Isn't about time gunpowder becomes deprecated?

Instead, they use something more powerful like C4.
The bullets could be then a lot smaller and ligther, this would improve logistics by a lot.

Also C4 won't easily explode. Firearms would be a lot safer too.

Would it be possible to make a pistol bullet to be as strong as a rifle bullet? I don't know how stronger C4 is when compared to gunpowder.

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Modern smokeless powder is far more effective than ye olde black powder. Plastic explosive is also useful. To be honest, it is the perfect charge to wrap around a quadcopter.

    As long as the drone can carry the weight on a one way trip, the plastic can be shaped to keep good aerodynamics.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >never touched nor smelled C4

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    C4 has a much higher brisance. You don't actually really want an explosion to propel a projectile so much as you want a deflagrant. Switching to a compound with a faster detonation rate would dramatically increase the necessary strength of a firearm's pressure bearing components, and may also have deleterious effects on external ballistics.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      t. smokeless powder salesman

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >bolt action handle on a semi auto pistol

      wat

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Bolt action pistols are actually great to shoot in small bore CF calibres like the fast 22s, 218 bee etc. Ideal for silhouette

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's for racking the slide, since there's a bigass red dot in the way of that.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Is it a tiny gun or something? Looks like there's plenty of space to pinch the back of the slide.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/9BIYfkU.jpg

      >bolt action handle on a semi auto pistol

      wat

      It's for racking the slide, since there's a bigass red dot in the way of that.

      and its dovetailed into the spot where the rear sight would go.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >all this money put in to the gun
      >still has WARNING: READ MANUAL BEFORE USE and other idiot marks scribbled all over it.
      LMAO

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >t. Big Smokeless

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm a big fan of high energy RDX based propellants but big army moves slow so it'll be another couple of decades of testing and making sure ammo production is scaleable before we'll see it enter US service.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I'm a big fan of high energy RDX based propellants
      Any reading material?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Just slap "high energy RDX based propellants" into google scholar, there is a shitload of well funded research and I haven't kept up to date in the last ~3 years.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Look at the rhenium plated stellite lined 25mm bushmaster barrel testing stuff

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    From a industrial view point, it is much easier to pour a cartridge with a precise amount of powder than to stuff it with dough.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is there no oil or petroleum liquid that ahs the same burn rate and pressure curve as a smokeless substitute?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Propellent, especially rocket, has been put in explosives, and aluminum and other goodies for decades now. Even plasticizer or gelling agent have explosive ones.

      >petroleum
      kerosene or alcohol with prilled AN sounds like a good starting point.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This seems like the firearms equivalent of dudes who show up to sword threads talking about titanium.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But dude you don't get it, the sword would be like, so light but so hard. Like a titanium katana would be unstoppable dude

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >dosen't know about shockwave propagation
    You should use diamond barrels too, because diamond is the strongest metal.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >because diamond is the strongest metal
      Pretty sure that's dragonforce.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, but it's also very heavy. A pound of diamond weighs like two pounds or something.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Powders are getting incrementally better ever year. It's one of the few areas where firearms technology hasn't plateaued.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How? They just manufactured a problem and pretend to fix it.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    just use that swedish plastic explosive thats not toxic so you can eat it
    t. knower

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i had a battle buddy in basic training eat a chunk of c4. he never got sick from it, but i read that c4 is toxic. maybe they gave us swedish plastic explosives knowing some retard would try to eat it?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        we also had some chemlights that were nontoxic. the veebel explained that during the sales pitch the salesman drank the fucking thing to prove its harmless

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Reminding me of that awful pic of the muhrine who chewed on a blasting cap. I think stupid people may be the true source of evil.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fucking retard.

      If you had a diamond barrel or something else far tougher than steel, you'd probably want to use a punchier propellant than traditional powders. Not sure if C4 is the answer though.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fucking retard.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's primitive too, first we're going to electric propulsion like Tesla guns, then direct energy blasters. After that psychic warfare becomes totally dominant.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *