ive been thinking, we havent seen pic related in the Ukraine war, how come? i know the Ukis have received 40mm grenades and automatic grenades launchers, but not this thing
is it impractical?
ive been thinking, we havent seen pic related in the Ukraine war, how come?
there's been pictures of them floating around in ukraine. I imagine a 203 is better in most circumstances
I think the US dumped so many 203s on them they have better use for the 203 and a better chance of being used in an event that received publicity.
Drones
We've seen multiple videos of them in combat. Well, I have. Watch some more combat video idk.
Yes we have.
You know it's an M32A1 and not a Y2 or clone because it has the VLTOR EMOD stock, the M2A1 sight, and the 8" barrel. The Milkor wiki page lists Ukraine as an end user, with a link to a Facebook video that shows it in detail.
after witnessing this war i believe every man should buy 37mm grenade launchers or build recoilless rifles like those IRA prigs
That 37mm ain't gonna shoot anything useful.
>B...but I'm going to bore it out to 40mm in case of TEOTWAWKI
Without rifling, your grenade isn't going to spin, and therefore isn't going to arm. Also accuracy will be dogshit.
trust me you wont need rifling after you jerry rig your 37mm into a ghetto sturmpistole
I stand corrected. Please load those rounds and shoot them. Make sure to share the results
nice try atf
make sure to get your $200 tax stamp
unless your in a warzone then carry on
also think of those massive honker 37mm buckshot shells you could breach a door and clear the room with one round
>Without rifling, your grenade isn't going to spin, and therefore isn't going to arm
You can easily modify regular 40mm to detonate on impact without a requirement to spin
Chinks need to make volley fire optic mounts like that for $16.
32s are rough because they're heavy (15 lb) there's no good way to carry them on your kit, and they take a fat second to reload, so it's better to just give an extra 203/320 to each fireteam than have to deal with a 32
If you have a grenadier billet on your team, they're definitely nicer for most to shoot than an underbarrel grenade launcher. But only if you can spare a guy for one weapon platform that isn't useful in most cicumstances. Most teams would opt for a machine gunner or an anti armor rocket launcher I would think.
Their best use is for lobbing a fuck load of tear gas rounds at protestors. Otherwise a 203 makes more sense.
>M32A1 recoil is bad
Lol they’re fucking lying. If there’s one silver lining to this gun’s form factor and weight, it’s that the recoil is very mild.
I didn't mean that particular model. Never seen the M32 where I served, to be honest. I was talking about a bunch of various hand-held 40mm launchers we had donated.
Sorry, I mean
as a reply to
Is that the War Machine from Black Ops 2!?! Holy shit its real!!!
Actually I saw a video of it being used, no I will not look for it
Theres been videos of them in use. Idk how many they got, or how effective they really are. I've used them before, and to me they seem like the perfect IDF support for trench assaulting.
I've seen a bunch of them. Dudes who used them said they kick like ass and can even injure you, so despite possible benefits on the squad level no one really wants to shoot it regularly and prefer to take AT4s with them
>ive been thinking, we havent seen pic related in the Ukraine war,
Ther is plenty of vids and pics of them being used in Ukraine. It's more a you problem.