If they don't, the brits will. Look up 'Moscow Criterion', -- in the event of a global thermonuclear war, the British goal is apparently to delete Moscow as hard as possible.
if it comes to that point, where the Russians really do trigger ww3, nuking every major Russian population center multiple times and then sending in a ground extermination force to wipe up all of their remote population is the only sensible outcome to stop their plague from ever returning.
if it comes to that point, where the Russians really do trigger ww3, nuking every major Russian population center multiple times and then sending in a ground extermination force to wipe up all of their remote population is the only sensible outcome to stop their plague from ever returning.
If they don't, the brits will. Look up 'Moscow Criterion', -- in the event of a global thermonuclear war, the British goal is apparently to delete Moscow as hard as possible.
Why are anglos the most unhinged when it comes to warfare?
Every nation fights wars according to their own values. This often means they think they will win if they can defeat or destroy the thing they believe is most important in their own society in the enemy's society.
It's why American plans focus so extensively on destroying the quality of life of the enemy in a protracted campaign. Likewise it's why many continental European powers like Germany focus on decapitating a small number of centralized administrations, and why South-East Asian countries zero in on the capture or destruction of seemingly symbolic seats of government power.
The British think every nation has an (inferior) London, and that the London is the only thing that truly holds the entire nation together. If you treat Moscow as Russia's London, and think it's literally the most important part of the Russian body, then yes, razing it to the ground becomes a matter of course.
I mean they aren’t wrong to an extent, destroying the major nerve center of a country is going to really frick things up, and in Russia’s case, even more so considering how centralized everything is in Moscow
>2 dozen >Moscow not getting a few hundred "just in case" due to Cold War plans from paranoid cold warriors >"That's a strategic target, 10 warheads on that because some of them may fail to reach and detonate."
No one wants to frick around in a world where any country can just throw a nuke here and there if their regional conflict isn't going the way they want. The only rational decision is complete nuclear annihilation of anyone who breaks the taboo. It isn't just a matter of punishing them for breaking the unspoken law. It needs to be made clear for anyone and everyone what the consequences are. The only situation in which using nukes as a first strike would be considered acceptable would be in legitimate defense of your homeland, which means destroying invading enemy forces. That's why the US won't support Ukraine if it comes to the point that they push back to their pre-2014 borders and try to keep going into Russia. If it comes to that point and Russia still hasn't capitulated and signed a treaty promising disarmament, then the form of the war will change to one of political economic strangulation.
>That's why the US won't support Ukraine if it comes to the point that they push back to their pre-2014 borders
Lol >try to keep going into Russia
Lmao
They're going to get all of Ukraine back. People tried coping by saying they wouldn't strike targets in Russia proper, been wrong for months. It's cope, free yourself.
Russia couldn’t protect their most important western airbase from a nig rigged surveillance drone dropping satchel charges. Twice. Moscow would be enveloped in nuclear hellfire before the population understood what was happening If the US felt like jizzing off modern cruse missiles
Nothing went wrong, but Putin announced like 12hrs ago he is going to do a major announcement in a few hours. People have joked this is 'the end of the SMO' and everybody goes home, but others have claimed that Putin is going to declare war properly and go full tyrantpilled. Or it could be 'we're nooking you for sending MBTs'.
Nothing went wrong, but Putin announced like 12hrs ago he is going to do a major announcement in a few hours. People have joked this is 'the end of the SMO' and everybody goes home, but others have claimed that Putin is going to declare war properly and go full tyrantpilled. Or it could be 'we're nooking you for sending MBTs'.
>Vladimir Rogov, a pro-Putin official appointed by the Russians to run the occupied Zaporizhzhia region in Ukraine, took to his Telegram channel to claim the Russian leader make the "important" speech tomorrow in St Petersburg.
Nothing went wrong, but Putin announced like 12hrs ago he is going to do a major announcement in a few hours. People have joked this is 'the end of the SMO' and everybody goes home, but others have claimed that Putin is going to declare war properly and go full tyrantpilled. Or it could be 'we're nooking you for sending MBTs'.
>want to be left alone with their own modest sphere of influence
I regret to inform you that Russia has a different idea of what that sphere's supposed to look like
[...] >want to be left alone with their own modest sphere of influence
I regret to inform you that Russia has a different idea of what that sphere's supposed to look like
If they just want to be left alone, then not invading their neighbors would have be a very good start, but clearly they can't keep their stepemutt rape horde to themselves
If North Korea has enough restraint to not use a nuke then the Russians aren't likely to either. The threat is enough.
The Russians are much more likely to use old Soviet era chemical munitions and then claim that the Ukrainians did it.
Yeah, remember what happened after chemical weapons were used in Syria?
That's right, nothing. No one was willing to risk their neck for that. And they won't for Ukraine, either.
They'll squabble over who did it and point fingers, they'll have pointless UN meetings that go nowhere and ultimately nothing will change.
The only real red line is nukes and even then the West won't retaliate with nukes unless they have no alternative.
Nobody is willing to die for Ukraine either you arrogant homosexual. As long as it stays a proxy war the West is fine with watching it burn, they don't care.
Please don't tell me you actually fell for all the social media propaganda.
>Nobody
But what about all those black rusophobe polish mercenaries? Did they gave up on their dream to turn russia into lgbt trans atheist israelitestan?
Pootpoot won't nuke shit because a) he's an animic little b***h plateau sole wearing homosexual midget and b) his Commie the Pooh bull pimp Xi ChinkPing won't let him
ABMs don't work lmao
Nuclear armed ones do
And no nuclear power has them, *wink* *wink*
I dont think the American nuclear plan even targets Moscow directly. Silos, air bases, command centers, shipyards are first to get wrecked.
If they don't, the brits will. Look up 'Moscow Criterion', -- in the event of a global thermonuclear war, the British goal is apparently to delete Moscow as hard as possible.
if it comes to that point, where the Russians really do trigger ww3, nuking every major Russian population center multiple times and then sending in a ground extermination force to wipe up all of their remote population is the only sensible outcome to stop their plague from ever returning.
Based and Fabius Bile pilled
More like Perturabo pilled. Fabius Bile would try to make the "perfect Russian" and the end result would be the Russians we have today.
This, but for the bongs and the mutts too, finally the deutschen ubermensch will inherit the earth
frogs bros, yank bros..
should we hat-trick?
This but with Israel, and instead of WW3 we do it now.
Can we at least drop some megatons on Belgrado for old times sake?
Based.
Very based. Suffer not the vatnig to live.
This is almost the most anglo war plan I've ever heard, after the Samson option
Why are anglos the most unhinged when it comes to warfare?
Every nation fights wars according to their own values. This often means they think they will win if they can defeat or destroy the thing they believe is most important in their own society in the enemy's society.
It's why American plans focus so extensively on destroying the quality of life of the enemy in a protracted campaign. Likewise it's why many continental European powers like Germany focus on decapitating a small number of centralized administrations, and why South-East Asian countries zero in on the capture or destruction of seemingly symbolic seats of government power.
The British think every nation has an (inferior) London, and that the London is the only thing that truly holds the entire nation together. If you treat Moscow as Russia's London, and think it's literally the most important part of the Russian body, then yes, razing it to the ground becomes a matter of course.
moscow is the most important part of russia by design
I mean they aren’t wrong to an extent, destroying the major nerve center of a country is going to really frick things up, and in Russia’s case, even more so considering how centralized everything is in Moscow
based anon making me consider different cultural symbols and perceptions of victory
I imagine that there's at least one or two critical CCC nodes within Moscow that would get a bomb lobbed at it
The.
Kremlin.
(You) fricking idiot.
>Russia nuke meme
Yawn. Everyone knows the school ground bully has no balls. Low key France is the only country I see using the bomb in Europe.
France has the most aggressive stance when it comes to using nukes so that wouldn’t be a surprise at all.
Not well at all, especially since US will inevitably overestimate the system capability and instead of 2 warheads send 2 dozen.
>2 dozen
>Moscow not getting a few hundred "just in case" due to Cold War plans from paranoid cold warriors
>"That's a strategic target, 10 warheads on that because some of them may fail to reach and detonate."
No one wants to frick around in a world where any country can just throw a nuke here and there if their regional conflict isn't going the way they want. The only rational decision is complete nuclear annihilation of anyone who breaks the taboo. It isn't just a matter of punishing them for breaking the unspoken law. It needs to be made clear for anyone and everyone what the consequences are. The only situation in which using nukes as a first strike would be considered acceptable would be in legitimate defense of your homeland, which means destroying invading enemy forces. That's why the US won't support Ukraine if it comes to the point that they push back to their pre-2014 borders and try to keep going into Russia. If it comes to that point and Russia still hasn't capitulated and signed a treaty promising disarmament, then the form of the war will change to one of political economic strangulation.
>That's why the US won't support Ukraine if it comes to the point that they push back to their pre-2014 borders
Lol
>try to keep going into Russia
Lmao
They're going to get all of Ukraine back. People tried coping by saying they wouldn't strike targets in Russia proper, been wrong for months. It's cope, free yourself.
You can’t read.
>nobody wants to nuke anyone
>therefore we should kill 2 billion people with nuclear weapons
kys
>based Henry Kissinger enters the thread
Get fricked, traitor.
If the target is Davos he'll protect everyone including Moscow.
Russia couldn’t protect their most important western airbase from a nig rigged surveillance drone dropping satchel charges. Twice. Moscow would be enveloped in nuclear hellfire before the population understood what was happening If the US felt like jizzing off modern cruse missiles
vatnik could protect their airbases from one mong with a bag of C4
So what went wrong that shills are going back to " Muh nooks " moronation?
Nothing went wrong, but Putin announced like 12hrs ago he is going to do a major announcement in a few hours. People have joked this is 'the end of the SMO' and everybody goes home, but others have claimed that Putin is going to declare war properly and go full tyrantpilled. Or it could be 'we're nooking you for sending MBTs'.
T-the gloves are coming off?
>Vladimir Rogov, a pro-Putin official appointed by the Russians to run the occupied Zaporizhzhia region in Ukraine, took to his Telegram channel to claim the Russian leader make the "important" speech tomorrow in St Petersburg.
IT'S HAPPENING
Something is indeed happening, but what exactly?
The guy said that Putin was going to do a speech at St Petersburg and the DoomsDay aircraft is up, so assume Putin is around.
>Doomsday aircraft
Loitering well within range of Patriot missiles in the Baltics?
Are you moronic? Why would anybody attack Putin's aircraft? How moronic are you?
or its designed to pull focus from the NATO chief of staff meeting today & tomorrow.
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/events_67375.htm
tune in live if you really want, but they'll summarise at the end anyway
>want to be left alone with their own modest sphere of influence
I regret to inform you that Russia has a different idea of what that sphere's supposed to look like
You didn't post the half of the stupid.
Good, something tells me after this happens there won’t be any Syrians in Munich anymore.
If they just want to be left alone, then not invading their neighbors would have be a very good start, but clearly they can't keep their stepemutt rape horde to themselves
He didn't say Slavs, contributors to science/art, or people who mind their own business. He said Russians, which are none of those.
That's a pretty spiffy drawing.
Reminder that nuclear weapons will never be used in a war or conflict ever again.
They dont care, cant be worse than chernobyl
If North Korea has enough restraint to not use a nuke then the Russians aren't likely to either. The threat is enough.
The Russians are much more likely to use old Soviet era chemical munitions and then claim that the Ukrainians did it.
>won’t use nukes
>but will use munitions that will get essentially the same response anyway
Amazing, truly masters of tactics
Yeah, remember what happened after chemical weapons were used in Syria?
That's right, nothing. No one was willing to risk their neck for that. And they won't for Ukraine, either.
They'll squabble over who did it and point fingers, they'll have pointless UN meetings that go nowhere and ultimately nothing will change.
The only real red line is nukes and even then the West won't retaliate with nukes unless they have no alternative.
>Yeah, remember what happened after chemical weapons were used in Syria?
That's because nobody cares about Syria, dear.
Nobody is willing to die for Ukraine either you arrogant homosexual. As long as it stays a proxy war the West is fine with watching it burn, they don't care.
Please don't tell me you actually fell for all the social media propaganda.
But anon while ukraine is western proxy, russia is not a proxy state so it can't be called proxy war and it's not fair for the russia.
I’m just happy for the war because no matter who wins the war there will be less Slavs after.
>Nobody
But what about all those black rusophobe polish mercenaries? Did they gave up on their dream to turn russia into lgbt trans atheist israelitestan?
Is no one willing to die for Ukraine or are nato troops in Ukraine, make up your mind
>how well will it protect moscow
Well, anon, that's the neat part ....
Pootpoot won't nuke shit because a) he's an animic little b***h plateau sole wearing homosexual midget and b) his Commie the Pooh bull pimp Xi ChinkPing won't let him
What a whimsical drawing