Kherson cut off!

Apparently the bridge at the dam in Nova Khakolvka is now closed. How does that play for the 25000 Russian troops on the west bank of the river and their supplies?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    two more offensives

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This time they're cut off for sure. Offensive in two days. Trust me brost.

      https://i.imgur.com/CzKVLco.jpg

      Behold.. the mighty counter-offensive in kherson.

      slava pisskraini!!! two more potholes!

      https://i.imgur.com/yRRxesZ.jpg

      But HIMARS cant destroy a modern bridge :/
      Did they plant the explosives by engineers?

      No biggie, we can still use ferries and pontoons

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      where is... any russian offensive? come on, they're the invaders. where are the offensives?

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    DAM'S CLOSED

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Underrated

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Due to AIDS

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        damnit you beat me to it anon

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Due to AIDS

      Bobba

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'm glad theres at least one person who remembers the old memes

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'm one of the oldest gays around, and I approve of this repurposed meme.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They could always leave their heavy equipment behind and cross over (in one way or the other)

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Please be real I wanna see Russians get sieged by HIMARS

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Please be real
      As real as the Herson offensive 🙂

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    https://liveuamap.com/en/2022/12-august-aerial-alert-and-explosions-reported-in-nova-kakhovka

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      WEBM of the video from the Telegram link used as the source for that news.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Imagine having the cauldron closed around you by Reddit.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The cauldron was bound to be memed into existence sooner or later

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Vatniks try to meme summon a cauldron
        >Its the ukies that do the cauldron
        >Vatniks meme about destroying ukie airforce and air defense two times over
        >Radars start to eat HARMS bolted on to soviet era planes
        >Vatniks meme about the kyiv faint
        >Ukies pull a retreat-arty-rushback faint
        >Vatniks meme about destroying ukie logistics
        >Ukies give HIMARS crews meth for sleep deprivation and tell them to hit every ammo depot within range

        If anything, the vatniks should not frick with meme magic if they want to show herr monke some results

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's over

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This time they're cut off for sure. Offensive in two days. Trust me brost.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Behold.. the mighty counter-offensive in kherson.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      slava pisskraini!!! two more potholes!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/yRRxesZ.jpg

        But HIMARS cant destroy a modern bridge :/
        Did they plant the explosives by engineers?

        It's ok vatBlack folk. no amount of seething will bring the bridges back or make the supply situation for Russian troops any better. Just sit back and enjoy the show.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      At this rate any counter-offensive sounds like a meme. What seems to be going on is that the Ukrainians like where their positions are around Kherson and they like that Moscow can't help but send more shit and people to blow up.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The only guys talking about the counter offensive were vatniks and they seem to be willing it into reality like they did with the cauldron.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Does lying help you /k/ope that much?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            wipe your tears olga

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >More /k/ope

              It's kind of embarrassing at this point man.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >It's kind of embarrassing at this point man

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >reddit spacing
                >talking about embarrassing
                wew

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Cry more 🙂

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                people who defend nation states for free are the only ones who can cry, here

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >no u
                wipe em

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                nice of them to photoshop masks on to show their support for the "mask agenda" /misc/ whines about incessantly

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >the "mask agenda" /misc/ whines about incessantly
                It's hilarious, because the glavset only pushes anti-mask and antivax bullshit abroad. Domestically in Russia, they have regular ass mask and vaccination campaigns.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I actually only just learned today that the picture of the superheroes bowing to the doctors that all the antivax types like to use to own the libs was put out by Moscow's city government lol

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Any proof of that. I have no reason to believe or doubt it, I just want to know if it's true.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/superheroes-bowing
                >On April 20th, 2020, amid the 2019-2020 coronavirus pandemic, the official Telegram channel for the Department of Transport of Moscow posted two versions of an artwork by an unknown author in which DC and Marvel superheroes bow to a group of masked medics walking through a hospital hall (shown below, left and right).
                >On the same day, Russian news website DTF reposted one of the artworks.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Thanks. I'll have to look a bit deeper into it to make sure it's genuine, but it would certainly make a lot of sense.

                https://i.imgur.com/4vEJxP1.jpg

                They hit everything they aimed at.

                Pick up my hat.

                Oh, come on, buddy. I'm clearly shitposting here. I like dead Russians as much as every other sane person.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >clearly shitposting
                Reread my post, in context, and understand it is also a shitpost. We're on the same page here.

                But, literally, a vatnik was unironically posting pretty much the same thing you did in another thread: "Look at those dispersed craters!
                Only three, and they missed everything!" Fun clown show.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Well, frick you.
                No wait, high five?
                Whatever, let's celebrate dead Russians together.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Well, frick you too. And, Cheers! I'm fairly certain a vatnik died miserably somewhere in Ukraine during this exchange. Every little bit helps.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Cheers, buddy.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I suppose the irony is that the Russian government, which obviously includes Putin, is pro-vaccine, while the majority of the Russian population is anti-vaccine.
                That said, I'm somewhere in the middle. I'm unvaccinated, and don't really give a shit about whether or not people decide to take it. I'm simply against vaccination passes and people being forced to take it.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I'm pretty centrist on it to be tbh. The benefits for middle aged and older seem convincing enough, but it gets more iffy for kids (last I checked the data anyway). Also, the new mRNA technology probably warranted more initial caution and oversight/transparency than we got. Overall, the vaxmaxx/antivax dichotomy was just obnoxious and dysfunctional and neither side was without blame for causing it in my opinion.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                i shitpost at so-called vaccine skeptics a lot, but frankly i've seen an unusual number of strokes, blood clots and sudden death (because brain embolism) in family & family-friends. this is confounded by covid contributing to the likelihood of suffering these problems, but it's still concerning and i worry when i hear someone is going to have a third injection

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I'm the guy you're replying to, and my opinion is that it's probably the right decision for older people to take it. In my family, I think everyone except me has taken the vaccine, and several of them have gotten the coof, but didn't have any complications, and recovered without any trouble. That includes both my parents.
                I think I might have had the coof a few months ago, given that I was sick for a little under two weeks, after never having had a cold or a flu for ten years, but it wasn't anything serious. It was like a cold, and less serious than a regular flu.
                I dunno. I just don't like authoritarianism... you know, unless it's directed at Black folk, feminists and other far left scum.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >while the majority of the Russian population is anti-vaccine.
                This is a lie.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955973/
                It's very close to a majority.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It's just a guy with a helmet

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >spent tubes
                pi-do-rashka

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Problem? 🙂

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                do you have trouble reading english?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Nope 🙂

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                How romantic.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Cool sneakers, gayass.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Thanks bro 🙂

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                these aren't interesting pictures

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Making me cry here 🙁

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                There are many problems, because there are many orcs. The problems are decreasing steadily.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Animooted

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If the bridge is so fine, why don't they drive tanks across it?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Don't be so jealous of their accuracy.

      Also how are the ferries going vatnik

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      hohols are about ISIS tier in many ways. The US funding and weapons, the moronic terror attacks, getting BTFO ABY RUSSIA, the list goes on. Maybe they can enhance their imaginary counter offensive by destroying Lenin statues in towns they already control or behead someone for insulting bandera

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Source: krokodil stupor + MSPaint.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You can jump around death numbers, but control over territory is indisputable. Russia is unable to conduct a large-scale offensive operations, period.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >The vatnik terrorist cries out in pain as he blows up schools and maternity hospitals.
        Russians would have to spend a century being taught how to be civilized human beings before they were only as heinous as ISIS.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >$100,000 to make a little hole even a starving hohol can’t slip through
      HIMARS is a meme.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        If the bridge is fine, then why is it closed and Russia has built two ferry lines?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Because you touch yourself at night.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I accept your concession

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >xaxaxaxa dumb hohol bridge is fine
      >what? We use ferries now because WE WANT TO

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >11 hits in one spot, bridge still somewhat passable by small cars
      Damn. That weapon is exceptionally unsuited for this particular job. Each of these missiles could have been used to destroy a Russian artillery piece instead. It's not reassuring that they've committed themselves to trying to take down strategic infrastructure with inadequate tactical weapons. It takes a ton of precious GMLRS to even damage a bridge and then it's not impossible to repair it unless the piers are destroyed, and I've not seen any piers destroyed by GMLRS so far. Partisan posters are going to do their thing but I don't feel so optimistic about the Kherson situation right now.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >t. posting while using the ferry

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >kill 11 artillery pieces
        >cause every single vatnik artillery piece on the northern side of the river to suffer an ammo shortage

        Gee, what a hard choice to make.

        >precious GMLRS
        >precious

        It's ammo, you dumb shit. The mutts produce thousands of 'em each month. Ukies ain't gonna be running out anytime soon.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >cause every single vatnik artillery piece on the northern side of the river to suffer an ammo shortage
          That's what was supposed to happen in theory, it didn't work out in practice as well as expected so the offensive had to be either significantly postponed or called off completely.
          >The mutts produce thousands of 'em each month
          Literally no and I have the bills to prove it, you frothing at the mouth fanatic.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Literally no and I have the bills to prove it
            Your document literally states they do. Are you having brain problems, kacap? Are you crying right now?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Can you read? Max production capacity for 2023: 10,002. Army ordered 4,674 missiles and Marines 834 more.
              5,508/12= 459 missiles a month.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >By December 2021, 50,000 GMLRS rockets had been produced,[40] with yearly production then exceeding 9,000 rockets. Each rocket pod contains 6 identical rockets.
                >max production capacity is 10,002

                Not him, but this is a pointless nitpick. If burgers wanted to, they could easily make thousands each month, because the max capacity for peace time is more than 800 a month. What's more important now is how many do burgers have total right now considering 50,000 have been produced so far. 40,000 precision missiles is more than enough, because they can actually hit their targets. 40,000 missiles = 40,000 less ammo depots and command centers for the vatniks.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                And supply trucks and trains. Little by little, the Russian invasion force is running out of supplies.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Mark Cancian from CSIS estimates about 20,000 rounds were expended in training and in war against the Islamic State.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              His documents says there's about 5.000 GMLRS produced each year.
              That's not thousands per month.
              That's not even one thousand per month.
              That's not even half of that, in fact.

              We know there's a bottleneck effect for the use of HIMARS because of ammunition.
              That's why the US also gave M777 which, while less effective, have plenty of ammo in storage.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Peacetime production is the same as war production
                Lol, if the US wants to mass supply these missiles, anon, they can.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >procurement quantity: 5.9k, 5.3k, 4.9k
            >in prior years: 50k
            Oh no no no no
            AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >it didn't work out in practice

            Except, you know, it did work out and is currently actively working out outside of your vatBlack person delusions.

        • 2 years ago
          Based Charlie Magne Poster

          >produce thousands of 'em each month
          i hate to be that guy, but you misspelled "hundreds"

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        If Kherson is liberated and 30,000 Vatasiatic soldiers get fricking rekt, my sides will accelerate to escape velocity.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          A trapped force in Kherson without supplies is fricked. Ukraine needs to strangle the garrison there.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          i imagine it would end the war on the spot, such loss can't be just shrugged off and even the most moronic of general public are going to notice that russia is fricking weak.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >i imagine it would end the war on the spot, such loss can't be just shrugged off and even the most moronic of general public are going to notice that russia is fricking weak.
            So you understand why Russia is diverting troops from LDPR of all places to Kherson, then, right?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              sure, but that might not be the best of ideas.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I think Ukraine can win Kherson provided it fights dirty as frick. Keep the Russians cut off, strike their logistics, and blast them from afar. Also let the partisans keep on doing their thing.

            Assault the Russians without mercy, and give them as little chance to fight back as possible.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              > dirty as frick
              Ya mean smart?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Oh, and I just had a truly wicked idea. Ukraine should set up loudspeakers and blare patriotic music at deafening levels at night. Rob the occupiers of SLEEP.

              > dirty as frick
              Ya mean smart?

              Of course it's smart. Fair fights are reserved for adversaries actually worthy of such treatment.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                All the Russians should hear, every single night, is the Ukrainian National Anthem ringing in their ears.

                [...]
                If you can force a surrender or a withdrawal-sans-equipment in this manner it's manifestly the smarter way to do things. Less damage to your own shit, your troops remain fresher for necessary pitched battles, and you're not answerable to anything partisans do to invaders they capture. "Starve the beast" is a good route if they can't defend their logistics well enough.

                I agree. "Anaconda Plan" their asses.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Buy a bunch of cheap eletric helo drones or quads and make them do autonomous missions over the russian positions while blaring meme music

                >be orc
                >sleep in your radioactive trench
                >hear carameldansen in the distance
                >every time you hear that arty starts raining

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Sounds fun. Wear the Russians down with simple sleep deprivation.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Minasaaan
                >Genki, tbh ka!
                https://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/mikomiko

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              > dirty as frick
              Ya mean smart?

              If you can force a surrender or a withdrawal-sans-equipment in this manner it's manifestly the smarter way to do things. Less damage to your own shit, your troops remain fresher for necessary pitched battles, and you're not answerable to anything partisans do to invaders they capture. "Starve the beast" is a good route if they can't defend their logistics well enough.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              "Dirty as frick" would be poisoning wells and mass bombing any place Russian soldiers are at, no matter civilians. What you propose is the best way to win that fight.
              Idk about troops Ukraine has in Zaporizhia but swinging through Melitopol to Nova Kakhovka from south would be most hilarious disaster for Russia

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Well people have been poisoning the Russians' food. Though personally I'd go after their precious alcohol.

                Also the partisans should pour BLEACH in the enemy's gas tanks. Ruin the vehicles.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It's a simple way for Ukrianian partisans to frick up the Russians' best laid plans.

                Keep seething Vatnik.
                My only question is are any of the heavy equipment you're going to abandon in Kherson going to be usable by the Ukrainians. It seems they always come down with a nasty case fo explosions.

                I imagine at the minimum, the Ukrainians will be able to salvage working parts even from wrecked Russian vehicles.

                https://vehiclefreak.com/bleach-in-gas-tank-what-happens-to-the-engine/

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >can't be just shrugged off and even the most moronic of general public
            you underestimate how fricking moronic vatBlack folk are.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        No, the bridge is basically impassable for any large supplies or heavy vehicles. That’s some serious structural damage that will need repair work, you’re not moving armor over that.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Damn, I guess I'm gonna have to call my congressman and tell him to send Ukraine a few GBU-43/B MOABs.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Those are entrance wounds not exit wounds. morons who don't know how bridges work think them minor.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Look underneath 🙂

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      slava pisskraini!!! two more potholes!

      https://i.imgur.com/yRRxesZ.jpg

      But HIMARS cant destroy a modern bridge :/
      Did they plant the explosives by engineers?

      I reckon some of the pre/post stressed cables are fricked so most of the damage to the bridge's strength is invisible. Needless to say, simply laying a couple girders over the potholes won't fix that.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I wouldn't drive a tank over that.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    How many weeks worth of supplies do you guys think the russians in Kherson have if they can't be resupplied via road or air? My guess is two, maybe three if they really stretch it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They will get supplied by helicopters and river ferries. It just complicates their supply situation and together with HIMARS taking care of their ammo depot they won't have that much ammo. Russia is heavily dependent on heavy fire power and without they are vulnerable. You can tell by all the vatBlack folk ITT getting nervous.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        gee I wonder if those ferries and helis will be targeted or something

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Piggies wouldn't dare shoot down a Russian helicopter, and haven't.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The eyebrow is being raised

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      P.S. If you mean food by supplies, yes for weeks, if you mean ammo and fuel, I doubt they have 3 days worth stored west of the river, they go through hundreds of tons each day.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They won't run out, but supplies will get lower and their fighting power will follow.

      If you take artillery for example, they can move some rounds, will have some supplies, but they won't be able to barrage whatever they want because that'll require too many shells. They'll have to be more picky as to when they fire, do without when possible and so on.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They can likely loot enough food from farmers to get by for months, ammo on the other hand is going to become as issue. That said if this is legit I'm sure Russia will be willing to risk a few Mi-8s to keep them supplied.
      What will be interesting is if Russia will make any attempt to pull them back or not, they might fall for the "they fight harder with their backs to the wall" meme and get mass surrenders.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You're expecting upto 30,000 men to survive by pilfering from farms, in a war zone, that have probably not been active for months. Your expectation is that 30,000 men can survive, essentially, on a hunter-gatherer lifestyle and remain combat effective.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >pilfering from farms
          Have you seen the lines of trucks stealing Ukrainian grain? I'm not saying they are going to be having fun but they could stay alive.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >lines of trucks stealing Ukrainian grain
            That isn't being eaten by any Russians. It's being loaded onto ships and sold to countries desperate enough to do business with Russia.

            By the way, looting during war time is a war crime. Especially if the attacking/occupying force is methodically conducting the looting for the profit of their state.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Those ships carrying stolen Ukrainian grain should be seized and their crews tried as fricking pirates.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yes. We may yet see that, too. All cargo ships are subject to search and audit. There has already been talk of a coordinated worldwide effort to track looting and sales of stolen goods. There are few routes or ports available where Russia can completely avoid such scrutiny.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    But HIMARS cant destroy a modern bridge :/
    Did they plant the explosives by engineers?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Shit's fubar isn't it?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Do you see a long line of cars driving over it? This boy is done.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        As a bridge engineer, I would say it is still fine for car and small trucks. Definitely not for heavy equipment like tanks.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          All those weapons.....ripe for Ukraine's eventual capture and "repurposing".

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That's old vatnik drone video. Needs update.

        In case of Nova Khakolvka i'm more curious about Ukraines ability to overflow the dam (and potentially some Crimea lowlands using the feed channel) by emptying the HPP upstream. Could they wash out a a bombed section like that? What would be the consequences?

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    holy shit vatBlack folk are seething ITT

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      When aren't they?

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No biggie, we can still use ferries and pontoons

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >aaaah i'm pontooning!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      NO, GOSPODIN! NOT THE PONTOONS AGAIN!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >pontoons

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        god i wish there was a video footage of the entirety of the strike.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Who knows what things will come out in the future.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Kherson is obsolete, so it's okay if we lose it. It will only make room from brand new cities.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Kherson is obsolete
        It's the road to Odessa Vatnik. Not that you would be able to take it but still.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Odessa? No such city exists, hohol homosexual. It is fake, lie of troony propaganda artisans and child rapistries.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >child rapistries
            Didn't know the Kremlin shilled against itself

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I'm playing 28D Trans-Siberian checkers, senpai.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          what is odessa?
          if you look at map of the ukraine there is no odessa in the ukraine

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >No biggie, we can still use ferries and pontoons
      t. pontoooooner

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/GPshXAu.jpg

      >pontoons

      >Water: the vatnik's natural enemy.
      Yup. Dis gunn'a end just ssooooo weellllll. Can't wait.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    At this point, the "Kherson offensive" is clearly a psyop that nobody's buying.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It forced Russian to move 30 BTG from Donbass and Izium to this area and now they have real hard time suppling them. Offensive will begin soon.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I guess thats then why Russia moved 15K reinforcements into Kherson. Any why would Ukraine even try to attack before thy have cut the supply lines? That would be pretty stupid, better first to kill the bridges, destroy the air bases in crimea and set the stage right.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Hohols will unironically retake Kherson by the end of the year. Btw, I am dead serious.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe? Assuming that they even can, I have to wonder that if the Ukrainians can stand to wait, that dragging out the standoff around Kherson as long as possible isn't just the better option.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    All those "two more offensives" posts lol
    It's like they forgot what Russia's original plan was and an Ukranian counter offensive in any capacity wasn't part of it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I wanted to say they've been shifting the goalposts the whole war, but I think they got so lost in their moronic narrative that their main concern is proving Ukrainian claims wrong. Turns out they happily shifted from real victories to twitter victories and don't see the problem.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What makes you think russia has no "real" victories when they keep taking chunks of ukraine that they're unable to reclaim.
        how long have donetsk and lugansk been "separatists" now?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >that they're unable to reclaim
          Yet.
          >how long have donetsk and lugansk been "separatists"
          Far too long.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >how long have donetsk and lugansk been "separatists" now?

          Not for long if Vatniks will keep depopulating these regions from it inhabitants and use them as cannon fodder. Soon there wont me anyone to sustain even ilussion of separatist movement.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Which will be a bad thing for the Russians. They'll be forced to lock a ton of occupation troops into those areas, lol.

            >no advance
            Meanwhile Pisky almost entirely cleared, fighting in Soledar, Artemovsk, etc. etc.

            Going on the attack while your logistics are being destroyed isn't wise, lol.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >your logistics are being destroyed
              Which they aren't. Otherwise they wouldn't still be taking shit.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Is that why you moved your ammo depots far back, stretching your supply lines?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Non-zog source on that?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >they are winning the arty war
                Source?

                >the Ukrainians are winning The Logistics War.
                Evidence?

                So...you have no evidence

                literally the PROOFS meme, even when given source lmao

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                God you're dumb.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >keep taking
          They haven't for quite some time now you massive moron. Russia went from fast advance, to slow advance, to no advance. Now you're acting smug because they aren't losing territory.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >no advance
            Meanwhile Pisky almost entirely cleared, fighting in Soledar, Artemovsk, etc. etc.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Pisky
              A village on the pre-february between Ukraine and Donbabwe.
              Weird flex.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Hey man. Gotta fight those windmills.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                And what else would they be taking if not the stuff at the frontlines? What the frick are you even saying?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >6 months later
                >taking a town less than 1km from Donetsk Airport
                >acting like this is impressive.
                You morons really are pathetic.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >acting like this is impressive
                Your strawmanning is moronic, but I guess it's fitting since you're a moronic shill.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >strawman
                >claims almost taking Pisky is a sign of how much Russia is advancing
                >Pisky is less than 500m from the initial line of contact
                >The mighty Russian advance moved almost 500m in 6 months.
                Where is the strawman?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >they're not advancing
                >actually the newest advances are here and here
                >HURRRR DURRRR!

                Yeah.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Congratulations on advancing 500 meters away from your border after six months, I guess

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I love it. Russia can't conquer a country after 6 months of fighting, right on its BORDER.

                That's how SORRY Russian's Logistics are.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >6 months into a 48h special COPEration

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I honestly can't figure out if you're mentally ill or a five year old with a lobotomy. I suppose it's probably both, with a heavy note of regular krokodil abuse.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >doesn't know what the word "strawman" means
                >misuses it with broken ESL anyway
                If you can read, this should help out:

                [...]

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Let me help you there.
                >a weak or imaginary opposition (such as an argument or adversary) set up only to be easily confuted

                Which is what was being done. I know you hohloshills are dumb, but come on now.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Don't link to that homosexual commie board.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Meanwhile Pisky almost entirely cleared
              That village is 3km in length, "almost entirely cleared" means you captured 900 METERS IN SIX MONTH
              >fighting in Soledar, Artemovsk, etc. etc.
              Very fantom fights, in a week we will learn Russia didn't yet reach them like it happened with Siversk lmao

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >in a week we will learn Russia didn't yet reach
                You're mistaking Russia for Okraina 🙂


            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Pisky almost entirely cleared
              Pounded a village of a couple thousand people into burning rubble, because shelling civilians is easy when they can't fight back.

              Also in the news, vatniks stomped an entire barnyard of baby chicks into paste out of frustrated rage that they're getting their shit pushed in.

              Rossiya so stronk.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >how long have donetsk and lugansk been "separatists" now?
          Since 2014 when Russia sent in its first waves of Little Green Men taking "vacation" time from their duty stations in the Russian military.

          Glad I could clear that up for you.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      when are you guys retaking Donetsk, Lugansk, The Crimean, Kherson or any of the nuclear plants?
      you guys talk a big game but keep losing your country slice by slice. are you guys going to counter-invade the russian mainland anytime soon?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        When are you going to take Kiev, Kharkiv, and Odessa?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >retreats from Kiev, Kharkiv, Sumy, Chernihiv and the entire north
        ok

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Russians cannot hold shit if their logistical systems are wrecked.

        Ukraine needs to continue to strike the underbelly of the Russian military beast until the intestines spill out.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        > when are you guys retaking any of the nuclear plants?
        Why plural if you only control one of those?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          it's a way of coping, you weren't supposed to notice that

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I always feel happy when I see mention of nuclear plants under construction. Gives me some hope.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            L C O E

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        > sneakily attacks a child five times weaker than him from behind and beats him to a pulp
        > somehow the kid still finds the strength to get to his feet, block the blows, and even throw back lunges
        > squeals that until the kid knocks him out, all the punches don't count

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Shut the frick up putinshills, you make me disgusted

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >le pothole maymay
    Okay, go drive a tank over it then

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Like the Russians probably drove a tank over the cardboard box where your family lived in ww2

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >bridge is fine comrade, no worries
      >*closes bridge and uses ferries instead*
      It's russian 5D chess again

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Friend is an architect and he said you could probably drive a tank over it.... for a time. He said it could last one pass or twenty. But he said that it isn't a simple fix with concrete. That would make it okay for civilian cars to go on, slowly, with gaps in between, but not military stuff (again you COULD but it won't be 100%).

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You can't fix prestressed concrete. If they missed all the support beams you could put steel plates over the hole and it'd hold. If they hit something important it might hold one tank or 20, but when it's gonna give it's just gonna give, without any real warning to it

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    frick off concern troll

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Frick off one-note shill.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    A 5 month old image from when you thought Russia would still win is all you have, cope.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Even though I feel it's highly unlikely, I would laugh myself to death if Russia actually falls for a feint and then gets cauldrooned.

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    how many troops are left north of the river? Probably fewer than there were when they started shelling the bridges. The ones left are lambs for the slaughter.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      There was 10k troops before on the northern bank, now there are 25k because Russia pulled in reinforcements. Thats what so funny about it.

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why don’t the HIMARS detonate when hitting a bridge? Are the fuses not sensitive enough to trigger going through a thin layer of concrete? Do they just go straight into the water as duds?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's made to penetrate it's target before it explodes.
      So yeah, HIMARS is not usefull for this kind of target.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It seems to have done the job beautifully. Damaged the bridge just enough so only civilian vehicles can drive over. Force the forces there to either flee and leave their equipment or get fricked.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      videos from the bridge showed they penetrated alright and hit the spans below the concrete and cut part of the tensioning cables. now that bridge is a pre tensioned concrete bridge and with the tension cables damaged it has become unsafe to use. And thats why Russia ae forced to use ferries and are short on supplies. Cool, isn't it?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This is why Russia is going to get buttfricked into oblivion during WW3. They're sending the best shills they've got to this board to try and argue with us... And your average fricking nerd ass /k/ommando can explain, succinctly, the logic and rationale of a particular use of force.

      • 2 years ago
        Based Charlie Magne Poster

        >videos from the bridge
        different bridge numbnuts. do all bridge rook arike to you hohols or are you literally and unironically moronic?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, about that bridge....

          • 2 years ago
            Based Charlie Magne Poster

            >oh no the inhumanity the civilians are having to take the heckin ferry
            meanwhile the bridge is exclusively for the use of the military. enjoy watching your pork stuffed meat puppets getting shredded, hohol.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >meanwhile the bridge is exclusively for the use of the military
              You're dumber than shit, literally. Russian military is using a designated ferry for over a week now. Luckily you're a name gay, so it is easy to filter you for good. bye.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              yo, fakemagne. how come you went so quiet after this post:

              https://i.imgur.com/ElaTw1z.jpg

              >meanwhile the bridge is exclusively for the use of the military
              You're dumber than shit, literally. Russian military is using a designated ferry for over a week now. Luckily you're a name gay, so it is easy to filter you for good. bye.

              ?
              what's the deal with that? you're not insane and full of denial are you?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/g5PJu9O.jpg

            >muh bridge totally ok
            >HIMARS totally doesn't work

            I wonder how many tanks each of those barges can hump across the river at a time. Looks like it could be hundreds. Ukies better surrender before they arrive.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The potholes aren't the real damage, the real damage is the HIMARS blowing up UNDER the bridge and destroying all of the supports and cables. That's what vatniks and /chug/ fail to understand

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The HIMARS rockets blowing up under the bridge*

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >muh bridge totally ok
    >HIMARS totally doesn't work

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >They have to ferry motorbikes.
      Bridge can totally handle a few columns of tanks and other heavy equipment. It's all a feint.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      would be just horrible if a drone attacked that

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      imagine a artillery round striking that in the middle.

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Nice.

    NOW, Wipe out ALL Logistics of the Vatniks in and around Kherson.

    No supplies must be allowed to reach them.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Run in fear! It's over!

    The Russians have.....WOOD!

    https://news.yahoo.com/russian-forces-kherson-protecting-themselves-154000838.html

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >"I came to Kherson and all I got was wood."

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Post-script: pretty sure those shoes are NOT regulation.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >footwraps are superior to boots

        why do we listen to vatnik cope

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Because it's funny.

          Ah Russia, a military so advanced it's reduced to wearing fricking sneakers.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            That's so they can sneak behind the enemy in covert operations, you dumb shill.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Shoigu opened up his private stockpile... it's over.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        how do you actually defeat Shoigu's special hardwood armor?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The smooker will take care of it.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Hire an Ottoman retail associate who used to be an Eagle Scout. He'll have a merit badge in wholesale slaughter.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      And what's the issue?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >shoigu's private reserve

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >They didn't leave a single bridge intact with massive blocks of C4 on the structure
    FRICK

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >A majority of Russian's Ukraine is now trapped in Kherson.
    >Trump is now going to be indited under the fricking Espionage Act.
    STOP STOP, my penis can only get so erect from today's news!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you need to go back

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Keep seething Vatnik.
        My only question is are any of the heavy equipment you're going to abandon in Kherson going to be usable by the Ukrainians. It seems they always come down with a nasty case fo explosions.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >TFW today's news gives you the soundbite

      https://www.youtube.com/shorts/sCb_lJ6yJHY

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >indited
      ESL D&C DO NOT RESPOND

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        SBU didn't bring their best. Because the best are already dead.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >indicted
        Oh no a typo.
        Doesn't change the fact that the enemies of America got a double dose of really bad news.

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't Kherson still filled with civilians in the residential areas?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Are you telling me the Vatinks will take civilians as hostages and use them as human shield? Or indiscriminately massacre them? Stuff they always do?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's okay, it's just hohols 🙂

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Partisans will get the perpetrators' names.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Are you telling me the Vatinks will take civilians as hostages and use them as human shield?
        They are already doing that by occupying residences and the whole place overall to prevent UAF artillery from blowing them up on the spot. No need to wait for urban warfare.

        >Or indiscriminately massacre them? Stuff they always do?
        Russians will take all of the food and water that the civilians might still have stored and then have them for dinner before Ukrainians can move in and do anything about it.
        Russians already meme Ukrainians as pigs and non-humans. Actually acting on these beliefs is just the natural step on their deevolution.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That's why they haven't completely destroyed the bridges

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I doubt theres going to be an offensive there, Russians forcefully drafted thousands of locals to reinforce their depleted units, and Ukrainians dont want to kill their own. They will probably just negotiate for the release of the drafted locals in exchange for free passage. This also protects them from local insurgents, they're not going to start blowing up random Russians knowing it could be one their neighbors who was forced to serve at gunpoint.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The Ukrainians can simply trap the Russians in Kherson, preventing them from escaping or being resupplied.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Sure thing, they're just gonna talk it trough.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ISIS did similar things in Syria and successfully used the hostages to evacuate their troops from encircled positions.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Russians are welcome to leave Kherson.....WITHOUT their weaponry. All that shit they brought? That belongs to Ukraine now.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            lol

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              pidorashka *~~

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Russians forcefully drafted thousands of locals to reinforce their depleted units
      Russians have to moronic to do that
      Locals who get drafted have to be moronic to go through that

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Conscripted locals than start firing on the Russians the moment the Ukrainians move in,

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, I saw on here a while ago. Pro-Ukranians reported it as a simple hostage situation, while pro-Russians reported it as local volunteers signing up (which is obvious bs) my guess is they're not given access to any weapons or ammunition and their family is held hostage too. The numbers vary but it seems the Russians replaced between 3k and 8k casualties this way. This helps free up Russian non combat personnel for frontline duty. I also read that Russians are doing similar things in melitopol.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Most likely Vatniks resolved to take theor families as hostages. Kherson is one of the most pro Ukraine regions and people there hate Russians. Vatniks are playing with fire and I hope they fricking burn to cinders in it.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Kherson had some pro Russian morons though. If you want to see pro ukraine you are talking about Lviv. They could drink Russian blood

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Wait wait. Are you telling me that those 30 TBG sent to reinforce and fortify in Kherson to stop Ukraine advance are now cut off from supplies and only way for these Vatniks to get out of to abandon all that heavy equipment they brought?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Correct. Russians are stupid.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Holly damn. Ukies pulled out actually genius feint. And Vatniks swallowed bait, hook, line sinker and rood. Now other places are less protected.

        And loss of the airfield cut any air support capabilities by half in that region.

        Massive respect to Holols.

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    And what are you going to do if it turns out they're not cut off, not out of ammo, and the Kherson counteroffensive cauldron isn't happening?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      what kind of a dumb question is that? Either they're cut off or not. For now it seems that they are, since they have no functional bridge left.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They'll memoryhole it. Just like all the other inconvenient shit.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's also entirely possibly they will evolve wings and wipe out all of Ukraine from the air. Anything could happen. Vatnik krokodil hallucinations are a rich source of alternative realities that continue to surprise and amaze.

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ned to stop sending so much materiel.

    Russia needs to be flayed over a long period of time. Can't end the war too quickly.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Thats what the US is doing.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It won't. Putin is too stubborn and stupid to recognize reality.

      We could RAMP UP support for Ukraine and the stupid Russians would STILL bum-rush in.

  34. 2 years ago
    Based Charlie Magne Poster

    >bridge at the dam in Nova Khakolvka is now closed
    for an hour or so. that bridge is only 15m long, it doesn't need much to fix it
    >inb4 but muh pretensioned cables
    fifteen
    meters
    you can safely span that with some steel beams.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Another fake "Based Charlie Magne Poster"

      Vatniks, it's so cute I live rent-free in your heads.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        qrd?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Sure it's easy to fix...when you're not at risk of another artillery strike.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Black person ukries can send a rocket or two every night there, just to send the message. And US will supply more

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >it doesn't need much to fix it
      >you can safely span that with some steel beams
      The rockets probably fricked up the cables in the prestressed concrete. That's not something you fix and it makes the bridge effectively useless depending on how many of the cables got and will get fricked.

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder what they're actually planning to do. Based on the western articles I can find, Ukraine has no immediate plans to retake Kherson, because they lack the conventional weaponry required for an offensive. It's not specified what this is referring to, but I'm assuming they mean tanks and IFVs, and to a lesser extent, various forms of artillery and air support.
    With the extensive fog of war, it's hard to know what's going on at all, and whether something is a feint (heh) or simply deliberate disinformation. If they've actually trapped the Russian homosexuals in Kherson by blowing up the bridges, I genuinely wonder what their plans are, both in the short term and in the long term.

    Either way, it's going to be interesting to read about all of this shit after the war is over and done with, and just how much shit has been hidden from the general public.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >I wonder what they're actually planning to do
      Lure shitloads of Russian troops and armor in and over time destroy the bridges. No fuel etc for the Vatnik armor.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Hopefully.
        This whole war is giving me a big ol' revenge boner, and it just grows with every dead Russian.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Without fuel, that armor is just booty for Ukraine to take from Russia.

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >they still believe in the mythical "Kherson offensive"

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >he still believes in mythical "donbass offensive"

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They keep taking land tho, while "kherson offensive" has nothing

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Did they capture Pisky for the fifth time this week? Or maybe they took Siversk for 10th time?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >They keep taking land tho

          At slower pace than WW1. How did that work for Germans?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >"kherson offensive" has nothing
          Bilohirka, Lozove, Andriivka, Blahodatne... This is just what we know of that got through the media blackout on the Kherson front.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ukrainians would be complete morons to attack now and waste equipment when they are winning the arty war. Half a year of this shit and ruskis are completely fricked.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >they are winning the arty war
        Source?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Everything? Not one of the western systems was destroyed by russians yet. And they just lost a billion $ in aircraft.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Everything?
            What?
            >Not one of the western systems was destroyed by russians yet
            How can you know this?
            >And they just lost a billion $ in aircraft.
            Non-zog source?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Holy fricking cope ruskies are hilarious.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous
              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                They seem to have missed. Look at the craters. None of them hit the aircraft, which are all fully intact, if somewhat disassembled, which is entirely on purpose for maintenance reasons.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                They hit everything they aimed at.

                Pick up my hat.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >the Ukrainians are winning The Logistics War.
          Evidence?

          Twitter posts and youtubers. What do you mean that's not real proof? It says it right there vatnik!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        More critically, the Ukrainians are winning The Logistics War.

        Supplies flow to Ukraine. Russia is running out.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >the Ukrainians are winning The Logistics War.
          Evidence?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            post planes.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              So...you have no evidence

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                no, you don't have planes.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Are playing the reddit game with me, shill?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Here's a Russian ammo storage. Notice the lack of something?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Russians can only dream of such wealth.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >brand new pallets

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                American pallets seem weird
                EPAL master race i guess

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Pallets. God, Russia is pathetic. You'd think a nation with a frickton of TREES would have PALLETS.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/xSUJ0ND.jpg

                Here's a Russian ammo storage. Notice the lack of something?

                https://i.imgur.com/kBZazSR.jpg

                Russians can only dream of such wealth.

                If Ruskies used pallets, Russians would simply steal them and use them for firewood and bunkerage.
                Ukraine is like this too. There is no way that Russia or Ukraine can operate something like palletized cargo because nobody in Russia or Ukraine actually believes in their job.
                American black people however have absolutely no problem whatsoever being a backbone of the US Military logistics network.
                >Russians cannot have logistics like African-Americans administer in the US Army.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Ukraine is like this too.
                They're not, that's why they're wrecking their shit. The more the war progresses, the more the difference between both becomes evident. Ukraine is what Russia should aspire to become.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Shiogu needs those trees, they can't just use them for lowly things like pallets.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >putin huilo

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Is this crap still going?

    Who even gives a shit anymore

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Let me guess, not the first post by this IP

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You are bad at guessing

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Does this idea hold any promise?

    https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/ukraine-think-deep-attacks-against-russian-logistics

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      > The Ukrainians have the advantage, as Andrews’ Raiders did, of being able to pass for the enemy. Thus, it would be possible for Ukrainian Special Forces to take advantage of anonymity and attack several railroad chokepoints simultaneously, deep within Russia. If successful, such strikes would not only cause massive logistics problems that would multiply as summer faded and winter set in, but they also would create a huge propaganda shock that would hit Putin squarely in the groin.

      >The targets for such attacks are four railroad bridges, one in Voronezh one in Vologograd and two at the intersection of railways in Fokinsky Rayon.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I think the Ukrainians should fricking go for it. Hit the railroad bridges inside Russia.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I want her to step on my testicles

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They should, it would be funny to see the comando teams on TV denouncing Okraina after they get captured.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >hit Putin squarely in the groin
        I'd rather see him take a boxcutter deep into his taint.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It's never gonna happen, but getting Gaddafi'd would be the least he deserves. Just drop him naked in the middle of Kyiv.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Drop Putin into a crowd full of angry Ukrainians

            He'd die faster than President Snow.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              yeah

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Just send him to Serbia. The locals will lock him up and harvest his blood and semen, they believe it will give them supernatural powers.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Visually confirmed cope.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Got to be good when he has tracked thousands and it's always the same handful of cope pictures trying to discredit him.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          In the buck broken mind of the vatnik if just one is blurry that’s means they thousands of clear ones don’t count, doesn’t matter if it’s a still from a video

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >video stills
        Many such cases

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >don't believe your eyes goy these are hato propaganda

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        what % of the total are these?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/ukraine-think-deep-attacks-against-russian-logistics
      The oremise is right, one og the benefits on being on home turf is that enemy supply lines are more vulnerable than yours, but it seems kind of fancy-pants when the Ukes can just send flying squads out to mess with russian convoys and blow up actual trains

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        True, true. But some Russian chokepoints are out of missile reach.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          We also though Crimea was, yet here we are

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    THIS IS JUST WHAT RUSSIA WANTED!

    It frees up the soldiers who were being kept in the rear to shoot any retreating soldiers. Now the combined might of the Russian army will march forward and defeat all of NATO!

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing, really. Ukraine doesn't have the forces necessary to conduct successful offensive in that direction. Vatniks fell for the offensive meme and pulled some forces from the Donbas region Ukies did the whole fake offensive because their defences in Donbas started to show cracks. Nothing will come out this. You can screenshot this and remind me in 30 days, by then the offensive will still not happen. .

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Does lopsided attrition warfare on the defender's terms count as an offensive or do we reserve that word for driving down undefended roads to paint the map red

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ukraine just needs to hammer Russia's logistics & command and control until the enemy bleeds to death.

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Who cares, bridge was old obsolete model. Ukraine did us a favor. We have B14 bridgemata pontoon now.

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    https://kyivindependent.com/national/why-ukraine-struggles-to-combat-russias-artillery-superiority

    >less shill

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i'm sure the ukrainians will give their country up any day now

    2 more weeks

  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    So why arent ferrirs realistic to supply the kherson garrison?
    t.moron

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      To use a ferry to be your main supply route
      >vehicles arrive at landing
      >wait while vehicles are loaded onto ferry
      >slow trip across river
      >wait while vehicles are offloaded
      Turns a 5 minute crossing into a 30 minute or more ordeal where supply vehicles are easy targets for drones or artillery.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Shh. SSHHH! Stop trying to help them. It will be far more adorable to watch them figure it out themselves. The videos will be kino.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Is that a serious question? Can you imagine trying to supply ammunition, fuel, and food sufficient enough for the daily consumption of a force of 25,000 men? Not to mention whatever civilians are there also.

  46. 2 years ago
    apotheosis

    >how does that play
    do you forgot that russians have pontoons like 2 weeks now in the area?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      post pics

      >Hard Mode: How wide is the river, how fast is it flowing?

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Image taking a screenshot of Twitter and taking it seriously. I couldn't image being that much of a homosexual

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Such is the life of a redditor teenager

  48. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Deal with it

  49. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Hey /k/, should Ukraine give Russia a taste of Syrian Medicine?

    Such weapons would be easy to improvise.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wouldn't these be better as IEDs disguised as fuel drums?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      these work when the enemy doesnt have thousands of AA systems

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Why not just drones to drop them on the Vatniks?

        WaPo has been getting pretty Russian lately.

        Russian agents are definitely in the media promoting their lies. You can tell when they leave out Russia's Logistical problems.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wouldn't these be better as IEDs disguised as fuel drums?

      I wouldn't use a subjective term like "better." These are two possible applications of the concept, useful each in its own way under different circumstances.

      With the insane amount of munitions available in Ukraine right now, I'd imagine that this design can be improved upon in several ways to further extend useful applications. Trying to imagine how much more bang is possible should TNT be swapped out for C4. For example.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Barrel bomb with C4

        Yeah that would definitely blow Russians to hell. It would also help boost Ukraine's ability to strike more targets, freeing up HIMARS for the important strikes.

        Barrel bombs can be unleashed on infantry formations.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Considering it's an imprecise explosion weapon, I'd use it on large widespread targets. Namely Russian reinforcements out in the open.

  50. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Barrel bombs seem easy for Ukraine to make. Drop them on Russian positions.

    BIG boom.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What Russia doesn't seem to realize is that the longer this war goes on, the more we figure out it doesn't actually take that much to seriously frick with Russia's capabilities.

  51. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      where is the russian offensive and why are you spamming?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's going on slowly, I wouldn't worry about it 🙂
        And the topic is Herson, the picture was abou Herson, how is that spam?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          0.02% last month isn't an offensive
          where are the offensives? where is the strategy?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I mean, slowly taking ground isn't an offensive by some standards I guess. Though the speed isn't a requisite as far as I know. And to answer your question, the offensive right now is on the Artemovsk-Soledar axis. When it's completed, it will hamper the resupply of Seversk in the North. The overall strategy here seems to be a slow and steady advance peacemeal, slowly erradicating the Ukrainian army along with it.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Which is why Ukraine can and must continue to strike ALL points of Russian Logistics: trains, depots, trucks, etc.

              Without supplies, an attacking force cannot advance far.

              I think it's time for Ukraine to start using the Barrel Bomb. It's not too hard to mass-produce (fricking backward Syria built SEVENTEEN THOUSAND of the fricking things), and it will seriously frick up Russian massed formations when loaded with C4.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              no, !jeb!, that isn't a strategy any more than punching a nail is a strategy to hammer it into an oak log. russia tried strategy in the first month and went poorly. the current situation indicates a lack of strategy, and generals that are out of ideas.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Arty-spamming is useless if the Ukrainians disable Russian Logistics.

                Personally I also think Ukraine needs to start putting IEDs in the path of Russians and remote-detonating the frickers.

                Ukrainians, you want to win this? You fight with EVERY TRICK in the book.

                Begin making Improvised Explosive Devices and blowing up Russians with them. Vatniks try to advance? They keep trying? Barrel bombs.

                Maximum casualties are a must. Paint the grass red.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Seriously, look at this stuff. It's not hard for you to make Ukraine.

                To use an old Vietnamese saying about the French, "Kill all they send, and they'll stop coming."

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                ol charlie mayne

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Much as we praise the HIMARS, I think Ukraine needs to augment its efforts with much simpler & cheaper weapons. Ukraine needs explosive weapons to hit the Russian infantry formations NOW, and using HIMARS to do it is a fricking waste of its long-range precision.

                Cheap explosive weapons are the best route to go on that. They can be used over and over to blow up the Russians at will, while the HIMARS do the precise long-range attacks. Ukraine simply doesn't have enough HIMARS to hit all the targets they want to strike at point-blank range.

                Let the cheap shit kill the Russians close to the front lines.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                TLDR version: If Ukraine can endlessly hit the Russian entire front-line with cheap (but deadly) explosives, they'll wear the Russians down with their own form of arty-spam.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The problem with that principle is: cheap explosive weapons would have to be driven directly to the front, where they'd be massacred by counterbattery. If you're the guy advocating for barrel bombs from helis, that doesn't work either for obvious reasons.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Drones actually. No need to risk pilot lives. Expendable drones for cheap ordinance.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Well that's what they're doing already. The problem with that is the limited payload and range.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                They seem to be doing fine with it.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                s/fine/nothing/

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Still advancing.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                And at the rate they're going, this exact advance will end with the conquering of all Ukraine by the year 2122.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                So?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                backwards
                >GUR Spokesperson Andriy Usov reported on August 12 that Russian forces do not have a final date for their pseudo-referenda to annex occupied Ukrainian territories because Russian forces "do not control the situation" and no longer feel safe in Ukraine.[50] He argued that two factors are preventing Russian occupiers from holding their referenda: Ukrainian forces continue to liberate occupied territories, and Ukrainian civilians in occupied areas do not support the referenda. Russian occupation authorities continue to produce pro-referendum propaganda, however. The Russian deputy head of the Kherson Oblast Occupation Administration, Kirill Stremousov, shared videos of his meetings with citizens of Kherson Oblast on Telegram on August 12 alongside a claim that his meetings prove the people of Kherson Oblast “unanimously” want to join Russia to attain “economic stability, social equality, and security.[51]

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                they should unanimously kick his fricking head in

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, Ukraine says a lot of things, we know 🙂

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Offensive in the south is damaging the north
              uh huh, uh huh
              where do they get these guys?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, you're an embarrassment to Okraina shills.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      WaPo has been getting pretty Russian lately.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >A Republican media company shilling for the Russians.
        I'm shocked!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *