How powerful were nuclear artillery shells? Were they as powerful as a GBU-43 MOAB per shell?

How powerful were nuclear artillery shells? Were they as powerful as a GBU-43 MOAB per shell?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    just doesn't seem like a good idea way too close to the blast

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Were they as powerful as a GBU-43 MOAB per shell?
    journalist question

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Hiroshima 15 tons TNT equivalent
      >not kilotons
      lmao

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      God just imagine the Soi'd up no-guns journalist that made this image

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Hiroshima 15 tons TNT equivalent
      >not kilotons
      lmao

      God just imagine the Soi'd up no-guns journalist that made this image

      original said 15 kt
      you are noresearch homosexuals who fall for memes
      ever considered a career in the military?
      https://www.pressreader.com/usa/chicago-sun-times/20170414/281487866217583

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >posts the corrected version
        embarrassing

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >posts a slide thread
          how nothing
          you're nothing
          nobody
          null
          void
          dust

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            exactly what threads do you think are being slid, schizo?

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You can just go check on Wikipedia you know. You know, show some agency?

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they will never forget

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's this? I see it a lot in nook pics and vids

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They launch small rockets seconds before the blast to create smoke trails that they use to analyze the the pressure wave. It's just a way to visually measure the atmospheric effects of the blast.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Smoke trails to observe speed of shockwave.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They launch small rockets seconds before the blast to create smoke trails that they use to analyze the the pressure wave. It's just a way to visually measure the atmospheric effects of the blast.

      Smoke trails to observe speed of shockwave.

      They also help with estimating size in photos.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Since russia broke Budapest memo Ukies should make tactical nukes and use their withing their own territories sparingly.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    https://letmegooglethat.com/

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I actually tried to calculate the Beirut explosion a few years ago, to get some reference, and it turned out to be around the same yield as a 155mm nuclear artillery shell, wich checks out with what the germans concluded.
    So look at those vids and you shouldnt be far off.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I think the smallest might be an 8 inch projectile, but I might be be a gay on that.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        c**t dodger

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          72 tonnes of TNT, so 7 MOABS.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Is this shell that can be turned into a Enhanced Radiation Munition?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That was the W70 for the lance tactical ballistic missile, although the whole 'neutron bomb' effect is somewhat exaggerated, it's just that the lethal zone of the direct radiation is larger than the overpressure blast.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Neutron Bombs confuse me, I understand how they work and what they do but I don’t quite grasp what makes them more useful than a conventional air burst nuclear munition.
              On a unrelated anecdote I have a friend who even though he is a very smart bloke swears up and down that the US used a Neutron Bomb on a occupied airport during the 2003 Iraq war, I’ve tried telling him he’s being moronic and that if a Neutron Bomb was used the airport would of been flattened but he refuses to believe me.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Neutron Bombs confuse me, I understand how they work and what they do but I don’t quite grasp what makes them more useful than a conventional air burst nuclear munition.
                The idea was that they would cause less destruction to the land/cities while still killing the enemy, since it was assumed that war with the USSR would be fought in friendly territory in Germany, they were looking for a way to use nuclear weapons which they considered necessary to defeat the overwhelming conventional Soviet forces without turning Germany into a bombed out hellscape, or less of one anyway.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Enhanced radiation bomb were partly meant as anti-armor weapons. Tanks of the era were actually quite resistant to the blast effects of nuclear weapons, but not nearly as so when it came to radiation.

                ?si=DN1BiBSRN8jJCQkC&t=997

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And since you apparently are a moron, yes, that is significantly more then a MOAB, magnitudes more to be specific.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They were pretty powerful I guess.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *