>so weeding?
Not weeds, rodents will come and eat it, and burrow in the fields. If left the waste will also molder which makes it so you can't use the field for a long time.
so after harvest it gets burnt.
I'm pretty sure we aren't even the only place that does this.
I saw this happening when traveling through Denmark, my local friend told me its totally illegal but the farmers do it all on the same day so there isn't enough police to charge them.
>Presumably something to do with softening tar
Pretty much yeah, also some road crews use them when doing asphalt work like small patches or band aid fixes for cracks.
>Presumably something to do with softening tar
Pretty much yeah, also some road crews use them when doing asphalt work like small patches or band aid fixes for cracks.
Pretty sure one was done a few decades ago in Europe.
Commercial flamethrowers are usually weak but homemade ones can be equal to Vietnam warcrime era ones.
>Holding the doctors responsible for the death of his wife he wrote a 120-page letter titled "Muttermord — Einzelschicksal und Analyse eines Systems" (Matricide - Individual fate and analysis of a system) >120 pages
jesus
>Holding the doctors responsible for the death of his wife he wrote a 120-page letter titled "Muttermord — Einzelschicksal und Analyse eines Systems" (Matricide - Individual fate and analysis of a system) >120 pages
jesus
the definition is legally meaningless because it comes from a hamfisted attempt to violate the second amendment of the US constitution by redefining what a "weapon" is
the people who wrote it barely understand what a firearm is, but they need their occupying force (police) to have as close to constant overmatch as possible (because otherwise police are too moronic to function; they also frighten easily)
Simple, because not everyone can afford AP ammo but most can afford flammable liquids. Plus I have yet to see body armor that stops flames and prevents asphyxiation
Why the hell am I not allowed to own one?
We use them to clear agricultural waste
>We use them to clear agricultural waste
so weeding?
seems a bit extreme to me and sounds expensive
>seems a bit extreme to me and sounds expensive
Sounds like you are a moron.
>so weeding?
Not weeds, rodents will come and eat it, and burrow in the fields. If left the waste will also molder which makes it so you can't use the field for a long time.
so after harvest it gets burnt.
I'm pretty sure we aren't even the only place that does this.
Indians burn their fields after harvest. Partly why smog in big cities is so bad
I saw this happening when traveling through Denmark, my local friend told me its totally illegal but the farmers do it all on the same day so there isn't enough police to charge them.
Yep, and everywhere in the US but Maryland and California, permits required, everywhere else allows them fully as agricultural tools.
There's also a legitimate use in some roofing jobs, although I don't actually know what for. Presumably something to do with softening tar.
>Presumably something to do with softening tar
Pretty much yeah, also some road crews use them when doing asphalt work like small patches or band aid fixes for cracks.
I've used a propane torch (not a flamethrower) to heat metal for metalworking
it shrinks and stuff when cooled, not to make it soft
Propane torches are not flamethrowers.
OK
> posts something affirming anon's statement
Go back to your ukraine threads, yuropoor.
Frick off back to vkontakte, kacap. I'm going to use your mom's skull as an onahole.
Free italians don't ask for parmesan
Is this an attempt at viral marketing? Seen this thing posted a dozen times in the last two days.
yeah seen it aswell prob a shill thread
Fun Fact: Flamethrowers don't count as firearms in a lot of Euro countries either
As far as I can tell they're completely unregulated here in Sweden.
What part of the land of the free, did you not understand?
You have a better way to de-ice your driveway while letting your Black neighbors know to keep the music down?
>How the hell are Americans allowed to own flamethrowers?
Frick you that's how.
When will we see a school massacre with one of these?
Pretty sure one was done a few decades ago in Europe.
Commercial flamethrowers are usually weak but homemade ones can be equal to Vietnam warcrime era ones.
>Cologne school massacre
Holy shit
>mfw
>Holding the doctors responsible for the death of his wife he wrote a 120-page letter titled "Muttermord — Einzelschicksal und Analyse eines Systems" (Matricide - Individual fate and analysis of a system)
>120 pages
jesus
German autism at work.
My heater core went bad so I use mine to defrost my windows
Frick ya mudda
What's wrong with owning a flammenwerfer? They seem pretty based to me.
It's a gas rated super soaker, how the frick do you ban them?
Well it's not a gun so who cares
>So after you mag dump you can incinerate what's left?
yes
If I use a lighter and a can of hairspray
Because they are just oversized blowtorches/weed burners
Honest question, how are these not considered destructive devices?
the definition is legally meaningless because it comes from a hamfisted attempt to violate the second amendment of the US constitution by redefining what a "weapon" is
the people who wrote it barely understand what a firearm is, but they need their occupying force (police) to have as close to constant overmatch as possible (because otherwise police are too moronic to function; they also frighten easily)
Simple, because not everyone can afford AP ammo but most can afford flammable liquids. Plus I have yet to see body armor that stops flames and prevents asphyxiation