Is Ukraine strong or Russia is just ultra shit tier. ?

Is Ukraine strong or Russia is just ultra shit tier
?
Like if the US/UK/France invaded Ukraine, would they be able to curbstomp them or it will end up in similar situation like russia ?

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The US would curbstomp them. The UK and France are not able to invade and fight such a high intensity war alone.
    If it's the three together? They would be in Kiev in 1 day.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You sound angry anon, maybe a snack will cheer you up

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That didnt take long

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >dedovshchina, when the bombs fell

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    kys 4chanchud

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >muh 4chan
      I never saw any chud shit posted on 4chan that wasn’t making fun of chuds or was intended as a troll thread. It’s ironic considering the rest of PrepHole is overrun with chud threads. I’m not in any way endorsing ~~*Russia*~~ or the Vatniks but you’re projecting.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        What is it? 90% of all online interactions surrounding trannies are done by facebook moms and qanon "right wing" larpers. Nobody gives a shit but you people so yeah keep giving it attention and secretly jacking off to it cletus

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >secretly
          it's only a secret to their own denial at this point
          it's all very obvious

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Dude its the Kiwifarms complex, they gotta constantly talk about trannies all the time to cope for something lacking in their life, If Freud was alive today, there would 100% be a complex involving people like on 4chan and their obsession with trannies, like how all the evangelicals that are super anti-gay end up being gay in the closet and/or child molesters

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Usually I'd call this a fake/false flag but honestly I've been wrong enough times recently...

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Peter the Great ruined trans rights
      Fun fact before Peter the Great wife beating wasn’t just acceptable, it was socially expected to the point where men would gift their son-in-laws a whip on their wedding day.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Wait you forgot gnomish, don't you usually add that too?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      He forgot Nazi as well.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    There is literally zero LGBT in the ukrainian army meanwhile russian army has countless exemples
    >globohomo
    Russia/USSR invented globohomo
    Ukrainians are fighting for their lands/homes/family

    >chud
    No im a man

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Okay I will be nice
    Ukraine in 2014 was a joke army like the Russians, since then they have received a lot of NATO training and equipment which 8 months ago was put in to overdrive, they also had a defenders advantage which stopped them getting rolled completely and bought time to get their shit together. Most peoples would fare well under NATOs wing except for literal third worlders as we saw in Afghanistan, I imagine glowies are actually happy to have some competent triple digit IQ people under their fucking wing for once

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Both

      But would US/UK/France be able to completely defeat/conquer them ?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Consider your question
        UK and France assuming they each work alone, with their current army no they are too small, they could however bombard the shit out of them without many boots on the ground. The problem with your question is you have to consider motivations, ability to galvanise the masses etc
        US can unironically roll anyone
        >t: Brit

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        No to the latter two because their navies are small, if they can stage from Poland than yes. If NATO for example invaded Ukraine the bulk of the ground war would have taken maybe a month.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I imagine glowies are actually happy to have some competent triple digit IQ people under their fucking wing for once
      They probably are ecstatic to handle a highly motivated mass of men that aren't in it just for the dollars this time

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Both

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    look at mutts seething, it's too easy
    maybe try to make your country what it used to be 60 years ago, fat chance but who knows, better than continuing in your moron worshipping ways?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      look at vatnik mutts seething, it's too easy
      maybe try to make your country what it used to be 350 years ago, fat chance but who knows, better than continuing in your churka/garden gnome/turko mongol worshipping ways?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >yes, but muh vatniks
        I don't care to disagree about them, glad we're in full agreement

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Both.

    Dedicated reforming Ukraine met declining dumbass Russia.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Well if the US/UK/France invaded them they wouldn't be getting training, intel, and arms from the west would they?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >intels/training
      Of course
      >gear/arms
      They will just keep it

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    All three working together? Against just Ukraine? Short war, but judging by the heart Ukraine has shown so far in this conflict a very long insurgency. With of course the US doing most of the occupying and the entire world making them out to be the bumbling Tom to Ukraine's plucky heroic Jerry

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The US would dismantle Ukraine's military but judging by the balls they've shown after 7 months I'd be worried about an insurgency.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Right. I suspect it'd be another conflict the US military would ""lose"" after 10+ years because the locals never fell in line no matter what happened, and the entire world got tired of hearing about it.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    No one is weak, it's just that the US weaponry is OP as fuck. There's literally no counter to the Javelin or Stinger, Russian tanks could wear another tank atop the turret and the javelin would still one shot both.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Ballistic Missile Arm the decisive military branch in doctrine
    >everything else designed and planned for around ethnically cleansing and occupying glass
    Take a low trust society and system, and throw in the Military being shunted out of the Iron Triangle of Soviet Party-Security-Military, and this is what you get.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine is a middling local power at best, you wouldn't expect them to be able to readily invade, say, Hungary or Romania or Bulgaria or Turkey. It's just that Russia is so monumentally mismanaged, a complete disaster of a state, a spectacle of failure hitherto unknown, that Ukrainians are doing so well against them. This revelation has been a long time coming for all the westerners who bought the Russiastronk meme after a century of soviet and post-soviet propaganda, but the illusion is finally being dispelled - Russia is Nigeria with snow.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    nice organic thread

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Vietnam War demonstrated that simply supplying training and equipment to a country will not form an effective army. Ukraine has demonstrated that, although undeniably corrupt by western standards, there is a political backbone from which the body of an army can be formed.

    Although Ukraine has been heavily dependant on Western aid, it cannot be denied that there was a strong foundation there to begin with.

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine is Russia minus widespread corruption with a decently trained and motivated officer corps with some western weapons foe support.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine would collapse within the first week of the US invading. People keep forgetting the US fought on three fronts in WW2 ALL WHILE SUPPLYING MORE THAN 50% SUPPLIES for everyone in their faction.

    The US in a war mode will shit on any nation it goes to war.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah but they're also relying heavily on US equipment, so it's not a parallel comparison. If they had to fight US but still somehow get US equipment, would be a better one.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Three fronts in the same time
      Western Europe, Pacific, Italy ?
      When they were in africa they only had two fronts

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    They're being funded by half the western world, the fact that they haven't won yet says alot

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *