Just Do It Already.

50% of Russia's nukes are unusable. Deteriorated, used for spare parts, unfinished, etc.

50% of nukes left are disassembled, unprepared and would take a year to get to working order. Unusable when it will matter.

50% of nukes left don't have the appropriate delivery systems readied to be used all at once. A month gap in a crisis is effectively unusable.

50% of nukes left will fail to launch due to mutiny. Very few have anything to be patriotic about, willing to destroy Paris or New York if Russia is hit.

50% of nukes left will be intercepted.

50% of nukes left will malfunction in flight or fail to detonate or miss due to poor design or maintenance.

50% of nukes left will be spread all over the globe, ensuring the few cities that are hit will only be hit once and still be able to recover.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder if the "smoking accident" will accidentally explode a nuclear weapon in a major Russian civilian center at some point.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    very M O D E R A T E thread

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Assuming that even 75% of Russians stock pile was unusable that still leaves over 1500 nuclear capable devices. That’s more than enough to strike every pre-selected target in the US and EU more than once. Any one dumb enough to advise the use of nuclear weapons deserves to be castrated.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'm not afraid of dying if it means killing every communist bugman on the planet and sparing the earth from their taint.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >US and EU
      sounds like a deal to me
      do it you russian homosexuals

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I advise the use of nuclear weapons on the Russians in a massive surprise attack so that they DON'T use those 1,500 warheads in their own surprise attack, which honestly, we've been giving them an ever-increasing number of reasons to do so for the past six months.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    There's two type of people advocating for "just starting nuclear war now".
    1) Americans who feel safe because they know half of the shit they trigger is not going to fall on them. "Who gives a shit if some of your allies get glassed lmao".
    2) People who want to die anyways. If that is you, then strap on a suicide vest and do what you must do. Plenty of people have something to live for, even if you don't.
    And not surprisingly to anyone: Both opinions are fricking moronic. A nuclear war will make existence absolutely miserable in ways you can't even imagine.

    God you people are so stupid sometimes.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Coward.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        There's nothing courageous about wanting to die gaygatron.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >There's nothing courageous about wanting to die gaygatron.

          Quiet infidel.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you forgot the third type:
      southern hemisphere people who will barely notice the north missing

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Assuming they'd advocate for such a conflict that would mean they're either ignorant or stupid.
        Even if no nukes hit them directly a nuclear war is going to make everything worse. Much worse. Even for them.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You talk like a tremulous boomer homosexual who is afraid that preemptively striking evil will harm his Zestimate.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I just don't think covering the entire planet in a blanket of radiation is """"totally based"""".

            Judge me.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Does all of your knowledge of nukes and nuclear related phenomena come from Fallout?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              modelling shows the radiological effects would largely be contained to the northern hemisphere.
              I'll keep you in my prayers

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Appeasement is the guaranteed path to ruin. Total overwhelming decapitating nuclear strike followed by a barrage of hellfire rolling from St Petersburg to Vladivostok is the sane, reasonable and humane option to keep this escalating to WWIII and risking 5 billion human lives in global conflict. There can also be no room left for revanchism so NATO deathsquads must do what must be done and drag all the russian surivors out of the metro stations and nuclear bunkers and nail them to burning crosses. We must do what is right and be moral Men in the eyes of God.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I believe posts like these are made by russian trolls so that they can screencap it and show it to russki boys so they believe they’re actually under threat.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I'm a taxpaying NATO citizen, I like living in the western democracies and Id volunteer for the deathsquads.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      3) People who are sick and tired to listening to vatnigs and wumaos talk about how they'll nuke the west any day now and want them to put up or shut up.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I agree anon. Just get it over with. Pretty sure when NATO goes all out with first striking Russia. It's will be over withtin a week.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The extinction of life on the entire northern hemisphere would be a welcomed development. All at once, nature and humanity would be on the path to healing. Once the radiation passes on, it could be re-colonized by those truly worth it to inherit the future.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >kiwis on the coasts of california in hazmat suits
      >australians in the appalachians
      >all food grown in greenhouses
      >an entire industry of just cleaning water, soil etc from radiation then feeding it into domed cities
      >reverse prison ships, sending convicts back to england
      >whatever japanese left bringing machine guns to the junks desperately attempting to land
      >still better than detroit

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >50% of Russia's nukes
    I need anything on that
    >It's russia!
    Something worth of trust to, please

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    just do it

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >50% of nukes left will be spread all over the globe, ensuring the few cities that are hit will only be hit once and still be able to recover.
    Why would I want them to recover?

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Those kinds of explosions happen every five minutes in Ukraine caused by the hohols ass blasts.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *