Gun control or lack there of in terms of its implementation is not explicitly political because regardless of what ever political party controls your state you can still buy a gun.
Yeah. I've done the math a couple of times based off the UCR (which is admittedly non-exhaustive), and even if you assume every murder is committed by a different firearm owned by a different person something like 0.02% of firearms are involved in crimes.
bro, there are like 10k annual murders and minimum 300 million firearms in the US. That comes out 0.00333... % firearms involved out of the total. Don't need any fancy stats to work that out.
dude makes a living off of picking out social threads that make 40 something white dudes angry. and business is probably good, they are a fickle set of entitled gays. i think a fair criticism of stonetoss is taking a basic premise found commonly on facebook, going one additional step, and filling it with colors. that's his career. it could be said that he has cornered the industry in high-school educated truck owners between 35 and 55, in the 2 and 4 pane cartoon category
I liked him until I got into a personal argument where he tried saying that IR spectroscopy can't possibly work, at which point I realized if he's retarded about the things I understand he's probably retarded about everything else too.
He doesn't think we've ever gone to Mars or that we can possibly know what Mars is made of from a distance because we don't understand the quantum physics behind causes IR spectroscopy to work. His argument was something like >we can't recreate X from theory >therefore we can't assume Y over there is the same result as Y here
Very dumb.
The whole "93% are peaceful" is such a dumb argument; it doesn't matter if 93% are peaceful if the other 7% of protesters always show up with the "peaceful" crowd.
What a great thread about weapons you fucking waste of bandwith
Please go back to pol with your shitskin friends
>Post on k about the gun argument in USA
>"ACTUALLY IT ISN'T RELATED BECAUSE I DON'T AGREE WITH WHAT IT'S SAYING"
Shut up gaylord
threads about american gun laws are explicitly not allowed on PrepHole
They're also not explicitly unallowed according to the very source you posted
>Do not post threads about gun control. They belong on 4chan.
quite clear I would say
Gun control or lack there of in terms of its implementation is not explicitly political because regardless of what ever political party controls your state you can still buy a gun.
rip ukraini thread 🙁 we need 18 more ukraini threads to make up for the one lost
Go back, bunkermoron
So true who cares about weapons xister we need more pisskraine threads
We lost another slava ukraine thread bros 🙁
post guns
Yes kyle was good example of what happens when you fuck with whites outside of cities
True
uh kyle is hispanic
If we're being technical, hispanics can be white, it just means they come from a Spanish speaking background.
Yeah. I've done the math a couple of times based off the UCR (which is admittedly non-exhaustive), and even if you assume every murder is committed by a different firearm owned by a different person something like 0.02% of firearms are involved in crimes.
bro, there are like 10k annual murders and minimum 300 million firearms in the US. That comes out 0.00333... % firearms involved out of the total. Don't need any fancy stats to work that out.
dude makes a living off of picking out social threads that make 40 something white dudes angry. and business is probably good, they are a fickle set of entitled gays. i think a fair criticism of stonetoss is taking a basic premise found commonly on facebook, going one additional step, and filling it with colors. that's his career. it could be said that he has cornered the industry in high-school educated truck owners between 35 and 55, in the 2 and 4 pane cartoon category
Couldn't have worded it better. Even when he's brilliant, his crowd smells like F-250 owners wearing with plaid shirts wearing Oakleys.
real bunkergay hours
I liked him until I got into a personal argument where he tried saying that IR spectroscopy can't possibly work, at which point I realized if he's retarded about the things I understand he's probably retarded about everything else too.
>he tried saying that IR spectroscopy can't possibly work
That's oddly specific. Now I'm curious: what was the context of that statement?
He doesn't think we've ever gone to Mars or that we can possibly know what Mars is made of from a distance because we don't understand the quantum physics behind causes IR spectroscopy to work. His argument was something like
>we can't recreate X from theory
>therefore we can't assume Y over there is the same result as Y here
Very dumb.
>agrees with 2A in one comic
>shills for CCP in another
Never understood Toss
Dude did crypto bullshit. HE'S A FUCKING GRIFTER.
gotcha merchant
It can't be!
Marge
The whole "93% are peaceful" is such a dumb argument; it doesn't matter if 93% are peaceful if the other 7% of protesters always show up with the "peaceful" crowd.
It doesn't matter if 0% is peaceful, they're utilizing their 1A right to protest, it's Walmart's fault for not hiring better security
Tell that to Judge after you get arrested by the local department for rioting.