If puccia really destroyed even a single patriot launcher?

If puccia really destroyed even a single patriot launcher / radar does it really matter?
why are they gloating like they've shutdown the whole AA system of Ukraine?
quick look showed there are over 1000 deployed units in US alone so a single AA shouldn't matter that much?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Russians are under the assumption that these 40 year old hand me downs are wonderwaffe so we must only have a few.

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    They need to destroy one to use it as social morphine. The subBlack folk think they are a warrior society and not the biggest slave ship in the Galaxy.

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    No. A month ago Ukraine had 0 Patriots. If they destroy only one would be a little closer to that.
    But if Putin chimps out and waste all its missiles on a stupid Patriot then he's simply stupid. A patriot can't defend all the territory.

    Patriots are a ruin in the mil AA system, it's just a second system to avoid running out of S-300 mid and long range missiles. All this hype is because russian incompetence that can't even do SEAD. All the shahed spam was a waste, the kalibr and kh-55 the same.
    I thing that they're using literal monkeys with typewriters to decide what to do next. Stupid as monke

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      run in the mill*
      I think*

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's "run of the mill'. The etymology is that it originally referred to general everyday output from literal fabric mills, as opposed to finer quality items.

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >oh no no no
    https://kyivindependent.com/pentagon-confirms-damage-to-patriot-system-in-ukraine-says-its-already-repaired/
    also cute JDF control trugg

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    If they really destroyed a part of Patriot battery, they would publish it so all the shills could spam it for months. This is just another "300% of ukie airforce destroyed" or "40 out 16 himars destroyed" cope for domestic consumption.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      They were spamming a video of the alleged incident quite a fricking lot around here, shortly after it happened. The video is inconclusive as we can't see the launchers. Assuming a Patriot site was damaged by the explosion, the one ironic takeaway from it is that this only happened after 16 missiles were launched beforehand. If it was hit, it was because it was out of ammo, or because debris from something it intercepted fell around the launch site.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >They were spamming a video of the alleged incident quite a fricking lot around here, shortly after it happened. The video is inconclusive as we can't see the launchers.
        It's funny that all the Patriot destroyed spam dried up immediately after the barrage the next day got wiped out.

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    They said they destroyed 7 HIMARS.

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    They are desperate for propaganda victories.
    Prepare for the same thing to repeat once the first Leo 2 inevitably gets destroyed.

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Patriot radars are very valuable even without the missile battery because they also do air-search. But from Russia's perspective, they just want some tit-for-tat propaganda victories.
    >Kinzhal shot down by patriot
    >Patriot destroyed by Kinzhal xaxaxaxa
    and so forth, you'll see it with practically every piece of western gear

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >If puccia really destroyed even a single patriot launcher / radar does it really matter?
    >why are they gloating like they've shutdown the whole AA system of Ukraine?
    >quick look showed there are over 1000 deployed units in US alone so a single AA shouldn't matter that much?

    If the holhols destroyed even a single Kinzahl does it really matter?
    Why are they gloating like dozens of missiles aren't getting through their AA every night?
    quick looked showed that Russia isn't running out of guided weapons and can still destroy any target in Ukraine that it chooses.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      The increased air defenses mean that Russia needs to use increasingly larger volleys of missiles to hit a target, which is cost prohibitive. The missile attacks have tapered off into a once a month thing. It's because Russia needs to build up its stocks after every attack.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >If the holhols destroyed even a single Kinzahl does it really matter?
      It's really funny because Russia claimed they were impossible to intercept.

      >Why are they gloating like dozens of missiles aren't getting through their AA every night?
      >every night
      >implying Russia is capable to chimping out every night

      >quick looked showed that Russia isn't running out of guided weapons and can still destroy any target in Ukraine that it chooses.
      Sure, they just don't want to destroy anything of military significance. But they totally could :^)

  10. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Patriot missile is the only combat proven system to intercept ballistic missiles and Russias highly touted hypersonic missile.

    S300s and s400s don’t even come close. They certainly failed multiple times in Syria against US and Israeli attacks.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      the s300 in syria were just posturing, they never actually fired at anything

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >If puccia really destroyed even a single patriot launcher / radar does it really matter?
    Theoretically it would be important if they exploited the lack of SAM coverage. The proof that they didn't score any meaningful damage is that there wasn't a followup raid.

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    if they honestly believed their propaganda, they'd launch a massive missile attack against kiev right now to prove that its air defense is crippled. why would you spend so much resources on SEAD and then do absolutely nothing with it after succeeding?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      They don't have the missiles for a massive attack. They've been sending 3 to 10 missiles and a couple shaheds every day though.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >they dont have the missiles for a massive attack
        >he says 2 days after a massive missile attack

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          1 day, they did a couple consecutively. Not that it matters, all missiles were shot down lel.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            kyiv has been attacked 9 times in may so far. you dont know what tf you are talking about.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      > if they honestly believed their propaganda, they'd launch a massive missile attack against kiev right now to prove that its air defense is crippled.
      Hell, they could just send in jets if they're short on missiles. At this point their blatant and easily-disprovable falsehoods serve no purpose other than to draw attention to the massive L.
      > why would you spend so much resources on SEAD and then do absolutely nothing with it after succeeding?
      There's a whole list of snarky comments about the Kremlin's military acumen that could be written in response to that question, Anon, but let me treat it seriously. Everything over the past year looks from the outside like a series of "quick fixes" to the current crisis -- there's no overall grand strategy, just tactical lurching from one thing to another.
      The Russians went in expecting a blue-sky outcome; all of their plans assumed minimal resistance from the AFU, the Ukrainian Government, and the international community. They seem to have not consciously acknowledged that wasn't what happened, and they're now sleepwalking through a major conflict.
      When the training regiment vehicles were spotted in active combat duty last year, a little before Kherson fell, it was proof that Putin was willing to cause long-term damage to his own infrastructure for a quick sugar rush of manpower and materiel. I think that for much of the past year, Putin can't, psychologically, shake his conviction that the end is just around the corner, the Ukrainians are on the verge of cracking, and that the whole thing will be over with a Russian victory in... well, about two weeks.

  13. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    If they destroyed a radar, it would be a huge blow, without that the launchers are useless. But they didn't destroy the radar.

    If they destroyed a launcher, it's not a big deal thes can be easily replaced, and one battery has 8 launchers.

    From what it look like, they damaged one launcher that has since been repaired.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      > be Pucciya
      > Patriot reportedly shoots down your hypersonic wonder weapon missile worth $10 million
      > "Lies! Slander! The Khinzal hit target perfectly and the Patriot didn't intercept anything, also the missile it shot down wasn't a Khinzal, and we have never fired a Khinzal missile yet. And why are the Ukrainians using Storm Shadow to massacre poor Donetsk orphans who just happened to be touring a military supply facility after curfew?!"
      > losing face bigly
      > need to show everybody who's the vozhd
      > gonna show those fricking hohols
      > gonna show those fricking yankees
      > gonna launch SIX Khinzals right up that Patriot's ass
      > $60,000,000 chimpout is cleared for launch
      > "Mighty Russia can confidently report we have destroyed five of the two Patriot systems deployed in Ukraine!"
      > damage assessment comes in: minor enough that the Patriot doesn't need to go to the shop for repairs.
      > immediately say the yankees must be lying
      > nobody believes you
      > not even you, or you'd launch an air mission
      > tfw you burned through $70 million of your game-changing wonderwaffle and all it managed was a "yeah, that'll buff right out".

      kek

  14. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >haha! 90 gorillion gaytriots and not a single one ever destroyed!!!
    >NOOOO! hohols are dying like flies. w-w-w-warcrimes!!1!
    make up your minds, homosexuals

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >having patriots means war crimes cant happen
      maybe this statement made sense with your particular wienertail of krokodil and hiv antiretrovirals

  15. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    It’s an expensive system and Ukraine doesn’t have a lot of them. Still, the fact that vatnik shill machine is in overdrive trying to claim that 6 million patriots have been destroyed make it seem like this is a whole lot of nothing.

    Using strategic weapons for SEAD in an area that you do not intend to operate in? The entire attack is likely just Russia sperging due to air assets being shot down

  16. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >"ALL RUSSIAN MISSILES WERE INTERCEPTED"
    >"NO TARGETS WERE HIT"
    >"THE PATRIOT SYSTEM WAS 100% SUCCESSFUL"
    >"THE PATRIOT SYSTEM WAS NOT HIT"
    later....
    >"If puccia really destroyed even a single patriot launcher / radar does it really matter?"

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      So a Russian missile got through completely unintercepted, hit its target, and didn't even destroy an unarmored truck full of missiles?
      You do realize how that's worse, right? You moron.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >ok it hit the patriot
        >but it was only "damaged"..... and now it has been "repaired"...
        I'll enjoy the next stage of cope when you reach it

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >All missiles hit and patriot was destroyed
          >Ok patriot wasn't destroyed but it was still damaged
          >Ok patriot was repaired but something must have gotten through so it wasn't technically 100% interception
          Same to you

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            how could a patriot be repaired if it wasn't damaged lol

  17. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    ok, since there are no air defenses now the missile attacks will go unchallenged, right?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why would we send more missiles? Our target was patriot and not it is destroyed and the khohols have learned their lesson. We will be nice and not destroy them any more...f or a while at least*~~)

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >all those missile attacks before the patriot

  18. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >denial
    >anger
    >bargaining
    # YOU ARE HERE #
    >depression
    >acceptance

  19. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't see what this thread is about.
    Russia damaged a patriot after expending exponentially more effort than it was worth.
    So now they are diluting the news feed from the recent shootdowns of planes in Russian airspace, and the slow trickle of information coming in about the counter-offensive beginning.

    No the patriot is not a Wunderwaffe, they are standard kit in every pro-West country with an army.

    But clearly its better than whatever shit the Russians have.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      oh also.
      Patriot systems aren't even the expensive bit, its the missiles that are worth anything.

      And I haven't even seen Russian media report on them taking out a Patriots missiles.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *