If China only needs four more years before they are ready to launch a naval invasion of Taiwan, how many years until India would be ready to launch of...

If China only needs four more years before they are ready to launch a naval invasion of Taiwan, how many years until India would be ready to launch of a naval invasion of Sri Lanka?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why not just cross on that land bridge? You are really dumb for real

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah? Go ahead and zoom in on that "land bridge" on Google Maps and see how moronic you are.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Land bridge was broken by hurricane in 1480.

        Hanuman will build another, a 6 laner capable of supporting Arjun MBTs

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Land bridge was broken by hurricane in 1480.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >why not cross a singular bridge that can be easily defended!

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sri Lanka is a fake country built on corruption, as soon as the indian troops enter, they will be welcomed as liberators, the invasion will last 3 days.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Sri Lankans would rather lay down their arms then shot a fellow poo.

      NATO will never understand that.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        the west is divided they won't do anything.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >the west is divided they won't do anything
          The Kremlin has a job offer for you as an advisor

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            all jokes aside, what would the west even do in the event of indian invasion of Sri Lanka? i think India can win this more easily than russia can especially if they have the support of tamil's.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Realistically? Not much. It's just another minor war in a far off place. India would easily win the war. The Sri Lankan government is in ruin, the economy has collapsed, and their armed forces are a joke. They have 60ish T-55 tanks in active service, 90 more in reserve, 30ish T-62s in reserve, a few hundred IFVs and APCs of various types, a total of 150ish towed artillery pieces ranging from 122 to 152s, 110 heavy mortars, and their anti tank weapons consist of LAWs and some Chinesium ATGM I've never heard of.

              The Sri Lankan Air Force consists of various transport assets we do not give a shit about, 10 operational Mi-17s which could potentially be armed, 8 operational Mi-24s, 3 Chinese MiG-21 clones, and 5 Israeli Mirage clones. Outside of these jets, their only actual air defences are 54 Igla MANPADS, and some anti aircraft guns dating back to ww2. India may be shit, but even they could establish air superiority.

              Their navy? 5 frigates and a smattering of smaller boats. Not a factor.

              The main issues would be A. Guerilla resistance, India has already had a bout of the Tamils and it wasn't good for them, and B. China. China would be pissed the frick off. China has been working to establish a submarine base in Sri Lanka. Their whole strategy of controlling trade routes around India requires Sri Lanka. China would likely send aid, if not actual troops.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >What would the west do
              Nothing. No sanctions. It would be framed as a “stabilization” or “peace keeping” in western press. Nobody cares about Sri Lanka in the US and we generally have a positive view on India (for being a non-western country). I always wondered why India doesn’t take Sri Lanka.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >and we generally have a positive view on India
                lol, lmao even.
                Street shitters deserve the nuke.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The mainstream narrative about India is “largest democracy in the world” and they’re the highest earning ethnic group in the US because we mostly get Indian doctors and shit. They’re known for being low crime, high educated ethnic group.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >they’re the highest earning ethnic group in the US
                only because the orientals are fragmented into several countries
                >They’re known for being low crime, high educated ethnic group
                yeah it's called brain drain; anyone with a decent GPA and a modicum of morals fled the country to the land of the free and home of the capitalists; what's left behind are all the dregs and scum of India

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, and my point is that it shapes the view of the average American if the only Indian they meet is a doctor, small business owner, engineer, etc. there’s no Indian street gangs, etc.
                So my point is Americans generally have a favorable view of Indians and India because of the people who immigrated to the US and muh world’s largest democracy.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >and India
                if India continues to ape out over Ukraine that will change

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >That will change
                Maybe. I understand why India is doing what it’s doing. They get low cost oil and they need Russia because of decades of defense deals. They can’t just turn away cold turkey from them. Most Americans aren’t following the war as closely as /k/ autists to know what they’re doing. It’s true that their relationship with Russia isn’t winning favors with western governments.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Of course, the counterpoint to the fact that the average American not knowing what India is up to is that the average American also doesn't give a frick about or have any influence on what the US government's foreign policy, while the ones who actually matter are well aware of India's game of footsies. It'd be one thing to just doing the minimum in exchange for vital goods, but India's government and media do far too much shilling for the vatniks even if you do have some hilarious moments like when they told Putin off at an economic conference, something about how this is no longer the era of warfare.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Average US citizen has little say over foreign policy
                I agree with that and agree that the ones who are important are well aware of what India is doing. I think government officials are and will continue to prioritize India due to the Chinese situation.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yea, they're clearly the lesser evil between the two, but being the lesser evil doesn't clear you to start buying the really fun stuff unlike a trustworthy ally like Japan.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                India is showing that it only cares about India, and only then in a very narrow short term sense. They can't be depended upon to come to the aid of other countries re: China, hence they're no ally only a potential burden. What does the West care if China peals away part of Northwest or Northeast India, it's not as if those border were ever agreed upon by any of the parties anyway there's not even that principal at stake.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >why India is doing what it’s doing
                is because they are a bunch of mercenary fricks who are only concerned in enriching themselves at everybody else's expense, and will not give half a shit (in the designated street) for the principle of the thing. why do you think the Western governments are lukewarm towards them at best? they only mouth platitudes about pseudo-Western values only insofar as they can chisel white guilt gibs about "imperialism". a word which they use like a feminist uses "rape".

                >you disagree with me you bloody benchod bastard?
                >IT'S IMPERIALISM

                case in point

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Sri Lankans would rather lay down their arms then shot a fellow poo.
        Yes. The Sinhalese are well known for the love of their Tamil brothers across the way.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      India had a PM who had similar moronic ideas and ended up getting blown sky-high as a result.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It wasn't because we wanted to invade Sri Lanka though.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No, Srikraine and Indussia will fight for several years over a few inches of territory if there's a war.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >t. Saar Ranjet Gupta
      Good morning sir

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      sir yes please redeem the island sir

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Sri Lanka is a fake country built on corruption
      So is India so perhaps it should be Sri Lanka that invades instead.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Its called Ceylon
    Its called Burma
    Its called Formosa

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Cannot disagree with any of these.

      https://i.imgur.com/ScDPO2y.png

      If China only needs four more years before they are ready to launch a naval invasion of Taiwan, how many years until India would be ready to launch of a naval invasion of Sri Lanka?

      China would probably spank them. Sri Lanka is the archetypal debt-trapped Chinese protectorate.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Just got a call from the Based Department, it's for you.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Its called Bombay, too

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      xplain.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Its called Formosa
      Formosa is the (Western)name of the island, Taiwan is the name of the State

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Not happening. India doesn't care about Sri Lanka. Unlike China India recognizes that they were a bunch of smaller countries before this current state and as such Sri Lanka is not considered Indian clay and really never was. They don't autistically antagonize none Muslim neighbors. It's mainly Chinese arrogance and delusion that makes Taiwan a massive issue.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The frick are you talking about? India is nothing more than a massive LARP that claims that there was an eternal Hindu Empire that covered all of southern Asia, and regularly attack Pakistan on that basis.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >None Muslim
        Learn to read

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I view India in a similar way to Israel. There’s about 1 billion Hindus in the world. India is the only country they’re the majority and it should be a fundamentally Hindu country. The problem is that India has about 300,000,000 Muslims living there too.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    India could literally buy it today.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    India has never invaded another country in it's 6000 year history. Bloodthirsty anglos are projecting their savage violent nature onto their victims, as always.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >India has never invaded another country in it's 6000 year history
      india as a country hasnt even existed for a hundred years, you absolute fricking troglodyte. it was the british who gave the you the idea of "indians"

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Typical talking point from insufferable Hindutva homosexuals. Indians have always acted outside their accepted borders, like every nation of note.
        https://theprint.in/opinion/indians-never-invaded-is-a-myth-guptas-cholas-lalitaditya-muktapida-were-conquerors/1077126/
        Now if you're talking about "India" then that is a polity that did not exist until 1947.

        >Umm akshually you aren't a country until a bucktooth island savage in a top hat says you are
        Reminder that the UK is now classified as a developing economy and Kashmir is India

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          t. Aditya Chakrabortty

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This is not what that anon said. He said that a unified polity is a modern invention if one excludes stuff like Maurya, and the time passed is significant, with all the cultural changes that occurred (included Islam).

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Typical talking point from insufferable Hindutva homosexuals. Indians have always acted outside their accepted borders, like every nation of note.
      https://theprint.in/opinion/indians-never-invaded-is-a-myth-guptas-cholas-lalitaditya-muktapida-were-conquerors/1077126/
      Now if you're talking about "India" then that is a polity that did not exist until 1947.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Nobody wants Sri Lanka, least of all India. The country collapsed last year and makes the average Indian look like a rich oil sheik by comparison

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    wont happen. americans already in taiwan.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe they can get the Sentinalese to help.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    does india even want it?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No. They are very neutral to the nation and it's people and the religion of Buddhism. As long as Sri Lanka doesn't piss them off it can pretty much stay there as is.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        From what I recall Sri Lanka has almost a four way split on religion between Hindu, Buddhist, Christian and Muslim. That’s why they were in civil war for decades

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          About 12% of the country is Tamil and another 10% is Muslim. Christians are a very tiny minority. Most of the country is Sinhalese Buddhists. The north and parts of the east have a Tamil majority. The Sinhalese majority started passing laws that disenfranchised the Tamils. Violence ensued. The tamils started a guerilla campaign in the north, where thick vegetation gave them cover. It was hard to pin them down because the guerillas would blend in with the villagers. The government initially funded some groups to divide and conquer. The government also dragged their feet by not deploying enough resources to win the conflict, partly because they could stoke the terror of war to get votes. Eventually, a group called the LTTE emerged as the victor of the Tamil groups and launched a full-scale war against the government. Started perfecting suicide bombs and started killing politicians, presidents, and even an Indian prime minister after he sent peace keeping troops to fight against the Tamils. They blew up busses, trains and even conducted a bombing run on the capital with ww2 tier self made airplanes equipped with machine guns.

          Eventually they shut down a dam on which much of the country's agriculture depended on. The government appointed a competent general who trained in a British military academy and proved himself against the guerillas. He started breaking the units into small team's and incorporated coin tactics. He ended the 30 year conflict in a few years. There haven't been any successor organizations to the Tamil insurgency and it's been like 14 years without any terrorist attacks. The president who won the war was ousted due to corruption, and the new administration viewed the intel community as a threat to his admin because most of them were appointed during the last admin. He started to replace key members with his lackeys, which decimated the intel communuty. Isis did easter bombings despite being warned by cia and raw due to intel incompetence.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >The government appointed a competent general who trained in a British military academy and proved himself against the guerillas. He started breaking the units into small team's and incorporated coin tactics. He ended the 30 year conflict in a few years. There haven't been any successor organizations to the Tamil insurgency and it's been like 14 years without any terrorist attacks
            They also imprisoned a lot of LTTE financiers, supporters, sympathisers, and Arumugam Bystander Pillai on trumped-up charges. Gitmo ain't nothing compared to an Indian prison.
            t. knower

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >launch of a naval invasion of Sri Lanka?
    I thought Sri Lanka is Chinese territory

    India will need to take on 2.1 million PLA soldiers

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Superpower by 2025 sirs
    so only 2 more years
    Wait sorry, I meant India will do the needful and redem the superpower by 2030
    so only 7 more years.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ponder the aroma

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >If China only needs four more years before they are ready to launch a naval invasion of Taiwan
    source?

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I've traveled pretty much every corner of India, and there's no national assimilationist policy I've ever seen. The conflicts that exist between groups in any region play out locally dependant on whoever has the local upper hand. If Sri Lanka was suddenly a part of India nothing would change re: the political balance there. India is really more like the EU than a nation state, just saying it's a federation doesn't do the insane diversity and particularism of every place justice.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    found the sirslankagay

    Its called Ceylon
    Its called Burma
    Its called Formosa

    based

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Watch RRR and you'll understand the indomitable Hindu spirit

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *