how will Russians be able to take the Pisky Superfortress? is it impregnable?

how will Russians be able to take the Pisky Superfortress? is it impregnable?

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What's even left in there at this point?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Well he's not wrong. Russia squandered the opportunity to pull off shock and awe in the first days of the war because they thought this would be like the USSR in czechoslovakia and tried to win the hearts and minds of the population. Now that they know it's a real war they are launching everything they have, to little effect since the ukies are ready for it

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Man good old Wargame. It felt preddy good when you actually managed to pull off the VDV move

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          crush the communists

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Vatnik, the Russians were launching unguided munitions the entire war and launching cruise missiles at apartments days in. Once they realized the only people in Ukraine who wanted their corruption were in Crimea and the bydlo republics, they resorted to what they did in Chechnya and Syria. Also, I'm not sure how the U.S. supposedly spams missiles for 4 weeks when Baghdad fell in 3 weeks from the start of the war.

        https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-02-26/frightening-moment-a-missile-hit-a-residential-building-in-kyiv/100864932

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this is accurate though, in Russian surgery the operating doctor begins by getting drunk and randomly stabbing the patient all over the body before the very special operation can commence.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Delay fuses. They need more penetration.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Tac nuke.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Tiktac nukes

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >muh NOOOOOKS
      use one and even your pimp Xi will help the West turn your country into an irradiated crater

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      but anon Pesky is 4 miles from Donetsk, wouldn't that also destroy most of...
      oh right no yeah I agree, nuke that bitch

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Looking at how those people are treated and equiped by the ruskies, I wouldn't even be surprised if that was acceptable collateral damage to them.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it's crazy cause vatnik twitter shills how the UA "volksturm" keep getting captured and then they cant take the fucking village that they've erased with TOS and 152 the entire time.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Pisky offensive was just a fient , the village has been given back to Ukraine as a gesture of good will. The real goal was the village's Eastern outhouse, so the Russians could start shitting in private.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >how will Russians take Mariupol
    >how will Russians take Popasna
    >how will Russians take Severodonetsk
    seeing a pattern yet?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That cities bleed russia dry i dont think they have manpower to take another mid size city

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      So what you’re saying is two more months and mighty russia will take the metropolis that is the rubbles of the village Pisky?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >how will Russians take Kiev
      >how will Russians take Odessa
      >how will Russians take Kharkov
      I'm not saying Russians won't capture Pisky, but you have gone from capturing the enemy capital in a week to fighting for a month over an irrelevant village that nobody lives in and is on the border of Donetsk

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That’s because Russia went from fighting Ukraine to fighting NATO American special forces

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Russians would rather tell themselves that NATO is intervening directly in Ukraine and Monke can do nothing about it than admit that the strong Russian bear has been reduced to WW1 warfare by a country they consider beneath them.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          NATO troops are actually in your house right now. But if anyone asks you didn't hear that from me...

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I want to cuddle with my own nato SoF tonight :3

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              same 🙂

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          And they Russia has yet to kill a single NATO soldier lmao

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Where is the evidence

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Russian casualties: over 40k
          >NATO: Has not arrived yet

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Notice how the cities get progressively smaller and it takes longer for Russia to capture them?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The vatnik fears the fish village (population 6)

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I've seen conflicting figures about that, from 9 people to 0

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          There were 9 people in 2019 year population census, but they moved on once all this started

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >seeing a pattern yet?
      Each one took an exponentially longer time to take while also being smaller than the previous place?
      So, in two months or so after capturing Pisky, they're gonna spend the rest of the year capturing some dude's back yard?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's over, hohols
        The protein is folding
        The electron is spinning

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >seeing a pattern yet?
      Yeah.

      1. Spend thousands of soldiers and hundreds of pieces of equipment to take a small town.
      2. Realise that there's a 100 more of those to take.
      3. Realise you just wasted 3 month on a 3km advance.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The thing is they have over a million soldiers, more equipment than all of NATO combined and give a fuck about mass casulaties so can take Ukraine a piecemeal. Remember that USA is so scared of Russian nuclear might tha they still refuse to provide ATACMS.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >more equipment than all of NATO combined

          LMAO, suuure. If you count all the rusted-out wrecks in the ass-end of Siberia perhaps.

          Well, guess what? At the current rate? No, they won't take Ukraine piecemeal. Becuase at the current rate, the Ukrainians will have exterminated every single last military-age male Russian alive before then. And good fucking luck trying to "not give a fuck about mass casualties" when it's literally your entire army and every able-bodied conscript avaiable to you that's become mass casualties.

          Remember that outside delusional vatmoron propaganda the USA are so "scared" that they've literally written into law that they will provide effectively infinite weapons and funding to the Ukrainians for the duration of this war, no matter if it will take months or decades to end it.

          >keeps the absurd amounts prototype shit
          Unlike USA, they usualy finish their prototypes sooner or later like this one
          https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/russia-is-working-on-a-new-anti-ship-ballistic-missile-report

          LMAO. Just like their vapourware Armata, their vapourware SU-57, their dozens upon dozens of vapourware warships, all their vapourware superweapons etc.

          The only thing Russia ususally finishes when it comes to miltiary prototypes is their propaganda campaigns to hype them up.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Becuase at the current rate, the Ukrainians will have exterminated every single last military-age male Russian alive before then.
            More like Russians will exterminate all Ukrainian fighting age males because they have much bigger population, stronger firepower and Ukrainian demographics are even shitter than Russian with the majority of population being old people.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Well, they couldn't be reasoned with, so now they get plan B.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              cool story bro

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >. Just like their vapourware Armata, their vapourware SU-57
            Not vaporware. They will produce them when the time is right now they have more pressing expenditures.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You are joking right? I’m assuming you are a troll and not a vatnog but if you are…

              The best time to build wunderwaffles was a decade ago, the other best time would be now, when you are at war. But you won’t because Russians fail at everything save the suffering they cause themselves.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They prioritize nuclear wunderwaffes. They already produce Su-57 and Armata is too expensive to waste it in Ukraine. It will be ready when Russia is prepared to destroy NATO conquer Europe.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Russia has virtually endless artillery and shells. They can do it for decades to come and produce more.

                >Literally how, do you honestly think it is 1914 and you can just draft a million men into the front?
                Russia can do it but they are winning anyway so no reason to do it for now.

                those dead paratroopers really jogging your nogging eh mr.shitskin? or was it the bridge massacre? or still mourning planes in crimea? or dugin's whore? damn. it's getting harder and harder to guess what vatmorons cry over these days. i miss simple times when it was clear the tears were about moskva or pontoons. now so much awful shit is happening to rusgays it's impossible to know what the shilling is all about.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >They prioritize nuclear wunderwaffes
                They have enough of those already built. Focussing on making more nukes or nuke delivery vehicles over making things like modern jets and modern tanks would betray an absolute brainlet level of priority allocation

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >It will be ready when Russia is prepared to destroy NATO conquer Europe

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >They already produce Su-57 and Armata is too expensive to waste it in Ukraine.
                To waste? Not a lot of confidence in your army.
                >It will be ready when Russia is prepared to destroy NATO conquer Europe.
                You just said it couldn't survive Ukraine but it'll take on F-22;'s and F-35's. lol

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >The thing is they have over a million soldiers
          The thing is they don't. They're offering prisoners shortened sentences by sending them straight to the front.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >The thing is they have over a million soldiers
          And what fine soldiers they are!

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            they look like a bunch of homeless bums of the streets of Moscow

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Russia has mobilized its reserves in full, which ammounts to a little over 2 million personnel, at least officially.
          Also officially, less than 500k of that is "soldiers".
          During peacetime, Russia has roughly 1 million armed forces personnel. And again, only ~300k of that is "soldiers".

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I love how the Russians have somehow resorted to WWI tactics and strategy in the Year of Our Lord 2022.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      So close yet so far.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >spend months bleeding themselves dry only to finally take ruins after Ukies pull out
      Yup

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >how will Russians take Popasna
      >how will Russians take Severodonetsk
      I barely remember those being mentioned at all actually?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        wow fucking awesome, 6 months you took Pospana (where the fuck is this shit) and Severcuntwhatthefuck, you must be so proud of yourself, Russian army

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      So another month or so for 1 village?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >how will Russians take Mariupol (population: 400k)
      >how will Russians take Severodonetsk (population: 100k)
      >how will Russians take Popasna ( population: 10k)
      >how will Russians take Pisky (population: 0)
      >seeing a pattern yet?
      Huh, I wonder what this pattern must be?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, Russians will take Piskpopsivichol (population: -10,000), and will be annihilated by anti-slavs.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The other pattern is that 90% of the population and buildings were gone by the time they took those.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The new pattern will be killing their own "russian" civilians in occupied areas and claiming victory

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      At what cost?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Ukraine can easily replace tens of thousands killed and maimed
        Literally how, do you honestly think it is 1914 and you can just draft a million men into the front?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Literally how, do you honestly think it is 1914 and you can just draft a million men into the front?
          Russia can do it but they are winning anyway so no reason to do it for now.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You forgot about Kiev.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      In two months Russia will have to do another "tactical pause" and bleed manpower and vehicles like crazy? If Russia keeps winning victories like this, there won't be a Russia left at the end of this war.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >how will Russians take Mariupol?

      I never saw anyone saying this, I saw people mocking how long it was taking (Even British intelligence thought it was days from collapse in April), but nobody seriously suggesting they wouldn’t take Mariupol.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Congratulations, they might have taken 5 houses and some chicken sheds to plunder. They shan‘t forget the washing machines

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      /k/ope

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Zeethe

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It’s a pity the R in HARM is radiation and not retardation because if it was you wouldn’t be around to post.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Post toilet seats

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Pisky is confirmed 100% in Russian control.
    Forgive my skepticism but they’ve said that before

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    It's been confirmed to be 100% taken 8 times already. You must forgive my scepticism.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      800% TAKEN, THE GLORY OF RUSSIA IS UNHEARD OF!!!

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >village of 8 people
    Next they will spend half a year to capture a playhouse right next to border

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It will soon fall, just like Siversk, which the anti-fascists of the DPR confirmed to be liberated in early July.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50501241

    How will Pootin manage Mother Russias’ toilet seat shortage ?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They will just steal more from Ukraine.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Didn’t Georgians report that Russians were stealing washing machines during their war?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yea because washing machines are a strategically important asset, so Babuschka at home can instead spend her time waiting in line and buying Troja toilet cleaner for her sons to get drunk.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    At worst, Russia will reach Slavyansk-Kramatorsk, and that is an entirely different beast compared to Pisky or Bakhmut.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Thing is, back in March the general consensus was that Kramatorsk/Sloviansk line would end up being the Ukies primary line of defence in Donbass and the Russians would push them there by the end of the month, mid April at the latest. It is now the end of August...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Even the biggest NATO shills like ISW thought the Russians would be fighting over Slavyansk-Kramatorsk by mid July.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Nobody expected Russians to be this depleted AND send all their capable troops to fight off a nonexistent counteroffensive.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Guess that's why they're hammering not losing kherson and desperately trying to make it into a propaganda victory, it's their main operation right now.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Kiev was a feint
            >100% losses of VDV battalions was feint
            >Kherson non-counteroffensive was not a feint

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    DPA reported they already did, they hit it with the TOS-1 and walked in.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >and walked in
      may I see it?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        No

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Speaking of.... Did the TOS-1 prove to be another useless wunderwaffe? The only reports I've seen of them being in the war was when they were abandooned during the first few weeks. I suppose it's short range and tank chassis makes it incompatible with Russian "logistics"

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        it proved to be great propaganda tool to inflate Russian kill count
        >lob in general direction of enemy
        >declare several hundred dead because TOS killed everyone that "was" there

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The TOS is what they pretend HIMARS is like.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >The TOS is what they pretend HIMARS is like.
            TOS is completely different. It's a short-range mass destruction weapon. for destroying cities and trenches

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              GMLRS can be used for those purposes, far more effectively and at longer ranges. If you're willing to spare the cases that is

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >5 of 6 craters evenly spaced and perfectly targeted on a trench line
                >1 of 6 just sort of chilling off to the side

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Pretty sure thats just them hitting the corner.
                God i fucking love the western MIC and its products.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I will never shittalk the US MIC again.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Thats fucking outrageous.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Made it back to port under its own power!

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/ynp2Nee.jpg

                Pretty sure thats just them hitting the corner.
                God i fucking love the western MIC and its products.

                Christ

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >GMLRS can be used for those purposes, far more effectively and at longer ranges. If you're willing to spare the cases that is
                HIMARS can makes a few small craters, TOS kills everything in a few hundred meters.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >TOS kills everything in a few hundred meters.
                Hilarious joke. Unironically the TOS-1 is ultimately a wunderwaffe that finds more use in media than in actual combat.

                You wouldn't be saying that when a few cases of GMLRS AW hit your trench with pinpoint accuracy. The tens of thousands of tungsten projectiles in each warhead turning its inhabitants into red mist.
                The TOS-1 is unguided (also inaccurate), short ranged, and highly vulnerable to counter battery fire. Its basically a glorified, factory made, thermobaric IRAM.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >smartest russian

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Isn't the whole point of TOS-1 to be a terror weapon for sieges anyway? Based on what I've read about it it was designed to flatten disobedient cities rather than fulfilling a battlefield purpose and would be useless in a shooting war with NATO.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Slow, heavy steel can stuffed full of incredibly powerful bombs
        >Short range so has to get close to the front lines
        >In a war famous for ambushes
        >Against an enemy armed with tens of thousands of the most advanced AA systems

        I would desert faster than you could say "20% of Russia's population doesn't have indoor plumbing"

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >the most advanced AA systems
          I meant AT systems*

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >the most advanced AA systems
          I meant AT systems*

          Should definitely be turned into a UGV

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >I would desert faster than you could say "20% of Russia's population doesn't have indoor plumbing"
          This dude gets it
          The guys that served on similar shit basically told me they would ABANDOOON the first sign of shit getting dicey

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        No, it's a useful weapon. Short range massive HE rocket barrages are a successful weapon dating back to WW2, despite being re-forgotten after each war because they're unglamorous and simplistic.

        It's simply that the short range and psychological effects make it an easy to hit priority target so few survived the initial months.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Thermobarics are massively overhyped like every other Russian wunderwaffe.
        They serve a niche of killing infantry holed up in residential buildings without having to siege them.
        This was mostly a response to Chechnya and the follow up wave of terrorist cells popping up.
        Making rocket artillery but WOW THERMOBARIC no longer fills that niche, and is actually inferior in almost all relevant metrics to regular rocket artillery.
        So yes, it's a meme weapon.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          But when the US Air Force did it obviously it was fucking perfect in every regard with no counter whatsoever.

          These posts proliferate on this board like mould.
          >I thought Russian weapons were made of pure magic
          Then you're an idiot
          >but now I realize that that they're completely harmless and don't do anything at all
          And you still are.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        ENTER!

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Is the range still 6km?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Soviet union produces absurd amounts of prototype shit on top of its serial production
          >Russian federation loses the capability to produce meaningful amounts of armor or aircraft
          >keeps the absurd amounts prototype shit

          It fucks me up how this was enough to convince half the world that they're still a global military power.
          Then again, some people still think that six months into their blyatzkrieg into a neighboring country with the GDP of fucking Kuwait.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >keeps the absurd amounts prototype shit
            Unlike USA, they usualy finish their prototypes sooner or later like this one
            https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/russia-is-working-on-a-new-anti-ship-ballistic-missile-report

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Unlike the USA
              Anon stop making me laugh
              Pic unrelated

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                USA cancels majority of its research programs. Russians eventually finish their shit even if sometimes they have to suspend programs due to lack of money.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                lol holy shit you fuckers are beyond saving, i feel sorry for your parents if you're an actual westerner

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Su-57
                >introduced 2020
                >16 built (10 prototypes, 6 serial, of which one ate shit)
                >F-35
                >introduced 2015
                >825+ built

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHA

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              When are they finishing this guy? Or is this the end product?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It makes sense when you realize the projects have the primary function of embezzling money.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Speaking of.... Did the TOS-1 prove to be another useless wunderwaffe?
        Maybe you should ask the mounds of burnt okrainian corpses.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >wunderwaffe

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        useful for destroying civilian apartment buildings and shopping centers

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Speaking of.... Did the TOS-1 prove to be another useless wunderwaffe? The only reports I've seen of them being in the war was when they were abandooned during the first few weeks. I suppose it's short range and tank chassis makes it incompatible with Russian "logistics"
        It's wiping cities and soldiers in trenches just fine.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Why don't you go to Ukraine and tell us all what it's like to be on the receiving end of one?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Based. HIMARS have actually proven to be wunderwaffe just like the M777 and shitty US suicide drones. TOS1 are unironically superior in every way.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Neither HIMARS nor TOS are wunderwaffe.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              /k/ope

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          since they are still holding Pisky...it's nothing scary

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          iirc that wasnt a TOS-1, it was a de-mining vehicle being used like a sturmtiger.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It doesn’t not have a turret, so it is not capable of tactical turret ejecting, therefore it’s useless.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I've got it...
    The Piss Key...

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I mean, this is truly ripe for
    >we don't NEED Pisky

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Sometimes you just gotta take a step back and think about how insanely inadequate the forces at play are. Donetsk is the capital of one of the two separatist republics, has been for 8 years, and they have the full backing of the Russian Army. Yet we're half a year into this war and they still haven't taken a village sitting on the plains, less than 10 kms from Donetsk city proper. If the UA political leadership wasn't completely retarded even Lyschansk may still be Ukrainian, amazing.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's 10km to the city centre. But Pisky borders Donetsk, it's right there.
      In 2014 they couldn't take the Donetsk airport for 5 month, and only did it by the way of levelling it to the ground. And back then we didn't even have a real army.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >If the UA political leadership wasn't completely retarded even Lyschansk may still be Ukrainian, amazing
      Ukraine didn't have HIMARS then so Russian artillery worked 60000 shells a day, even if Ukraine didn't hold Severodonetsk(which Russians paid in blood for every inch), they'd have to abandon Lysychansk anyway but with lower Russian losses

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Severo was a mistake and no, the Russian casualties don't make up for it. Any casualties the Russians suffered at Severo they would've suffered the same and more at Lysychansk with Ukraine also holding onto Luhansk longer with the option to withdraw more efficiently when the time inevitably comes.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >would've suffered the same and more at Lysychansk
          there would be no fighting in Lysychansk anyway, if they just took troops in Severodonetsk and send them to Popasna they'd use them to go around Lysychansk, not fighting in Lysychansk

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Pisky is a great citadel from the time of Olga of kiev, if it falls all ukraine will be wide open for steiner's counter attack.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    "Kirov Reporting"

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >piss key

    makes me wonder if there are american towns or cities which sound like stupid vulgar shit in other languages.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There are American towns that sound like stupid vulgar shit in English.
      And some people have lists lists of towns that sound funny in other languages:
      https://matadornetwork.com/read/us-cities-translate-hilariously/
      I assume most of these places are on the same level as Pisky, because Cape Cod (Cape Norwegian Penis) is the only one I've ever heard of.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    does ukraine still pretend they did not lose than place weeks ago and lost like 500 people while at it?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Apparently yes.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Except even Russia keeps saying they're trying to take it despite supposedly taking it weeks ago.

      Are you saying the Russians are now bombing a village they supposedly captured weeks ago and killing their own forces?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Are you saying the Russians are now bombing a village they supposedly captured weeks ago and killing their own forces?
        tbh that sounds like something Russia would do

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        then why does Russia keep saying they're attacking it and making progress and showing videos of them attacking it? See [...]
        Are they just attacking it because they can't attack anything else and need to show they are doing something?

        Where are they saying they're attacking it?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      then why does Russia keep saying they're attacking it and making progress and showing videos of them attacking it? See

      https://i.imgur.com/FfAveqs.jpg

      it's crazy cause vatnik twitter shills how the UA "volksturm" keep getting captured and then they cant take the fucking village that they've erased with TOS and 152 the entire time.

      Are they just attacking it because they can't attack anything else and need to show they are doing something?

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Haven't been following the war for a week or two but didn't they take Pesky in early August?
    Are you maybe confusing it with Avdeevka?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >but didn't they take Pesky in early August?
      >Are you maybe confusing it with Avdeevka?
      they didn't took either

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I didn't say anything about Avdeevka being taken just asking if OP is confusing them since its a heavily fortified place like Peski

        They claimed to take Pisky like two weeks ago and boasted how it was a turning point in the whole Donbass area for some reason. It turns out Ukies are still entrenched in the northen part to this day.
        I would like to also remind everyone that it's a village literally on the suburbs of the Donetsk city just 1 (one) km from away from the infamous Donetsk airport and Donbabweans were unable to take it for 6 (six) months so far.

        No matter how fortified these places are its embarrassing that the Russians still allow Ukrainians to shell innocent civilians in Donetsk from these places.
        Especially because a place like Peski has no civilians anymore and its only military personnel and equipment. What's stopping them from carpet bombing this village besides incompetence?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >What's stopping them from carpet bombing this village
          But they did that some time ago. Still were unable to advance.

          >innocent civilians in Donetsk
          Haha. Good one.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Haha. Good one.
            wtf is wrong with you???

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              What's wrong with me? What do you mean? All targets hit by AFU in the Donetsk were military ones. Same as when Russians bombed those schools, shopping malls, thaters and hospitals. All valid military targets full of soldiers, remeber?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yeah they are bombing military targets by shelling residential buildings and throwing dozens of mines on every street

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Those residental buildings are packed with Russian soldiers. So they are valid targets.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you are mentally ill

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why? You can't prove there weren't Russian soldiers there when those building were hit. And generally Ukraine is conducting methodical and surgical approach in this special military operation so there's no need to worry about civilians.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                see

                you are mentally ill

                also i like how you ignored the mines thing

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                But that would mean Russian military leadership is also mentally ill.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well of course they are mentally ill since they allow civilians in Dotensk to be shelled by the Ukrainians

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, they are mentally ill becasue they deliberately shell Ukrianian civilans and then use bullshit stupid excuses like I did in my previous posts.
                Now fuck off vatnik.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >For 8 years Russia, Luganda, and Dombabwe have claimed that they Ukrainians have been committing atrocities against them
                >For 8 years the UN has offered to send observers to document these atrocites
                >For 8 years Russia, Luganda, and Dombabwe have said no

                Really makes you think.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why are you lying? Foreign observers were allowed and they documented that 15k civilians died as a result of Ukrainian aggression in Donbass over the years.
                Also lets not forget that they literally burned people alive in a building in Odessa

                No, they are mentally ill becasue they deliberately shell Ukrianian civilans and then use bullshit stupid excuses like I did in my previous posts.
                Now fuck off vatnik.

                you are a piece of work aren't you lol

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >muh genocide in the Donbass!
                Press ganging every male above 16 in a region isn't a genocide?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                who said anything about genocide?

                >Foreign observers were allowed and they documented that 15k civilians died as a result of Ukrainian aggression in Donbass over the years.

                >During the entire conflict period, from 14 April 2014 to 31 December 2021, OHCHR (UN) recorded a total of 3,106 conflict-related civilian deaths (not including MH17, 298)
                Vatniks lie through their fucking teeth

                >mining areas occupied by enemy military forces is Le Bad

                Vatnik whining truly knows no bounds.

                Why are you lying, vatmoron? UN observers were denied at every turn. Not a single independent and objective observer documented any of your mythical 15k civilian deaths.

                Literally have a nice day, vatmoron.

                Lies, lies, lies and even more lies on top of other lies. I see you are learning from Big Monke.

                damn you people are insane

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >lie
                >get called on
                >huh, you are all insane
                Just fuck off already.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >muh Russian systematic ordered rape
                Ukraine fired their human rights chief for spreading that and other bullshit back at the start of June you absolute chump.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Foreign observers were allowed and they documented that 15k civilians died as a result of Ukrainian aggression in Donbass over the years.

                >During the entire conflict period, from 14 April 2014 to 31 December 2021, OHCHR (UN) recorded a total of 3,106 conflict-related civilian deaths (not including MH17, 298)
                Vatniks lie through their fucking teeth

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why are you lying, vatmoron? UN observers were denied at every turn. Not a single independent and objective observer documented any of your mythical 15k civilian deaths.

                Literally have a nice day, vatmoron.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Lies, lies, lies and even more lies on top of other lies. I see you are learning from Big Monke.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >15k civilians died as a result of Ukrainian aggression in Donbass over the years
                Where did you get such numbers could I get a source?
                Here is mine https://www.statista.com/statistics/1293409/civilian-deaths-related-to-russia-ukraine-conflict/

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >statista
                also
                >source?!!?
                said like a true you know what

                >lie
                >get called on
                >huh, you are all insane
                Just fuck off already.

                calm down

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So source is: believe me bro
                Much obliged

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If the most American organization (the UN) admits that 5k civilians were killed by Ukrainian shelling before 2022, you automatically know that those numbers are at least 3 times higher.

                Btw answer me this with yes or no
                >Did the nazis in Odessa burn a dozen people alive in 2014?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >American organization (the UN)
                LMAO

                >Did the nazis in Odessa burn a dozen people alive in 2014?
                Yes
                But didn't those people startet throwing molotovs at said "nazis" first? And then baricaded themself inside said building?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >But didn't those people startet throwing molotovs at said "nazis" first?
                No.
                They were trying to save their lives from the nazi mob that rules with Ukraine

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Russia did nothing wrong
                https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-27275383

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you are not even trying at this point lmao
                cmon you can do better i believe in you

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >initiate violence by shooting guns at peaceful demonstrations
                >declare yourself a victim trying to save yourself after you barricade yourself in building and accidentally set it on fire because you're retard who can't handle molotov

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                See, that's why people despise you. Even in such an easy task as having just a normal discussion about things you brought up, you start in this same moment act like a literal degenerate. But I guess that's what you get when you are indoctrinated for a hundred years .

                its literally an article from the BBC why the fuck would you post that shit and act as if its relevant
                i guess an article from whatever the most popular russian media outlet is where it says that the US funded biolabs with corona and monkeypox in Ukraine should be taken as an undeniable fact because well there's an article about it

                https://i.imgur.com/Un2ZbJK.jpg

                Mercenary subhumans? Come on. You should not talk like that about close friends of Big Monke.

                when i was posting monke images on /int/ you didn't even know that there was a conflict in Donbass

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so to you BBC is as reliable as Russia Today?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                as reliable as in don't trust either
                why is this surprising to you?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                then who do we trust? what your dreams said? what your feelings feel?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >what your feelings feel?
                why wouldn't you trust this

                btw you and

                BBC was one of the only western media outlets to post Ukrainian war crime articles, so yes? I trust them more than I trust RT lol.

                cant be serious with this BBC thing lol

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Answer the question, who do we trust. Or listen to. As the other guy said, the BBC did articles on Ukrainian war crimes, meaning they weren't being biased. That is infinitely more trustworthy than RT or whatever.

                If your answer is
                >TRUST NOBODY!
                Then why do I trust you to tell me what I should trust? You've not given me any 'legit' sources which totally don't hide the truth.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it doesn't matter what i say because you have already made up your mind and won't accept anything i say

                the fact that you even tried to defend the BBC says enough about your mental capacity

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I am very demoralized now bros... this very smart and informed anon has given up on us...

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                how did you even come to this conclusion after reading the post? just how dumb are you lmao

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                k archive Donbas until 1.1.2022 results 415
                k archive Ukraine until 1.1.2022 results 42867
                Really unknown subject on k

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                exactly
                no wonder there are newfags here who unironically post BBC articles lmao

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://desuarchive.org/k/search/text/ukraine/end/2022-1-1/page/15/
                Maybey I didn't express myself correctly it's before 1.1.2022

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I did say Donbass specifically, 415 mentions is nothing.
                Ukraine is a broader subject. You have Crimea, Maidan, discussion about their army and equipment power level, overall politics and shit like that on top of the war in Donbass

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So is 3800 mentions since 1.1 compared to 119249

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                BBC was one of the only western media outlets to post Ukrainian war crime articles, so yes? I trust them more than I trust RT lol.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Maybe because everyone called it the Clankening (and other variations) you utter newfag

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >just name every single variation you know about dondbabwe
                Utterly retarded

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You have there literally videos from that day. Retard.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                See, that's why people despise you. Even in such an easy task as having just a normal discussion about things you brought up, you start in this same moment act like a literal degenerate. But I guess that's what you get when you are indoctrinated for a hundred years .

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Imagine crying about nazis on PrepHole
                You are in the wrong place, and i recommend that you leave.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                clicked on the thread because it was on the frontpage, idk what kind of place its since i don't browse it, weapons and wars are for retards

                but i was under the impression that this is a board for trannies that love guns, didn't know you were nazi lovers as well kek

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Hating Russia doesn't make one a nazi.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                but having nazi tattoos, forming paramilitary groups with nazi slogans and emblems, burning innocent people alive, etc, does make you a nazi

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So DNR army are nazis? Wagner group are nazis? Good to know.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >DNR army are nazis?
                wtf are you talking about? seriously get help
                >Wagner group are nazis?
                mercenary subhumans

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Mercenary subhumans? Come on. You should not talk like that about close friends of Big Monke.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                DNR has a lot of neo nazi groups, which made the fight over mariupol so fucking hilarious.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                russia has far more nazi like characteristics than ukeaine. it's like ukraine put 1 skill point in nazism and russia put 15 skill points in nazism.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >bydlo
                >innocent
                Good joke.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Clearly the DPR is in on the conspiracy to cover up the 20,000 deaths in the Donbas region, because their own reports show only a handful of deaths per year. The efforts by the State Department to cover up the 30,000 ethnic Russian children killed goes deep indeed!
                https://ombudsman-dnr.ru/doklad-upolnomochennogo-po-pravam-cheloveka-v-donetskoy-narodnoy-respublike/

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Did the nazis in Odessa burn a dozen people alive in 2014?

                And again, that's truly awful, but those are rookie numbers m8 - bucha is up around 500 civillians killed by Russians, many tortured prior to being shot.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >people
                vatmorons

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Come back when your handlers teach you some better tricks.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/mhGcalE.png

                Clearly the DPR is in on the conspiracy to cover up the 20,000 deaths in the Donbas region, because their own reports show only a handful of deaths per year. The efforts by the State Department to cover up the 30,000 ethnic Russian children killed goes deep indeed!
                https://ombudsman-dnr.ru/doklad-upolnomochennogo-po-pravam-cheloveka-v-donetskoy-narodnoy-respublike/

                Even the separatists think vatniks are full of shit.
                tl;dr for those who can't read Russian and are too lazy to machine translate"
                >guy is unhappy with Russian support since 2014
                >feels betrayed by Minsk agreement being "imposed" on them
                >says he's going to gather the boys and storm Kremlin if there is another truce
                >says "intensified shelling" of Donbass is a lie, it didn't happen neither in February, nor for the first two months of the war due to hohols "lacking strength"
                No wonder so many separatist military leaders fall victim to "friendly fire" or "hohol terror acts".

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Separatists are fucking retarded holy shit, Monke send them lifeline by Minsk agreement and Russian real army but this moron pretends separatists were HELD BACK?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >15k civillians
                Over how many years was that, 7 ? Russia killed way over 10 000 in Mariupol alone in a couple of months.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Russia killed way over 10 000 in Mariupol alone in a couple of months.
                In a state of war and full on invasion.
                Also I'm not sure the people from Mariupol would agree with you that it was Russia that killed their relatives and neighbors when 95% of them voted to join Donbass back in 2014.
                And every interview you see with a citizen from Mariupol they shit on the ukrainians for using them as a human shield

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Does anyone have the original source for this?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                In upper left corner is logo of radio free europe so I guess it's them

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >And every interview you see with a citizen from Mariupol
                is there any telegram channel for good stuff western media tries to bury?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i don't use telegram idk just youtube

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >youtube
                lmao, youtube has guys saying this war is all going to plan for Russia and has hundreds of comments from people agreeing with it.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yeah and it also has videos of apparent 2k russian tanks destroyed and that ukraine is doing a counter offense on Kherson...
                there are also flat earthers and vaccine supporters, you can find any kind of freaks

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Some more recent numbers point towards 68 000 people dead. Based on the amount of burial requests.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >mining areas occupied by enemy military forces is Le Bad

                Vatnik whining truly knows no bounds.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They claimed to take Pisky like two weeks ago and boasted how it was a turning point in the whole Donbass area for some reason. It turns out Ukies are still entrenched in the northen part to this day.
      I would like to also remind everyone that it's a village literally on the suburbs of the Donetsk city just 1 (one) km from away from the infamous Donetsk airport and Donbabweans were unable to take it for 6 (six) months so far.

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >/Ukraine General/

    [...]

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >>[...]

      [...]

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >>

    [...]

    [...]

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They’re going to do EXACTLY what they’re been doing for the last 4 months: arty the shit out of it until the defenders can’t take it any more and leave. They’ll take the village and move on to the next while you trash cope with memes and the echo chamber as usual. Aren’t you tired of it?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Have you noticed that the settlements Russia "arty the shit out of" have been getting progressively smaller? Every one else has. It's almost as if their capacity for sustained indiscriminate bombardments is getting rather thin. I wonder why that could be?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Russia has virtually endless artillery and shells. They can do it for decades to come and produce more.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, but after watching the hohol idiots get slaughtered, the US made them break up. They can't be massacred en masse now, but the glorious Kherson offensive will have to wait, 'til 2045 or so.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Russia is so strong it will hold a small Ukrainian city for perhaps even 20 years!
            These new expectations the Russians have adapted to are great. Six months and they already agree they're about even with or maybe slightly weaker than the poorest country in Europe. Putin's new world order is going great.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >last four months
      Pisky is in visual range of Donetsk Airport. They've been fighting over it for eight years.

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So how's the glorious Kherson offensive coming, bros?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Being prepared it looks like.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What kind of military genius ordered them to form this kind of column and stand still in the open field? They really want to get rektd by HIMARS or some other long range weapon it seems.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Maybe the okrainian capacity to strike is overestimated. Shilling here would give you that impression.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            not that anon, but my impression about russia's military changed a lot since this war. I was actually a fan of their stuff, and thought they were better than the west stuff. I was so fucking wrong and I felt bad about being aretard for years

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Well, nobody's fault but your own if you fall for shilling.

              Overestimated? Not long ago they erased your airbase in the fucking Crimmea. 150 km from the front.

              I have an airbase in Crimea? Cool!

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Overestimated? Not long ago they erased your airbase in the fucking Crimmea. 150 km from the front.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They are probably very far away from actual frontline. Preparing for another URAAAAAAAAA charge into minefields and losing 90% of tanks and crews like their attacks in Donbass

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i really hope we eventually get to see some of the fortifications that were built there. considering how much the russians have thrown at that place for so little gain it must look like the fucking Maginot.
    unless of course all this talk of pisky being some kind of superfortress is bullshit, in which case that would mean the russians are just retarded, but theres no way thats possible right?

    right?

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Rest assured, Bidwell, in 20 years or so, the ravages of old age will deal with the bear far more cruelly than we ever could have.

Your email address will not be published.