just 'shelter in place' and trust the government

you guys t-t-trust the US gov't right?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It takes only 2 metres of dirt to almost completely shield yourself from the radiation

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >It takes only 2 metres of dirt to almost completely shield yourself from the radiati
      Seriously? Big doubt, my friend.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >appealing to your own personal incredulity
        Have fun being moronic I guess

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You could give a source for something that sounds fantastical, you know.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You could have the agency to research it yourself instead of begging people to spoonfeed your entire reality to you

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >You could have the agency
              shut up and help me, butthole. I'm not lazy, I'm tired. I look up a ton of stuff and give links every got-damn day, the I video edit, then i give medication to my old cat. Frick off!

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Radiation is basically a bunch of small things moving really fast

                So put as much stuff that isn’t air between you and that stuff

                2 meters well packed soil will do in a pinch

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Sorry we’re just mad you guys went full Nazi and now need saving and it’s like Jesus man

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                WTF are you talking about, you insane butthole.
                Frick off back to Maxwell Hill.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Alpha
                Beta
                Gamma
                To get you started.
                And check out the rest of his interviews with this guy.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Thanks!

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It’s obvious that you will not survive anyway so why bother

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I've survived dangerous situations before, homo.
                I'll survive out of spite alone.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I’m sure these xdangerous_situationsx have prepared you for nuclear war, sure, lmao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                haha you would have died for sure, anon. No way in a snowball's chance in hell you would have avoided that shit.
                lmao even

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Don't let the haters keep you down bro. You're immortal right up until the moment you aren't. I believe in you.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Thanks, man. Also you should move from your state capital if you can.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >you should move from your state capital
                This. You should move somewhere they'll never nuke like rural Montana or Hawaii

                You could just dive. Water is the cheapest and most reliable way. Hence every nuclear reactor or highly radioactive fuel rods are stored in water. 20cm is all it takes.

                Best bet is to get in a swimming pool when the sirens start and stay under water. If you are outside of the range of the heat wave that would evaporate anything anyways, you are good.
                Modern nukes don't have much fallout or radiating effect anyways, unless Putin uses dirty bombs, which in turn wont have a large destructive force.

                >staying underwater for that amount of time
                And get pruned fingers? Ugh!

                [...]
                [...]
                the problem has never been shielding yourself from exposure to radiation from the particulate matter around you, the problem is biological exposure to those particulates, particularly inhaling them (but eating and drinking them is not good either, and they'll also get into the body through mucous membranes and so on)

                Yes dust in particular is the worst part. They can never dredge the Kiev reservoir because it will kick up all that Chernobyl dirt. It's probably a great place to dump bodies. Anyway, bunkers are just tombs which buy you a bit of time.

                >It weighs approximately 1kg/kg
                No shit. It weighs about 1kg per kilo
                Is 1kg of lead heavier than 1kg of feathers?

                That's why no one would buy gold with a stamp from you chinks.

                >germ struggles to identify humour
                Classic

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Radiation and nuclear chemistry is covered thoroughly enough in grade school that any reasonably intelligent 12 year old would not find that information unbelievable. If you make it through highschool without knowing enough to believe what anon said you're genuinely moronic. You realize freshly spent fuel rods are kept in pools of water, right? It doesn't take much water to completely shield any radiation.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >You could have the agency to research it yourself instead of begging people to spoonfeed your entire reality to you
              Kek.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Isnt the whole point of a website like this to share information freely?
              dont be a dick, be a dude.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/xniFz92.png

            Free copy of Nuclear war and survival skills

            https://ia800501.us.archive.org/35/items/NuclearWarSurvivalSkills_201405/nwss.pdf

            Source and read it, even bulk water will stop radiation.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's true. In fact it's only 1 metre to get the radiation down to safe levels, but more is better. 3cm of lead will do the same btw.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No, seriously. Radiation is blocked by mass alone, so if you get enough mass between you and the radiation you're good. When accounting for volume, lead works about the best for shielding from radiation but accounting for abundance and ease of use, dirt or gravel are generally much better options.

          I see...

          No, seriously. Radiation is blocked by mass alone, so if you get enough mass between you and the radiation you're good. When accounting for volume, lead works about the best for shielding from radiation but accounting for abundance and ease of use, dirt or gravel are generally much better options.

          >lead works about the best for shielding from radiation but accounting for abundance and ease of use, dirt or gravel are generally much better options.
          Yeah but that's hard to get and expensive, so yeah.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Lead prices range between free and $3/kg

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              It weighs a lot, anon, hence it'd cost a mint to acquire much of it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >It weighs a lot
                It weighs approximately 1kg/kg

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Fine, then show me where to get tons of it, then show me the cost to ship to WA State.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >spoonfeed me spoonfeed me spoonfeed me!
                You were certainly raised by a single mother. Why are you under the impression that materials of a low cost and high density are logistically expensive to ship?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Shut up, c**t. You don't know anything and are just making shit up. Everything is expensive, you goddamn israelite. kys.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                People who get offended as a result of their own stupidity have a special place in my heart. God bless you, based moron.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                how much is that in pounds

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It conveniently converts to approximately 1lb/lb

                Okay, but how do you plan on breathing?
                I see so many of these with just a fricking pipe and a filter on it as if that will be enough.
                I bet 90% of these shelters will instantly have the pipe clogged/destroyed and then two years later when people are cleaning up they'll find old shelters filled with people who all suffocated within 72 hours.

                >how do you plan on breathing?
                I wonder the same thing when I see how fat you lot are

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >It weighs approximately 1kg/kg
                No shit. It weighs about 1kg per kilo
                Is 1kg of lead heavier than 1kg of feathers?

                That's why no one would buy gold with a stamp from you chinks.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                but lead is heavier than feathers.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Memes aside that joke was always stupid because feathers do quite literally weigh less

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                oh my God. please be joking. heh

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Take 1 kg of feathers and 1 kg of lead ingot and measure the downward force on each under standard atmospheric conditions. Weight is not the same thing as mass; the American education system is designed to actively make you stupider.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                But the joke is: "a ton of X and a ton of Y", so frick you?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The joke is "a kilogram of steel or a kilogram of feathers".

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Not in America, kiddo.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What weighs more, a feather or an American brain?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                My paynoose on your mom's lips weigh a lot.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Your "paynoose" wouldn't register on a proton scale

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Anon, weight = mass*gravity. If they're both
                >each under standard atmospheric conditions
                i.e. gravity = g for both of them, and they're both 1kg mass, then the weight will be fricking equal (~9.81N). If they're both 1kg mass, then the only way they'd be different weights is if they were experiencing different amounts of gravity

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Moron kg is unit to measure weight
                so if two things have the same value then yes they have the same value

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >kg is unit to measure weight
                Jesus Christ. Thanks for making me feel a little better about America.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Lead prices range between free and $3/kg

                >Gamma radiation is the most penetrating and energetic form of nuclear radiation. To absorb half the incoming Gamma you need two and a half inches of concrete or almost half an inch of lead.

                >*Googles prices for 1/2 inch lead plate*
                >2,614 USD for a 1/2" x 4' x 8' plate - weights 950 lbs
                >NO FREE SHIPPING

                k.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                alternatively just melt down some fishing weights in a WELL VENTILATED PLACE. Do not breathe that shit. Then maybe lacquer it or something just to minimize contact. You don't have to pay an arm and a leg for lead.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >*Searches bulk prices for lead fishing weights*
                >($2.20 - $3.00) / lb
                >$2,090 - $2,850 for 950 lbs to make a 1/2"x1'x1' plate
                Still expensive as frick, plus your own time, labor, and equipment.

                >*Searches bulk prices for lead shot*
                >Reclaimed is half the price of new at ($2.40 - $2.64)/ lb
                >$2,280 - $2,580 for 950 lbs to make a 1/2"x1'x1' plate
                Still expensive as frick, plus your own time, labor, and equipment.

                >buying lead plates
                lmao moron. You can buy cheap scrap lead or even get it for free and melt it over a fricking fire.

                >*Searches bulk prices for scrap lead in Washington State*
                >~$1.03 per lbs
                >$978.5
                Not as expensive, but still up there. Plus your own time, labor, and equipment.

                >*Searches lead melting temperature*
                >621.5°F
                >*Searches wood fire temperature*
                >A campfire can reach internal temperatures of 1650°F in the flames, known as the continuous flame region. Cooking Temperature: Above the flames (called the thermal plume region) where no flames are visible, you can expect temperatures of about 600°F
                Sounds easily doable, I guess that's why a lot of the earliest metal pipes and drinking vessels were lead. Too bad it's toxic to humans.

                >*Searches for videos of people reclaiming scrap metal*
                >Finds one of someone who uses reclaimed lead from a shooting range
                >555lbs of bullets and shot resulting in 351lbs after losses from impurities and oxidation
                >Being generous I'll round it up from 63.24% to 65% recovery rate and 35% losses

                Still not sounding like it's worth it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >buying lead plates
                lmao moron. You can buy cheap scrap lead or even get it for free and melt it over a fricking fire.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You have to be rather close to the bomb to be affected by gamma radiation, so close that you will get killed by the blast wave or incinerated if you are caught in the open.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          lead doesn't help for neutron radiation

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          So I can shelter under my ammo cans? Oh man, WWIII is going to be great, I can't wait.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No, seriously. Radiation is blocked by mass alone, so if you get enough mass between you and the radiation you're good. When accounting for volume, lead works about the best for shielding from radiation but accounting for abundance and ease of use, dirt or gravel are generally much better options.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The nuclear war survival guide is an excellent tool.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you didn't read the manual to the end. this is the first 2 hours the mud shelter will protect until radioactive dust starts to fall from the sky. 2 hours maximum (20 minutes real time)

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >you didn't read the manual to the end
        I didn't imply it was a permanent solution

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      And then you're fricked because you hid in a two foot hole.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        He's implying he's got a bunker below it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        > 2 meters of dirt = 2 foot hole
        American education, everyone.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Okay, but how do you plan on breathing?
      I see so many of these with just a fricking pipe and a filter on it as if that will be enough.
      I bet 90% of these shelters will instantly have the pipe clogged/destroyed and then two years later when people are cleaning up they'll find old shelters filled with people who all suffocated within 72 hours.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      So ww2 bunkers would be enough? Those are closer to my home than the cold war atomic bunker.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You could just dive. Water is the cheapest and most reliable way. Hence every nuclear reactor or highly radioactive fuel rods are stored in water. 20cm is all it takes.

      Best bet is to get in a swimming pool when the sirens start and stay under water. If you are outside of the range of the heat wave that would evaporate anything anyways, you are good.
      Modern nukes don't have much fallout or radiating effect anyways, unless Putin uses dirty bombs, which in turn wont have a large destructive force.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Depending on the distance to the atomic bomb, the water may start boiling due to the radiation. Just as it happens in a nuclear power plant.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It is not your fault that you don't understand radiation or nuclear power. It's our school's fault.
          No. Water in reactors boils because the uranium rods get hot due to the energy released in during the fission caused by radiation of neutrons. Just neutron radiation though.
          The radiation from radioactive materials itself cannot generate heat. Water in spent fuel pools gets hot because of the residual heat of the rods and remaining decay process. Incomparable to decay of radiocarbon or the radioactive fallout dust on the clothes in Chernobyl or from a bomb.
          If you meant HEAT radiation from the bomb, then yes. But you don't have to worry about radiation sickness in that case.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          the pool would need to be pretty damn close to ground zero.
          water has a high heat capacity so i don't see someone getting cooked in a 10,000-gal pool if they are not in the incineration zone.
          if its an in-ground pool thats even less surface area the thermal radiation would contact.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Above-ground pools finally btfo

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Fuel rods are not stored in water you fricking idiot, the rods heating up water is how it generates power.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          If the rods aren't in there they frickin explode and kill us all, dork. The other anon is correct.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You truly have no idea what you're talking about.

            Fuel rods ARE a storage method, Fuel rods are metal tubes filled with uranium pellets, which prior to being put into bundles in the reactor core aren't even really that radioactive. They only enter water to flash boil it. Which is the problem with your moronic premises, water doesn't actually survive contact with fuel rods. And they don't explode, 'dork', they just get so hot they will melt damn near anything, including the floor and ground. Thus, Melting Down.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's true. In fact it's only 1 metre to get the radiation down to safe levels, but more is better. 3cm of lead will do the same btw.

      No, seriously. Radiation is blocked by mass alone, so if you get enough mass between you and the radiation you're good. When accounting for volume, lead works about the best for shielding from radiation but accounting for abundance and ease of use, dirt or gravel are generally much better options.

      the problem has never been shielding yourself from exposure to radiation from the particulate matter around you, the problem is biological exposure to those particulates, particularly inhaling them (but eating and drinking them is not good either, and they'll also get into the body through mucous membranes and so on)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This is pretty moronic. Hypothetically if you wore jslist and hung out inside for a week you'd be totally fine assuming you have enough food, iodine, and water on hand. Radiation from modern nukes that aren't specifically meant to irradiate everything dissipates pretty fast. I'm talking a few weeks. Nukes by themselves are only a big threat if you live within the blast radius.
      Being outside with that shit is a different story though. In the Army the saying in my unit was "the pro in pro mask doesn't stand for protecting life, it stands for prolonging life so you can complete your mission".

      >It takes only 2 metres of dirt to almost completely shield yourself from the radiati
      Seriously? Big doubt, my friend.

      You could theoretically stack cases of water like you'd buy at the grocery store like sandbags and that would be enough to keep you unscathed. Again, as long as you aren't within the blast radius or right next to it you're fine in terms of effects of the nuke itself.
      For perspective, Jimmy Carter famously took 90 second shifts inside a fricked up nuclear reactor over the course of a week. The radiation in that sort of environment is a gorillion times worse than the fallout from a nuke that is meant to just go boom and not necessarily irradiate everything.
      Hiroshima and Nagasaki became habitable pretty quickly. Chernobyl will be uninhabitable pretty much forever.

      Aerosolized isotopes are what's going to kill everyone after a nuclear exchange, and NO ONE can protect themselves from these.
      The reason that all atmospheric nuclear testing was halted in the 1960s was because TPTB discovered just how prolific these isotopes become.

      After ww2 there were tests where they had soldiers in trenches right under nuclear blasts. Long term they had issues but otherwise they lived. There were also Hiroshima/Nagasaki survivors that lingered on into their 80s and 90s too.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >You could theoretically stack cases of water like you'd buy at the grocery store like sandbags and that would be enough to keep you unscathed
        Uhhhhh?

        >Again, as long as you aren't within the blast radius or right next to it you're fine in terms of effects of the nuke itself.
        Right.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It's been known for years that 7cm of water is enough to shield from radiation. This is one instance where muh trusting the science holds true because these sorts of tidbits are how we have nuclear reactors and spent fuel rods all over the place without irradiating everything.
          A case of water is much thicker than 7cm.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >This is one instance where muh trusting the science holds true because these sorts of tidbits are how we have nuclear reactors and spent fuel rods all over the place without irradiating everything.
            >A case of water is much thicker than 7cm.
            By jove, you're right.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Won't the air turn to poison if you don't have scrubbers to clean air? Always months worth of drinking water ,food .
      Alex Jones says he's gonna eat his neighbours and I also will be eating my neighbours ass

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I also will be eating my neighbours ass
        Again?

        Anon, weight = mass*gravity. If they're both
        >each under standard atmospheric conditions
        i.e. gravity = g for both of them, and they're both 1kg mass, then the weight will be fricking equal (~9.81N). If they're both 1kg mass, then the only way they'd be different weights is if they were experiencing different amounts of gravity

        Moron kg is unit to measure weight
        so if two things have the same value then yes they have the same value

        Mass is simply the amount of matter something contains
        Weight is the downward force experienced by an object depending upon its mass and the local gravity
        Did you simply never question the function of feathers?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          > Weight is the downward force experienced by an object depending upon its mass and the local gravity
          You utter fricking moron, tell us how do you know if two different items have the same value in weight?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            A kg is not a unit of weight. I know you auscucks try really hard to impress the mutts but you don't have to be as stupid as they are.

            https://i.imgur.com/JfyqEBz.jpg

            >Weight is the downward force experienced by an object depending upon its mass and the local gravity
            Yes, and we just established that 1kg of feathers and 1kg of steel have equal mass (1kg), and since they're both on Earth and in the same location they're subject to the same force of gravity (g = 9.81m/s^2).
            So they'll weigh the same. You daft bastard.

            It's almost as though feathers are designed by nature to have a lower relative downward force by being supported by air. Almost. Just almost.

            Isnt the whole point of a website like this to share information freely?
            dont be a dick, be a dude.

            The point of this website is to post something objectively true and watch as the imbeciles struggle to deal with it.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >It's almost as though feathers are designed by nature to have a lower relative downward force by being supported by air.
              This is like the Nega-Limmy, where the Limmy character in the sketch couldn't wrap his head around it because it clashed with his naive schema of 'steel=heavy, feather=light'. Here we've got a homie who can't wrap his head around it because he's *overthinking* it.
              "It's alright mate, don't worry about it."

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Your difficulty in compreheding the difference between mass and weight or the fact that atmosphere does not exist in the absence of gravity does not constitute a lack of intellect on my part.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >The point of this website
              wait what? there's a point to this website?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >there's a point to this website?
                Yes. It's hidden in the depths of

                [...]

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I think I found it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Shut it down

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              > A kg is not a unit of weight.
              Damn and I though the meme was American IQ
              > a unit of force or weight equal to the weight of a kilogram mass under a gravitational attraction equal to that of the earth
              Lmao
              you know it is homosexual that’s why you didn’t answer my question

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >spending over an hour and a half thinking about it and still being wrong
                A kilogram is a unit of mass, not weight. 1 kg is still 1 kg in a vacuum without gravity and therefore irrelevant of buoyancy. Units of weight do not follow this axiom. You are definitely a Centrelink recipient.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Weight is the downward force experienced by an object depending upon its mass and the local gravity
          Yes, and we just established that 1kg of feathers and 1kg of steel have equal mass (1kg), and since they're both on Earth and in the same location they're subject to the same force of gravity (g = 9.81m/s^2).
          So they'll weigh the same. You daft bastard.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            acktchyuially
            if you measure weight in normal conditions and not in a vacuum enclosure, you also have to take buoyancy into account
            atmosphere at sea level having roughly a 1kg/m^3 density, one kg of steel experiences a lifting buoyancy force of roughly 0.13 grams
            while one kg of feathers experiences a stronger force because it is less dense, that I guesstimate at about 1 gram because I'm not sure of the feathers density but it should be in the neighborhood of 1kg/liter

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The radiation is completely inconsequential in nuclear weapons.
      If you are close enough to get a significant prompt radiation dose your odds of surviving the blast wave are <1%.
      Being underground does however help avoid the blastwave as well. It's much better than being in a surface building of any kind.

      Won't the air turn to poison if you don't have scrubbers to clean air? Always months worth of drinking water ,food .
      Alex Jones says he's gonna eat his neighbours and I also will be eating my neighbours ass

      Fallout affects only a relatively small area.
      Protip: don't stay in an area that is exposed to fallout. Just move away from the explosion site. The further away you are the smaller the odds it will rain radioactive shit precisely where you are.
      Will be wise to carry a dosimeter, though, and take iodine daily.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >just get in the grave, bro

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Only 6 ft really.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Seems like they're going to do it. If they do it soon, I will die a horrible painful death the first strike.
    If it happens much later, I may have a chance.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Of course you'll survive if you curl up in a ball under your desk

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >"Just stay in your house for - Two Weeks - and everything will be fine

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          As many as 2000 warheads hitting just the Dakota missile fields alone. Hopefully the ayys won’t allow it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >implying the ayys aren’t egging the whole thing on so they can pick the bones without breaking interstellar law via an overt invasion

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >central florida

          YES

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >tfw less than 30 miles from DC
          whelp I guess im not gonna make it
          maybe I have a chance if it is "just" north korea, but any nuclear exchange with Russia or China and I'm toast

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Why Ft Myers/Naples Florida area? tf

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Need Minnesota

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                1/2

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Thank you, anon

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                2/2

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                do New York and tennesse

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Florida

          Russia won't even ICBM Florida, they will use their Poseidon tsunami bombs launched from submarines https://www.newsweek.com/putin-russia-poseidon-nuclear-torpedo-tsunami-1774946

          Probably do gulf coast too to take out Tampa.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know if you've been around for my occasional threads on the matter. Expect something that resembles the Poseidon, in US waters, but much further south than Florida, and probably not performed by the Russians. The proving grounds are ready and the hour is almost here.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I already have a teepee in the woods. Bring it, hebrews.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Looks like I am in the clear 🙂

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >didn't shoop "do you even lift bro" into picrel
            NGMI

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >"Just stay in your house for - Two Weeks - and everything will be fine
        Two month actually. Depending on how bad an area was nuked and your proximity to the fallout. The real danger is going to be the million urban survivors scrambling for food and water.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Didn't Russia say they would just use 1 30 megaton bomb which would be enough to destroy all of England?
      England got uppity about Ukraine like 6 months back and i remember Russian media saying all it would take is 1 nuke.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Russia could do it they used their most powerful nuke with a MIRV.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >and i remember Russian media saying all it would take is 1 nuke.
        Russia also said that its hypersonic missile had a range of planet earth and could correct course to avoid radar detection.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >literally 5 eyes

          We see your missiles. Idiot.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        they claim they can use a single 100mt torpedo to create a 500m tsunami that will drown all of the UK
        this is obviously bullshit and just a moronic idea in general.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I'm not going to fault Russia for giving us hope that someone will finally drown all of the anglos

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It’s a 200MT torpedo actually and yes it will work

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            the energy from the tohoku earthquake in 2011 was around 6-7 million megatons for reference
            even detonating a 200mt nuke near the surface would only cause damage to the immediate coastline.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/GL18RiU.png

      >"Just stay in your house for - Two Weeks - and everything will be fine

      https://i.imgur.com/MM2gnFH.png

      90%+ of people dieing in a nuclear war will die of starvation only a miniscule amount will die in the inital blasts (compared to the overall deathtoll)
      logistics will break down and majority of infrastructur is destroyed
      it will become impossible to get enough food for anyone not living near foregeable land

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm moving to sterling, Scotland

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    what the frick kind of name is that, some sort of poojew?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Probably an anagram of "This is all bullshit" in some monkey language.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Behind modern democracy hide billionaires and their proxies. Neither wing of our establishment cares about regular Americans. They would give banks, Wall Street, Israel, Ukraine, and Silicon Valley all the money in the world before they would give you one more sick day for work.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I was taught in grade school to put my head between my knees in the event of a nuclear blast. Presumably to break my neck upon detonation

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Aerosolized isotopes are what's going to kill everyone after a nuclear exchange, and NO ONE can protect themselves from these.
    The reason that all atmospheric nuclear testing was halted in the 1960s was because TPTB discovered just how prolific these isotopes become.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      STFU. It's gonna be a false flag if it happens at all and it'll be 5G directed Active Denial burns to simulate "radiation effects" on the skin, then they'll just directly poison anybody stupid enough to go into a hospital. Which will be you.

      Enjoy your hydrochloric acid injections.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Educate yourselves. Don't rely on the media for fricksake...

    https://ia800501.us.archive.org/35/items/NuclearWarSurvivalSkills_201405/nwss.pdf

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    even if you knew where a shelter is you wont be able to fricking get there
    fricking morons

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You gotta make yer own. This has been on my mind for two years now, ever since the media won't shut the frick up about it. And military planes are going nuts around here at night AND TV is interrupted by the Emergency Alert system A LOT lately.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If you read the OP you’d know we’re talking about locations miles away from the area of impact, doofus. You’ll have enough time if you’re prepared.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        noone is warning you, you will find out when you see the flash and a mushroom cloud

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    radioactive dust will kill you pretty quick.
    got to stay in a sealed basement for 2 weeks to let the dust settle.
    the castle bravo test killed a bunch of fishermen who got engulfed in a cloud of radioactive dust.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >got to stay in a sealed basement for 2 weeks
      /misc/ should have no problem adjusting

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        lol this made me happy.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          brown bricks

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        adjusting to what?

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    "Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that is unprofitable for you." Hebrews 13:17

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why would you want to survive?
    >no running water
    >no power
    >no any kinds of comms (phone, net, radio, satellite)
    >no conveniences
    >no relative safety
    >no order
    >no food
    >most people you know are dead or dying
    >always on the run, never safe
    >contamination everywhere

    I could write some more, but that already is sufficient to dissuade me personally, from trying to survive a post-apocalyptic shithole Earth. I know that the larpers here would like to think otherwise, but unless you homosexuals have extensive experience living in isolation for months at a time, either entirely alone or with a small group of friends or family, taking care of your needs, being entirely self sufficient and living off grid without any high tech or contact with the system whatsoever, then you're deluding yourselves.

    99.9% of /misc/ preppers wouldn't make it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >no running water
      >no power
      >no any kinds of comms (phone, net, radio, satellite)
      >no conveniences
      >no relative safety
      >no order
      >no food
      >most people you know are dead or dying
      >always on the run, never safe
      >contamination everywhere

      So basically just modern day Africa then.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >>no running water
      Because you might be able to get to some later.
      >>no power
      Batteries.
      >>no any kinds of comms (phone, net, radio, satellite)
      Don't count on that.
      >>no conveniences
      Ok?
      >>no relative safety
      True.
      >>no order
      More truth.

      Wrong.
      >>most people you know are dead or dying
      OH NO! The people who dicks to me for decades will die? NOT THAT!
      on the run, never safe
      Eh, maybe maybe not.
      everywhere
      Maybe maybe not.

      tl;dr frick you blackpill gay

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >unless you homosexuals have extensive experience living in isolation for months at a time
      Where the frick do you think you are? Of course most of us are not going to make it. But anything is better than wageslaving in current society.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        getting raped by warlords in an apocalyptic wastelands sounds that much better to you?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yes

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      to f my neighbor

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The Demise of the Doomcoomer. A beautiful tale of one man's last minute chance to seize the life he'd always dreamed of.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >unless you homosexuals have extensive experience living in isolation for months at a time, either entirely alone or with a small group of friends or family, taking care of your needs
      ... Where do you think you are?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      100% agreed

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I want to survive because I really really want to eat a person and that seems like the only time I can get away with it
      Don't know about you nerds, don't care

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      what a frickin time to be alive though

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Why would you want to survive?
      Golden opportunity to remove Black folk

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Why would you want to survive?
      To experience the greatest golden age in human history. You must navigate the darkness to find the light.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >but unless you homosexuals have extensive experience living in isolation for months at a time,
      obviously we do anon

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This is just as much of a larp as the pepper stuff. Very unintelligent post.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      quitter

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Be a post-apocalyptic wise-man

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >unless you homosexuals have extensive experience living in isolation for months at a time, either entirely alone or with a small group of friends or family, taking care of your needs, being entirely self sufficient and living off grid without any high tech or contact with the system whatsoever, then you're deluding yourselves.
      This post was written by a woman.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They're not wrong. You'll get infections and diseases that simply won't go away without somewhere to take refuge so you aren't constantly exposed, medicine to treat them as well as knowledge of how to treat the symptoms. I spent the summer re-familiarizing with the woods I spent my childhood in and immediately made the mistake of letting muddy water soak into my boots. The infection of the nail on my big toe set in so fricking fast it made the walk home agonizing. Cleared up in a day of putting peroxide on it. Thats just a small example of how fast and how easily nature can frick you raw in thousands of ways.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      just dying is not as easy as you think. your own will to live might surprise you.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Why would you want to survive?
      to spite kykes

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Longest flight time of an ICBM is 30 minutes
    >Less if sub launched ICBM
    >Detection limitations knock that down to 25 minutes
    >processed by NMCC, they know, you don't.
    >10 minutes to make decision to release information to public
    >15 minutes if you hear the very first announcement of attack
    15 minutes to make it safety
    you are NGMI

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They would not tell anyone we were under a nuclear attack, are you even kidding me? If they told people, the highways would instantly jam, meaning VIP israelites could not get on their private planes to Israel or to the various government bunkers. In the event of a nuclear attack there'd be complete silence until detonations occurred, and then when that happened, the internet would suddenly stop working and television would become static in most of the country. Automated alerts might kick in hours or days later after it no longer matters.

      Your best chance to survive a nuclear war is to get on a boat to the Caribbean or head to South America.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You can make it if you have a shelter on your property.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That "if" depends on where you live. If you lived somewhere like the UP of Michigan or a desert in the Southwest you would survive the initial attack just fine. The fallout has to be dealt with, the entire electric and water grids down, the food supply disrupted for a decade, and the roving bands of mutated Black person zombies looking to make a meal out of you. Surviving a full on nuclear attack is not as simple as waiting two weeks inside your house with bottled water and MREs

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Surviving a full on nuclear attack is not as simple as waiting two weeks inside your house with bottled water and MREs
          It could be
          Even if my local military bases take direct hits from some of Putin's good stuff, there's a chance I'd survive underground during the blast *if* I have at least a minute or two of warning.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I live in Colorado Springs. If I get a warning, I am grabbing a bottle of bourbon, a large Family Bible, a lawn chair and heading out to the front yard in a speedo and pair of sunglasses. I hope there's time for me to put on some SPF 5000. I can sit there and watch Cheyenne Mountain implode before I melt into radioactive ooze.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >before I melt into radioactive ooze.
              You'd be turned into diamonds. Really.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                good then

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Let's just pray it doesn't happen..

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I have been praying about it a lot lately, and trying to prepare. I need a few years to move away from this deathtrap. I doubt God is going to change a time table just for me though

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I doubt God is going to change a time table just for me though
                He's done stranger things. He gave the world to Satan because Satan got upset. So, don't discount yourself.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The goal is to have enough to get away from large urban centers. Problem is my kids, all spread out now. Nothing is certain I suppose.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >The goal is to have enough to get away from large urban centers
                Right. The thing is, I can think of everything, except how the frick to limp to mountains after everything's done to shit and there may be, well, marauders, rapists, raiders, no-goodniks, what to do with them? Shoot them, sure, but they will also have guns. Hmm

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >He gave the world to Satan
                moron take.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Frick off, non-reader. God GAVE the world to Satan "temporarily" because Satan CRIED over his fate. He pled with God to have authority over the world and yes, God gave it to he.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                christcucks are cringe
                You homosexuals being nothing of value to any thread
                you worship a israelite btw

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Cool MAYT.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                they key is to not give up.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >15 minutes
      Or 2 weeks advance warning if you browse /misc/.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      LMAO this anon thinks they will actually tell us the nukes are coming
      they do not plan to tell us jack shit moron

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Iran got a new ICBM and the israelites are getting all sweaty palms.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Why do the yids need ICBMs with a range of 3000 miles if all of their threats are adjacent to them?

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    nuke are fake and op is gay

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I would be most worried about an EMP happening.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nukes are an EMP happening.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        that don't exist neither
        see technologies evolved but not that much the plan is still to throw as many bomb as fast as you can and that they do it pretty well you got to admit it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Your only hope for an EMP is a CME.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I would be most worried about an EMP happening.
        That's bullshit, you can even use chatgpt to calculate how big the bom must be

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I am not leaving. In a suburb anyway, with huge forests nearby.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >with huge forests nearby.
      Okay so you'd just be roasted to death.
      Fun fact: After the nukes go off and the radioactive dust begins to settle, the forests and cities will continue to be on fire. The resulting firestorm, which will burn until there's nothing left to burn, will repeatedly douse you with radioactive dust. So the "shelter for two weeks" thing is bullshit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        pure unadulterated doom porn
        the moron who believe in nukes are the same who believe in the moon landing fricking nerds more akin to marvel super hero fans but on a copious dose of adderall
        since multiples years

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >check flag
          >see moronic post
          No surprise. Range ban this entire homosexual chink country.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            still fake and gay
            the frick do you want me to say
            your drawing is more real than nuclear weapons

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That's pessimism talking. You're overstating their capabilities.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >fire makes stuff radioactive
        Half life is half life, fire doesn't magically extend it.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What are the least likely places in America to get nuked?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wyoming, Nebraska, Utah

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That's where our ICBM fields are. First place to get targeted, along with C2 centers.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          ICBMs are not in the likely first 500 targets, military bases are.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >they'll target a grunt ranch before they hit the silos
            How and when did Americans become the stupidest people on Earth?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              He's (probably) not stupid, he just worded it stupidly. He's right, but only because reduced warhead numbers make a counterforce strike against silos too wasteful so the counterforce strike is all bases and then follow-on attacks are countervalue targets. Counterforce against silo launchers is old doctrine from before SALT and START.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              A nuke can take out one silo. You're overestimating the power of nukes or how closely we have them spaced. The idea is that the nukes are already in the air before the silo can be taken out, so the point is to impair the ability for the US to invade. Military bases and major cities are strategically more important to the US military being able to wage wars than one nuke to one silo.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yea the blanket saturation with CEP will capitulate with fratricide with each fireball , some solos may still work , most will have some sort of failsafe engagement. The rest is up to the misslemen to fire at the right point during cascade.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yup counterforce on control and command. There is a cap on that thought because of TACAMO the Russians tried to copy it but it’s been scuttled and and robbed twice. Doubt theirs works as efficiently.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    People in the states don't trust their government only their politicians so long as they have "the proper" letter after their name. Americans are probably the most government loving people you could ever meet of all time ever.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Americans are probably the most government loving people you could ever meet of all time ever.
      Nope. When the White House in the film Independence Day got zapped by aliens, everyone in the theaters cheered.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    nukes are a meme, its fake and gay to keep boomers in fear

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They would all be out filming the blast with their cell phones and get annihilated.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Of course not

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Free copy of Nuclear war and survival skills

    https://ia800501.us.archive.org/35/items/NuclearWarSurvivalSkills_201405/nwss.pdf

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I mean, I live in my state's capital, like 2 minutes from the actual building. I'm fricked either way.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Capitals aren't necessarily targets because they're capitals - but most are targets because they happen to have other value. A few capitals aren't even included on a 2000 warhead exchange scenario.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Why do I have to live an alleged MEGADETH WOO zone?
        What did Lord God mean by this?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I wouldn't even worry about the black dots. It's unlikely that Russia still has that many working ICBMs. If you're in the middle of a bunch of triangles like me, then you at least won't have to worry about slow agonizing radiation death.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >I wouldn't even worry about the black dots.
            knee-grow I live near those fricking gay purple triangles of certain death.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Oh yeah, even China has enough nukes to hit most of the gay triangles of death.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >If you're in the middle of a bunch of triangles like me, then you at least won't have to worry about slow agonizing radiation death.
            Great. So our only chance is to wait out the radiation? Is that possible?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Not sure. There's a website where you can model that stuff. I don't think it will be as bad as depicted in movies considering several countries have been testing hundreds of nukes over the past 85 years.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >considering several countries have been testing hundreds of nukes over the past 85 years.
                Yeah but that's not 300 possible nukes coming over the Arctic Circle and out of the ocean to get us, is the thing.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Not sure. I've heard anons argue that nuclear fallout is way overhyped. I guess there's a ton of Japanese who were close to the sites, helped with the cleanup, and then lived to be old. Those were way weaker, though.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Those were way weaker, though.
                That's the deal, so I just pray it never happens because if you survive, there might not be many places left that aren't toxic zones forever.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        For example - look at Jefferson City, Missouri. Not a target. But the nearby military base and nuclear reactor are targets.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Funny thing is, Russia can protect 80% or more of its population in prepared nuclear bunkers and regularly practice evacuation drills.
    What do our leaders do for us in the west?
    Very telling.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Duck and cover frens. Your government loves you!

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >shelter in place
    isn't that a nation?

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    so the indians will just use the shit in their streets and build a huge fortress with 2 meter thick walls and they will survive.

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    After the first nuclear detonation happens that is your sign.
    It will be small scale usage at first. A tactical nuke in Ukraine or a nuclear terrorist attack someplace. That's your sign to get to safety, if you have a job quit, get in your car and get to someplace safe.

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    they are saying homes in America are shit quality and will either fail completely or simply allow contaminated particles into the home.
    this isn't surprising in the slightest.

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Crazy how we haven't seen a video of a nuke blast since the same time we video tapped landing on the moon.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Crazy how we haven't seen a video of a nuke blast since we stopped publicly testing nukes
      Unimaginable innit

      >*Searches bulk prices for lead fishing weights*
      >($2.20 - $3.00) / lb
      >$2,090 - $2,850 for 950 lbs to make a 1/2"x1'x1' plate
      Still expensive as frick, plus your own time, labor, and equipment.

      >*Searches bulk prices for lead shot*
      >Reclaimed is half the price of new at ($2.40 - $2.64)/ lb
      >$2,280 - $2,580 for 950 lbs to make a 1/2"x1'x1' plate
      Still expensive as frick, plus your own time, labor, and equipment.

      [...]
      >*Searches bulk prices for scrap lead in Washington State*
      >~$1.03 per lbs
      >$978.5
      Not as expensive, but still up there. Plus your own time, labor, and equipment.

      >*Searches lead melting temperature*
      >621.5°F
      >*Searches wood fire temperature*
      >A campfire can reach internal temperatures of 1650°F in the flames, known as the continuous flame region. Cooking Temperature: Above the flames (called the thermal plume region) where no flames are visible, you can expect temperatures of about 600°F
      Sounds easily doable, I guess that's why a lot of the earliest metal pipes and drinking vessels were lead. Too bad it's toxic to humans.

      >*Searches for videos of people reclaiming scrap metal*
      >Finds one of someone who uses reclaimed lead from a shooting range
      >555lbs of bullets and shot resulting in 351lbs after losses from impurities and oxidation
      >Being generous I'll round it up from 63.24% to 65% recovery rate and 35% losses

      Still not sounding like it's worth it.

      >Still not sounding like it's worth it.
      Yes, much cheaper to be instantly vapourised.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >instantly vapourised.
        If you were within the blast range where you could be vaporized a thin later of dirt and lead wouldn't help you.
        *baka*
        All leafs really are moronic.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >not comprehending a joke about your miserly approach to nuclear war preparedness
          This thread is a thriving testament to American stupidity.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Not comprehending labor, material, and quality costs when saying "JUST DO IT YOURSELF"
            This is why Canada will never be a first world country and is only a Chinese vassal state.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Canada will never be an American ally against the Soviet Union because you can't read a room?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This moronic subhuman IQ take is why everyone here hates leafs.
                >HurrDurr everything I said was clearly a joke now that you did some basic searching that a 7 year old could have done learn to read a room omg lol
                >also I'm going to bring up the soviet union for no reason at all

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You went from
                >OMG buying lead plates online is too expensive!
                to
                >reeeeeeee leaf why didn't you spoonfeed me the entire logistics of melting down scrap lead which I'd never even considered prior to your mentioning it ITT
                lol&lmao
                >>I'm going to bring up the soviet union for no reason at all
                I'm not the one who brought up 1st world countries, did you just now stop insisting on being literal?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Calls you out on your BS
                >Provides data on your half baked ideas with 5 minutes of searching
                >Leaf claims to have some magical method of getting free scrap when buying scrap for the size of a small cutting board is 195lbs and over 2k, making it barely cheaper than just buying solid slabs of lead
                >Leaf claims to have some magical method of getting 100% yields of scrap
                >Leaf claims to have intimate knowledge of the logistics of something he's clearly never even looked into since everything else he's saying about it is easily proven wrong
                >Seems to enjoy randomly bringing up the USSR think his country has the ability to be allies with an entity that hasn't existed for 30+ years and is flipflopping on everything he said being a joke or being literal

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                See

                Lead prices range between free and $3/kg

                https://i.imgur.com/U3ygwym.png

                [...]
                >Gamma radiation is the most penetrating and energetic form of nuclear radiation. To absorb half the incoming Gamma you need two and a half inches of concrete or almost half an inch of lead.

                >*Googles prices for 1/2 inch lead plate*
                >2,614 USD for a 1/2" x 4' x 8' plate - weights 950 lbs
                >NO FREE SHIPPING

                k.

                >buying lead plates
                lmao moron. You can buy cheap scrap lead or even get it for free and melt it over a fricking fire.

                >*Searches bulk prices for lead fishing weights*
                >($2.20 - $3.00) / lb
                >$2,090 - $2,850 for 950 lbs to make a 1/2"x1'x1' plate
                Still expensive as frick, plus your own time, labor, and equipment.

                >*Searches bulk prices for lead shot*
                >Reclaimed is half the price of new at ($2.40 - $2.64)/ lb
                >$2,280 - $2,580 for 950 lbs to make a 1/2"x1'x1' plate
                Still expensive as frick, plus your own time, labor, and equipment.

                [...]
                >*Searches bulk prices for scrap lead in Washington State*
                >~$1.03 per lbs
                >$978.5
                Not as expensive, but still up there. Plus your own time, labor, and equipment.

                >*Searches lead melting temperature*
                >621.5°F
                >*Searches wood fire temperature*
                >A campfire can reach internal temperatures of 1650°F in the flames, known as the continuous flame region. Cooking Temperature: Above the flames (called the thermal plume region) where no flames are visible, you can expect temperatures of about 600°F
                Sounds easily doable, I guess that's why a lot of the earliest metal pipes and drinking vessels were lead. Too bad it's toxic to humans.

                >*Searches for videos of people reclaiming scrap metal*
                >Finds one of someone who uses reclaimed lead from a shooting range
                >555lbs of bullets and shot resulting in 351lbs after losses from impurities and oxidation
                >Being generous I'll round it up from 63.24% to 65% recovery rate and 35% losses

                Still not sounding like it's worth it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ... You just proved my point?
                Thank you?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Your point was that you're a moron who stuck the goalposts up his ass and went for a run? In that case yes.
                >no u can't do that because lead plates from this one online store are too expensive and no free shipping
                >no u can't do that because I don't know how
                >no u can't do that because I just watched one video about bullets and it wasn't 100% yield
                >no u can't just acquire lead at market value or lower
                >no u can't just use lead's atypically low melting temperature to extract and cast it with ease
                >no u can't just because umm uhh umm uhh I umm uhh uhh umm I umm uhh u just can't okay???

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You're the only one moving goalposts and have yet to prove anything you've said other than autistic screeching and deflection.
                Again, you leafs are all moronic.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >no u
                The standard death rattle of the defeated mutt
                I firmly stand by my original point about the objective feasibility of lead and Earth as insulation against radiation. At some point I offended your low wit and you haven't been able to be coherent since.
                >it's too expensive
                >I don't know how
                lol lmao ngmi

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Earth
                Earth is what is recommended in military handbooks for ad-hoc radiation shelters in the field.
                I'm planning to build an earth-bermed earthbag house for that reason

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Predictive programming.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Predictive programming.
      You've been holding nuclear strike preparedness drills in schools since the '50s you dumb zoomer. Amerimutts just pretended they'd won the Cold War as soon as the Soviets changed their skin.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I cant wait for this shit.

    I pray for it every day.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >This is the first study that shows the impact of nuclear shockwaves indoors
    It's literally not.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    GOD will protect me.
    You lot are fricked tho

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    > muh shelter

    Black person.

    If nukes and radioactivity exist (I assume they do) and there will be an all-out nuclear war, taking shelter will just prolong your suffering.

    No one will survive such an event, as radioactive fallout will spread globally due to atmospheric circulation and pollute the entire planet and therefore finish all life on it.

    And no, no bunker air filter system will be able to keep this shit out in the long run.
    Not even to speak of groundwater / well contamination due to permeating radioactive rainfall.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >groundwater / well contamination due to permeating radioactive rainfall
      *laughs in aquifer*
      haha what a defeatist cuck. my water is 400 fricking feet down and Muricans will survive the big one. suck it eurocucks, you can't imagine wilderness because your homosexual civilization is all connected by trains and shit.
      >muh walkable cities
      we have to drive cars because there's a thousand miles between features over here.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Thats all fake. There is no plan for what to do after a nuke. The military might try to recover some assets, but you’re on your own.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This.

      Just look what they did after the recent train derailment and massive environmental pollution.
      THEY SHAT ON YOU.

      How in the world could anyone remotely sane assume they would act differently in an even worse case.

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    IM GGOING TO STAY OUTSIDE SO I CAN BOARD THE OPHANIM OK I AINT TAKIN NO SHELTER. I AINT HIDIN FROM GOD

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They'll probably come out and say that the covid vaxx will protect you from fallout as well.

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    > oh look another thread with outdated nuke maps

    Imagine not having the updated classified 350 page PDF of all nuclear targets and survival strategies for every city/region in the USA

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      post it then, if you're so clever

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Z

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I have a hard time imagining it would change much. It's not like we're adding a ton of new military bases, nuclear reactors, or population centers. Maybe if the Russians know where our newer DUMBs are located and think they can penetrate them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Post it for Canada. Good maps are impossible to find.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >pretending Canada is threatening enough to be targeted at all
        pretty funny, anon

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          George W. Bush had the U.S. military place missile launchers in Canada, not near the border, inside Canada. Canada has been a vassal state for decades now.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I didn't know that. Kind of funny that Canada gets included in MAD whether they like it or not.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              And they are our hat, with Alaska being our northern chunk of broccoli. It makes sense, I mean, it's be hard to defend America without taking it literally.
              Next up, Meh-hee-co.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Yes, the mutt government has been holding the West hostage since the end of WW2 and still you lot cannot understand why everyone resents you.

              https://i.imgur.com/b4AbvC3.png

              I don't know if you've been around for my occasional threads on the matter. Expect something that resembles the Poseidon, in US waters, but much further south than Florida, and probably not performed by the Russians. The proving grounds are ready and the hour is almost here.

              Good luck convincing your compatriots anything like Poseidon even exists.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I don't have to. It would have been hard convincing them in 2021 but the normie press has been harping on about them an an increasing rate since last year. They're keen to make sure that it's a well enough known variable among the midwit news junkie class beforehand, they'll be the first wave of idiots trying to convince everyone that the blast was indeed Russian.

                https://nypost.com/2022/10/04/putin-may-test-underwater-nuke-150-times-stronger-than-hiroshima-bomb-near-ukrainian-border-report/

                https://www.newsweek.com/poseidon-torpedoes-putin-nuclear-weapon-1774305

                https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/putins-poseidon-and-the-radioactive-tidal-wave-of-death/ar-AA16vPXP

                The hard part would be convincing them that the blast wasn't the work of the Russian state but of the post-nationalists who are looking to pen a carte blanche in Virgin blood.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/79o7nOf.jpg

          eastern canuckia

          Thank you anon!!!! I was busy and glad I got back to express my gratitude before this thread archived. Well done!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        eastern canuckia

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's not like that book is hard to find

      https://library.lol/main/61EB19BE8D886DB54BB0E851A0DFF7FE

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        We should start a book club.

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that food stores the fallout gays were showing off in 2011, either had to be consumed or is now completely worthless

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      People have been prepping since forever, it was a meme in the 80’s when I was a kid

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >doesn’t have food stores that last 50 year

      Ngmi

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You realize you're supposed to rotate through your food supply, right?
      You're not supposed to just buy a bunch of food and sit on it. You eat from it and replace what you eat.

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >t-two more weeks until Putkey launches a nuke!
    lol ok

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Do it already I don’t want to do my English homework

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You have to be a real coward to come up with a weapon design to murder a million civilians in an instant.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No! Not murder, anon. Why, we'd die as martyrs in a War©™

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The pressure wave will blow out your lungs and there's nothing you can do about it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      -in the immediate blast radius, maybe.
      Thanks, anon.

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Rip montana

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i trust picrel.

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Hey look, is that an explosion?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Did they ded?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Camera made it though
      Wrong place at the wrong time.

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How long did it take Japan to no longer have nuclear radiation?
    2 weeks from the blast?

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    hmm

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Pretty sure that the main dangers of a nuke are the immediate blast and the societal breakdown likely to occur afterwards. The radiation itself, barring the use of "salted" weapons, is WAY overhyped.

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    fake and gay

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    might be useful information if nukes were real but their not and their just made up to scare you.

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Don't trust any shelter in place the government tells you because theyll just round you up and off you.
    >Plan Naamah

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Don't worry your israeli cia masters tell you nukes are fake

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sheltering and duck and cover and all that bullshit was just the government's way of trying to calm down any mass pandemonium or panic from the population. In reality, there's nothing you can really do and nowhere to hide if a nuclear weapon is used in your general area (approx. 50 mile diameter blast area). You're going to die, period. That's it. The only way to survive a nuclear bomb is to be as far away from it as possible. If you're within the affected areas of the blast, then your goose is cooked.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >approx. 50 mile diameter blast area
      I'd like to note that it will be better for the enemies of the US, because we use smaller "Tactical" warheads.
      Russia just uses large yields and bigger numbers of them anticipating that they'll be less accurate and have a higher fail rate.

      >no u
      The standard death rattle of the defeated mutt
      I firmly stand by my original point about the objective feasibility of lead and Earth as insulation against radiation. At some point I offended your low wit and you haven't been able to be coherent since.
      >it's too expensive
      >I don't know how
      lol lmao ngmi

      >The standard death rattle of the defeated mutt
      You're literally the one who filled his last post with "Nou"s
      >Earth as insulation
      I never said anything about that at all, I was only talking about your idiocy in thinking you'll be able to make a lead shielded bunker for cheap with scrap.
      You refuse to back up anything you've said or provide any data, you just screech over and over.
      This is beyond leafdom, I think you're just autistic as hell.
      You sound like one of those cringey nerds in highschool that claim to be experts in everything but "Oh man I can't prove it now I'm busy or have some other excuse"

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >no u "no u"!
        >spoonfeed me or ur a nerd
        my fricking sides

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, they killed the daughter of Joe in TLOF.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *