I don't think there are any civilian aircrafts flying over Ukraine
Naive newfags, they are going to shoot down a couple of civilian aircraft over Belarus and Russia and blame it on the evil NATO supplying Ukraine with missiles too advanced for the ukrop mind to handle.
Generate outrage about perfidious Albion prolonging the war and causing civilian casualties. Indians ate that shit up in WW2, they will lap it up this time as well.
Thirdie aircraft are forbidden form flying anywhere near the front. Just like all other civvies. The russkies can try a retarded flase-flag, but nobody relevant is going to believe them for a microsecond.
Did you read that anons post you mentally defective vatnik? He said the orks will shoot down a Belarusian flight, or one of the other bordering nations.
>Is this legal?
If legit, absolutely not.
If the UAV is partaking in combat though observation and recon or actively engaging with the enemy in combat, it is 100% illegal for it to try and disguise itself as civilian equipment.
No, it's not legal. It's literally a war crime to LARP military assets as civilian.
On the other hand, this means everyone else now knows that ANYTHING coming from vatmoronstan is a fair target. So, pretty genius move. Nobody has to waste time trying to distinguish "civilian" from "military" vatmoron shit ... just waste it all.
I applaud the acceleration of violence and the extinction of the vatmoron cancer.
Since when did orks care about that ? Ukrainians will shoot down anything that comes from Russia anyway so it would be useless. My bet is that they will use it for shitty false flag operations like they are known for.
Famous example:
https://www.history.com/news/how-the-sinking-of-lusitania-changed-wwi
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Lusitania-British-ship
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_the_RMS_Lusitania
Just because Germany lost the war didn't make them wrong when they put nearly 200 tons of ammunition on the bottom of the ocean. Hiding it in a civilian ocean liner was an outrage at the time when it was only an allegation and suspected. Since then it's been confirmed. Just a few too many years too late to help Germany out. If it had been confirmed at the time, heads would have rolled and the course of the entire war could have been changed. Public opinion would have been seriously impacted.
If there was 200 tons of amunition , the explosion would ripp her in half, rather than takin 18 minues to sink.
Also, since when kraut kaptains are are psychic fortunetellers, able to accurately guess contents of poassenger liner cargo holds by virtue of their third eye?
>Also, since when kraut kaptains are are psychic fortunetellers, able to accurately guess contents of poassenger liner cargo holds by virtue of their third eye?
It probably helps having your spies in every port your enemy owns that watch everything getting loaded and offloaded. Since before WW1 you could find German 'artists' all over Europe, known particularly for favoring making paintings and drawings of ports and other militarily valuable places. A huge number of large crates of munitions would not have gone unnoticed. In the case of Lusitania the Germans actually warned the shipping company and passengers IN PUBLIC not to bring those munitions to Europe. Guess someone wanted shit to happen, right?
Read the links, fuckwit. People have confirmed the ammo dump sitting in the hulk of the Lusitania.
Also, the point wasn't the fact that the Lusitania was carrying ammo, it was the outrage that ammo was being transported on a civilian ship. It was one of the biggest scandals of the time: not that anyone could confirm it then, just the possibility that it *might* have happened.
The fact that it's been confirmed since then is irrelevant. The result is that international agreements and conventions were created afterward based exactly upon that specific incident. The reason that it's illegal today to disguise military equipment as civilian is (in large part) BECAUSE of the Lusitania.
Himars is already made to look like a simple GRAD rocket on radar, to avoid attempted interception (not worth wasting an s-300 on a cheap GRAD rocket). This isn't much different. Just requires retraining and more attention to detail for the defender.
It is only illegal if they lose. If the winning team does it it’s a necessity of war. If the losing team dies it they’re savage animals with no regard for themselves or others
This is beyond retarded considering no one is flying civilian aircraft over a active warzone, so Ukrainians would just need to look for civilian transponder signals to track Russian drones.
a cherry picker?
I don't think there are any civilian aircrafts flying over Ukraine
Wouldn't work on Russia
Where exactly are they going to use it? Civilian aircraft haven't flown over eastern ukraine in almost a year and a half.
Naive newfags, they are going to shoot down a couple of civilian aircraft over Belarus and Russia and blame it on the evil NATO supplying Ukraine with missiles too advanced for the ukrop mind to handle.
>implying the west will care about dead r*ssians
poor naive third worlder
>r*ssians
you are a retard
>r*ssians
It won't be a russian aircraft, anon
yes it will be HATO special tran(ny)sport transporting 88 Z-elensky biolab clones
It won't be a Russian plane.
Generate outrage about perfidious Albion prolonging the war and causing civilian casualties. Indians ate that shit up in WW2, they will lap it up this time as well.
And what this will achieve?
And putin then does what when he shoots down russian civil aviation crafts?
Enlighten me, please.
Bomb Belgorod as retaliation
Whose civilian aircraft? No western airline services flights to or from Russia anymore, dipshit.
thirdie aircraft
Thirdie aircraft are forbidden form flying anywhere near the front. Just like all other civvies. The russkies can try a retarded flase-flag, but nobody relevant is going to believe them for a microsecond.
Did you read that anons post you mentally defective vatnik? He said the orks will shoot down a Belarusian flight, or one of the other bordering nations.
that's not how air defense works
They're gonna blow up a civilian aircraft and claim Ukraine did it. Mark my words, that's how russians roll.
Days since Russians tried not to kill and endanger civilians
>0 days
What have civilians ever done for us?
Pretty sure disguising a military craft as a civilian craft is highly illegal.
It falls under the definition of perfidy within the Geneva conventions: feigning to be a non-combattant under protected status.
Well Mr. Officer, arrest them then.
this is definitely fake
>definitely
Show your work to the entire class so that we can all laugh at what a failure (You) are.
I will make it legal.
My thoughts as well
>Is this legal?
If legit, absolutely not.
If the UAV is partaking in combat though observation and recon or actively engaging with the enemy in combat, it is 100% illegal for it to try and disguise itself as civilian equipment.
Perfidy.
No, it's not legal. It's literally a war crime to LARP military assets as civilian.
On the other hand, this means everyone else now knows that ANYTHING coming from vatmoronstan is a fair target. So, pretty genius move. Nobody has to waste time trying to distinguish "civilian" from "military" vatmoron shit ... just waste it all.
I applaud the acceleration of violence and the extinction of the vatmoron cancer.
>trollstoy
yeah
>Is this legal?
Since when did orks care about that ? Ukrainians will shoot down anything that comes from Russia anyway so it would be useless. My bet is that they will use it for shitty false flag operations like they are known for.
Civilian aircrafts broadcasts its position continuously.
Ukraine is a no-fly. Are they retarded? or am I wrong?
>legal?
No. Not for well over a century.
Famous example:
https://www.history.com/news/how-the-sinking-of-lusitania-changed-wwi
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Lusitania-British-ship
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_the_RMS_Lusitania
Just because Germany lost the war didn't make them wrong when they put nearly 200 tons of ammunition on the bottom of the ocean. Hiding it in a civilian ocean liner was an outrage at the time when it was only an allegation and suspected. Since then it's been confirmed. Just a few too many years too late to help Germany out. If it had been confirmed at the time, heads would have rolled and the course of the entire war could have been changed. Public opinion would have been seriously impacted.
If there was 200 tons of amunition , the explosion would ripp her in half, rather than takin 18 minues to sink.
Also, since when kraut kaptains are are psychic fortunetellers, able to accurately guess contents of poassenger liner cargo holds by virtue of their third eye?
>Also, since when kraut kaptains are are psychic fortunetellers, able to accurately guess contents of poassenger liner cargo holds by virtue of their third eye?
It probably helps having your spies in every port your enemy owns that watch everything getting loaded and offloaded. Since before WW1 you could find German 'artists' all over Europe, known particularly for favoring making paintings and drawings of ports and other militarily valuable places. A huge number of large crates of munitions would not have gone unnoticed. In the case of Lusitania the Germans actually warned the shipping company and passengers IN PUBLIC not to bring those munitions to Europe. Guess someone wanted shit to happen, right?
>germanic artists as intelligence network
Read the links, fuckwit. People have confirmed the ammo dump sitting in the hulk of the Lusitania.
Also, the point wasn't the fact that the Lusitania was carrying ammo, it was the outrage that ammo was being transported on a civilian ship. It was one of the biggest scandals of the time: not that anyone could confirm it then, just the possibility that it *might* have happened.
The fact that it's been confirmed since then is irrelevant. The result is that international agreements and conventions were created afterward based exactly upon that specific incident. The reason that it's illegal today to disguise military equipment as civilian is (in large part) BECAUSE of the Lusitania.
So that means it wasn't illegal at the time. Just highly immoral.
It killed a bunch of US civilians. That was very much illegal.
>blows up the wreckage for no reason.
That's a bit silly, civilian aircraft haven't been flying anywhere near Ukraine for well over a year now.
>Vladimir, our radar is picking up 30 passenger planes on their way to kyiv in a close formation, all incoming from russia
No, this isn't sus at all
Himars is already made to look like a simple GRAD rocket on radar, to avoid attempted interception (not worth wasting an s-300 on a cheap GRAD rocket). This isn't much different. Just requires retraining and more attention to detail for the defender.
>unique device
100% they just ripped a transponder out of a civilian aircraft and put it in their drones
There are no civilian aircraft flying over Ukraine.
It's super illegal.
It's so illegal even your allies would go "WTF are you doing?!"
What civilian aircraft are flying in Ukraine?
This is a Corvus, it's a device for boarding enemy ships. They've gone back to ancient times due to such a harsh lack of equipment.
It is only illegal if they lose. If the winning team does it it’s a necessity of war. If the losing team dies it they’re savage animals with no regard for themselves or others
Yeah Ukies are going to believe that is a 787 flying at 50 metres going 150 km/h
This is beyond retarded considering no one is flying civilian aircraft over a active warzone, so Ukrainians would just need to look for civilian transponder signals to track Russian drones.