ITT: schizo technology

post examples of schizo technology

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    heavily modernized pre dreadnought battleship

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Zip fuels
    >schizo and autistic

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Don't you know blow forward is a real thing, well at least it kind of works.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Replace the wienerpit with a two ton shaped charge
    >Slap a manned Fw190 on top
    >???

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What in gods name is the intended use case for this? Is it an anti-ship weapon?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >>>
        > Anonymous 05/02/23(Tue)12:26:44 No.58051346▶
        >

        >Replace the wienerpit with a two ton shaped charge
        >Slap a manned Fw190 on top
        >???
        >What in gods name is the intended use case for this? Is it an anti-ship weapon?
        to frick ya mudder in her c**t

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Ships, harbours, any large and sturdy high-value target really.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It was also used against bridges.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      frick ya mudda

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What in gods name is the intended use case for this? Is it an anti-ship weapon?

      >Mistel warhead was a shaped charge weighing nearly two tonnes (the weight of a blockbuster bomb) fitted with a copper or aluminium liner. The use of a shaped charge was expected to allow penetration of up to seven meters of reinforced concrete.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      honorabru sacrifice

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That's a bf 109 moron

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That's clearly a BV138

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The US attempt (Operation Aphrodite) wasn't much more successful
      >take B17
      >rip out most of the interior and bomb racks
      >load it with thousands of pounds of Torpex
      >install TV cameras in the nose
      >install radio receiver and electric motors to operate the controls
      >have two pilots fly it close to the target and then bail out
      >guide the plane's kamikaze run from a second bomber where a crewman watching a TV screen guides the plane remotely
      >blow through millions of dollars developing this shit
      >fly 14 missions
      >frequently use multiple FPV heavy bomber drones
      >shear luck prevents the unintentional bombing of English industrial town
      >accidentally kill well over a dozen pilots including JFK's older brother
      >accidentally kill fighter pilots in supporting aircraft escorting the bomber formations
      >accidentally detonate drone mid-air while still being manually piloted, long before the attack dive
      >never succeed in hitting a single target

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >accidentally detonate drone mid-air
        How?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        given the events of September 11th, and the last twenty years, I’d say this sort of stuff actually ended up working really well for America

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The US attempt (Operation Aphrodite) wasn't much more successful
      >take B17
      >rip out most of the interior and bomb racks
      >load it with thousands of pounds of Torpex
      >install TV cameras in the nose
      >install radio receiver and electric motors to operate the controls
      >have two pilots fly it close to the target and then bail out
      >guide the plane's kamikaze run from a second bomber where a crewman watching a TV screen guides the plane remotely
      >blow through millions of dollars developing this shit
      >fly 14 missions
      >frequently use multiple FPV heavy bomber drones
      >shear luck prevents the unintentional bombing of English industrial town
      >accidentally kill well over a dozen pilots including JFK's older brother
      >accidentally kill fighter pilots in supporting aircraft escorting the bomber formations
      >accidentally detonate drone mid-air while still being manually piloted, long before the attack dive
      >never succeed in hitting a single target

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    A pulse jet powered biplane is perfectly feasible and would be significantly cheaper that a radial engine although that one is at least 2-3x as big as would be needed.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Hitler threatened to bomb New York with u-boat launched hypersonics

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >V-2
      >hypersonic

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >V-2
        >Maximum speed Maximum: 5,760 km/h (3,580 mph)
        >Hypersonic flight is flight through the atmosphere below altitudes of about 90 km at speeds greater than Mach 5
        >Mach 5 is 5400 km/h
        Checkmate, vatnik.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH ME IS A RUSSOID VATNIK BECAUSE... BECAUSE THEY JUST ARE OKAY?
          yeah okay schizo

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            he is joking you worthless moron

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >I'M JUST PRETENDING TO BE moronic, OKAY?
              yeah okay schizo

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Frick off pootnik

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          "Hypersonic something" implies a non-ballistic trajectory, it isn't about speed.
          That aside ruskies likes the hypersonic hype but none of their designs are air-breathers afaik.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            isn't only about speed*

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >"Hypersonic something" implies a non-ballistic trajectory, it isn't about speed.
            which is funny because in strictly technical terms hypersonic precisely refers to speed of the object, like when talking about hypervelocity guns it refers to speed of the projectile

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Ok, so Kentucky rifles are a supersonic weapons. Amirite?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'd personally rather be hit up to few times by 9mm rather than a single musket ball

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes? Why wouldn't you be, their projectiles often move much faster than the speed of sound.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                So the 120mm/125mm guns are hypersonic weapons because they fire hypersonic APDSFS dars.
                ay lmao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Putins finest hypersonic glide missile is a German design from 1940s

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Do you not know what these words mean or something?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypersonic_weapon

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Do you not know what these words mean or something?

                Thanks for saying that no, you dont

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Picrel is self-propelled gun.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This is a tactical ballistic missile.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Also yes. Why are you going out of your way to prove how stupid you are

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >This is a tactical ballistic missile.
                when a Roman general gives orders to his missile troops, what kind of armaments are you imagining they are using?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                A cluster munition.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                First one you've posted so far that just straight up doesn't fit the definition, actually

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >A cluster munition is a form of air-dropped or ground-launched explosive weapon that releases or ejects smaller submunitions.
                A firework is an explosive device which produces a bright flash and a loud noise. If it's not a munition, then neither is a concussive grenade.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                A firework is a pyrotechnic. It's not a weapon, therefore not a munition. A concussive grenade is a weapon. It's designed as a weapon and employed like one. Pyrotechnics are designed asnd employed as pyrotechnics, which are a nice flash and sound

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                my hamburger is a sandwich

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Self propelled means it can move itself, of course. So if you consider the pack horse as part and parcel to the gun then yes, but you and I know that it isn't and it can't be fired this way

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                self-propelled means mobility is built into the actual weapons system, otherwise its just motorized artillery

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >implies a non ballistic trajectory
            How? By definition, hypersonic refers only to speed

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypersonic_weapon

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The first line of that article defies it and makes no mention of trajectory, ballistic or otherwise. Are you one of those homosexuals that thinks a rail gun can only shoot in a straight line or something?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Hypersonic weapons: guided (aka maneuverable + lock on target) at hypersonic speeds.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's not a prerequisite you absolute buffoon, and it doesn't even say that it is. It says there are multiple types, and this is a disambiguation even. Hypersonic refers exclusively to the speed at which it moves, this is a fact

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                So the 120mm (APDSFS) is a hypersonic weapon? AYY LMAO

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Well it's a weapon that moves at hypersonic speed, isn't it?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >So the 120mm (APDSFS) is a hypersonic weapon? AYY LMAO
                what part of this are you not understanding?

                it may dawn on you later that "hypersonic" is a relatively meaningless buzzword no matter what weapon it's being used to describe. "Hypersonic" missiles are literally just fast missiles.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No. Normally n one normally refers to ICBMs, SRBM as hypersonic weapons.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You must be esl

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Off topic.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's apparently the crux of the topic, actually

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ok.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'll try to put it in simpler words for Google translate. "You don't speak English. You don't know what English words mean"

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Ok ok.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                A hypersonic has to be hypersonic for the majority of its flight to be classified as hypersonic. If only because otherwise the Nazis had hypersonic weapons in the V2, every country with ICBMs have hypersonic, and even Congolese warlords have them every time they fire a HEAT round, since the damaging element of those is a hypersonic jet of metal

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Not that they're classified in this way but the only reason not to call them hypersonic is to disambiguate the term.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH ME IS A RUSSOID VATNIK BECAUSE... BECAUSE THEY JUST ARE OKAY?
            yeah okay schizo

            witness the vatnik as it copes and seethes while being deprived of anal sex

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >witness the vatnik as it copes
              ?
              I just said (indirectly) that the Kinzhal isn't a hypersonic weapon.

              The only vatnik missile that would fit in that category is the Zircon and R-37M, but only if they work, none of those are mentioned by spammers in /k/.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                are the*

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >SQUEEEEE VATNIK SQUEEEE
                pic related is mighty russian hypersonic program

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >room temperature IQ

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Stop getting all your information from Perun.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              ?

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >that paint
      >bad lever
      >knockoff acog
      Yeah

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What is the point of the bad levers. They seem like a joke

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is this Crimson Skies fan art? There was so much schizo tech in that game.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it's for some kind of tabletop RPG sorta based on hayao miyazaki films. it seems pretty good but i think the creator is a troon

      https://twitter.com/open_sketchbook/status/1250405554301947906

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Any Blohm und Voss plane from WW2

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      now this is podracing

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    (boldly) assuming it wasn't just a glowie hoax

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Squeeze bores

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2.8_cm_sPzB_41
      >2.8 cm schwere Panzerbüchse 41 (sPzB 41) or "Panzerbüchse 41" was a German anti-tank weapon working on the squeeze bore principle.

      >The squeeze bore design was based on a tapering barrel, with the caliber reducing from 28 mm at the chamber end to only 20 mm at the muzzle. The projectile carried two external flanges; as it proceeded toward the muzzle, the flanges were squeezed down, decreasing the diameter with the result that pressure did not drop off as quickly and the projectile was propelled to a higher velocity. The barrel construction resulted in a very high muzzle velocity - up to 1,400 m/s.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They had a 7.5cm one too

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Big guns (+100T)

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    someone post the flying M113 the furry schizo came up with

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Designed by the military genius and engineer Mike Sparks, who is totally not just a raving literal schizophrenic.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >ywn be an aerogavin door gunner

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Here you are.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >has missiles
        This is definitely not an authentic reformers design

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Dynamite guns.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Translation: Then-unstable high explosive ammunition fired with air compressors. Quiet but low velocity and thus low range.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Thats somehow even worse than what I was expecting

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Translation: Then-unstable high explosive ammunition fired with air compressors. Quiet but low velocity and thus low range.

      They also had powder operated guns to lob dynamite shells at low velocity.
      They used a weird system where a blank round was used to move a giant piston to compress air which was then piped up to the barrel where it propelled the dynamite shell. I suppose this method of operation reduced the kinetic impact on the shell and reduced the G-spikes.

      Teddy Roosevelt and his lads used one of these during the Spanish-American war.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Do NAMMO's Modular screw-together grenades count?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      As a schizo weapon? I wouldn't think so, Bangalores were used in beach landings and were pretty effective. I guess it depends on what you define as a schizo weapon

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, bundled grenades are nothing new.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      of course

      As a schizo weapon? I wouldn't think so, Bangalores were used in beach landings and were pretty effective. I guess it depends on what you define as a schizo weapon

      >If its effective its not schizo

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That plane on the top has the BBC logo
    :^(

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    And anything 40k.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Welcome to my animated web 1.0 page where we will discuss why HVSS is superior to torsion bar suspension. James bond is real.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What was the most successful anti shipping American aircraft of the Pacific theatre?

    avenger?
    b-25?
    maybe even the catalina?

    BTW I'm focusing on victims being merchant and logistic ships rather than directly taking out task forces and carrier ships

    I reckon it is the ju88 for luftwaffe, the beaufighter for the brits (closely tied with beaufighter) and the Japanese? Who fricking knows probably their g3m with torpedos

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *