if Argentina was given 200 Cromwell tanks and they brought them to the Falklands would that have changed the outcome of the war?

if Argentina was given 200 Cromwell tanks and they brought them to the Falklands would that have changed the outcome of the war?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Probably not. There was not a lot of things for a Cromwell to shoot at and what there was were decades newer and much, much faster.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      isnt most tank use against infantry?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        With that lousy excuse of an HE shell?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          > assuming the shells pronouns

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Being this obsessed with trannies

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              in my defense 99% of people online I see talking about pronouns and having them in bio are straight libtards and theater type people

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yes, totally

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Charioteers, perhaps. Cromwells, not.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I always like how modern these tanks looked.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Not really. They lost the war in the air and at sea .and to a lesser extent they lacked artillery. If the conscripts they had stationed there were 100% committed to the fight they could have probably beat back the British landings without tanks.
    But to what end? They had no chance of resupply or reinforcement and were occupying a resistant (yet polite) population that wasn't going to share their Sheppard's pie.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    slow transport with 200 cromwells, you say?

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No, they would have gotten stuck in the mud and the UK brought plenty of anti-tank missiles with them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      what if they were dug in like gun emplacements?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They can still be popped by AT weapons and artillery.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Turning a mobile weapon system whose mobility is its single greatest asset into a static emplacement, therefore turning it into an easily eliminated fixed target. Are you by any chance Syrian?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          the implication of the post I was replying to is that the mud would make mobility impossible

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Don't forget that argies already had TAM - Marder IFV with tank turret and L7 cannon.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What are these low effort posts trying to slide?

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No they would have gotten wrecked by harriers.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > cover them in branches and shrubs
      > harriers looking for tanks
      > instead see moving plant growths
      > fly circles in confusion
      > burn all fuel
      > go back to carrier
      > its already 7 bong and time for tea

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >see falkland terrain

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    No, even the CVRTs got very little use. Not armour country.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      would this have worked?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Poor cross country, an ATV set up like that would be a good option though.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    During the Falklands War the Argies had a brilliant idea, to bomb the marines using Lancaster bombers sadly the argie command decided not to.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What Lanc squadrons remained serviceable by that time?

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Cromwells
    >Against Vulcans

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *