If the us had picrel(Fast Giant lizard, that is highly resistant to damage, can shred humans, and knock cars over).

If the us had picrel(Fast Giant lizard, that is highly resistant to damage, can shred humans, and knock cars over).
How would it have employed it durying the vietnam war or durying the middle east(TM)

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    For me to copulate with

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Join the army to receive your federally issued lizard-mommy
      >Volunteers are endless for the rest of time

      This^
      Deathclaw is for sex
      >Each platoon gets their own designated breeding Deathclaw
      >As part of their training each soldier will take turns bonding with their Deathclaw coitally
      >Troop morale kept at an all time high through regular bonding sessions
      >Now everyone has a big lizard mommy/daddy who will protect them

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I thought you coomers were all hooked in to ChatGPT constantly by now

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          What, and waste all this unbridled horny energy on an unfeeling machine?
          Nah, I ain't letting the robots take me yet.
          Giant scary lizard monsters however... <3 ^-^ <3

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Drop a bunch of them in Laos in proximity to the Ho Chi Minh trail. Claim it was an accident.

      Send this one to Horny Jail. Along with That deathclaw.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Deploying something like that to Asia guarantees your enemy will never starve.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I dont know how to tell you this but causing enemy casualties was never a concern in either of those wars.
    We killed ten men for every one we lost. It literally doesn't matter how good you are at killing combatants when you're unwilling to conquer and equally unwilling to leave a country once you've destroyed it's infrastructure.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >We killed ten men for every one we lost. It literally doesn't matter how good you are at killing combatants when you're unwilling to conquer and equally unwilling to leave a country once you've destroyed it's infrastructure.

      Approved.
      The problem of the USA never was that its opponents were too strong.
      It was that, given the firepower available, the USA were too kind.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >greentext
        >skips space
        >regular text
        Go the frick back.
        >Approved.
        Nobody needs or wants your approval you stupid son of a b***h. Can't stand wienersucking homosexuals like you. GO BACK.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >the USA were too kind.
        It's not really a matter of kindness, so much as a mental virus that has dominated the West for some time now.

        See, there are only two types of victory in war, only these two ever in the past, and ever in the future: Total conquest, and Rapid campaigns of destruction. Essentially, you either subjugate (or remove) a population and bring your own people in to live where they once lived, or you come in, defeat their armies, damage their infrastructure so they cannot easily retaliate, and leave as fast as possible. Everything else is an insane fantasy.

        The west "decided" that there would be no more "conquest" anywhere around the world, no more real conquest, but a little later also decided that purely punitive wars where the survivors are left to starve and scrap in misery were also not to be "allowed".
        Thus the only kind of war "permitted" has no win condition. You're not allowed to take over, push the natives out and bring your people in, but you're also not allowed to come in, demolish everything, and leave.

        For our "enlightened modern sensibilities" war is the practice of coming into a country, defeating it's armies, then milling around in said country for a nonspecific amount of time while you wait for the natives to spontaneously erupt into western values and democracy. Realistically this means spending the GDP of a medium sized nation for ten years until you get tired and leave, having accomplished absolutely nothing of meaning.

        This "kind" sensibility of war has not prevented war to any measurable degree (and in fact may have dramatically increased it), it has only prevented victory.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          What do you think every other country in the world would do if they see the USA going around murdering and glassing every nation one by one? That's a one way ticket to get every nation on earth to band together against the USA. And unless you're mentally ill/low IQ, you understand that is an unwinnable situation.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >What do you think every other country in the world would do if they see the USA going around murdering and glassing every nation one by one?
            Cry, sit on their dildos and cry.

            >you understand that is an unwinnable situation.
            LOOOOOL
            Post your gun with timestamp.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Most of the other countries of already hate the US, but we're also more heavily armed than almost all of them combined, and a lot of them are reliant on the US for their weapons anyway. So they couldn't really do much about it even if they wanted too. Especially not if we've already wiped a few of them out in this scenario.

            Why they wouldn't just start nuking us if things got to that bad, idk. Maybe they did and that's why we have deathclaws now.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I didnt ask hoe it woukd go, but how would they have deployed giant lizards

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        They wouldn't have even if they had them, because they'd be impossible to keep track of and there'd be constant friendly fire incidents, not to mention even MORE negative press.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Can we sedate it ?
        If not, then to deploy it is going to be more of a pain than the potential advantages.

        Still, if some general insists on it :

        If the beasts are growing fast enough, then getting young ones rather than fully grown specimen might be easier and useful.

        If they take too much time to grow, I guess we could lure a few adult specimen in resistant enough vaults, then load it on a ship somehow and then bring it to a secluded place for breeding.

        From there, using a ship to bring some specimen to Vietnam or Irak is possible.
        If we managed to capture them and ship them to a camp, then deploying them in the general region of conflict sn't the issue.

        Deploying them right on the battlefield might be trickier.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >We killed ten men for every one we lost
      Everyone conveniently ignores the 1 million allied deaths when factoring in US k/d ratio.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >when factoring in US k/d ratio.
        I literally dont care how fricking terrible non American "allies" are at war.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >How would it have employed it durying the vietnam war or durying the middle east(TM)
      As a recruitment gig of fricking course.
      >Complete four tours to get one night with a pair of big lizard mommies/daddies.

      >Join the army to receive your federally issued lizard-mommy
      >Volunteers are endless for the rest of time

      The Frontier modders have gone too far.

      >the USA were too kind.
      It's not really a matter of kindness, so much as a mental virus that has dominated the West for some time now.

      See, there are only two types of victory in war, only these two ever in the past, and ever in the future: Total conquest, and Rapid campaigns of destruction. Essentially, you either subjugate (or remove) a population and bring your own people in to live where they once lived, or you come in, defeat their armies, damage their infrastructure so they cannot easily retaliate, and leave as fast as possible. Everything else is an insane fantasy.

      The west "decided" that there would be no more "conquest" anywhere around the world, no more real conquest, but a little later also decided that purely punitive wars where the survivors are left to starve and scrap in misery were also not to be "allowed".
      Thus the only kind of war "permitted" has no win condition. You're not allowed to take over, push the natives out and bring your people in, but you're also not allowed to come in, demolish everything, and leave.

      For our "enlightened modern sensibilities" war is the practice of coming into a country, defeating it's armies, then milling around in said country for a nonspecific amount of time while you wait for the natives to spontaneously erupt into western values and democracy. Realistically this means spending the GDP of a medium sized nation for ten years until you get tired and leave, having accomplished absolutely nothing of meaning.

      This "kind" sensibility of war has not prevented war to any measurable degree (and in fact may have dramatically increased it), it has only prevented victory.

      Sums things up pretty well.

      Fallout tech is hardly consistent or reliable. It's going to be hell keeping these things from eating friendlies or wandering into mine fields.

      What's the point?

      Rule of cool.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The Frontier modders?

        It only ever requires ONE MAN.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Let's talk about eventual cryptids, when the US forces bombed the shit out of a patch of forest to erase a surviving missing link in human evolution that would have caused a big big ethical problem to the world in terms of "racism" and the concept of human.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's the same game plan as any mindless organic weapon like the Resident Evil series loves so much. Drop a bunch of them on or near enemy encampments and watch them kill shit. Just like Resident Evil's BOWs, this would likely have the unintended consequence of them wandering onto your side and killing your own dudes.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      What if the us had the mind control tech of the enclave for Big lizards?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Fallout tech is hardly consistent or reliable. It's going to be hell keeping these things from eating friendlies or wandering into mine fields.

        What's the point?

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How would it have employed it durying the vietnam war or durying the middle east(TM)
    As a recruitment gig of fricking course.
    >Complete four tours to get one night with a pair of big lizard mommies/daddies.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Join the army to receive your federally issued lizard-mommy
      >Volunteers are endless for the rest of time

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Deathclaws aren't even rifle-proof moron. They're pistol proof at best.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's some brave dude.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is that a whole unfired bullet

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        He threw it really hard

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That's 65% more bullet, per bullet.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Turrets in fallout the whole bullet. Way more efficient.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is that a whole unfired bullet

      HERE AT APERTURE

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      > throwing 100

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The big lizard fears the caveman brain. Notice how that rock is coming from the side and not ahead, implying the deathclaw isn't attacking the guy that threw it

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Vietnam
    >Feed it only south east Asian children for 6 months
    >turn it loose on the population
    >turn 360 degrees and walk away
    Middle East
    >Feed it only south east Arab children for 6 months
    >turn it loose on the population
    >turn 360 degrees and walk away

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Feed is only X children for 6 months
      >turn it loose on the population
      >turn 360 degrees and walk away
      This has possibilities. I'm approving a pilot program for study in Donbass.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >itt chuds thinking sex with deathclaws is okay when it's literally the devs joking about your kind having a fetish about adult human females
    Media illiterate mongoloids all of you.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >a fetish about adult human females

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Media illiterate
      imagine using this buzzword unironically

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      don't care, still fapping to deathclaws

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >a fetish about adult human females

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >a fetish about adult human females

        Anons.... you need to se this.
        >pic related

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Not even as degen as the fact that most of the internet refers to wanting to reproduce repeatedly as a "breeding fetish".

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I will frick a death claw if I need to survive

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Who the frick is making these shitty threads?

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Release them into target area.
    Track and tranq them when it's over.
    Load them back up.
    Repeat.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Total gamer death

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *