Is the Bradley the most effective and survivable tank ever made?

How does 25mm direct fire shit on 120mm direct fire in all scenarios?
It also seems that the Bradley is the only thing on the battlefield(in ukraine) that performs how it was designed for originally.
post bradley kino pls

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >tank
    no

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      explain why its not a tank without using your cuck ifv terms
      armoured. cannon. tracked. tank.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >explain it to me like I'm moronic, because I am
        nope. not gunna do it

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Main gun is less than 100mm

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Whats this then.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            A relic from a bygone age. Definitions change, moron.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            A tank,

            a tank is an tracked vehicle armed with a direct fire gun capable of penetrating any target on the battlefield other than possibly another tank from any angle and armored enough to withstand the same hit. This usually means it doesn't have enough mass left for a troop compartment

            is the correct answer.

            A relic from a bygone age. Definitions change, moron.

            Don't be a dipstick, it is defined by concept and general characteristics (not as broad and moronic as the OP though), not 99mm vs 101mm cannon

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          That is not a defining factor on what makes a tank.
          Remember the Mark II? All it had was a machine gun on the female model, and a 75 mm sponson gun on the male model.
          Tank means tracked armored vehicle, simple as.
          Not armored? It's a tractor.
          Not tracked? It's probably still a tank.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            YOU'RE a tank.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Pretty much every Western MBT is more survivable

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Survivable, but more likely to be targeted by heavier armament, so is it really any more survivable at the end of the day? (yes, but still)

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Bradleys are going to be targeted with the exact same weapons as an MBT would be.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        a tank is an tracked vehicle armed with a direct fire gun capable of penetrating any target on the battlefield other than possibly another tank from any angle and armored enough to withstand the same hit. This usually means it doesn't have enough mass left for a troop compartment

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          That's an entirely arbitrary definition.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Because it's an IFV and only certified braindead troony cucks are so delusional as to think that there is no such thing. Deal with it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >explain it to me without using the definition that explains why it isn't

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Definitions are arbitrary. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_IX_tank

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      (You) equate "tank" with MBTs. For 50 years, this is true but it like saying a Burke is not a warship because it is not a Battleship. The MBT is a type of tank. So is the Bradley.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >this is true but it like saying a Burke is not a warship because it is not a Battleship
        warship is a broad term comparable to AFV
        tank is a specific term, comparable to battleship

        a burke is a warship, but not a battleship,and is a destroyer
        a bradley is an AFV, but not a tank, but is an IFV

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He who kills the most tank, is tank.
      The Bradley has killed many tanks, so it is now a tank.
      Whatever it was called before does not matter.
      Through the sheer perseverance of destroying other tanks it has transcended into a new designation, and has secured its seat in tank Valhalla.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Mines, ATGMs, FPV drones and artillery are tanks now?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >He who kills the most tank, is tank.
        Artillery aren’t tanks

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's not a tank. The Ukrainians have a lot of them compared to their western tanks and it does QRF really well. The Bradley and the Abrams complement each other and are better together then alone.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      abrams
      >based on a tank designed 80 years ago
      >blowout panels on top because it has a losers mentality
      >pulled out of frontline service in ukraine so they dont have to wear a copecage in shame being a failure in tank design
      >never seen a video of bradley and abrams together in ukraine
      i think two bradlets are better together than alone.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        https://desuarchive.org/k/search/filename/dzabtaommrf51.png/
        you seem particularly unhinged tonight. may you should go to bed early instead of having an autistic fix

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          i win

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            here's your prize

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It has changed and adapted to meet changing threats right guys?
        Guys?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          When you put it into perspective like this it does make the tank of today seem disgusting.

          But on the + the challenger is a great tank... it just needs a 30mm, autoloader, drone operator, and indirect fire weapon like a mortar or 40mm gmg for drone operator then itll become the greatest tank!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            how do u fit allat

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        the optimal ratio for offensive units is 2 abrams to 1 brad
        the optimal ratio for defensive units is 2 brads to 1 abrams

        this is literally how US ABCTs are organized, with armor and mech infantry only existing in combat teams of both units
        and they actually have 5 tank companies to 4 mech infantry companies, as they favor offensive maneuver over defensive ones as the latter is terrain dependent

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    take your meds fartsniffer

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    900 rounds, 200 rpm
    Nothing can suppress infantry like it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      rhetorical qufestion thread which dies quickly because it states something that cant be argued with

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        yup meet the future of kino

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why do MBT's suck? Why do tanks still use a coaxial machine gun?!
    So outdated

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Tanks are wild when you think about it. A giant hunk of slow moving iron made to obliterate people.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >survivable
    Given how many have been destroyed, no not really.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nah, CV90 is better. M2 > BMPs of all types though.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Unhinged

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    JUST LIE!
    Repeat the lie often enough and someone will believe it!
    Is it not, Putin slave?
    It doesn't matter what's true or right. Just have to control the narrative, right?

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's not a tank, poindexter.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >another warriortard thread made after he took another L
    Yeah

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nope, challenger 2 is.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >It also seems that the Bradley is the only thing on the battlefield(in ukraine) that performs how it was designed for originally.
    Its not being used how it was designed. Quite the contrary.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >implying this isn't another warriortard thread
    >implying this thread isn't filled with his dumb samegays and baits
    Yeah

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    [...]

    >[ ] ignore it since the comment is not wrong
    >[x] actually make it worse by pouring fuel into the fire by acting like an unhinged schizo that acts like a certain tard
    You never meant to actually improve the situation, do you?

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    >You are shitting up the fricking board with this trash!
    The only one actually doing this right now is you.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What is it about the British and IFVs that attract such autistic rage?

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I got a sincere questions for you:
    Does your "you are all worse than warriortard" headcanon incorporate the horrendous amounts of false flags warriortard produces every time he gets called out or banned too much for his taste? You also seem to lack the most basic knowledge of what he does when you look at this thread and don't at least raise an eyebrow.

    People like you are the actual reason he has such an easy game and you are only making it worse for everyone. I'm not your enemy and you are currently barking at the wrong tree and you do so because you got tricked.

    We all already know what is coming next: You don't care, everyone is just mad and more evasive replies just so we don't actually look at the situation objectively. This is just emotional derailing.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why would i stop, you are clearly fooled into doing things that are bad for this board and you are objectively ignoring your own advices and concepts.

    We are only in this situation, because you fed warriortards shit he keeps spams every day so someone like you picks it up and does his dirty work for him.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    There is no myth, warriortard comes here every day, makes these dumb threads and shits up the board, and no amount of you sticking your head in the sand is gonna make this go away. Why do you think he shills so hard he's not real? Because it makes it easier for him, it is that simple. It is so much harder for him to get away with everything when everyone knows what and how much he is doing.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Rationalization is the practice of attempting to use reasoning to minimize the severity of an incident, or avoid approaching it in ways that could cause psychological trauma or stress.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    we see more bradley footage because its an APC and most of the fighting is being done in rural areas, no one wants to march for fricking miles on open terrain

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >that performs how it was designed for originally.

    50% losses?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      all according to plan

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      id say a good 30% of those losses were from minefields, also are you factoring how many were recovered and repaired?

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Shitskins really dont like the Bratley, do they?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No they don't. Is it surprising that the United Saamraajy shills get pissed?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Sorry, "United Saamraajy"?
        This is my first tume seeing this.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          https://hi.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%AF%E0%A5%82%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%87%E0%A4%9F%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%A1_%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%97%E0%A4%A1%E0%A4%AE

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      God the Bradley is so practical.

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Russia is using stuff the Bradley was designed with in mind.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *