if putin NOOKS how well will it protect moscow

if putin NOOKS how well will it protect moscow

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    ABMs don't work lmao

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Nuclear armed ones do
      And no nuclear power has them, *wink* *wink*

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I dont think the American nuclear plan even targets Moscow directly. Silos, air bases, command centers, shipyards are first to get wrecked.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      If they don't, the brits will. Look up 'Moscow Criterion', -- in the event of a global thermonuclear war, the British goal is apparently to delete Moscow as hard as possible.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        if it comes to that point, where the Russians really do trigger ww3, nuking every major Russian population center multiple times and then sending in a ground extermination force to wipe up all of their remote population is the only sensible outcome to stop their plague from ever returning.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Based and Fabius Bile pilled

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            More like Perturabo pilled. Fabius Bile would try to make the "perfect Russian" and the end result would be the Russians we have today.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          This, but for the bongs and the mutts too, finally the deutschen ubermensch will inherit the earth

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            frogs bros, yank bros..

            should we hat-trick?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          This but with Israel, and instead of WW3 we do it now.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Can we at least drop some megatons on Belgrado for old times sake?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Based.

        if it comes to that point, where the Russians really do trigger ww3, nuking every major Russian population center multiple times and then sending in a ground extermination force to wipe up all of their remote population is the only sensible outcome to stop their plague from ever returning.

        Very based. Suffer not the vatnig to live.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        This is almost the most anglo war plan I've ever heard, after the Samson option

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          If they don't, the brits will. Look up 'Moscow Criterion', -- in the event of a global thermonuclear war, the British goal is apparently to delete Moscow as hard as possible.

          Why are anglos the most unhinged when it comes to warfare?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Every nation fights wars according to their own values. This often means they think they will win if they can defeat or destroy the thing they believe is most important in their own society in the enemy's society.

            It's why American plans focus so extensively on destroying the quality of life of the enemy in a protracted campaign. Likewise it's why many continental European powers like Germany focus on decapitating a small number of centralized administrations, and why South-East Asian countries zero in on the capture or destruction of seemingly symbolic seats of government power.

            The British think every nation has an (inferior) London, and that the London is the only thing that truly holds the entire nation together. If you treat Moscow as Russia's London, and think it's literally the most important part of the Russian body, then yes, razing it to the ground becomes a matter of course.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              moscow is the most important part of russia by design

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              I mean they aren’t wrong to an extent, destroying the major nerve center of a country is going to really fuck things up, and in Russia’s case, even more so considering how centralized everything is in Moscow

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              based anon making me consider different cultural symbols and perceptions of victory

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I imagine that there's at least one or two critical CCC nodes within Moscow that would get a bomb lobbed at it

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      The.
      Kremlin.
      (You) fucking idiot.

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Russia nuke meme
    Yawn. Everyone knows the school ground bully has no balls. Low key France is the only country I see using the bomb in Europe.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      France has the most aggressive stance when it comes to using nukes so that wouldn’t be a surprise at all.

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Not well at all, especially since US will inevitably overestimate the system capability and instead of 2 warheads send 2 dozen.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >2 dozen
      >Moscow not getting a few hundred "just in case" due to Cold War plans from paranoid cold warriors
      >"That's a strategic target, 10 warheads on that because some of them may fail to reach and detonate."

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    No one wants to fuck around in a world where any country can just throw a nuke here and there if their regional conflict isn't going the way they want. The only rational decision is complete nuclear annihilation of anyone who breaks the taboo. It isn't just a matter of punishing them for breaking the unspoken law. It needs to be made clear for anyone and everyone what the consequences are. The only situation in which using nukes as a first strike would be considered acceptable would be in legitimate defense of your homeland, which means destroying invading enemy forces. That's why the US won't support Ukraine if it comes to the point that they push back to their pre-2014 borders and try to keep going into Russia. If it comes to that point and Russia still hasn't capitulated and signed a treaty promising disarmament, then the form of the war will change to one of political economic strangulation.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >That's why the US won't support Ukraine if it comes to the point that they push back to their pre-2014 borders
      Lol
      >try to keep going into Russia
      Lmao
      They're going to get all of Ukraine back. People tried coping by saying they wouldn't strike targets in Russia proper, been wrong for months. It's cope, free yourself.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        You can’t read.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >nobody wants to nuke anyone
      >therefore we should kill 2 billion people with nuclear weapons
      kys

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >based Henry Kissinger enters the thread
      Get fucked, traitor.

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    If the target is Davos he'll protect everyone including Moscow.

  7. 1 week ago
    Guy Person

    Russia couldn’t protect their most important western airbase from a nig rigged surveillance drone dropping satchel charges. Twice. Moscow would be enveloped in nuclear hellfire before the population understood what was happening If the US felt like jizzing off modern cruse missiles

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      vatnik could protect their airbases from one mong with a bag of C4

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    So what went wrong that shills are going back to " Muh nooks " retardation?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing went wrong, but Putin announced like 12hrs ago he is going to do a major announcement in a few hours. People have joked this is 'the end of the SMO' and everybody goes home, but others have claimed that Putin is going to declare war properly and go full tyrantpilled. Or it could be 'we're nooking you for sending MBTs'.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        T-the gloves are coming off?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Nothing went wrong, but Putin announced like 12hrs ago he is going to do a major announcement in a few hours. People have joked this is 'the end of the SMO' and everybody goes home, but others have claimed that Putin is going to declare war properly and go full tyrantpilled. Or it could be 'we're nooking you for sending MBTs'.

          >Vladimir Rogov, a pro-Putin official appointed by the Russians to run the occupied Zaporizhzhia region in Ukraine, took to his Telegram channel to claim the Russian leader make the "important" speech tomorrow in St Petersburg.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            T-the gloves are coming off?

            Nothing went wrong, but Putin announced like 12hrs ago he is going to do a major announcement in a few hours. People have joked this is 'the end of the SMO' and everybody goes home, but others have claimed that Putin is going to declare war properly and go full tyrantpilled. Or it could be 'we're nooking you for sending MBTs'.

            IT'S HAPPENING

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Something is indeed happening, but what exactly?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                The guy said that Putin was going to do a speech at St Petersburg and the DoomsDay aircraft is up, so assume Putin is around.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Doomsday aircraft
                Loitering well within range of Patriot missiles in the Baltics?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Are you retarded? Why would anybody attack Putin's aircraft? How retarded are you?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        or its designed to pull focus from the NATO chief of staff meeting today & tomorrow.

        https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/events_67375.htm

        tune in live if you really want, but they'll summarise at the end anyway

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >want to be left alone with their own modest sphere of influence
    I regret to inform you that Russia has a different idea of what that sphere's supposed to look like

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      You didn't post the half of the stupid.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Good, something tells me after this happens there won’t be any Syrians in Munich anymore.

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    https://i.imgur.com/HFB6RiS.jpg

    [...]
    >want to be left alone with their own modest sphere of influence
    I regret to inform you that Russia has a different idea of what that sphere's supposed to look like

    If they just want to be left alone, then not invading their neighbors would have be a very good start, but clearly they can't keep their stepemutt rape horde to themselves

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    He didn't say Slavs, contributors to science/art, or people who mind their own business. He said Russians, which are none of those.

  12. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    That's a pretty spiffy drawing.

  13. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
  14. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that nuclear weapons will never be used in a war or conflict ever again.

  15. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    They dont care, cant be worse than chernobyl

  16. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    If North Korea has enough restraint to not use a nuke then the Russians aren't likely to either. The threat is enough.
    The Russians are much more likely to use old Soviet era chemical munitions and then claim that the Ukrainians did it.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >won’t use nukes
      >but will use munitions that will get essentially the same response anyway
      Amazing, truly masters of tactics

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, remember what happened after chemical weapons were used in Syria?
        That's right, nothing. No one was willing to risk their neck for that. And they won't for Ukraine, either.
        They'll squabble over who did it and point fingers, they'll have pointless UN meetings that go nowhere and ultimately nothing will change.
        The only real red line is nukes and even then the West won't retaliate with nukes unless they have no alternative.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >Yeah, remember what happened after chemical weapons were used in Syria?
          That's because nobody cares about Syria, dear.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Nobody is willing to die for Ukraine either you arrogant gay. As long as it stays a proxy war the West is fine with watching it burn, they don't care.
            Please don't tell me you actually fell for all the social media propaganda.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              But anon while ukraine is western proxy, russia is not a proxy state so it can't be called proxy war and it's not fair for the russia.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                I’m just happy for the war because no matter who wins the war there will be less Slavs after.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >Nobody
              But what about all those black rusophobe polish mercenaries? Did they gave up on their dream to turn russia into lgbt trans atheist garden gnomestan?

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Is no one willing to die for Ukraine or are nato troops in Ukraine, make up your mind

  17. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >how well will it protect moscow
    Well, anon, that's the neat part ....

  18. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Pootpoot won't nuke shit because a) he's an animic moron plateau sole wearing gay midget and b) his Commie the Pooh bull pimp Xi ChinkPing won't let him

  19. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    What a whimsical drawing

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *