saying they're doomed for u months now

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Russian victory in 2 more weeks, yeah?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Haha stupid HATO tranies you will never grasp genius of Russian bear. We wanted to lose territory we just annexed and thousands Russians died conquering it.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              wasn't this the bear they dug up during the kherson offensive that got concussed?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No this is after hohols failed attack on Lyman, because Russians wanted hohols to take that city too.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Poor bear 🙁

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Kherson is a long sock for the ruski hamster to sit in while Ukraine bangs him against the walls like a flail. The accuracy advantage in artillery plus ruskies having to cross a wide body of water with supplies and back again if retreating makes this whole thing a suicide. Huge number of Russians will get captured in the end, when they have another round of panicking and fleeing.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Kherson is a long sock for the ruski hamster to sit in while Ukraine bangs him against the walls like a flail
          Fricking kek

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Kherson is a long sock for the ruski hamster to sit in while Ukraine bangs him against the walls like a flail.

          Such a way with words.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Kherson is a long sock for the ruski hamster to sit in while Ukraine bangs him against the walls like a flail.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >ukraine practices defense in depth
        >AHAHA UKROPS LOOSING LAND HARD AHAHA COPE HOHOLS POCCNR IS WINNING
        >russia practices defense in depth
        >STUPID KHOKHOL UKRONAZI STRATEGICALLY LOOSING LAND IS SMART YOU'RE GOING INTO THE MEATGRINDER
        >verification not required

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          what's the strategic advantage of using defense in depth during an invasion? aren't you meant to be capturing territory

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >LOOSING
          Learn to spell, please. Losing. It's a single O.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            God, you just know there’s a special kind of ass pain connected to people who try to correct speling errors on this cite.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Defense in depth requires you to have some form of actual depth. Being pushed between a riverbank, enemy forces and the borders of the city your suppose to hold isn't depth

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Both Ukrainians and Russians work on the Soviet tactic of a staggered retreat.
          So some territory changing hands isn't even worth mentioning, unless of course it is such an uter catastrophe as in Kharkiv.

          basically this

          Don't fall for shills no side is clearly winning right now and this war could last years. In a month or two momentum will shift again and it will be Russias turn to take some worthless villages and only then can we make an estimate of who's attacks have a bigger impact

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            How does defending an unresuppliable position actually work?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Kherson is seemingly being resupplied via boats. If they didn't have supplies they would have fallen already. I'm not saying it isn't a logistical challenge but Kherson is a port city and those tend to have a lot of logistical infrastructure that in this case can benefit Russia.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What happens when boats are in range of regular artillery?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Well, given that boats are easily visible from radar, must be refilled from known mooring points and have to be stationary for a considerable amount of time to fill up their hold.....

                You do the maths

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I don't know anon. I do know that Russians aren't getting their supplies through magic though so they might use several smaller boats or tugs. I'm sure if I you where a russian logistics officer you could come up with a few ideas yourself friend.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >clearly no side is winning right now
            When you invade with near-total strategic and tactical surprise, lose half your tanks and elite units, get pushed back to a riverbank and encircled in an unescapable town, you are losing.
            Short of something magical like every single Russian instantly being killed by precision munitions the minute they crossed the border I honestly can't see how they could more clearly be losing.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Russian instantly being killed by precision munitions the minute they crossed the border
              No, they are instead dying in russian barracks across the border from diseases like dysentery, cholera, and TB.
              This is the true power of the russian. They can kill their conscripts en masse without them even needing to step foot on enemy lands.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >All this shit and we still have Russian winter + whatever Magic Ukraine pulls off before the frost sets in to go
                Oh my god they're actually going to boogaloo aren't they...

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          So it makes sense to puccians to use defense in depth while being the invading force?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You should fortify your positions, really dig in there so they couldn't move you from your trenches if they wanted to. There's no way they can pinpoint artillery and drones right on top of you.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They literally can and have been. Maybe Russians and Russian gear can't. Ukies with NATO gear literally can and have been this whole time and it's huge part of why there's such disproportionate ground being gained by such a small force.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            That was kind of my joke. Though I suppose if they have buildings to hide in it might be a touch harder I suppose. But I think Russia already shelled out most of them.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Did I ever tell you what the definition of insanity is?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >AND IT JUST KEEPS GETTING FUNNIER

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >EVERY CITY IS GROZNY
        >CONSCRIPTS WILL FIGHT TO THE DEATH IN THE RUBBLE LIKE AZOV NAZIS
        lmao

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They don't need to. Kherson has an abysmal strategic position in the current point of the war because at the current angle of approach, it would be insane to push into Kherson.

        Instead, a far smarter option would be to fix it and then ignore it. And then just capture everything east of the Dnipro and wait for the Russian garrison to inevitably wave the white flag and purchase their freedom with a shitton of viable heavy equipment. Ukraine would be committing a massive strategic blunder if they'd spent their momentum on block-to-block fighting in Kherson.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It doesn't even need to be a meat grinder. Hohols are losing so many men with every offensive it'd insane.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Source: I made it the frick up.

          Also, as far as infantry losses go, Ukraine can soak that shit up at the current rate of attrition for a year to come. Its about 5.5 million men away from total sustainable mobilization and actually has a waiting list of volunteers. I think that as far as attrition goes, they'll be fine as long as morale holds.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >doesn't deny it
            HAHAHAHAHA even /k/oper natotrannies have to admit their pigsters are dying en masse

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Given how hilariously inflated Russian estimates have been in the past, we can ignore those. Ukraine has given a somewhat realistic number while they were still in the defensive phase of being about 47k losses out of which 10k being KIA's in June. This roughly maps with the ratio that you'd expect defenders to lose manpower.

              Is Ukraine losing more manpower on aggregate at this point in the war? Yes, by a considerable margin. It is basically a fricking given when conducting offensive operations. Is it anywhere near unsustainable levels? No. Its not even close. There are many things that could become an issue to Ukraine down the line. Manpower ain't on the list.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I remember how fricking salty they were at one point they unironically added +1000 to their UAVs shot down list, and posted a propaganda vid of having shot down 1000 Bayraktars

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >ukraine makes up shit
                >ONG SO TRUE BASED UKIES
                >Russia makes up shit
                >UMM PROOFS? I AM SUDDENLY A RATIONAL SCEPTIC
                Also, you admit hohols lost more manpower, checkmate

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Stop dodging mogilization, vanya.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                when they hang all you puccian shills by your guts, then there will be peace in the world. I hope every government does what the balt states did to Puccian fifth columnists. If it were ever possible to torment someone's soul without allowing it to pass to the afterlife, puccians and their shills should be subject to it for a thousand years before being sent off

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                R*ssians lie as they breathe though

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ....Yes, they are in fact losing more manpower rushing down trenches than they are sitting in their own waiting for the inevitable daily line of morons making a half-hearted effort at capturing them to avoid getting charged for insubordination.

                Unless you take your enemy by surprise or your name is America, you'll always lose more in offensive operations than you do in defensive operations.

                Furthermore, Ukraine's report closely match that of western intelligence communities and common heuristics for the type of war they are in. For example, it matches the 1:3 wounded ratio you'd normally expect while Russia is somehow claiming that Ukraine has a baffling 2:1 ratio of deaths to wounded.

                But yeah, Ukraine will see more losses. And these losses would have to be multiplied by around 3x to meaningfully dampen morale and about 10x to seriously harm their long term prospects. A gentle reminder that Ukraine has the same mobilization potential as France in 1914 and aren't anywhere in the same realm of existance as WW1 attrition losses. I would say the same for Russia but decades of stock mismanagement and literally sending their trainers to the front in hope of a magical breakthrough kinda fricked their mobilization prospects for at least a year

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          easy to make up numbers in your head all day long vatBlack person. Now get me another hoagie while I watch vatBlack folk burn in hell today.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Based. So we agree that it's To The Last Ukrainian.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >to the last Ukrainian
              >loses 61,000 vatBlack folk, countless donbabweans, and thousands of wagner cucks and akhmats
              if you want to lose what's left of your professionals too, don't let us stop you

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                How many dead hohols?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                defensive war, even if they had 3x of the casualities as the russians, they are still figting for survival. For some fricked up reason so does the russians, weird how this land grab is working.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Trying to pretend helping people defend themselves is immoral is next level chutzpah

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Hohols are losing so many men....
          Yet I don't see you enumerating how many men the Puccians are losing. Even if its 1:1, you're still going to end up depleted and non-combat ready.

          Also, "Hohol" is a racial slur. The kind of language a Nazi would use. I suspect it is time to "Denazify" Kherson. (Or at least perform some smacktard fumigation.)

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >the anus is spreading!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >ukronazi
        Schizo

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You know you're not gonna get that paycheck right vatnik? Your boss is pocketing it right now.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Was anyone expecting something else?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Kherson is literally designed to soak up ukronazi attacks and be a meat grinder. The dumb Ukies fell for the trap

      bla bla bla

      Theiy're reteating nonetheless

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Of course, there is no bridge to flee like in Karkhiv.

    They are doomed.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sounds like it's collapsing

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >artillery now has less area to focus on, is closer and can fire from more directions
    Yeah, long fight ahead...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      makes it easier to us to destroy ukronazi artillery

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Russia only uses those to terrorise civilians. Just like all their other weapons really.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >us
        Won't stop you from losing.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Weird that Russia is using Ukrainian drones when I was told they weren't running low on long range missiles.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    even if Kherson was taken right this instant, it soaked up AT LEAST 55k dead Oinkranians. Russia withdrew orderly like in Kharkiv and sent the piggies into pre-prepared killzones.
    But sure, tell me how the 22nd Kherson counteroffensive will be different this time 🙂

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Inb4, I am not mad at the

      but no one except paid russian shills (and serbs, which are like paid shills, but they get paid in russian cum) use "piggies" and "Oinkranians"

      >:)

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nah he's trolling.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I've been looking for that image. Do you have the screenshot of the Russian asking for weapons and the chink telling him no?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Wonder if that is actually what Xi is thinking. They could probably have helped Russia at some point with some supplies, but it doesn't sound like any have been found have they? Any chinese mre's or anything?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              nothing obviously chinese was found so far to my knowledge. I think they dug up some nork artillery shells sometime during the Kharkiv thunder run.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Wonder if that is actually what Xi is thinking. They could probably have helped Russia at some point with some supplies, but it doesn't sound like any have been found have they? Any chinese mre's or anything?

                It benefits China for Russia to lose. They can buy up all the industries and resources in Russia at bargain basement prices.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >They could probably have helped Russia at some point with some supplies
              lol no, why would they? The West would sanction their ass all around and their economy is based on export. Chinks are not going to do shit for ruskies because theres not advantage. They want weak russia to buy cheap natural resources

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >chinese MREs
              cue SteveMRE poisoning himself twice

              >Wonder if that is actually what Xi is thinking.
              He gibs equipment, it'll get misused, captured or even sold to western powers, causing a gigantic embarassment after actual decades of chest thumping and posturing that tiger most powerful rawr. Mind you, all power CCP has comes from the impression of power and said chest thumping and between 0 Covid policies, economic shitshows (mostly coming from said policies), financial shitshows, housing shitshows, floods, droughts, other ecological shotshows hitting the largest cities, corruption that makes Russia seem pure and a demographic crisis, changs are at their limits even by their bugmen standards

              or Xi could refuse, entrench further, maintain status quo and scoop up some resources at the upcoming blowout sale.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The important thing about geopolitics to remember whenever shit hits the fan:

                Russia has no allies. They have hostages, they will run the second the door is open and Russia is distracted.

                China has no allies. They have a web of marriages of convenience where in they will frick over the other party at the earliest convenient point. Its why nowadays an agreement with China isn't worth more than the paper its written on, or why they decimated the credibility of BRI on account of them constantly fleecing the partners they were trying to make with it.

                You can see this quite clearly because China isn't doing what is best for their alliance. They are doing what is best for China. Which at this point is strategic ambiguity and in a few months time will be buying up Russian bankruptcies under the pretense of economic support.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Well I guess they have their own stuff to deal with in terms of economy and internal strife. Also no need to get involved in that fricking mess for, I dno what, benefit. That is not to say they havent done anything, but your supposedly strong manly ”ally” slipping on a banana peel and revealing himself as a useless shit doesnt lend the shifty chinks to rushing to their aid, not while you can make more lucrative deals with them due to their predicament.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              China is a peaceful country unlike amerikkka

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >please ignore the historical huge amount of internal conflict that took place behind the curtain.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                And the two invasions they have had.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Internal conflict doesn't count.

                >initiated 0 conflicts
                Didn't China invade Vietnam after we got done there?

                No. Just ask Vietnam, there was no war.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Vietnamese_War
                This seems like a war.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >initiated 0 conflicts
                Didn't China invade Vietnam after we got done there?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Failed too as I recall.
                Did they help North Korea with their war? Or at least now they are the only ones keeping the regime from collapsing.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                They sent a force of 800,000 men to North Korea in the 50's and engaged in direct combat with UN forces. They called it a volunteer force so as to distant it from the official Chinese army, on paper at least.

                The CCP clearly didn't give a flying frick about the prospect of getting nuked by the USA in response (which they totally could have done). This is in stark contrast to the situation in Europe today where everyone is seemingly treading on eggshells around Putin because of 'muh nooks'.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It would've done if Truman wasn't such a pussy and told McArthur to take his schizo meds

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yep, tried to steal a bunch of land and re-install pol-pot/the khmer rouge. They managed to shift the border a few miles but otherwise lost. Same thing happened when they invaded india in the 60s.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                That’s...not even remotely correct, I mean yeah it is for America mostly but Jesus they don’t even try for China.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Do they not see that such posts make them look weak?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                They don’t, everything is about looking good, even if it’s just skin deep.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The People's Republic of China has initiated zero wars*

                *The First Taiwanese Straits Crisis, the Sino-Vietnamese War of 1979, the Sino-Soviet Border Wars, the Sino-Indian War of 1962, the Sino-Indian War of 1967, the 1950 Invasion of Tibet, the Chinese Intervention in the Korean War, the Second Taiwanese Straits Crisis, the Sino-Vietnamese Border Skirmishes (1979-1991), the Sino-Indian Border Skirmishes of 2020-2021, the Xinjiang Conflict, and the Battle of the Paracel Islands not included

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Their handwave for all of those is that those territories are all China rook at map Zheng He took shit here many century before so is now China forever.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the war on sparrows, the war on students, the war on truth, the war on uyghurs, the war on common sense

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Vietnam, Tibet, Sino-Soviet conflicts on top of my head.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Black person, the Sino-Vietnamese war was 43 years ago and it ended in ~90

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >not even a proxy war

                The frick was the korean war then? And the conflict with vietnam? The border skirmish with the USSR? The occupation of tibet?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >China
                >Initiated
                >USA
                >Waged

                Yeah, nice wording, c**t

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I fricking hate seeing these chicom propagandists all over the internet. I can't wait for the embarrassment they will suffer when they get BTFO during an attempted invasion of Taiwan.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Noguns here, what am I looking at? Bulets tumbling mid flight, with implied shit accuracy?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Bulets tumbling mid flight, with implied shit accuracy?
                >Bullets Tumbling in mid flight, which means actual shit accuracy, all at a short range where the bullets should not under any circumstance be "key-holing" like that.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Noguns here, what am I looking at? Bulets tumbling mid flight, with implied shit accuracy?

                It's normally posted to show how shit Chinese rifles are, but I'm going to play devil's advocate for a minute.

                Historically it wasn't uncommon for countries to use wooden bullets to tip their blanks. This allows for standard case production to be used for training rounds, and usually eliminates the need for a blank-fire muzzle adapter in actions that would otherwise require one. China does like doing things cheap, after all. The downside to this tyope of blank is a nominal decrease in safety, as you are now firing a light-weight easily frangible projectile with every blank. Again, china. We've seen enough liveleak footage to gauge their opinions on safety margins.

                If china does use this kind of blank for live-fire exercises the result would look a lot like the video. The fake bullets are too lightweight to stabilize in standard rifling, and will start to tumble as soon as they leave the muzzle. All targets are also within a close enough distance to the shooter that keyholing projectiles are still likely to hit them.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What the frick are you on about. Blank firing adapters are used in war gaming, not marksmanship. Why the frick would anyone train marksmanship with blanks LMAO. The rounds are tumbling because China once again copied a Western concept, but didn't read the book so he copied the mistakes made by our old homework. In about 4 years they'll release a new ammo variant fixing their stabilization issues

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Why the frick would anyone train marksmanship with blanks LMAO
                You answered your own question.
                >because China once again copied a Western concept, but didn't read the book so he copied the mistakes made by our old homework.
                I'm just posting a supposition, but it fits.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                and at 71 years the Chinks kill 40 million of their own people

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              China doesn’t want a strong Russia. They want a compliant client state that they can use for resource extraction. Letting the Russians beat their head against Ukraine and come crawling to China for economic relief is in their best interest.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              The only thing China cares about is avoiding the same sanctions as Russia, they aren't going to burn down their export based economy for Putin's USSR nostalgia trip.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              China has even stopped blaming NATO/US for Russia's invasion. The UN confirmed yesterday that they took out all the wording implicating them. They still haven't blamed it on Putin, but still. They also have said that Putin using a nuke is unacceptable.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Honestly at this point china probably benefits more from a weak russia than a strong one

              They get a vassal state, they can encroach upon the ex-soviet sphere of influence, and since they "technically" didnt pick a side, their relationships with Europe are more or less the same

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You haven't even begun to touch on the benefits to China from Russia shitting the bed this hard.
                All those African regimes both have been courting for resources are now going to go with China because Russia have been cucked and humiliated on a global stage.
                Then there's the fact that nobody is ever going to want to buy their shitbox Ork-tier military garbage again.
                China is laughing all the way to the fricking Bank, then back again.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Why the frick would China help Russia?
              They are salivating at the thought of being able to pick apart Russia if it collapses.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >chinese MRE's

              frickin steve had worse experiences with them than rations that were made in WW2 lmao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Damage to the base is said to be heavy and the Israeli Jets are reported to have made it back to their headquarters

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Anon Steve ate MREs from WW1 that were better and didn't prompt vomiting.

                Wonder if that is actually what Xi is thinking. They could probably have helped Russia at some point with some supplies, but it doesn't sound like any have been found have they? Any chinese mre's or anything?

                Allegedly the Chinese thought the US was just trying to stir shit when we told them the Russians were planning to invade, because Russia basically told them it was just posturing. China seems to have felt slighted by the Russian invasion for making them look like assclowns, and the Chinese do not take losing face very well. So China seems quite content to let Russia drown in a pool of its own piss to make this point: China is no longer the "junior" partner to the USSR. It never liked that feeling in their relationship to begin with. China is now the superior in the relationship, and if 50,000 Russians need to die in Putin's vanity project to make this point, so be it. China no longer views Russia as anything more than a gas station and open strip mine.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              chink banter has been so good so far in the war lmao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Their banter is top tier when they aren't butthurt about being chinkoids

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The lesson is we need to constantly have one country JUSTing itself for everyone to laugh at together, then we're perfectly capable of coexisting with the Chinks in peace.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Being called a subhuman by chang of all the things
            How mighty have fallen...

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Imagine when the pajeets start calling Russians subhumans and stocking their prostitutehouses with Natashas...

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It took less than a month for the Ukis to capture an iranian drone almost intact, the chinese would have to be extremely dumb to give the russians anything more complex than a pair of scissors, since it would be in ramstein by the end of the week

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          i just googled weak goose...

          I have no idea why chinks call russians geese? Just because they are white, loud, aggressive, and shit everywhere ? Are pajeets called ducks (brown,stupid and still shit everwhere)?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            it's chink wordplay. I think it's to do with both how a goose is called in their language along with a similar character in how they spell russia in chinkrunes.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I have an instinctual love for wordplay that stems from Chink/Jap runes looking kinda similar even though none of it makes a lick of sense to me until it's explained.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.whatsonweibo.com/why-russia-is-nicknamed-the-weak-goose-on-chinese-social-media/

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Chink for Russia sounds similar to Goose in chink.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Where's that "weak goose" graphic from China? Only saw it once, didn't have a chance to save.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      youre even more optimistic than the propaganda analyst on state tv. they should hire you!
      anyway, citation need to your claims

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia withdrew orderly like in Kharkiv

      I didn't know withdrawing in good order included leaving behind an entire divisions worth of tanks and other heavy equipment

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > AT LEAST 55k dead

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        in your digits
        twice

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >AT LEAST 55k dead Oinkranians.
      Source: My overstretched butthole.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Oh, suddenly you like twitter threads?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      OP seems to think twitter threads are fine as long as they are posted by Syrians, Armenians or tankies.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Unfortunately it is true. You guys made dozens of the Kherson collapse threads but it turns out ukros barely captured anything and what they did capture was in the northeast with no strategic significance.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The Blowbang video really made /misc/ mad, huh? They've come here to shill in greater numbers. That or there's some other hilarious disaster we're about to learn about.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah this time there will be bodies in a river rather than on a road. It's like a new level with a different environment. All this content, and it's not even DLC.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    they're retreating so their own forces don't get hit with the nuke.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >thinking that will help

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Well the 'retreat' in Kharkiv was literally abysmal. Leaving dozens of tanks, artillery, entire ammo depots and shit. So even just blowing up an ammo depot will be 'more organised'.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    never believed in a total collapse. always thought they would just shorten the perimeter. people make hasty exaggerations anytime ukraine is advancing anywhere. when they got to izyum some analysts said the war would be over in a matter of days kek

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    When you're invading, the general idea is to move forward, not backward, vatniks. This concept may be a little hard for you to understand though. Anyway, keep coping over territory losses, because they're going to accelerate.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Actually it's Ukraine invading Russia now.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Annexation moved to 2026.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    xaxaxaxaxa okrainian offensive already culminated *~~
    ukrops will never get cherson back *~~*~~*~~*~~*~~)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA BASED COMRADE. FRICK HOHOLPIGGES. OINK OINK OINK SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA BASED COMRADE. FRICK HOHOLPIGGES. OINK OINK OINK SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

        russia is here to stay forever in cherson *~~

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Indeed comrade. Long live Russia!

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          like they were there to stay forever in kharkiv oblast right vatBlack person dumbfrick?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            okrons still havent captured 1 large city and never will, ukronazis biggest achievements will remain villages that nobody cares about and a couple mid sized towns like lyman at best. kherson is russia forever

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous
            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              how many major cities has HIV-stan has captured?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              What, like Sumy and Kharkiv and Chernihiv?
              Tell me what happened to the Russian control of those cities.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >"russia is here to stay forever in cherson *~~"
          Welll, their corpses will forever fertilize the sunflower and melon fields.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Without X or without you?
            Uhhhhh ... that doesn't really make sense, does it? Like, the implication is that being "without [R*ssians]" (i.e. resisting) means being "without X" (since X gets turned off/blockaded/bombed to shit/whatever), right?

            Like, I get what it is MEANT here, namely
            >Living with the basic necessities but under R*ssia's thumb
            or
            >Living WITHOUT the basic necessities but also NOT under R*ssia's thumb
            but as written it kinda says the opposite, does it not?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              The original speech was in Ukranian and probably sounds more mellifluous, eloquent and poetic in its original language.
              Translating it into English probably lost some of the "feel".

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Frick the "feel", it straight-up doesn't work in this translation.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ukrainians (and NAFO trannies) STILL not realizing that war is only about to begin and everything up to this very point was just a set up.
    few days and russians will come in, guns blazing, retake the land, roast the pig, seethe the trannies and win.
    screencap this, seethe and dilate.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Are the 99th layer of gloves coming off?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      have a nice day vatnik

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        eek ouch. i didnt see the extended version of this. homie still alive

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        War is hell

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Why is he just lying out there? Already injured?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          he got blown up by a grenade previously, then finished with another

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Ah, well I suppose sort of putting him out of his misery, well I guess not quite that quickly. Not sure if they should have captured and treated him or given him a bullet for a quicker end instead.
            Well whatever, the Russians that don't surrender or flee have kind of signed their own death certificates. They can't pretend to think it's just an exercise anymore, that only worked in like the first week or two.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Waste of a grenade.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'm sure he was happy because he died fighting for putin.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        how the hell do you still manage to be alive after being directly hit like that

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          just seconds.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Frick never saw he was still conscious after that, hope the poor bastard bleed out quick.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Holy fricking shit the Yooks need to up the payload on those drone dropped shits, every single video I've seen has them leaving the Vatnik horribly mutilated but still alive.

        I know that's often the point of many munitions but with the absolute state of this war it's just animal cruelty at this point.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          their commercial chinesium drones don't have the capacity to carry that kind of payload. They have a smaller number of heavier ones that can, but those are still in short supply, albeit increasing in quantity slowly

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >it's just animal cruelty at this point.
          that's an insult to animals, comparing them to vatniks

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That's the point. Seeing the mutilated lower body of your Comrades makes you think twice of continuing the fight

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I think seeing things like this is bad for my mental health

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    _T__|_T_

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >t-this time it's "more strategic"
    kekw russoids are fricked

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Somewhere in Ukraine, Ukrainian anons from 2ch hunt down the 3-rd army corps.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >3-rd army corps.
      So not all of them died in Kupiansk

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nope. They were split and put in fragments on different parts of the frontline. So basically they no existent as a single unit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The rest died of old age.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Oh did did collapse, its just that other than in Balikliia, there was actually a logical retreat point other than the other side of a river or a border.

    The breakthrough in Kherson was, by all accounts, more devastating than the one at Balaklia, losing more ground, more troops, and more strategic positions than in Kharkiv. In hindsight it just looks better managed because they didn't immediately have to frick off from the entire region and regroup to a location with basically no northern defenses because a consistent theme of these breakthroughs has been that Russia assumes that they would never be on the defence and as such did not make additional defensive lines.

    Eventually the compressing waves of retreating frickers became thick enough that they essentially had undergone a de-facto regrouping effort, but their newly established lines aren't exactly made for all-out war duty, so don't expect them to last particularly long.

    As for Ukraine, well, optimism is the bane of good planning so it is very likely that, well, Ukraine simply did not expect quite such a massive exploitation opportunity and simply couldn't exploit further without wearing themselves thin, so they consolidated their gains and are now laying the ground work for round 2.

    Once Mylove falls, its over; the primary supply and repair point for the Russians will be in HIMARS range and gets shit on

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >retreat
    >retreat more organized
    some explain the difference in the end result

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Less lend-lease for UAF from Russia

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They destroyed some ammunition(despite what anon claims Ukraine recovered stash of Krasnopol laser guided ammunition), and maybe recovered some vehicles, although scores of T-62M were left behind

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      an organized retreat is costly for the attacker as you go from defensive location to defensive location in theory wearing down the enemies. the effectiveness of this does rely on terrain and prepared defenses though.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why the FRICK do all vatBlack folk sound the sam

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    "A more strategic retreat" just means that only some of them are panicking and dropping all of their stuff before retreating.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Da, we destroyed over 500 Himars, killed over 150k holols and 50k Hato troops.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Someone make a new thread, some holy fricking kino just dropped. Russian oinker got plinked in the head defending his literal shithole and then him and his blowjob buddy that crawled between his legs got asploded!

    Rus si a! Rus si a!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/xx3878/ukrainian_soldiers_raided_the_russian_position/

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, the UKR troops are going to hang back, cut the head off the russian army before tromping in.
    It's almost like they think before they act, based on prevailing conditions, instead of blindly charging in. Truly strange.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Russians seem to be convinced that Ukraine is still operating on their own dumbass deep strike stratagem that is essentially the military equivalent of "Throw everything at the wall and see what sticks and hope your enemy as dumb as you" which cost them the first stage of the war.

      Instead Ukraine has been operating on a careful rythm of several weeks of shaping, fixing and logistical bombardments paired with constant intelligence gathering, before carrying out a single focused breakthrough effort and then capitalizing on enemy retreats and basically regrouping and reestablishing the line once they run into a door they can't just kick in. Then its rinse and repeat.

      All of this is done while purposely ignoring enemy strong holds entirely, prefering to put the enemy in a situation where they can only flee while leaving massive amount of supplies.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'm looking at the current Kherson map. I'm not a military strategist, but what I see is:
        > Russians surrounded on 3 sides with river at back, all bridges destroyed.
        > Russians can only be supplied by air drop or boat, presume UKR would shoot down or sink anything that tries to reach them
        > Urban landscape favoring the defender
        > UKR with open supply lines to rear
        Assume the play here is to weaken what's left of russian forces before sallying forth. It's basically a siege. Assume that's what we're seeing now.
        Risk is russia getting organized in other regions, or a break through, so can't stay like this forever...

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I've seen some unconfirmed reports that ruskies have thrown the forces from Nova Kakhovka to reinforce the frontline near Berislav

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >2 weeks special needs operations
    >Dig trenches in Chernobyl
    >Kiev front collapses
    >3 months for mariupol, week one objective
    >Lose moska to a shitty drone
    >Three months of gains lost in a week
    >Kharkiv front collapses
    >Start mobilization, because we never lost most of the initial invading force and we don't need more men
    >We don't want nato to expand, sweden and finland join nato
    I can go on and on about puccia frick ups, and now we have to believe after all of this that they can hold kherson?

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    STOP BOMBING OUR BRIDGE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Ukies have started making a systemic advance
    >Vatniks have finally gotten their shit together to set up a proper defense in Kherson
    >Both sides expecting conflict very soon
    This is going to be an extremely /k/ino battle. Whatever happens here will decisively determine how the rest of the war goes. If Russians manage to fight off the Ukrainian attack, this will be a very long final push to get Russia out of their country. If Ukraine wins in short order, there is absolutely nothing Russia can do to win. This is the true assessment of the capability of both sides on somewhat equal ground.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Vatniks have finally gotten their shit together

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The best they can, at least. Kherson is probably the first defensive position Russians have fallen back to that is DEFINITELY properly fortified.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I've seen zero evidence of this, other than vatniks repeating it ad-nauseaum. It seems they're cornered there and cutoff from supplies and reinforcements, with no hopes of air or any kind of support.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >DEFINITELY properly fortified
          and in the range of uke arty, with no hope of resupply or further retreat. seems like a perfectly prepared defensive position, vatnik style.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Kherson will forever remain Russian.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      same energy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Russians will forever stay in Herson.
      In Hersons soil.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Next year's watermelon harvest is going to be amazing

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, but the Ukies won't be able to eat the aidsmelons for fear of getting of AIDS.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Elite soldiers are more dangerous

    Shock of shock! But they're still gonna die.

    One Russian tank was crewed by a Seperatist, a Wagner, and a VDV.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >All these pro-Russian posts

    Still pissed you lost a TON of Generals quite recently in a HOTEL?

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I hope russian shill posters are found and hanged or their hair cut off and the letter z cut into their foreheads

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Probably because the last half decent russian troops are there

    Part of the reason why Kharkov collapsed was because the troops there were badly trained conscripts

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No because I said it seemed like this time they were doing an actual organized withdrawal, even if there seemed to be some confusion among the Russian forces in the beginning. It made sense to withdraw, and it even seems like they remembered to keep some distance between the front and Nova Kakhova in order to keep the arty at bay or give themselves some depth in case the Ukrainians hit them too soon after.
    It's just a shame that the Arty is probably still able to hit them, just with a bit less accuracy as the Ukrainian drone spotters haven't moved in yet.

    UA OpSec keeps us from really knowing how far they've advanced into this gap, but I'd guess like in every other advance they made they're being cautious, looking out for minefields or straggler units and establishing defenses to fall back to in the unlikely case of counter attack.

    People are right for taking the piss out of the actual dozen or so "collapse" threads that were being made before the previous one even archived, that was kinda dumb. Next time, wait a little bit and don't get too over-eager. It's painful to wait for actual news but that's just how war is when one side is practicing good opsec and the other is literally spewing bullshit to obfuscate what's going on.

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ugly as sin
    shouldn't the only reason why women reporters are hired be that they are eye-candy?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If she's embedded with Vatniks she needs to be ugly otherwise she'd be subjected to rape twenty-four hours a day seven days a week overseen and indeed joined-in on by the officers.

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >apologize

    i mean is anyone around here delusional enough to think that when the reinforcement arrive that ukraine will halt their advances?

    its a basic trained at most 300k men like it or not they will make a huge difference against soldiers that are fighting for months and are basicly out of energy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      but based moron, they haven't been fighting continuously for seven months, there's been lots of rotating in and out of troops.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        take it from someone that was moronic enough to go to afganistan
        i learned quite a lot about my problems there
        it doesnt matter one bit if they fight 24/7 or not
        due to the nature of the situation your body adapts your sensory inputs accordingly
        specifically your smell changes to accomodate for the danger you are facing
        your eyesight and touch gets heywire apparently because your subconsioucs think that you are in such a danger that you might actually lose one or two so it keeps them on alert 24/7
        you also start having light sleeps because your hearing adapts in order to wake you up faster
        all of that (which isnt normal) messes up your circadian rhythm so badly that you dont even realise it (u.s veterans are a prime example) and there is only one way to fix it
        you need to spend 1-2 months near or in nature in order for your body to revert back to its synchronicity with the universe
        hence why rotating every few months or weeks isnt really enough and it will be evident once the reinforcements arrive because those people arent fighting for MoThEr ruSSia but for their lives which is equally as dangerous

        ukraine currently has 1 million people in active combat against 80k (i think roughly from the initial push left) russians to me the amount of area they took back considering the huge manpower advantage is laughable i just hope their overconfidence and their bullshit media wont get bitten back

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ah yes, the impressive organized retreat of the Russians will prove to be very effective.

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You Fricking Ukranian Bandits and Whelp! They Fricking Tricked you Suckas!

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Are we surprised the Russian army is getting better at running away with all the practice they've gotten?

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how come ukranians are still advancing despite horrific casualties, zisters whats going on?

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >a-at least it's not a full rout this time!!
    lol

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Slow collapse is still a collapse.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *