How would America fare if it tried to invade Russia?

How would America fare if it tried to invade Russia?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Russia would bend the knee to the Marvel Alliance

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      accurate.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Total Zister Genocide

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Probably fine.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ignoring nukes, excellent in the short term, poorly in the long term. Take Moscow but quickly relearn that trying to hold on to a population that doesn't want you in control of them or trying to get an entire people to change their values to match yours just doesn't work. As we should have learned from the middle east.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Russians have no fight in them. They're a bunch of beaten dogs that will bow to whoever is in power.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Military hardware is still going to get stolen and vandalized, they're never going to put effort into building the Western democracy America would try to force on them. Resistance may not take the exact same form as it did in the middle east, but it'd still be a money pit with no hope of anything ever coming out of it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Ignoring nukes,

      https://i.imgur.com/BkbDoxZ.jpg

      How would America fare if it tried to invade Russia?

      >How would America fare if it tried to invade Russia

      it would lose the entirety of its naval forces, surface and sub, and most of its aircraft along with most of its land forces. All military bases out of USA would be destroyed. Almost all embassies would be destroyed. All naval battle groups would be destroyed within a very small amount of time.

      Ignoring nukes, and all other weapons of that kind.

      Amish would survive though.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        oh Lord anon, you can't do that to me
        the FAA called pissed that I launched my sides into orbit without flight clearance.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Take Moscow but quickly relearn that trying to hold on to a population that doesn't want you in control
      Comparing sand chads to servile monkeys

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        See

        Military hardware is still going to get stolen and vandalized, they're never going to put effort into building the Western democracy America would try to force on them. Resistance may not take the exact same form as it did in the middle east, but it'd still be a money pit with no hope of anything ever coming out of it.

        Even a passive resistance would make continued occupation hell. You need a population that's gung-ho about being reformed to make it worthwhile. It happened with post WWII Japan and we're still high on that working even though it'll probably never work again.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It wasnt the population it's that Japan had a working bureaucracy and the Us mostly kept it intact. So everyone was still working under the same structures just with a US Army commander on top instead of the emperor. That's why afghanistan is such a shitshow but Iraq is far more stable. It's a hard balance to get a puppet popular enough to not spawn more revolutions

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Japan also had the Emperor endorse the US stuff. So it was a flip from expecting to be tortured by US pigs for losing to the Emperor saying "hey these guys are alright, let's play along".

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              At a museum in one of the tiny island's off the last coast I read that the women were given cyanide pills because they were worried American's would rape them to death(because it's what maps did to prisoner women), and instead mixed race marriages mean the island is like 20% Irish descended now lmao.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Well the only context in which a country would try to invade the US is after it had already been hit with probably 100 nuclear bombs.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      read the op again

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    100% casualty rate. Russian women would suck the dicks right off their pelvises in exchange for a green card.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >invade russia

    will never happen no matter how much vatniks want to dream. the simple truth of the matter is nobody wants russia, they want russia to frick off and leave them alone. russia will never be conquered simply because nobody wants to deal with russians afterwards.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This but

      https://i.imgur.com/BkbDoxZ.jpg

      How would America fare if it tried to invade Russia?

      depends on scope. Invade to remove monke? They'd fare very well. Taking it over? Poorly.
      It's very hard to hold territory with civilians that hate you but it's also a big modern no no to force people to move or genocide them

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Depends. If nukes are involved, it would go badly. maybe the US could deploy some kind of advance "Iron Dome", Aegis systems, and other anti-ICBM systems, but could never get them all. So while the US would "win" in the long run if it really really wanted to, it would probably take too much damage to make it worth it.

    If nukes are excluded, the US would probably be successful. Just include cheap vodka, food, and economic opportunities with the invasion. Take full advantage of collaborators and setup a new "legitimate" regime as soon as possible.
    I wonder if you payed the Wagner group enough, if they would turn against the russian government?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I wonder if you payed the Wagner group enough, if they would turn against the russian government?
      Just imagine the most Hollywood CIA stereotype dude saying to them "Think about how much your government pays you to die. We'll pay you double to live."

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    For what purpose. Destroying its military amd economy while encouraging ethnic rebellion against the government would be far more successful.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Moscow in three weeks

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The US wouldn't invade Russia
    Instead the plan is destroying Russian armed forces until they are incapable of conventional aggression
    Invading Russia does not fare

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    not well lets be honest
    not like we even have to anywyas
    >inb4 vatnik

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They wouldn't. They'd just kill Russians and then let the state collapse.

    >pic related

    If you actually invade you're assuming responsibility for the country afterwards.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Could the archetypal western society and soldiery of the US withstand the onslaught and horrors witnessed by Russians and Ukrainians for the past one and half years?
    I highly doubt a western army and society can stomach real war.
    > t. quasi westerner

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      WW2 says 'yes.' They wouldn't have to though, because the US actually has PGMs, tanks that can reverse, and useful airplanes.
      In a strictly conventional war the US would've concluded this thing in summer and all that'd be going on now is executing government officials and deciding which American companies get monopolies over which resources.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What does WW2 have to do with 2023?
        Is the american society of 1930s the same as the contemporary?
        I'm from a much delayed/ rougher western society and can adamantly state that we in no way measure up to our ancestors of the 30s, 40s in terms of corporeal and mental fortitude and hardiness.
        My point revolves around collective societal fortitude to withstand the impact of all out war and don't really care for tech banter. I can't see how degenerate zoomers can hold it together for years in a warzone equivalent to Ukraine.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      All those ukie zoomers look like they can fight and that's good enough.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I would gladly observe the corn fed American society test its' advertised mettle in the Ukrainian hellscape. Believe you me, anon.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      America would exert such incredibly overwhelming air superiority that Russia would never get another artillery round off and turn the theater into a cushy one sided war like we did in the Middle East. US casualties would be in the margin of error to the point background suicide rate is higher than death in the line of duty. The biggest daily struggle is coping with the fact we only flew over a Burger King truck but they want a Big Mac.
      America can't stomach war like we're seeing in Ukraine NOW, but it doesn't matter because that's not what war looks like once America's fricking hilarious number of aircraft and carriers get involved.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It would have no purpose like trying to carjack a bum pushing an empty shopping cart. Russia has already self-inflicted all the damage.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >you may have decapitated the government and destroyed 98% of our military but you didn't completely take over the country so we won
    kek i can hear it already

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yes this is the ukrokope as they wither away their soldiers at bakhmut soon they will have no army left and the ruling regime will collapse

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *