>I identify as a Kinzhal hypersonic missile

>I identify as a Kinzhal hypersonic missile

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    How can you shoot something traveling at Mach 5 down?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You see it coming with your superior radar tech and send something out to explode in its path.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        objection: pac3 is hit to kill

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          If the missile is going in a straight line it doesn't really matter what the kill vehicle uses to kill it.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            it matters because hit to kill is cooler

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      LITERAL RADAR COUPLED WITH COURSE PLOTTING FOR INTERCEPTION... THAT THERE MATHMATICS AT WORK

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      by apologizing to the Patriot

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      how can you stop a photon from the sun from hitting your eye if its traveling at light speed?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >How can you shoot something traveling at Mach 5 down?
      Oh shit, new wunderwaffle just dropped!

      >As the RV would be traveling at about 5 miles per second (8,047 m/s; 26,400 ft/s; Mach 24), Sprint had to have phenomenal performance to achieve an interception in the few seconds before the RV reached its target.
      >Sprint accelerated at 100 g, reaching a speed of Mach 10 (12,300 km/h; 7,610 mph) in 5 seconds.

      Wait, hold on a minute...
      >The first test of the Sprint missile took place at White Sands Missile Range on 17 November 1965.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        HIBEX and frens accelerated and went even faster as truly point interceptors.
        >The "HIBEX" (HIgh Boost EXperiment) missile is considered to be somewhat of a design predecessor and competitor to the Sprint missile, as it was a similar high-acceleration missile in the early 1960s, with a technological transfer from that program to the Sprint development program occurring.[15] Both were tested at the White Sands Launch Complex 38. Although HIBEX's initial acceleration rate was higher, at near 400 g, its role was to intercept reentry vehicles at a much lower altitude than Sprint, 20,000 feet (6,100 m), and it is considered to be a last-ditch anti-ballistic missile "in a similar vein to Sprint".[2] HIBEX employed a star-grain "composite modified double-base propellant", known as FDN-80, created from the mixing of ammonium perchlorate, aluminum, and double-base smokeless powder, with zirconium staples (0.125 inches (3 mm) in length) embedded or "randomly dispersed" throughout the matrix.[16]:162–178,G-24

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >400g acceleration
          >4x sprint acceleration
          Holy frick

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            50s-60s American miltech was fricking insane. Russia has nothing for their furious public masturbatory wonderwaffe when the parents of the boomers genuinely were one step away from assembling functional versions of these things.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >radar looks at how missile is moving
      >computer do math very fast
      >computer now know where the missile will be in future
      >interceptor goes where missile will be
      >superduper fast missile bumps into it
      hope that helps

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      How can you, a blubbering moron standing on the sidewalk, get run over by a car travelling on the street at over 30mph?
      You're not gonna tell me that you're capable of running at over 30mph while your poor caretaker runs after you holding you state-mandated helmet aloft?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      By buying American.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I will answer your question with basic math.

      Image a 700kg horse is galloping at 20 miles an hour, and it wants to do a 180 degree turn. That horse has a frick ton of inertia, and its only got its legs to turn round. Thus, the horse takes a while to turn around, and must gradually lose its speed using its legs while excreting a force to the right/left over a significant distance before its completed the turn. Meanwhile if an 80kg human was walking at 3mph, they could just turn around on a dime because they have MUCH less inertia.

      Same logic with hypersonics. Kinzhal weights about 4 tonnes, and a 4 tonne missile travelling at Mach 5 possesses an insane amount of inertia. In order to manoeuvre, it must bounce air in a certain direction over its fins, which as you can guess, takes A LOT of time and air to do. Thus, Kinzhal can't turn for shit. If you have a constant lock on your target and its not taking any evasive action, you can hit sometime travelling at Mach 100, which is why this entire story is such a nothingburger. This is also why hypersonics are a meme, especially against high technology opponents like the USA. Pic especially rel, showing the turning circle assuming a 2g turn on a cruise vehicle travelling at Mach 15 vs Mach 10.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        How high are you? Kinzhal hypersonic missile is the most manuverabe. Literally managed to intercept a much slower patriot missile.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Doubting the Patriot Missile

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Patriot failed to intercept iraqi and houthi scud..

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Damn, it's a shame there have been no improvements made to the system in the past 32 years.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            the houthi one was a couple of years ago..

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/5/saudi-forces-intercept-three-ballistic-missiles-blame-houthis
              https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/2/28/saudi-arabia-intercepts-ballistic-missile-attack-over-riyadh
              https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2021/12/saudi-arabia-intercepts-ballistic-missile-over-riyadh
              https://english.alarabiya.net/News/gulf/2022/03/22/Saudi-Arabia-intercepts-destroys-ballistic-missile-launched-toward-Jazan
              https://crisis24.garda.com/alerts/2022/06/saudi-arabia-air-defense-forces-intercept-al-houthi-launched-missile-targeting-khamis-mushait-june-30
              https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2018/03/26/saudi-arabia-intercepts-missiles-abc-orig-vstop.cnn

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                lol

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >one

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                maybe you should watch the video

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                What about it? A successful intercept of Iranian TBMs, with one PAC-2 interceptor malfunctioning. What's your point?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >one malfunctioning
                >can't read the text in the video
                ok

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                One PAC-2 malfunctioned, and all 7 Iranian TBMs were intercepted by PATRIOT. What more is there to read? Sounds like a major success for PATRIOT.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >major success
                >intercepted 7 missiles
                >by shooting 10 at it, 2 failed and the third of them veered and hit the ground.
                amazing. reminds me of the accuracy of Patriot fiasco after the gulf war.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >2 failed and the third of them veered and hit the ground.
                May I see the two fail? I saw two intercepts, and one veer into the ground. Still shot down 7 Iranian TBMs with shit sandBlack person operators and maintainers. Seems like the gold standard for tactical BM defense.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/why-did-american-patriot-missiles-fail-stop-houthis-attacks-197764
                >But amateur videos that appeared online in the aftermath of the missile skirmish indicate that many of the Patriots exploded in mid-air or veered off course. The errant missiles invoked memories of similar failures involving American-operated Patriots during the 1991 Gulf War and the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
                I guess the nationalinterest is lying as well.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Don't give him any more (you)s he's a moronic gay from /misc/ baiting you all lol

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >nationalinterest
                Might as well post eurasiantimes lmao

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                it was all over the news lmao https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/04/patriot-defense-system-likely-failed-in-saudi-ballistic-missile-attack.html

                >Patriots exploded in mid-air
                You mean what is called an intercept?

                Watch the video and explain to me how one missile's explosion and debris is shown falling 5 seconds after launch. the very beginning of the video.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Patriots exploded in mid-air
                You mean what is called an intercept?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >major success
                >intercepted 7 missiles
                >by shooting 10 at it, 2 failed and the third of them veered and hit the ground.
                Yes, that's what we call a major success. Since when is the definition of success in intercepts a 1-1 ratio of shots to hits? The definition of success is you destroy the raid.
                Are all /misc/Black folk this moronic?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      We know where the missile is because we know where the missile isn't

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      by... intercepting it? You don't need to catch up with it from behind, you're meeting it head on. As long as you can reasonably predict the trajectory (which you can because the faster something moves in the atmosphere the less control authority it has without tearing itself to shreds) you can intercept it with something moving 10 or even 100 times slower than it

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Imperial System vs Colonial System. Russian Mach 5 = 50 White Eagles = US Mach 0.75

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Trying again after you got btfo in the last thread b***h?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      DO NOT REDEEM THE OLD THREAD SIR

      [...]

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >I identify as a Kinzhal hypersonic missile
    >now, somehow I can fly 1000 km
    Why do you would stop there tho? why not self identify with a nuke.

    GONNA NOOOOOOOOOOK

    It's over NAFO bros

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Shootdown was confirmed by the pentagon.
    https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1656019883337949192
    cope and seethe, I don't even know why this is surprising, PAC-3 has been killing Mach 8 maneuvering warheads since 94 or 95.

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    cope + seethe + mald

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous
      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Stop it.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/iXaWQhs.jpg

      https://i.imgur.com/0avhGO5.png

      >Please remove these posts anon, they do not line up with my narrative of an unstoppable hypersonic missile

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/iXaWQhs.jpg

      NOOOOOOP YOU CANT POST THAT
      ITS A HECKIN RUSSIAPHOBIC!

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is the "moskva went to port under it's own power" shit all over again.

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nobody falls for that, moron. The thing that was shot down does not have a nose fuse.
    Continue to cope you Mongoloid subhuman.

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >get btfo'd in old thread

    [...]


    >thread is filled with pictures and posts showing how wrong you are about everything
    >whole thread is basically your tantrum throwing ass getting dragged through a mile of glass shards of truth and facts
    >make a new thread because you can never let go
    oohh armatard

    https://i.imgur.com/D0qUXSJ.jpg

    https://i.imgur.com/iXaWQhs.jpg

    beat me to it

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    But science already debunked this. it was proven that it was a hypersanic missile peer reviewed by scientist all over the world

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Scientist of India much superior sir

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's healthy to role-play as a make-believe fantasy character sometimes.
    Gets the stress out, you know?

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Kinzhal bouyant and moving under it's own power

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    You know they can use the same penetrator/warhead in other munitions, right?
    Britain's Storm Shadow and the US' AGM-154C cruise missiles contains the penetrating BLU-109 warhead used on guided freefall bombs like GBU-24A/B, GBU-27, GBU-31(V)3/B etc.

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Vatniks destroying vatnigs:

    https://t.me/milinfolive/100466
    https://t.me/milinfolive/100467

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    moron learns about unitary warheads. welcome to /k/

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's like the second or third thread where he tries the same shit, so he already learned it, he just hoped fewer or no people would know it in another thread. Didn't work out too well for him.

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    lmao. imagine being so assblasted that you spend all day posting seethe threads

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Alrighty 2 threads where OP got BTFO'd, who's ready for round 3?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Meeeee!

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The sad thing is he or someone else will do the same thing again, hoping there are fewer people around or no one feels like correcting him this time. They always do, sometimes it's just a few hours, sometimes it's a few months or less, but sooner or later one of them will try it again.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      He gave up on making threads on this and started to post it in at least one other thread

      [...]

      instead.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The cum /chug/ger cope in this thread on /misc/ is fricking hilarious:

      [...]

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Screenshot, not going there

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Pls don’t cry OP i’m sure people won’t make fun of your lack of warhead knowledge in your next thread.
    Go ahead.
    Make another one.

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    lmao.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      maybe read the thread and this one

      [...]

      before you post such moronic and denunked shit

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        How is it debunked? you have a guy here claiming they are using the same Betab-500 as a warhead inside the kinzhal. that's how high on copium you are lmao

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >someone mentions something on a sidenote
          >"YOU ALL HAVE BEEN SAYING"
          every time
          okay, you aren't even trying and already becoming defensively aggressive

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Here's the propaganda thought process
            >early report of downing a kinzhal with images
            >airforce denies that any ballistic missiles were in the air that day
            >people start saying that the denial was for OPSEC reasons, So russians don't know that their superweapon can be intercepted prior to the counter-offensive
            >some dude claims that the tip of the wreckage and its curves matches kinzhal's tip
            >random ukie news pick it up and spread it, Pentagon talks about it. OPSEC don't matter anymore
            >now we have more footage of the wreckage but it doesn't match the outer/tip of the missile
            >now its actually an internal penetrator/payload. but just a simple google search shows that neither Iskander nor Kinzhal use an internal penetrator and their inner warhead looks nothing like this new footage, while ignoring the fact that many ballistic missiles don't even need penetrators like cruise missiles.
            >Russians are saying it's a Betab-500, and it really does look like it, so the new tactic is to claim that Kinzhal uses betab-500 as the inner warhead of Kinzhal like Anon here

            https://i.imgur.com/zxZWjrP.png

            You know they can use the same penetrator/warhead in other munitions, right?
            Britain's Storm Shadow and the US' AGM-154C cruise missiles contains the penetrating BLU-109 warhead used on guided freefall bombs like GBU-24A/B, GBU-27, GBU-31(V)3/B etc.
            Choose whatever hill you die on, it will be funny to watch how this gets memory-holed just like the ghost of keev.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              There's no need of memory hole it, Russia probably will launch another Kinzhal with, maybe, the same result.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              > "Choose whatever hill you die on"
              He hasn't been paying attention to Bakhmut

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Russians are saying it's a Betab-500, and it really does look like it
              It really doesn't, the overall shape is similar because they are both hardened penetrator warheads, but literally all of the surface details are different, welds in different spots, BETAB has two half circle mounting points while the Kinzhal has two bolts that go all the way through. The most interesting part is that none of you are even trying to explain this

              https://i.imgur.com/D0qUXSJ.jpg

              https://i.imgur.com/iXaWQhs.jpg

              I wonder why?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                This. The mount points were a dead fricking giveaway lol. OP is a seething thirdie at best and a moronic contrarian /chug/gay at worst

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The most interesting part is that none of you are even trying to explain this

                https://i.imgur.com/D0qUXSJ.jpg

                Maybe because the one on sand is obviously different in size, with its terminal part obviously wider and has an obviously protruding ridge below the first "hole", and it has its rivets outside instead of the "holes for the bolts that go all the way through"?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >obviously different in size
                based on what reference?
                >its terminal part obviously wider
                they are the same shape
                >has an obviously protruding ridge below the first "hole"
                you mean the weld that is clearly present on both examples?
                >has its rivets outside instead of the "holes for the bolts that go all the way through"?
                One side is proud, the other recessed. I know it's a lot to understand, but I have faith in you.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >based on what reference?
                Just compare the different colored tip size and diameter with its own body, in both pictures. its clearly not the same. at best you can argue it's different because the one on sand was actually an Iskander-m.
                >just a weld
                You think its just a weld that caused that massive shadow?
                >one is proud the other is recessed
                just lol, you know that argument can be used as evidence that its a Betab-500, right?

                https://i.imgur.com/G1F2AKM.jpg

                [...]
                [...]
                It's a endless stream of BS and cope. With wrong comparisons.

                You should compare the warhead shown by ukranians with the BETAB-500ShP
                because its tip matches better the warhead.

                Probably they're related developments and the Kinzhal's penetrator is an
                incremental improvement of the BETAB-500ShP to make it work better
                at higher impact velocity.

                *I forgot the pic

                thanks for rotating the stavropol warhead. to show that its diameter and cap size is completely different than the one Ukraine shows.
                >probably related
                >incremental improvement
                whatever

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >thanks for rotating the stavropol warhead. to show that its diameter and cap size is completely different than the one Ukraine shows.
                Should do I make another pic with perspective/photogrammetry estimations just to stfu you?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm reminded of the incident where Russians were moving around TB-2 wreckage and the vatniks could not understand perspective

                >based on what reference?
                Just compare the different colored tip size and diameter with its own body, in both pictures. its clearly not the same. at best you can argue it's different because the one on sand was actually an Iskander-m.
                >just a weld
                You think its just a weld that caused that massive shadow?
                >one is proud the other is recessed
                just lol, you know that argument can be used as evidence that its a Betab-500, right?

                [...]
                thanks for rotating the stavropol warhead. to show that its diameter and cap size is completely different than the one Ukraine shows.
                >probably related
                >incremental improvement
                whatever

                >You think its just a weld that caused that massive shadow?
                Are you an actual moronic or are you just pretending you can't see that the shadow is from the wreckage of the outer body of the missile, which is sitting directly behind, bent around the warhead?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                wew lad, didn't know you can cast shadow at two different directions kek

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm truly surprised that you don't forget to breath.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Im (not) surprised you fell for the israelites war propaganda.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                ad israeliterium

                impressive

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                What the frick is the yellow line supposed to show?
                The sun is on the right from the perspective of the picture. You can even see the back of the piece wrapped around the warhead is shaded, meaning the sun is pretty low when the picture was taken.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                We've reached moon truther levels of denial now.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I have no words to describe how moronic you are

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                pretty sure you're trolling, I'll give you a 6/10 rating and a (You)

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/7ruGKy2.jpg

                Here's the propaganda thought process
                >early report of downing a kinzhal with images
                >airforce denies that any ballistic missiles were in the air that day
                >people start saying that the denial was for OPSEC reasons, So russians don't know that their superweapon can be intercepted prior to the counter-offensive
                >some dude claims that the tip of the wreckage and its curves matches kinzhal's tip
                >random ukie news pick it up and spread it, Pentagon talks about it. OPSEC don't matter anymore
                >now we have more footage of the wreckage but it doesn't match the outer/tip of the missile
                >now its actually an internal penetrator/payload. but just a simple google search shows that neither Iskander nor Kinzhal use an internal penetrator and their inner warhead looks nothing like this new footage, while ignoring the fact that many ballistic missiles don't even need penetrators like cruise missiles.
                >Russians are saying it's a Betab-500, and it really does look like it, so the new tactic is to claim that Kinzhal uses betab-500 as the inner warhead of Kinzhal like Anon here[...]
                Choose whatever hill you die on, it will be funny to watch how this gets memory-holed just like the ghost of keev.

                https://i.imgur.com/vz7zX84.jpg

                lmao.

                It's a endless stream of BS and cope. With wrong comparisons.

                You should compare the warhead shown by ukranians with the BETAB-500ShP
                because its tip matches better the warhead.

                Probably they're related developments and the Kinzhal's penetrator is an
                incremental improvement of the BETAB-500ShP to make it work better
                at higher impact velocity.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/7ruGKy2.jpg

                Here's the propaganda thought process
                >early report of downing a kinzhal with images
                >airforce denies that any ballistic missiles were in the air that day
                >people start saying that the denial was for OPSEC reasons, So russians don't know that their superweapon can be intercepted prior to the counter-offensive
                >some dude claims that the tip of the wreckage and its curves matches kinzhal's tip
                >random ukie news pick it up and spread it, Pentagon talks about it. OPSEC don't matter anymore
                >now we have more footage of the wreckage but it doesn't match the outer/tip of the missile
                >now its actually an internal penetrator/payload. but just a simple google search shows that neither Iskander nor Kinzhal use an internal penetrator and their inner warhead looks nothing like this new footage, while ignoring the fact that many ballistic missiles don't even need penetrators like cruise missiles.
                >Russians are saying it's a Betab-500, and it really does look like it, so the new tactic is to claim that Kinzhal uses betab-500 as the inner warhead of Kinzhal like Anon here[...]
                Choose whatever hill you die on, it will be funny to watch how this gets memory-holed just like the ghost of keev.

                https://i.imgur.com/vz7zX84.jpg

                lmao.

                It's a endless stream of BS and cope. With wrong comparisons.

                You should compare the warhead shown by ukranians with the BETAB-500ShP
                because its tip matches better the warhead.

                Probably they're related developments and the Kinzhal's penetrator is an
                incremental improvement of the BETAB-500ShP to make it work better
                at higher impact velocity.

                *I forgot the pic

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                P.S. The straight band on the nose could be simply to clamp the warhead on place, i'm not sure if it's really capped. Probably it isn't even capped.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >obviously different in size
                >Because one picture is blown up more than the other, so it looks bigger
                You cannot be this moronic. Just accept it, the kinzhal can be intercepted. Deal with it.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >drawing lines on an image that isn't even in the same perspective
      >no fringe at the bottom
      >top of the right is clearly more rounded
      >two rings near where the bolts should go but none on the right.
      clearly different.

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Got it: you want to be pegged by Patriot-chan but then afterwards vociferously deny anything happened.
    You do you, Anon.

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Manually operated lift trucks on a land base are absurd. Proper air forces used motorized bomb lifts since the 1950s.because they're so much faster and combat turn times are critical to producing the max number of sorties. Then there's the utter lack of hardened shelters or even revetments...

    "Jammer":
    https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/195726/mj-1-lift-truck/

    Loading F-16:

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Anon the outer case is missing in the second image.

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    He made another

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    i truly had no idea that memezhal shotdown will cause so much cope

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It’s all hands on deck damage control after this and the “””””parade”””””””

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hypersonic missiles is the only cope thirdie shills have against the overwhelming american military superiority.
      Proof of the US being able to stop those means admitting they're powerless and weak, losing face, etc.

  25. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Hmmmmmm

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Post article.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >already spreading falsified articles to sow doubt

  26. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wow, this is actually armatard isn’t it? It has to be. Only he is both this moronic and this full of very specific knowledge that is also untrue. Most vatniks couldn’t name even a single missile beyond saying S-400 stronk and most would also be able to tell how shadows work. Plus this is aviation related. I think the king has finally returned for his crown

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      SU-57 rurned out to be shit, T-14 turned out to be shit, SU-75 is shit. The only thing he had left to keep him from an heroing was Kinzhal. It may have been an unreliable 70s era relic, but at least the US couldn't stop it. Well, until they could. This finally broke him.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        they still have the magical armageddon nuke torpedo

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        He was chimping out on other boards in 2021 too, that’s how people found his reddit/quora/various boomer aviation forum accounts. He sometimes chimps out about how based Roscosmos is, for example.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Source?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            I was one of the ones who found it kek. He just straight up posted his reddit. He actually posted a subreddit he created, iirc it was something like “r/PrepHoleVsReddit” while trying to… I don’t really know, it was bizarre. But I looked up the username because there was only one person posting in the whole sub, and it turned up accounts and former accounts all over the internet, mainly on places like

            Yeah, he's on F-16.net and another aviation forum I visit. He's fricking everywhere doing the same shit over, and over, under hundreds of different SNs. Crazy.

            F-16.net and Quora. Looking through the posts it was obviously Armatard, constantly shilling for Russian aircraft and getting basic facts like the curvature of the earth, unit conversion and how radar jamming works wrong. But always with huge paragraphs and citations. Username was panzerfaust1 but he misspelled panzerfaust, I can’t remember how he misspelled it right now. It was eye opening, years of shilling across every platform imaginable, creating multiple accounts to agree with himself sometimes. I’m way too lazy to go digging for my screencaps rn

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              On the aviation forum, he would always link to some Chinese uni student's Quora page for math and theories a lot.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >I’m way too lazy to go digging for my screencaps rn
              No, I want to see those screencaps. Please go fetch them.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                NTA and i also don't have screencaps, but i got something better, the thread on /k/ where he was soft doxed with all the stuff you want to know, start reading here: https://desuarchive.org/k/thread/51685527/#51689633
                It starts slow, but then it accelerates pretty fast until the mods sadly put an end to it.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Lmao the way armatard immediately sperged out and tried so hard to bury it, comedy gold. Yeah that’s the shit I was referring to. You can really tell it’s definitely legit because of some of the reactions to it from definitely not armatard that are super organic, made by real /k/ posters

                Armatard stopped posting after this. I thought it was because of the war but maybe getting exposed spooked him. He never ever returned to that PrepHole general again I can tell you that. And he purged some of the stuff I found pretty quickly, namely the reddit shit.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                So his name is Jeff Jaworski, interesting. What's Dennis full name?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Nah it’s not, he used a bunch of names on those forums, all eastern yuro. IIRC he’s Romanian though, he had a bunch of posts on r/Romania in Romanian. No way a non Romanian is learning that shit lmao. But I might be getting him mixed up with a different lolcow from that general who posted his reddit

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I remember some vatBlack person posted a pic with Romanian filename. Could it be the same guy?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                No, that was just a fake name he used on Quora, read the whole post chain in the archive thread, there is also some other name he had on Quora. Dennis is another case, he's living in Germany pretty active on PrepHole and his posting time doesn't match up with Armatard who seems to post from the time zone of the Americas.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, he's on F-16.net and another aviation forum I visit. He's fricking everywhere doing the same shit over, and over, under hundreds of different SNs. Crazy.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        The blow wouldn't have been that hard had he acknowledged that the Kinzhal was just a glorified air-launched TBM, but noooooooo, it's a hypersanic, uninterceptable, muh Mach number big! etc. etc.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        There's still Zircon which might as well not actually exist, but that's probably even better because you can't disprove it either.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Su-75 doesnt even exist for it to be shit, it never progressed beyond a show room mockup

  27. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't even understand what is going on. Why do I keep seeing these threads?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bunch of Anons trying reaaaaaly hard to use that "firehose of falsehood" technique because the penetrator of a hypersonic missile that has similar parts to other Russian crap kinda sorta (in the right light) looks like it's a part of a non-hypersonic weapon.
      Y'know, after it's exploded and crashed into the dirt at terminal velocity, with most of it's outer casing stripped off in the process.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Oh so this is them trying to make out the hypersonic didn't get shot down. Right. I get it now. Thanks.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Bunch

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        The strange part is that it's a done deal.
        All the Russian propaganda channels with any shred of credibility in Russia already confirmed it happened.
        It's not even cope at this point.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          That’s how you know it’s armatard

  28. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The warhead may very well could be a modified Betab-500 penetrating bomb, as using off the shelf components in missiles isn't unheard of.

    The JSOW-1A for example uses a modified Mk82 bombs as its warhead.

  29. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because you get shot down?

  30. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    SORRY, WE DIDN'T KNOW HYPERSONICS COULDN'T BE SHOT DOWN

  31. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    That is, purely theoretically, some kind of Nato air defense system can bring supersonic down.
    Of course, we are talking about shooting down single targets, today not a single air defense of the planet will beat off a group attack with hypersonic.
    But that's for today, and tomorrow will be tomorrow.
    In Ukraine, Kinzhals have been using for a year, so finding the wreckage from it is not difficult. And not all ammunition works properly, so relatively intact parts can also be found. It is difficult to figure out that this is exactly the Kinzhal, and not the Iskander, for example, and given the huge number of missile modifications, this task is not an easy one, even for a specialist.
    The whole Pentagon could not determine what is what in the demonstrated pile of garbage and stupidly show a picture of the objective control of the downing (what they shot down there), but for normies it will do.

    This war is unique. The main battle is on the Internet. It is here that they shoot down missiles, ask for shells, kill hundreds and thousands of enemy soldiers, hold and seize territories, impose some kind of sanctions and draw lines of all colors.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >We're only losing on the internet
      Is this the current Russian cope?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why is it so hard to believe they shot one down? Why waste so much time and effort trying to discredit something that'll later claimed to be not such a big thing when it keeps happening? I give you a hint: When Russia and its cheerleaders constantly lie and are caught doing and promoting immoral things, then there is a natural counter reaction to it. Yes, Ukraine lies, yes, not everything turns out to be right, but when you look at it objectively and with all the stuff vatniks and prorussians kept saying in the past and now, it is kinda obvious what vile group they are.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        It is not hard to believe in this, any equipment can be intercepted, especially with satellites and NATO intelligence.
        But as soon as you have a little doubt, ask for more tangible proof, you go out to discuss the shape of a rocket or a warhead, you are immediately attacked by a pack of angry people and they call you Rusniger or vatnik or kgb operative, as if the very possibility of discussing is already closed and its done - follow the main line. It's been hard on this site lately.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          I find it unsettling that I can spot a Russian just from how they construct their English sentences.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >It's been hard on this site lately.
          Feel free to go back to Facebook.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >It is not hard to believe in this
          But why do vatniks make such a fuzz about it? Why do people like you don't recognize it and act accordingly. The vatniks are the reason why you get attacked, it's not the other way around, they fake being you to shill their shit, the only one you should actually be mad at is them. But you don't even mention it unless there are consequences for you for their actions, but then completely ignore their foul play that led to it. What a great "neutral" poster you are, very organic.

  32. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They’re not sending their best, folks. It’s not even close

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Lmfao OP is a twattergay. Mods clean this shit up

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        No, this thread should be stickied, the humiliation of the vatniks in it has been immense

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >AAAAAAA HELP ME JANNIES MY VATBlack person ASS IS ON FIRE

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Funniest ending would be discovering Russians with Attitude is armatard

  33. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >what is a fairing

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Do you think the person you're replying to has even the faintest idea about anything relating to engineering or weapons?

  34. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *