If it comes down to it, how fast can NATO steamroll the Russians?

If it comes down to it, how fast can NATO steamroll the Russians?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Two weeks.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Underrated post

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Russia wouldn't last a week. At this point I think 1990s Iraq would put up better resistance.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      moron. Your not just going up against China.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I meant Russia. China would get involved. Every nation involved in or interested in BRICs would get involved.
        America is a divided country and will not win. There are people in the US who would attack the government while they're off fighting BRICS nations.
        How will the US Government and Military fight a world war and a civil war at the same time?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >muh global south stands united
          Now this is some thirdie/vatnik cope

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >thirdie/vatnik cope
            scared glowBlack person?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          stupid indian go back shitting in the street

          >thirdie/vatnik cope
          scared glowBlack person?

          Terrified of the power of south africa and argentina for sure

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >BRICS
          Stopped reading there. BRICS isn't a military alliance or even a coherent economic alliance, it's a buzzword made by a Goldman Sachs president back in 2004 and every BRICS nation has underperformed.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >NATO has only been losing territory
    ?
    When did NATO send troops to Ukraine?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      bbut NATO attacked the glorious state of russia, hence the special military operation! what do you mean nato didnt send any troops to attack rossiya??!!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      When the FSB troons figured it would make their defeat look better.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Nukes????

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I'm gonna NOOOOOOK
      Seriously now, no one is going to use the nukes unless they are insane, their role is just as deterrents and God knows if they even work at this point.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Russian government will not use nukes to protect Russia, but they will use nukes to protect their own authority over Russia.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >unless they are insane
        Very likely they would get used then. The real question is how much territory each side could retain after a counter-force exchange.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Do they work?
      I mean that seriously. Given the amount of posturing going on, I'm very surprised by how relatively inactive Russian Strategic Rocket Forces have been. Not many alerts to speak of, if any, to my knowledge, and beyond verbal huffing and puffing no showy deployments/redeployments of TELs. For all the "i'm gonna NOOOOOK" threats and theatrics, they've mostly really shown that they're either not seriously considering using them at all, or that they frankly can't and want to save themselves the colossal embarrassment and strategically horrifying implications of having it known to the world.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        it's more likely putin doesn't control the nukes
        kleptocratic pseudo-dictatorships like russia usually have factions retain independence over their most important assets
        now traditionally most of those kind of countries are african so it might be something like irrigation projects being untouchable by others for the agricultural faction but it would not be far-fetched for the russian military to have said "no monke, banana for you, nuke for us"
        and if they keep to it as a block what's putin going to do, disband the entire fricking military?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        From the amount of money russia spends on it's nuclear arms and the number of tests (none of them succesful btw) they did in the 21st century one can assume their capabilites are limited. And if you then consider that these types nuclear weapons "go bad" after about 15 years without refurbishment/replacement, the nook clock is defintely ticking

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That's even assuming that money went where it was intended, which it most certainly did not.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        if it were somehow confirmed that russia had zero functional nukes, america would immediately invade them and give them freedom

        the problem is that even one nook can cause a lot of damage

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >if it were somehow confirmed that russia had zero functional nukes, america would immediately invade them and give them freedom
          why didn't america invade somalia?

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They've had a year to plan Arctic Storm now, I'd give it 72 hours to the end of effective Russian operations in Ukraine. There'd still be troops there, but they'd either be running for the border or hiding in a hole trying to scream louder than the explosions. From there, I'd expect Russia to be entirely out of Ukraine (minus Crimea) within two weeks tops, and that's accounting for Ukraine doing most of the ground fighting while NATO troops move to the front. It's at this point where I'd expect monke to mash the nook button, since he lives in a world where the strong always eat the weak, and it is only now dawning on him that Russia is very, very weak.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    So 2,000 Poles caused Russia to have 200,000+ Casualties?

    Jesus Russians are really fricking bad at war.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >bunch of poles go to moscow
      >they introduce vore to russians
      >they try to frick off because eating all of them will take centuries
      >too fat to return, get killed on the way instead
      >russia makes it a holiday
      Yeah I believe in those casualties

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >muh nato and shieeet
    why always NATO? in the past countries like Germany could fight directly against russians.. what happen eurohomosexuals? don't you have the balls to rise against some vatBlack folk?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No kill like overkill

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Well, in 2022 Russia launched a war of aggression (I'd say an illegal war of aggression, but it's only illegal in the Russian Criminal Code which according to vatniks doesn't count) that reignited Atlanticist NATO identity, so now people think in terms of NATO and not in terms of its individual members.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Well, in 2014 Russia launched a war of aggression
        ftfy

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Well, in 2014 Russia had enough of nato glowBlack person-led recently couped israelitekraine slaughtering ethnic Russians living in the east of Ukraine
          ftfy

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, real counter insurgency is brutal as frick and doesn't look like that forever war hearts and minds bullshit

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >it's only illegal in the Russian Criminal Code
        No, it is also clearly illegal according to international law.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      European nations have allies, a concept foreign to the Russian mind.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That depends. Without the US NATO chances are pretty bad. Technology is superior, but ammunition stockpiles would not be enough to kill everything. It would be glorious 2 weeks of Russians dying and then there won't any shell to fire.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >NATO has been losing territory
    Ukraine is in NATO now? Hold up, I'll call the Poles.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      cześć, this is the Poles speaking
      don't every phone here again you israelite worshiping homosexual

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    the cope numbers are the funniest thing of this war

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly I do not think conquering Russia in its entirety would really be feasible even with how fricking shitty their military is. There's just so much ground to cover and the defenders always have an advantage.
    That being said, NATO would fricking curbstomp the RUAF and would be able to bomb Russia with impunity after wiping out their SAMs. They might be able to keep NATO troops out of some select areas, but they would 100% lose a bunch of territory and would have absolutely no way to get it back.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Russia in its entirety would be easy to conquer actually, cause it's entirely founded on its European side. The rest is totally dependent. Control the biggest cities and main railways, and any serious military resistance evaporates. Russia is simply too big to protect itself

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      theres no way this is real. so fricking sad

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Slavs

        https://i.imgur.com/AYNIbXf.png

        The fricker got up holy shit

        Weight displacement from multiple wheels

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The fricker got up holy shit

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    what the frick is NAFO you absolute weirdo

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Some /misc/ discord group
      They constantly talk about it, but never explain it

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      People who like to use Cheems in army gear as their twitter avatars while talking shit about Russia. It's genuinely impressive just how hard they buckbroke the vatniks by just existing.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A strawman

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    How is Ukraine in NATO? When did NATO enter into direct fighting with Russia? I fell asleep and this happens? Frick frick frick.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    NATO victory in 1-2 years followed by a decade of insurgency if they frick up the occupation.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Insurgency
      The US literally appointed Yeltsin and not one Russian made a peep.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >how fast can NATO steamroll the Russians?
    how high (enemy) casualty rate are you willing to accept?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      All of them.
      I'm a moderate btw.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Most of the damage to Russia's most important things would be done in the first 24 hours. War would probably be one in a couple months purely because of how big Russia is. Japan would probably take part and invade the Kuril islands and retake Karafuto. I'd also expect China remain neutral then join in with the express goal of taking Vladivostok and surrounding territory the second they realize Russia's usefulness is decisively at an end.

    [...]

    Why do vatniks so firmly believe Russia is actually fighting NATO right now? Is that the only way they can rationalize Russia's abysmal performance?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >one instead of won
      Apparently I need to go the frick to sleep.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Why do vatniks so firmly believe Russia is actually fighting NATO right now? Is that the only way they can rationalize Russia's abysmal performance?
      Apparently according to this post

      [...]

      it happened last night you must have been asleep like me, I guess Russia attacked the baltics or Poland? Someone tell us what happened.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/EcV1Cm8.png

      If it comes down to it, how fast can NATO steamroll the Russians?

      Come to think of it, why would NATO even do a land invasion? Russia is frickhuge and those distances are gonna cause problems no matter how good your logistics are.
      The best way of fricking them over is just SEADing the frick out of all of their air defenses and establishing a no-fly zone.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I'd also expect China remain neutral
      moronic

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They're not going to destroy their economy for the land of vodka and krokodil.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Has nothing to do with russia and everything to do with nato expanding its border would effectively kill Chinas expansionist goals for this century

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I'm guessing you saw "I'd also expect China remain neutral" and didn't bother to read the rest of that same sentence.

            Territorial expansion is explicitly why I believe they'd be neutral for a bit. Let the west do the heavy lifting in the earliest days and let them take the full risk of catching a vodka infused nuke that may or may not work. Then invade Russia themselves publicly stating they want to take part in the subjugation of a nuclear belligerent. They end up looking better on the world stage but also have the best claim they've had on large chunks of eastern Russia in a very long time. That's a LOT of potential expansion and may even allow them to reduce tensions by distracting the populace from Taiwan. China only gains from this strategy.

  18. 1 year ago
    RC-135 Rivet Joint

    If we 100% know where Putin is?
    If we 100% know the defense condition of the Russia's nuclear weapons?(Nukes on auto launch or direct control by key people? Just Putin?)
    If the USAF thinks it can send a strike package to drop a tactical nuclear weapon on each HVT and nuclear C&C node?
    Is every Russian Boomer accounted for and being stalked?

    Maybe a few hours

    I just don't think all the required intelligence agencies would give their blessings

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/EcV1Cm8.png

      If it comes down to it, how fast can NATO steamroll the Russians?

      >If it comes down to it, how fast can NATO steamroll the Russians?
      from go to close 6 minimum 8 hours maximum

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I just don't think all the required intelligence agencies would give their blessings
      This would be the biggest kicker.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >how quickly would RU forces be in Warsaw
    If they're fighting Ukraine alone, like right now? Considering their pace, in the event that Ukraine doesn't counterattack anymore, it would take about 400-500 years for them to reach Western border of Ukraine.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Well, boys, it's been a good run. I expect the bombs to start dropping now. Making peace with God before the sirens start.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If air superiority can't be reached, it would turn into Bakhmut-style shitfest.
    >s-400
    >520 launchers as of september 2019 if you take wikipedia numbers.
    >s-300
    >2000 launchers as of who the frick knows, if you take wiki numbers
    I could see it panning out either way, from SEAD being successful to USAF being buck broken in front of the world the same way RuAF was.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      those haven't stopped the ukies from launching raids into russia proper
      So I wonder how well they would hold up against anything with tech past the 80ies

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Every successful raid making international news for days is not the volume you need to win a war, nor is it air superiority.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >to USAF being buck broken in front of the world the same way RuAF was.
      I see the angle you're going for, but it's too much of a laughably false equivalence to try and draw parallels between the USAF's forecast effectiveness now versus the VVS' before the invasion.
      Even pre-2022 evaluations of the VVS pale *wildly* in comparison to those of the USAF. The USAF has had and still has problems, but none on the scale of what existed prior to 2022 for Russia, let alone what's been revealed in the year since.

      tl;dr it's objectively unlikely the USAF falls flat on its face in any way approaching the failure VVS.
      Man, I'd wager the Canadian Air Force by itself would do fine-ish against the threat matrix in Ukraine plus SEAD strikes on near-border-targets in Russia proper.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What the frick are they going to do against invisible F35 you inbred thirdie?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >VatBlack person air defense
      >Doing anything VS a Lightning and Raptor vanguard
      They didn't do shit in Syria and they wouldn't do anything in Russia either
      A few DEAD runs and the 4th gen thousand plane mass raping can be done unimpeded

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >NATO establishes air superiority immediately
    >war is as good as over

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Also, according to CCN

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Had to read the title 3 times to understand they weren't saying that Russia suffered 5/6th of its losses in Bakhmut. I need sleep.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    72-96 hours to push all Russian forces in Ukraine back to pre-2022 lines

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    kek vatBlack person if you translate a obviously fake document from your subhuman language to polish, it doesn't automatically make it true, especially if it contains schizoshit like:
    >zabici intstruktorzy NATO
    >zabici zolnierze NATO
    >Zabici najemnicy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What exactly was it he was trying to mime into Kielbasa-talk?

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Realistically without shilling for either side, probably 7-12 months. Russia is clearly holding still even though theyre getting shit on. They would find a way it really wouldn't suprise me, but it won't last forever.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The first gulf war is your reference point. That was against peak soviet model army vs peak western military. It has been only downhill since then.

    Realistically only thing allowing the delinquent to frick around right now are da nooks. Without them air campaign would have neutered their teeth since last year

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >air campaign would have neutered their teeth since last year
      wdhmbt?

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The US could wipe out Russia in less than 30 minutes and all it takes is two nuclear submarines. This is a conservative estimate btw.

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Seeing that NATO has only been losing territory against Russia in Donetsk for months

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How many troops will be committed to this "steam roller" ? None of those that attack Mother Russia will return to their homes.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >how fast can NATO steamroll the Russians?
    Depends on what you mean by 'steamroll'
    Remove their air defenses and air capability? Very quickly.
    Conquer territory and hold it?
    Much slower, and depends on how motivated russians get seeing Moscow under siege again.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Oh shit war was announced? Damn, where is all the footage of American A-10s mowing down mobiks, then?

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If we got enough intelligence to do a couple of decapitation strikes? A year max

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    This cope number dosen't become reality just because you write it in polish.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    NATO is a sort of vague amorphous shape. It is responsible for all Russian failures in Ukraine but simultaneously very weak.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If the Russians didn't have nukes, they would've stopped existing entirely in 1991.

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    NATO boots in Moscow by midnight, if we invaded at 6pm, and took a 3 hour nap

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Depends on how much force the USA alone commits to the fight. Doubt Europe-only NATO would have enough staying power to penetrate deep into Russia. But the USA alone could seize the entire country in weeks.

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >NATO losing territory against Russia
    Holy frick I missed the big one and didn't even get drafted? Fricking sucks that you actually have to go out of your way to volunteer to take part in a world war these days.

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It took the US 2 weeks to completely annihilate the Iraq army and airforce in desert shield and storm. If given a similarly sized force for an operation in Ukraine, probably a similar timetable.

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    always hilarious when some dumbfrick vatnik deletes his own cringe out of shame and embarrassment

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Just in case anyone's wondering what it was.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        God bless you anon.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You have glowBlack person mods here now you dumb frick

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        there are no glowBlack person mods here, there are brigaded and orchestrated vatnik raids though, frick you and frick putin

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yet its only the pro-russian comments that are getting deleted somehow.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Because you pro-russian dumbfricks make the worst fricking posts and consistently shit up the board with /misc/-tier schizo nonsense. Shits more acrimonious and ignorant than console wars on fricking PrepHole

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Have you considered that pro Russian comments are bottom of the barrel shitposting? Remember the bioweapon spam that you guys did for a month straight? Remember how you Black folk shit up the board and flooded it with your SLAVDIE conspiracy theories? That kind of behavior is why your kind gets banned.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >GUYS I WASNT ASHAMED NO REALLY
        yeah sure, guess that one stung you, huh?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I'm not the OP nor the other guy, this is my post from yesterday that god deleted by a janny and I don't think the other guy deleted 10 of his posts either

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If we’re talking about neutralizing the Russian threat to Ukraine and inflicting serious enough damage to Russian forces to make them a non-threat for the next decades, couple of weeks.

    If we’re talking about an actual invasion of Russia, somehow assuming that it doesn’t go nuclear, who knows? I mean, I have no idea what would happen to Russian morale in a situation where the existence of their state is actually non-meme threatened, yet they would know that it would be a fricking horrible rapetrain of a war where they would run out of near-peer -tier equipment real fast and then it would be either desperate waves of raggy soldiers or going guerrilla. I’d assume that NATO victory in military sense would be sure in the near-future timespan, simply because Russians really couldn’t hold the line after VVS gets demolished, but I’d imagine a fricking mess of a guerrilla war as an end result.

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The longer the war in Ukraine goes the less time it'd take NATO to conquer Russia.

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how fast is a nuke ICBM?

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Kindly reminder that USA alone has the capability to destroy ~300 hardened targets anywhere in the world within ~5 hours, without the adversary even knowing what hit them. That's just the first salvo from B-2s with 16 JASSM each. This is enough to decapitate Russian command and control and long range air defences, paving way for a campaign of non stop aerial bombing until they surrender. Russia might be able to hit maybe 20-30 NATO targets with nuclear warheads, but that's it. It would take NATO just a few days to literally annihilate Russia with conventional weapons alone. Don't get me wrong, I'm not too happy about it, I mean frick Russia, but I don't think it's a healthy situation when one country has such a colossal military advantage over the rest of the world...

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Shock and Awe 2.0 basically

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    In the current state of the RU army? Well, longer than shills would have you believe, but definitely well under a year. Would also depend on the 3rd party involvement (China, India), which could make things stretch a bit.

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If this happens, It's probably an attack by Russia on the Baltic states. It'd take some months, but NATO combined would wipe the floor with them. Europe along with US would gear up for war production. You'd have western navies come into play, all of their Air Forces and the millions of soldiers. We'd match them in numbers, but lead in tech when it comes to equipment, intelligence, training. But It'd probably end up with nukes, so everyone loses.

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    maximum eight hours

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >witness my 5000 hours of photoshop

    This pretty much sums everything up.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      this doesn't even include other allies like SK, Japan, NZ & Australia if shit got into big boy pissing contest.

      Looking at things, its literally like having the entirety of the football, lacrosse, and rugby teams vs half the anime club + one dude from the wrestling club.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        oops, correction.
        NATO also has the other half of the anime club.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgystan, and Tajikstan are not going o fight for the Russians. It is even worse than your post shows

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    what’s worse - being this, or losing to it?

    vatniks really think “gay black trannies pushed us out of Kherson” is a narrative that makes them look macho and tough lol

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Its not about how fast. Its about how one sided.

    Against the 4th army of the world, it traded at a 1:+100 ratio in men and most kinds of material, and Russia would be much the same. SEAD comes in first, and once people start to draw straws for deciding who will man the AA installation, they'll just leisurely bomb the shit out of every military asset for 3-5 months before they come in with massive combined arms operation and clean out the shellshocked stragglers with minimal losses.

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Two weeks obviously

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    What happened to the bioweapons vatBlack person? Answer the question.

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If it comes down to it? The tanks are already in Podmoskovye.

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >deletes his post out of shame
    Another vatBlack person classic

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Have you considered that maybe you are the one who is wrong?

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *