I cannot wait to see this great western wunderwaffe to be BTFO just like Leopards & Bradleys.
I cannot wait to see this great western wunderwaffe to be BTFO just like Leopards & Bradleys.
I cannot wait to see this great western wunderwaffe to be BTFO just like Leopards & Bradleys.
>great western wunderwaffe
>spare NATO equipment from the 80s
Do vatniks really?
>Do vatniks really?
They have nothing else and really need something to take their mind off of well... everything.
The concept of a low-cost, dependable, easy to maintain and logistics-friendly machine might as well be alien tech in the Russian mind.
The F-16 isn't amazing because of cutting edge tech. It's amazing because unlike slavshit, it works.
It also special because exist in quantities above 12.
>Wunderwaffe
>Entered service in 1978
OP is a false flagger
This.
Ukie shills are off the hook.
Areed.
t. John from Idaho oblast
Oh, look.
It's OP.
Strange how these people always forget HIMARS. Probably doesn't even exist in their heads, anymore, lest they suffer a psychotic breakdown.
and yet ukrops still can't win
try a different wunderwaffe, chud
Lmao, how far the goalposts have moved. In the first days, Kiev falling within weeks was considered a given by vatnigs. Now, everything but the total collapse of the Russian state is somehow a win?
Unironically yes, the Russian line is that they're fighting the combined forces of NATO in direct conflict.
You're asking this of the people who celebrate the Russo-Japanese War as a "win" because the Japanese were rioting that the peace treaty their government signed didn't rape Russia hard enough?
The fact they aren't being driven into the sea and slaughtered to a man is win for the 2nd army of the word
Systems produced in large numbers over a period of decades aren't wunderwaffe, gayron. The term refers to hyped systems only built in tiny quantities and that don't live up to their own claims, for example:
>Armata
>Terminator
>Kinzhal
>Su-57
You could probably put Zumwalt in the wunderwaffe category, but I can't think of anything else in Nato that qualifies for that description
Put the Seawolf subs in too.
Nah, as far as anyone can tell the Seawolf class actually does live up to its touted performance
Zumwalt definitely belongs there.
>DDG A THOUSAND!
>STEALTH SHIP!
>RAAAAILGUNS!
There is a difference in my opinion. The Zumwalt is a combination of many, many new technologies. The way I see it, its place as a technology demonstrator is invaluable and impressive nonetheless. 12 Su-57s, however many Terminators, however many Armatas is in no way comparable to three 180 meter long "Destroyers". Three ships of this magnitude are actually capable of performing tasks, and the capabilities offered by all of the technologies are not seen in any other current military vessels.
Procurement programs aren't really black and white all the time in terms of "failing" or "succeeding". If you call the US Army's various attempts to replace the M4 complete failures, the Zumwalt would be a half failure.
Perhaps the OICW?
Nah, no real resources were sunk into that one. A wunderwaffe has to at least exist
>brings up tranies unprompted
It really is rent free huh
>great western wunderwaffe
didn't know they were gonna send raptors to ukraine.
>just like Leopards & Bradleys
And HIMARS, right?
xolxol shill are so fucking retarded
>inb4 goalpost moving
Is this some false flag trolling?
>Is this some false flag trolling?
>retarded pigger shill already memoryholed the multiple destructed himASS
How's it feel living in a fictionalized reality of your own design
These have to be shitposts right? Surely even Russians, as backwards as they are, can't be this retarded?
kek I remember this one, it's even better because they missed the actual target
>kek I remember this one, it's even better because they missed the actual target
another gay NAFO bot that doesnt know our weapon systems can actually hit our target, unlike himars
>Doesnt know the difference between M142 and M1078
.>M1085a1 P2 not m1078 my bad
Please tell me you morons aren't this new as to not spot an obvious shitposter. And before you come back at me, the fact that you're even replying to him is proof.
Anon, shitposting is like an onion. It has many layers.
Seems like they use about 3 rockets per week now and make sure get all of them on video
>& Bradleys
Haven't bradleys been doing way better than most people here thought?
I clearly remember anons saying that the bradleys would be useless and right now they are the most important combat vehicle for the ukranians.
You don't need next gen tech against a 3rd world country army and equipment.
it turns out that if a thunder run lasts long enough even an F-16 becomes de facto a NATO wunderwaffle
>wunderwaffe
>the F-16 was literally designed to be a cheaper, lighter, mass produced alternative to the F-15
Are you ok? Do you have brain damage?
Then again I guess anything made this side of last century is a wonderweapon by Russian standards.
>F-16
>Wunderwaffe
Lol, the absolute state..
I refuse to believe anyone who unironically says 'wunderwaffe' is not a russian
F16 wasn't meant to be wunderwaffe even when they were new. Much less forty years later. It's beauty lies in the cost efficiency and mass production.